counting crime

30
Counting Crime Methods for Counting Crime? Current Crime Numbers/Trends Explaining the Crime Drop 1

Upload: tyme

Post on 24-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Counting Crime. Methods for Counting Crime? Current Crime Numbers/Trends Explaining the Crime Drop . Uniform Crime Reports. Self- Report Surveys. Victim Surveys. Methods of Measuring Crime. Based on Crimes Reported to the Police. Based on a population unit of 100,000 people. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Counting Crime

Counting CrimeMethods for Counting Crime?

Current Crime Numbers/TrendsExplaining the Crime Drop

1

Page 2: Counting Crime

Methods of Measuring Crime

2

Uniform Crime Reports

Self- Report Surveys

Victim Surveys

Page 3: Counting Crime

Uniform Crime Reports

3

Based on Crimes Reported to the Police

Based on a population unit of 100,000 people

Divided into two representativecategories: Indexed and non-Indexed

Reported for U.S., Cities, and SMSA’s

Crimes known / Arrest = Clearance Rate

Page 4: Counting Crime

Uniform Crime Reports

Part I “Index” Crimes◦ Criminal Homicide◦ Forcible Rape◦ Robbery◦ Aggravated assault◦ Burglary◦ Larceny/theft◦ Motor vehicle theft◦ Arson

Part II Crimes◦ All others except traffic

4

Violent Crime

Non-violentCrime

Page 5: Counting Crime

Criticisms and Limitations of the UCR

5

Cannot capture the “dark figure” of crime

Methodological Hiccups

• Counting Rule• Reporting Practices• Attempted vs. Completed

Crimes

Page 6: Counting Crime

The Future of the Uniform Crime Reports

National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)

Maintained by the F.B.I.Twenty-two crime categoriesMore information on each crime in each

categoryData compiled based on incidents, not

arrests.

6

Page 7: Counting Crime

Participants (usually juveniles) reveal information about their violations of the law

Advantages◦Get at “Dark Figure of Crime”◦“Victimless Crimes”◦Compare to “official data”◦Measure theoretical concepts and connect with criminal behavior

7

Self-Report Surveys

Page 8: Counting Crime

Percent Reporting Nonmedical Drug Use, by Type of Drug, Past 12 Months (UMD Survey, 2012)

Prescription sleeping med.

Prescription sedative

Other illicit drug (besides pot)

Prescription pain med.

Prescription stimulant

Any prescription drug

Marijuana

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

5.9%

6.2%

10.4%

16.1%

24.2%

35.1%

49.5%

Page 9: Counting Crime

Self-Reported Academic Dishonesty, Past 12 Months

Lied to an instructor about missing an exam

Received illicit copy of an exam

Looked at another student's exam

Falsified information for a term paper

Plagiarized a term paper

5.9%

2.9%

30.1%

4.4%

3.0%

Page 10: Counting Crime

Self-Report Surveys

Disadvantages◦May underestimate “chronic offenders”

◦People Can Lie◦Survey Methodology ProblemsSeriousness of Offense

◦No “National” survey for trendsException = MTF for drugs/alcohol

10

Page 11: Counting Crime

11

National Crime Victimization

Survey1. Asks victims about their encounters with criminals2. Nationally representative sample3. May also describe people most at risk 4. Limitations:

Little information about offendersCannot assess some crimesLimitations of Survey Research

Page 12: Counting Crime

REVIEW

UCR◦Aggregate Data (see trends), Crimes known to

policeSelf-report

◦Individual level data, links offender characteristics to criminal offending

NCVS◦Aggregate Data (see trends), victimizations

12

Page 13: Counting Crime

Crime Trends and Correlates of Crime

Crime Trends◦Is crime increasing, decreasing or stable?◦Why?

Correlates of Crime◦What factors are related to crime?◦Geographic location, Age, Race, Gender, Social Class?

13

Page 14: Counting Crime

Crime Trends

UCR and NCVS data reveal a steady decrease in violent crime since the mid 1990s◦The decrease is being driven by a sharp decline in violent crime among juveniles.

NCVS indicates a long term trend of decreasing property crime◦Some difference with UCR data

14

Page 15: Counting Crime

15

Page 16: Counting Crime
Page 17: Counting Crime
Page 18: Counting Crime
Page 19: Counting Crime

Duluth Violent Crime 1986-201019

Page 20: Counting Crime

MN vs. National Violent Crime (per 100,000 citizens)

Homicide Robbery Rape0

20406080

100120140

MNU.S.

20

Page 21: Counting Crime

Explaining Crime Trends

◦The usual suspectsAge Composition The EconomySocial malaiseGuns—Availability Justice Policy—Police or Prisons

◦Reality? Difficult to predict trends

21

Page 22: Counting Crime

The Crime Drop (1990s-present)Drop driven by young males in inner city

areas◦Decline of the “Crack Cocaine” wars◦The “blunt” era

Change in inner city culture ◦Mass incarceration

Fringe Explanations Freakonomics: Was it Abortion? Was it a drop in lead exposure?

22

Page 23: Counting Crime

Correlates of Crime

Demographics◦Age◦Sex◦Race

23

Page 24: Counting Crime

GENDER AND CRIME

UCR, NCVS, and SR data all indicate that males are more likely than females to commit criminal acts◦ Socialization?◦ Biological differences?◦ Feminist explanations

24

Page 25: Counting Crime

RACE AND CRIME

SR weak if any relationshipOfficial data strong relationshipIs relationship due to bias?

How police patrol and interact with minorities Disparity in how CJS processes minorities?

NCVS data confirms some “true” race-crime relationship. Why does race predict crime?

Relationship to class, neighborhood, culture

25

Page 26: Counting Crime

26

The Age-Crime Curve

Page 27: Counting Crime

Age and Crime

Crime is “young” persons gameHOWEVER

◦There is a group of “chronic” offenders that persist in crime after adulthood

◦The “Chronic” 6%

27

Page 28: Counting Crime

Continuity of Crime

28

Cohort studies clearly show that most chronic juvenile offenders continue their law-violating careers as adults.

Then and ………….. NOW

Page 29: Counting Crime

Crime Victimization

Criminals and victims tend to look the same demographically ◦Most crime is intra-racial ◦Victimization for most crimes most likely

among Young Male Urban

29

Page 30: Counting Crime

What is counted, “counts”

We have no “UCR” mechanism to gauge white collar crime◦How to assess insider trading, environmental

crimes, corporate crime? Most large corporate crime prosecutions in in a

settlement

30