course evaluation report for teaching staff · mag. dr. dieter fuchs, approaching literatures in...

Universität WienQualitätssicherungUniversitätsstraße 5/3A-1010 Wien

Dear Mr. Mag. Dr. Dieter Fuchs (as private and confidential)

Course Evaluation Report for Teaching Staff

Dear Mr. Mag. Dr. Fuchs,

Please find attached the results of the automated course evaluation analysis for the courseApproaching Literatures in English

conducted with the questionnaire type 012-1-V4:

The first section provides a detailed analysis of the students’ response behaviour.The second section of the analysis report lists the individual mean values for all questions.The third part contains answers to open questions.

You may also access the results at http://evasys.euc.univie.ac.at/evasys/. The user name andpassword for the system have been submitted in a separate email.

Comparative figures for the winter semester and the summer semester will be published on thehomepage of the Special Department for Quality Assurance http://www.qs.univie.ac.at/ in April andSeptember, respectively.

We hope the results provide a helpful and constructive feedback for the continuous development ofyour courses.

For any further enquiries, please contact the Special Department for Quality Assurance(Tel.: 4277-18001 email: [email protected]).

Sincerely,

Lukas Mitterauer

Mag. Dr. Dieter Fuchs, Approaching Literatures in English

29.07.2014 EvaSys evaluation Page 1

Mag. Dr. Dieter Fuchs

Approaching Literatures in English (14S-12-120013-01)No. of responses = 79

Survey ResultsSurvey Results

LegendQuestion text Right poleLeft pole n=No. of responses

av.=Meandev.=Std. Dev.ab.=Abstention

25%

1

0%

2

50%

3

0%

4

25%

5

Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev. Mean

Scale Histogram

1. University wide section1. University wide section

Gender:1.1)

n=76Female 80.3%

Male 19.7%

The contents of the course were very interesting.1.2)I strongly disagreeI strongly agree n=75

av.=1,9dev.=0,8

34,7%

1

45,3%

2

17,3%

3

2,7%

4

0%

5

This particular course was very important in itscontribution towards reaching the goals of theacademic program.

1.3)I strongly disagreeI strongly agree n=77

av.=2,2dev.=1

28,6%

1

40,3%

2

20,8%

3

7,8%

4

2,6%

5

The lecturer was motivating.1.4)I strongly disagreeI strongly agree n=76

av.=1,6dev.=0,9

59,2%

1

23,7%

2

13,2%

3

3,9%

4

0%

5

Overall, I would rate the course as1.5)very badvery good n=73

av.=1,8dev.=0,7

35,6%

1

49,3%

2

15,1%

3

0%

4

0%

5

2. Questions from the director of studies2. Questions from the director of studies

I am studying2.1)

n=75BA 96%

MA Ling 0%

MA Lit&Cult 0%

Lehramt 1.3%

Diplom 2.7%

PhD 0%

Compared to other courses my workload for thiscourse was

2.2)much lowermuch higher n=72

av.=3,1dev.=0,7

2,8%

1

9,7%

2

69,4%

3

15,3%

4

2,8%

5



In order to complete this course successfully I needed the following number of hours of work (including attendance).2.3)

n=5525 hours 20%

50 hours 34.5%

75 hours 14.5%

100 hours 9.1%

125 hours 9.1%

150 hours 3.6%

175 hours 1.8%

200 hours 3.6%

225 hours 3.6%

I was able to follow the lessons without anyproblems.


av.=1,7dev.=0,8

50,7%

1

37,3%

2

8%

3

4%

4

0%

5

The lecturer encouraged questions and activeparticipation.


av.=1,9dev.=1

43,4%

1

32,9%

2

15,8%

3

6,6%

4

1,3%

5

The course content was covered to an adequateextent and in sufficient detail.


av.=1,7dev.=0,7

42,7%

1

42,7%

2

13,3%

3

1,3%

4

0%

5

The course was structured in a clear andunderstandable manner.


av.=1,5dev.=0,7

56%

1

36%

2

6,7%

3

1,3%

4

0%

5

The assessment criteria for this course are clear tome.


av.=1,6dev.=0,8

57,9%

1

30,3%

2

9,2%

3

1,3%

4

1,3%

5

The study materials used for this course were useful.2.10)I strongly disagreeI strongly agree n=74

av.=1,6dev.=0,8

56,8%

1

29,7%

2

10,8%

3

1,4%

4

1,4%

5

Students taking part in this course received sufficientfeedback in response to their input (contributions,assignments, presentations).


av.=2,2dev.=1

31,8%

1

30,3%

2

30,3%

3

6,1%

4

1,5%

5

The lecturer was able to motivate me for this courseand to stimulate my general interest in my studies.


av.=1,9dev.=0,9

41,3%

1

34,7%

2

16%

3

8%

4

0%

5

It is clear to me why this course is important as apart of my study programme.


av.=1,8dev.=1

52,1%

1

21,9%

2

19,2%

3

5,5%

4

1,4%

5



ProfileSubunit: SPL012 - AnglistikName of the instructor: Mag. Dr. Dieter FuchsName of the course:(Name of the survey)

Approaching Literatures in English

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. University wide section1. University wide section

1.2) The contents of the course were veryinteresting.

I strongly agree I stronglydisagree n=75 av.=1,9 md=2,0 dev.=0,8

1.3) This particular course was very important in itscontribution towards reaching the goals of theacademic program.


1.4) The lecturer was motivating. I strongly agree I stronglydisagree n=76 av.=1,6 md=1,0 dev.=0,9

1.5) Overall, I would rate the course as very good very badn=73 av.=1,8 md=2,0 dev.=0,7


2.2) Compared to other courses my workload forthis course was

much higher much lowern=72 av.=3,1 md=3,0 dev.=0,7

2.4) I was able to follow the lessons without anyproblems.


2.5) The lecturer encouraged questions and activeparticipation.


2.6) The course content was covered to anadequate extent and in sufficient detail.


2.8) The course was structured in a clear andunderstandable manner.


2.9) The assessment criteria for this course areclear to me.


2.10) The study materials used for this course wereuseful.


2.11) Students taking part in this course receivedsufficient feedback in response to their input(contributions, assignments, presentations).


2.12) The lecturer was able to motivate me for thiscourse and to stimulate my general interest inmy studies.


2.13) It is clear to me why this course is important asa part of my study programme.




Comments ReportComments Report


Which aspects of the course content should have been covered in more detail?2.7)



What did you particularly like about this course?2.14)



What do you think could be improved about this course?2.15)

course evaluation report for teaching staff · mag. dr. dieter fuchs, approaching literatures in...

Documents