courtland partners, ltd....2011/06/08 · source: ing reim research as of august 2010 total gross...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright Courtland Partners, Ltd. 2011
Courtland Partners, Ltd.Presentation to:
June 8, 2011
COURTLAND PARTNERS, LTD.
200 Public Square, Suite 2530 10866 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 830 Cleveland, OH 44114 Los Angeles, CA 90024
216.522.0330 310.474.3040
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Employees’ Retirement Plan
Overview
1
OpportunisticValueCore
• Ground-up development
• International/Emerging Markets
• Significant releasing/ redevelopment risk
• Non-traditional property types/ operating companies
• Distressed investments
• Up to 75% Leverage
• Some releasing/ redevelopment risk
• Domestic and Western Europe
• Traditional property types/mezz investments
• Up to 65% Leverage
• Stabilized Properties
• 5-10% vacancy
• Domestic markets
• Traditional Property types (excluding Hotel)
• Up to 40% Leverage
Risk/Reward: Low (core) to High (opportunistic)
Real Estate Asset Class – Risk/Return
2
3
Commodities
Public REITs
Timber
AgricultureCore Real Estate
Value-added Real Estate
Opportunistic Real Estate
Infrastructure
Stocks
Bonds
Cash
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Ret
urn
Risk
Asset Class Risk-Return Spectrum
Note: Core, value, opportunistic, and infrastructure based on Courtland’s forward-looking projections. All other asset classes based on historical date 1Q78 through 4Q2010.
WPERP Real Estate Allocation
4
Investment and Portfolio Risk/Return Ranges1
(for period ended December 31, 2010)
Risk/Return Nominal Net Return
As of12-31-2010
TargetAllocation
PolicyRange
Core 6.0%-8.0% 66.1% 70% 60%-100%
Value 11.0%-13.0% 33.9% 20% 0%-25%
Opportunistic 14.0%-16.0% 0% 10% 0%-15%
Portfolio Mix Targets
Core Core Plus Value Opportunistic
Strategy% of
Portfolio Strategy% of
Portfolio Strategy% of
Portfolio Strategy% of
Portfolio
Core 90% Core 70% Core 50% Core 30%
Value 10% Value 20% Value 20% Value 35%
Oppotun. 0% Opportun. 10% Opportun. 30% Opportun. 35%
Expected Return: 7.5% Expected Return: 8.8% Expected Return: 10.4% Expected Return: 11.6%
Unlevered Return Forecasts
5Source: ING REIM Research as of August 2010
Total Gross Unlevered Return Forecasts 2011-2014 (Per Annum)Average Annual 4-Year Core Unleveraged
Total Return Forecasts 2011-14 %pa
Region Date of Forecast Retail Industrial Office Residential
Asia (ex: Japan) Q2 2010 10.3% 10.9% 6.2% 6.7%
Japan Q2 2010 9.6% 8.9% 10.9% 9.2%
Australia Q2 2010 10.4% 11.5% 12.4% N/A
Continental Europe Q2 2010 9.9% 9.6% 10.1% 7.7%
United Kingdom Q2 2010 8.0% 7.2% 8.4% 5.7%
Canada Q2 2010 10.3% 10.0% 8.3% 8.3%
United States Q2 2010 10.8% 13.7% 15.2% 10.0%
United States 1995-1999 7.9% 13.9% 14.0% 12.4%
WPERP Market Values & Investment Review
6
SUMMARY OF PORTFOLIO RISK/RETURN PROFILEWeighted by
Market Value Market Value plus Unfunded Commitments
Core66.1%
Value33.9%
Core57.7%
Value42.4%
RISK/RETURN REVIEW - MARKET VALUES AND INVESTMENT COMMITMENTS(for period ended December 31, 2010)
Investment Commitments SummaryClient
Market Value % of Port.Original Inv. Remaining Unfund. % of Current and
Investments Incept. Commitment Commitment Unfunded Port.Core $ 77,077,797 66.1% $ 100,000,000 $ - 57.7%JP Morgan SPF 10/07 $ 38,498,277 33.0% $ 50,000,000 $ - 28.8%PRISA 12/06 $ 38,579,519 33.1% $ 50,000,000 $ - 28.9%Value $ 39,568,004 33.9% $ 61,500,000 $ 17,046,304 42.4%CBRE SP V 6/08 $ 16,968,025 14.6% $ 20,000,000 $ 4,086,658 15.8%Mesa West RE Income II 1/10 $ 6,794,783 5.8% $ 20,000,000 $ 12,959,646 14.8%PRISA II 6/07 $ 15,805,197 13.6% $ 21,500,000 $ - 11.8%Total Portfolio $ 116,645,801 100.0% $ 161,500,000 $ 17,046,304 100.0%
Note: $268 million under allocated as of December 31, 2010.
7
Real Estate Asset Class – Property Types
Traditional property types Office Retail Residential (apartments) Industrial Hotel
Non-traditional property types Infrastructure Timber Senior housing Student housing Self-storage Structured finance (mezzanine loans)
WPERP Property Type Diversification
Office43.8%
Industrial9.5%
Retail15.2%
Resid'l23.3%
Hotel5.0%
Land1.1%
Other5.3% 43.8%
9.5%
15.2%
23.3%
5.0%
1.1%
5.3%
34.4%
14.1%
24.4% 24.8%
2.2%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Office Industrial Retail Resid'l Hotel Land Other
LA WPERP NCREIF
(For period ended December 31, 2010)
8
WPERP Geographic Diversification
9
East34.1%
Midwest5.9%
South23.6%
West35.8%
US Not Allocated0.6%
34.1%
5.9%
23.6%
35.8%
0.6%
33.2%
10.5%
22.4%
33.9%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
East Midwest South West US Not Allocated
LA WPERP NCREIF
(For period ended December 31, 2010)
Issues Regarding Leverage
10
Leverage is the process of borrowing capital for (an investment/property), expecting the profits made to be greater than the interest payable. Leverage is a magnifier of returns, both positive and negative returns.
Positives Negatives
Low fixed interest rate High floating interest rate
Low fees High fees
Nonrecourse debt Recourse debt
Covenants (e.g., debt service coverage) No covenants/limited covenants
No prepayment penalty/flexibility Prepayment penalty/inflexibility
Income vs. Treasury Yields
11
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
NPI Income NAREIT Equity Dividend Yield 10-Year Treasury
WPERP Leverage
12
INVESTMENT LEVERAGE REVIEW(for period ended December 31, 2010)
Investment Market Value LeverageMesa West RE Income II Value $6,794,783 56.4%PRISA II Value $15,805,197 49.5%CBRE SP V Value $16,968,025 44.0%JP Morgan SPF Core $38,498,277 29.3%PRISA Core $38,579,519 28.1%
* Core $77,077,797 28.7%* Value $39,568,004 48.3%* Total $116,645,801 35.4%
LEVERAGE GUIDELINE TARGET
RISK/Return Category RANGE
Core Up to 40%
Value Add Up to 65%
Opportunistic Up to 75%
Total Real Estate Portfolio Up to 50%
*Based on Market Values
Liquidity and Control
13
Structure Advantages Concerns
PRIVATE POOLEDFUNDS(TRADITIONAL OPEN-END FUNDS)
Revised structures enable smaller non-institutional investors Existing or specified portfolios Historical return performance Core to Core+ strategy Management organizations and familiarity with
assets Right to redeem
Current value of assets Lack of investor control Potential illiquidity Fee structures Alignment of interests Reasonableness of values (appraisal-based) Manager/ownership changes
PRIVATE POOLEDFUNDS(VALUE ANDOPPORTUNISTICCLOSED-END FUNDS)
Finite life Incentive fees Manager co-investment Preferred returns Total return hurdle
Non-traditional property types Manager conflicts Manager organization Investment allocation issues Style creep
PUBLIC REITS ANDREOCS
Total return Dividend yields Liquidity Alignment of interests Cost of REIT management Growth of larger REITs
Actual liquidity Stock or real estate Manager talent Depth of market in certain property types
PRIVATE SEPARATEACCOUNTS
Control (manager, sell/hold) Incentive fees Exit strategies (portfolio sales, asset/stock
swaps) Valuation control Platform or REOC investing Joint Ventures
Requires large allocation ($100 Mil.+) Manager conflicts (asset allocation) Manager deal flow Property management conflicts Capturing manager value Staffing and oversight
Definitions
14
• NAV, Net Asset Value, current value of equity, net of debt. Based on updated appraisal value.
• Contribution, committed capital called by General Partners
• Distribution, proportion of the called up capital that has been returned back to the Limited Partners
• NCREIF index (Private Equity Real Estate Benchmark), is a quarterly time series composite total return measure of investment performance of a very large pool of individual commercial real estate properties acquired in the private market for investment purposes only.
•Net Operating Income, gross revenue less operating expenses.
•Capitalization rates, provide a tool for real estate investors to use for roughly valuing a property based on its Net Operating Income.
Capitalization Rate = Annual Net Operating Income
Cost (or value)
Portfolio Construction
15
Asset Class Correlations
16
Infla
tion
(CPI
)
Stoc
ks
Bond
s
U.S
. Gov
t. Bo
nds
High
Yie
ld C
orp
Bond
s
TIPS
Com
mod
ities
Publ
ic RE
ITs
NCR
EIF
Tim
ber
Farm
land
Infr
astr
uctu
re
Inflation (CPI) 1.00 0.12 -0.21 -0.33 -0.03 0.48 0.31 0.15 0.41 0.24 0.06 0.71
Stocks 1.00 0.24 0.00 0.66 -0.04 0.18 0.51 0.14 0.08 -0.13 0.89
Bonds 1.00 0.84 0.26 0.61 -0.08 0.13 -0.14 -0.37 -0.38 -0.20
U.S. Govt. Bonds 1.00 -0.15 0.01 -0.17 -0.09 -0.05 -0.18 -0.14 -0.79
High Yield Corp Bonds 1.00 0.32 0.01 0.69 -0.37 -0.14 -0.28 0.72
TIPS 1.00 0.59 0.32 -0.10 -0.38 -0.41 0.55
Commodities 1.00 0.22 0.20 0.27 0.12 0.67
Public REITs 1.00 0.13 -0.09 -0.20 0.85
NCREIF 1.00 0.01 0.11 0.31
Timber 1.00 0.41 -0.07
Farmland 1.00 0.08
Infrastructure 1.00
Note: Table based on return correlations from 1Q78-4Q210, with exception of TIPS (1Q98-4Q2010) and high yield (1Q84-4Q2010).
Inflation Protection – Correlation Analysis
17
Asset Classes: Stocks (S&P 500 Index), Bonds (Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index), Long-Term Government Bonds (Ibbotson Long-Term Govt. Bond Index), Commodities (S&P GSCI Commodity Index), Public Real Estate (NAREIT Equity REIT Index), Private Real Estate (NCREIF All Property Index), Timber (Hancock Timber Resource Group 1978-1986, NCREIF 1987-2010)
Source: Ibbotson, Barclays, NAREIF, NCREIF, Hancock Timber Resources Group
Correlation Asset Total Returns to Inflation (1Q 1978 through 4Q 2010)
*Note: Farmland correlation is for the time period 1970-2010 (Hancock Broad Farmland Index 1970-1990; NCREIF Farmland Index 1991-2010)
0.12
-0.21
-0.33
0.31
0.15
0.41
0.24
0.37
-0.40
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
Stocks Bonds Long-Term Govt Bonds
Commodities Public Real Estate
Private Real Estate
Timber Farmland*
Private Real Estate Returns During Inflationary Periods
18
Inflationary Period Private Real Estate Nominal Returns Consumer Price Index Private Real Estate
Real ReturnsLow Inflation 8.5% 1.4% 7.1%
Moderate Inflation 6.8% 3.1% 3.7%
High Inflation 12.6% 7.1% 5.5%
Real Estate Comparison Period 1978-2010
Inflationary Period TimberNominal Returns Consumer Price Index Timber
Real ReturnsLow Inflation 4.9% 1.3% 3.6%
Moderate Inflation 9.8% 3.2% 6.6%
High Inflation 21.9% 7.4% 14.5%
Inflationary Period Farmland Nominal Returns Consumer Price Index Farmland
Real ReturnsLow Inflation 6.9% 1.6% 5.3%
Moderate Inflation 8.7% 3.1% 5.6%
High Inflation 15.1% 7.5% 7.6%
Timber Comparison Period 1960-2010
Farmland Comparison Period 1970-2010
High Inflation = CPI 4% and aboveModerate Inflation = CPI between 2% and 4%Low Inflation = CPI less than 2%Long-term average inflation rate 4.0% Source: NCREIF, Hancock Timber Resource Group, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Courtland Partners
Investment Pacing – (Bristol SA)Value Fund
19
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
Dec
-93…
Jun-
94…
Dec
-94…
Jun-
95…
Dec
-95…
Jun-
96…
Dec
-96…
Jun-
97…
Dec
-97…
Jun-
98…
Dec
-98…
Jun-
99…
Dec
-99…
Jun-
00…
Dec
-00…
Jun-
01…
Dec
-01…
Jun-
02…
Dec
-02…
Jun-
03…
Dec
-03…
Jun-
04…
Dec
-04…
Jun-
05…
Dec
-05…
Jun-
06…
Dec
-06…
Jun-
07…
Dec
-07…
Jun-
08…
Dec
-08…
Jun-
09…
Dec
-09…
Jun-
10…
Acquisitions Disposition Cap Rate Avg +1 std dev -1 std dev +2 std dev -2 std dev
Acq
uisi
tions
and
Dis
posi
tions
($00
0)
Cap
Rat
e
Investment Pacing – (Lone Star IV) Opportunity Fund
20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
Mar
-00
Jul-0
0N
ov-0
0M
ar-0
1Ju
l-01
Nov
-01
Mar
-02
Jul-0
2N
ov-0
2M
ar-0
3Ju
l-03
Nov
-03
Mar
-04
Jul-0
4N
ov-0
4M
ar-0
5Ju
l-05
Nov
-05
Mar
-06
Jul-0
6N
ov-0
6M
ar-0
7Ju
l-07
Nov
-07
Mar
-08
Jul-0
8N
ov-0
8M
ar-0
9Ju
l-09
Nov
-09
Mar
-10
Jul-1
0N
ov-1
0
Contributions ROC & Dist Cap Rate LT Avg Cap Rate +1 Std Dev -1 Std Dev +2 Std Dev -2 Std Dev
Acq
uisi
tions
and
Dis
posi
tions
($00
0)
Cap
Rat
e
Distributions
Approved 2011 Strategic Plan
21
Note: Estimated plan assets and over/under allocation based on assumed 7.75% total portfolio-level growth rate.
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value
Core: JP Morgan SPF 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278 Invesco Core Real Estate Fund 0 35,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 Prudential PRISA 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,519
Total 77,077,797 112,077,797 112,077,797 112,077,797 112,077,797 66% 66% 61% 64% 72%
Value: Bristol Value Fund II 0 7,500,000 17,500,000 25,000,000 25,000,000 Mesa West RE Income II 6,794,783 10,021,104 10,921,104 8,521,104 2,121,104 Prudential PRISA II 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196 CBRE Strategic Partners Value 5 16,968,000 18,595,000 16,553,000 4,240,000 0
Total 39,567,979 51,921,300 60,779,300 53,566,300 42,926,300 34% 30% 33% 31% 28%
Opportunistic: Lone Star Fund VII 0 3,162,792 5,512,576 4,333,948 22,620Lone Star REF II 0 3,226,188 5,635,666 4,503,371 0
Total - 6,388,980 11,148,242 8,837,319 22,620 0% 4% 6% 5% 0%
Total Real Estate 116,645,776 170,388,077 184,005,339 174,481,416 155,026,717 % of Plan Assets 1.5% 2.1% 2.1% 1.8% 1.5%
Plan Assets (7.75% Growth) 7,690,137,324 8,286,122,967 8,928,297,497 9,620,240,553 10,365,809,195
Over/Under Funded (267,861,090) (243,918,071) (262,409,536) (306,530,612) (363,263,743)
Approved 2011 Strategic Plan
22
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value Mkt. Value
Core: JP Morgan SPF 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278 38,498,278Invesco Core Real Estate Fund 0 35,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000 35,000,000Prudential PRISA 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,519 38,579,5192011 Allocation 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,0002012 Allocation 85,000,000 85,000,000 85,000,0002013 Allocation 60,000,000 60,000,0002014 Allocation 65,000,000
Total 77,077,797 162,077,797 247,077,797 307,077,797 372,077,797 66% 61% 61% 65% 72%
Value: Bristol Value Fund II 0 7,500,000 17,500,000 25,000,000 25,000,000Mesa West RE Income II 6,794,783 10,021,104 10,921,104 8,521,104 2,121,104Prudential PRISA II 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196 15,805,196CBRE Strategic Partners Value 5 16,968,000 18,595,000 16,553,000 4,240,000 02011 Allocation 23,000,000 23,000,000 23,000,000 23,000,0002012 Allocation 22,000,000 22,000,000 22,000,0002013 Allocation 12,000,000 12,000,000
Total 39,567,979 74,921,300 105,779,300 110,566,300 99,926,300 34% 28% 26% 24% 19%
Opportunistic: Lone Star Fund VII 0 3,162,792 5,512,576 4,333,948 22,620Lone Star REF II 0 3,226,188 5,635,666 4,503,371 02011 Allocation 22,000,000 22,000,000 22,000,000 22,000,0002012 Allocation 22,000,000 22,000,000 22,000,000
Total 0 28,388,980 55,148,242 52,837,319 44,022,6200% 11% 14% 11% 9%
Total Real Estate 116,645,776 265,388,077 408,005,339 470,481,416 516,026,717 % of Plan Assets 1.5% 3.2% 4.6% 4.9% 5.0%
Plan Assets (7.75% Growth) 7,690,137,324 8,286,122,967 8,928,297,497 9,620,240,553 10,365,809,195
Over/Under Funded (267,861,090) (148,918,071) (38,409,536) (10,530,612) (2,263,743)
Note: Estimated plan assets and over/under allocation based on assumed 7.75% total portfolio-level growth rate.
Approved 2011 Strategic Plan
23
2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
Funded Committed Funded Committed Funded Committed Funded Committed Funded Committed
Core $50,000,000 $50,000,000 $85,000,000 $85,000,000 $60,000,000 $60,000,000 $65,000,000 $65,000,000 $260,000,000 $260,000,000
Value $23,000,000 $26,450,000 $22,000,000 $25,300,000 $12,000,000 $13,800,000 $0 $0 $57,000,000 $65,550,000
Opportunistic $22,000,000 $27,500,000 $22,000,000 $27,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,000,000 $55,000,000
Total Funded/Committed $95,000,000 $103,950,000 $129,000,000 $137,800,000 $72,000,000 $73,800,000 $65,000,000 $65,000,000 $361,000,000 $380,550,000
Total Real Estate $265,388,077 $408,005,339 $470,481,416 $516,026,717
WPERP Total Portfolio $8,286,122,967 $8,928,297,497 $9,620,240,553 $10,365,809,195
% of WPERP Portfolio 3.2% 4.6% 4.9% 5.0%
To Fund: To Commit:Core $260,000,000 $260,000,000Value $57,000,000 $65,550,000Opportunistic $44,000,000 $55,000,000Total Funded $361,000,000 $380,550,000
Total Allocations to Fund/Commit:
2011 Strategy Implementation/Action Plan
24
Action plan for 2011:
Commit $50 million to core real estate in 2011
Additional allocation beyond Invesco allocation, which will be called in mid 2011
Further commitment to core will need to be monitored closely due to cash flowing into core class;
Commit $20-25 million to value investments;
Commit $20-25 million to opportunistic investment;
Potentially fund dedicated international manager within opportunistic space.
Continue to evaluate distressed debt and equity opportunities.
Real Estate Market Conditions
25
Source: RealtyTrac; March 2011
U.S. Foreclosure Activity – 1Q2011
26
Top 10 Metro Areas with the Highest Foreclosure Rates 1Q2010 vs. 1Q2011
Note: The Foreclosure Heat Map is for the month of February 2011
1Q2010 % HouseholdsMetro Area, State in Foreclosure
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 3.51Modesto, CA 2.93Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 2.82Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 2.81Stockton, CA 2.77Merced, CA 2.76Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 2.63Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 2.41Bakersfield, CA 2.33Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2.30
1Q2011 % HouseholdsMetro Area, State in Foreclosure
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 3.21Modesto, CA 2.17Stockton, CA 2.11Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 2.10Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 2.06Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 2.04Merced, CA 1.91Reno-Sparks, NV 1.84Bakersfield, CA 1.72Fresno, CA 1.61
Cap Rates
Vacancy Rates
U.S. Net Capital Flows
Income vs. Treasury Yields
Source: LaSalle Investment Management
Cap Rates, Vacancy, Flows & Yields
27 Source: NAREIT, NCREIF; As of March 31, 2011
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Apartment Retail Industrial Office
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Apartment Retail Industrial Office
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
NPI Income NAREIT Equity Dividend Yield 10-Year Treasury
U.S. Cap Rates and Spreads
28Source: NCREIF; As of March 31, 2011
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Spread Long-Term Average
NPI Cap Rate less 10-Yr U.S. Treas
1Q11 Avg. CRE Cap Rate: 7.0%1Q11 Avg. U.S.T. 10-Yr.: 3.5%
Current Spread: +354 bpsHigh Spread: +538 bpsLow Spread: -606 pbsAverage Spread: +173 bps
NCREIF All Property Cap Rates NAREIT Equity Index Dividend Yields
Private/Public Real Estate Buy/Sell Periods
29
Source: NCREIF, NAREIT, Courtland Partners, Ltd
NCREIF data as of March 31, 2011 NAREIT data as of March 31, 2011
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
5.37%1Q08
6.95%1Q10
8.64%1Q02
9.78%2Q95
6.32%4Q89
Average: 7.57%Standard Deviation: 1.05%Green Line: One Standard DeviationYellow Line: Two Standard Deviations
6.1%1Q11
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
13%
14%
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Average: 7.22%Standard Deviation: 1.73%Green Line: One Standard DeviationYellow Line: Two Standard Deviations
13.07%May-74
11.12%Oct-90
5.85%Sep-93 5.45%
Sep-97
3.40%Jan-07 3.48%
Mar-11
10.08%Feb-09
Global Real Estate Securities Regional Performance
30
EPRA Index Performance (rebased to 100)January 1, 1990 – March 31, 2011
Source: EPRA/NAREIT
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Asia Europe North America Global
`
-67.70% Asia-71.56% Europe-69.12% North America-67.25% Global
Peak to Trough:111.56% Asia110.50% Europe174.19% North America136.13% Global
Trough to Current:
Debt Market Conditions
31
CRE Mortgage Debt Maturing & Outstanding
32Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, Trepp, Federal Reserve Flow of Funds and KBW Research
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 201
y
Commercial & Multifamily Mortgage Debt % GDP Long-Term Average
Commercial & Multifamily Mortgage Debt Outstanding as % of GDP
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Reset Schedule ($ bil.)
Source: S&P Case-Shiller Index; February 2011
Home Price Percentage Decline From Market Peak
Source: Credit Suisse
Source: CMSA, JPMorgan, LoanPerformance, Trepp, Inc.
Residential Delinquencies by Loan NumberDelinquency Rates: Residential vs. Commercial (60+ day)
Mortgage Resets, Delinquencies, Home Prices
33
Source: MBA National Delinquency Survey, CMSA
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60%
Composite-20
Composite-10
Las Vegas
Phoenix
Miami
Detroit
Tampa
San Francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Minneapolis
Chicago
Seattle
Portland
Washington
Atlanta
New York
Cleveland
Charlotte
Boston
Denver
Dallas
S&P Case-Shiller Home Prices
Annual CMBS Issuance (US$ bil.)
Source: Commercial Mortgage Alert, CMSA
CMBS Issuance & Spreads
Source: JPMorgan as of March 31, 201134
• A flight to quality has greatly reduced liquidity for allasset-backed paper.
• The collapse in investor demand has caused CMBSspreads to widen dramatically across the risk spectrum.
• CMBS issuance is down more than 90% from 2007peak levels.
• CMBS issuance is projected to total $40-$60 billion in2011, up substantially from $10 billion in 2010.
• AAA CMBS spreads are back to pre-Lehman levels.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Non-U.S.
U.S.
AAA Rated AA Rated A Rated06-07 94 116 13807-07 129 169 18908-07 125 210 28509-07 113 188 25310-07 128 224 31411-07 170 300 45012-07 146 309 46401-08 222 513 71302-08 305 820 1,02003-08 270 915 1,14004-08 224 662 76205-08 203 665 79006-08 270 695 97007-08 311 796 1,19608-08 358 968 1,66809-08 467 1,067 1,66710-08 639 1,649 2,14911-08 1,085 4,120 4,92012-08 910 4,235 5,03501-09 1,173 4,423 5,12302-09 1,181 4,631 5,33103-09 944 4,619 5,31904-09 761 4,981 6,44105-09 719 3,739 4,80906-09 726 4,147 5,17207-09 654 3,504 4,37908-09 671 3,267 3,99709-09 595 2,965 3,41010-09 567 2,707 3,08211-09 630 2,890 3,31012-09 513 3,188 3,71301-10 502 3,232 3,75202-10 478 3,258 3,78303-10 373 3,238 3,76304-10 300 2,875 3,40005-10 414 3,129 3,59406-10 381 3,137 3,60207-10 344 3,189 3,65408-10 331 2,766 3,33009-10 316 2,716 3,36110-10 323 2,219 2,99811-10 310 2,150 2,99012-10 254 1,729 2,36401-11 225 1,355 1,93002-11 197 1,062 1,49703-11 206 1,226 1,710
CMBS Spreads to 10-Yr Treasury
REIT Metrics
35
REIT Metrics
36
Source: FTSE EPRA/NAREIT
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
Mar
-91
Mar
-92
Mar
-93
Mar
-94
Mar
-95
Mar
-96
Mar
-97
Mar
-98
Mar
-99
Mar
-00
Mar
-01
Mar
-02
Mar
-03
Mar
-04
Mar
-05
Mar
-06
Mar
-07
Mar
-08
Mar
-09
Mar
-10
Mar
-11
Global Dividend Yield
Global Dividend Yield Long Term Avg 1 std dev 1-std dev 2 std dev 2-std dev
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Mar
-91
Mar
-92
Mar
-93
Mar
-94
Mar
-95
Mar
-96
Mar
-97
Mar
-98
Mar
-99
Mar
-00
Mar
-01
Mar
-02
Mar
-03
Mar
-04
Mar
-05
Mar
-06
Mar
-07
Mar
-08
Mar
-09
Mar
-10
Mar
-11
Global Premium/Discount to NAV
Premium/Discount Average +1 std dev -1 std dev +2 std dev -2 std dev
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Global FFO Multiple
FFO Multiple Average +1 std dev -1 std dev +2 std dev -2 std dev
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
Mar
-91
Mar
-92
Mar
-93
Mar
-94
Mar
-95
Mar
-96
Mar
-97
Mar
-98
Mar
-99
Mar
-00
Mar
-01
Mar
-02
Mar
-03
Mar
-04
Mar
-05
Mar
-06
Mar
-07
Mar
-08
Mar
-09
Mar
-10
Mar
-11
U.S. Capitalization Rate
Capitalization Rate Average +1 std dev -1 std dev +2 std dev -2 std dev
Madison Sullivan Debt Fund Re-Cap
37
MRC/Sullivan Debt Fund
38
Quasi-Distressed Debt Fund Execute bridge loan financing on capital-constrained
properties Invest in/dispose of mortgages written by third-parties Value add: first mortgage Opportunistic: distressed purchases $300 million of equity with 1.0x-2.0x leverage
Geographic Focus New York City New England Mid Atlantic
MRC/Sullivan Debt Fund
39
Pros of Investment Size of market opportunity for undercapitalized properties Senior position of fund’s capital structure Floating rate transactions hedge against increases in interest
rates/inflation Smaller, off-market transactions Opportunity for strong risk-adjusted returns
Cons of Investment Young management team Concentrated geographic focus Quality of properties Requirement for recovery in real estate market
MRC/Sullivan Debt Fund
40
Transaction February 2010 First mortgage loan on 53-unit apartment buildings purchased
from Citibank at 82 cents on the dollar Quality collateral but borrower default due to other financial
issues Structured transaction with borrower to provide for preferred
return to fund with 40% backend participation Madison now in control of property with borrower as JV
partner Increased rents and now in position to finance out all equity Plan is to convert units to condo units and sell within 2 years Projected IRR: 32.6%; projected multiple: 3.0x over five-year
holding period
Transaction detail/MRC
41
Transaction June 2010 and exited March 2011 Defaulted note purchase transaction First Mortgage loan on mixed-use properties comprised of 335 residential apartments with retail space. Quality Collateral but borrower default due to other financial obligations. Debt yield 10.12% Borrower sold 11 properties in Jan 2011 and refinanced the other 4 properties in March. Actual IRR: 112.13% over 8.5 year holding period Equity multiple 1.73x
Transaction detail/MRC
42
Transaction March 2011 New loan origination Loan Amount $22,500,000, first mortgage construction loan. 80% complete mixed use development comprised of residential, medical office, community facility and valet parking spaces. Borrower came to MRC to recapitalize The underwritten net sellout of the project is $43,990,000, or $504/sf. vs. MRC’s lending basis of $258/sf. Projected levered IRR: 26.6% over 21 months holding period Equity multiple 1.53x