cover sheet caldadll neher: sheet - nrc.gov. robin k. mcguire (rkm.) c.omments: this calculation was...

DESIGN CALCULATION ORANALYSIS COVER SHEET

Project Name: PSEG E~ Applieation Project

~ GabrieUL Torn (GRT)

Reviewer: Robin K. McGuire (R1{M)

CaldADll Neher: 1llll·J:Sp.JmI.2047~

A.~Rav.l

Sheet loCl_

C!)mDlenta: TJds a.Ieu1a~ 1fU prepared by RIsk EJlgineeriDg, a pitt of Fugro Wi1.Iiam Ldtls AuDclsteJ nd is.upported

by ~ fifes in Record No. 2047-.ACRt4J47. T1re Risk Eagineerlng CO'ter shed docwntllts their re1'iew 8lld apprO'ftl

bistary. This MACI'EC cover sheet addreil5es Revision 1 for R&l Reenrd No. 2M7·ACR-046. llevisiool is issued to ehange

termblOJoay from Hope Creek to PSEG Site. Some name clwtgtJI were made witbi. figure titles embeillktJ in Exetl files bI

tb supporihlg docnmtnts. :tnd the lllpporting record 'IfU clanged fu 2047~ACll-4W7t Rev. L Thia toVel' shed d~

approval of Rev. 1 by MACI'EC. Revision 1 'Wa. prepared by John Vlasity (JV) and reviewed by Gabrld Toro (GRT).

~Q Z u bsned to toJ'1"eU a typlJ2'nlPhital ernr. This \'!OVer sheet documenis approval of Rev. 2 by MACTEC. Revision 1

wu prepared by.John VIssity (]V) pd reviewed by Gabriel T()ro (GRT).

As part of the response to MACTEe's Corrective Action Plan for Condition Repo(t PSEG-22, a

MACTEC Design Verification sheet has been compreted and attached. The origlna! design

veriflcition (designated as approval on the REI cover sheet) was reviewed by MACTEC

personnel arid the MACTEC Design Verification sheet was completed to Indicate acceptance

of the REI approval.

This calculation is one of five that were prepared for development of the Ground Motion

Response Spectra (GMRS) as described in Work Instruction 129, A list of all the calculations

associated with the GMRS Is attached, ~ t()/''I/I(J

S\A.bJwt~ ge-n$Itt.lii~ o.f' s~-k A-..... p" fl c.~.;+-'DI\· Fc..vf,,-r> f'w -tk P~S& SI+e e5f -fo [(61/1 S'Oll$ ~ De:; r~~TI.O<\ u.vVl!,5 J8:;r C?/l'z/ f~

Rtv#:o Reason: NA By:RKM Date: Approved: 5IZtlIlO

Rev#: 1 Reasol1: Change terminology from Hope Creek to l'SEG Site By:RKM Data: ~pprID'ed: 5120110 ~?ttl (0

Reason: Correct typographical errol'

:Rev #: Reason: By: Date: ~ Approved:

Rev. 1 1 0-23~09 ?,.o V? ... C'O/) -b/7

CALC-2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-046 Rev 2 - DV Added DCN: ESP 994 of 19

REI CALCULATION RECORD NO.

2047-ACR-032 Rev. 1

2047-ACR-034 Rev. 1

2047-ACR-038 Rev. 1

2047-ACR-040 Rev. 1

2047-ACR-046 Rev. 1

LISTING OF CALCULATIONS PERFORMED UNDER WI 129

(GROUND MOTION RESPONSE SPECTRA)

SUBJECT

Artificial shear-wave velocity profiles for PSEG

Site response calculations

Calculation of site response for the PSEG Site ESP

Calculation of smooth horizontal GMRs for the

PSEG Site

Calculation of smooth vertical GMRs for the PSEG

Site

Sensitivity of Site Amplification Factors for the

PSEG Site ESP to Revisions in Degradation Curves

MACTEC CALCULATION NO. ASSIGNED

2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-032 Rev. 1

2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-034 Rev. 1

2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-038 Rev. 1

2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-040 Rev. 1

2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-046 Rev. 1


~~fMACTEC 2~5 (- ES?- /2-&1. - Zc() 4-:1 - A-e-i ~ rJ4c" k?",.J Z

DESIGN VERIFICATION CONTROL SHEET

Design Verification Checklist (excer :>ted from ANSI N.45.11 [1974 Edition] and ASME NQA~1.1994 Edition

Yes No N/A Design Verification Element

Note: Any items checked "No" automatically imply the design is not verified,

.,::. Is the person performing the design verification qualified to originate the document?

..;. Is the design verification being performed by someone other than the supervisor of the originator?

>< Were the design inputs correctly selected and incorporated into design?

Are assumptions necessary to perform the design activity adequately described and

>( reasonable? Where necessary, are assumptions identified for subsequent re-verifications when the detailed design activities are completed?

K Are the appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements specified?

)L Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements including issue and addenda properly identified, and their requirements for design met?

~ Have applicable construction and operating experiences been considered?

~ Have the design interface requirements been satisfied?

>Z Were appropriate design methods and computer programs used?

x:: Is the design output reasonable compared to design inputs?

~ Are the specified parts, equipment, and processes suitable for the required application?

Y- Are the specified materials compatible with each other and the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed?

y Have adequate maintenance features and requirements been specified?

x: Are accessibility and other desigTl provisions adequate for penormance of needed maintenance and repair?

~ Have adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be required during the plant life?

X Has the design properly considered radiation exposure to the public and plant personnel?

X: :\re till' ~C:Ct'ptailct crik'lill inCClT()r<;l(:d inlhc des!!:'I] dllCIIJl1<..'l1h ;;ufficilOnf to allml verification that desilSll requirements have been satisfactorily accomplished?

>(' Have adequate pre-operational and subsequent periodic test requirements been appropriately specified?

>< Have adequate handling, storage, cleaning, and shipping requirements been specified?

>< Are adequate identification requirements specified?

>( Are requirements for record preparation review, acceptancej'etentiOl1, etc., adequately specified?

Verified by: _~}tt~tiA.,. ~::!--</.=_-__ Date: 10/13110 Approved by: __ p~-_ Date: /() jlflpa f / v ~~

S&L Acceptance Review: Name: Dan Kocunik Sign:_~ Date: I{);/;U. CALC-22S1-ESPREI-2047-ACR-046 Rev 2 - DV Added DeN: ESP 994 of 19

lI'MACTEC DESIGN CALCULATION OR ANALYSIS COVER SHEET

Project Name: PSEG ESP Application Project

Nuclear Safety Clas.sificatlon:

@ NSR AO

Project Number: ~8-2251

..

CaldAnls NUlllber: ml·ESP~REI-204'1~ ACR-646. Rev. 2

Discipline: SeismQlogy

Originator: Gabriel R. Toro (GRT) Origination Date: 2--J.l..lOIO PciDcipal Professional: J. Allan Tiee

Reviewer. Robin K. McGuire (RKM.)

C.omments: This calculation was prepared by Risk Engineering, a part of Fugro William Lettis Associ2tes and is snpported by electronic files in Record N 0. 2047·ACR~047. The:Ridt Enginilering coversheet documents their review and approval history. This MACTEC cover sheet addresses Revision 1 for RElRecord No.2047-ACR-046. ReVision 1 is issul!d to change terminology from Hope Creek to PSEG Site. 8{)me name chan~ were made withln figure titles embedded in Excel files in the suppo:rting doeu:meats., and the supporting record Wa.5 changed to Z047.ACR"{)47. Rev. 1. thiS cover sheet dacum~llts approval of Rev. 1 by MACTEC. Revision 1 was prepared by John Vlasity (JV) and rev(~wed by Gabriel Toro (CRT). Revision :1 is issued to Ct>rreet; a typographiesl error. This cover sheet documents approval of Rev. 1 by MACl'EC. Revision 2 was prepared by John Vlasity (JV) and reviewed by Gabriel Toro (GRT).

5Q.-h.$:. +i ,,;-\11 0+ $" I+e.. ·Afr\.. f'\\. fl C.~t~11 rac..JZt;s -fuv f!.e C",+e.. ESP -to R.e-VlSl t::Jn<,. /... De, tUb-tiM Curves

. jtJj- 917-1/"

Rev#: 0 Reason: NA By:RKM Date: Approved: 5120/10

Rev#: 1 Reason: Change terminology from Hope Creek to PSEG Site By:RKM Date: ~l'O~ed: .... . ... ..... - ., _. , .... ' .... 5If0J10 ... . _.~%4(o.

Rev#:2 Reason: Correct typographical error By: fZ.r».- ~r:rlt~ I~r~ed: Yl¢/t" Rev#: Reason: By: Date: 1fI Approved:

Rev. 1 10-23-09

CALC-2251-ESP-REI-2047 -ACR-046 Rev 2 - DV Added DCN: ESP 994 of 19

RISK ENGINEERING, INC. V: PROJECT ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION RECORD

Title: Sensitivity of Site Amplification Factorsfor the PSEG Site ESP to Revisions ill Degradation Curves

Record No. _2047~ACR- 046 Rev. 2 . (calcs)

Record No. 2047-ACR- 047 Rev. I (dec. files)

--

Rev. Status Date Description 0 Final 12-12-2010 ilnitial issue 1 Final 5-19-2010 Clarification of site name ') Final 15-24-2010 ./!J.Pr£Tl?'C {"d""A.t~~+S F-

E ------------.-

* Approval for release of results

Description of work: 1. Are objectives clearly stated? 2. Are inputs correctly selected, stated, and referenced?

I

p;fI Rev. App:;l By by by I

GRT I RKM I RKM I JAV 'GRT RKM I

.AY-t.6 TC..I -~

'1= 1-.,---- r-----

L

Reviewer Initials

GRr GR.,'

3. Are literature searches and background infolmation cOITlpleteiy described? GRi GR\ Gl<:-r-

4. Are assumptions completely described and referenced? 5. Is an appropriate computer program used for analysis? 6. Are appropriate methods/equations used for hand calculations? 7. Are the results reasonable, considering the input?

6T2.\ GRT

8. Have mathematical checks been made to ensure the accuracy of the results'? G~I G \(. T 9. Have the accuracy and conclusions been confim1ed?

All calculations shall fully describe: 1. Objectives of analysis. 2. Design inputs, sources, and references. 3. Literature searches and background information. 4. Assumptions, basis for assumptions, and references. 5. If computer calculations, program name and version name. 6. If hand calculations, equations used and outputs.

2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2

CALC-2251-ESP-REI-2047-ACR-046 Rev 2 - DV AddedDCN: ESP 994 of 19

2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 2

Sensitivity of Site Amplification Factors for the PSEG Site ESP to Revisions in Degradation Curves 1. Objectives of analysis. Investigate the effect of revised G/Gmax curves, and damping curves on the amplification factors at the top of the Competent Layer. Consider only the 1E-5 High-Frequency (HF) and Low-Frequency (LF) motions (for 5% damping). This calculation includes the generation of revised synthetic profiles and site-response calculations using these profiles. 2. Inputs.

1. Original inputs for soil-profile randomization from Reference 2. 2. Updated degradation properties from Ref. 11. 3. 1E-5 HF and LF spectra (for 5% damping) and hazard de-aggregation results from

Ref. 1. 4. Fourier spectra, durations, and effective strain ratios corresponding to inputs item 3

above from Ref. 9. 5. Original site-response results from Reference 9.

3. Literature search and background information. The application of RVT to site response has been studied by Schneider et al. (1991; Ref. 3), Stepp et al. (1991; Ref. 4), Silva et al. (1997; Ref. 5), and Rathje and Ozbey (2006; Ref. 6). 4. Assumptions and basis.

1. The assumption of vertically-propagating shear waves is appropriate for the characterization of site response at the PSEG Site. The basis is that this is the same procedure that is implemented in the SHAKE program and that constitutes the standard practice for site-response calculations.

2. The use of RVT for equivalent-linear site-response calculations yields valid results. The basis is the results in Refs. 3-6.

3. In the calculation of ground motion duration, values of crustal shear-wave velocity and seismic stress drop typical of Eastern North America will be used. The basis is that the site is located in this region.

5. Computer calculations: SOILSIM v. 1.4 and RVTSITE v.1.2 were used to perform all calculations. The following are the steps for the computer calculations:

1. Modify the SOILSIM input file from Ref. 2 to incorporate the revised degradation curves from Ref. 11. Appendix A shows a difference listing between the original and revised files.


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 3

2. Run SOILSIM 1.4 to generate synthetic profiles using the new degradation parameters. These profiles are identical to the original synthetic profiles in their Vs, unit weights, and layering.

3. Perform site-response calculations using the synthetic profiles from step 2 and the 1E-5 HF, and LF Fourier spectra rock motions, durations, and effective strain ratios developed in Ref. 9. Separate amplification factors are obtained for HF and LF and for each synthetic profile.

Input and output files for these steps are contained in Ref. 10. 6. Hand calculations The following are the steps for the hand calculations:

1. Calculate logarithmic means and standard deviations from the site-response results. Separate results are obtained for HF and LF.

2. Compare these results to the corresponding original results in Ref. 12. Comparisons for HF and LF are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively, and presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Detailed comparisons of the Original and Updated results in Ref. 10 (considering all calculated frequencies, not only the frequencies in Tables 1 and 2) indicates the following:

� For the HF inputs, the change from the Original to the Updated results is a +0.2% or less at frequencies below 1 Hz and -3.9% or less at higher frequencies.

� For the LF inputs, the changes are +0.1% or less at frequencies below 1 Hz and -2.9% or less at higher frequencies.

� The changes in logarithmic standard deviations are also small, namely between -1.7% to +1.1%.

Files associated with these steps are contained in Ref. 10. 7. Conclusions It is concluded that the changes in the 1E-5 amplification factors as a result of revisions to the G/Gmax and damping degradation curves are very small. Therefore, the corresponding changes to the GMRS spectrum are equally small. Also, changes in both mean amplification factors and standard deviations at frequencies above 1 Hz are negative, meaning that previous results for frequencies above 1 Hz are conservative. References

1. Risk Engineering, Inc. (2009). High frequency and low frequency horizontal rock spectra, REI QA record 2047-ACR-024 Rev. 1.

2. Risk Engineering, Inc. (2010). Artificial Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles for PSEG Site Response Calculations. REI QA record 2047-ACR-032 Rev. 1.


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 4

3. Schneider, J. F., Silva, W. J., Chiou, S. J., and Stepp, J. C. (1991). “Estimation of ground motion at close distances using the band-limited white-noise model.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation, Vol. 4, EERI, Stanford, Calif., 187–194.

4. Stepp, J. C., Silva, W. J., Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., McGuire, R., and Schneider, J. (1991). “Site response evaluations based upon generic soil profiles using random vibration methodology.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation, Vol. 4, Stanford, Calif., 739–746.

5. Silva, W. J., Abrahamson, N., Toro, G., and Costantino, C. (1997). “Description and validation of the stochastic ground motion model, Final report.” Brookhaven National Laboratory, Rep. Contract No. 770573, Associated Universities, Inc., Upton, N.Y.

6. Rathje, E.M., and M.C. Ozbey (2006). Site-Specific Validation of Random Vibration Theory-Based Seismic Site Response Analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 7, July.

7. Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I. (1992). SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.

8. Kramer, Steven L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall. 9. Risk Engineering, Inc. (2009). Electronic files for Calculation of Site Response for

the PSEG Site, REI QA record 2047-ACR-035 Rev. 1. 10. Risk Engineering, Inc. (2010). Electronic files for the Calculation of Sensitivity of

Site Amplification Factors for the PSEG Site ESP to Revisions in Degradation Curves, REI QA record 2047-ACR-047 Rev. 1.

11. Mactec, Inc. (2010). Work Instruction for Task A. Risk Engineering QA record 2047-EXD-004.

12. Risk Engineering, Inc. (2010). Calculation of Site Response for the PSEG Site ESP. REI QA record 2047-ACR-034 Rev. 1.


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 5

Comparison of Median Amplification Factors forPSEG Site GMRS HF

0.1

1

10

Am

plifi

catio

n Fa

ctor 1E-5 Original

1E-5 Updated

Ratio (Upd/Orig)

Comparison of Std. Dev. of ln[Amplification Factor] for PSEG SiteGMRS HF

00.20.40.60.8

11.2

0.1 1 10 100Frequency (Hz)

Sigm

a(ln

)

Figure 1. Comparison of original and updated results for High Frequency (HF).


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 6

Comparison of Median Amplification Factors forPSEG Site GMRS LF

0.1

1

10

Am

plifi

catio

n Fa

ctor 1E-5 Original

1E-5 Updated

Ratio (Upd/Orig)

Comparison of Std. Dev. of ln[Amplification Factor] for PSEG SiteGMRS LF

00.20.40.60.8

11.2

0.1 1 10 100Frequency (Hz)

Sigm

a(ln

)

Figure 2. Comparison of original and updated results for Low Frequency (LF).


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 7

Table 1. Comparison of Original and Updated Amplification factors for High-Frequency Rock Motions

Log, Mean Amplification Factors Logarithmic Std. Deviations

Freq (Hz) 1E-5

Original 1E-5

Updated Ratio

(Upd/Orig) 1E-5

Original 1E-5

Updated Ratio

(Upd/Orig) 100 0.801 0.784 0.978 0.231 0.230 0.994 90 0.728 0.712 0.978 0.233 0.232 0.994 80 0.632 0.618 0.977 0.237 0.235 0.993 70 0.531 0.519 0.976 0.246 0.244 0.991 60 0.450 0.438 0.973 0.263 0.260 0.988 50 0.407 0.395 0.969 0.291 0.287 0.986 45 0.401 0.388 0.968 0.308 0.304 0.987 40 0.409 0.395 0.965 0.327 0.323 0.987 35 0.435 0.418 0.962 0.338 0.336 0.993 30 0.472 0.455 0.963 0.351 0.350 0.997 25 0.543 0.522 0.962 0.339 0.340 1.002 20 0.666 0.643 0.966 0.330 0.331 1.002 15 0.832 0.807 0.970 0.304 0.304 1.001

12.5 0.938 0.916 0.977 0.269 0.271 1.005 10 1.072 1.050 0.979 0.248 0.249 1.002 9 1.180 1.157 0.981 0.249 0.250 1.004 8 1.299 1.275 0.982 0.237 0.238 1.004 7 1.428 1.404 0.983 0.237 0.238 1.004 6 1.544 1.522 0.986 0.202 0.202 1.001 5 1.647 1.627 0.988 0.262 0.258 0.983 4 1.572 1.563 0.994 0.316 0.313 0.989 3 1.395 1.394 0.999 0.243 0.246 1.010

2.5 1.405 1.403 0.999 0.266 0.267 1.005 2 1.599 1.595 0.997 0.245 0.246 1.005

1.5 1.872 1.868 0.998 0.236 0.236 1.001 1.25 2.001 1.997 0.998 0.246 0.246 1.002

1 2.194 2.193 1.000 0.246 0.245 0.994 0.9 2.112 2.113 1.000 0.256 0.255 0.997 0.8 2.024 2.026 1.001 0.233 0.233 0.999 0.7 2.048 2.050 1.001 0.232 0.232 0.998 0.6 2.214 2.217 1.001 0.230 0.230 1.000 0.5 2.479 2.482 1.001 0.238 0.238 1.000 0.4 2.838 2.842 1.001 0.309 0.309 1.000 0.3 2.441 2.445 1.002 0.387 0.387 1.001 0.2 1.671 1.673 1.001 0.327 0.327 1.002 0.15 1.417 1.418 1.001 0.185 0.186 1.003

0.125 1.365 1.366 1.001 0.139 0.140 1.003 0.1 1.342 1.342 1.000 0.108 0.109 1.003


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 8

Table 2. Comparison of Original and Updated Amplification factors for Low-Frequency Rock Motions

Log, Mean Amplification Factors Logarithmic Std. Deviations Freq (Hz)

1E-5 Original

1E-5 Updated

Ratio (Upd/Orig)

1E-5 Original

1E-5 Updated

Ratio (Upd/Orig)

100 0.975 0.960 0.985 0.203 0.202 0.994 90 0.901 0.887 0.984 0.204 0.203 0.994 80 0.797 0.784 0.984 0.207 0.206 0.992 70 0.681 0.669 0.983 0.213 0.211 0.991 60 0.583 0.572 0.981 0.225 0.222 0.988 50 0.529 0.518 0.979 0.244 0.241 0.985 45 0.520 0.508 0.977 0.257 0.253 0.986 40 0.526 0.513 0.975 0.273 0.269 0.985 35 0.548 0.533 0.973 0.281 0.278 0.988 30 0.580 0.564 0.972 0.295 0.292 0.990 25 0.639 0.621 0.971 0.295 0.294 0.995 20 0.745 0.724 0.972 0.297 0.296 0.998 15 0.894 0.872 0.975 0.292 0.292 1.001

12.5 0.986 0.965 0.979 0.262 0.264 1.005 10 1.122 1.101 0.981 0.250 0.250 1.003 9 1.219 1.196 0.981 0.247 0.249 1.006 8 1.332 1.309 0.983 0.237 0.238 1.005 7 1.454 1.431 0.984 0.237 0.238 1.004 6 1.555 1.534 0.986 0.207 0.207 1.000 5 1.618 1.599 0.988 0.269 0.266 0.986 4 1.552 1.543 0.994 0.317 0.314 0.992 3 1.379 1.377 0.999 0.236 0.238 1.011

2.5 1.404 1.401 0.998 0.268 0.270 1.004 2 1.584 1.579 0.997 0.244 0.246 1.005

1.5 1.859 1.854 0.997 0.237 0.237 1.001 1.25 1.981 1.977 0.998 0.245 0.245 1.002

1 2.101 2.099 0.999 0.213 0.211 0.994 0.9 2.079 2.080 1.000 0.242 0.241 0.998 0.8 2.006 2.008 1.001 0.224 0.224 0.999 0.7 2.036 2.037 1.000 0.229 0.228 0.997 0.6 2.204 2.206 1.001 0.236 0.236 1.000 0.5 2.518 2.519 1.000 0.264 0.263 0.999 0.4 2.744 2.745 1.000 0.302 0.302 1.000 0.3 2.311 2.312 1.000 0.372 0.372 1.000 0.2 1.555 1.556 1.001 0.309 0.309 1.000

0.15 1.302 1.302 1.000 0.173 0.173 1.001 0.125 1.228 1.229 1.001 0.125 0.125 1.000

0.1 1.175 1.175 1.000 0.089 0.089 1.000


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 9

Appendix A: Difference Listing Between SOILSIM Input Files

Differences between original (Hope_Creek.inp) and revised (Hope_Creek_SENS.inp) input files for SOILSIM. Black=unchanged; red=removed from original; blue=added to new.

The PSEG Site lies adjacent to the existing Hope Creek Site. References to computer files labeled “Hope Creek” apply and represent the PSEG Site being studied.


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 10

SOILSIM INPUT FILE FOR HOPE CREEK ESP - SENSITIVITY TOUPDATED DEGRADATION CURVES HOPE CREEK ESP - UPDATED DEGRADATION CURVES 137 ! Seed 3 0.7 ! IR_LYR 60 ! NSIM 452 574 1 ! Line 6 Depths to bedrock & IDEP_RAND 6 2804.16 1E-6 2.4028 ! ICURV_ROCK VEL_ROCK SIG_ROCK DENS_ROCK 16 ! ICAT 152 ! NLAYER 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 1 1.28778 685.8 1.93842 ! Layer 1 (Tvt, Tht and Knv) - Top of Competent Layer for GMRS 2 1.4097 1194.816 2.09862 ! Layer 2 (Kml) 2 1.4097 1194.816 2.09862 ! Layer 2 (Kml) 2 1.4097 1194.816 2.09862 ! Layer 2 (Kml) 2 1.4097 1194.816 2.09862 ! Layer 2 (Kml)


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 11

2 1.31064 758.952 2.09862 ! Layer 3 (Kml) 2 1.31064 758.952 2.09862 ! Layer 3 (Kml) 2 1.31064 758.952 2.09862 ! Layer 3 (Kml) 2 1.31064 758.952 2.09862 ! Layer 3 (Kml) 2 1.31064 758.952 2.09862 ! Layer 3 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.31445 920.496 2.09862 ! Layer 4 (Kml) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 2 1.25984 758.952 2.05056 ! Layer 5 (Kml, Kwn, Kmt) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.28016 521.208 2.0025 ! Layer 6 (Ket, Kwb) 3 1.58496 697.992 2.0826 ! Layer 7 ( Kmv) 3 1.58496 697.992 2.0826 ! Layer 7 ( Kmv) 3 1.58496 697.992 2.0826 ! Layer 7 ( Kmv) 3 1.58496 697.992 2.0826 ! Layer 7 ( Kmv) 3 1.58496 697.992 2.0826 ! Layer 7 ( Kmv) 3 1.524 542.544 2.0826 ! Layer 8 (Kmg) 3 1.524 542.544 2.0826 ! Layer 8 (Kmg) 3 1.524 542.544 2.0826 ! Layer 8 (Kmg) 3 1.524 542.544 2.0826 ! Layer 8 (Kmg)


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 12

3 1.524 542.544 2.0826 ! Layer 8 (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 1.5748 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9A (Kmg) 4 3.8862 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9B (Kp) 4 3.8862 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9B (Kp) 4 3.8862 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9B (Kp) 4 3.8862 758.952 2.0826 ! Layer 9B (Kp) 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 5.5626 670.56 2.1627 ! Upper 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 6.5532 801.624 2.1627 ! Middle 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 13

5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower 5 10.668 932.688 2.1627 ! Lower (blank lines removed) 6 ! Nsoil 0.0316 0.15 0 ! properties for Layer 1 0.0316 0.29 0.15 ! properties for Layer 1 -0.75 0.0316 0.14 0 ! properties for Layers 2-5 0.0316 0.31 0.15 ! properties for Layers 2-5 -0.75 0.0316 0.1 0 ! properties for Layers 6-8 0.0316 0.4 0.15 ! properties for Layers 6-8 -0.75 0.0316 0.13 0 ! properties for Layers 9a-9b 0.0316 0.34 0.15 ! properties for Layers 9a-9b -0.75 0.0316 0.0000000001 0 ! properties for Deep Profile 0.0316 0.35 0.15 ! properties for Deep Profile -0.75 0.0316 0.0000000001 0 ! properties for Bedrock 0.0316 0.35 0.15 ! properties for Bedrock -0.75 11 values of G/Gmax for Layer 1 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.996813158 0.990879725 0.974155102 0.929039285 0.819561823 0.612062062 0.508573273 0.353727574 0.159759123 0.110899724 0.061874838 0.996481178 0.989935886 0.971530191 0.922198246 0.804388602 0.588208015 0.483725393 0.331341646 0.146859426 0.101469014 0.056348626 11 values of damping ratio for Layer 1 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.009957499 0.010512638 0.0122514 0.017565037 0.032833028 0.069946534 0.092981527 0.134674874 0.203717781 0.224642392 0.245774753 0.010897636 0.011515847 0.013449834 0.019338882 0.036091726 0.075869482 0.099951301 0.142479175 0.210032899 0.22969456 0.248857054 11 values of G/Gmax for Layers 2-5 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 14

0.997328652 0.992347623 0.978255744 0.939856144 0.844269631 0.653157407 0.552614725 0.395146452 0.184965479 0.129585413 0.072978925 0.997182582 0.991931392 0.977090714 0.936766722 0.837121061 0.640967161 0.539383866 0.382461311 0.17705276 0.123682508 0.069448631 11 values of damping ratio for Layers 2-5 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.008480526 0.008938837 0.010376985 0.014796457 0.027696145 0.060265565 0.081330936 0.121111864 0.192022112 0.215074459 0.239747044 0.008901355 0.009386956 0.010909939 0.015582757 0.029161118 0.063071001 0.084741334 0.125152553 0.195608835 0.218038693 0.24164208 11 values of G/Gmax for Layers 6-8 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.998802953 0.996561444 0.990152329 0.972163778 0.923758741 0.808009808 0.734068907 0.593504625 0.33651083 0.249648247 0.149617623 0.998761859 0.996443674 0.989817292 0.971234516 0.921344298 0.802712739 0.727420408 0.585326409 0.329007907 0.243372015 0.145368594 11 values of damping ratio for Layers 6-8 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.010676782 0.010868292 0.011472343 0.013357898 0.019118529 0.035504482 0.04768214 0.074718571 0.140845004 0.169857011 0.208846093 0.011008034 0.011206704 0.011833252 0.013788195 0.019753196 0.036660547 0.049171059 0.07679105 0.143519628 0.172446899 0.210968739 11 values of G/Gmax for Layers 9a-9b 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.997843374 0.993816149 0.982380554 0.950899554 0.870445089 0.700041422 0.604863624 0.447401367 0.219511969 0.155764113 0.088891009 0.997786258 0.993653055 0.98192134 0.949661903 0.867462109 0.694512058 0.598586309 0.440933973 0.215056906 0.152350429 0.086792086 11 values of damping ratio for Layers 9a-9b 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.006980695 0.007343898 0.00848569 0.012013872 0.022476513 0.049965038 0.068556423 0.105412724 0.177159419 0.202495491 0.231417678 0.007148551 0.007522221 0.008696677 0.012323581 0.023060007 0.051140883 0.070035442 0.107278275 0.179008594 0.204087128 0.232497849 11 values of G/Gmax for Deep Profile 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 values of damping ratio for Deep Profile


2047-ACR-046 Rev. 2 15

1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 11 values of G/Gmax for Bedrock 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 values of damping ratio for Bedrock 1.00E-04 3.16E-04 1.00E-03 3.16E-03 1.00E-02 3.16E-02 5.00E-02 1.00E-01 3.16E-01 5.00E-01 1.00E+00 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005


cover sheet caldadll neher: sheet - nrc.gov. robin k. mcguire (rkm.) c.omments: this calculation was...

Documents