critical anaylsis 1
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Critical Anaylsis 1
1/3
Grover 1
Denise Grover
Mrs. Alampi-Cortez
Critical Analysis
4 January 2013
Was Joseph Conrad a Raciest?
It can be said that Joseph Conrad has included racism within his literature, however there
are arguments both for and against this. Heart of Darkness is a novella telling a story of a man's
journey through Africa. Whilst traveling the protagonist comes in contact with many different
individuals some native to Africa, while others are from varying European countries. Marlow
and his fellow Europeans are civilizing the natives, or that is what they believe their goal was.
While reading this novella its important to remember it was written within the late 19 th/early 20th
century, and that attitudes and language towards the native peoples were different to what they
are now.
There are some scenes in the novella which can clearly be interpreted as being overtly
racist. For example at the first station the building goes up in flames and the incident is blamed
on the native when it is apparent it is not his fault (Conrad 20). The black man is beaten horribly
as a result. I believe rather than this showing Conrad as being racist it exemplifies how people
were treated at the time; with the intention for the audience to feel sympathy with the native
character.
The way the natives talk is also very important as it changes from savage to
civilized as the novel progresses; showing the growth of the protagonist and the acceptance of
-
7/28/2019 Critical Anaylsis 1
2/3
Grover 2
the natives culture. In the beginning none of the natives are doing anything more than screaming
and grunting, but the Cannibals use words, even if they may be saying they want to eat other
Africans (Achebe 3). This is used to show the authors viewpoint that the two races can be
reconciled, and his intention through character development and the progression of the storyline
to bring the audience in line with his view
Although there is verbal racism this does not necessarily mean there is a physical racism
due to the fact that some characters use these terms but treat the native characters fairly. Conrad
wrote himself into his novel as Marlow. Marlow never shows any ill will towards the natives and
there are other characters in the story that actually want to help the Africans(Achebe 4). For
example the Manager and the Nephew, both of which truly believe they are there to help the
natives (Conrad 27). Conrad may be using any racism in the novel for dramatic effect to
emphasize the ill will Europeans have toward the natives of Africa. It is likely it could be a sign
of the times, and though people are labeled in such ways it doesn't mean they are thought of or
treated differently. Conrad values work above race because he repeats the ideas and the
positivity of work more than he mentions skin color (Conrad 24).
Conrad uses other characters to point out the positive qualities in Marlow. Kurtz is an
example of this, in the beginning you are given the impression that Kurtz and Marlow are similar
(Conrad 16). Though as the novel progresses the truth about Kurtz comes out, he is a Crazy frail
man who is close to death and sees the wrongs he as done at this point (Conrad 62). In the end
Marlow and Kurtz are very different as Marlow makes it out sane enough to tell the tale of horror
he lived through. This is a microcosm illustrated between the traditional thinkers who believe
that black people were inferior, to the people like Marlow , and Conrad , who came from the
-
7/28/2019 Critical Anaylsis 1
3/3
Grover 3
same roots but treated Africans more fairly. This scenario shows that Conrad believes that the
time of the black oppressors is ending and that in the future natives will be treated more fairly.
Some critics such as Achebe suggest that Conrad uses an abundance of racist words and
believes that this shows he is racist. When Conrad is describing the natives he can be very
detailed. He points out the skin color often; almost to a point where its awkward (Achebe 5).
Repetition of some racist terms throughout the work can be seen as an ironic way to emphasize
the fact that they are incorrect. The language he is using may also be characteristic of the society
he is in rather than being directly racist.
In conclusion we have found out that Conrad did not have racist intentions when writing
this novella.The racism we see in the novel is largely down to two reasons. Firstly, the terms
used which may be seen as racist now but at the time were socially acceptable. Secondly, the
racism was used for dramatic effect to place emphasis on what was being done was morally
wrong. Overall critics such as Achebe was wrong and misinterpreted Conrads style, which i
believe was an effective way of putting his point across that he believed the native people are not
inferior.