crosscheck in use at the jbjs
DESCRIPTION
Cathy Griffin, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, on the CrossCheck Panel at the Annual Meeting 2009TRANSCRIPT
Cathy Griffin
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
JBJS STATS
Approximately 2000 submissions annually
More than half from outside US
Acceptance rate approximately 10%
Approximately 1000 active reviewers
Why Cross Check?
Increasing detection of duplicate submissions and/or plagiarized material
Limited resources
Editor fatigue
How much is too much?
“Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media.” (icmge.org)
CrossCheck Screening Results
Less than 2% declined for egregious duplication of uncited publication(s)
Declined – No citations
CrossCheck Screening Results
Approximately 3% returned for explanation, correction, additional citations and/or rephrasing
Returned For Editing
CrossCheck Screening Results
Follow-up studies and data mined studies get a pass
Accepted - Data Mining
Accepted - Follow Up Study
Summary of Findings
Rate of declined manuscripts relatively low
Authors are not uniformly educated on the subject
Research, research, research
Goals Going Forward
Increased scrutiny a deterrent
Raising consciousness
Decreased publication of plagiarized material