cscl 2011 keynote on social computing and elearning
DESCRIPTION
Ed H. ChiGoogle Research (Work done at Xerox PARC)CSCL2011 Keynote Abstract:Our research in Augmented Social Cognition is aimed at enhancing the ability of a group of people to remember, think, and reason. Our approach to creating this augmentation or enhancement is primarily model-driven. Our system developments are informed by models such as information scent, sensemaking, information theory, probabilistic models, and more recently, evolutionary dynamic models. These models have been used to understand a wide variety of user behaviors, from individuals interacting with social bookmark search in Delicious and MrTaggy.com to groups of people working on articles in Wikipedia. These models range in complexity from a simple set of assumptions to complex equations describing human and group behaviors.Indeed, increasingly, new social online resources such as social bookmarking sites and Wikis are becoming central in eLearning. By studying them, we further our understanding of how knowledge is constructed in a social context. In this talk, I will illustrate how a model-driven approach could help illuminate the path forward for social computing and social learning.-----TRANSCRIPT
CSCL 2011 | Keynote Augmented Social Cognition: How Social Computing is Changing eLearning
Ed H. Chi
Google Research Work done while at Palo Alto Research Center (PARC)
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Prelude: A personal learning story To: [email protected] From: Brad Barrish <brad@…removed.for.privacy….com> Subject: Pancreatic cancer Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 21:37:55 PST Hey Ed. I'm a fellow del.icio.us user and noticed you bookmark a lot of pancreatic cancer stuff. I'm at home with my dad who was diagnosed a little over a year ago and is now at the tale end of things. I've learned a lot through his treatments and about what's out there. I dunno if it's something you or a family member has, but just wanted to drop you an email. Be well. Brad
Talk in 3 Acts
n Act I: The Invisible – Social Search
n Act II: The Visible – Shared Annotations
n Act III: The Abstracted – Shared Knowledge Space
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
The Importance of Social Signals in eLearning
Act I: Invisible Social Signals from the Crowd
Joint work w/ Todd Mytkowicz, Rowan Nairn, Lawrence Lee [Chi and Mytkowicz, Hypertext2008] [Kammerer et al., CHI2009]
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Using Information Theory to Model Social Tagging [Ed H. Chi, Todd Mytkowicz, ACM Hypertext 2008]
Topics Concepts
Users Documents
Tags T1…Tn
Encoding Decoding
Noise
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Tagging Behavior
H(Tag) shows tag saturation H(Doc | Tag), browsability
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Implication
I(Doc; Tag) Mutual Information Raise in avg. tag / bookmark
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
TagSearch: MapReduce Implementation
n Spreading Activation in a bi-‐graph n Computation over a very large data set
– 150 Million+ bookmarks
Tags URLs
P(URL|Tag)
P(Tag|URL)
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13
Guide
Web
Howto
Tips Help
Tools
Tip
Tricks
Tutorial
Tutorials
Reference
Semantic Similarity Graph
TagSearch: Use Semantic Analysis to Reduce Noise http://mrtaggy.com
CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Experiment Design [Kammerer et al. CHI2009]
n 2 interface x 3 task domain design – 2 Interface (between-‐subjects)
n Exploratory vs. Baseline – 3 task domains (within-‐subjects)
n Future Architecture, Global Warming, Web Mashups
n 30 Subjects (22 male, 8 female) – Intermediate or advanced computer and web search skills – Half assigned Exploratory, half Baseline.
n For each domain, single block with 3 task types: – Easy and Difficult Page Collection Task [6min each] – Summarization Task [12min] – Keyword Generation Task [2min]
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Evauation Results [Kammerer et al., CHI2009] n Exploratory interface users:
– performed more queries, – took more time, – wrote better summaries (in 2/3 domains), – generated more relevant keywords (in 2/3 domains), and – had a higher cognitive load.
n Suggestive of deeper engagement and better learning. n Some evidence of scaffolding for novices in the keyword
generation and summarization tasks.
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Act II: Visible Social Signals from Shared Highlighting
Kudos to Lichan Hong, Les Nelson
[Hong et al, AVI2008] [Nelson et al., HCII 2009]
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Finding a Restaurant
n Appropriate for the occasion
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Poor heuristic
Good heuristic
Heuristics
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
“Hints”
Solo
Cooperative (“good hints”)
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
SparTag.us: Social Highlighting
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
SparTag.us: Social Highlighting
n In situ tagging while reading n Highlighting n Shared notebooking n Sharing!
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Highlighting as Importance Indicator
recall
first-visit
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
n Sensemaking task – Find and read material about “Enterprise 2.0 mashups” in order to
write two essays
n Seeds: “expert” content for scaffolding – Tags from del.icio.us – URLs from Google/PageRank – Constructed and then shared through social mechanisms (i.e., a
SparTag.us “friend”)
n Performance Measures – Learning gain: Pre/Post Knowledge Test
Evaluation Task & Metric [Nelson et al., HCII2009]
scorePretest - scoreMax scorePretest -scorePosttest
=Gain
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Procedure
Demographics & Pretest
SF SparTag.us with ‘Friend’
SO SparTag.us Only
WS Without SparTag.us
Posttest
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Results: Learning Gain N=18 SparTag.us + Friend superior to both individual conditions No difference between the two control conditions
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
URL Kind Code Blog B Conference C Employment E MySpartagus M News N OpenSource O Search S Vendor V Wikipedia W Consultant X
Observation URL Kind Code Blog B Conference C Employment E My.Spartag.us M News N OpenSource O Search S Vendor V Wikipedia W Consultant X
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Von Restorff Isolation Effect [1933] n As applied to highlights, the von Restorff isolation effect
suggests that readers: n (a) tend to focus on and n (b) learn what is marked, n whether the information is important or not.
– Nist and Hogrebe 87
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Act III: Abstracted Knowledge: The Science of Understanding Wikipedia
Kudos to Bongwon Suh, Niki Kittur [Kittur et al., CHI2007] [Suh et al., WikiSym 2009]
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Exponential Growth of Wikipedia: an accepted ‘fact’
Number of Articles (Log Scale)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Modelling_Wikipedia’s_growth
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Growth of Edits
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Something happened in early 2007
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Growth of Active Editors *In thousands
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Slowing Growth in Global Activity *In thousands
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Earlier Exponential Growth Model n Preferential Attachment: Edits beget edits
– more number of previous edits, more number of new edits
Growth rate of population
Current population
Growth rate depends on: N = current population r = growth rate of the population
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
!
dNdt
= r " N
!
N(t) = N0 " ert
Logistic Growth Model n Ecological population growth model
– Also depend on environmental conditions – K, carrying capacity (due to resource limitation)
!
dNdt
= rN(1" NK)
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Match to Data: # of New Articles n Follows a logistic growth curve
New Article
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Struggle for Existence -‐ Darwin n Biological system
– Competition increases as population hit the limits of the ecology
– Advantage go to members of the population that have competitive dominance over others
n Analogy – Limited opportunities to make
novel contributions – Increased patterns of conflict and
dominance
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
“Showering” Hypothesis What drives contributions to Wikipedia? Cooperation is not the main driver? n Hypothesis: Conflicts drives most of the contributions.
– How do we measure conflicts?
n Conflicts cause coordination costs to go up. – How to measure coordination costs?
n “negotiation is critical to helping multiple perspectives to converge on shared knowledge.” – Stahl, Group Cognition, Ch8, 2004
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13
Conflict/Coordination Effects in Wikipedia (Kittur, Suh, Pendleton, Chi, CHI2007)
CSCL 2011 Keynote
Ratio of Reverted Contributions
Monthly Ratio of Reverted Edits
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Visual Analytics over Wikipedia data Mediator Pattern -‐ Terri Schiavo [Suh, et al., VAST2007]
Mediators
Sympathetic to parents
Sympathetic to husband
Anonymous (vandals/spammers)
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
WikiDashboard.com
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Coda: A Challenge: A modified logistic model n Carrying Capacity as a function of time.
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
What Did We Learn? n The Common Thread:
– Utilization of Social Signals for Learning and Information Access – Whether it is invisible, visible, and abstracted.
n The Establishment of Common Ground – Implicit Coordination – Explicit Coordination – Negotiation
n “All collective actions are built on common ground and its accumulation.” – Clark and Brennan, 1991
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Research Vision
Augmented Social Cognition n Cognition: the ability to remember, think, and reason; the faculty of
knowing. n Social Cognition: the ability of a group to remember, think, and
reason; the construction of knowledge structures by a group. – (not quite the same as in the branch of psychology that studies the
cognitive processes involved in social interaction, though included)
n Augmented Social Cognition: Supported by systems, the enhancement of the ability of a group to remember, think, and reason; the system-‐supported construction of knowledge structures by a group.
Citation: Chi, IEEE Computer, Sept 2008
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
From Rote Learning to Interaction
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Thank you! n [email protected] n http://edchi.net
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
What I will not talk about … n Motivation
– Cultural and economic incentives – Personal and societal values – Psychology (e.g. cognitive, personality, social)
n Policy and Investment – Resources – Teacher training – Technological investment
n With the Assumption of Motivation and Resources, how to make information universally accessible and useful in a Web2.0 world?
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Lowering Participation / Interaction Costs
n Interaction costs determine number of people who participate
n Surplus of attention & motivation at small transaction costs
n Therefore… n Important to keep
interaction costs low
Cost of participation #
Peop
le w
illin
g to
pro
duce
for “
free
”
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Using Machine Learning to Detect Conflicts n Counting ‘Controversial’ labels n 5x cross-‐validation, R2 = 0.897
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Predicted controversial revisions
Actu
al c
ontr
over
sial r
evisi
ons
Collaborative Knowledge Building n “They cannot even begin to coordinate on content
without assuming a vast amount of shared information or common ground…. And to coordinate on process, they need to update their common ground moment by moment. All collective actions are built on common ground and its accumulation.” – Clark and Brennan, 1991
n At Web-‐scale social learning, what we know about the nature of conflict and negotiation is woefully inadequate.
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote
Google Plus as a Research Platform
2008-05-13 CSCL 2011 Keynote