current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000...

25
Dr. Bob Traa President a.i. Centrale Bank van Curaçao en Sint Maarten August 21, 2019 Current macroeconomic challenges 1

Upload: others

Post on 20-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Dr. Bob TraaPresident a.i.Centrale Bank van Curaçao enSint Maarten

August 21, 2019

Current macroeconomic challenges

1

Page 2: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Contents

Diagnosis: What is happening?

Policy options: Can we do something about it?

2

Page 3: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Productivity trend is negative

Why is this happening and what does this mean?

• Growth in output per worker is negative on trend for Curaçao.

• The aspirational number is +1½ percent a year.• The population of working age persons is shrinking

(cyclical but watch aging).• Fewer potential workers combined with slowing productivity

means that potential output growth is negative.• Income and wages are determined by productivity—

negative productivity growth means that income and wages will decline. 3

Page 4: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Productivity trend is negative

4

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

110,000

120,000

130,000

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Labor Productivity

Labor productivity (Real GDP/E) Aspirational number

Page 5: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Working-age population is shrinking

5

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Working-age population (% change)

Page 6: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Negative potential growth

6

Page 7: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Productivity trend is negative

• When productivity declines, firms reduce employment to lower costs—unless wages can be adjusted downward. This is the force behind increasing unemployment.

• Negative productivity growth means that the economy is becoming less efficient—the supply side is shrinking.

• Is negative productivity growth the result of a shrinking capital stock (too much unused capital e.g., houses and hotels)?

• Sectoral shifts indicate structural change—this can explain lower productivity during the transition. Light at the end of the tunnel…(more on this later).

7

Page 8: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Labor is unemployed

8

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Unemployment rate (%)

Page 9: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Capital stock is unemployed

9

Page 10: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Capital stock is unemployed

10

Page 11: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Liquidity is unemployed

11

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

(NAf

. mill

ion)

Free reserves Estimate reserves for transaction and precautionary purposes

Page 12: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Sectoral shift

12

8.1

-14.9-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

Restaurants & Hotels Manufacturing

Real growth (%) in 2018

Page 13: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Competitiveness is not OK

• The real effective exchange rate (REER) indicates relative price competitiveness.

• Flat REER does not mean that competitiveness is OK! • The islands are small open economies on a fixed

exchange rate—they are price takers and cannot influence prices. The REER is going to be flat (by force).

• What matters is not just prices, but costs and efficiency—productivity (!)

• Are profit margins adequate, falling, or rising?• Is FDI coming in?• Is employment expanding?• Is the current account of the BOP in good shape? 13

Page 14: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Real exchange rate

14

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Real Effective exchange rate (excl Venezuela) RER, bilateral with US

Page 15: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

High current account deficit

15

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Curaçao: current account balance as % GDP

Page 16: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Policy: Manage aggregate demand and aggregate supply

• Aggregate demand tools: (1) fiscal and (2) monetary policy.• Should we stimulate demand?• Is domestic absorption of output bigger than domestic supply

of output? Look at the BOP and NIR.• Can fiscal policy stimulate demand? Is there financing

space? Is the debt under control? Is the structure of taxes and budget expenditures supportive of economic activity or inefficient and highly distorting (in revenue: tax consumption, not production and income; in expenditure: maintain education and public investment spending, be careful with subsidies)? 16

Page 17: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

• Aanwijzing: If we try to adjust fiscal policy too quickly, then GDP could shrink faster (“stall the engine”) and the debt ratio may even go up. Fiscal adjustment has a speed limit that can be calculated.

• Don’t adjust faster than 2 percent of GDP a year, unless the financing constraint forces your hand (Greece).

• Discuss with the Netherlands. • Groeiakkoord: Good to upgrade public administration and

civil service efficiency. Ministry of Finance needs better and more recent data.

17

Fiscal adjustment has a (symmetric) speed limit

Page 18: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Pace of fiscal adjustment

18

-3.0%

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019*

Change in primary balance

Fiscal adjustment Treshold

2019* = projection of the CBCS

Page 19: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

• What is the BOP position? NIR?• On a peg, what leeway is there for monetary policy? • Is the banking system competitive and efficient? • Is credit growing or falling?• The economic dynamics of Sint Maarten versus Curaçao

complicates monetary policy:• Sint Maarten’s recession is V-shaped. • Curaçao’s recession is L-shaped.

• This has implications for economic policy and the speed of adjustment in both countries.

19

Can monetary policy stimulate demand?(Can we print money?)

Page 20: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Monthly import coverage

20

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mon

ths

Import coverage norm Import coverage

Page 21: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Private credit extension(year-on-year growth)

21

-2.0%

-1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

Page 22: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

• How do we boost aggregate supply and potential growth?

• How do we make the economy more efficient and productive?

• This requires structural reforms: in labor markets and product markets, and government.

• Never do only labor or only product market reforms, because this disturbs the market equilibrium (use balance).

22

The role of structural policies

Page 23: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

• In an economy in structural flux, reforms are necessary to re-allocate resources. More flexibility means quicker progress and less macroeconomic pain. More rigidity means lower growth, higher unemployment, lower investment, and a longer time to reset the economy.

• Protect people, do not protect jobs (entitled positions)—that is the essence of flexicurity.

• Polder model (a tripartite solution).

23

The policy approach

Page 24: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

• Curaçao and Sint Maarten need better data:• More data• High-quality data

• The Prime Ministers are special pilots.

24

Solutions require data

Page 25: Current macroeconomic challenges...2019/08/21  · Productivity trend is negative 4 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

THEEND 25