current protocols in toxicology ii

Upload: nicolasacbrasil

Post on 14-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    1/14

    UNIT 16.4Histopathology of the Male ReproductiveSystem II: Interpretation

    Toxicants can affect the male reproductive

    system at a broad range of target sites including

    the testis, epididymis, secondary sex organs,

    and the neuroendocrine/CNS regulatory sys-

    tem. No single endpoint can adequately reflect

    changes at such a diversity of sites, but it hasbeen repeatedly demonstrated that his-

    topathologic evaluation represents the most

    sensitive and reliable indicator of toxicologic

    disturbance in the tract as a whole (Linder et

    al., 1992; Ulbrich and Palmer, 1995). This is

    only true if the appropriate tissues have been

    taken and have been fixed and sampled in such

    a way that subtle or localized changes are ade-

    quately preserved and presented to the patholo-

    gist for examination. These preparative proce-

    dures are dealt with in UNIT 16.3. Even if material

    has been appropriately fixed and sampled, it is

    incumbent on the pathologist to have an ade-

    quate understanding of the organization and

    dynamics of spermatogenesis in the species

    under investigation. Without this, lesions will

    be missed or the significance of findings will

    be misinterpreted. Although it is beyond the

    scope of this unit to provide this knowledge, an

    attempt is made to illustrate why and when such

    knowledge is essential.

    Once identified, interpretation of the signifi-

    cance of the findings to overall reproductive

    function and their implications for functional

    or morphological changes in the rest of thereproductive tract relies on a basic knowledge

    of reproductive physiology. Some examples of

    common chemically induced findings in the

    reproductive tract, their possible etiology, and

    their likely functional significance are pro-

    vided. The pattern of morphological change as

    well as the specificity and severity of the find-

    ings are significantly influenced by the duration

    of dosing, such that the approach to examina-

    tion is different in a short-term versus a long-

    term study. This unit includes a section provid-

    ing practical guidance on how to evaluate tes-

    ticular and epididymal sections for evidence ofa chemically induced effect, including what to

    look for and how hard to look for it. This

    involves using knowledge of staging to identify

    when cells are missing or when cells are inap-

    propriately present.

    Terminology of findings and how to grade

    severity is a unique problem in the testis;

    whether to grade on the basis of number of germ

    cells affected, number of tubules affected, or

    both; whether to use broad terminology such as

    tubular atrophy and tubular degeneration, or to

    use specific terminology that differentiates be-

    tween effects on specific types of germ cells

    and their stage localization. The decision isstrongly influenced by the type of study and the

    specificity of the present findings.

    As with the toxicological evaluation of any

    tissue, the species, age, and history of sponta-

    neous pathology need to be taken into account.

    These factors are particularly important with

    respect to the testis because, in some species,

    such as dog, the relatively high incidence of

    spontaneous degenerative lesions, confounded

    by the small group size of animals used can

    provide difficult data for interpretation. In ad-

    dition, the use of immature or borderline mature

    animals, which is the case for some regulatory

    studies, can mask or be mistaken for toxicologi-

    cally induced lesions. It is important that these

    limitations are realized. Most of the discussion

    in this unit relates to the rat because this is the

    most commonly used species in toxicological

    research. It is also the species for which most

    information is available. Other species are spe-

    cifically mentioned where appropriate.

    ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE FOREVALUATION AND

    INTERPRETATION OFTESTICULAR PATHOLOGY

    Spermatogenesis and theSpermatogenic Cycle

    The process and regulation of spermato-

    genesis is essentially similar in all mammalian

    species. Stem cell spermatogonia proliferate by

    mitosis and produce a population of differenti-

    ating or committed spermatogonia. These in

    turn divide and produce spermatocytes, which

    undergo DNA replication and divide by meiosis

    to produce haploid spermatids. A complex se-

    ries of morphological transformations of thesimple round spermatid finally produces a dif-

    ferentiated sperm, which is released into the

    tubule lumen and transported on into the

    epididymis. In the rat, the whole process takes

    56 days with spermatogonial divisions taking

    2 weeks, spermatocyte meiosis lasting >3

    weeks, and spermatid development also requir-

    ing 3 weeks. The arrangement of the different

    Supplement 13

    Contributed by Dianne M. CreasyCurrent Protocols in Toxicology (2002) 16.4.1-16.4.14

    Copyright 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    16.4.1

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    2/14

    populations of germ cells within the seminifer-

    ous tubule is also similar between species, with

    Sertoli cells providing a supporting structural

    framework for discrete layers of the different

    germ cell types. Spermatogonia are always at

    the base of the tubule and progressively more

    mature germ cells are found in layers moving

    toward the lumen. In all species, 3 or 4 genera-

    tions of germ cells are developing within a

    tubule at any given time. The development ofeach of these generations occurs in synchrony

    with each other, giving rise to specific and

    predictable cellular associations (Fig. 16.4.1).

    The complete sequence of cellular associations

    is referred to as the cycle of spermatogenesis

    while the individual cell associations form the

    stages of the cycle. Each stage is therefore

    defined by its germ cell complement and con-

    sequently, identifying the stage defines what

    cells should be in that tubule (and what cells

    are missing). In order for a pathologist to detect

    subtle changes in germ cell loss or, in the case

    of spermatid retention, the inappropriate pres-ence of a population of germ cells, a thorough

    understanding of the cellular makeup of the

    spermatogenic cycle is essential.

    Species-Specific Variations in theOrganization of Spermatogenesis

    Although the fundamentals of the sperma-

    togenic cycle are similar between species, there

    are certain details that vary. These can have a

    significant impact on histopathologic evalu-

    ation.

    Number of stagesThe number of stages and their cellular

    makeup varies between species and depends on

    the morphological criteria used by the classifi-

    cation system. It is important that the patholo-

    gist is familiar with the germ cell development

    and the stage map of the species under investi-

    gation. A highly recommended text that ex-

    plains in detail how to stage tubules in a number

    of common species and provides stage maps

    for each species is provided by Russell et al.

    (1990).

    Duration

    The duration of spermatogenesis (the time

    taken for a spermatogonium to develop into

    sperm) and the duration of the spermatogenic

    cycle (the time taken to complete a cycle of cell

    associations) varies between species. This in-

    formation is important so that the pathologist

    can predict how long it should take for any

    particular cell to reach a later cell type (e.g., if

    a toxicant affects leptotene spermatocytes, how

    long will it take before the animal becomes

    infertile?). Alternatively, if a particular cell type

    is missing at some defined period after dosing,

    knowing the dynamics of the spermatogenic

    cycle will allow extrapolation as to what stage

    of development that cell was in when dosing

    began. Software programs have also been de-

    veloped to calculate this type of information

    (Hess and Chen, 1992).

    Cell associations

    The organization of cell associations

    along the length of the tubule is linear for

    most mammalian species, including most

    species of monkey used in toxicological stud-

    ies. This means that a tubular cross section

    normally contains only one cell association

    and that the adjoining length of tubule (which

    is often the adjacent tubule in a cross section

    of testis) will generally contain the consecu-

    tive stage. This is not the case in humans

    where cell associations are arranged in a heli-cal pattern resulting in a mosaic of cell asso-

    ciations in a single cross section. In dogs,

    although only one stage is present in a cross

    section, adjoining lengths of tubule do not

    necessarily contain consecutive stages.

    Disturbances in SpermatogenesisAlmost regardless of the cellular target of

    toxicity within the reproductive system, the

    most common morphological consequence of

    injury is a disturbance in spermatogenesis. This

    is because spermatogenesis is dependent on, or

    sensitive to, functional perturbations in mostother parts of the reproductive tract. Spermato-

    genic disruption may reflect a direct effect on

    the seminiferous epithelium, affecting either

    the Sertoli cell or any one of the germ cell

    populations, or it may occur as a secondary

    response to altered hormone levels, altered vas-

    cular supply or altered fluid balance, either

    within the testis or within the epididymis. It is

    therefore extremely important that distur-

    bances in spermatogenesis are detected. The

    pattern of disturbance can be very specific and

    diagnostic of the mechanism of toxicity, but

    generally, this is only seen during the early

    development of the lesion. With longer periods

    of dosing, the development of maturation de-

    pletion (whereby death of a specific precursor

    germ cell causes the progressive loss of its

    descendant generations), reduces the specific-

    ity of the pattern of spermatogenic disturbance

    as the tubules become depleted of more and

    more germ cells.

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.2

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    3/14

    1

    15

    15 19 15

    1

    EP

    In

    EP

    In

    8

    19

    MP

    PL

    14

    D

    Z

    A

    11

    LP

    LA

    A

    Z

    D8

    1

    1411

    LP

    EP

    In

    I VIII XI

    XI XIV

    I VIII

    XIV I

    PL

    MPL

    A

    Figure 16.4.1 Stages of the spermatogenic cycle of the rat. Cell associations for 4 of the 14 stages

    of the spermatogenic cycle of the rat (stages I, VIII, XI, XIV). Spermatogonia: A, type A; In,

    intermediate;Spermatocytes: PL, preleptotene; L, leptotene; Z, zygotene; EP, early pachytene; MP,

    mid pachytene; LP, late pachytene; D, dividing. Spermatids:1, 8, 11, 14, 15, and 19 indicates steps

    1 to 19 of spermatid development. The tubular cross sections (stages I, VIII, XI, and XIV) show the

    arrangement of cells within the seminiferous epithelium. The columns of cells at the base of the

    figure show the maturation of the cells during one spermatogenic cycle. Each generation of cells

    develops sequentially. During stage VIII, the mature step 19 spermatids are shed into the lumen(arrows) while a new generation develops from stem cell spermatogonia. As spermatocytes

    undergo meiotic division (D) in stage XIV, they produce step 1 spermatids and the cell association

    returns to stage I to begin another cycle. (Reproduced from Creasy, 1997, with permission.)

    Current Protocols in Toxicology Supplement 13

    16.4.3

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    4/14

    Regulatory Guidelines and the Role ofStaging in HistopathologicExamination of the Testis

    Recently revised regulatory guidelines have

    placed increased emphasis on the importance

    of histopathology for detecting toxicological

    effects in the male reproductive system. Rec-ommendations have been made, not only for

    fixation and staining procedures but also for the

    microscopic examination of tissues, providing

    examples of findings that should be recorded

    (Table 16.4.1). During the drafting of these

    guidelines, there was much discussion relating

    to the subject of staging of testes, and al-

    though there is no mention of staging in the

    final issued guidelines, the issue has become

    surrounded by confusion. The ability to recog-

    nize stages of the spermatogenic cycle is im-

    portant in order for the pathologist to recognize

    when cells are missing or are inappropriately

    present. Due to the lack of understanding of this

    concept, there has been a move to expect the

    pathologist to produce a quantitative assess-

    ment of stagese.g., a frequency distribution

    of tubules for individual stages of the sperma-

    togenic cycle. While this may be useful infor-

    mation in an investigative study to determine

    whether the dynamics of the spermatogenic

    cycle have been disturbed (Hess, 1990), it is

    inappropriate to carry out in a regulatory study,

    which is designed as a screening study to detect

    effects on spermatogenesis. Knowledge ofstaging should be used in a qualitative way to

    evaluate the normality of the cellular makeup

    of the seminiferous tubules. In other words, the

    testis should be examined with an under-

    standing of the normal progression of the stages

    of the spermatogenic cycle. This approach is

    explained below. For a more detailed discus-

    sion of this issue see Creasy (1997) and Chapin

    and Conner (1999).

    COMMON TOXICOLOGICALLYINDUCED FINDINGS AND THEIRPOSSIBLE SIGNIFICANCE

    As with any tissue, the cellular response to

    injury is limited and at times, nonspecific.

    However, certain aspects of the early patho-

    genesis of toxicologically induced lesions inthe testis and accessory tissues can provide

    important information on the mechanism of

    injury. Additional information can be found in

    Nolte et al. (1995), Creasy (2001), and Creasy

    and Foster (2001).

    Testes

    Germ cell degeneration/multinucleate

    aggregates

    Whether spontaneous or induced, death of

    germ cells appears to occur predominantly

    through apoptosis, a process that is closely

    regulated by the Sertoli cell (Lee et al., 1997,

    1999). This is particularly true for spermatogo-

    nia, which may be seen apoptosing in occa-

    sional stage XII tubules. However, many of the

    dying cells do not have the classic morphologi-

    cal appearance of apoptotic cells. Dying sper-

    matocytes generally develop cytoplasmic eos-

    inophilia and nuclear pyknosis while round

    spermatids show chromatin margination. If cell

    death progresses rapidly, then the apoptotic cell

    is rapidly phagocytized by the surrounding Ser-

    toli cell cytoplasm and all evidence of cell deathis rapidly removed. Cell death and phagocy-

    tosis of the remains can be complete within 24

    hr, so if the process is not examined during this

    time span, the only evidence of cell death will

    be an absence of the cell (cell depletion). If the

    degenerative process is slow, then adjacent

    germ cells belonging to the same cohort, may

    form a multinucleate syncitium (symplast,

    multinucleate giant cells) probably due to the

    Table 16.4.1 Specific EPA and OECD Recommendations for Histopathological Examination of the Testesand Epididymides in Studies to Detect Effects on Reproduction and Fertility

    Testis Epididymis

    Detailed histopathological examination of testes

    should be conducted in order to identify

    treatment-related effects such as:

    Examination of the intact epididymis should include

    the caput, corpus, and cauda. The epididymis should

    be evaluated for:

    Retained spermatids Leukocyte infiltration

    Missing germ cell layers or types Sperm granulomas

    Multinucleate giant cells Change in prevalence of cell types

    Sloughing of spermatogenic cells into the lumen Absence of clear cells in the cauda epithelium

    Aberrent cell types in the lumen

    Phagocytosis of sperm

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.4

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    5/14

    breakdown of the cytoskeletal fibers supporting

    the interconnecting cytoplasmic bridges. Mult-

    inucleate aggregates are less readily phago-

    cytized by Sertoli cells and are present for

    longer periods and therefore more frequently

    seen. They are most often composed of round

    spermatids, but can also be formed by fusion

    of neighboring spermatocytes or elongating

    spermatids.

    Germ cell depletion

    This is the most common sequel to sperma-togenic disturbance and is generally a conse-

    quence of germ cell death rather than exfolia-

    tion. It may be seen as a generalized or partial

    depletion of the germ cells or it may only affect

    a specific cell type (e.g., spermatogonia).

    Sometimes a specific cell type within specific

    stages may be affected (e.g., pachytene sper-

    matocytes in stages XII and XIII). Once the cell

    has been phagocytized, the only way of recog-

    nizing the lesion is by the abnormal cellular

    association of individual stages of the sperma-

    togenic cycle and the progressive development

    of maturation depletion with time (Fig. 16.4.2).

    The appearance of the testis, in terms of what

    cells are missing, will depend largely on how

    severe the initial effect was and how long after

    dosing the testis is examined.

    Instead of a specific cell type being killed,

    a focal cohort of cells within a tubule may be

    affected and result in a focal blow out of the

    epithelium. This may be due to an effect on afew adjacent spermatogonia, which then fail to

    produce their cohort of spermatocytes and sper-

    matids, or on one or two Sertoli cells, which

    are then unable to support spermatogenesis.

    Partial or generalized germ cell depletion

    may affect only a small number of tubular

    profiles or a large proportion of the tubules.

    When only a few scattered tubules are affected,

    it is not possible to determine whether they

    day of dosing

    ES

    Sg

    ES

    Sg

    RSES

    Sg

    Sg

    RSPS

    1 week

    2 weeks 4 weeks

    Figure 16.4.2 Development of maturation depletion following daily dosing with a spermatocytetoxicant. Time-dependent progression of maturation depletion following cell-specific damage to

    pachytene spermatocytes (PS). If the tubule is examined on the day of dosing, spermatocyte

    degeneration and necrosis will be seen (top left). Phagocytosis of the necrotic cells by Sertoli cells

    results in their rapid disappearance and because dosing continues, newly formed pachytene

    spermatocytes will also be killed. Examination of the same stage tubule after 1 week of dosing (top

    right) will reveal an absence of pachytene spermatocytes. After 2 weeks of dosing (one spermato-

    genic cycle duration) pachytene spermatocytes will still be missing but round spermatids will also

    be absent because their precursor cells were destroyed in the previous cycle (bottom left). Similarly,

    after 4 weeks of dosing (bottom right), pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongated

    spermatids will be absent, leaving only spermatogonia. This progressive loss of subsequent germ

    cells following injury to a previous cell type is termed maturation depletion. ES, elongated sperma-

    tids; RS, round spermatids; PS, pachytene spermatocytes; Sg, spermatogonia. (Reproduced from

    Creasy, 1997, with permission.)

    Current Protocols in Toxicology Supplement 13

    16.4.5

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    6/14

    represent multiple convolutions of the same

    tubule or focal segments of multiple affected

    tubules. Prolonged dosing with a number of

    testicular toxicants may cause generalized

    germ cell depletion, affecting a large proportion

    of the tubules. It generally represents an ad-

    vanced or end-stage lesion, and in order to

    elucidate the primary target cell, a time course

    study needs to be carried out.

    It is not possible to say whether spermato-genic depletion is or is not reversible without

    carrying out an appropriate study. If spermato-

    gonia are still present, then the lesion is poten-

    tially reversible but if the Sertoli cells are func-

    tionally compromised, spermatogenesis may

    not be supportable. The chronic effects of 2,5-

    hexanedione on the rat testis exemplify this.

    Although spermatogonia remain and are seen

    to divide, spermatogenesis does not recover.

    This is thought to be due to the inhibition of a

    critical Sertoli cell factor (Blanchard et al.,

    1998). Conversely, spermatogonia may be sig-

    nificantly depleted, but if the Sertoli cells arefunctionally intact and sufficient time is al-

    lowed for stem cell renewal and repopulation

    (and this may require several spermatogenic

    periods), substantial recovery may be seen

    (Meistrich, 1986).

    Germ cell exfoliation

    Loss of adhesion between Sertoli cell and

    germ cell, or shearing of Sertoli cell cytoplasm

    (as seen with cytoskeletal disrupting agents)

    will result in exfoliation of germ cells into the

    lumen of the seminiferous tubule and sub-

    sequent transport of the cells to the rete testisand the epididymis. The exfoliated cells may

    appear morphologically normal but are rapidly

    removed from the testis. Once the cells have

    been removed, cell depletion is the only recog-

    nizable finding. Lumenal germ cells may also

    be present as a result of handling trauma at

    necropsy. Care must be taken to distinguish

    between real and artifactual exfoliation (Foley,

    2001). Abnormal residual bodies shed into the

    lumen can sometimes be mistaken for exfoli-

    ated germ cells. These generally occur as a

    result of disturbances in spermiation (see be-

    low).

    Tubular vacuolation

    Vacuolation within or between Sertoli cells

    is a common early sign of Sertoli cell damage.

    The vacuoles may be solitary and situated

    amongst the germ cells at varying depths

    throughout the epithelium. It is generally not

    possible by light microscopy to determine

    whether they are intra- or extra-cellular. In other

    cases, intracellular microvacuolation or swel-

    ling may be seen affecting the basal area of the

    Sertoli cell cytoplasm and causing germ cell

    displacement and disorganization. Such find-

    ings are suggestive of disturbances within the

    Sertoli cell and may represent alterations in the

    smooth endoplasmic reticulum or in fluid ho-

    meostasis. Vacuolation may also be seen in

    end-stage lesions, associated with extensivegerm cell loss. In this situation, it should not be

    regarded as a primary effect on the Sertoli cell.

    Occasional solitary vacuoles are sometimes

    seen in tubules from normal testes but these are

    generally few in number. Vacuoles in the basal

    compartment of the tubule, surrounding sper-

    matogonia are generally fixation-induced arti-

    facts due to osmotic shrinkage.

    Tubular contraction

    Reduction in the overall diameter of the

    seminiferous tubule will occur as a result of

    germ cell depletion and/or as a result of reducedsecretion of seminiferous tubule fluid. Seminif-

    erous tubule fluid is secreted by the Sertoli cell

    and maintains the lumenal size, which varies

    with the stage of spermatogenesis. This is an

    androgen-dependent function of the Sertoli cell

    and will be affected by altered testosterone

    secretion. Another major regulatory factor for

    fluid secretion is the presence of elongating and

    elongated spermatids. Therefore, if these cells

    are depleted, fluid production and conse-

    quently lumenal size are decreased. Germ cell

    loss and decreased fluid will have a significant

    effect on testis weight.

    Tubular dilatation

    Dilatation of the tubular lumen will occur as

    a result of increased lumenal fluid volume. This

    can occur through increased secretion by the

    Sertoli cell or decreased expulsion of fluid from

    the tubule, which is thought to be a function of

    the contractile peritubular cells. Also decreased

    resorption of fluid by the epithelial cells of the

    rete and efferent ducts or obstruction of the

    outflow (e.g., a sperm granuloma) can cause

    increased tubular fluid. The increased fluid vol-

    ume will generally be reflected by an increased

    weight of the testis unless there is an accompa-

    nying significant cell loss. The pathological

    consequences of the finding depend on the

    severity and duration of the effect. Prolonged

    increased pressure on the seminiferous epithe-

    lium will generally result in pressure atrophy

    of varying degrees and may also lead to inspis-

    sated sperm and granulomatous inflammation.

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.6

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    7/14

    Spermatid retention

    This is a subtle but relatively common find-

    ing that may be caused by a number of chemi-

    cals as well as by hormonal disturbance. It is

    characterized by the retention of step 19 sper-

    matids (which should be released during stage

    VIII) through stages VIII to XII. The position

    of the retained spermatids varies with different

    chemicals. In some cases, e.g., boric acid

    (Chapin and Ku, 1994), the retained spermatidsremain in a predominantly lumenal position

    through stages VIII to XI and are then pulled

    down into the basal cytoplasm of stage XII

    tubules where they are phagocytized. With

    other chemicals the step 19 spermatids are

    rapidly pulled down into the basal cytoplasm

    and phagocytized during stages VIII to XI,

    leaving very few in a lumenal position. The

    formation and behavior of the residual bodies

    is often also disturbed with residual bodies of

    abnormal shape and size being seen in the

    tubular or epididymal lumen. Descent and

    phagocytosis of residual bodies normally occursduring stages IX to XI but in cases of spermatid

    retention this may be delayed into stage XII. The

    pathological significance of spermatid retention

    can be varied. It is often associated with abnor-

    mal sperm parameters (number, motility, or

    morphology) and it may be associated with

    alterations in fertility parameters. If homogeni-

    zation resistant spermatids are measured, the

    retained spermatids should be reflected by an

    increase in this parameter. However, identifica-

    tion by histopathology is a much more sensitive

    endpoint since it can detect very small numbers

    of phagocytized spermatids.

    Tubular necrosis

    While germ-cell necrosis proceeds by apop-

    tosis, tubular necrosis is characterized by co-

    agulative (oncotic) necrosis of Sertoli and germ

    cells. Sertoli cells are normally highly resistant

    to cell death even though they may be very

    sensitive to functional perturbations. Conse-

    quently, they are often the only cell left lining

    severely damaged tubules (Sertoli cellonly

    tubules). Ischemia is one of the few situations

    where they are killed. The effects of this can beseen with cadmium toxicity, which damages

    the testicular capillary endothelium. It can also

    be seen following administration of vasoactive

    compounds such as serotonin. Necrosis and

    loss of the Sertoli cells from tubules is the major

    characteristic of the lesion, and this is associ-

    ated with gross disorganization and necrosis of

    the germ cells as well as stasis of sperm in the

    tubular lumen. Due to the loss of the Sertoli cell

    blood-tubule barrier, the changes are also ac-

    companied by an inflammatory infiltrate,

    which is an otherwise rare accompaniment to

    toxic injury. Tubular necrosis is a serious irre-

    versible lesion because Sertoli cells are unable

    to proliferate and the affected tubules are likely

    to involute and be replaced by scar tissue.

    Dilated rete

    Both ends of the seminiferous tubules emptyinto the rete. Most of the tubule fluid is reab-

    sorbed in the epithelium of the rete and efferent

    ducts. If there is an obstruction in the efferent

    ducts or in the epididymis, the fluid back-pres-

    sure will cause the rete to dilate and if the

    obstruction is severe, the back pressure will

    progressively dilate the seminiferous tubules.

    The tubules in the area of the rete also appear

    to be a preferential location for some testicular

    toxicants, but this should not be confused with

    the transitional tubuli rectii that join the

    seminiferous tubules to the rete and can be

    mistaken for depleted tubules.

    Leydig cell atrophy/hypertrophy/

    hyperplasia/adenoma

    Testosterone secretion is the major function

    of the Leydig cell and the abundance of smooth

    endoplasmic reticulum in the cell reflects this

    activity. Increased stimulation by luteinizing

    hormone results in functional hypertrophy and

    hyperplasia. With prolonged gonadotropin

    stimulation in the rat, Leydig cell hyperplasia

    will usually progress to adenoma formation.

    Many classes of compounds with diverse

    chemical structures have been shown to pro-duce this effect in the rat but the significance to

    man is considered limited (Clegg et al., 1997).

    Decreased secretion of testosterone, whether

    through inhibition of biosynthesis or decreased

    gonadotropin stimulation, will lead to atrophic

    changes in the Leydig cell.

    Recognition of atrophy, hypertrophy, and

    hyperplasia on a qualitative basis is not easy

    unless the changes are marked. Contraction of

    tubules due to cell loss will result in an apparent

    increase in the volume of the interstitial space.

    This may or may not be contributed to by a real

    increase in size and number of Leydig cells, but

    quantitative analysis may be necessary to sepa-

    rate real from apparent effects.

    Epididymis

    Lumenal germ cells/debris

    Cells and residual bodies exfoliated from the

    testis will be transported into the epididymis.

    Current Protocols in Toxicology Supplement 13

    16.4.7

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    8/14

    This can serve as useful confirmatory evidence

    for changes seen in the testis. It can also alert

    the pathologist to changes that may have been

    overlooked in the testis. Occasional exfoliated

    germ cells are sometimes seen in normal ani-

    mals, and in immature and peripubertal animals

    this number is significantly increased. Abnor-

    mal residual bodies may also be detected in the

    epididymis as a consequence of disturbed sper-

    miation in the testis. The presence or absenceof germ cells in the luminal contents can also

    aid the pathologist in evaluating whether appar-

    ently exfoliated germ cells in the lumina of

    seminiferous tubules are real effects or artifacts

    of trimming; such artifacts will not be present

    in epididymal lumena.

    Epithelial vacuolation

    Microvacuolation of the epididymal epithe-

    lium can be seen as a specific chemically in-

    duced finding. Macrovacuolation and cribri-

    form change (infolding of the epithelium

    within itself) is often seen accompanying con-traction of the atrophic aspermic epididymis.

    This may represent a normal mechanism of

    surface area reduction but has also been re-

    ported as a toxicologic change (Foley, 2001).

    Epithelial vacuoles are also sometimes seen as

    a normal finding in some species at the junction

    of the corpus and cauda. Since fluid absorption

    and secretion are both major functions of the

    epididymal epithelium, vacuolation is a likely

    sequel to disturbance of either function.

    Epithelial inflammation and sperm

    granulomaThe antigenically foreign sperm in the

    epididymal lumen and in the seminiferous tu-

    bule are in an immunologically protected envi-

    ronment. The protection is afforded by the

    lumenal tight junctions between epithelial cells

    in the excurrent ducts and by the basal occlusive

    junctions between Sertoli cells in the testis. If

    these barriers are damaged, then an inflamma-

    tory response against the sperm develops and

    generally progresses to form a sperm granu-

    loma. This is a chronic, progressive lesion and

    in the coiled epididymal duct has the added

    complication of causing obstruction to the pas-

    sage of sperm. Furthermore, the oxidative free

    radicals produced by inflammatory cells in con-

    tact with sperm can lead to genotoxic damage,

    which may have implications for male-medi-

    ated congenital defects and post-implantation

    losses (Chellman et al., 1986). The efferent

    ducts, which join the caput epididymis with the

    rete testis, are a particular site for damage.

    Certain chemicals, e.g., carbamates, cause

    sperm stasis and inflammation of these ducts

    resulting in partial or complete obstruction to

    sperm transit and secondary dilatation of

    seminiferous tubules. The mechanism may be

    through increased fluid absorption resulting in

    sperm stasis and inflammation (Hess, 1998).

    The efferent ducts are also a frequent site for

    the occurrence of spontaneous sperm granu-

    lomas. In species such as the dog, they oftenform blind ending tubules that contain inspis-

    sated sperm, which can develop inflammation

    and progress to sperm granulomas.

    Ductular dilatation/interstitial edema

    This can occur as a result of fluid imbalance

    mediated through the vasculature or inhibited

    fluid reabsorption by the epithelial cells. In-

    flammatory infiltrate and sperm granulomas

    are a frequent consequence.

    Prostate/Seminal Vesicles

    Acinar atrophy

    Secretory activity by the prostate and semi-

    nal vesicles is a sensitive, androgen-dependent

    function. Decreased circulating testosterone

    levels, or interference with androgen receptors

    in these two tissues will result in reduced se-

    cretion leading to atrophic changes. These may

    be detected by organ weight changes as well as

    by microscopic changes

    PRACTICAL APPROACH FOREXAMINATION OF THE TESTIS

    AND EPIDIDYMIS FORTOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS

    The approach used is influenced by the du-

    ration of the study. Cell- and stage-specific

    disturbances in spermatogenesis are usually

    only seen in short duration studies of

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    9/14

    decreased sperm and fluid content. An in-

    creased weight in either tissue generally re-

    flects increased fluid content, which is either

    interstitial or tubule fluid. Increased interstitial

    fluid will be seen as edema and suggests a

    vascular-mediated lesion while increased tu-

    bule fluid will be reflected by dilated tubular or

    ductal lumen size. There are various possible

    reasons for this (see Common Toxicologically

    Induced Findings and Their Possible Signifi-cance).

    2. If testicular homogenization-resistant

    spermatids (HRS) and/or epididymal sperm

    have been counted, review these data. A de-

    crease in HRS indicates a reduced number of

    elongated spermatids. This could be due to a

    direct effect on these cells or due to maturation

    depletion following effects on an earlier cell

    type (the answer should be apparent by his-

    topathology). HRS data are particularly useful

    for confirming or alerting the pathologist to

    slight reductions in sperm production which

    may not be immediately obvious by qualitativehistopathology. A reduction in HRS should be

    reflected by a decrease in epididymal sperm

    count, but only if sufficient time has elapsed

    between release of the reduced numbers of

    sperm from the testis and their arrival in the

    cauda epididymis or vas (2 weeks). If caudal

    sperm are decreased in the absence of any effect

    on HRS, a direct effect on epididymal sperm or

    on sperm transit time is likely. An increase in

    HRS numbers suggests retention of elongated

    spermatids in the testis and should be confir-

    mable by pathology.

    3. Examine the testis at low power. Lookfor obvious depletion or disorganization of

    germ cells within the epithelium or exfoliation

    of germ cells into the lumen. Look for occa-

    sional atrophic tubules (shrunken tubules lined

    only by Sertoli cells) and determine whether

    the number is increased over control levels.

    Look for an increase in the number of vacuoles

    within the tubular epithelium. Look for tubular

    dilatation or tubular contraction.

    4. At higher power, randomly scan tubules

    and check that the appropriate cell layers are

    present in their approximately normal num-

    bersi.e., that stages I to VIII contain a layer

    of spermatogonia, a layer of pachytene sperma-

    tocytes, and several layers of round spermatids

    interspersed with elongated spermatids. Stages

    IX to XIV should contain a layer of pre-

    pachytene spermatocytes, several layers of late

    pachytene or dividing (stage XIV) spermato-

    cytes, and several layers of elongating sperma-

    tids. This does not require individual identifi-

    cation of stages, just a familiarization with the

    cellular make up of the two halves of the sper-

    matogenic cycle. It will allow for the identifi-

    cation of when a cell population is missing. This

    is particularly important in studies of28-days

    duration, where maturation depletion may not

    have progressed to produce an obvious lesion.

    If, for example, in a 28-day study in the rat,

    spermatogonia are killed, the most obvious

    finding in the terminal kill animals will be aloss of prepachytene spermatocytes in stages

    IX to XIV. Otherwise the testes may appear

    superficially normal. Check Leydig cells for

    relative number and evidence of hypertrophy,

    atrophy, or vacuolation. However, bear in mind

    that the morphological appearance of the Ley-

    dig cell is not a very sensitive indicator of

    function.

    5. Identify a few tubules between stages IX

    to XI (there will be relatively few) and examine

    these at high power for evidence of sperm

    retention. There should be only one population

    of elongating spermatids at the lumen. Alsoexamine a few stage XII tubules for evidence

    of sperm head phagocytosis in the basal Sertoli

    cell cytoplasm. These may occasionally be seen

    in normal stage XII tubules but rarely exceed

    more than 2 to 3 per tubule cross section.

    Check a few stage VII tubules to ensure ap-

    proximately normal numbers of step 19 (ma-

    ture) sperm at the lumen and a normal appear-

    ing layer of residual bodies at the lumen. Also

    check stage VII tubules for any evidence of

    degenerate pachytene spermatocytes and round

    spermatids. Decreased testosterone levels will

    lead to an increased rate of degeneration inthese cells in stages VII. The number of cells

    affected at any one time can be small (2 to 3

    cells per tubule cross-section) but this stage-

    specific lesion is characteristic for and the most

    sensitive marker of decreased testosterone lev-

    els in the testis. Effects will become progres-

    sively more obvious with time, due to matura-

    tion depletion and direct effects on the elongat-

    ing spermatids.

    6. Examine the epididymis at low power for

    evidence of reduced sperm content, sperm

    granulomas, interstitial inflammation, or

    edema.

    7. At higher power, examine ductal con-

    tents for evidence of testicular germ cells or

    residual bodies (increased above control lev-

    els). Examine epididymal epithelium for pres-

    ence of vacuoles, inflammation, or altered cel-

    lular characteristics or complement compared

    with controls. If any alterations in sperm or

    cellular content of the epididymis is seen, go

    Current Protocols in Toxicology Supplement 13

    16.4.9

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    10/14

    Table 16.4.2 Rapid Reference Guide to Evaluation and Interpretation of Weight Changes and HistopathologicFindings in the Reproductive Tract

    Finding/observation What to look for Possible causes

    Increased testis weight Seminiferous tubular lumen dilatation Increased seminiferous tubule fluid that may

    be due to obstruction of outflow, decreased

    emptying of tubules, decreased resorption of

    fluid by rete/epididymis, increased production

    by Sertoli cell

    Increased interstitial fluid (interstitialedema)

    Altered hemodynamics, injury to vascularendothelium, reduced lymphatic drainage

    Decreased testis weight Germ cell depletion Disruption of spermatogenesis through effects

    on germ cells, Sertoli cells, hormonal

    disturbance, or blood supply

    Seminiferous tubule lumen contraction Decreased production of seminiferous tubule

    fluid that may result from loss of elongating

    spermatids and/or decreased testosterone

    production

    Increased epididymal weight Increased interstitial fluid Altered hemodynamics, injury to vascular

    endothelium, reduced lymphatic drainage

    Increased ductular fluid Decreased resorption of fluid by rete, efferent

    ducts, and caput epitheliumSperm granulomas May be spontaneous but may be induced by

    any agent causing inflammation or damage to

    the epididymal epithelial lining

    Decreased epididymal

    weight

    Reduced sperm content and contraction

    of ductular lumen size

    Disruption of spermatogenesis resulting in

    reduced sperm production or release from the

    testis

    Decreased weight of

    seminal vesicles and/or

    prostate

    Atrophic changes in the secretory

    epithelium and decreased secretory

    product

    Reduced levels of circulating testosterone,

    inhibition of 5- reductase, or disruption of

    androgen receptor binding

    Germ cell loss Is a specific cell type(s) affected? Does

    the germ cell loss fit into a pattern of

    maturation depletion or is it

    nonspecific? Is it focal or diffuse, is itpartial or generalized?

    The pattern of the germ cell loss will provide

    valuable clues as to the likely mechanism of

    injury, but this will also be very much

    influenced by the duration of the study (seemain text for detail). The pathogenesis of

    germ cell loss is best investigated in a short

    time-course study.

    Loss of elongate and

    elongating spermatids

    Degeneration of step 7 spermatids and

    pachytene spermatocytes in stage VII

    tubules

    Disruption of testosterone secretion, which

    may be caused by direct effects on the Leydig

    cells or endocrine mediated effects.

    Alternatively, direct effects on elongating

    spermatids

    Degeneration/apoptosis of

    germ cells

    Is a specific cell type affected? Are the

    dying cells restricted to a specific

    tubular stage? Are the affected cells

    forming multinucleate aggregates?

    The cause may be direct toxicity to the

    affected germ cell but it may also be mediated

    through a stage-specific disturbance to the

    Sertoli cell. Apoptotic cells are rapidly

    removed. Multinucleate aggregates suggest a

    slow, nonspecific degenerative process

    continued

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.10

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    11/14

    back to the testis and examine carefully, since

    this probably reflects spermatogenic distur-

    bance.

    NOMENCLATURE AND SEVERITYGRADING OF SPERMATOGENICDISTURBANCE (GERM CELLDEPLETION/GERM CELLDEGENERATION)

    The nomenclature used to describe deple-

    tion and degeneration in the seminiferous epi-

    thelium will depend on the specificity of the

    findings seen, and this is most often related to

    the duration of the study. In a 1- or 2-year

    chronic study, any disturbance in spermato-

    genesis is likely to show as generalized germ

    cell depletion from some or all of the seminif-

    erous tubules. Due to the duration of dosing and

    the effects of maturation depletion, there is

    unlikely to be any specificity in the germ cells

    lost or in the stages of tubules affected. The

    lesion seen is an end-stage lesion and therefore

    nonspecific terminology and simple severity

    grading based on proportion of tubules affected

    can be used (Table 16.4.3). Regulatory studies

    of28 days duration or investigational time-

    course studies are much more likely to demon-

    strate specific patterns of germ cell loss and

    degeneration that may be restricted to specific

    stages of the spermatogenic cycle. The termi-

    nology used will depend on the specificity ofsuch findings. Examples of general and specific

    findings are provided in Table 16.4.4.

    The employment of a severity grading sys-

    tem will also depend on the nature of the find-

    ings. A general grading system based on the

    proportion of tubules affected by a given find-

    ing can be used for most nonspecific findings

    (Table 16.4.2). Grading becomes difficult for

    cell-specific and stage-specific findings. For

    example, if 50% of the pachytene spermato-

    cytes in 100% of stage VII tubules are degen-

    erate, how should this be graded? Although

    100% of stage VII tubules are affected, this only

    constitutes 20% of the total number of tubules

    in the testis cross section, and then only a

    proportion of the spermatocytes within the tu-

    bule are affected. Such situations have to be

    dealt with on a case-by-case basis and the

    terminology for each finding has to be made

    sufficiently detailed to impart the necessary

    information.

    Germ cell exfoliation Presence of exfoliated germ cells in the

    rete and epididymal lumens

    Disruption of Sertoli/germ cell junctions

    leading to loss of adhesion; disruption of

    Sertoli cell cytoskeletal fibers leading to

    sloughing of apical Sertoli cell cytoplasm and

    attached germ cells

    Macro/micro tubularvacuolation (in the absence

    of severe germ cell

    injury/loss)

    Is this located in the basal Sertoli cellcytoplasm or scattered as large vacuoles

    throughout tubule? Look for

    accompanying or additional focal germ

    cell loss (suggesting focal Sertoli cell

    damage).

    Disturbance of Sertoli cell function leading tovacuolation of organelles or disturbance of

    fluid balance. Do not confuse with

    osmotic-induced fixation artifact.

    Necrosis and

    disorganization of tubular

    contents (including Sertoli

    cells)

    Evidence of acute inflammatory

    infiltrate around affected tubules

    Disturbance in hemodynamics or damage to

    the vascular endothelium leading to ischemic

    necrosis

    Spermatid retention Alteration in epididymal sperm

    parameters (morphology, motility, and

    count) and possible increase in HRS

    Disturbance in testosterone secretion, in

    Sertoli cell function, or in spermatid

    development leading to failure in spermiation

    Dilated seminiferous tubulelumens

    Blockage of efferent ducts orepididymal duct; evidence of

    pressure-induced germ cell loss

    Increased seminiferous tubule fluid that maybe due to obstruction of outflow, decreased

    emptying of tubules, decreased resorption of

    fluid by rete/epididymis, increased production

    of fluid by Sertoli cell

    Table 16.4.2 Rapid Reference Guide to Evaluation and Interpretation of Weight Changes and HistopathologicFindings in the Reproductive Tract, continued

    Finding/observation What to look for Possible causes

    Current Protocols in Toxicology Supplement 13

    16.4.11

    MaleReproductiveToxicology

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    12/14

    ARTIFACTS, SPONTANEOUSPATHOLOGY, AND IMMATURITY

    Preparative and Fixation ArtifactsAs with any tissue, fixation and processingartifacts as well as spontaneous pathology need

    to be distinguished from toxicologic changes.

    Bouins fixation results in appreciable tubular

    shrinkage, which is more marked in the center

    than at the periphery of the testis. The enlarged

    interstitial area surrounding these shrunken tu-

    bules can be mistaken for edema. Formalin fixa-

    tion, particularly in large animal testes can result

    in sufficiently severe cellular shrinkage that the

    cells appear pyknotic and the epithelium appears

    extensively vacuolated. Pressure from forceps

    during necropsy, or cutting into the testis beforeit is adequately fixed can result in displacement

    of germ cells into the tubular lumen that can be

    mistaken for exfoliation. For a review of some of

    the more common artifacts see Foley (2001).

    ImmaturityIn the testis, an additional factor that needs

    to be considered is the age and maturity of the

    animal. In the peripubertal animal, spermato-

    genesis is incomplete and inefficient. This is

    characterized by reduced numbers of elongat-

    ing and elongated spermatids and a signifi-

    cantly increased population of degenerating

    germ cells of all types (spermatogonia, sperma-

    tocytes, and spermatids). Significant numbers

    of exfoliated germ cells and cell debris in the

    epididymal ducts and an absence or reduction

    of sperm usually accompany this. This appear-

    ance can be indistinguishable from chemically

    induced effects on spermatogenesis. In regula-

    tory toxicity studies, this has proved a particular

    problem with respect to dogs since the regula-

    tory guidelines recommend starting studies

    with dogs of an immature age (5 to 7 months).

    In studies of 13 weeks duration, the dogs arethen on the borderline of maturity. Small group

    sizes and significant variations in the age that

    dogs attain full sexual maturity (8 to 12 months)

    can lead to difficulties in separating the appear-

    ance of varying levels of immaturity from

    chemically induced changes.

    Primates used in toxicity testing are fre-

    quently immature and the variation between

    Table 16.4.3 Semiquantitative Grading System toRecord the Severity of Germ Cell Degeneration orDepletion in Seminiferous Tubules

    Severity gradeApproximate proportion oftubules affected

    1 (minimal) 75% tubules affected

    Table 16.4.4 Examples of NonSpecific and Specific Terminology to Categorize Germ Cell Loss andDegeneration in Seminiferous Tubulesa

    Nonspecific Specific

    Tubules with generalized germ cell depletion Depletion/degeneration spermatogonia

    Tubules with partial germ cell depletion Depletion/degeneration prepachytene spermatocytes

    Tubules with focal germ cell depletion Depletion/degeneration pachytene spermatocytes

    Occasional Sertoli cellonly (atrophic) tubules Depletion/degeneration round spermatidsGerm cell degeneration/multinucleate aggregates Depletion/degeneration elongating spermatids

    Depletion/degeneration elongated spermatids

    aThe choice of whether to use nonspecific or specific terminology depends on the cell specificity of the changes seen. In longer duration

    studies, germ cell loss is often patchy and nonspecific but shorter duration studies are more likely to show a cell-specific pattern of germ

    cell loss. If necessary, the cell-specific changes can be further specified in terms of the individual spermatogenic stage or range of stages

    affected. Each of the findings can then be graded using the approximate percentage of tubules affected (see Table 16.4.3).

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.12

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    13/14

    age and maturity of individuals within a study

    can be marked. As a general guide, Cynomolo-

    gous monkeys

  • 7/29/2019 Current Protocols in Toxicology II

    14/14

    Rehm, S. 2001. Spontaneous testicular lesions inpurpose bred beagle dogs. Toxicol. Pathol.28:782-787.

    Russell, L.D., Ettlin, R.A., Sinha-Hikim, A.P., andClegg, E.D. 1990. Histological and his-topathological evaluation of the testis. pp. 62-193. Cache River Press, Clearwater, Florida.

    Ulbrich, B. and Palmer, A.K. 1995. Detection ofeffects on male reproductionA literature sur-vey.J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 14:2293-3327.

    KEY REFERENCESChapin and Conner, 1999. See above.

    This chapter provides an overview on how to ap-

    proach and carry out histopathological evaluationof the testis including the use of staging. It alsoreviews the inter-relationship of morphologicchanges in the testis with functional outcome anddiscusses the utility of sperm parameters.

    Creasy, 1997. See above.

    This key reference provides more in-depth consid-eration of the proper use of an understanding ofspermatogenesis in the histopathologic interpreta-tion of testis lesions, and will help the pathologist

    understand the proper application of staging in theregulatory framework.

    Creasy and Foster, 2001. See above.

    This chapter provides a general overview of thestructure, function and physiology of the male repro-ductive system as well as responses of the system to

    toxicologic disturbance.

    Knobil, E., Neill, J., Greenwald, G., Markert, C., andPfaff, D. 1994. The Physiology of Reproduction,2nd Ed. Raven Press, New York.

    This is an invaluable and comprehensive referencetext dealing with all aspects of reproductive physi-ology.

    Russell et al., 1990. See above.

    This is an essential reference text for beginners aswell as those experienced in testicular histopathol-ogy. It provides detailed instruction on how to iden-tify stages of the spermatogenic cycle in the rat,mouse, and dog. It also provides a wealth of infor-mation on testicular biology, histopathological andtoxicological evaluation, fixation, ultrastructureand much more.

    Contributed by Dianne M. Creasy

    Huntingdon Life SciencesEast Millstone, New Jersey

    Supplement 13 Current Protocols in Toxicology

    16.4.14

    Histopathology ofthe Male

    ReproductiveSystem II:

    Interpretation