current study programmes at geodetic department · kje smo? analiza razvojnih virov za modeliranje...

KJE SMO?KJE SMO?Analiza razvojnih virov za modeliranje Analiza razvojnih virov za modeliranje

funkcionalnih regij funkcionalnih regij –– prikaz stanja na prikaz stanja na obmoobmoččju Alp v Slovenijiju Alp v Sloveniji

““Za boljZa boljšše razvojne odloe razvojne odloččitve v Alpahitve v Alpah””

Doc. dr. Alma Zavodnik Lamovšek

Viš. pred. mag. Samo Drobne

Bovec, Sterguljčeva hiša,14.10.2010

Bovec14.10.2010

Univerza v Ljubljani

Fakultetaza gradbeništvo in geodezijo

OSNOVNI PODATKIOSNOVNI PODATKI––ALPSKI PROSTOR V SLOVENIJIALPSKI PROSTOR V SLOVENIJI



Bovec14.10.2010

OSNOVNI PODATKIOSNOVNI PODATKI–– GOSTOTA PREBIVALSTVAGOSTOTA PREBIVALSTVAAlpe so redko poseljeno območje z nizko gostoto prebivalstva-rarely settled a





Bovec14.10.2010



OSNOVNI PODATKI OSNOVNI PODATKI –– POLICENTRIPOLICENTRIČČNI URBANI NI URBANI SISTEM V SLOVENIJISISTEM V SLOVENIJI-- only three centres of the itnernational importance are in the Alpine convention area- based on small and medium sized cities, - only Ljubljana is big city (FUA by ESPON 1.1.1)- some centres are connected in conurbation

Bovec14.10.2010

URBANA OBMOČJA S POMEMBNEJŠIMI SREDIŠČI-prikaz števila prebivalcev v urbanih središčih



Developing index

Bovec14.10.2010

KJE SMO: POGLED NA SOSEDEKJE SMO: POGLED NA SOSEDE



Bovec14.10.2010



Bovec14.10.2010

OBMOOBMOČČJA DOSTOPNOSTI DO JA DOSTOPNOSTI DO URBANIH SREDIURBANIH SREDIŠŠČČ

Urban centres with highest level of public services equipped with regional hospital, higher court, university ...Urban centres with top level of public sevices equipped with secondary scool, local hospital, disctrict court …we modelled 45-minute and 30-minute accessibility to urban centres with highest respectively top level of public servicesResults:◦ At a first glance the analysis of distribution of public activities in

settlements in Slovenia shows that it is fairly balanced with the exception of some mountainous (Gorenjska) and underpopulated areas (Kočevje, Notranjska).

◦ The number of public activities is larger in settlements with high building density, especially in the centres along the Ljubljana–Celje–Maribor–Murska Sobota axis and the Jesenice–Ljubljana–Novo mesto axis.

◦ In south-west the conurbation of Koper–Izola–Piran stands out.



Bovec14.10.2010



Bovec14.10.2010

DOSTOPNOST DO AVTOCESTNIH DOSTOPNOST DO AVTOCESTNIH PRIKLJUPRIKLJUČČKOVKOV

measuring the different time (15, 30 and more than 30 minutes) for accessibility to the highway and motorway connectionscomparison beetwen year 2009 and 2025 with presumption that in 2025 the new motorway from north (Koroška) to south (SE Slovenia) will be build

Result:◦ The influence of the new motroway is very important to improve

regional and even local connectivity



Bovec14.10.2010



Bovec14.10.2010

DOSTOPNOST DO INFORMACIJSKO DOSTOPNOST DO INFORMACIJSKO TELEKOMUNIKACIJSKE TEHNOLOGIJE TELEKOMUNIKACIJSKE TEHNOLOGIJE (ADSL; UMTS, NeoWLAN)(ADSL; UMTS, NeoWLAN)

settlements with potential accessibility to the one, two or all of the ICT’s (data for year 2007)current and desired areas for accessibilty to the ICT’sComparison with the accessiblity to the municipality centres with car within intervales of 5 minutes CONCLUSION◦ All models of accessibility shows more or less the same

results: despite of the type of the connectivity the same areas have good accessiblity and the same stay out as peripherial areas



Bovec14.10.2010



Accessibility to the information-communication techology (ADSL; UMTS, NeoWLAN) by statistical region in Slovenia

Bovec14.10.2010



Area of current and desired accessibilty to the information-communication technology

Bovec14.10.2010



Accessiblity to the municipality centres with Accessiblity to the municipality centres with car within 5 minutes intervalescar within 5 minutes intervales

Bovec14.10.2010

FUNKCIONALNE REGIJEFUNKCIONALNE REGIJEna obmona območčju Alpskega prostoraju Alpskega prostora

• A functional region (FR) is a region characterized by a high frequency of intra-regional economic interaction. • The border of a labour market region is a good approximation

of the borders of a functional region(Eurostat 1999; OECD 2002).

• Functional regions have been calculated and tested for :

a) the most actual proposals of three, six and eight administrative regions (AR) in Slovenia;

b) urban centres (UC) of international and national importance of the Republic of Slovenia.



Bovec14.10.2010

PODATKI IN GRADIVAPODATKI IN GRADIVA

Data on inter-municipal commuting to work were acquired from Census 2002.

In 2002, there were a total of 287,272 inter-municipality commuters between 192 municipalities in Slovenia. App. 74% of them used cars, app. 9% by bus, less than 1.5% by train. 36,672 (1922-192) inter-municipality connections were analysed.



Bovec14.10.2010

METODOLOGIJA METODOLOGIJA –– Administrativne Administrativne regije vs. funkcionalne regijeregije vs. funkcionalne regije

Centres (self-sufficient municipalities) should fulfilled two conditions:

a) less than 35% of working population commute to other municipalities:

where is the sum of commuting frequencies of working population from the municipality i to (other) municipalities j,

is total number of workers who live and work in the municipality i, and is total number of commuters who leave to other municipalities jfrom the municipality i.

b) number of working places in the municipality should be at least:

35.0(%))(

(i) ≤+

=∑ ∑∑i i ji

ji

ff

ff

wffwi j iii &≥+= ∑ ∑

∑ jif )(

∑i if∑i jf

⎪⎩

⎪⎨

⎧

===

=8R if 15,000 6R if 20,000

R3 if 27,500

8

6

3

www

w&

&

&

&



Bovec14.10.2010

METODOLOGIJA METODOLOGIJA –– Administrativne Administrativne regije vs. funkcionalne regijeregije vs. funkcionalne regije

The chains of municipalities to the self-sufficient centres have been calculated automatically based on the maximum flows for three types of municipalities:a) the municipalities, that were directly connected with their maximum

commuting flow of working population to the central municipality;

b) municipalities that are connected with their maximum commuting flow via non-self-sufficient municipality to the one of the central municipality; and

c) the pairs of municipalities, which presented each other the destination of the maximum flows, have been connected to the region, in which the direction of the second maximum flow was oriented.



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: AR (3) vs. FR (3) REZULTATI: AR (3) vs. FR (3) Three administrative Three administrative regions (AR) regions (AR) andand three functional regionsthree functional regions (FR) (FR) iin Slovenian Slovenia



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: AR (6) vs. FR (6)REZULTATI: AR (6) vs. FR (6)Six administrative Six administrative regions (AR) regions (AR) and six functional regions and six functional regions (FR)(FR)in Sloveniain Slovenia



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: AR (8) vs. FR (9)REZULTATI: AR (8) vs. FR (9)EightEight administrative administrative regions (AR) regions (AR) and and ninenine functional regions functional regions (FR)(FR)(to administrative centres) (to administrative centres) in Sloveniain Slovenia



Bovec14.10.2010

ZAKLJUZAKLJUČČEK: AD vs. FREK: AD vs. FR

• Considering only quantitative criteria (centres), the proposal for six administrative regions of Slovenia is the most accordant with functional ones.• The average administrative region SLOVENIA

→ app. 254.000 residents and app. 3380 km2

• The average administrative region (NUTS 3) EU → app. 23 % bigger population and app. 60 % bigger territory.

• But, considering both quatitative and qualitative criterias, we suggest decision-makers to re-evaluate the concepts of nine – instead of eight –administrative regions of Slovenia.



Bovec14.10.2010

METODOLOGIJA METODOLOGIJA –– Funkcionalne regije Funkcionalne regije (FR) glede na izbrane urbane centre (UC)(FR) glede na izbrane urbane centre (UC)

Centre-based labour market approach (one-way commuter flows of inter-municipal working population) has been used.

15 urban centres (Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia 2004) have been used as self-sufficient municipalities.

Chains of municipalities from central municipalities were created till condition was satisfied:

where is the commuting frequency to the centre i at a location x, is the commuting frequency to the centre jat a location x, and is the extension of the functional region i.

}0)( and )()( :{ ≥≥= xfxfxfx ijiiFR)(xfi

)(xf j

iFR



Bovec14.10.2010

Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia (2004):Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia (2004):3 c3 centres of internationalentres of international andand 15 (3+12) centres of national importance, 15 (3+12) centres of national importance, 31 (3+12+16) centres of 31 (3+12+16) centres of regional and regional and 51 (3+12+16+20) centres of 51 (3+12+16+20) centres of interinter--municipal municipal importance with city clusters, agglomerations and importance with city clusters, agglomerations and FUAs (together 51 urban centres)FUAs (together 51 urban centres)



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: FR (3) glede na UC (3)REZULTATI: FR (3) glede na UC (3)Three functional regions Three functional regions (FR) (FR) defined by urban centres defined by urban centres (UC)(UC)of international importance in Sloveniaof international importance in Slovenia



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: FR (3) glede na UC (3)REZULTATI: FR (3) glede na UC (3)Three functional regions Three functional regions (FR) (FR) defined by urban centres defined by urban centres (UC)(UC)of national importance in Sloveniaof national importance in Slovenia

Population

Rank Functional regionNumber %

Number of

municipalities

1 Ljubljana 1,488,805 73.2 % 134

2 Maribor 454,793 22.4 % 72

3 Koper-Izola-Piran 88,764 4.4 % 4

Slovenia 2,032,362 100.0 % 210



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: FR (15) glede na UC (15)REZULTATI: FR (15) glede na UC (15)Fifteen functional regions Fifteen functional regions (FR) (FR) defined by urban centres defined by urban centres (UC)(UC)of national importance in Sloveniaof national importance in Slovenia



Bovec14.10.2010

REZULTATI: FR (15) glede na UC (15)REZULTATI: FR (15) glede na UC (15)Fifteen functional regions Fifteen functional regions (FR) (FR) defined by urban centres defined by urban centres (UC)(UC)of national importance in Sloveniaof national importance in Slovenia

Population

Rank Functional regionNumber %

Number of

municipalities

1 Ljubljana 627,565 30.9 % 412 Maribor 265,423 13.1 % 283 Celje 190,423 9.4 % 204 Novo mesto 110,081 5.4 % 145 Koper-Izola-Piran 108,778 5.4 % 76 Nova Gorica-Šempeter pri Gorici 101,908 5.0 % 117 Murska Sobota 99,237 4.9 % 238 Kranj 93,920 4.6 % 79 Brežice-Krško-Sevnica 79,075 3.9 % 710 Ptuj 73,859 3.6 % 1611 Velenje 67,868 3.3 % 1212 Slovenj Gradec-Ravne na Koroškem-Dravograd 67,778 3.3 % 1113 Jesenice-Radovljica-Bled 66,368 3.3 % 714 Zagorje ob Savi-Trbovlje-Hrastnik 44,750 2.2 % 315 Postojna 35,329 1.7 % 3

Slovenia 2,032,362 100.0 % 210



Bovec14.10.2010

ZAKLJUZAKLJUČČEK: Funkcionalne regije EK: Funkcionalne regije glede na izbrane urbane centreglede na izbrane urbane centre

• The functional regions of Slovenia have been delimitated using:• data on integrated urban system at the national and international levels;• data on commuter flows of inter-municipal working population.

• At both levels functional region of Ljubljanashows the huge functional influence in the hierarchical urban system of Slovenia – even in the area of Alpine convention.



Bovec14.10.2010

Hvala za pozornost!

Kontakt:

do.c. dr. Alma Zavodnik lamovšek, [email protected],

Viš. pred. mag. Samo Drobne,, [email protected]

www.fgg.uni-lj.si

Bovec, 14.10.2010



Bovec14.10.2010

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.fgg.uni-lj.si/

current study programmes at geodetic department · kje smo? analiza razvojnih virov za modeliranje...

Documents