cvt workshopcvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/2018/10/... · 2018. 10. 11. ·...

16
Consortium for Verification Technology CVT Workshop October 31 – November 1, 2018 Stilbene Cell for Radioxenon Detection Ciara Sivels 1 , Amanda Prinke 2 , Justin McIntyre 2 , Shaun Clarke 1 , Sara Pozzi 1 1 University of Michigan, 2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 11/01/2018

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    CVT WorkshopOctober 31 – November 1, 2018

    Stilbene Cell for Radioxenon DetectionCiara Sivels1, Amanda Prinke2, Justin McIntyre2, Shaun Clarke1, Sara Pozzi11 University of Michigan, 2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory11/01/2018

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Introduction and Motivation• Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban

    Treaty bans nuclear testing worldwide

    • Established a verification regime consisting of 4 continuously monitoring technologies:– Seismic– Infrasound– Hydro acoustic– Radionuclide

    2

    International Monitoring System: Radionuclide Stations

    67 radionuclide stations worldwide (red)80 total radionuclide stations planed (grey)25 radioxenon stations (R+)

    Ctbto.org

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Radioxenon for Nuclear Explosion Monitoring

    3

    • Noble gases can reach the surface even in underground explosions making clandestine testing difficult

    • Radioxenon has the highest cumulative fission yield of the noble gases produced

    • Radioxenon has been measured from a variety of sources such as Chernobyl, Fukushima, and DPRK nuclear tests

    1E-03

    1E-02

    1E-01

    1E+00

    1E+01

    1E+00 1E+02 1E+04 1E+06

    Ratio

    131m

    Xe/1

    33Xe

    133Xe Activity (mBq)

    NPP

    NPP

    Triga reactor

    Fukushima

    MIPF/NPP

    DPRK 2006

    DPRK 2013

    C. B. Sivels, A. M. Prinke, J. I. McIntyre, S. D. Clarkei, S. A. Pozzi, “Anticoincidence analysis for radioxenon detection,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 318, 1, pp. 561-567, 2018.

    Isotopic Ratio Plot

  • Consortium for Verification Technology4

    NaI(Tl)

    Plastic Cell

    Gas line to

    Plastic Cell

    γXe

    β

    Cooper M.W. et al. NIM A (2007) 579:426-430 doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.04.092

    Isotope Electron Energy(keV)Photon Energy

    (keV) Half-life

    131mXe 129 ~30 11.84 d133mXe 198 ~30 2.198 d133Xe 346 (endpoint) ~30 and 80 5.248 d135Xe 950 (endpoint) 250 9.14 h

    Simulation of the 4 radioxenon isotopes of interest

    PMT

    Radon

    Xe-135Xe-133

    Xe-131m

    Xe-133m

    Current Method to Measure Radioxenon

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    • Xe-133 interferes with metastable isotopes complicating source characterization

    • Radon interferes with all ROIs and its removal is a major system component

    • Memory Effect: Radioxenon diffuses into plastic raising the background of subsequent measurements and decreasing detector sensitivity

    DPRK Nuclear Test – February 2016

    5

    Radon Measurement

    Current Limitations to Radioxenon Detection

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Advantages of Stilbene• Improved energy resolution

    – Decreases ROI bounds leading to increased sensitivity

    • Pulse Shape Discrimination – Discrimination of radon alphas and xenon

    betas• Decreased memory effect

    – Improves detector sensitivity and extends measurement time

    • Alternative scintillator – Maintains geometry and efficiency

    6

    W.K. Warburton, “Stilbene Research to Support a Portable β/γ Scintillation Detector with Improved Radioxenon MDC's” RMR 2014

    PNNL plastic beta cell

    Stilbene Prototype (Manufactured by Inrad Optics)

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Overview of PNNL Experimental Campaigns• Side by side plastic and

    stilbene experiments– Gas line connected to both

    detectors– Stilbene cell volume is 20%

    larger– Solid angle difference

    • Experimental Campaign 1– Tested vacuum stability of cell

    • Experimental Campaign 2– Full characterization campaign

    Stilbene Plastic

    7

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Results: Xe-135 MeasurementPlastic

    Stilbene

    8

    • Ratio of coincidence to singles counts is less for stilbene compared to plastic suggesting gamma efficiency drop

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Results: Xe-133m and Xe-131m MeasurementsXe-133m

    9

    Xe-131m

    Plastic

    Stilbene• Beta spectra gated

    on 30-keV• 45-keV broadened

    for stilbene

    Plastic

    Stilbene

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Results: Detector Characterization• Stilbene resolution slightly

    improved – 2.2 keV FWHM decrease

    • Stilbene efficiency decreased – Average 15% decrease

    • Efficiency decrease for stilbene cell leads to increased minimum detectable concentration– Average 0.1 mBq/m3 increase

    10

    Resolution ComparisonXe-131m

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Results: Radon Pulse Shape Discrimination• The use of stilbene allows for the identification of alpha particles

    emitted by radon which can be used to mitigate interference

    • Results in 1% decrease in MDC for Xe-135 and can be used for environmental monitoring applications

    Radon Alpha/Beta Discrimination Experiment

    11

    NaI(Tl) Coincidence Spectrum Stilbene Spectrum

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Memory Effect Experiment• Testing for residual activity remaining in cells• Xe-133 was measured for 3 days

    12

    Plastic Stilbene

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Results: Memory Effect Analysis

    13

    Plastic Stilbene

    • Residual activity remaining: 4.5% plastic and 0.043% stilbene• Memory effect is approximately 100-times smaller• IMS stations would have extended time to measure atmospheric samples = increased sensitivity

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    CVT Impact• Numerous internships and experimental campaigns at PNNL

    • Participation in the 2017 CTBT Science and Technology conference in Vienna, Austria

    • Presentation at the International Noble Gas Experiment Conference sparked interest from CTBT partners

    • Research resulted in National Laboratory Impact Award

    14

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    Conclusion• The almost negligible memory effect of the stilbene cell can

    improve the overall sensitivity of the verification regime

    • A balance between light collection and ruggedness is needed for in-field use of the stilbene cell to maximize performance

    • Future work includes field measurements with the stilbene cell

    15

  • Consortium for Verification Technology

    The Consortium for Verification Technology (CVT) would like to thank the NNSA and DOE for the continued support of these research activities.

    This work was funded by the Consortium for Verification Technology under Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration award number DE-NA0002534

    Acknowledgements

    CVT Workshop�October 31 – November 1, 2018Introduction and MotivationRadioxenon for Nuclear Explosion MonitoringCurrent Method to Measure RadioxenonCurrent Limitations to Radioxenon DetectionAdvantages of StilbeneOverview of PNNL Experimental CampaignsResults: Xe-135 MeasurementResults: Xe-133m and Xe-131m MeasurementsResults: Detector CharacterizationResults: Radon Pulse Shape DiscriminationMemory Effect ExperimentResults: Memory Effect AnalysisCVT ImpactConclusionAcknowledgements