cycle issues draft - navajoplanners.files.wordpress.com€¦ · cycle issues draft 10/12/20 4:23 pm...

L64A-003B

Cycle Issues DRAFT 10/12/20 4:23 pm

1222 1st Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101-4154

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGODevelopment Services Department

Page 1 of 24

Project InformationDIGITAL-Navajo Apts NDP/SDP673279Project Nbr:

Mendez, MartinProject Mgr: (619) 446-5309 [email protected]: *673279*

Review Information

Cycle Type: Submitted: 09/25/2020 Deemed Complete on 09/25/20201 Preliminary Review

Closed:

LDR-Planning Review

10/06/2020

10/07/2020

09/25/2020Messina, Ana(619) 446-5131

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:

Reviewing Discipline:

Started:

Completed:

Assigned:Reviewer:09/25/2020Cycle Distributed:

10/07/2020Hours of Review: 7.75

[email protected]

. The review due date was changed to 10/08/2020 from 10/16/2020 per agreement with customer.

. The reviewer has indicated they want to review this project again. Reason chosen by the reviewer: First Review Issues.

. The reviewer has requested more documents be submitted.

. Your project still has 34 outstanding review issues with LDR-Planning Review (all of which are new).

Project Information Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 These comments are draft and subject to change until presented by the City's assigned Development Project Manager in conjunction with the project Assessment Letter. Staff is unable to process formal, intermediate plan changes and updates outside the full submitted cycle. A formal response to these comments must be made through the resubmittal process in response to the full Assessment Letter. Your DSD Development Project Manager can assist with further questions. (New Issue)

2 Proposed Scope of Work:Neighborhood Development Permit & Site Development Permit for New MDU development of 45 Residential Dwelling Units. (New Issue)

3 Site Location: The site is located on address 7005 Navajo Rd., identified as APN 674-520-5400. Site is within the Navajo Community Plan and it is zoned as CC-1-3. Applicable site overlays include, Montgomery Field Airport Influence area 2 & Mission Trails Design District Subarea 1. (New Issue)

Permit Process Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

4 Scope as proposed will require a Neighborhood Development permit as noted per Sec. 126.0402, (in lieu of a PDP) and Site Development permit as noted per Sec. 126.0502. (New Issue)

5 A decision on an application for a Site Development permit shall be made in accordance with Process Three, as noted per Sec. 126.0504, therefore all other concurrent permits in this project will follow same process. (New Issue)

6 An application for a Site Development permit may be approved only if the decision maker makes all the findings in Section 126.0505. (New Issue)

7 An application for a Neighborhood Development permit may be approved only if the decision maker makes all the findings in Section 126.0404. (New Issue)

General Review CommentsLand Use Plan

Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

8 Proposed scope of work only includes a Residential Use for the entire premise, however, the Community Plan designates the Land Use on this site as Commercial, which encourages facilities that can provide goods and services to the Community, and the applicable Base Zone CC-1-3 also requires a Mixed-use Development to allow for Residential uses, as noted per Sec. 131.0540. Therefore, staff assumes that the lack of a Commercial portion will be a request for Deviation per NDP proposal so please incorporate this into the Scope of Work on sheet AS.1 as (New Issue)

9 (cont.) well as the SDP requirement for compliance with the Mission Trails Design District. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Planning Review' review, please call Ana Messina at (619) 446-5131. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1

p2k v 02.03.38 Martin Mendez 446-5309

L64A-003B




Page 2 of 24


10 Mission Trails Design District overlay requires that design principles included within the Mission Trails Design Manual (MTDM) be incorporated into the project. Please incorporate language into the Plans (either on Title Sheet, Site Plan or Elevations) that show how the project supports the general policies for all Subareas (as applicable) and those specific to the Subarea 1 that covers the Site. (New Issue)

11 Elevation sheets note Façade materials but most of the options refer to Metal besides Glass & Stucco, so please indicate how proposal will comply with the Architectural Materials noted per Policy D of the MTDM that need to relate to the Regional Park environment. (New Issue)

12 Please clarify the maximum height proposed for the building, staff is aware that project proposes to deviate from the maximum structure height of 45'-0 per CC-1-3, but since the MTDM indicates a maximum 50'-0 height per policy E, elevation and section drawings need to clarify if the structure will be over 50'-0 as they currently show approx. heights only. (New Issue)

13 For the specific Subarea 1 policy A, please show how the project complies with the gradual height transition from the low scale commercial buildings located adjacent to W side. (New Issue)

14 Subarea 1 policy C & E also reference principles that need to mitigate a bulky or boxy appearance along facades, and staff can appreciate the building articulation proposed along the E & W sides but N side Elevation does not seem to provide enough of a height transition in between planes and therefore has an overall uniform appearance, please refer to subsections 1 & 2 of Policy E. (New Issue)

15 Please indicate how project complies with parking requirement per Subarea 1 Policy F. (New Issue)16 Please submit proposal to the corresponding Community Planning Group and provide reviewer with comments

or recommendations obtained from the group. (New Issue)

Development Permits Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

17 Please provide staff with written findings for all applicable items (deviation requests included) per Sec. 126.0505 & 125.0404. (New Issue)

18 Conditions may be noted as requirement for one or all Development permits. (note to reviewer for Draft conditions) (New Issue)

Base Zone & Overlays Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

19 If project will request a Deviation to not comply with the Commercial structure requirement per Sec. 131.0540(b) for the CC-1-3 please also indicate the request to deviate from the Ground Level residential restrictions as noted per 131.0540(c). (New Issue)

20 Please show the Curb to Property Line dimension along Front Side on Site Plan sheet AS.1, as indicated per Civil Sheets. (New Issue)

21 Please expand the FAR section on sheet AS.1 to include a full SF tabulation that indicates Areas for each proposed building and level that accounts to the total 51,476 SF shown. (New Issue)

22 Please revise the SF noted on Site Plan for the accessory building so it matches SF of 2,235 as shown per sheet A2.1. (New Issue)

23 Please indicate the number of units that will be affordable and Level of Income to corroborate request for a 50% Density Bonus and any applicable number of Incentives per Sec. 143.0740. (New Issue)

24 Please clarify if the Incentives/Deviations noted under Item 20 of sheet AS.1 are requested as part of Density Bonus Incentives or if these are Deviations to be processed within the Neighborhood Development permit. (New Issue)

25 Please indicate how structure will comply with Building Articulation requirement per Sec. 131.0554. Based on façade length along Navajo Rd. there needs to be a min 8 Plane requirement so please reference each plane on the Elevation sheet or separate exhibit. (New Issue)

26 For any required Density Bonus Incentive, please include justification as required per Sec. 143.0750. This can be incorporated into the Project Summary table of sheet AS.1. Upon verification of Affordable Project status. (New Issue)

27 Please include dimensions to the Common areas proposed on Site Plan sheet AS.1 to corroborate the min requirement of about 1,125 SF of Common Open Space per Sec. 131.0456. (New Issue)

28 Please indicate if any fences or retaining walls are proposed on Site Plan and indicate heights. (New Issue)29 Please provide overall dimensions for Refuse & Recyclable areas to verify compliance per Sec. 142.0810 (New

Issue)

30 Planning staff will defer to Transportation reviewer for Parking calculation, driveway requirements and all other Parking Regulations per SDMC Ch.14 Art.2 Div.5. (info only) (New Issue)

CAP Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

31 Staff will refer to answer provided in the CAP Consistency Checklist Step 1 page 4, once findings for applicable Land Use Plan are made. (note to reviewer). (New Issue)

32 Staff agrees that project complies with the Zoning designations, since Residential use is allowed per the CC-1-3 zone, but Applicant needs to incorporate how the lack of a Commercial structure will still comply with the Land Use designation of the Community Plan. (New Issue)



L64A-003B




Page 3 of 24


33 Please cross reference the location of all applicable items proposed as part of the Step 2 strategies within the Site Plan. (New Issue)

34 Staff will confer with management regarding Cool/Green roof option offered by applicant to determine if any other compliance needs to be met. (note to reviewer). (New Issue)



L64A-003B




Page 4 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Environmental

10/08/2020

10/08/2020

09/29/2020Dresser, Morgan(619) 446-5404

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 30 outstanding review issues with LDR-Environmental (all of which are new).

Prelim Review (Cycle 1) 10/202 Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 These comments are draft and subject to change until presented by the City¿s assigned Development Project Manager in conjunction with the project Assessment Letter. Staff is unable to process formal, intermediate plan changes and updates outside the full submitted cycle. A formal response to these comments must be made through the resubmittal process in response to the full Assessment Letter. Your DSD Development Project Manager can assist with further questions. (New Issue)

Project Scope Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

2 A request for a NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT and SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT to demolish an existing single-story commercial building and to construct a four story building with 45 multi-family units consisting of one-, two-, and three-bedroom units, a common lounge area, and laundry room. Additionally, the project proposes a two-story 2,235-square foot community building including an office, community room, computer room, ADA bathroom and maintenance room. Outdoor spaces would include a children¿s tot lot, gardens, and exercise areas. (New Issue)

3 The project would conform to the Affordable/In-Fill Housing and Sustainable Buildings Expedite Program by providing 44 affordable housing units. The project is requesting allowable incentives in the form of deviations including a increase in building height, a reduction of required parking, an increase in allowable FAR, and a reduction of private storage area. (New Issue)

4 The 1.02-acre project site is located at 7005 Navajo Road. The project site is designated community commercial and zoned CC-1-3 per the Navajo Community Plan. The project site is also within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Overlay Zone (Montgomery Field), and the Airport Influence Area (Montgomery Field-Review Area 2). (New Issue)

5 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 14070 in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, December 12, 1985, Designated as Parcel A of Certificate of Compliance recorded November 23, 1998 as an instrument No. 1998-0759153, of Official Records.) (New Issue)

Land Use Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

6 EAS defers to Planning Review on General Plan, community plan, and Land Development Code issues. Per the City's Significance Determination Thresholds, an inconsistency with a land use plan is not in and of itself a significant impact; the inconsistency would have to result in a secondary physical impact. EAS will coordinate with Planning Review staff. (New Issue)

Transportation Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

7 As a result of Senate Bill 743, an update was needed to address the required shift from a level of service (LOS) analysis to a vehicle-miles travelled (VMT) CEQA analysis. There is a project screening process, and new requirements for both a project¿s CEQA transportation impact analysis and Local Mobility Analysis (LMA). LDR Transportation is currently scoping the transportation document with the applicant; EAS defers to Transportation for further clarification and/or direction. (New Issue)

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Environmental' review, please call Morgan Dresser at (619) 446-5404. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 5 of 24


8 EAS staff has reviewed the submitted Climate Action Plan (CAP) Consistency Checklist. The following issues have been identified: (New Issue)

9 1. Contact Information, Project No./Name: Please include the project number along with the project name. (New Issue)

10 2. Step 1 Land Use Consistency: Please provide an explanation of how the project is consistent with the existing General Plan and Community Plan land use and zoning designations in the box provided.

¿The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan which identifies the site for XXXX; additionally, the project is consistent with the Peninsula Community Plan which designates the site for XXXX. Lastly, the project is consistent with the requirements of the XXXX zone.¿ (New Issue)

11 Additionally, outline how the project is meeting the intent of the General Plan, community plan, and zone designations. (New Issue)

12 3. Strategy 1 Energy & Water Efficient Buildings, No. 1, Cool/Green Roofs: State exactly what the project proposes to implement consistent with the requirements of Strategy 1 within the response box. For example, ¿The project shall install ¿ consistent with CAP Consistency Checklist requirements.¿ If the text cannot fit within the response box, state ¿Refer to attached response sheet.¿ (New Issue)

13 4. Strategy 3 ¿ Bicycling, Walking, Transit & Land Use, No. 3, Electric Vehicle Charging: State exactly what the project proposes to implement consistent with the requirements of this strategy within the response box. For example, ¿The project shall install ¿ consistent with CAP Consistency Checklist requirements.¿ If the text cannot fit within the response box, state ¿Refer to attached response sheet.¿ (New Issue)

14 5. Revise the attached response sheet accordingly. Please note that any question answered with a ¿no¿ could mean that your project has a significant unmitigated impact and would require the preparation of an environmental impact report. (New Issue)

15 6. Additional comments have been provided by LDR Planning and LDR- Transportation; refer to those individual reviewer¿s comments for further clarification.

Until all issues have been resolved EAS cannot provide a sign-off on the CAP Consistency Checklist. (New Issue)

Biological Resources Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

16 The project site is surrounded by existing residential and commercial development. Review of aerial and street level photography appears to show that the project site does not contain any sensitive biological resources. The project site does not contain any sensitive riparian habitat or other identified habitat community. Furthermore, the project site does not contain, nor is it adjacent to, MHPA designated lands. All pertinent information will be included within the appropriate environmental document. No further comment is required. (New Issue)

Geologic Conditions Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

17 The project lies within Geologic Hazard Category 52 (Other Terrain ¿ other level areas, gently sloping to steep terrain, favorable geologic structure, low risk). Per Information Bulletin 515, Geotechnical Study Requirements, a geotechnical investigation report is required. Geology Review has requested additional information; please refer to Geology Review comments for additional information and/or clarification. Please provide any new information to EAS. EAS will coordinate with Geology Review staff. (New Issue)

Health and Safety (Hazmat) Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

18 The project site is not listed as a hazardous materials site in public records databases (i.e., Envirostor, Geotracker). Therefore, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. All pertinent information will be included within the appropriate environmental document. EAS has no further comments related to this issue. (New Issue)

Historical Resources (Archaeol Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

19 The project site is located on the City¿s Historical Resources Sensitivity Map. Therefore, a record search of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) digital database was reviewed by qualified archaeological City staff to determine the presence or absence of potential resources within the project site. According to the CHRIS search, no sites are mapped within the project site. (New Issue)

20 No additional archaeological evaluation is recommended based upon the project location, site photographs, scope of work, previously disturbed nature of the site and negative CHRIS search. All pertinent information will be included within the appropriate environmental document. EAS has no further comments related to this issue. (New Issue)

Historical Resources (Built En

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Environmental' review, please call Morgan Dresser at (619) 446-5404. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 6 of 24


21 The City of San Diego criteria for determination of historic significance, pursuant to CEQA, is evaluated based upon age (over 45 years), location, context, association with an important event, uniqueness, or structural integrity of the building. Please clarify if any structures in excess of 45 years exist on site. (New Issue)

Tribal Cultural Resources Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

22 Upon formal submittal, this project will be subject to Tribal Consultation under AB 52. EAS staff will distribute notification to those Native American Tribes that formally engaged in the AB 52 process with the City for possible consultation on this project. Please note that a request for consultation must be submitted by the Native American Tribes within 30 days of initial notification. If no request is made, the environmental processing timeline will proceed. If a request for consultation is made, then the environmental processing timeline will be held in abeyance until the consultation pr (New Issue)

Hydrology/Drainage Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

23 EAS defers to Engineering Review on hydrology/drainage issues; please refer to Engineering Review comments for additional information and/or clarification. Engineering Review staff has requested additional information. Please also provide this information to EAS. EAS will coordinate with Engineering Review staff. (New Issue)

Water Quality Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

24 EAS defers to Engineering Review on water quality issues; please refer to Engineering Review comments for additional information and/or clarification. Engineering Review staff has requested additional information. Please also provide this information to EAS. EAS will coordinate with Engineering Review staff. (New Issue)

Paleontological Resources Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

25 According to the Geologic Map of the San Diego, California (Kennedy & Tan, 2008), the project site is underlain by Mission Valley Formation. Mission Valley Formation has a high sensitivity for paleontological resources. (New Issue)

26 Paleontological monitoring during grading activities may be required if it is determined that the project¿s earth movement quantity exceeds the Paleontological threshold (if greater than 1,000 cubic yards and ten feet deep for formations with a high sensitivity rating and if greater than 2,000 cubic yards and ten feet deep for formations with a moderate sensitivity rating). Please note that monitoring may be required for shallow grading (i.e.,

L64A-003B




Page 7 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Landscaping

09/29/2020

10/01/2020

09/28/2020Alaysa, kaylana(619) 446-5127

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 16 outstanding review issues with LDR-Landscaping (all of which are new).

09/29/2020 Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 Info Only - Project Background Info:

NAVAJO*100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITE PROGRAM*(Process 3) Neighborhood Development Permit & Site Development Permit to demo existing restaurant for the construction of a new multi-family housing complex with 44 units reserved for low income tenants, 1 staff unit, and common amenity space, at 7005 Navajo Rd. The 1.03-acre site is in the CC-1-3 zone and Mission Trails Design District within the Navajo Community Plan area. Council District 7.

(New Issue)

2 Info Only - Landscaping Requirements:

The following landscape comments below are in reference to the Navajo Community Plan and SDMC Landscape Regulations 142.0402.

(New Issue)

Notes Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

3 Revise 'Maintenance Note' to the following:

All required common landscape areas shall be maintained by the homeowners association. The landscape areas shall be maintained free of weeds, debris, and litter and all plant material shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition. Broken, damaged, diseased, dead, or removed plant material shall be satisfactorily treated or replaced in kind and equivalent size per the conditions of the permit or within 30 days or a final landscape inspection. (New Issue)

4 Add to 'Maintenance Note' the following:

All required landscape areas and irrigation in P/ROW shall be maintained by ABUTTING PREMISE OWNER. The landscape areas and irrigation shall be maintained free of weeds, debris, and litter, and all plant material shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition. Broken, damaged, diseased, dead, or removed plant material shall be satisfactorily treated/replaced per the conditions of the permit or within 30 days or a final landscape inspection.

(New Issue)

5 Revise from 'Street Trees' note to 'Trees' note.

Note: Per SDMC 142.0403, ALL trees apply.

(New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Landscaping' review, please call kaylana Alaysa at (619) 446-5127. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 8 of 24


6 Revise 'Tree' note to the following:

All TREES shall have a 40-sq.ft. root zone tree area. For STREET TREES within the public right-of-way the 40-sq.ft. tree root zone area shall meet the Minimum Separation Distance requirements per SDMC 142.04019 or if conflicts arise the street trees shall be located on the private property within 10 feet of the property line along that street frontage.

(New Issue)

7 Add to 'Tree' note the following:

A minimum distance of 4 feet shall be provided between any canopy tree and building.

(New Issue)

8 Info Only - Irrigation:

If recycled water will be proposed, PUD review and approval must be provided.

(New Issue)

9 Info Only - Notes - Permanent Monument:

If a monument will be proposed, may need to meet 'visibility area' requirements.

(New Issue)

10 Revise 'Notes' - Mulch:

Revise from 'minimum depth of 2 inches' to 'minimum depth of 3 inches'.

(New Issue)

Plans Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

11 Street Trees:

Expand 'scope of work' on plans to show existing and/or proposed street trees within the center median of Navajo Road.

Note: Refer to Navajo Community Plan (Pg 124) - "The following streets should receive first priority for such right-of-way improvements: Navajo Road, Mission Gorge Road, College Avenue and Waring Road. These improvements should include the planting of street trees as well as landscaping of the center median.

(New Issue)

12 Street Trees (continued):

Identify on plan and legend existing and/or proposed street trees within the center median of Navajo Road.

(New Issue)

13 Street Trees (continued):

Note: The Street Tree quantity requirements per SDMC 142.0409 shall apply along the street frontage of the private premises.

Assuming a 'street frontage' of 325.95 lineal feet / 30 = 11 Street Trees required.

Include a minimum of 11 Street Trees WITHIN THE PROW. Street Trees within the Street Yard is not acceptable, unless site conditions do not allow the installation of the street trees required by landscape regulation requirements in the parkway. If site conditions do not allow street trees, applicant must provide a written explanation response.

(New Issue)

14 Street Yard - Tree Requirements:

Within the Street Yard at least one-half of the required planting points shall be achieved with trees. Note: Street Trees REQUIRED WITHIN THE PROW do not count towards the required Street Yard tree point requirements; Thus, please revise to meet requirements mentioned.

Additional Note: A minimum distance of 4 feet shall be provided between any canopy tree and building.

(New Issue)



L64A-003B




Page 9 of 24


15 Info Only - Street Trees/Street Yard Trees/Shrubbery:

Note: Per Navajo Community Plan (Pg 124) - "Use trees and shrubbery along heavily traveled streets to help lessen effects of traffic noise."

(New Issue)

16 Walls:

Walls visible from the PROW which are greater than 5-ft in height shall have plant material to screen 80% of the wall within two years (to minimize bulk and mass).

- Identify the wall height (from TW to BW @ finish grade) visible from the PROW which appears to support a pedestrian ramp.

- Identify the wall height (from TW to BW @ finish grade) visible from the PROW which is east of the Loading Zone.

(New Issue)

17 VUA - Landscape Area:

Provide the dimension of the VUA plant median betwen the parking space and sidewalk. Note: A 40-sq.ft. tree root zone applies to ALL trees. At this time, the landscaping area for the more than half of the proposed VUA Trees appear to be significantly less than 5'-ft.

(New Issue)

18 VUA - Landscape Area (continued):

All planting areas and plants in or adjacent to a vehicular use area shall be protected from vehicular damage by providing a raised curb or wheel stop of at least 6 inches in height. Where the end of parking spaces abut a planting area that is less than 5 feet in width, 6-inch-high wheel stops or curbs shall be placed within the parking spaces, 2 feet from the edge of the planting area.

Please address.

(New Issue)

19 VUA - Trees:

The minimum tree size used in a vehicular use area shall be 24-inch box. Per Site/Linear Park Legend, at this time, VUA's minimum tree size is not met. Please address.

(New Issue)

20 Info Only - Outdoor Spaces:

Per Navajo Community Plan (Pg 15) - "Create privacy for each house and protect its outdoor spaces from view and noise. Develop alternate methods of handling setbacks to increase usable open space such as to minimize narrow, useless side yards, as well as to create an interesting streetscape."

At time of Bldg Permits, applicant should provide a planting layout/palette which will 'protect its outdoor spaces from view and noise.'

(New Issue)

Civil Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

21 Info Only - Trees:

All TREES shall have a 40-sq.ft. root zone tree area. For STREET TREES within the public right-of-way the 40-sq.ft. tree root zone area shall meet the Minimum Separation Distance requirements per SDMC 142.04019 or if conflicts arise the street trees shall be located on the private property within 10 feet of the property line along that street frontage. (New Issue)

22 Civil Sheets to show the 40-sq.ft. tree root zone for ALL trees. Staff recommend Civil and Landscape Architect to collaborate.

(New Issue)



L64A-003B




Page 10 of 24


23 Civil Sheet to include note below on Civil Sheets wherever 40-sq.ft. root zone tree area and utilities is shown:

Provide the following note on the Plan:MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCETraffic signals / stop signs - 20 feetUnderground utility lines - 5 feet (10' for sewer)Above ground utility structures - 10 feetDriveway (entries) - 10 feet (5' for residential streets < 25mph)Intersections (intersecting curb lines of two streets) - 25 feet

(New Issue)



L64A-003B




Page 11 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Engineering Review

10/07/2020

10/07/2020

09/29/2020Huynh, Khanh(619) 446-5299

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 21 outstanding review issues with LDR-Engineering Review (all of which are new).

1st review comments Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 The Engineering Review Section has reviewed the subject development and have thefollowing comments that need to be addressed prior to a Public Hearing. (New Issue)

2 With your next submittal, please provide a complete response to each of the issues listed in this report. The written response shall clearly, concisely and comprehensively address the issues raised and please specify on what page/sheet each issue was addressed. (New Issue)

3 The San Diego Water Board adopted Order No. R9-2013-0001, NPDES No. CAS0109266, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Draining the Watersheds within the San Diego Region. This project will be required to adhere to the City of San Diego Storm Water Standards in effect at the time of approval of ministerial permit. The current Storm Water Development Regulations became effective on February 16, 2016 and this project is subject to those regulations.

(New Issue)

4 This Priority Development Project will be required to the RETAIN 85th Percentile storm event. The definition of RETAIN will be to INFILTRATE or STORE the volume. If the applicant does not want to infiltrate or store the volume, they can use Bioretention to treat 1.5 times the volume or or use the Percent Capture Method to hold 75% of the Design Capture Volume. (continue below) (New Issue)

5 This Priority Development Project will be required to calculate BMP size for Hydromodification based on pre-development condition. Priority Development Projects with Hydromodification requirements will be required to avoid critical sediment yield areas.

(New Issue)

6 Please demonstrate how the project will comply with the current City Storm Water requirement for pollutant removal and HMP.

(New Issue)

7 A SWPPP is required for the project. (New Issue)8 Grading permit will be condition of approval. (New Issue)9 Revise the Grading Plan or add a Site Grading Plan. Show the proposed grading contours. Add a Grading Data

Table with cut/fill and import/export quantities, plus the depths of cut and fill. If the quantity is ZERO, add that value to the required Data Table.

(New Issue)

10 All drainage calculations shall be based on the Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP) requirements. Project must be designed so that runoff rates and durations are controlled to maintain or reduce pre-project downstream erosion conditions and protect stream habitat. (New Issue)

11 Add a discussion to the Drainage Study stating if the proposed project is required to obtain approval from the Regional Water Quality Control Board Under Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401 or 404. A complete explanation must be provided. Please note, if the proposed project is subject to regulations as set forth in CWA 401/404, approval from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board must be obtained prior to permit issuance.

(New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Engineering Review' review, please call Khanh Huynh at (619) 446-5299. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 12 of 24


12 Provide a Site Grading Plan. Show Sewer Mains, including the new laterals that serve the project. Call out the City Improvement Plan numbers. A search of City Records by your office may be required. (New Issue)

13 Please screen back the existing improvement (water main). Use lighter shade. (New Issue)14 Please revise the grading plan, to call out the driveways, adjacent to the site on Navajo Road to be

reconstructed per current City Standards. (New Issue)

15 Please refer to the San Diego Municipal Code, Table 142-05M for driveway's width. (New Issue)16 Add the visibility area triangles, per San Diego Municipal Code Diagram 113-02SS, at the driveways on Navajo

Road. For the driveway, show the visibility areas on private property which shall extend 10 feet inward along the driveway and along the property line. (New Issue)

17 Add a note that states: No obstruction including solid walls in the visibility area shall exceed 3 feet in height. Per SDMC Section 142.0409 (b)(2), Plant material, other than trees, located within visibility areas or the adjacent public right-of-way shall not exceed 36 inches in height, measured from the lowest grade abutting the plant material to the top of the plant material. (New Issue)

18 Please revise the Grading plan, to call out the replacement of damaged sidewalk, along the property frontage per current City Standard. (New Issue)

19 On the Site Grading Plan. Add a note that states: Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Owner/Permittee shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the ongoing permanent BMP maintenance, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

(New Issue)

20 On the Site Grading Plan. Add a note that states: Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Owner/Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the San Diego Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications.

(New Issue)


For questions regarding the 'LDR-Engineering Review' review, please call Khanh Huynh at (619) 446-5299. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 13 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Map Check

10/05/2020

10/07/2020

09/28/2020Arcillas, Antonio(619) 687-5951

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]


. The reviewer has indicated they want to review this project again. Reason chosen by the reviewer: Change In Project Scope.


. Your project still has 2 outstanding review issues with LDR-Map Check (all of which are new).

Comment 10/07/2020 Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 Information Only:Subject property was legally created by LLA in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act (SMA) and local ordinance with Certificate of Compliance Doc. No.1998-0759153, Recorded 11/23/1998, O.R.

(New Issue)

2 Mapcheck has no issue with this develoment.No further comment from Mapcheck. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Map Check' review, please call Antonio Arcillas at (619) 687-5951. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 14 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Transportation Dev

10/09/2020

10/09/2020

09/28/2020Alforja, Emanuel(619) 446-5294

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 28 outstanding review issues with LDR-Transportation Dev (all of which are new).

1st ReviewGeneral Comments


1 These comments are draft and subject to change until presented by the City's assigned Development Project Manager in conjunction with the project Assessment Letter. Staff is unable to process formal, intermediate plan changes and updates outside the full submitted cycle. A formal response to these comments must be made through the resubmittal process in response to the full Assessment Letter. Your DSD Development Project Manager can assist with further questions. (Information Only - No Action Required) (New Issue)

2 Project Scope: NAVAJO*100% AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITE PROGRAM*(Process 3) Neighborhood Development Permit & Site Development Permit to demo existing restaurant for the construction of a new multi-family housing complex with 44 units reserved for low income tenants, 1 staff unit, and common amenity space, at 7005 Navajo Rd. The 1.03-acre site is in the CC-1-3 zone and Mission Trails Design District within the Navajo Community Plan area. Council District 7. (New Issue)

3 General: Following comments are provided based on submitted information and proposed site plan. Per further information, other discipline review comments and possible changes in design, further comments or changes in comments might be provided in the next review cycle. (New Issue)

4 Trip Generation: The expected daily trip generation for the project is approximately 270 ADT with 21 AM (4 in, 17 out) peak hour trips and 24 PM (17 in, 7 out) peak hour trips. This is based on a rate of 6 daily trips/dwelling unit for the 45 dwelling units for Multiple Dwelling Units (Over 20 dwelling units/acre). (New Issue)

5 VMT Information: This project would be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact as a residential project because it is an affordable housing project with 44 of 45 units reserved for low-income tenants and 1 unit reserved for the manager. A detailed VMT Analysis may not be required. (New Issue)

6 For questions on this review please contact Emanuel Alforja @ [email protected] (Information Only - No Action Required). (New Issue)

Plans and Documents Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

7 Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist: Strategy 3 Question 3 - Why "No" selected for this strategy? (New Issue)

8 Site Plan: Please show and label the distance to the nearest transit stop on the site plan. (New Issue)9 Visibility Triangles: Please show visibility triangles at all proposed project driveways inward from the property

line per SDMC Section 113.0273 (b)(3). (New Issue)

10 Sight Distance: Please demonstrate provision of adequate sight distance (including vertical and horizontal as appropriate) at all proposed project driveways per City of San Diego Street Design Manual Section 6.1.3(8). (New Issue)

11 Driveway: Please label and dimension the driveway on sheet AS.1. Per Sheet C2.0 the proposed driveway is 32 ft wide. The maximum driveway width for multifamily residential is 25 ft per SDMC Table 142-05M. Please revise. (New Issue)

12 Existing Driveways: Please callout the existing driveway to be removed on the westside of the property and the existing driveway/access to remain on the southeast side of the property to remain on sheet AS.1. (New Issue)

13 Drive Aisle: Please label and dimension the drive aisle on the "Main Driveway" on sheet AS.1 (New Issue)14 Parking: Please demonstrate that the project is in a "medium demand" parking area per SDMC 142.0527(b)(3)

by providing the calculation of the Walkability Index and Transit Index per SDMC 142.0527(b). (New Issue)

15 Parking: Please clarify the incentive request for reduced parking. Per SDMC 142.0555, tandem spaces count as 2 spaces towards the off-street requirements. Project is proposing a total of 59 spaces with 13 tandem spaces. The total required, with "medium demand" is 53 spaces as stated in the "Project Summary" on Sheet AS.1. Is the incentive request to not provide visitor and/or motorcycle parking? (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Transportation Dev' review, please call Emanuel Alforja at (619) 446-5294. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 15 of 24


16 Parking: The "Project Summary" states that 14 tandem spaces are provided but only 13 are shown on the plans. Please resolve this discrepancy. (New Issue)

17 Parking: Per SDM 142.0555(a)(2), tandem spaces shall be assigned to the same dwelling unit, please note this on the plans. (New Issue)

18 Parking: Please label the dimensions of the parallel parking spaces. The minimum dimensions per SDMC Table 142-05K are 8 ft wide by 21 ft long. (New Issue)

19 Parking: It is unclear on the plans if there are walls, columns or other immovable objects within the tandem (covered/tuck under) parking, please call out any of the above on the plans and ensure that the parking space dimensions meet the requirements in SDMC Table 142-05K. (New Issue)

20 Bike Parking: Please provide calculations for the required Bicycle Parking per SDMC Table 142-05C. Please provide the required spaces, show and label them on the plans with the number of bike racks provided. (New Issue)

21 Loading Zone: Please dimension the proposed on-site loading zone. The dimensions must comply with SDMC 142.1010(c). Please demonstrate how loading vehicles are expected to maneuver into the designated zone with vehicles parked in the adjacent parallel spots with turn templates. (New Issue)

22 Trash Pickup: Please demonstrate how trash collection vehicles would maneuver into the enclosed trash collection room with turn templates. (New Issue)

23 Turnaround Areas: Please dimension the turnaround areas on the plans per SDMC 142.056(d)(3). (New Issue)24 Turnaround Area: Please clarify for what maneuver the "turnaround" within the main driveway is for on sheet

AS.1. If this is turnaround is for fire trucks, wouldn't fire just use access to the adjacent property to the east to loop around? (New Issue)

25 Frontage: For Navajo Road please show and call out all existing and proposed: curb, gutter, sidewalk width, driveways and their width, curb to property line distance, curb to centerline distance, street width, striping, and street lights. (New Issue)

26 Frontage: The existing functional classification of Navajo Road at this location is a 5-lane major road (3 EB and 2 WB) with Class 2 buffered bike lanes. The ultimate classification of Navajo Road is a 6-Lane Major Road with Class 2 bike lanes per the Navajo Community Plan. A minimum parkway of 14 feet should be provided per current City standards with non-contiguous sidewalks. (New Issue)

27 Drafting: Please provide a more distinctive symbol for the property line on sheet AS.1. (New Issue)28 Drafting: Please change references from "Handicap" or "HC" to "Accessible". (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Transportation Dev' review, please call Emanuel Alforja at (619) 446-5294. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 16 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

Plan-Public Facilities Planning

10/01/2020

10/01/2020

09/25/2020Gastelum, Alfonso(619) 236-7167

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]



New Issue Group (4055834)Discretionary & Prelim Reviews

DIF - Residential Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 Development Impact Fees (DIF) are required at building permit issuance based on increased residential development and/or a change to existing land use. The currently adopted Navajo DIF rate for residential development is $7,943 per multi-dwelling unit. Rates are subject to change. (New Issue)

RTCIP Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

2 RTCIP Fees on residential development are required at building permit issuance. These fees were established to ensure that new Development invests in the Region's transportation system to offset the negative impact of growth on congestion and mobility. The current City RTCIP Fee is $3,009 per single-dwelling unit and/or $2,408 per multi-dwelling unit. On-site affordable housing units are exempt from the City RTCIP Fee. To qualify for this exemption, a recorded Affordable Housing Agreement with the Housing Commission must be submitted to Facilities Financing prior to building permit issuance. (New Issue)

Current Impact Fee Schedule Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

3 The Impact Fee Schedule outlines the fees which Facilities Financing collects at building permit issuance as part of the costs of land development in the City of San Diego. Fees can be paid in person at DSD or through OpenDSD at http://opendsd.sandiego.gov/web/invoices/. The fee schedule can be accessed on the City web site at: https://www.sandiego.gov/facilitiesfinancing

Fees are subject to increase at the beginning of each new fiscal year (July 1), each new calendar year (Jan 1), and/or upon Council approval of an update to the Public Facilities Financing Plan and/or Impact Fee Study. (New Issue)

REQUIRED DISCRETIONARY NOTICE Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

4 NOTICE - These comments are draft and subject to change until presented by the City's assigned Development Project Manager in conjunction with the project Assessment Letter. Staff is unable to process formal, intermediate plan changes and updates outside the full sumbittted cycle. A formal response to these comments must be made through the resubmittal process in responses to the full Assessment Letter. Your DSD Development Project Manager can assist with further questions. (New Issue)

Residential Bldg PermitResidential (with fees)


5 This imposition of fees may be protested within 90 days of the date of this notification pursuant to California Government Code § 66020. Any protest of the fees requires tendering of the fees in full when due and service of written notice to the City indicating the factual elements of the dispute and the legal theory forming the basis for the protest. Contact the reviewer for further information. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Plan-Public Facilities Planning' review, please call Alfonso Gastelum at (619) 236-7167. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 17 of 24


6 CREDIT FOR DEMOLITION: To be considered for impact fee credit for demolition of building(s) on-site, submit a copy of the completed Demolition Permit and Residential or Commercial Building Record.

(New Issue)

7 Applicant may request a deferral of Development Impact Fees (DIF). A Fee Deferral Agreement must be processed by the applicant, properly executed, duly recorded, and the applicable administration fee paid to defer the collection of DIF. The DIF can be deferred for a maximum period of two years, or until request for Final Inspection, whichever occurs earlier. The Final Inspection shall not be scheduled until the applicable DIF is paid. (New Issue)

8 Development Impact Fees (DIF) and Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP) Fees are subject to increase at the beginning of each new fiscal year (July 1), and/or upon Council approval of an update to the applicable DIF plan. (New Issue)

9 If you are providing INCLUSIONARY HOUSING (IH) on the same premises as your market-rate units, yoiu may eligible for a DIF WAIVER for a portion of the IH units. Contact reviewer to confirm eligibility. Evidence of recorded Affordable Housing Agreement is required. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Plan-Public Facilities Planning' review, please call Alfonso Gastelum at (619) 236-7167. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 18 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

LDR-Geology

10/06/2020

10/07/2020

09/25/2020Washburn, Jacobe(619) 446-5075

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 6 outstanding review issues with LDR-Geology (all of which are new).

673279-1 (10/7/2020)References:


1 Geotechnical Investigation, Navajo road Multi-Family Development, 7005 Navajo Road, prepared by Atlas, dated April 21, 2020 (their project no. 200056N)

Development plans: Navajo Family Apartments, San Diego - California, prepared by Rodriguez Associates Architects & Planners, Inc., dated September 1, 2020; civil sheets by Project Design Consultants.

(New Issue)

Review Comments: Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

2 Submit an addendum geotechnical report or update letter that specifically addresses the proposed development for the purposes of environmental review and the following:

(New Issue)

3 Provide an updated geologic/ geotechnical map that shows the distribution of fill and geologic units, location of exploratory excavations, and currently proposed development/ project on a topographic base map. The map should also circumscribe the limits of recommended remedial grading.

(New Issue)

4 The geotechnical consultant must indicate if the site is suitable for the proposed development as designed or provide recommendations to mitigate the geologic hazards to an acceptable level.

(New Issue)

5 The project's geotechnical consultant should provide a conclusion regarding if the proposed development will destabilize or result in settlement of adjacent property or the City of San Diego Right-of-Way.

(New Issue)

6 NOTE - Storm Water Requirements for the proposed conceptual development will be evaluated by LDR-Engineering review. Priority Development Projects (PDPs) may require an investigation of storm water infiltration feasibility in accordance with the Storm Water Standards (including Appendix C and D). Check with your LDR-Engineering reviewer on requirements. LDR-Engineering may determine that LDR-Geology review of a storm water infiltration evaluation is required

(New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'LDR-Geology' review, please call Jacobe Washburn at (619) 446-5075. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 19 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

Park & Rec

10/12/2020

10/12/2020

09/30/2020Scoggins, Shannon(619) 236-6894

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]



10-12-20 issues Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 There are no population-based park, adjacent open space park or Maintenance Assessment District issues associated with the proposed development. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Park & Rec' review, please call Shannon Scoggins at (619) 236-6894. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 20 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

Housing Commission

10/06/2020

10/08/2020

10/06/2020Mendez, Martin(619) 446-5309

Submitted (Multi-Discipline)

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 9 outstanding review issues with Housing Commission (all of which are new).

MIR Cycle Issues Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 This project is subject to the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Regulations of San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 13.

The applicant requests a density bonus pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article 3, Division 7. The underlying zoning of the property allows for the development of 30 units.

* The applicant proposes 31% of the project (30 units x 33% = 9.9 rounded to 10 units) will be affordable to low income households with rents at 30% of 60% of Area Median Income (AMI) for a period of 55 years. (New Issue)

2 (Continued) By providing those affordable units, the project will meet the requirements of San Diego Municpal Code Section 143.0720(i)(3) which provides for a 50% density bonus (30 units x 50% = 15 units) for a total of 45 units. The project is eligible for 4 incentives. (New Issue)

3 * The Inclusionary Affordable Housing Regulations require the applicant to provide 1 unit (30 units x 2% = 0.6 rounded to 1 unit) affordable to low income households with rents at 30% of 60% of Area Median Income for a period of 55 years. Therefore, provision of the 10 density bonus affordable units at 60% AMI shall also satisfy the applicant's obligations under the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Regulations. (New Issue)

4 * The project will be 100% affordable (with the exception of the manager's unit). (New Issue)5 * The applicant must submit the Housing Commission Density Bonus Application with required documentation

for processing. Contact Hannah Diaz at [email protected] or (619) 578-7585 to obtain a copy of the application. (New Issue)

6 The project plans indicate the demolition of a commercial structure. The demolished structure does not contain residential dwelling units, and therefore is exempt from replacement unit requirements per California Government Code 65915.

The 10 affordable rental units must be provided in a comparable mix to the total development. Comparability will be determined by the San Diego Housing Commission. (New Issue)

7 Prior to issuance of any building permit associated with this Project, the Owner/Permittee shall demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Regulations of Chapter 14, Article 3, Division 7 of the San Diego Municipal Code and Inclusionary Affordable Housing Regulations of San Diego Municipal Code Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 13. The Owner/Permittee shall enter into a written Agreement with the San Diego Housing Commission which shall be drafted and approved by the San Diego Housing Commission, executed by the Owner/Permittee, and secured by (continued) (New Issue)

8 (Continue) a deed of trust which incorporates applicable affordability conditions consistent with the San Diego Municipal Code. The Agreement will specify that in exchange for the City¿s approval of the Project, which contains a 50% density bonus (15 units in addition to what is permitted by the underlying zoning regulations), alone or in conjunction with any incentives or concessions granted as part of Project approval, the Owner/Permittee shall provide 10 affordable units with rents of no more than 30% of 60% of AMI for no fewer than 55 years. (New Issue)

9 For questions contact:Hannah Diaz, Special Programs Manager(619) [email protected] (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Housing Commission' review, please call Martin Mendez at (619) 446-5309. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 21 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

Environmental Services Dept

09/25/2020

09/30/2020

09/25/2020Wood, Lisa(858) 573-1236

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 1 outstanding review issues with Environmental Services Dept (all of which are new).

New Issue Group (4055096) Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 A Waste Management Plan will be needed for this project. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Environmental Services Dept' review, please call Lisa Wood at (858) 573-1236. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 22 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

PUD-Water & Sewer Dev

10/07/2020

10/07/2020

09/28/2020Nguyen, Gary(619) 446-5454

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 9 outstanding review issues with PUD-Water & Sewer Dev (all of which are new).

Informational Items: Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 Water and sewer capacity charges will be due at the time of building permit issuance. Capacity charges, as well as service and meter size, are determined by the Water Meter Data Card which is completed during the building plan review process. Any questions regarding water and sewer capacity fees should be addressed to Information and Application Services (619-446-5000). (New Issue)

2 All on-site water and sewer facilities shown on the drawings are private and shall be designed to meet the requirements of the California Uniform Plumbing Code and shall be reviewed as part of the building permit plan check. (New Issue)

3 All proposed public water and sewer facilities, must be designed and constructed in accordance with established criteria in the most current edition of the City of San Diego Water and Sewer Facility Design Guidelines and City regulations, standards and practices pertaining thereto. (New Issue)

4 If it is determined that the existing water and sewer services are not of adequate size to serve the proposed project, the applicant will be required to abandon (kill) any existing unused water and sewer services and install new service(s) and meter which must be located outside of any driveway or vehicular use area. (New Issue)

5 All water services to the site, including domestic, irrigation, and fire will require private, above ground, back flow prevention devices (BFPDs). BFPDs are typically located on private property, in line with the service and immediately adjacent to the right-of-way. The Public Utilities Department will not permit the required BFPDs to be located below grade or within the structure. (New Issue)

6 No trees or shrubs exceeding three feet in height at maturity shall be installed within ten feet of any sewer and five feet of any water facilities. (New Issue)

7 Please direct any questions you may have regarding the information, comments, or conditions contained in this review to Gary Nguyen via email at [email protected]. (New Issue)

1st Review Comments: Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?


9 Please reconfigure the BFPD in line with the irrigation service. (New Issue)

10 Key Notes No. 8 and 9 indicates two BFPDs for the irrigation service. Only one BFPD is required. Why are two BFPDs utilized? (New Issue)

11 Please indicate the proposed sewer lateral as private and an EMRA required. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'PUD-Water & Sewer Dev' review, please call Gary Nguyen at (619) 446-5454. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 23 of 24


12 Please provide an enlarged detail of the sewer lateral connection to the existing sewer manhole. Please also, call out the separation distance between the proposed sewer lateral and existing water at the sewer manhole. (New Issue)

13 Per Section 2.8 (System Reliability) of the City's Water Design Guide, water mains serving more than two hydrants or more than 30 homes must be looped, fed from two sources¿. Please show a second source of water supply for the project. (New Issue)

Sewer Study Comments: Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

14 Please provide a copy of the Archstone Mission Trails development's approved sewer study. (New Issue)

15 Please use 3.5 population/DU for all bedroom units and update the peak flow. (New Issue)

16 On the Sewer Summary Study Table 5 and 6, please provide all hydraulic information for each sewer main segment (manhole to manhole). (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'PUD-Water & Sewer Dev' review, please call Gary Nguyen at (619) 446-5454. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 24 of 24

Review Information


Closed:

Fire-Plan Review

09/28/2020

09/28/2020

09/28/2020Velasquez, Jaime(619) 533-4481

Preliminary Review

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 10 outstanding review issues with Fire-Plan Review (all of which are new).

Fire 1 Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

1 Provide a full size sheet titled "Fire Access Plan". Refer to policy A-14-1 for access requirements: sandiego.gov/fire, Services and Programs, Policies, Fire Access Roadways. The Fire Access Plan may also be refered to as the FAP in comment(s).

Plans must comply with the current adopted California Fire Code (to include appendix D as adopted) /California Building Code. (New Issue)

2 Provide Fire Access Plan at an engineering scale; 20, 30, 40, 50, 60. Turn radius shall comply with the following criteria, as approved by AHJ; Turns shall have a 30 ft. inside radius and a 50 ft. outside radius, or comply with the SDFD turn radius template(s), or use of an approved CAD software turn compliance tool that is SDFD apparatus specific. If a copy of the turn templates is required to verify before submittal; contact Fire Plan reviewer. A pdf of templates can be obtained via email. The user must verify that the templates hold scale upon reproduction. (New Issue)

3 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on FAP) "Aerial fire access road(s) adjacent to buildings that are greater than 30 feet in height from grade plane, shall have a minimum width of 26 feet. The proximal edge of Aerial fire access shall be a minimum of 15-30 feet from the building facade(s) and/or plumb line of eave(s). Aerial access shall be provided along one entire long side(s) of the building(s). Show ALL proposed locations where aerial access is being provided. (See CFC appendix D/FPB Policy A-14-1)" (New Issue)

4 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the Fire Access Plan) "Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. CFC 503.2.5. See Appendix D CFC Figure D103.1 Radius 30' inside 50' outside." (New Issue)

5 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the FAP) "Post indicator valves, fire department connections, and alarm bell are to be located on the address/access side of the structure. CFC 912.2.1" (New Issue)

6 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the FAP) " All required hose pulls are shown to reach all portions of the EXTERIOR of the building(s) per policy A-14-1. Hose pull is measured from the fire apparatus (engine) when the fire engine is in a fire access road/lane. Hose pull can be measured from multiple locations within the access road/lane. The hose pulls must connect or overlap to show complete coverage. For a sprinklered building(s); the maximum hose pull is 200'. For non-sprinklered building(s); the maximum hose pull is 150'. Change in vertical elevation must also be accounted for." (New Issue)

7 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the Fire Access Plan) "All existing and/or proposed fire hydrants within 600' of the project site and a 300' radius overlay shall be shown to encompass ALL portions of ALL structures as part of submitted project. SD Ordinance 17927." (New Issue)

8 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the FAP) "ALL red curb/No parking sign areas have been shown with a key indicator. ALL required access roadways shall not provide less than the required/approved width and/or be obstructed in any manner, including the parking of vehicles. Where inadequate width has not provided for parking along access roadways, then such access shall be kept clear by the posting of signs or the painting of curbs per policy A-14-1." (New Issue)

9 (Provide as a NOTE and SHOW on the FAP) "CFC 504.3 - New buildings four or more stories above grade plane, except those with a roof slope greater than four units vertical in 12 units horizontal shall be provided with a stairway to the roof in accordance with 1011.12. Such stairway shall be marked at street and floor levels with a sign indicating that the stiarway continues to the roof." (New Issue)

10 (Provide as a NOTE on FAP) "General Stretcher Requirements - All buildings and structures with one or more passenger service elevators shall be provided with, NOT less than one medical emergency service elevator to all landings meeting the provisions of CBC section 3002.4a. ****Exception for an under-sized "gurney elevator" shall NOT be considered/approved by the Fire Plan reviewer if only ONE gurney elevator will be provided.*****" (FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT MAY LEAD TO A NON-APPROVED CONDITION BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL; LOCAL JURISDICTION WILL NOT PROVIDE RELIEF) (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'Fire-Plan Review' review, please call Jaime Velasquez at (619) 533-4481. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 1


L64A-003B




Page 1 of 2

Project InformationDIGITAL-Navajo Apts NDP/SDP673279Project Nbr:

Mendez, MartinProject Mgr: (619) 446-5309 [email protected]: *673279*

Review Information

Cycle Type: Submitted: 09/29/2020 Deemed Complete on 09/29/20205 REA-Airports (Submit)

Closed:

REA-Airports

10/02/2020

10/02/2020

10/02/2020Mendez, Martin(619) 446-5309

REA-Airports (Submit)

Review Due:

Next Review Method:


Started:

Completed:



[email protected]




. Your project still has 6 outstanding review issues with REA-Airports (all of which are new).

MIR Cycle IssuesInformational


1 Comments have been received from Real Estate Assets, Airport Division regarding the location of this project in the Montgomery Gibbs Executive Airport. Please contact David Reed at (858) 573-1414 or via email at [email protected]. (New Issue)

2 The City of San Diego Real Estate Assets Department - Airports Division (Airports) has reviewed the information provided on the proposed Navajo Apartments NDP/SDP project, as referenced in documents provided September 29, 2020 via email. (New Issue)

3 Airports reviews proposed projects around Montgomery Gibbs Executive Airport (MYF) carefully for safety and those that may introduce non-compatible land uses that may raise significant safety concerns. MYF is a busy general aviation airport, categorized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as a Regional Asset. The airport is open to the public 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The types of aircraft that use the airport vary from small single-engine pistons to corporate jects, military aircraft, and helicopters. With over 200,000 annual operations, MYF ranks among the (Continued) (New Issue)

4 (Continued) top 10 busiest general aviation airports in the nation. (New Issue)5 Based on the information provided, and per the MYF's adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP),

the site appears to be located within MYF's Airport Influence Area (AIA) Review Area 2, which has limits on the heights of structures, particularly in areas of high terrain. (New Issue)

6 The Project plans state that the project has a 52 feet height limit. Since the project is approximately 5.1 miles east in distance from the airport, it and/or objects used to construct/develop the proposed structure(s) may penetrate navigable airspace which could affect air safety due to low flying aircraft utilizing an instrument approach in the area. (New Issue)

7 Additionally, due to the location of the proposed development "immediately adjacent to the Airport Overflight Notification Area," the proposed development is subject to overflights and single event noise exposure levels due to aircraft activity. (New Issue)

Action Items Issue Num Issue Text Cleared ?

8 With the previously mentioned information, Airports Division respectfully requests the following actions be taken on behalf of the project applicant and developer to address, potential incompatibilities of the proposed site, should they decide to move forward: (New Issue)

9 1. The applicant/developer shall be restricted to any structure heights that would penetrate Part 77 Navigable Airspace within its boundaries. It shall also restrict the heights of temporary cranes and equipment erected during construction activities. Therefore, the developer shall be directed to file Notices of Proposed Construction or Alteration (Form 7460-1) with the Federal Aviation Administration and obtain Notices of Determination to ensure no objects related to this project present hazards to air navigation; (New Issue)

10 2. Ensure all overhead lighting is always directed downward to avoid glare; (New Issue)

11 3. Secure all trash/storage containers to detour birds from flocking in the MYF Traffic Pattern Zone (TPZ), and; (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'REA-Airports' review, please call Martin Mendez at (619) 446-5309. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 5


L64A-003B




Page 2 of 2


12 The developer be required to provide a fair disclosure to residents of the location of the airport, the traffic patterns of the airport, and the potential impact of singleÂ-event noise and safety. (New Issue)

13 In the interest of safety, airport compatibility and proper urban planning, Airports looks forward to assisting you during this process. Should you have any questions please contact David Reed at (858) 573-1414, or via e-mail at [email protected]. (New Issue)

For questions regarding the 'REA-Airports' review, please call Martin Mendez at (619) 446-5309. Project Nbr: 673279 / Cycle: 5
