F-theoretic MSSMs at Weak Coupling

Damián K. Mayorga Peña

Based on arXiv: 1707.xxxx, in collaboration with Roberto Valandro

StringPheno, Virginia Tech, July 4, 2017

Plan

• Introduction and motivation• The Sen limit of an MSSM-like model• A two U(1) model• (not so) Exotic Ma�er in the type IIB limit

• Conclusions and Prospects

2 of 14

Introduction and motivation

• F-theory exhibits a promising phenomenology, mostly explored in thecontext of SU(5) GUTs.

Antoniadis, Beasley, Braun, Colinucci,Dolan, Dudas, Grimm, Hayashi, Heckman, Keitel, Leontaris, Marchesano, Marsano,Mayrhofer, Palti, Schäfer Nameki, Vafa,Valandro, Watari, Weigand,. . .

• ...there are (in principle) other alternatives. Here we consider some of suchalternatives motivated from the study of toric hypersurface fibers...thebare MSSM and a U(1) extended MSSM,

Lin, Weigand’14’16; Grassi, Halverson, Shaneson, Taylor’14; Cvetič, Klevers, DM, Oehlmann, Piragua, Reuter’15; see Ling’s,Mirjam’s and Wati’s talks

• Do these constructions have a description as intersecting D7 orientifoldmodels in perturbative type IIB string theory?

Blumenhagen, Grimm, Jurke, Weigand’09; Krause, Mayrhofer, Weigand’12

3 of 14

Introduction and motivation

An MSSM-like modelCvetič, Klevers, DM, Oehlmann, Piragua, Reuter’15

The fiber is cut by the cubic

pF11 = s1e21e22e3e

44u

3 + s2e1e22e23e

24u

2v + s3e22e23uv

2

+ s5e21e2e34u

2w + s6e1e2e3e4uvw + s9e1vw2

as {pF11 = 0}.It can be mapped to the WSF by means of Nigell’s algorithm, with

f =148

[−s26 + . . .] , g =1864

[s66 + . . .] , ∆ =116

s23s39[. . .]

Hence we have an SU(3) at {s9 = 0} and an SU(2) at {s3 = 0}, as well as tworational sections with fiber coords:

S0 : [x : y : z] = [1 : 1 : 0] , S1 : [x : y : z] =

[s26 − 4s2s9

12:s3s5s92

: 1].

These sections provide the hypercharge U(1) generator.4 of 14

Introduction and motivation

at codimension two:

Representation Locus

(3, 2)1/6 V(I(1)) := {s3 = s9 = 0}(1, 2)−1/2 V(I(2)) := {s3 = s2s25 + s1(s1s9 − s5s6) = 0}(3, 1)−2/3 V(I(3)) := {s5 = s9 = 0}(3, 1)1/3 V(I(4)) := {s9 = s3s25 + s6(s1s6 − s2s5) = 0}(1, 1)1 V(I(5)) := {s1 = s5 = 0}

the chiralities are obtained a�er fixing the (vertical) G4-flux, which by recentmethods can be obtained in a base independent fashion.

Lin, Weigand’16

H (4,4)(X) ∼=Q[DA]4 ∧ [PF11 ]SRI + LIN

⊂ H (5,5)(X5) .

For this case, the flux expression reads

G4 = F ∧ σ(S1) + Λ(6[K−1

B ]2 + [K−1B ]S0 + S20 − 5[K−1

B ]S7 + S27 − 2[K−1

B ]S9 + S7S9)

5 of 14

The Sen limit of an MSSM

Sen’96; see Iñaki’s talk

Make the coord. change s = x − b2z2/3, with b2 =s264 − s2s9, such that the

section S1 touches the fiber at s = 0. The WSF reads

y2 = s3 + b2s2z2 + 2b4sz4 + b6z6 ,

with

b4 =s3s92

(− s5s6

2+ s1s9

), b6 =

s23s25s

29

4.

se�ing the scalings s1 → εs1, s5 → εs5, one gets b2 → b2, b4 → εb4, b6 → ε2b6.

• Gauge symmetry SU(3)× SU(2)× U(1) for any ε.

• For ε = 0 the fiber degenerates globally. Be�er study a resolved case

y2 = s3λ+ b2s2z2 + 2b4tsz4 + b6t2z6

with s 7→ sλ, y 7→ yλ and ε 7→ tλ.6 of 14

The Sen limit of an MSSM

• At λ = t = 0

X3 : ξ2 =s264− s2s9 ;

with ξ = y/sz.

• In the limit λ→ 0, the equation

WE : y2 = b2s2z2 + 2b4tsz4 + b6t2z6

defines a P1 fibration degenerating whenever:

∆E =s23s

39

4(s1s5s6 − s2s25 − s21s9

)= 0 .

• Non Abelian symmetry is preserved in the Sen limit. Remaining pieceresponsible for the U(1).

7 of 14

The Sen limit of an MSSM

• U(3):

X3 ∩ {s9 = 0} : (ξ − s6/2)(ξ + s6/2) = 0 .

We denote W = {s9 = 0} ∩ {ξ − s6/2 = 0} and its imageW = {s9 = 0} ∩ {ξ + s6/2 = 0}.

• SU(2): U = {s3 = 0} ∪ X3, does not split. Sp(2) ≡ SU(2).

• U(1): X3 ∩ {s1s5s6 − s2s25 − s21s9 = 0} splits in such a way that

V = 4DO7 − (W + 2W )− U , V = σ∗V ,

consistent with D7 tadpole cancellation

(V + V ) + 2U + 3(W + W ) = 8DO7 .

8 of 14

The Sen limit of an MSSM

The curve (3, 1)1/3 splits at leading order in ε

{s9 , ε2 s3s25 + εs6(s1s6 − s2s5)} ,

the split curves are (3, 1)(+1,−1) at{s9, (s1s6 − s2s5)} and (3, 1)(0,2) at {s9, s6}.

Hypercharge

QY =16

(3QV + QW ) ,

Representation

(3, 2)(0,1) WU

(3, 1)(−1,−1) WV

(3, 1)(1,−1) W V

(3, 1)(0,2) WW

(1, 2)(−1,0) UV

(1, 1)(2,0) VV

9 of 14

The Sen limit of an MSSM

Matching Fluxes Gauge fluxes are constrained by cancellation of D5tadpoles

0 = W−(3FW+ + FV+) + 3W+(FW− − FV−) + 2U (FU− − FV−)

• Pure even:

(FW+ , FV+) = (

2λ3DO7, 0) , (FW+ , F

V+) = (

16F ,−1

2F) ..

• Pure odd: FW− = FV− = FU− (can be reabsorbed in the B field).

• Mixed:

(FW+ , FW− ) = α(−1

3W+,

13W−) , (FW+ , F

U−) = β(−1

3U ,−1

2W−) .

The counterpart of the Λ flux reads

F = −6ΛDO7 + 2ΛW+ + 3ΛU , α− λ = 0 , β = 1 .10 of 14

A two U(1) model

Borchmann, Cvetič, Klevers, Mayrhofer, Palti, Piragua, Weigand

F-theory flux:

G4 =F1 ∧ σ(S1) + F2 ∧ σ(S1)

+ Λ(S20 + [K−1B ](−[K−1

B ] + S2) + S9(−S7 + S9))

Type IIB flux:(F+X , F

+Y , F

+Z ) = (F1 − F2, F1, F1 + F2),

F+X = λDO7 , (F+X , F−Y ) = α(Y+,−X−). F-th. U(1) charges: Q1 = 1

2 (QX +QY +QZ),Q2 = 1

2 (−QX + QZ) .

���1(2,0,0) 1(1,1,0) 1(1,−1,0) 1(1,0,1) 1(1,0,−1) 1(0,2,0) 1(0,1,1) 1(0,1,−1) 1(0,0,2)XX XY XY∗ XZ∗∗ XZ YY∗∗ YZ YZ∗ ZZ

11 of 14

A two U(1) model

Borchmann, Cvetič, Klevers, Mayrhofer, Palti, Piragua, Weigand

F-theory flux:

G4 =F1 ∧ σ(S1) + F2 ∧ σ(S1)

+ Λ(S20 + [K−1B ](−[K−1

B ] + S2) + S9(−S7 + S9))

flux matched byF1 = 0, F2 = Λ(−2DO7 + X+/2 + Y+/2),

λ = −2Λ, α = Λ/2.F-th. U(1) charges: Q1 = 1

2 (QX +QY +QZ),Q2 = 1

2 (−QX + QZ) .

���1(2,0,0) 1(1,1,0) 1(1,−1,0) 1(1,0,1) 1(1,0,−1) 1(0,2,0) 1(0,1,1) 1(0,1,−1) 1(0,0,2)XX XY XY∗ XZ∗∗ XZ YY∗∗ YZ YZ∗ ZZ

11 of 14

A two U(1) model

Adding an SU(3)× SU(2) top

Lin, Weigand’14’16

• A�er adding the top the model continuesto have a IIB limit.

X3 : ξ2 =s264− ws5s7 ;

instead of one, we get three conifold points.

• In addition to the fluxes along the σ(Si),there are five extra flux directions in theF-theory model.

• ...in process of matching with type IIBfluxes.

Q1 = 16 (QW + (QX + QY + QZ)),

Q2 = 13 (QW + (−QX + QZ)) .

12 of 14

(not so) exotic ma�er in the IIB limit

A singlet with U(1) charge q = 3

q = 2QX + QY

Representation q

���1(2,0)1(1,1) 31(1,−1) 11(0,2) 2

The absence of conifold points removes some ma�er representations, uponrealignment of the U(1) charges we find more exotic configurations. How doesthis extend to non-Abelian exotic ma�er?

Cvetič, Klevers, Morrison, Piragua, Raghuram, Taylor

13 of 14

Conclusions

• We have worked out the Sen limit of some MSSM models constructeddirectly in F-theory. Still the question of the limit depends on the base.

see Cody’s talk

• Generically, more flux directions in type IIB compared to F-theory.

• Some F-theory fluxes contain orientifold odd flux components.

• Generically, the demand for a smooth limit removes some ma�er from thespectrum, in which absence, charge redefinitions uncover more exoticcharged singlets.

14 of 14

Conclusions

• We have worked out the Sen limit of some MSSM models constructeddirectly in F-theory. Still the question of the limit depends on the base.

see Cody’s talk

• Generically, more flux directions in type IIB compared to F-theory.

• Some F-theory fluxes contain orientifold odd flux components.

• Generically, the demand for a smooth limit removes some ma�er from thespectrum, in which absence, charge redefinitions uncover more exoticcharged singlets.

you for your attention14 of 14