Data Center Transformation

DTS 2011Meeting Departmental and Constituent

Performance Expectations

Technology – Expectations versus Reality

• Pull in newspaper image from www.govtech.com/gt/articles/99967

Technology – Expectations versus Reality

• Pull in Newspaper article format from cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_142195219.html

Technology – Expectations versus Reality

• Pull in newspaper article from www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-airport14aug14,1,3451798,full.story

Technology – Expectations vs, Reality

• Pull in newspaper article from www.gcn.com/print/26_09/43568-1.html

Objectives

• Improve State of California’s Disaster Preparedness

• Leverage Cannery Campus move to establish an architecture for better performance

Availability – The Critical Issue

Cost versus Availability

Availability

Annual Outage

Monthly Outage

Weekly Outage Cost

95% 18.25 days 36 hours 8.4 hours Current Rates

98.5% 7.3 days 14.4 hours 3.4 hours Current Rates

99% 3.7 days 7.2 hours 1.7 hours 2x-4x

99.9% 8.8 hours 43 minutes 10 minutes 2x-4x

99.99% 53 minutes 4.3 minutes 1 minute 2x-4x

Managing for High Availability – From Eyeballs to Data

Data

Processor ApplicationWide AreaNetwork

BuildingNetwork

6 parts performing at 99% = Overall 94.1%

The Shape of the Future

• IT as a Utility– 24x “forever” expectation

• Impending mission-critical and life support applications– 500-800 online services – Health IT– Voice over IP

• Price/Performance improvements• “Green”

DTS Today…..

• Sharing only of mainframe, network backbone and some storage services

• All others are standalone customer specific solutions

• Designed for 98.5% availability for weekday primary shift and 95% for nights and weekends

DTS Today…..

• Disaster Recovery on a case-by-case basis, typically on a 72-hour recovery time (17 out of thousands of applications)

• Stand-alone application solutions make it a challenge to provide higher availability

• Architectures inhibit cost reductions

• Both computing sites in the same flood plain

Getting to 2011

UNIFIED STORAGE SERVICES

NON-MAINFRAME

DR

REMOTELY MANAGEABLEENVIRONMENT

Relocated Cannery

MAINFRAMEDR

Mainframe Disaster Recovery

• Total One-Time Cost - $17.8 million• Value

– 4 hour recovery for all applications– Recovery planning is simplified– Reduced complexity of operations

• No need for offsite tape storage

• Completion - June 2009

Unified Storage Services

• Total One-Time Cost - $29.7 million• Value

– Lower storage costs per unit, translating to eventual rate reductions

– Tiered storage levels– Simplified operation associated with

tape reductions

• Completion – December 2010

Non-Mainframe Disaster Recovery (DR)

• Total One-Time Cost - $18.5 million• Value

– Similar to mainframe – Recovery plans are simplified due to a

platform approach

• Completion – December 2010

Remote Management of Cannery

• Total One-Time Cost - $4 million• Value

– Ability to staff at <20 PYs at new facility– Better coordination of total resources

• Improved recovery response

– Eliminate the need to relocate staff

• Completion – December 2009

Relocated Cannery

• Annual Site Costs – Data Center $6.4 million– Administration $1.1 million – Existing Cannery -$4.6 million – Net Increase $2.9 million

• Value– Consolidated Staff – Computing Site in Different Disaster Region– “Green”

• Completion – December 2010

Cash Management

Projected Total  

FY Revenue Expenses Difference

07/08 $ 221,253,938 $ 225,831,446 $ (4,577,507)

08/09 $ 231,613,579 $ 238,437,341 $ (6,823,762)

09/10 $ 243,194,258 $ 244,496,349 $ (1,302,091)

10/11 $ 255,353,970 $ 248,664,320 $ 6,689,651

11/12 $ 268,121,669 $ 248,827,596 $ 19,294,073

12/13 $ 281,527,752 $ 249,034,870 $ 32,492,882

Financial Summary

• Rate considerations – Look for other funding sources

• Assumes 5% annual projected revenue growth

• Assumes 2.5% annual projected expenditure increase

Estimated Total Costs

• Total Project One-Time Costs - $170 million– Facilities Cost - $100 million amortized

over a 30 year mortgage period – Non-Facilities Total Cost - $70 million

Next Steps

• Gather input from stakeholders/customers– Customer Council

• Implement a long term vision within a project oriented process– Support from TSB, control agencies and the Legislature

• Obtain TSB approval