data-integration models (dims)

1
Data-Integration Models (DIMs) Underlying principle : Evidence should not be ignored without a very good reason Modelling Goal : to be consistent with a heterogeneous set of evidence at a level of detail which is as directly comparable to that evidence as possible In other words, to describe what is observed using a dynamic and detailed simulation model (rather than to predict or explain). Thus including kinds of data that are difficult to formalise, e.g. partial, qualitative, meso-level etc. This does not eliminate the need for independent validation, but Data-Integration Models can form a precise basis for subsequent abstraction stages or generalisation. D ata-Integration Sim ulation M odel Micro-Evidence M acro-Data AbstractSimulation M odel1 AbstractSimulation M odel2 SNA M odel Analytic M odel Data-Integration Models will be at the core of the SCID Project (Social Complexity of Immigration and Diversity) which will use these models as the start of an abstraction, analysis and evaluation process, forming a chain of related models from descriptive to abstract. See http://www.scid- project.org Bruce Edmonds, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University Advantages • To separate the processes of representation (evidence to DIM) and abstraction & generalisation (DIM to simpler model) • To have a consistent and precise integration of the evidence, maintaining the reference of details • To be a precise reference point for associated models and theories, experiments can be performed on DIM to check more abstract models (simpler simulation, statistical and analytic models) • Can be used to integrate very different kinds and levels of evidence/data e.g. narrative accounts, aggregate data, time-series data etc. Disadvantages Tend to be slow and complicated • Difficult to understand completely, need further analysis Progressive abstraction from the precise starting point of a DIM, to other kinds of models (themselves models of the DIM) Representing a variety of evidence in the DIM (micro in the agent behaviour, macro against the results) An example of a DIM in use, as part of a chain of models from evidence to abstract theories

Upload: odysseus-soto

Post on 01-Jan-2016

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Data-Integration Models (DIMs). Bruce Edmonds, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University. Underlying principle : Evidence should not be ignored without a very good reason. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data-Integration Models  (DIMs)

Data-Integration Models (DIMs)

Underlying principle : Evidence should not be ignored without a very good reason

Modelling Goal : to be consistent with a heterogeneous set of evidence at a level of detail which is as directly comparable to

that evidence as possible

In other words, to describe what is observed using a dynamic and detailed simulation model (rather than to predict or explain). Thus including kinds of data that are difficult to formalise, e.g. partial, qualitative, meso-level etc. This does not eliminate the need for independent validation, but Data-Integration Models can form a precise basis for subsequent abstraction stages or generalisation.

Data-Integration Simulation Model

Micro-Evidence Macro-Data

Abstract Simulation Model 1

Abstract Simulation Model 2

SNA Model Analytic Model

Data-Integration Models will be at the core of the SCID Project (Social Complexity of Immigration and Diversity) which will use these models as the start of an abstraction, analysis and evaluation process, forming a chain of

related models from descriptive to abstract. See http://www.scid-project.org

Bruce Edmonds, Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University

Advantages• To separate the processes of representation (evidence to DIM) and abstraction & generalisation (DIM to simpler model) • To have a consistent and precise integration of the evidence, maintaining the reference of details• To be a precise reference point for associated models and theories, experiments can be performed on DIM to check more abstract models (simpler simulation, statistical and analytic models)• Can be used to integrate very different kinds and levels of evidence/data e.g. narrative accounts, aggregate data, time-series data etc.

Disadvantages• Tend to be slow and complicated• Difficult to understand completely, need further analysis

Progressive abstraction from

the precise starting point of a DIM, to

other kinds of models (themselves models of the DIM)

Representing a variety of evidence in the DIM (micro

in the agent behaviour, macro

against the results)

An example of a DIM in use, as part of a chain of models

from evidence to

abstract theories

An example of a DIM in use, as part of a chain of models

from evidence to

abstract theories