Montclair 2010 All-Staff Meeting

A sneak peek into our students’ performance in math

Data Overview of CSAP Mathematics (Gr. 5 Focus)By: Elizabeth Szczypka

Assignment #1

Take a second to think…

• Because it’s a new school year, I want you to think back to last year….

…Think about the students that were struggling the most. Who were they? Girls? Boys? African-American? Asian?English Language Learners?

• Today we are going to look at CSAP Mathematics data that can give us a starting point into understanding which students are in need of the most help.

• Open your mind and get ready to learn!

28%

29%

25%

14%

1%3%

Montclair 5th Grade Student Population by Ethnicity

Latino/a (n=18)

African American (n=19)

White/Anglo (n=16)

African (n=9)

Native American (n=1)

Middle Eastern (n=2)

Total 5th grade students (n=65)

54%

46%

Montclair Elementary 2010 gr. 5 Gender Distribution

Males (n=35)

Females (n=30)

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

% Unsatisfactory% PartiallyProficient % Proficient

% Advanced% No Score

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

en

ts

Proficiency Level

Montclair Elementary 2010 Mathematics Gr. 5: State, District and School CSAP comparisons

State Average (n=60257)

District Average (n=5553)

School Average (n=65)

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

2008 2009 2010

Pe

rce

nt

of

Stu

de

nts

Year

Montclair Elementary Gr. 5 CSAP Mathematic Proficiency by Year (2008-2010)

 Advanced

 Proficient

Partially Proficient

Unsatisfactory

-80.00%

-60.00%

-40.00%

-20.00%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

Grade 3 2008 (n=53) Grade 4 2009 (n=53) Grade 5 2010 (n=65)

Pe

rce

nt

of

stu

de

nts

Montclair Elementary Cohort Trend Gr. 3-5 (2008-2010) CSAP Mathematics Comparison

 Advanced

 Proficient

Unsatisfactory

Partially Proficient

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

2008, gr. 3 (n=53) 2009 gr. 4 (n=53) 2010 gr. 5 (n=65)

Pe

rce

nt

of

Pro

fici

en

t St

ud

en

ts

Year and Grade Level

Montclair Elementary CSAP Mathematic Scores: Cohort Comparison of Proficient Students by Gender for the Class of 2017

Female

Male

Whole School

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient  Proficient  Advanced

Pe

rce

nt

of

Stu

de

nts

Proficiency Levels

Montclair Elementary 2010 Gr. 5 Mathematics CSAP: Males vs. Females

Male

Female

(n=35)

(n=30)

(n=7)(n=9) (n=11) (n=8)

(n=7)(n=11) (n=9)

(n=3)

-80.00%

-60.00%

-40.00%

-20.00%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

White Hispanic Black

Montclair Elementary 2010 Mathematics Gr. 5 CSAP Results by Ethnicity

% Advanced

% Proficient

% Unsatisfactory

% Partially Proficient

(n=2)

(n=9)

(n=7)

(n=2)

(n=7)

(n=4)

(n=11)

(n=3)

(n=1)

(n=7)

(n=7)

(n=5)

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Students withDisabilities

English LanguageLearners

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Pe

rce

nt

of

Stu

de

nts

Special Group

Montclair Elementary Gr. 5 2010 Mathematics CSAP: Percentage of Proficient Students by Special Groups

School (n=65)

State (n=60257)

Questions:

• Is any of this data

surprising to you?

•What piece of data has

stuck with you the most?

Why?

• Do you feel that the

results from the CSAP

scores are accurately

reflected in your

classroom? Why or why

not?

Discuss with the people at your table and be ready to share!