data statistik semester 2 eng.indd

a

STATISTICAL DATA BOOK OF RESOURCES AND EQUIPMENT OF POST AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR SEMESTER 2 OF 2012

b


i


Bismillahirrahmaanirrahim (In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful)

Alhamdulillahi rabbbil ‘alamin. [All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the Alamin (mankind, jinn and all that exists)]. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the universe who has devoted His unceasing guidance and aid so that the writing of this book can be done well.

Statistical Data Book of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester II of 2012 is the continued publication of the previous Statistical Data Book and is intended to fulfi l the need of data and information which are packaged in the form of statistics related to the Field of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology during the year 2012..

Up to this year 2012, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has entered its age of 2 years as part of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology in line with the organizational restructuring, which in other words, one can see the progress of the result of regulation and performance executed in the previous year

FOREWORD

ii


To ensure the accuracy and validity of the data presented, suffi cient time is needed for the collection, processing and analysis of the data, considering these things have to go through an approval of procedure and for data coming from the stakeholders, it is required to have data which have been declared to have been approved and may be used for the general publication which is applicable in each data source.

This Statistical Data Book of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester II of 2012 can be downloaded through the website of sdppi.kominfo.go.id or www.postel.go.id. May this Statistical Data Book of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology be useful..

Our thanks and appreciation to all the parties who have provided support and assistance in the composition of this Statistical Data Book of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester II of 2012.

However, we acknowledge with full greatness of soul that every man’s work certainly is not free from weaknesses and fl aws. Therefore, constructive criticisms and suggestions for the perfection of this book are indispensable, which can be submitted via email to [email protected].

Best Regards,Jakarta, April 2013Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology,

Muhammad Budi Setiawan

iii


Foreword iList of Contents iiiList of Tables viiList of Figures x

1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Objective of Composition 5 1.3 Method of Composition 6 1.3.1 Method of Collecting Data 6 1.3.2 Method of Presenting Data 7 1.4 Scope 8 1.5 Data Source 9 1.6 Benefi t of Composing Book 9 2 PROFILE OF DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF RESOUCES AND EQUIPMENT OF POST AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 13 2.1 Organization of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology 13 2.2 Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology 15 2.3 Technical Implementation Units (UPT) 17 2.3.1 Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing

LIST OF CONTENTS

iv


Laboratory (BBPPT) 17 2.3.2 UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring 19 2.4 Institutional Certifi cation 20

3 HUMAN RESOURCES 23 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 Number of Staff 24 3.3 Staff of UPTs of Directorate General of SDPPI 29 3.3.1 Number and Composition of Staff 29 3.3.2 Staff of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring (UPT Monfrek) 31 3.3.3 Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) 33 3.3.4 Functional Offi cials 35

4 LEGAL REGULATIONS 39 4.1 Introduction 39 4.2 Number of Legal Regulations 40 4.3 Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology 42 4.4 Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology 45

5 FREQUENCY SPECTRUM POLICY AND PLANNING 53 5.1 Scope 54 5.2 Structuring and Management of Radio Frequency Resources 55 5.2.1 Basic Principle of Radio Frequency Spectrum Structuring 58 5.2.2 Allocation of Radio Frequency Spectrum for Cellular Telecommunication Network 59 5.2.2.1 Frequency Band of CDMA 450 59 5.2.2.2 Frequency Band of CDMA 800 60 5.2.2.3 Frequency Band of GSM 900 61 5.2.2.4 Frequency Band of DCS 1800 61 5.2.2.5 Frequency Band of UMTS (WCDMA) 2100 62 5.2.3 Allocation of Frequency Spectrum of BWA 62 5.2.3.1 Frequency Band of BWA 2.3 GHz (2300-2400 MHz) 64 5.2.3.2 Frequency Band of BWA 2.4 GHz (2400-2483.5 MHz) 68 5.2.3.3 Frequency Band of BWA 3.3 GHz (3300-3400 MHz) 69 5.2.3.4 Frequency Band of BWA 5.8 GHz (5725-5825 MHz) 71 5.3 The value of License Fee (BHP) of Frequency Spectrum Band 72 5.4 Satellite Orbit Management 73 5.4.1 Management of Satellite Filing of Indonesia 74 5.4.2 Data of Indonesian Satellite 79 5.4.3 Maintenance of Indonesian Satellite Filing 80

v


5.4.4 Holding of Satellite Coordination Meeting 94 5.4.5 License for Satellite Landing Right 101

6 FREQUENCY OPERATION 105 6.1 Scope 106 6.2 Concept and Defi nition 107 6.3 Frequency Usage (ISR) 108 6.3.1 Usage Based on Frequency Band 108 6.3.2 Usage Based on Service 114 6.3.3 Usage According to Province 117 6.3.4 Pattern of Usage According to Island Regions 119 6.4 Comparison of Radio Frequency Spectrum Usage with the Number of Population and the Vastness of Area 122 6.4.1 AM Radio Frequency 122 6.4.2 FM Radio Frequency 124 6.4.3 TV Frequency 126 6.4.4 Distribution of the Use of ISR of TV and FM Canal for the Purpose of Broadcasting 128 6.4.5 GSM Frequency 132 6.5 Issuance of Radio Amateur License (IAR) and License for Inter-inhabitant Radio Communication (IKRAP) 134 6.6 Certifi cation of Radio Operator 138 6.6.1 Certifi cation of Radio Electronics and Radio Operator (REOR) 138 6.6.2 Certifi cation of Radio Operator Profi ciency (SKOR) 139

7 CONTROL OF RESOURCES AND EQUIPMENT 145 7.1 Scope of Data Presentation 146 7.2 Concept and Defi nition 147 7.3 Monitoring and Law Enforcement of Frequency and Telecommunication Equipment 149 7.3.1 Monitoring and Law Enforcement of Frequency 152 7.3.2 Report on Frequency Disturbances 157 7.4 Monitoring and Law Enforcement of Equipment 161 7.4.1 Monitoring of Telecommunication Equipment Certifi cate 161 7.4.2 Integrated Law Enforcement of Terminal Tool/Equipment of Post and Information Technology 163 7.5 Performance of UPT Frequency Monitoring 165

8 STANDARDIZATION 173 8.1 Scope 174 8.2 Concept and Defi nition 175 8.3 Certifi cate Issuance 176 8.3.1 Development of Tool and Equipment Certifi cate Issuance 176

vi


8.3.2 Certifi cate Issuance according to Group of Types of Equipment 178 8.3.3 Fluctuation of Monthly Certifi cate Issuance 181 8.3.4 Certifi cate Issuance according to Country of Origin of Equipment 183 8.3.5 Fluctuation of Monthly Certifi cate Issuance 186 8.4 Trade Balance of Telecommunication Tool and Equipment 187

9 TESTING OF TELEDOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 193 9.1 Scope 193 9.2 Concept and Defi nition 194 9.3 Statistics of Equipment Testing 195 9.3.1 Test Result Recapitulation (RHU) 195 9.3.2 Testing Result of Equipment according to Countries of Origin 196 9.3.3 Result of Equipment Testing according to Types of Equipment 198 9.3.4 Comparison between Testing Result and Issuance of Equipment Certifi cates 201 9.4 Payment Order Letter (SP2) for Testing 202 9.4.1 Number of SP2 Issuance according to Countries of Origin 202 9.4.2 Issuance of SP2 according to Countries of Origin 204 9.4.3 SP2 Issuance according to Type of Equipment 206 9.5 Calibration Testing of Tools/Equipment 208

10 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES AND EQUIPMENT OF POSTAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR 211 10.1 Scope 212 10.2 Concept and Defi nition 213 10.3 Role of Directorate General of SDPPI in State Revenue 214 10.3.1 PNBP of Frequency Sector 214 10.3.2 PNBP of Standardization Sector 216 10.3.3 PNBP from Radio Operator Certifi cation 217 10.3.3.1 PNBP from REOR and SKOR 217 10.3.3.2 PNBP from IAR and IKRAP 218 10.3.4 PNBP from Other Sources 220 10.3.5 Composition of PNBP of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Sector 221 10.4 Role of Postal and Telecommunication Industry in the National Revenue 223

vii


2.1 Certifi cation of ISO Quality for services owned by working units of Ditjen SDPPI 20 3.1 Composition of the number of staff of Ditjen SDPPI according to working unit 25 3.2 Number of Staff of Ditjen SDPPI according to Education Level in Semester 2-2012 27 3.3 Development of the number of UPT staff of Ditjen SDPPI according to Education Level 30 3.4 Number of staff of the respective UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring according to Education Level 33 3.5 Number of PPNS according to working units other than UPT Offi ce of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring (Monfrek) 343.6 Number of PPNS and Staff in the respective UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Years 2011 and 2012 35 3.7 Number of Functional Offi cials of Frequency Controller Semester 1 and 2 of 2012 36 4.1 Number of Regulations according to the fi eld and types related to SDPPI in the Year 2012 404.2 Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology issued in 2012 434.3 Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology issued in the year 2012 46

LIST OF TABLES

viii


4.4 Number of Regulations according to the fi elds and types related to SDPPI 2011 – 2012 485.1 Distribution of frequency spans according to ITU classifi cation 58 5.2A Recapitulation of the number of BTS 2G and 3G in 2011 59 5.2B Recapitulation of the number of BTS FWA in 2011 59 5.2C Recapitulation of the number of BTS Smartfren , STI and Smart in 2011 595.3 User of CDMA 450 Radio Frequency Band 605.4 Users of CDMA 800 Radio Frequency Band 60 5.5 Users of GSM 900 Radio Frequency Band 615.6 Users of DCS 1800 Radio Frequency Band 615.7 Users of UMTS 2100 Radio Frequency Band 62 5.8 Allocation of BWA 2.3 GHz Frequency Bands according to Service Zones 67 5.9 Designation of network providers at Radio Frequency Band of BWA 3.3 GHz 695.10 Total Revenues of BHP Frequency Bands in Semester 2 year 2012 735.11 Data Satellite Filing of Indonesia 75 5.12 List of Indonesian Satellites 795.13 Agenda of Coordination of Indonesian Satellites with those of Other Countries 97 5.14 License for Landing Right in Indonesia in Semester 2 Year 2012 1015.15 The above Description may be mapped as follows 1026.1 Number of Frequency Usages (ISR) Based on Frequency Bands 109 6.2 Cumulative Use of Frequency (ISR) Based on Frequency Band 110 6.3 Usage of Frequency Bands per Province in 2012 112 6.4 Number of frequency canal usages according to service in 2010 – 2012 1156.5 Frequency Usage according to Provinces, Services, and Subservices up to December 2012 (unit radio station transmitter) 1186.6 Utilization of TV Canals according to Provinces 1296.7 Utilization of FM Radio Canals according to Provinces 1316.8 Participants and Graduates of REOR in Year 2010 – 2012 1386.9 SKOR Participants and Graduates in 2010 – 2012 1407.1 Recapitulation of Monitoring Result at each UPT in 2012 150 7.2 Frequency Monitoring Result based on Services 151 7.3 Frequency Monitoring Result based on Band 1527.4 Recapitulation of Law Enforcement by each UPT in 2012 153 7.5 Composition of Law Enforcement by all UPT in 2010 – 2012 156 7.6 Frequency Disturbances found by UPT Monfrek in Semester 2 of 2012 157 7.7 Verifi cation/checking on standardization of the equipment of post and information technology 162 7.8 Level of discipline of terminal equipment usage in Broadcast Radio/TV 164

ix


7.9 Facility and infrastructure of SIMS equipment at UPT according to types of equipment 1667.10 Facility and infrastructure of SIMS equipment in UPT according to UPT 167 7.11 Condition of Resources and Work Load of the Respective UPT Frequency Monitoring in Indonesia in 2012 1688.1 Number of Certifi cate Issuance for each type in 2007 – 2012 176 8.2 Issuance of Certifi cates according to type of equipment in 2012 1788.3 Monthly certifi cate issuance according to types of certifi cates in 2011 and 2012 182 8.4 Composition of Certifi cates according to types of Certifi cates and Countries of Origin in 202 183 8.5 Distribution of monthly certifi cate issuance according to countries of origin of equipment 1878.6 Export and Import of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment in 2006 – 2012 188 9.1 Test Result Recapitulation of Telecommunication Tools/ Equipment according to Countries of Origin in 2012 1969.2 Test Result Recapitulation of Equipment according to Types of Equipment in 2012 1989.3 Number of Equipment tested according to Types of Equipment and

Countries of Origin in 2012 2009.4 Comparison between Test Result Recapitulation (RHU) and Standard Certifi cate Issuance 2029.5 Number and Value of Payment Order Letter (SP2) Handling in 2012 2029.6 Number and Value of SP2 Handling according to Countries of Origin in 2012 2059.7 Number of SP2 Issuance according to Types of Equipment and Countries of Origin in 2012 207 9.8 Number and Fee of Calibration Testing according to Types of equipment 208 10.1 The Development of PNBP from BHP Frequency In 2006 – 2012 215 10.2 The Development of PNBP of Standardization Sector years 2007 – 2012 216 10.3 PNBP from REOR and SKOR (Frequency) in 2007-2012 21810.4 PNBP from IAR and IKRAP in 2007- 2012 219 10.5 PNBP from Other Sources in 2007 – 2012 22010.6 PNBP Realization of SDPPI Sector in 2007 – 2012 (Rp. 000) 221 10.7 GDP Based on Prevailing Price in 2008 - 2012-(Billion Rp) 225 10.8 Role of Postal and Telecommunication Sector to GDP in 2008 – 2012 22710.9 The Growth Rate of GDP Sectors in Indonesia in 2007 – 2012 (%) 229

x


2.1 Organizational Structure of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology based on the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No 17/PER/M.KOMINFO/10/2010 14 2.2 Organizational Structure of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology 163.1 Composition of staff of Directorate General of SDPPI according to Working Units 26 3.2 Composition of staff of Directorate General of SDPPI according to Education Level 273.3 Composition of staff of Directorate General of SDPPI according to Level of Education and Working Unit 28 3.4 Development of the Composition of UPT Staff according to Education Level in the period of 2008 – 2012 314.1 Composition of Legal Regulation of SDPPI according to types 41 4.2 Composition of SDPPI Regulations according to work fi elds 424.3. Number of regulatory products issued since the formation of Directorate General SDPPI 495.1. National Frequency Allocation Diagram 575.2. Satellite Filing Map in Indonesia 796.1 Composition of Frequency Usage based on Frequency Band 1096.2 Distribution of Frequency Band Usage according to Big Islands 111 6.3 Composition of Frequency Usage according to Frequency Band

LIST OF FIGURES

xi


per Province 1146.4 Composition of Frequency Usage according to Service in 2010 – 2012 115 6.5 Composition of Frequency Usage according to Service and Subservice In 2012 1166.6 Use of Frequency according to Service in Sumatra Regions 1196.7 Frequency Usage according to Service in Java Regions 120 6.8 Frequency Usage according to Service in Bali, Nusa Tenggara, and Sulawesi Regions 1216.9 Frequency Usage according to Service in Kalimantan, Maluku and Papua Regions 122 6.10A Number of AM Frequency Usages in each Province 1236.10B Index of Usage Per Vastness of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for AM Frequency per Province 124 6.11A Number of FM Frequency Usages in each Province 125 6.11B Index of Usage Per Vastness of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for FM Frequency per Province 1266.12A Comparison of the Number of TV Frequency and the Number of Population and the Vastness of the Areas 127 6.12B Index of Usage Per Vastness of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for TV Frequency per Province 128 6.13 Level of Utilization of TV Frequency Canal according to Provinces 130 6.14 Level of Utilization of FM frequency canals according to Provinces 132 6.15A Comparison of the Number of GSM Frequency with the Number of Population and the Vastness of Area 133 6.15B Usage Index Per Vastness of Area (FPL) and Usage Index per Number of Population (FPP) for GSM Frequency per Province 134 6.16 Spread of the issuance of radio amateur license according to types of license and province 136 6.17 Proportion of Certifi cates issued following their types according to Big Islands 137 6.18 Distribution of radio amateur certifi cates in Big Islands of Indonesia 137 6.19 Comparison of the Level of REOR Graduation according to Organizing Towns in 2010 - 2012 139 6.20 Comparison of SKOR Graduation Level according to Organizing Town in 2010 – 2012 141 7.1A Composition of the Types of Violations in 2012 1547.1B Composition of the Types of Actions of Law Enforcement by UPT in 2012 1547.2 Comparison of Types of Frequency Violations in Semester 1 and 2 of 2012 155 7.3 Comparison of Types of Actions towards Frequency Violation In semester 1 and 2 of 2012 1557.4 Comparison of the Type of Violation and action for Law

xii


Enforcement of frequency in 2010 – 2012 156 7.5 Comparison of Frequency Disturbances Findings according to Provinces in semester 1 and 2 of 2012 158 7.6 Comparison of frequency disturbance reports according to Big Islands in semester 1 and 2 of 2012 159 7.7 Distribution of frequency disturbances according to Big Islands in 2012 160 7,8 The amount of frequency disturbances according to the type of frequency service in 2012 160 7.9 Level of discipline of certifi catge and label of tool/equipment by vendors/users 1637.10 Level of discipline of tool/equipment usage of Broadcast Radio and TV Providers 165 7.11 Composition of condition of facility and infrastructure of SIMS Equipment of UPT 166 8.1 Development of the Number of Certifi cate Issuance for each Type in 2007 – 2012 177 8.2 Composition of Certifi cates issued according to Types of Certifi cates in2007 – 2012 1788.3 Composition of Certifi cate Issuance of Equipment according to Type of Equipment 1798.4 Composition of equipment Certifi cate Issuance according to Type of Equipment and Type of Certifi cate 179 8.5 Comparison of Certifi cate Issuance of Equipment in 2010-2012 1808.6 Comparison of Certifi cate Issuance Composition according to Types of Equipment in 2010 – 2012 181 8.7 Comparison of monthly certifi cate issuance according to Types Of Certifi cates in Semester 2 of 2011 and 2012 182 8.8 Distribution of certifi cates Issued in 2012 according to Countries of Origin of Equipment 184 8.9 Proportion of Certifi cate Issuance according to Countries of Origin in 2012 (new, extension, revision) 185 8.10 Proportion of Certifi cate Issuance according to Countries of Origin in 2012 186 8.11 Growth trend of Export and Import of Telecommunication Equipment in 2006 – 2012 189 9.1 Comparison of the number of equipment tested in semester I of 2010, 2011, and 2012 196 9.2 Composition of equipment tested at BBPPT according to Countries of Origin in Semester 1 of 2012 197 9.3 Composition of equipment tested according to Types of Equipment in Semester I of 2012 199 9.4 Composition of the Number of Equipment tested according to

xiii


Type of Equipment and Countries of Origin in Semester I of 2012 201 9.5 Fluctuation of the Number and Value of Revenue from SP2 In Semester 1 of 2012 203 9.6 Comparison of SP2 Issuance per month in Semester I of 2010, 2011, and 2012 204 9.7 Composition of SP2 Issuance according to Countries of Origin in Semester I of 2012 206 9.8 Composition of SP2 Issuance according to Type of Equipment In Semester I of 2012 206 10.1 Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization of Standardization Sector 216 10.2 Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from BHP Frequency 21710.3 Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from REOR and SKOR 218 10.4 Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from IAR and IKRAP 219 10.5 Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from Other Sources 221 10.6 Proportion of PNBP realization between Sectors in PNBP of SDPPI 222 10.7 Contribution of PNBP of SDPPI Sector to State revenue 223 10.8 Contribution of Sectors to GDP with Oil and Gas in 2007 – 2011 226 10.9 Proportion of communication subsector in transportation and

communication sector in 2007 – 2012 227 10.10 Proportion of area in communication subsector in GDP in 2007-2011 228 10.11 Growth trend of telecommunication sector in GDP in 2007- 2011 230

xiv


1


1CHAPTER

2


3


1.1. Background

Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology as one of the Directorate Generals within the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology exercises four main functions in the fi eld of utilizing national resources and equipment of post and information technology. The four functions are as follows :a. Structuring function covers planning and regulation of allocation of

radio frequency spectrum and satellite orbit in order to produce quality of wireless telecommunication of international standard , capable of accommodating technological development and enhance the economic value of radio frequency spectrum resources;

b. Servicing function covers the services of radio frequency spectrum licenses both new and prolonged licenses, the services of radio operator certifi cation both new and prolonged certifi cation, the services of telecommunication tools and equipment testing and certifi cation of tols and equipment of information technology in order to conform with the defi ned technical requirements;

c. Control function covers supervision and law enforcement with regard to usage of resources of radio frequency spectrum and satellite orbit and obligation of certifi cation of information technology tools and equipment in order to conform with the defi ned technical requirements;

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1

4


d. Function of Non-Tax State Income producer where the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is a Government institution designated as producer of Non-Tax State Income on resources owned by the State managed by it through radio frequency licenses and other services related to certifi cation of radio operator and standardization of telecommunication tools and equipment comprising certifi cation and testing of telecommunication tools and equipment.

The above four functions form the spelling out of the defi ning policy function of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology whose one of the elements of his scope is utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology.

The defi ning policy function is a strategic one belonging to the Minister in the formulation of strategic basic planning and technical basic planning of national post and information technology. Hence, structuring, servicing, control, and producer of Non-Tax State Income exercised by the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology refer to the policies determined by the Minister of Communication and Information Technology. The Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology during this stage always tries its utmost to be able to implement all the policies of the Minister of Communication and Information technology in the fi eld of utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology in a good manner, so that the utilization of national resources and equipment of post and information technology may be benefi ted by people at large and is not limited only to the people living in big towns.

Up to semester 2 year 2012 (semester 2-2012), the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has entered its age of 2 years as part of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. Its performance in the management and regulation and utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology, which is separated from the provision of post and information technology, has started to be compared with the condition of its fi rst year of existence.. In other words, one could see its progress in the regulatory result and performance exercised in the previous year. This performance measurement is considered important to see the existence and eff ectiveness of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in the management and regulation in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information

5


technology. So far, the provisional aspect in the fi eld of post and information technology is more dominant compared to that of the regulation of utilization of resources and equipment itself . In fact, resources and their equipment are part and parcel of the provision in this fi eld of post and information technology. Hence, after 2 years of the existence of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology exercising the functions of structuring, management, servicing, and control of resources and equipment of post and information technology and standardization of postal and information technology equipment , its performance also need to be seen and shown to the public .

The Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is therefore supported by working units of echelon II level commensurate with duties and functions assigned to it, such as working units that handle structuring aspect, operational aspect, and controlling aspect of resources and equipment of post and information technology. Besides, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is also supported by the existence of working unit that deals with the aspect of standardization of postal and information technology equipment and Technical Implementation Units in charge of monitoring the use of radio frequency spectrum (as one of the resources of itelecommunication) and testing of telecommunication equipment..

1.2. Objective of Composition

The objective of composing this Statistical Data Book of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is as one of the input materials used by the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in determining the policy and other stakeholders may see, analyze and use the statistical data made available in this Book.

The composition of this Statistical Data Book is done following the phases of gathering, summarizing, processing and analyzing data within the scope of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. This statistical data is hoped to become a reference in the composition of data and information especially in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology and in general in the fi eld of communication and information technology.

6


1.3. Method of Composition

1.3.1. Method of Collecting DataCollecting data for the composition of Statistical Data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology of Semester 2-2012 is done through some phases. In the fi rst phase, a discussion was held to identify data to be incorporated in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology and the form of data presentation to be exposed. This phase is considered important to correctly show to the public what becomes the true coverage of resources and equipment of post and information technology and the development occurring therein. This phase is also used to select the necessary and important data to be shown to the public. In this way, through this statistical data, one may see the achievement and performance of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. The use of some alternatives of these methods in data collection is meant to optimize the process of collecting data so that the collected data can be maximized and the presentation of data is more complete. The alternative methods used in collecting data are :(a) Draft a format of a table of the data need for presentation and analysis of

the data submitted and collected from and to related working units of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology;

(b) Obtain data directly (go and collect data) from data source such as data from Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia and Central Statistics Body (BPS) and even download related information in the fi eld of radio frequency spectrum;

(c) Utilize the available data, including those that are still in the raw data format to be subsequently processed for statistical data presentation;

(d) Utilize the already published data by the relevant agency and by stakeholders such as data from BPS publication and from the internal Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology.

Based on the collected data, the same data presentation format is then composed for each data although the kinds of data obtained are diff erent. In this Statistical Data Book of Semester 2-2012, a development is also done in the exposed data by trying to select data which is not exclusively related to resources of radio frequency spectrum and equipment of post and information technology. . The development of data presentation is done by exposing the data related to the utilization of radio frequency spectrum resources, and

7


equipment of post and information technology such as demographic data (households, sub-districts) and the development of economic data.

1.3.2. Method of Presenting Data Data collected are then composed in the table either directly or through data processing in advance in the form of the same data format for statistical data presentation of the respective working units of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. Data presentation in this Statistical Data Book of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester 2-2012 is done in the form of :(1) Descriptive statistics of resources structuring, i.e. data presentation of

radio frequency spectrum structuring such as map of radio frequency spectrum allocation, economic value of radio frequency spectrum and their users, map of satellite orbit, license for satellite landing right and satellite fi lling. These data are also shown in the form of mapping diagram of the use of radio frequency spectrum by users for the respective frequency bands.

(2) Descriptive statistics of resources operation which presents data of radio frequency spectrum operation such as the use of radio frequency spectrum based on band/canal and services according to time series and between provinces (cross section). This data presentation of the use of radio frequency spectrum will also be compared with the demographic data and utilization data. to see the level of density and the level of their utilization. In this part, data is also presented having to do with the license for using radio frequency spectrum and user operators such as data of Radio Amateur License (IAR), Cetifi cation of Radio Amateur Competence (SKAR), and License for Inter-Inhabitant Radio (IKRAP) and certifi cation of Radio Electronic and Radio Operator (REOR) and certifi cation of Radio Operator Competence (SKOR).

(3) Descriptive statistics related to the control of resources and equipment of post and information technology, including data from the results of monitoring and law enforcement of the use of radio frequency spectrum and monitoring and law enforcement of the use of equipment of post and information technology.

(4) Descriptive statistics of standardization data of equipment of post and information technology, covering data of certifi cation of tools and

8


equipment of post and telecommunication and statistics of testing and calibration of telecommunication tools and equipment.

(5) Statistical composition/proportion, i.e. data presentation of proportion pf the respective variables of the existing indicators vis-à-vis the total value of indicators.

(6) Statistical trend, i.e. presentation showing the trend of the direction of the development of selected indicators, in order to show the trend on the afore-mentioned variables from time to time.

The data presentation is done in the format of frequency table and in the form of graphs/diagrams (chart), Graphs/diagrams shown in the data presentation are in the form of stick diagram, pie diagram and trend graph diagram.

1.4 Scope

In composing this Book of Statistical Data, the composing team limits the scope for internal data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology up to 31December Year 2012. The data presented cover yearly data and monthly data. The scope in the presentation of this Book of Statistical Data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology of Semester 2-2012 covers :(1) Statistics of human resources of the Directorate General of Resources

and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and of Technical Implementation Units (UPT);

(2) Statistics of legal regulations relating to the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology;

(3) Statistics of radio frequency spectrum resources structuring, including economic value of frequency and license and satellite fi lling;

(4) Statistics of operation of radio frequency spectrum resources including utilization of frequency spectrum bands by the public and certifi cation of radio operators;

(5) Statistics of the control of resources of radio frequency spectrum and equipment of post and information technology , covering monitoring and law enforcement of radio frequency spectrum and equipment of information technology;

(6) Statistics of standardization of postal and information technology equipment including certifi cation of telecommunication tools and

9


equipment;(7) Statistics of testing and calibration of telecommunication tools and

equipment; (8) Statistics of economic role of post and telecommunication.

1.5 Data Source

The data source used in the presentation of Statistical Data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester 2-2012 1 emanates from various sources that have been approved and may be used for publication purposes. The data used originates from:(1) Working Units within the scope of the Directorate General of Resources

and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (Ditjen SDPPI) such as Secretariat of Ditjen SDPPI, Directorates within the scope of Ditjen SDPPI, Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory, and Technical Implementation Units (UPT) of Monitoring Offi ce of Radio Frequency Spectrum (data up to 31 December 2012);

(2) Central Statistics Body (BPS), in the form of data already published in statistical book and data that has not been previously presented in book format;

(3) Realization of State Income and Expenditure Budget (APBN) from Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.

The presentation of Statistical Data Book of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Semester 2-2012 and data used may be downloaded in formal website of Ditjen SDPPI with the address : www.postel.go.id;

1.6 Benefi t of Composing Book

The benefi ts expected from composing this Statistical Book are::(1) Providing the most up-to-date information in the form of the data found

within the scope of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and data of stakeholders that have been composed in a systematic, clear and brief manner;

(2) Providing information to the society, so that the general public may use the Statistical Data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment

10


of Post and Information Technology for their respective need.(3) As a reference for business players in the fi eld of information technology

and communication(4) As a reliable reference for various studies regarding information

technology and communication.

11


2CHAPTER

12


13


2.1 Organization of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology

The organizational structure and work method of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology were regulated through the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No. 17/PER/M.KOMINFO/10/2010.which was defi ned on 28 October 2010 replacing the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No. 25/PER/M.KOMINFO/07/2008. The new structure, of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology comprises Secretariat General, Inspectorate General, and four Directorate Generals. The four Directorate Generals are Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (Ditjen SDPPI), Directorate General of the Provision of Post and Information Technology (Ditjen PPI), Directorate General of Information Technology Application IDitjen Aptika), Directorate General of Public Information and Communication (Ditjen IKP), and one Body, i.e. Body of Research and Development of Human Resources. Two new Directorate Generals are Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and Directorate General of the Provision of Post and Information Technology which form the splitting result of the previous Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication.

PROFILE OF DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF RESOURCES AND EQUIPMENT OF POST AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

CHAPTER 2

14


In line with the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No. 17/PER/M.KOMINFO/10/2010, the main duties of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology are to assist the President of the Republic in governmental provision of the State. The Ministry of Communication and Information Technology has duties and functions as follows:(1) Formulation, defi ning, and implementation of policies in the fi eld of

communication and information technology;(2) Managing goods or property of the State which are under the responsibility

of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology;(3) Supervision on the implementation of duties within the scope of the

Ministry of Communication and Information Technology;(4) Providing technical guidance and supervision on the implementation of

matters of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology in the regions; and

(5) Implementation of technical activities of national scope.Figure 2.1. Organizational Structure of the Ministry of Communication and Information

Technology based on the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No.17/PER/M.KOMINFO/10/2010

15


2.2. Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology

Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (Ditjen SDPPI) is one of the Directorate Generals newly formed through the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No. 17/PER/M.KOMINFO/10/2010 which is the result of splitting of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication of the previous structure. Directorate General SDPPI focuses its duties on regulation, management and control of resources and equipment of post and information technology related to the use by internal government and by the public at large/society. The area of management, facilities and regulations also focus on resources and equipment of post and information technology. Other Directorate General resulted from the splitting of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication is Directorate General of the Provision of Post and Information Technology. These two Directorate Generals have taken over most of the main duties and functions of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication in the structure of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.

Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is a working unit in the same level with 1st Echelon that exercises most of the main duties and functions of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication. The organization of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology consists of:1. Secretariat of the Directorate General;2. Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning;3. Directorate of Spectrum Licensing;4. Directorate of Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement;5. Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication

Technology Equipment;6. Technical Implementation Units, i.e.:

a. Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory;b. Offi ce of Frequency Spectrum Monitoring, comprising Main Offi ces

(Balai) and Sub-Offi ces (Shops/Loka and Post) of Frequency Spectrum Monitoring spread over 37 locations.

The Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has the duty to formulate and implement the policy and technical standardization in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology. In implementing its duty, the Directorate General of

16


Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology executes the functions of:(a) Formulating the policies in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post

and information technology;(b) Implementing the policies in the fi eld of resources and equipment of

post and information technology;(c) Drawing up norms, standards, procedures, and criteria in the fi eld of

resources and equipment of post and information technology;(d) Providing technical guidance and conducting evaluation in the fi eld of

resources and equipment of post and information technology; and(e) Implementing administration of the Directorate General of Resources

and Equipment of Post and Information Technology.

Based on the structure, main duties, and functions of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and information Technology, besides the functions of policy, regulation and guidance, the Directorate General also has the function of serving the public. This function of serving the public is carried out through the issuance of radio frequency spectrum licenses, handling claims for radio frequency spectrum disturbances, testing the competence and certifi cation of radio operators, certifi cation and testing of telecommunication tools and equipment.

Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and information Technology consists of:1. Secretariat of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of

Post and Information Technology (Setditjen SDPPI) that has the duty to

Figure 2.2. Organizational Structure of the Directorate General of Resources andEquipment of Post and Information Technology

17


implement technical and administrative services for all organizational units within the scope of Ditjen SDPPI.

2. Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning that has the duty to implement the formulation and execution of policies, drawing up norms, standards, procedures, and criteria and providing technical guidance and conducting evaluation in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning.

3. Directorate of Spectrum Licensing that has the duty to implement the formulation and execution of policies, drawing up norms, standards, procedures, and criteria, and providing technical guidance and conducting evaluation in the fi eld of spectrum licensing.

4. Directorate of Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement; that has the duty to implement the formulation and execution of policies, drawing up norms, standards, procedures, and criteria, and providing technical guidance and conducting evaluation in the fi eld of spectrum management system and law enforcement.

5. Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment, that has the duty to implement the formulation and exe4cution of policies, drawing up norms, standards, procedures, and criteria, and providing guidance and conducting evaluation in the fi eld of standardization of postal and information and communication technology quipment.

2.3. Technical Implementation Units (UPT)

2.3.1. Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT)Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory is a Technical Implementation Unit within the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology which is under and accountable to the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Administratively BBPPT is guided by Secretary of the Directorate General of SDPPI and technically operational by Director of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment of SDPPI.

In implementing its duty as stipulated in the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology No. 04/PER/M.KOMINFO/03/2011, the Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory executes its functions of:(1). drafting plan and program of BBPPT;(2). Implementing administrative services of telecommunication tools/

equipment testing;

18


(3). Implementing analysis, and evaluation of service quality system and testing of telecommunication tools/equipment;

(4). Implementing testing and maintenance of telecommunication tools/equipment, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and calibration; and

(5). Implementing administrative aff airs, fi nance, human resources and household.

In carrying out testing of telecommunication tools/equipment, the Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory refers to the Technical Specifi cation Regulation of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology,, Indonesian National Standard (SNI), and International References such as ISO, ETSI, RR, ITU, IEC. These references are used so that the Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory is capable of protecting and maintaining the quality of telecommunication tools/equipment and guaranteeing that the telecommunication tools/equipment used or prevail in Indonesia are indeed in compliance with the technical requirements.

From the development in the number of telecommunication tools and equipment prevailing in Indonesia which shows a sharp increase due to the felt need of the community, the Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory has continually developed its capability both in the infrastructure and in human resources.

To guarantee better quality of testing and the competence of laboratory, the Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory has applied Quality Management System which refers to ISO-17025:2005 and has obtained accreditation from National Accreditation Committee (KAN) LP-112-IDN.

To support the above-mentioned duties and functions, BBPPT is equipped with supporting means in the form of:(1) Testing Laboratory of Radio Equipment;(2) Testing Laboratory of Cable Based Equipment;(3) Testing Laboratory of EMC; and(4) Laboratory of Calibration.

The types of testing services provided by laboratories within BBPPT are :(1) Testing of Radio Based Telecommunication Tools/Equipment;(2) Testing of Non Radio Based Telecommunication Tools/Equipment;(3) Testing of Electromagnetic Compatibility of Telecommunication Tools/

Equipment;

19


(4) Calibration Service of Telecommunication Equipment; and(5) Telecommunication Tools Hiring Service.

2.3.2. Technical Implementation Unit of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring

The Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is an independent working unit within the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology which is accountable directly to the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. The UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is administratively guided by Secretary of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and is technically operational guided by Director of Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement of SDPPI.

The UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring has the duty to implement supervision and control in the fi eld of radio frequency spectrum usage covering activities of observation, detection of emission source, monitoring, law enforcement, evaluation and scientifi c testing, measurement, radio frequency monitoring coordination, drafting plan and program, provision of spare parts, maintenance and repair of equipment, and administrative and household aff airs.

In implementing its duty, the UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring executes its functions of :(1) Drafting plan and program, provision of spare parts, and maintenance of

radio frequency spectrum monitoring equipment;(2) Implementation of observation, detection of the source of emission

location, and monitoring of radio frequency spectrum;(3) Implementation of calibration and repair of radio frequency spectrum

monitoring equipment;(4) Implementation of administrative and household aff airs of UPT of Radio

Frequency Spectrum Monitoring;(5) Coordination of radio frequency spectrum monitoring;(6) Law enforcement and investigation of violations towards radio frequency

spectrum usage ;(7) Service/complaint of the community towards radio frequency spectrum

disturbance; and(8) Implementation of evaluation, scientifi c testing, and radio frequency

spectrum measurement.

20


The UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is classifi ed into four (4) classes, i.e.:(1) 1st Class Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Offi ce;(2) 2ndClass Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Offi ce;(3) Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Shop (Loka);(4) Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Post.

2.4 Institutional Certifi cation

Some institutional organizations within the organizational structure of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology have the functions of providing services to the public and the duties which necessitate the existence of process or procedure in exercising said duties and functions. In order to ensure a standard procedure and comply with the required standard, some organizations that provide the afore-mentioned services have also carried out the process of certifi cation of service quality of said organizations in the form of ISO certifi cation. In accordance with their duties, certifi cation of service quality in the form of this quality certifi cation is owned by the working units in providing radio frequency spectrum license service and radio frequency spectrum monitoring service and the working units which provide testing service of telecommunication tools and equipment. Most of service quality certifi cations already owned by the working units in the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology are ISO 9001 certifi cations related to service quality,.

Table 2.1 Certifi cation of ISO Quality for services owned by working units of Ditjen SDPPI

No Institution Service Certification Issuing Institution

1 Directorate of Spectrum Licensing

Radio Frequency Spectrum License

ISO 9001 : 2000 TUV-CERT

2

Office of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory

Testing of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment

ISO/IEC 17025 : 2008

Ilac-MRA-KAN

3 2nd Class Bandung Office of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring UPT

Monitoring of Radio Frequency Spectrum

ISO 9001 : 2008 Global Group (UKAS)

4 2nd Class Surabaya Office of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring UPT



5 2nd Class Denpasar Office of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring UPT



6 2nd Class Semarang Office of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring UPT



21


3CHAPTER

22


23


3.1. Introduction

Statistics in the fi eld of Human Resources illustrate the number and composition of staff in the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in all the working units thereof (Secretariat of Directorate General, Directorates and Technical Implementation Units/UPT) and staff from Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology who are assigned to work in other agencies or in other working units in the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. These statistics also illustrate the distribution of staff according to levels of education and echelon leveling to show the response from the side of staff to carry out the main tasks and functions of structuring, servicing, control, and producers of Non-Tax State Income. This situation is needed bearing in mind the very rapid development in the fi eld of management and utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology in recent years and involve many stakeholders. This book starts to compare the development of the number of staff according to working units between the condition in 2011 and the condition in 2012, since the development of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has been in existence for two years..

HUMAN RESOURCES

CHAPTER 3

24


The development in the fi eld of utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology must be followed by the capability of regulation and supported by better human resources so that said development may be commensurate with the desired direction and in line with the interest of the public. One of the elements of this set of regulations is that civil servants working in the government institution hold the function of regulator in the management and utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology in Indonesia. The condition and composition of human resources in one working unit illustrate the supra structure possessed by that working unit in carrying out its main duties and functions. Such condition and composition also refl ect the capability of service of the working unit concerned, including the working units within the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology.

3.2. Number of Staff

Up to the position of 31 December 2012, the number of staff of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is 1368 or decreased by 21 persons or 1.5% compared to the position at the end of 2011. This decline in the number of staff is related to the assignment of the available staff to other working units and the presence of staff of Directorate General of SDPPI who enter the retirement. If viewed from the comparison of the number of staff between the condition of 2011 and that of 2012, the working units which have a decline in the number of staff are UPT Monitoring Offi ce of Frequency Spectrum (Monfrek) and UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT) which respectively undergo a decline of 16 persons and 4 persons. In the meantime, staff of Directorates and staff of Secretariat of the Directorate General (Setditjen) undergo an increase.. From the aspect of the number of staff , the biggest increase is at the Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning with the number of 9 persons or an increase of 16.1% followed by Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment with an increase of 7 persons or 10.9%. The year 2012 was also marked by the decrease of the number of staff assigned to assist or work in other working units at the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology in the number of 31 persons (64.6%) to fulfi l the need of staff at the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (Ditjen SDPPI).

25


1368 staff of Directorate General of SDPPI are spread in a number of working units of Directorate General of SDPPI including the staff assigned to assist or work in other working units in the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. Staff assigned to work in other working units until the end of 2012 are, among other things, at Research and Development Centre of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (Puslitbang SDPPI), Centre of Information and Public Relations of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Centre of International Institution in the Secretariat General of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology or in other working units in the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.

From 1368 staff , the biggest proportion is in Technical Implementation Units (UPT) of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring which reaches 846 persons. The number of staff in UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is much higher than that in other working units because the Directorate General of SDPPI has 37 UPTs for monitoring radio frequency spectrum spread over 37 towns/locations in the form of monitoring offi ce, shop (loka) and post. The number of these UPTs increased from 35 in the previous year although the number of staff precisely shows a decline . Each UPT has a number of staff that varies depending on the class of such UPT, so that in total the number of staff is also big enough compared to other working units. Outside UPTs, the number of staff of the Directorate General of SDPPI is mostly found at the Secretariat of the Directorate General of SDPPI, as many as 168 staff , followed by the Directorate of Spectrum Licensing as many as 84 staff . The number of staff at the Secretariat of the Directorate General increased by 1.8% while the number of staff at the Directorate of Spectrum Licensing increased by 6.3%. However, in absolute term, the increase is lower compared to the decrease of

Table 3.1. Comparison of the number of staff of Ditjen SDPPI according to working unit

No Working Unit 2011 2012 Changes

1 Secretariat Ditjen SDPPI 165 168 +3

2 Dte Spectrum Policy & Planning 56 65 +9

3 Dte Spectrum Licensing 79 84 +5

4 DteSpect Mgt System & Law Enforcement

61 67 +6

5 Dte Standardization 64 71 +7

6 UPT Equipment Testing Office 54 50 -4

7 UPT Monitoring Office 862 846 -16

8 Staff assigned to assist/work in Ministry

48 17 -31

Total 1389 1368 -21

26


the number of staff at UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring.

The composition of staff among working units of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology including UPTs shows that the proportion of staff of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is the highest reaching 61.8%. This big proportion is from all the staff of 37 UPT radio frequency spectrum monitoring. In the meantime, the proportion of staff of Secretariat of the Directorate General of SDPPI,achieves 12.3% of the total staff , The proportion of staff among Directorates is relatively balanced enough between 4.8% and 6.1%. The smallest proportion of staff is at UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory which achieves 3.7%.

The composition of staff of the Directorate General of SDPPI according to education level shows that staff with Sarjana education level has the highest proportion of 43.3% or 563 staff . The composition of staff with education level of SLTA (Senior Secondary School) and below also has quite high proportion, achieving 34.2% of total staff or 468 staff . When compared with the previous year, the proportion of staff with Sarjana education level increases by 5.1%. On the other hand, the proportion of staff with education level of SLTA and below decreases by 4.6%. The decline also occurs on the proportion of staff with Diploma education level from 12.5% to 10.2%. or a decline of 2.3%. The combined proportion of staff with education level of Sarjana and Diploma is 53.5%. The proportion of staff with education level of magister and physician increases from 10.4% in 2011 to 12% in 2012. . The trend of changes in this composition shows that there is an eff ort to improve the quality of staff at the Directorate General of SDPPI by improving the level of education of its staff .

Figure 3.1. Composition of staff

of Directorate General of SDPPI according to

Working Units

AAssigned Staff1.2%

UPT Moni1toring Office61.8%

Secretariat of Dte Gen12.3%

UPT EquipmTesting Of

3.7%

Dte of Spectrum Policy & Planning

4.8% Dte oLi

Dte of SystemEnforc

4.9

Dte Standard

5.2%ment ffice

of Spectrum icensing6.1%

f Mgmt m & Law

ement9%

of ization

%

27


The composition of staff according to education level in the respective working units shows the number of staff with magister education level is mostly found at the Secretariat of Directorate General, the Directorate of Spectrum Licensing and at UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring. A large number of staff with magister education level in UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is because the number of working units is 37 UPTs spread across Indonesia where each UPT has staff with magister education level. Other Directorate which also has many staff with magister education level is Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning. The number of staff with Sarjana education level outside the Secretariat of the Directorate General and UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is mostly found at the Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment which achieves 41 persons, while at the Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning and Directorate of Spectrum Licensing the number of staff with Sarjana education level is relatively balanced, achieving 35-36 persons

Figure 3.2. Composition of staff of Directorate General of SDPPI according to Education Level

Table 3.2 Number of Staff of the Directorate General of SDPPI according to Education Level in Semester 2 - 2012

Doctor, 0

Diploma, 10.2%

Senior Secondar(SMU) and

below, 34.2%

0.2%

%

ry

P

Sarjana, 43.3%

Magister + Physician, 12.0%

No Working Unit S3 Magister

+ Physician

S1 Diploma SLTA and

below Total

1 Secretariat Ditjen SDPPI 1 23 69 9 66 168 2 Dte Spectrum Policy &

Planning 1 16 37 2 9 65

3 Dte Spectrum Licensing 0 21 42 7 14 84 4 Dte Spect Mgt System &

Law Enforcement 0 16 35 4 12 67

5 Dte Standardization 0 9 50 4 8 71 6 UPT Office of

Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory

0 8 21 3 18 50

7 UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring

0 57 337 111 341 846

8 Staff assigned to assist/work in Ministry of Communication and Information Technology

1 14 2 0 0 17

Total 3 164 593 140 468 1368

28


If viewed from the proportion according to education level in each working unit, the number of staff with sarjana and magister education levels is the least found at UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring and UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory. The composition of staff at UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring as seen in Figure 3.3 shows that the proportion of staff with education level of sarjana only achieves 39.8% and only 6.7% of the staff with education level of S2/S3 out of the total large enough staff of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring. Nevertheless, this proportion increases signifi cantly compared to that of the previous year where the total proportion of the staff with education level of sarjana, magister and doctoral degree was only 37%. In the meantime, at the UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory with a smaller number of staff , the proportion of staff with education level of sarjana has also achieved 42% and staff with S2/S3 education level has achieved 16%. This proportion also increases signifi cantly compared to that of 2011 where the proportion of staff with sarjana education level achieved 35% and staff with magister/doctor education level only achieved 13%.

At the same time, the proportion of staff with sarjana education level at the Directorates of Ditjen SDPPI achieves more than 50% and the proportion of staff with magister or doctoral degree education level achieves more than 20% except at the Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment. However, at the Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment, the proportion of staff with sarjana education level has achieved 70.4%, while at the Directorate of Spectrum Licensing, the proportion of staff with S2/S3 education level has achieved 25% of the total staff at said working unit.

Figure 3.3. Composition of Staff of

The Directorate General of SDPPI according to

Education Level and Working Unit

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Se

SLTA & below

Diploma

Sarjana

Magister+Physician

Doctor

ecretariat Ditgen SDPPI

Dte Spectrum Policy & Planning

39.3% 13.8%

5.4% 3.1%

41.1% 56.9%

13.7% 24.6%

0.6% 1.5%

Dte Spectrum Licensing

Dte Sy& La

Enforce

16.7% 17.9

8.3% 6.0%

50.0% 52.2

25.0% 23.9

0.0% 0.0%

stem aw ement

Dre Standardizat

ionEq

9% 11.3%

% 5.6%

2% 70.4%

9% 12.7%

% 0.0%

UPT quipment Testing Office

UPT Monitoring

Office

36.0% 40.3%

6.0% 13.1%

42.0% 39.8%

16.0% 6.7%

0.0% 0.0%

29


In the meantime, at the Secretariat of Directorate General with a total number of 168 staff (the second most after UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring), the proportion of staff with Sarjana education level has achieved 41.1%, while the proportion of staff with S2/S3 education level and physician in this working unit is only 14.3% in spite of increase compared to that of the previous year. . This also shows that there has been an eff ort of improving the quality of human resources from the side of education level.. The proportion of staff with SLTA education level and below decreases from 44.2% in 2011 to 39.3% and magister/doctor at this Secretariat of Directorate General of SDPPI also has an increase compared to the previous year, indicating the improvement of the quality of human resources from the side of education level. The proportion of staff with education level of SLTA and below decreased from 44.2% in 2011 to 39.3%. The proportion of staff with SMU/SLTA education level and below which is still high enough is found in UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring and in UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory achieving 40.3% and 36% respectively. From that composition it implicitly shows that for certain working units such as the ones related to management and radio frequency spectrum management and standardization of equipment, staff required are those with higher level of qualifi cation. Nevertheless, in general, from the composition of staff according to education level, the qualifi cation of education level of staff within the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is categorized high enough where staff with education level of sarjana and pasca sarjana achieve more than 50%.

3.3. Staff of Technical implementation Units of Directorate General of SDPPI

3.3.1. Number and Composition of Staff UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring is one of two UPTs within the scope of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. This UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring consists of 37 UPT monitoring spread over throughout Indonesia covering Monitoring Offi ces/Shops (Loka)/Posts. UPT radio frequency spectrum monitoring has the main function to conduct monitoring towards the use of frequency by various parties within the framework of regulating the utilization of frequency appropriately. This task is carried out through the existence of monitoring units in the regions in the form of offi ces, shops (loka), and posts of various levels.

30


The number of UPT staff in total (including UPT Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory) in the year 2012 follows the declining trend of staff occurring in the previous year. With the total number of staff of 896, it means decreasing by 22 staff compared to that of the previous year. As a matter of fact, during the period of 2007 – 2010 the number of staff at UPT precisely had a signifi cant increase. On the other side, a highly increasing requirement of radio frequency spectrum monitoring and equipment and the increase in the number of UPT to 37 units, have pushed the addition of monitoring staff . The same is true with the increased number of testing of equipment in line with the number and types of equipment of postal and telecommunication entering Indonesia which need to be tested, This condition requires the need of human resources to fulfi l the increasing work load. What more the telecommunication products used are also of various types and more and more reached by the society.

The decline in this number of UPT staff is estimated due to the continuation of impact of the changes in organizational structure occurring in the parent working unit which earlier was under the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication and was split into two Directorate Generals, and due to the presence of staff entering retirement while there is no addition yet of new staff for UPT.

From the side of staff composition, up to the end of 2012, there is a positive development where the proportion of staff with sarjana education level has a signifi cant increase and becomes the biggest compared to staff of other education levels and has a slight diff erence with the number of staff of SLTA education level and below. The proportion of staff with sarjana education level achieves 40% or only a diff erence of 0.1% from the proportion of staff with SLTA education level and below which earlier became the biggest. In

Table 3.3. Development

of the Number of UPT Staff of

the Directorate General of SDPPI

according to Education Level

No Year S2 S1 Diploma SLTA and below Total

1 2006 32 240 103 331 706

2 2007 27 211 101 335 674

3 2008 48 270 136 384 838

4 2009 58 290 139 396 883

5 2010 63 325 148 424 960

6 2011 51 302 151 414 918

7 2012 65 358 114 359 896

31


the previous year, the diff erence between the proportion of staff with SLTA education level and below and the staff with sarjana education level achieved 12.2%. In line with the increase in proportion of staff with sarjana education level, the proportion of UPT staff with diploma education level also decreased from 16.4% in 2011 to 12.7% in 2012. An increase also occurred in the staff with pascasarjana education level whose proportion increased from 5.6% in 2011 to 7.3% at the end of 2012.

3.3.2. Staff of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring (UPT Monfrek)Particularly for staff of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring, the distribution of the number of staff according to UPTs that spread over in 37 locations shows the variations of the number of staff among UPTs. These variations are in accordance with the classes of the UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring in the respective regions. The UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Offi ce consists of several classes, i.e. Monitoring Offi ce Class 1, Monitoring Offi ce Class 2, Monitoring Shop, and Monitoring Post, in line with the monitoring workload of the UPTs. The UPTs with big workload due to high usage of radio frequency spectrum in the regions have a higher number of staff . Four UPTs with the highest number of staff (40 persons or more) are UPTs located in Java, i.e. UPT Semarang, UPT Surabaya, UPT DKI Jakarta, and UPT Bandung. In the four above-mentioned UPTs the number of staff of sarjana education level or more is not so signifi cant. In UPT Semarang, the proportion of the total staff with sarjana education level or more actually achieves 66.5^.However, in UPT DKI Jakarta and UPT Bandung the proportion of staff with sarjana education level or more is only 36.6% and 37.5% respectively.

Figure 3.4. Development of the Composition of UPT Staff according to Education Level in the period of 2008 – 2012

SL

D

S1

S2

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

LTA & below

iploma

1

2

200845.8%

16.2%

32.2%

5.7%

200944.8%

15.7%

32.8%

6.6%

201044.2%

15.4%

33.9%

6.6%

201145.1% 4

16.4%

32.9% 4

5.6%

201240.1%

12.7%

40.0%

7.3%

32


Nevertheless, a signifi cant increase occurs in the composition of staff with sarjana and pascasarjana education levels in 2 big UPTs, i.e. UPT Jakarta and UPT Bandung which at the beginning had their proportion relatively low. Staff with sarjana and magister education levels at UPT Jakarta increased in their proportion from 23.3% in 2011 to become 36.6% at the end of 2012. Meanwhile, the proportion of staff with education level of Sarjana and magister in UPT Bandung increased from 30% in 2011 to 37.5% , while for UPT Semarang and UPT Surabaya, their proportions achieve 67.4% and 54.8% respectively.. . .

In some UPTs in the regions with the level of usage of frequency which is not so high, with social economic dynamism and the level of progress of the regions which are not so high, the number of staff of the afore-mentioned UPTs is also inclined to be not big. Four UPTs with the least number of staff (less than 10) are UPTs located in small towns, i.e. UPT Sorong, UPT Tahuna, UPT Mamuju, and UPT Manokwari. This situation is in conjunction with the workload of radio frequency monitoring which is relatively small compared to that of other UPTs Table 3.4 shows that in UPTs with the number of staff between 10 and 20, the proportion of the number of staff with Sarjana and magister education levels varies. At UPT Palangkaraya, UPT Pangkal Pinang, and UPT Kendari,, the proportion of staff with sarjana education level or more is still below 30%, even for UPT Pangkal Pinang the proportion is only 17.6%. However, in UPT Palu, the proportion of staff with sarjana and magister education levels achieves 78.9%. In the meantime, in other 3 UPTs which also have the number of staff less than 20, i.e. UPT Jayapura, UPT Bengkulu, and UPT Ternate, the proportion of staff with sarjand and magister education levels, achieves more than 55%. These three UPTs undergo a signifi cant increase as regards the number of staff with sarjana and magister education lvels because in 2011 their proportion was still less than 35%. This increase in the number of staff with sarjana and magister education levels was the eff ort of the UPTs to increase their performance in monitoring and law enforcement against frequency usage which keeps on high and complex.

33


3.3.3. Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS)In order to support the activities of monitoring, law enforcement and services provided by working units of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology, the working units concerned are supported by staff having the status of Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS). The existence of PPNS is related to one of the tasks and functions of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology to conduct supervision and law enforcement towards activities of utilizing resources and equipment of post and information technology carried out in the legal jurisdiction of Indonesia and activities carried out within the framework of performing main duties and functions of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. Particularly for UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring, the existence of PPNS also becomes important for supporting the tasks of monitoring and law enforcement of frequency and equipment carried out by UPT.

Table 3.4. Number of staff of the respective UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring according to Education Level

No UPT S2 S1 Diploma SLTA and below Total

1 UPT NAD 1 7 5 9 22

2 UPT MEDAN 0 13 1 21 37

3 UPT PADANG 0 6 3 17 26

4 UPT PEKANBARU 1 8 3 8 20

5 UPT JAMBI 2 7 7 8 24

6 UPT BABEL 1 2 5 9 17

7 UPT BATAM 3 12 4 5 24

8 UPT PALEMBANG 4 14 2 6 26

9 UPT BENGKULU 1 9 3 4 17

10 UPT LAMPUNG 3 11 1 6 21

11 UPT DKI JAKARTA 2 13 3 23 41

12 UPT BANTEN 1 15 2 9 27

13 UPT BANDUNG 2 13 2 23 40

14 UPT YOGYAKARTA 3 15 1 20 39

15 UPT SEMARANG 5 26 5 10 46

16 UPT SURABAYA 6 17 0 19 42

17 UPT DENPASAR 3 10 4 12 29

18 UPT MATARAM 0 11 5 12 28

19 UPT KUPANG 1 10 4 15 30

20 UPT SAMARINDA 2 7 3 9 21

21 UPT BALIKPAPAN 1 10 3 7 21

22 UPT PONTIANAK 2 5 5 10 22

23 UPT PALANGKARAYA 1 3 6 8 18

24 UPT BANJARMASIN 2 6 2 9 19

25 UPT MANADO 2 12 2 7 23

26 UPT PALU 2 13 0 4 19

27 UPT MAKASAR 3 17 5 10 35

28 UPT AMBON 2 5 2 6 15

29 UPT GORONTALO 0 5 6 2 13

30 UPT TERNATE 0 8 3 3 14

31 UPT KENDARI 1 3 3 8 15

32 UPT JAYAPURA 0 10 3 5 18

33 UPT MERAUKE 0 4 3 6 13

34 UPT TAHUNA 0 4 1 1 6

35 UPT SORONG 0 3 3 2 8

36 UPT MAMUJU 0 3 1 2 6

37 UPT MANOKWARI 0 0 0 4 4

Total 57 337 111 341 846

34


In total, the number of PPNS found at the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is 263 persons. This number increases by 10.5% compared to the number of PPNS in 2011. In the meantime, for PPNS at Headquarters (other than UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring), , the number of PPNS is 33 persons or an addition of 1 person compared to the number of PPNS in 2011. Among working units at Headquarters (including Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory/BBPPT) outside UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring, the number of PPNS is mostly found at UPT BBPPT, i.e. 8 persons followed by the Directorate of Spectrum Licensing and Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment having the number of PPNS of 7 persons respectively.

If compared with the number of PPNS year 2011, there is a diff erent dynamism between working units in this number of PPNS. In some working units such as Secretariat of the Directorate General, Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning, and Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment, there is a decline in the number of PPNS in 2012. In the meantime, for other working units such as Directorate of Spectrum Licensing, Directorate of Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement, and BBPPT, there is precisely an increase in the number of PPNS with diff erent numbers . Transfer of staff among working units within the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is the cause of the occurrence of the change in the number of PPNS owned by the respective working units.

In particular, UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring (Monfrek) that has one of its duties to carry out monitoring and law enforcement on frequency, in its working area also has PPNS personnel, The number of PPNS in all UPTs in 2012 achieves 232 persons or an increase of 12.6% compared to that of 2011. The number of PPNS in the respective UPTs as shown at Table 3.6 varies among UPTs and has correlation with the number of staff of said UPTs. UPTs

Table 3.5. Number of PPNS

according to working units other than

UPT Offi ce of Radio Frequency Spectrum

Monitoring (Monfrek)

No. Working Unit 2011 2012 Changes 1 Secretariat of Directorate General 9 6 -3 2 Dte of Spectrum Policy and Planning 2 0 -2 3 Dte of Spectrum Licensing 5 7 +2

4 Dte of Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement

2 5 +3

5 Dte of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment

9 7 -2

6 UPT Office of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT)

5 8 +3

Total 32 33 +1

35


with many staff as situated in the regions of Java have relatively more number of PPNS as well. The number of PPNS is mostly found at UPT Monfrek Semarang followed by UPT Monfrek Jakarta and UPT Monfrek Surabaya. This is due to the intensity of suffi ciently high usage of radio frequency spectrum at the three regions. Quite many number of PPNS is also found in other big towns with high dynamism of towns such as Medan, Yogyakarta, and Makassar. Until the end of this year 2012, all UPTs already have PPNS, including twp new UPTs, i.e. UPT Mamuju and UPT Manokwari. UPT Mamuju and UPT Sorong have each only 1 PPNS while UPT Manokwari and UPT Gorontalo have each only 2 PPNS.

Compared to the previous year, there exist UPTs that undergo an increase of the number of PPNS, but at the same time there are some UPTs that also undergo a decrease in the number of PPNS. The biggest increase in the number of PPNS occurs in UPT Palembang and UPT Semarang which have an increase of 4 PPNs respectively in 2012, followed by UPT Lampung which has an increase of 3 PPNS. On the other hand, a suffi ciently big decrease in the number of 4 PPNS occurs in UPT Pekanbaru. Some other UPTs which have each a decrease of 1 PPNS are UPT Padang, UPT Pangkal Pinang, UPT Banten, and UPT Ambon.

3.3.4. Functional Offi cialsOther than Civil Servant Investigators, at UPT Monfrek there are also functional offi cials, namely those who have the function of controlling frequency. The number of functional offi cials of frequency controller varies among UPTs Monfrek and is not directly proportional with the total number of staff of UPT Monfrek. UPT Monfrek Surabaya with the total number of 43 staff has only 5 functional offi cials of frequency controller, while UPT Bengkulu with

Table 3.6. Number of PPNS in the respective UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring years 2011 and 2012

No UPT 2011 2012 No UPT 2011 2012 1 UPT NAD 4 4 0 20 UPT Samarinda 7 9 +2 2 UPT Medan 10 10 0 21 UPT Balikpapan 4 5 +1 3 UPT Padang 5 4 -1 22 UPT Pontianak 6 6 0 4 UPT Pekanbaru 8 4 -4 23 UPT Palangkaraya 3 3 0 5 UPT Jambi 3 4 +1 24 UPT Banjarmasin 4 5 +1 6 UPT Pangkalpinang 5 4 -1 25 UPT Manado 4 4 0 7 UPT Batam 9 9 0 26 UPT Palu 6 6 0 8 UPT Palembang 5 9 +4 27 UPT Makasar 10 11 +1 9 UPT Bengkulu 4 4 0 28 UPT Ambon 4 3 -1

10 UPT Lampung 6 9 +3 29 UPT Gorontalo 2 2 0 11 UPT DKI Jakarta 12 12 0 30 UPT Ternate 2 5 +3 12 UPT Banten 6 7 -1 31 UPT Kendari 4 4 0 13 UPT Bandung 10 10 0 32 UPT Jayapura 4 5 +1 14 UPT Yogyakarta 9 11 +2 33 UPT Merauke 4 4 0 15 UPT Semarang 12 16 +4 34 UPT Tahuna 2 3 +1 16 UPT Surabaya 10 12 +2 35 UPT Sorong 1 1 0

+17 UPT Denpasar 7 9 +2 36 UPT Mamuju - 1 +1 18 UPT Mataram 6 6 0 37 UPT Manokwari - 2 +2 19 UPT Kupang 8 9 +1 38

36


only 20 staff has 7 functional offi cials of frequency controller. The highest number of functional offi cials of frequency controller is found at UPT Monfrek Semarang which has 15 persons, followed by UPT Monfrek Palembang and UPT Monfrek DKI Jakarta which have each 14 functional offi cials. Other UPTs which have suffi cient number of functional offi cials of frequency controller are UPT Makassar, UPT Yogyakarta, and UPT Batam.

Some UPTs Monfrek do not have functional offi cials of frequency controller such as , UPT Tahuna, UPT Manokwari, and UPT Mamuju. Those three UPTs Monfrek which do not have functional offi cials of frequency controller are UPTs which have the status of Monitoring Shop or Monitoring Post. Particularly for UPT Mamuju and UPT Manokwari , these two UPTs are newly formed in this year of 2012, UPT Sorong and UPT Gorontalo which in semester 1-2012 had no functional offi cials of frequency controller yet, at the end of this year 2012 they have 3 and 2 functional offi cials of frequency controller respectively.

If compared with the condition of semester 1, there is also an increase in the number of functional offi cials of frequency controller in total and per UPT. In this semester 2-2012, there is an addition of 33 functional offi cials of frequency controller compared to that of semester 1-2012 or an increase of 18%. Some UPTs that undergo an addition of functional offi cials of frequency controller in suffi ciently big number are UPT Batam, UPT Semarang, and UPT Jayapura which respectively have an addition of 5, 6 and 5 functional offi cials of frequency controller in semester 2-2012. Some other UPTs also have an addition of 3 functional offi cials of frequency controller. On the other hand, UPT Bengkulu, UPT Ternate, and UPT Merauke, have each less 1 functional offi cial of frequency controller and UPT Banjamasin has less 2 functional offi cials of frequency controller in this semester 2-2012

Table 3.7.Number of Functional Offi cials of Frequency Controller Semester 1

and 2 of 2012

No UPT Functional Controller

No UPT Functional Controller

Sem-1 Sem-2 Sem-1 Sem-2 1 UPT NAD 2 5 +3 20 UPT Samarinda 6 7 +1 2 UPT Medan 7 8 +1 21 UPT Balikpapan 6 6 0 3 UPT Padang 3 6 +3 22 UPT Pontianak 4 7 +3 4 UPT Pekanbaru 3 3 0 23 UPT Palangkaraya 5 7 +2 5 UPT Jambi 7 8 +1 24 UPT Banjarmasin 4 2 -2 6 UPT Pangkalpinang 6 3 -3 25 UPT Manado 1 1 0 7 UPT Batam 5 10 +5 26 UPT Palu 5 6 +1 8 UPT Palembang 11 14 +3 27 UPT Makasar 13 13 0 9 UPT Bengkulu 8 7 -1 28 UPT Ambon 5 5 0

10 UPT Lampung 6 6 0 29 UPT Gorontalo 0 2 +2 11 UPT DKI Jakarta 12 14 +2 30 UPT Ternate 3 2 -1 12 UPT Banten 6 6 0 31 UPT Kendari 3 3 0 13 UPT Bandung 9 9 0 32 UPT Jayapura 2 7 +5 14 UPT Yogyakarta 13 13 0 33 UPT Merauke 4 3 -1 15 UPT Semarang 9 15 +6 34 UPT Tahuna 0 0 0 16 UPT Surabaya 5 5 0 35 UPT Sorong 0 3 +3 17 UPT Denpasar 4 4 0 36 UPT Mamuju 0 0 0 18 UPT Mataram 2 2 0 37 UPT Manokwari 0 0 0 19 UPT Kupang 5 5 0

37


4CHAPTER

38


39


4.1 Introduction

Statistics of legal regulations illustrate the number of legal regulations initiated by the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology as regulator in the fi eld of management and utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology by issuing a set of legal regulations in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology. This regulation function is carried out by initiating until issuing legal regulations in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology starting from Laws of the Republic of Indonesia up to Ministerial Decrees or Decisions. These legal regulations refl ect the policies of the Government to be used as reference for stakeholders of industry and other stakeholders in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology.. The set of regulations issued in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology forms an action of the Government in implementing the functions of regulating, supervising, and controlling. The fast development in the fi eld of communication and information technology demands the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, in particular the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology, to always anticipate its arrangements by making preparations of a set of appropriate legal regulations.

LEGAL REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 4

40


The set of legal regulations issued to regulate, supervise and control operation in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology covers regulations in the form of Laws, Government Regulations, Presidential Decrees, Ministerial Decrees, Ministerial Decisions, Decrees of the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and Circulars of the Minister. In the last fi ve years, many regulations have been issued, particularly of technical nature.

4.2. Number of Legal Regulations

Within the period of two years of the new institution, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology, until the end of the 2012, has initiated the issuance of 41 regulations or in total since the formation of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has initiated the issuance of 73 regulations in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology. From 41 regulations issued, the highest level is still in the form of Presidential Decree. There is no regulation yet in the level of Law or Government Regulation related to the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology issued after two years of the formation of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. Until the end of the year 2012, out of 41 regulations issued, 26 are in the form of Ministerial Decrees, 14 are in the form of Ministerial Decisions, and 1 in the form of Presidential Decree.

Seen from their composition, the biggest number of regulations lies in the form of Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology the proportion of which achieves 63.4%. of the total regulations issued. Regulations in the form of Ministerial Decisions achieve a proportion of 34.1% of the total regulations issued. Until the end of this year 2012, no

Table 4.1. Number of Regulations according to the fi eld and types

related to SDPPI in the Year 2012

Types of Regulations

Spectrum Policy & Planning

SDPPI

Spectrum Licensing

SDPPI

Mgt System & Law Enforcement

SDPPI

Standardization SDPPI Other TOTAL

Law 0 0 0 0 0 0 Government Regulation 0 0 0 0 0 0

Presidential Decree 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ministerial Decree 5 2 0 19 0 26

Ministerial Decision 13 1 0 0 0 14

Decree of Director General SDPPI

0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 18 3 0 19 1 41

41


Decrees of the Director General of SDPPI have been issued, while in the year 2011, 13 Decrees of the Director General of SDPPI were issued having the nature of technical regulations.. This is due to the fact that based on Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 Year 2011 on Establishment of Legal Regulations, technical provision of regulatory nature is composed in the form of Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology.

The composition of regulations issued in the year 2012 according to the work fi elds as seen in Figure 4.2 shows that most of the regulations issued are in the fi eld of standardization of postal and information and communication technology equipment and in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning. This composition is a bit diff erent from that of the regulations issued during the year 2011 where the proportion of regulations in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning was the biggest although in this year of 2012 the proportion of regulations in the fi eld of standardization of postal and information and communication technology equipment is a bit more compared to that of regulations in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning . The proportion of regulations issued in the fi eld of standardization of postal and information and communication technology equipment achieves 46.3% of the total regulations issued, particularly in the form of Ministerial Decrees, while the proportion of regulations in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning achieves 43.9% of the total regulations issued. The high proportions in these two fi elds are in line with the types of regulations issued, where Ministerial Decrees and Ministerial Decisions in the regulations of these two fi elds (standardization of postal and information and communication technology equipment and spectrum policy and planning) are more technical in nature regarding regulations on spectrum policy and planning and on defi ning of standardization of telecommunication tools and equipment.

Figure 4.1. Composition of Legal Regulations of SDPPI according to types

Decrees Dirgen

SDPPI, 0.0

Laws 0.0

Ministerial Decisions,

34.1%

of n 0%

0% Govt. Regulations

0.0%

s

MinisteDecrees,

%

PresidenDecre

2.4%

erial 63.4

ntial es

%

42


4.3. Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology

Until the end of the year 2012, 26 Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology related to Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology have been issued. The greater part (73%) of these Ministerial Decrees is related to the fi eld of standardization of postal and information and communication technology equipment, Only fi ve Ministerial Decrees are related to the fi eld of Spectrum Policy and Planning and two Ministerial Decrees are related to the fi eld of Spectrum Licensing. The Ministerial Decrees related to Standardization are mostly concerning technical requirements of telecommunication tools and equipment and concerning guideline for the implementation of designation of Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory. Both of them are related to the duties of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology in the fi elds of testing and determination of standards of postal an information technology equipment to be used in Indonesia. In the meantime, the Ministerial Decree related to Spectrum Licensing concerns certifi cation of radio operator profi ciency/competence. Majority of the Ministerial Decrees in the fi eld of Spectrum Policy and Planning are related to the procedure of coordination of telecommunication provision and radio frequency band usage.

Figure 4.2. Composition of SDPPI Regulations according

to work fi elds

Stanon oInfoTecEq

4

ndardizati of Postal & o & Comm chnology uipment 46.3%

Other,2.

Spectrumpolicy anplannin43.9%

.4%

m nd g

%

SpecLicen

7.3

ctrum nsing 3%

Spectrum MgSystem & LawEnforcement

0.0%

gt w t,

43


Table 4.2. Decrees of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology issued in 2012

No Ministerial Decree Field

1 Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 04/PER/M.KOMINFO/01/2012 on Technical Requirements of Ethernet First Mile Equipment.

Standardization

2

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 06/PER/M.KOMINFO/02/2012 on Technical Requirements of Internet Protocol Multiplexer Equipment.

Standardization

3 Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 07/PER/M.KOMINFO/03/2012 on Technical Requirements of Contactless Smart Card

Standardization

4 Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 08/PER/M.KOMINFO/03/2012 on Procedure of Implementing Post Market Surveillance

Standardization

5

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 11/PERE/M.KOMINFO/04/2012 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Equipment of Coarse Wavelength Digital Multiplexer

Standardization

6

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 14/PER/M.KOMINFO/05/2012 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Equipment of Dense-Wavelength Digital Multiplexer

Standardization

7

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 15 Year 2012 on Guide for the Implementation of Designation of Domestic Test Office of Telecommunication Equipment

Standardization

8

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 16 Year 2012 on Guide for the Implementation of Recognition of a Test Office of Telecommunication Equipment of a Foreign Country

Standardization

9

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2012 on Guideline for the Implementation of Tariffs on Non-Tax State Income Emanating From License Fee of Telecommunication

Spectrum Licensing

10 Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 20 Year 2012 on Certification of Radio Operator Proficiency/Competence

Spectrum Licensing

11

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 22 Year 2012 on Use of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band of Ultra High Frequency at Service Zone IV, Service Zone V, Service Zone VI, Service Zone VII, and Service Zone XV for the Purpose of Transition of Terrestrial Digital Broadcast Television

Spectrum Policy and Planning

12

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 24 Year 2012 on Amendment to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 11/PER/M.KOMINFO/04/2008 on

Standardization

44


No Ministerial Decree Field Service Quality Standard of Basic Telephone Service of Local Fixed Network

13

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 25 Year 2012 on Service Quality Standard of Basic Telephone Service of Long Distance Direct Dialling Fixed Network

Standardization

14

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 26 Year 2012 on Service Quality Standard of Basic Telephone Service of International Connection Fixed Network

Standardization

15

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 27 Year 2012 on Service Quality Standard of Basic Telephone Service of Fixed Network With Limited Mobility

Standardization

16

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 28 Year 2012 on Amendment to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 12/PER/M.KOMINFO/04/2008 on Service Quality Standard of Basic Telephone Service of Cellular Mobile Network

Standardization

17

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 29 Year 2012 on Coordination Procedure of the Use of Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Need of Neutral Technology Based Wireless Broadband Service


18

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 30 Year 2012 on Coordination Procedure Between Telecommunication Provider That Applies Personal Communication System 1900 and Telecommunication Provider That Applies Universal Mobile Telecommunication System


19

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 31 Year 2012 on Second Amendment to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 01/PER/M.KOMINFO/1/2006 on Structuring of Radio Frequency Band of 2.1 GHz For the Provision of IMT-2000 Cellular Mobile Network


20

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 32 Year 2012 on Second Amendment to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 07/PER/M.KOMINFO/2/2006 on Provision of the Use of Radio Frequency Band of 2.1 GHz for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network


45


4.4 Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology

Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology are regulations which are more technical in nature regarding the defi ning of a policy related to the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology. Until the end of the year 2012, fourteen Ministerial Decisions have been issued related to resources and equipment of post and information technology. This number shows an increase of Ministerial Decisions issued in semester 2 because in semester 1 only fi ve Ministerial Decisions were issued related to the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology. Since the nature is defi ning a policy of technical

No Ministerial Decree Field

21

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 33 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Equipment of Multi-Layer Switch

Standardization

22

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 34 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Short Range Devices (SRD)

Standardization

23

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 35 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Tools and Equipment of Standard Based Digital Broadcast Television Receiver (Set Top Box) of Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial – Second Generation (DVB-T2)

Standardization

24

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 36 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Tools and Equipment of Standard Based Digital Broadcast Television Transmitter of Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial – Second Generation (DVB-T2)

Standardization

25

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 37 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Tools and Equipment of Studio Transmitter Link for the Need of Broadcast Radio

Standardization

26

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 43 Year 2012 on Procedure of Selection of Users of Additional Radio Frequency Band at Radio Frequency Band of 2.1 GHz for the Provision of IMT-2000 Cellular Mobile Network

Spectrum Licensing

27

Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 44 Year 2012 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Equipment of Broadband Over Power Line Modem for the Need of Customers

Standardization

46


in nature, Ministerial Decisions issued are also mostly in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning. These Ministerial Decisions in the fi eld of spectrum policy and planning are the greater part in the form of fi xing a value for the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum. Out of fourteen Ministerial Decisions issued, thirteen of them are related to the fi eld of Spectrum Policy and Planning of radio frequency spectrum and only one is related to Spectrum Licensing of radio frequency spectrum. On the whole, the Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology in the fi eld of resources and equipment of post and information technology issued during the year 2012 are shown in table 4.3. .

Table 4.3. Decisions of the Minister of Communication and Information

Technology issued in the year 2012

No. Ministerial Decision Field

1

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 47/KEP/M.KOMINFO/01/2012 on Fixation of Bank Indonesia Rate for the Calculation of License Fee of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band of 2.1 GHz for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network year 2012

Spectrum Licensing

2

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 50/KEP/M.KOMINFO/01/2012 on Second Amendment to the Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 237/KEP/M.KOMINFO/07/2009 on Determination of Selection Winners of the Provision of Packet-Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Purpose of Wireless Broadband Service.


3

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 51/KEP/M.KOMINFO/01/2012 on Third Amendment to the Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 264/KEP/M.KOMINFO/08/2009 on Designation of the Block of Radio Frequency Band and Mechanism for Payment of the License Fee of Radio Frequency Spectrum to Selection Winners of the Provision of Packet-Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Purpose of Wireless Broadband Service..


4

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 325KEP/M.KOMINFO/05/2012 on Third Amendment to the Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 237/KEP/M.KOMINFO/07/2009 on Determining the Selection Winners of the Provision of Packet-Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for Purpose of Wireless Broadband Service.


5

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 326KEP/M.KOMINFO/05/2012 on Fourth Amendment to the Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 264/KEP/M.KOMINFO/08/2009 on Designation of the Block of Radio Frequency Band and Mechanism for Payment of the License Fee of Radio Frequency Spectrum to Selection Winners of the Provision of Packet-Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Purpose of Wireless Broadband Service...


6

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 490 Year 2012 on Fixing the Value (N x K) and Number of Population on Calculation of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz, 900 MHz, and 1800 MHz and the Provision of Wireless Local Fixed Network with Limited Mobility at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz.


47


Decrees of the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology are no more included in the statistical data of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in this year of 2012. In the year 2012, the regulations in the form of Decrees of the Director General are destined for regulations of internal purposes within the scope of the Directorate General, while regulations which concern external purposes are in the form of Ministerial Decrees. Based on this criterion, the statistical data of Decrees of the Director General are no more included in the statistical data book.

No. Ministerial Decision Field

7

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 491 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz of PT Telekomunikasi Selular.


8

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 492 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz of PT. XL Axiata, Tbk.


9

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 493 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz and the Provision of Wireless Local Fixed Network with Limited Mobility at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz of PT. Indosat, Tbk.


10

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 494 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Wireless Local Fixed Network With Limited Mobility at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz of Bakrie Telecom, Tbk.


11

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 495 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Wireless Local Fixed Network with Limited Mobility at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz of PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk.


12

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 496 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 1800 MHz of PT. Axis Telekom Indonesia.


13

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 497 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network at Radio Frequency Band of 1800 MHz of PT. Hutchinson CP Telecommunications.


14

Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 762 Year 2012 on Fixing the Amount and Time for Payment of the License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Third Year for the License of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band for the Provision of Cellular Mobile Network and the Provision of Wireless Local Fixed Network with Limited Mobility at Radio Frequency Band of 800 MHz of PT. Smartfren Telecom, Tbk.


48


Since the formation of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology which is a splitting of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication, in total 73 regulations have been issued. Out of said number, the highest level of regulation is still a Decree of the President of the Republic of Indonesia which is only one regulation. From the types of regulations, those mostly issued are of the type of Ministerial Decrees with the proportion of 45.2% followed by Ministerial Decisions with the proportion of 35.6%.In semester 2-2012, more Ministerial Decrees in the fi eld of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information technology were issued so that their proportion is bigger than that of Ministerial Decisions . In semester 1-2012, more Ministerial Decisions in the fi eld of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology were issued compared to the issuance of Ministerial Decrees, while regulations in the form of Decrees of the Director General were only 13 in number or their proportion was only 17.8% (issued in the year 2011).

From the aspect of related fi elds, regulations of resources and equipment of post and information technology issued until the end of 2012 are mostly related to Spectrum Policy and Planning of radio frequency spectrum and regulations related to the fi eld of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment of telecommunication tools and equipment. The proportions of regulations already issued in these two fi elds achieve 42.5% and 39.7% respectively. Meanwhile the proportion of regulations related to the fi eld of Spectrum Licensing achieves only 6.8% of the total regulations issued since the formation of the institution of Directorate General of SDPPI.

Table 4.4. Number of Regulations according to the fi elds and types

related to SDPPI 2011 - 2012

*) Issued only in 2011

Types of Regulations


SDPPI

Spectrum Licensing

SDPPI

Spectrum Management System and Law Enforcement

SDPPI

Standardization SDPPI Other Total

Law 0 0 0 0 0 0

Government Regulation 0 0 0 0 0 0

Presidential Decree 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ministerial Decree 7 2 1 21 2 33

Ministerial Decision 24 1 0 0 1 26

Decree of Dirgen SDPPI*) 0 2 0 8 3 13

Total 31 5 1 29 7 73

49


Figure 4.3. Number of regulatory products issued since the formation of Directorate General SDPPI

Law

Gove

Pres

Mini

Mini

Decr

Tota

ernment Regulat

sidential Decree

isterial Decree

isterial Decision

ree of Dirgen SD

al

1

1

2

2

3

3

Spectrum & Plann

0

tion 0

0

7

24

DPPI 0

31

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Policy ning

SpeLice

ectrum ensing

SpeSysEn

0

0

0

2

1

2

5

ectrum Mgmt stem & Law

nforcement

S

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

Standardization of SDPPI

0

0

0

21

0

8

29

Other

0

0

1

2

1

3

7

50


51


5CHAPTER

52


53


Radio frequency spectrum and satellite orbit are scarce natural resources. The use of these natural resources need to be managed and regulated so that their utilization could be optimally obtained by taking into account national and international legal norms such as constitution and convention to International Telecommunication Union and Radio Regulations.

The use of radio frequency spectrum must be in line with its objective of usage and must not disturb one another, bearing in mind that the nature of radio frequency spectrum may propagate to every direction without recognizing the border of geographical area or political area (border of district/municipality, border of province, and even the border of state). With the increasing development of technology, utilization of the available radio frequency spectrum resources shows the interest in the increasingly high usage and more diverse utilization of the frequency. Radio frequency is used in almost all fi elds such as telecommunication, broadcasting, need of supporting industry, shipping, defense, air or sea transportation. The use of frequency for telecommunication and data communication is the fastest in its development particularly for wireless telecommunication and internet, because of its widespread usage by all strata of the society. The large market of cellular telecommunication and internet users in all classes of the society causes the interest of industry (cellular operators and data/internet connection services)

FREQUENCY SPECTRUM POLICY

CHAPTER 5

AND PLANNING

54


to become high in the usage of frequency. This also has implication on the economic value of the frequency which is also becoming high. Therefore, regulation of frequency spectrum policy and planning is necessary to make the utilization better, avoiding overlapping, resulting in a better quality of usage. This frequency spectrum policy and planning is also meant to optimize the economic value of frequency resources which is increasingly high for the interest of developing telecommunication sector in Indonesia.Utilization of satellite orbit resources must also be regulated in such a way in order to make the operational management of the satellite well regulated. Satellite orbit is defi ned as the pathway in the outer space crossed by a satellite. As to the defi nition of satellite (artifi cial), it is an object that circulates in the outer space and turns around the earth, which has a function as radio station that receives and emits or reemits and or receives, processes, and reemits radio communication signal.

5.1. Scope

Statistical data of Frequency Spectrum Policy and Planning presented the data related to the management of resources, particularly radio frequency and satellite orbit.

Overall, the scope of statistical data presentation of this Frequency Spectrum Policy and Planning includes:A. Structuring and Management of Frequency Resources

1) Basic Principles of Frequency Spectrum Policy and Planning2) Allocation of Radio Frequency Band for Cellular Telecommunication

Network which is divided based on the following technologies: • CDMA 450 • CDMA 800 • GSM 900 • GSM 1800 • UMTS (WCDMA) 2100

3) Allocation of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) Frequency Spectrum, which is divided into:

• BWA Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz • BWA Frequency Band of 2.4 GHz • BWA Frequency Band of 3.3 GHz • BWA Frequency Band of 5.8 GHz

55


B. Value of License Fee (Biaya Hak Penggunaan - BHP) of frequency spectrum band:

C. Management of Satellite Resources1) Satellite Landing Right License2) Satellite Filling Recapitulation3) Comment on ITU Filling Publication4) Organizing Satellite Coordination Meeting with Telecommunication

Administrations of ITU Member Countries in Indonesia.

5.2 Structuring and Management of Radio Frequency Resources

In this modern life, Radio Frequency Spectrum is used in almost all aspects of life including telecommunication, broadcasting, internet, transportation, defense and security, government, health, agriculture, industry, banking, tourism, etc. Hence, Radio Frequency Spectrum as limited natural resources provides strategic and economic impact on the welfare of the society of a country. The progress of a country particularly in the fi eld of telecommunication (ICT) nowadays will highly be determined by the eff ective and effi cient management of radio frequency spectrum. The management of radio frequency spectrum which is eff ective, effi cient and orderly utilized will have a very positive impact on the development of every country, including Indonesia.

Frequency spectrum as limited resources must be managed eff ectively and effi ciently. This effi cient management of frequency is conducted through various strategies and steps, such as:1. Planning of radio frequency spectrum usage which is dynamic and

adaptive to the needs of the society and technological development.2. Frequency spectrum management which is systemic and supported by

accurate and up-to-date frequency spectrum information system.3. Consistent and eff ective supervision and control of frequency spectrum

usage.4. Anticipative regulations that provide assurance.5. Strong frequency spectrum management institution, supported by

professional human resources and adequate procedure and means of frequency spectrum management.

The present mapping of radio frequency spectrum usage and the future planning that have been determined in the form of table of allocation of

56


radio frequency spectrum of Indonesia (TASFRI). As an improvement of the Decision of the Minister of Communication Number 5 Year 2001, a Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 29/PWER/M.KOMINFO/07/2009 has been issued on Table of Allocation of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Indonesia (TASFRI). The diagram of national frequency allocation is illustrated in the following fi gure

57


Figure 5.1.National Frequency Allocation Diagram

(Sou

rce:

Fre

quen

cy A

lloca

tion

, Pol

icy

and

Plan

ning

of

Spec

trum

of

Indo

nesi

a, D

enny

Set

iaw

an, 2

010)

.

58


5.2.1. Basic Principle of Radio Frequency Spectrum StructuringThe principle of radio frequency spectrum management is practised by considering the following aspects:• Comprehensive, systemic and integrated frequency spectrum management.• Applied internationally as regulated under Radio Regulations.• Developed in supranational regulations.• Capable of accommodating future demand.• Oriented to the welfare of the society based on national need and

follow the development of technology (which is always developing and sustainable).

ITU classifi es the radio frequency spectrum continuously from frequency of 3 Hz up to 3000 GHz and divides them into 13 spans of frequency bands as follows:

Table of allocation of Radio Frequency Spectrum of Indonesia currently in force (Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 29 Year 2009) has been synchronized with the provision in the document of Radio Regulations Year 2008 and Final Act-World Radio Communication Conference Year 2007 (WRC 2007), by taking into account also the types of their use in Indonesia, and the new planning drafted more effi ciently by taking cognizance of the technological development. The above-mentioned Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology has been amended twice, i.e. through the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 40 Year 2009 and the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 25 Year 2010.

Table 5.1. Distribution of

frequency spans according to ITU

classifi cation

Band Name Abbreviation ITU Band Frequency Wave Length

< 3 Hz > 100,000 km

Extremely low frequency ELF 1 3–30 Hz 100,000 km – 10,000 km

Super low frequency SLF 2 30–300 Hz 10,000 km – 1000 km

Ultra low frequency ULF 3 300–3000 Hz 1000 km – 100 km

Very low frequency VLF 4 3–30 kHz 100 km – 10 km

Low frequency LF 5 30–300 kHz 10 km – 1 km

Medium frequency MF 6 300–3000 kHz 1 km – 100 m

High frequency HF 7 3–30 MHz 100 m – 10 m

Very high frequency VHF 8 30–300 MHz 10 m – 1 m

Ultra high frequency UHF 9 300–3000 MHz 1 m – 100 mm

Super high frequency SHF 10 3–30 GHz 100 mm – 10 mm

Extremely high frequency EHF 11 30–300 GHz 10 mm – 1 mm

Above 300 GHz < 1 mm

59


5.2.2. Allocation of Radio Frequency Spectrum for Cellular Telecommunication Network

The cellular telecommunication network is known by the general public from its services. As an example, GSM technology is more recognized with its 2G service, and UMTS technology (WCDMA) is identical with 3G service. The following Table shows the spread of Base Transceiver Station (BTS) per operator in a number of provinces in Indonesia.

Meanwhile, the number of BTS of telecommunication providers with limited mobility (Fixed Wireless Access/FWA) at band of 800 MHz in Indonesia in 2011 is as shown in Table 5.2B below.

As regards CDMA 450 technology used by PT. Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia (STI), CDMA 800 by PT. Smartfren Telecom (Smartfren), and PCS1900 by PT. Smart Telecom (Smart), they are spread in 16 provinces with the number of BTS as shown in Table 5.2C below :

5.2.2.1. Frequency Band of CDMA 450In line with the footnote of Table of Radio Frequency Spectrum Allocation of Indonesia (TASFRI)INS12, radio frequency band of 450-457.5 MHz in pair with 460-467.5 MHz is allocated for the provision of cellular mobile telecommunication. Since the cellular technology used at said radio frequency band is Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), the radio frequency band is often called CDMA 450 frequency band. Currently, the license for the use of CDMA 450 radio frequency

Table 5.2A. Recapitulation of the number of BTS 2G and 3G in 2011

Table 5.2B. Recapitulation of the number of BTS FWA in 2011

Table 5.2C. Recapitulation of the number of BTS Smartfren, STI, and Smart in 2011

OPERATOR BTS 2G Number of Provinces BTS 3G Number of

Provinces TELKOMSEL 32,268 33 9,509 33

INDOSAT 15,816 33 3,437 19 XL 23,374 33 4,910 28

HCPT 11,813 25 3,700 21 AXIS 5,054 13 1,515 14

OPERATOR BTS FWA Number of Provinces BTEL (Esia) 3,994 29 TELKOM (Flexi) 5,716 33 INDOSAT (StarOne) 1,574 24 SMARTFREN 1,273 13

OPERATOR BTS Number of Provinces SMARTFREN 2,342 16 STI 561 16 SMART 2,203 16

60


band is assigned only to one cellular mobile network telecommunication provider, i.e. PT Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia (STI) with national service area.

5.2.2.2. Frequency Band of CDMA 800In line with the footnote of TASFRIINS15, radio frequency band of 824 - 845 MHz in pair with 869 - 890 MHz is allocated for the provision of cellular mobile network telecommunication and provision of telecommunication with limited mobility (Fixed Wireless Access/FWA). Since at said frequency band of 824 – 845 MHz in pair with 869 – 890 MHz Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology is applied, both as cellular mobile service and as Fixed Wireless Access (FWA), the frequency band in question is often called by the name of CDMA 800 frequency band.

The operators (telecommunication providers) that obtain license for the use of CDMA 800 radio frequency band are PT. Bakrie Telecom (BTEL), PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. (Telkom), PT. Smartfren Telecom (Smartfren, formerly called PT. Mobile-8 Telecom), and PT. Indosat, Tbk.

Table 5.3. User of CDMA 450

Radio Frequency Band.

Table 5.4. Users of CDMA 800 Radio Frequency Band

Frequency Band (MHz) Operator License Period

450 – 457.5 (UL) / 460 – 467.5 (DL) PT Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia 5 years for every Radio

Station License (ISR) UL = Uplink; DL = Downlink


DKI JAKARTA, BANTEN, AND WEST JAVA REGIONS 824.265 – 829.185 (UL)/ 869.265 – 874.185 (DL) BTEL 2010 - 2020

830.415 – 834.105 (UL) / 875.415 – 879.105 (DL) Telkom 2010 – 2020

OUTSIDE DKI JAKARTA, BANTEN, AND WEST JAVA REGIONS 824.265 – 829.185 (UL)/ 869.265 – 874.185 (DL) Telkom 2010 – 2020

830.415 – 834.105 (UL) / 875.415 – 879.105 (DL) BTEL 2010 - 2020

NATIONAL

835.905 – 840.825 (UL) / 880.905 – 885.825 (DL) Smartfren

2010-2020, except for Riau Islands Province which is still in the form of ISR so that its validity period follows that of ISR, i.e. 5 years since its issuance

842.055 – 844.515 (UL)/ 887.055 – 889.515 (DL) Indosat

2010-2020, except for Riau Islands Province which is still in the form of ISR so that its validity period follows that of ISR, i.e. 5 years since its issuance

UL = Uplink; DL = Downlink

61


5.2.2.3. Frequency Band of GSM 900In line with the footnote of TASFRIINS16, radio frequency band of 890-915 MHz in pair with 935-960 MHz is allocated for the provision of cellular mobile telecommunication and identifi ed for IMT. Since at said radio frequency band of 890-915 MHz in pair with 935-960 MHz Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) technology is applied , the frequency band in question is often called by the name of GSM 900 frequency band.

The operators ( telecommunicat ion providers) that obtain license for the use of GSM 900 radio frequency band are PT. Indosat, Tbk., PT. Telekomunikasi Selular (Telkomsel), and PT. XL Axiata, Tbk (XL) with national service area.

5.2.2.4. Frequency Band of DCS 1800In the footnote of TASFRIINS19 it is stated that radio frequency band of 1710-1785 MHz in pair with 1805-1880 MHz is allocated for the provision of cellular mobile telecommunication and identifi ed for IMT. Since at said radio frequency band of 1710-1785 MHz in pair with 1805-1880 MHz Digital Cellular Service (DCS) technology is applied, the frequency band in question is often called by the name of DCS 1800 frequency band. The operators (telecommunication providers) that obtain license for the use of DCS 1800 radio frequency band are PT. Indosat,

Tbk., PT. Telekomunikasi Selular (Telkomsel), PT. XL Axiata, Tbk. (XL), PT. Axis Telecom Indonesia (AXIS, formerly called PT. Natrindo Telepon Seluler), and PT. Hutchinson CP Telecommunications (HCPT), covering national service area.

Table 5.5. Users of GSM 900 Radio Frequency Band


890 – 900 (UL)/ 935 – 945 (DL) Indosat 2010 -2020

900 – 907.5 (UL)/ 945 – 952.5 (DL) Telkomsel 2010 -2020

907.5 – 915 (UL)/ 952.5 – 960 (DL) XL 2010 -2020


Tabel 5.6. Pengguna Pita Frekuensi Radio Frekuensi DCS 1800


1710 – 1717.5 (UL) / 1805 – 1812.5 (DL) XL 2010-2020

1717.5 – 1722.5 (UL / 1812.5 – 1817.5 (DL) Indosat 2010-2020

1722.5 – 1730 (UL) / 1817.5 – 1825 (DL) Telkomsel 2010-2020

1730 – 1745 (UL) / 1825 – 1840 (DL) Axis 2010-2020

1745 – 1750 (UL) 1840 – 1845 (DL) Telkomsel 2010-2020

1750 – 1765 (UL) / 1845 – 1860 (DL) Indosat 2010-2020

1765 – 1775 (UL) / 1860 – 1870 (DL) Telkomsel 2010-2020

1775 – 1785 (UL) / 1870 – 1880 (DL) HCPT 2010-2020


62


5.2.2.5. Frequency Band of UMTS (WCDMA) 2100According to the footnote of TASFRIINS21, frequency bands of 1885-1980 MHz, 2010-2025 MHz and 2110-2170 MHz are the core bands of IMT-2000 application as a form of cellular mobile telecommunication service, while in particular, frequency band span of 1920 - 1980 MHz in pair with frequency band of 2110 - 2170 MHz forms a pair of frequency band used for cellular service with Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS) technology or generally known also as Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) technology. Hence, radio frequency band of 1920-1980 MHz in pair with 2110 – 2170 MHz is called UMTS 2100 frequency band or WCDMA 2100 frequency band..

The same as the condition at frequency band of DCS 1800, operators (telecommunication providers) that obtain license for using UMTS 2100 radio frequency band are also fi ve operators that operate at DCS 1800 band, i.e. PT. Indosat, Tbk., PT. Telekomunikasi Selular (Telkomsel), PT. XL Axiata, Tbk. (XL), PT. Axis Telekom Indonesia (Axis, formerly known as PT. Natrindo Telepon Seluler), and PT. Hutchinson CP Telecommunications (HCPT), covering national service area.

5.2.3. Allocation of Frequency Spectrum of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA)

In general, Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) is described as data communication which may off er data/internet access of high speed, and capable of providing anytime and anywhere service using wireless media.

Table 5.7. Users of UMTS 2100

Radio Frequency Band


1920 – 1925 (UL) / 2110 – 2115 (DL) HCPT 2006 – 2016

1925– 1930 (UL) / 2115 – 2120 (DL) AXIS 2011 – 2021

1930 – 1935 (UL) / 2120 – 2125 (DL) AXIS 2006 – 2016

1935 – 1940 (UL) / 2125 – 2130 (DL) Telkomsel 2009 – 2019

1940 – 1945 (UL) / 2130 – 2135 (DL) Telkomsel 2006 – 2016

1945 – 1950 (UL) / 2135 – 2140 (DL) HCPT 2011 – 2021

1950 – 1955 (UL) / 2140 – 2145 (DL) Indosat 2006 – 2016

1955 – 1960 (UL) / 2145 – 2150 (DL) Indosat 2009 – 2019

1960 – 1965 (UL) / 2150 – 2155 (DL) XL 2006 – 2016

1965 – 1970 (UL) / 2155 – 2160 (DL) XL 2010 – 2020


63


Since the term BWA is actually limited in wireless broadband usage for the need of access only and does not cover backbone and backhaul, the Government then uses a more general term namely Wireless Broadband Service. Bearing in mind that the term BWA is commonly used, then in this writing the term BWA is constantly used with the understanding that wireless broadband service is not limited only for the need of access, but also for the need of backbone and backhaul.

BWA service is closely linked to high speed internet access. As regards the defi nition of speed of communication, BWA varies from 200 kbps up to 100 Mbps. Currently, the government has defi ned the limit of minimum transmission speed of BWA service through the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 7 Year 2009 on Structuring of Radio Frequency Band For the Need of Wireless Broadband namely 256 kbps. However, in line with technological demand, the limit of such speed is continuously studied in order to be increased..

The main aims of the Government policy within the framework of telecommunication provision for wireless broadband service are :a. To add alternatives in the eff ort to catch up the lag behind of ICT

teledensity and spread of service evenly to all regions of Indonesia within a relatively short period .

b. To stimulate the availability of internet access tariff reachable in Indonesia.

c. To open the opportunity of the rise of domestic manufacturing industry, application and contents.

d. To motivate optimization and effi ciency of radio frequency spectrum usage.

Allocation of spectrum for Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) in general can be grouped into two sections, namely :• Planning of frequency band defi ned based on international radio

regulations by ITU meeting such as IMT (International Mobile Telecommunication);

• Planning of frequency band defi ned through IEEE standard and non-standardized (proprietary) frequency band which has not been decided as ITU standard.

Infrastructure of access network which is especially categorized as BWA in Indonesia has a number of frequency band allocations :

64


a. Exclusive, i.e. 300 MHz (287-294 MHz, 310-324 MHz), 1.5 GHz (1428-1452 MHz and 1498-1522 MHz), 2 GHz (2053-2083 MHz), 2.3 GHz (2300-2400 MHz), 2.5/2.6 GHz (2500-2520 MHz and 2670-2690 MHz), 3.3 GHz (3300-3400 MHz), and 10.5 GHz (10150-10300 MHz and 10500-10650 MHz).

b. Non-exclusive is the frequency band of 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz.

In the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number: 07/PER/M.KOMINFO/01/2009 on Structuring of Radio Frequency Band For The Need of Wireless Broadband Service, it has been decided that the license for the use of frequency bands of 300 MHz, 1.5 GHz, 2 GHz, 2.3 GHz, 3.3 GHz and 10.5 GHz which earlier have been based on Radio Station License (ISR) will gradually be changed into the license of Radio Frequency Spectrum Band (IPSFR), while for the frequency bands of 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz, the license for their frequency usage is based on class license

The discussion below concerns the development of the policy of the Government and its implementation in regulating BWA at bands of 2.3 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 3.3 GHz, and 5.8 GHz.

5.2.3.1. Frequency Band of BWA 2.3 GHz (2300 – 2400 MHz)The legal bases related to the use of this BWA 2.3 GHz frequency band are as follows 1) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology

Number 8 Year 2009 on Defi ning Frequency Band for the Need of Wireless Broadband Service at Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz;

2) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2011 on Use of Radio Frequency Band of 2.3. GHz for the Need of Wireless Broadband Service Based on Neutral Technology;

3) Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 237 Year 2009 on Determining the Selection Winner of the provision of Packet Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Need of Wireless Broadband Service as amended latest by the Decrision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 325 Year 2012;

4) Decision of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 264 Year 2009 on Defi ning the Block of Radio Frequency Band and Mechanism for the Payment of License Fee (BHP) of Radio Frequency Spectrum for Selection Winner of the Provision of Packet Switched Based Local Fixed Network Using Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz For the Need of Wireless Broadband Service, as amended latest by the Decision

65


of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 326 Year 2012;

5) Decree of the Director General of Post and Telecommunication Number 94 Year 2008 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Subscriber Station Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) Nomadic at Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz;

6) Decree of the Director General of Post and Telecommunication Number 95 Year 2008 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Base Station Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) Nomadic At Frequency Band of 2.3. GHz;

7) Decree of the Director General of Post and Telecommunication Number 96 Year 2008 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Antenna of Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) Nomadic At Frequency Band of 2.3. GHz;

8) Decree of the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Number 213 Year 2011 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Subscriber Station For the Need of Neutral Technology Based Wireless Broadband Service at Radio Frequency Band of 2.3. GHz;

9) Decree of the Director General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Number 214 Year 2011 on Technical Requirements of Telecommunication Tools and Equipment of Base Station and Antenna For the Need of Neutral Technology Based Wireless Broadband Service at Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz.

The Government has conducted selection of the provision of BWA telecommunication at frequency band of 2.3. GHz the Selection Document of which is defi ned through the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 22 Year 2009.

The determination of the license for BWA 2.3 GHZ frequency band usage is divided into Service Zones spread over a number of 15 Service Zones from the west end to the east end of Indonesia. Sumatra Island Regions are divided into four Service Zones, Java Island is divided into four Service Zones, Bali Island and Nusa Tenggara islands into one Service Zone, Kalimantan Island into two Service Zones, Sulawesi Island into two Service Zones, Papua, Maluku, and North Maluku Regions cover two Service Zones. Taking into account the economic potential and other considerations specifi c in each Service Zone, the Reserve Price determined by the Government for the auction of BWA 2.3 GHz is also diff erent between zones.

66


Entering the phase of post auction, it is evident that there are two providers that do not pay the License Fee (BHP) of radio frequency band pursuant to their commitment when submitting an off er in the selection process. The two providers are :(1) Consortium of PT. Comtronics Systems and PT. Adiwarta Perdania which

later agree to submit themselves only as PT. Comtronics Systems (for Zones 5, 6, and 7), and

(2) PT. Rahajasa Media Internet on behalf of Consortium Wimax Indonesia which later forms a new business entity by the name of PT. Wireless Telecom Universal (for Zone 15).

Lastly, PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. (Telkom) submits its withdrawal in four Service Zones which were earlier won at selection in the year 2009, i.e. Zones 6, 7, 9, and Zone 12. Telkom currently has only an allocation of 1 block of frequency band at Zone 10.

As a consequence of withdrawal of three providers in question, currently there are three Service Zones whose BWA 2.3 GHz frequency bands are not utilized, namely Zone 6 (Central Part of Java), Zone 7 (Eastern Part of Java), and Zone 9 (Papua). There are also Service Zones that are utilized only part of them, i.e. Zone 5 (Western Part of Java except Bogor, Depok, Bekasi), Zone 10 (Maluku and North Maluku), Zone 12 (Northern Part of Sulawesi), and Zone 15 (Riau Islands). The allocation of BWA 2.3 GHz frequency bands according to Service Zones is shown in Table 5.8

67


In line with the increasing speed of technological development, particularly bearing in mind that usage and utilization of radio frequency spectrum must prioritize the aspects of effi ciency, conformance with the objective, and benefi t to the society, the Government provides freedom for BWA providers to be able to use other wireless broadband technology outside the defi ned technical provision.

In view of the above, the Government issues a Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2011 on Usage of Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Need of Neutral Technology Based Wireless Broadband Service. Other impact that also need to be regulated by the Government is adjustment of mechanism and the amount of the License

Table 5.8. Allocation of BWA 2.3 GHZ Frequency Bands according to Service Zones

SERVICE ZONES SELECTION WINNER FREQUENCY (MHz) Zone 1 Northern Part of Sumatra

PT. Firstmedia Tbk 2360 - 2375 PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2375 – 2390

Zone 2 Central Part of Sumatra

PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2360 – 2375


Zone 3 Southern Part of Sumatra


PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2375 – 2390 Zone 4 Banten, Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi

PT. Firstmedia Tbk 2360 – 2375

PT. Internux 2375 – 2390

Zone 5 Western Part of Java except Bogor, Depok, and Bekasi

(PT. Comtronics Systems revoked). 2360 – 2375

PT. Indosat Mega Media 2375 – 2390

Zone 6 Central Part of Java

(PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk revoked) 2360 – 2375 (PT. Comtronics Systems revoked). 2375 – 2390

Zone 7 Eastern Part of Java

(PT. Comtronics Systems revoked). 2360 – 2375

(PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk revoked) 2375 – 2390

Zone 8 Bali and Nusa Tenggara

PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2360 – 2375 PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2375 – 2390

Zone 9 Papua

(PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk revoked) 2360 – 2375 (PT. Wireless Telecom Universal revoked) 2375 – 2390

Zone 10 Maluku and North Maluku

PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk 2360 – 2375 (PT. Wireless Telecom Universal revoked) 2375 – 2390

Zone 11 Southern Part of Sulawesi


Zone 12 Northern Part of Sulawesi

(PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk revoked) 2360 – 2375 PT. Jasnita Telekomindo 2375 – 2390

Zone 13 Western Part of Kalimantan


SERVICE ZONES SELECTION WINNER FREQUENCY (MHz)

Zone 14 Eastern Part of Kalimantan


Zone 15 Riau Islands

PT. Berca Hardayaperkasa 2360 – 2375 ..(PT. Wireless Telecom Universal revoked) 2375 – 2390

68


Fee (BHP) of radio frequency band which shall be paid by the selection winners that use other technology.

In relation to the possibility of using two or more BWA technologies at adjacent frequency bands between providers, the Government later issues a Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 29 Year 2012 on Coordination Procedure of the Use of Radio Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz for the Need of Neutral Technology Based Wireless Broadband Service. As regards matters laid down in the procedure, these, among other things, are:1. 6 conditions of interference that might occur in the provision of neutral

technology based BWA service at band of 2.3 GHz 2. Mechanism of coordination is provided for each condition, among other

things, covering regulation : technical parameters, coordination distance, and guardband.

3. In the event that coordination between providers has been done, but problems of interference occurring have not been solved yet, then frequency users may submit application to the Government to fi nd solution to said problems.

5.2.3.2. Frequency Band of BWA 2.4 GHz (2400 – 2483.5 MHz)The Government has decided through the issuance of a Decree of the Minister or Communication Number 2 Year 2005 that radio frequency band of 2400 – 2483.5 MHz may be used for the need of data access and/or internet access. The radio frequency band of 2400 – 2483.5 MHz is used in sharing of the time domain, and/or technology in a harmonious manner between users by constantly taking into account the principle of non disturbance.

The technical requirements that shall be adhered to by each user of frequency band of 2400 – 2483.5 MHz are as follows :a. Maximum Eff ective Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) for outdoor usage

at the amount of 4 Watt (36.02 dBmW) and for indoor usage at the amount of 500 milliWatt (27 dBmW);

b. Emission power of equipment (TX power) is maximum 100 mW; andc. Out of band emission is maximum -20 dBc per 100 kHz.

Since the license for usage of this BWA 2.4 GHz frequency band is based on class license, so in its operation in the fi eld, tools and/or equipment of telecommunication used shall have certifi cate in accordance with the prevailing provision. This forms the precondition that shall be fulfi lled by each user of BWA 2.4 GHz frequency band.

69


5.2.3.3. Frequency Band of BWA 3.3 GHz (3300 – 3400 MHz)Allocation of frequency band for Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) 3.3 GHz lies at the span of frequency band of 3300 – 3400 MHz. This span of frequency band of BWA 3.3 GHz of 100 MHz wide is divided into eight blocks each having the width of 12.5 MHz. BWA Service at frequency band of 3.3 GHz in Indonesia is also divided into 15 Service Zones.

From the total of 15 Service Zones and eight blocks of frequency, there are currently eight network provider companies that own the license for radio frequency usage at band of 2.1 GHz, namely (1) PT. Jasnikom Gemanusa, (2) PT. Aplikanusa Lintasarta, (3) PT. Indosat Mega Media, (4) PT. Starcom Solusindo, (5) PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, (6) PT. Rabik Bangun Pertiwi, (7) PT. Rekajasa Akses, and (8) PT. PT Citra Sari Makmur.

The distribution of network providers for BWA 3.3 GHz based on Service Zones and their frequency blocks is shown in table 5.9.

Table 5.9. Designation of network providers at Radio Frequency Band of BWA 3.3 GHz

Broadband Wireless Service Zone Frequency Block (MHz)

3300 - 3312.5

3312.5 - 3325

3325 - 3337.5

3337.5 – 3350

3350 - 3362.5

3362.5 -3375

3375 - 3387.5

3387.5 - 3400

Zone 1 Northern Part of

Sumatra - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT 5 - PT 8

Zone 2 Central Part of

Sumatra - - PT 2 PT 3 - PT 5 - -

Zone 3 Southern Part of

Sumatra - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT 5 - -

Zone 4 Banten and

Jabodetabek - PT 1 PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT 5 PT 7 PT 8

Zone 5 West Java minus

Botabek - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT 5 PT 7 PT 8

Zone 6 Central Part of Java - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 - - PT 8

Zone 7 Eastern Part of Java - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 - - PT 8

Zone 8 Bali and Nusa

Tenggara - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT6 - PT 8

Zone 9 Papua - - PT 2 - - - - -

Zone 10 Maluku & North

Maluku - - PT 2 - - - - -

Zone 11 Southern Part of

Sulawesi - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 - - -

Zone 12 Northern Part of

Sulawesi - - PT 2 PT 3 - - -

Zone 13 Western Part of Kalimantan

- - PT 2 - PT 4 PT5 - -

Zone 14 Eastern Part of Kalimantan

- - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 PT5 - -

Zone 15 Riau Islands - - PT 2 PT 3 PT 4 - - -

Note: PT1: PT. Jasnikom Gemanusa PT5: PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia PT2: PT. Aplikanusa Lintasarta PT6: PT. Rabik Bangun Pertiwi PT3: PT. Indosat Mega Media PT7: PT. Rekajasa Akses PT4: PT. Starcom Solusindo PT8: PT. Citra Sari Makmur

70


In the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 9 Year 2009, it was defi ned that the existing users of frequency band of 3.3 GHz and the existing users of radio frequency band of 3.5 GHz that migrate to frequency band of 3.3. GHz shall adjust the use of their frequency band in accordance with the provision of the period of two (2) years counting from 19 January 2009. In the course of the period, various constraints were found in the process of migration from the band of 3.5 GHz to the frequency band of 3.3 GHz.

In view of the above, the Government held meeting with providers of BWA band of 3.3 GHz and amendment was made to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 9 Year 2009 through the issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 35 Year 2009. In that Decree it is stipulated that the time limit of migration is extended to two (2) years counting from 19 August 2009 and ends on 19 August 2011.

Within the above period PT. Aplikanusa Lintasartha submitted its constraints faced in the process of migration, i.e. the existence of the case of interference with TVRO service found at band of 3.4 – 3.7 GHz in some locations in the eastern coast of Sumatra Island as a consequence of the existence of LNB equipment owned by the community that works outside the standard specifi cation so that interference occurred in the case of receiving satellite broadcast on the part of the community particularly those that are near the base station of PT.. Aplikanusa Lintasartha.

Besides the problem with TVRO, in quarter IV of 2012, it was found out that there were other cases which became the constraints in the process of migration from 3.5 GHz to 3.3 GHz , among other things :1. Lack of compatibility between BWA 3.3 GHz TKDN equipment (domestic

component of equipment) required and the existing equipment of 3.5 GHz frequency which need to be replaced;

BWA 3.3 GHz TKDN has an IP ‘technology while BWA 3.5 GHz may use TDM technology. As a consequence of the incompatibility of such technology, it is necessary to fi nd ways to carrying TDM traffi c (serial interface) through IP network.

2. Allocation of frequency canal at 3.3. GHz which is small and capability of polarization of equipment so that the capacity of BTS becomes little.

Some BWA providers have more frequency allocation at frequency allocation of 3.5 GHz compared to that of 3.3 GHz and the availability of 3.5 GHz

71


equipment which capable of dual polarization where 3.3 GHZ equipment is only capable of single polarization. The impact of this problem is the need of acquisition of location to add new BTSs to anticipate the shortage of capacity. Any acquisition of location need suffi ciently long time besides creating the need of more fi nancing and investment.

The Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology understands the constraints faced by some operators of BWA 3.3 GHz in carrying out migration of frequency band usage from 3.5 GHz to 3.3 GHz. Nevertheless, based on the result of the study undertaken on legal aspect and also the decision of the plenary meeting of the Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI), the time limit of migration of BWA 3.3 frequency band will not be extended and second amendment will not be made to the Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 09/PER/M.KOMINFO/01/2009 on Defi ning the Radio Frequency Band For the Need of Wireless Broadband Service At Radio Frequency Band of 3.3 GHz And Migration of Users of the Existing Radio Frequency Band for the Need of Wireless Broadband Service From Radio Frequency Band of 3.4 – 3.6 GHz to Radio Frequency Band of 3.3 GHz.

5.2.3.4. Frequency Band of BWA 5.8 GHz (5725 – 5825 MHz)The Government has defi ned the regulation concerning the frequency band of BWA 5.8 through a Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 27 Year 2009 that radio frequency band of 5.8 GHz at radio frequency span of 5725 – 5825 MHz assigned for the need of wireless broadband service with TDD mode. Some of the provisions written in the above Decree are as follows :a. Sharing usage at the time, region, and/or technology in a harmonious

manner between users;b. It is forbidden to create harmful interference;c. Does not obtain protection;d. Telecommunication tools/equipment to be used at radio frequency

band of 5.8 GHz for the need of wireless broadband service shall have certifi cates of tools/equipment in accordance with the prevailing legal regulations.

The technical provisions regarding the use of radio frequency band of 5.8 GHz for the need of wireless broadband service are as follows :a. Each user of radio frequency band of 5.8 GHz is confi ned in his/her usage

of bandwidth of maximum 20 MHz;

72


b. Each user of radio frequency band of 5.8 GHz is confi ned in the usage of his/her emission power in line with the following applications :;:1) P-to-P (Point-to-Point) Application:

(i) Maximum mean of EIRP: 36 dBm. (ii) Maximum mean of EIRP density: 23 dBm / MHz.

2) P-to-MP (Point-to-Multipoint) Application: (i) Maximum mean of EIRP: 36 dBm. (ii) Maximum mean of EIRP density: 23 dBm / MHz.

3) Mesh Application (i) Maximum mean of EIRP: 33 dBm (ii) Maximum mean of EIRP density: 20 dBm / MHz.

4) AP-MP (Any point-to-multipoint) Application: (i) Maximum mean of EIRP: 33 dBm. (ii) Maximum mean of EIRP density: 20 dBm / MHz. 5.3. The value of License Fee (BHP) of Frequency Spectrum Band

In the cellular, 3G and BWA frequency band usage, there are six frequency bands that have been defi ned and given permission for the use of those frequency bands or already in the form of License for Radio Frequency Spectrum Band. Those six cellular frequency bands are (1) Frequency Band of 800 MHz, (2) Frequency Band of 900 MHz, (3) Frequency Band of 1800 MHz, (4) Frequency Band of 2.1 GHz, (5) Frequency Band of 2.3 GHz, and (6) Frequency Band of 3.3 GHz. Particularly for frequency band of 2.1 GHz which is 3G frequency, its use is diff erentiated for two allocations, i.e. fi rst carrier allocation and second carrier allocation. Each of those frequency bands has bandwidth for certain usage and the grant of license also has implication on the application of License Fee (BHP) to the operators using that frequency band. One allocation of frequency band may be used by a number of cellular operators in line with the number of available bandwidths.

Application of the License Fee (BHP) of radio frequency by the Central Government towards usage of radio frequency spectrum by users is based on the prevailing legal regulations as follows :1) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Year 1997 on Non-Tax State

Income (PNBP);2) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 Year 1999 on

Telecommunication;

73


3) Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 53 Year 2000 on Use of Radio Frequency Spectrum and Satellite Orbit;

4). Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 Year 2005 applicable at the Department of Communication and Information Technology;

5) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 13 Year 2005 juncto (in conjunction with) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 37 Year 2006 on Telecommunication Provision Using Satellite;

6) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 17 Year 2005 on Procedure of Radio Frequency Licensing;

7) Decree of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 Year 2005 on Guideline for the Implementation of PNBP Tariff s of BHP of radio frequency spectrum;

8) Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 Year 2009 on Types and Tariff s of the Kinds of Non-Tax State Income Applicable at the Department of Communication and Information Technology.

Any user of radio frequency spectrum shall pay BHP of radio frequency spectrum in advance for the usage period of one year . All the BHP revenues of radio frequency are deposited to the State Treasury as Non-Tax State Income (PNBP).

The following Table shows the Total Number of BHP Revenues of Frequency Bands in Semester II Year 2012

5.4. Satellite Orbit Management

Orbit slot and satellite radio frequency spectrum are limited natural resources that cannot be owned by any country. Orbit slot is used to place a satellite in the orbit. The orbit slot usage in the outer space is regulated by International Telecommunication Union (ITU).

Table 5.10 Total Revenues of BHP Frequency Bands in Semester II Year 2012

Note: Data of Main IPSFR Revenues of semester 2 year 2012 (excluding fi ne).

No Frequency Band Revenue (Rp)

1 3G 987.427.847.432

2 2G 4.891.914.217.361

3 BWA 2,3 GHz 191.222.000.000

TOTAL 6.070.564.064.793

74


Based on ITU Radio Regulations, there are two groups of frequency bands for satellite, i.e. Unplanned Band and Planned Band. Unplanned Band is frequency band for satellite that cannot be claimed the ownership of a country only and its usage is regulated by ITU with a view to ensuring the equality of access and orbit slot usage for all countries. Every orbit slot usage (satellite radio frequency spectrum) must be registered (fi ling) to ITU. The procedure of registration of satellite network to ITU is Advanced Publication,, Coordination, Administrative Due Diligence, and Notifi cation.

Planned Band is frequency band for satellite that has been regulated in such a way by ITU so that each country obtains orbit slot allotment, satellite transponder frequency canal with the coverage limited to territorial area of the country. There are two types of Planned Band namely Broadcasting Satellite Service (BSS) Plan (Appendix 30 and Appendix 30A) and Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) Plan (Appendix 30B).

5.4.1 Management of Satellite Filing of IndonesiaThe Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has also issued satellite fi ling for companies for their own satellites for their business need in telecommunication sector and information technology. Until December 2012, 40 satellite fi ling of Indonesia have been registered and have been submitted for registration to ITU. The fi ling of Indonesia consists of 37 fi ling of unplanned band and 3 fi ling of planned band.

In detail, the list of fi ling of Indonesia that have been registered to ITU are as follows:

75


Table 5.11. Data Satellite Filing of Idonesia

No

Orb

it S

lot

Sate

llite

Fili

ng

Ope

rato

r Fr

eque

ncy

Filin

g St

atus

at I

TU

Band

U

plin

k (M

Hz)

D

ownl

ink

(MH

z)

1 10

6 C

SM-1

06

CSM

C B

and

Ext C

Ban

d Ku

Ban

d Ka

Ban

d

5850

-665

0 27

500-

3100

0 13

710-

1443

0

3400

-419

0 17

700-

2120

0 11

020-

1270

0 A

PI/A

2 10

7.7

IND

OST

AR-

1 M

CI

S ba

nd

X b

and

Ext C

ban

d

8120

- 82

70

5862

.25

– 59

67.2

5 25

20 -

2670

36

58.7

5 –

3700

.25

PART

II-S

3 10

7.7

IND

OST

AR-

107.

7E

MC

I S

band

X

ban

d C

ban

d

8120

- 82

70

5862

- 59

66

2520

- 26

70

3658

- 37

00

RES4

9

4 10

7.7

IND

OST

AR-

107.

7E-K

M

CI

Ku b

and

1375

0 - 1

3997

10

962

- 114

53

RES4

9

5 10

7.7

IND

OST

AR-

1A

MC

I S

band

X

ban

d 81

20 -

8270

2520

- 26

70

RE

S49

6 10

8 PA

LAPA

-B1

TELK

OM

C

ban

d 59

25-6

425

3700

-420

0 PA

RT II

-S

7 10

8 PA

LAPA

-B1-

EC

TELK

OM

Ex

t C b

and

6427

-672

3 34

02-3

698

PART

II-S

8 10

8 PA

LAPA

-C2

TELK

OM

C

ban

d 59

25-6

425

3700

-420

0 PA

RT II

-S

9 10

8 TE

LKO

M-1

08E

TELK

OM

C b

and

Ext C

ban

d Ku

ban

d Ka

ban

d

5850

-672

5 79

00-8

400

1375

0-14

000

1400

0-14

500

2475

0-25

250

2700

0-27

500

2750

0-29

500

2950

0-31

000

3400

-420

0 72

50-7

750

1095

0-11

200

1145

0-11

700

1170

0-12

200

1220

0-12

750

1770

0-19

700

1970

0-25

250

CR/

E

10

108.

2 IN

DO

STA

R-11

0E

MC

I S

band

X

ban

d C

ban

d

8120

- 82

70

5862

.75

– 59

66.7

5 25

20 -

2670

36

59.1

5 –

3699

.85

CR/

D

11

108.

2 IN

DO

STA

R-11

0E-K

M

CI

Ku b

and

1375

0 - 1

4000

10

962

- 114

53

CR/

E

76


No

Orb

it S

lot

Sate

llite

Fili

ng

Ope

rato

r Fr

eque

ncy

Filin

g St

atus

at I

TU

Band

U

plin

k (M

Hz)

D

ownl

ink

(MH

z)

12

111

CSM

-111

C

SM

C B

and

Ku B

and

Ka B

and

5850

-665

0 27

500-

3100

0 13

710-

1443

0

3400

-419

0 17

700-

2120

0 11

020-

1270

0 A

PI/A

13

113

PALA

PA-B

2 IN

DO

SAT

C B

and

5927

– 6

423

3702

– 4

198

CR/

C

14

113

PALA

PA-C

1 IN

DO

SAT

C b

and

Ext C

ban

d Ku

ban

d Ex

t Ku

band

5927

- 64

23

6427

- 66

63

1425

4 - 1

4486

13

754

- 139

86

3702

- 41

98

3402

- 36

38

1145

4 - 1

1686

10

954

- 111

86

PART

II-S

15

113

PALA

PA-C

1-B

IND

OSA

T C

Ban

d Ku

Ban

d Ka

Ban

d

5850

-670

0 13

750-

1450

0 27

500-

3100

0

3400

-420

0 10

950-

1170

0 12

200-

1275

0 17

700-

2120

0

API

/A

16

113

PALA

PA-C

1-K

IND

OSA

T Ex

t Ku

band

Ku

ban

d 13

758

- 139

34

1400

2 - 1

4498

11

452

- 116

20

1225

2 - 1

2748

PA

RT II

-S

17

118

GA

RUD

A-1

-

S ba

nd

L ba

nd

Ext C

ban

d

6425

- 67

25

1610

- 16

60.5

19

80 -

2010

3400

-370

0 15

25-1

559

2170

-220

0 24

83.5

-250

0 15

59-1

567

PART

III-

S

18

118

IND

OST

AR-

118E

M

CI

S ba

nd

X b

and

C b

and

8120

- 82

70

5862

.75

– 59

66.7

5 25

20 -

2670

36

59.1

5 –

3699

.85

RES4

9

19

118

PALA

PA-B

3 TE

LKO

M

C b

and

5927

- 64

23.2

5 37

02 -

4199

.5

PART

II-S

20

118

PALA

PA-B

3 TT

&C

TE

LKO

M

C b

and

5927

- 59

29.5

64

20.7

5 - 6

423.

25

3700

- 37

02.5

41

97.5

- 42

00

PART

II-S

21

118

PALA

PA-B

3-EC

TE

LKO

M

Ext C

ban

d 64

47 -

6703

34

02 -

3658

PA

RT II

-S

22

118

PALA

PA-C

3 TE

LKO

M

C b

and

5927

- 64

03

3702

- 41

98

PART

II-S

23

118

PALA

PA-C

3-K

TELK

OM

Ku

ban

d 13

758

- 144

98

1145

2 - 1

2748

PA

RT II

-S

77


No

Orb

it S

lot

Sate

llite

Fili

ng

Ope

rato

r Fr

eque

ncy

Filin

g St

atus

at I

TU

Band

U

plin

k (M

Hz)

D

ownl

ink

(MH

z)

24

118

PALA

PA-C

3-X

- X

ban

d 79

02 -

8400

72

52 -

7750

PA

RT II

-S

25

118

TELK

OM

-3EK

TE

LKO

M

Ext C

ban

d Ku

ban

d

6425

– 6

725

1375

0– 1

3936

14

000

– 14

500

3400

- 37

00

1145

2 –

1162

8 12

250

– 12

750

CR/

C

26

120.

5 C

SM-1

20

CSM

C

Ban

d Ku

Ban

d Ka

Ban

d

5850

-665

0 27

500-

3100

0 13

710-

1443

0

3400

- 41

90

1770

0 - 2

1200

11

020

- 127

00

API

/A

27

123

GA

RUD

A-2

PS

N

L ba

nd

Ext C

ban

d 16

26.5

-166

0.5

6425

-672

5 15

25 -

1559

34

00 -

3700

PA

RT II

-S

28

144

PALA

PA P

AC

-3R

PSN

C

ban

d Ex

t C b

and

5867

-642

4.5

6427

-672

3 34

02-3

698

3642

-419

9.52

5 C

R/C

29

146

PALA

PA P

AC

-C 1

46E

PSN

C

ban

d Ex

t C b

and

5927

-672

3 34

42-4

198.

15

PART

II-S

30

146

PALA

PA P

AC

-KU

14

6E

PSN

Ku

ban

d 14

021-

1449

7 12

203-

1267

9 PA

RT II

-S

31

146

PSN

-146

E PS

N

Ext L

Ban

d L

Band

S

Band

C

Ban

d X

Ban

d Ku

Ban

d Ka

Ban

d

1399

.5 -

1450

19

80 -

2010

57

25 -

6776

79

00 -

8400

13

750

- 148

00

1151

-135

0 15

18-1

660.

5 25

20-1

670

3400

-420

0 72

50-7

750

1070

0-12

700

1720

0-21

200

API

/A

32

150.

5 PA

LAPA

-C4

IND

OSA

T

C b

and

Ext C

ban

d Ku

ban

d Ex

t Ku

band

5927

- 64

23

6427

- 66

63

1425

4 - 1

4486

13

754

- 139

86

3702

- 41

98

3402

- 36

38

1145

4 - 1

1686

10

954

- 111

86

RES4

33

150.

5 PA

LAPA

-C4-

A

IND

OSA

T

C b

and

Ext C

ban

d Ku

ban

d Ex

t Ku

band

5927

- 64

23

6427

- 66

63

1425

4 - 1

4486

13

754

- 139

86

3702

- 41

98

3402

- 36

38

1145

4 - 1

1686

10

954

– 11

186

CR/

C

78


No

Orb

it S

lot

Sate

llite

Fili

ng

Ope

rato

r Fr

eque

ncy

Filin

g St

atus

at I

TU

Band

U

plin

k (M

Hz)

D

ownl

ink

(MH

z)

34

150.

5 PA

LAPA

-C4-

B IN

DO

SAT

C B

and

Ku B

and

Ka B

and

5850

- 67

00

1375

0 - 1

4500

27

500

- 310

00

3400

- 42

00

1095

0 - 1

1700

12

200

- 127

50

1770

0 - 2

1200

API

/A

35

150.

5 PA

LAPA

-C4-

K IN

DO

SAT

Ext K

u ba

nd

Ku b

and

1375

8 - 1

3394

14

002

- 144

98

1225

2 - 1

2748

11

452

- 116

28

CR/

C

36

NG

SO

LAPA

NSA

T LA

PAN

U

HF

S ba

nd

43

5.32

5 - 4

39.3

25

437.

289

- 437

.361

22

06.5

- 22

33.5

PA

RT II

-S

37

NG

SO

LAPA

N-T

UBS

AT

LAPA

N

UH

F S

band

435.

325

- 439

.325

43

7.28

9 - 4

37.3

61

2206

.5 -

2233

.5

RES4

Note on fi ling status:• AP/A = registration of new fi ling to ITU• CR/C, CR/D, CR/E = Filing within the

phase of coordination with other countries’ Administrations

• RES49 = transmission of data for the plan of satellite launching

• RES4 = extension of the period of fi ling usage

• PART I-S = application for registration of satellite fi ling at ITU database (Master International Frequency Register/MIFR)

• PART II-S = satellite fi ling has been registered at ITU database (MIFR)

• PART III-S = application for registration of satellite fi ling is returned by ITU to Administrations (unfavourable)

Based on the above table, the number of fi ling of Indonesia managed by each satellite operator of Indonesia is as follows:• Telkom : 10 satellite fi lings;• Indosat : 8 satellite fi lings;• MCI : 7 satellite fi lings;• PSN : 5 satellite fi lings;• LAPAN 2 satellite fi lings;• CSM : 3 satellite fi lings.

Currently there are fi ve satellite fi lings of Indonesia that have not been managed yet by satellite operators of Indonesia. Below is the mapping of satellite fi ling of Indonesia in each orbit slot:

79


GGambar 5.2. Petaa Filling Satelit Indonesia

Figure 5.2. Satellite Filing Map in Indonesia

5.4.2. Data of Indonesian Satellite In this Semester 2 Year 2012, there are nine satellites that operate and managed by fi ve operators. The nine satellites have occupied their respective orbits and they are of diff erent types. The fi ve satellite operators are MCI (2 satellites ), Telkom (2 satellites), Indosat (2 satellites), PSN (2 satellites), and LAPAN (1 satellite). Data of Indonesian satellites that operate in Semester 2 Year 2012 are as follows:

No Orbit Slot (BT)

Satellite Name

Operator Transponder Type of

Satellite

Date of Placement in

Orbit

1 107.7 Indostar-2

(SES-7) MCI

Ku Band: 22 (+5) Transponder S Band: 10 (+3) Transponder

Broadcasting Satellite

16 May 2009

2 108 Telkom 1 TELKOM

C band: 24 Transponder Ext C band: 12 Transponder

Fixed Satellite 12 August

1999

3 113 Palapa D INDOSAT

C band: 24 Transponder Ext C band: 11 Transponder Ku band: 5 Transponder


2009

4 118 Indostar 1

(Cakrawarta 1) MCI S band: 5

Transponder Broadcasting

Satellite

10 August 2012

5 118 Telkom 2 TELKOM C band: 24 (+4) Transponder

Fixed Satellite 26 November

2005

6 123 Garuda 1 PSN L band: 88 (+22) Transponder

Mobile Satellite

12 February 2000

7 146 PSN V PSN

C band: 24 Transponder Ku band: 14 Transponder


2012

8 150.5 Palapa C2 INDOSAT


Fixed Satellite 15 May 1996

9 NGSO LAPAN-TUBSAT

LAPAN - Pengamatan

Bumi 10 January

2007

Table 5.12. List of Indonesian Satellites

80


No Orbit Slot (BT)

Satellite Name


Satellite


Orbit

1 107.7 Indostar-2

(SES-7) MCI



16 May 2009




1999




2009

4 118 Indostar 1



Satellite

10 August 2012



2005


Mobile Satellite

12 February 2000

7 146 PSN V PSN



2012




9 NGSO LAPAN-TUBSAT

LAPAN - Pengamatan

Bumi 10 January

2007

No Orbit Slot (BT)

Satellite Name


Satellite


Orbit

1 107.7 Indostar-2

(SES-7) MCI



16 May 2009




1999




2009

4 118 Indostar 1



Satellite

10 August 2012



2005


Mobile Satellite

12 February 2000

7 146 PSN V PSN



2012




9 NGSO LAPAN-TUBSAT

LAPAN - Pengamatan

Bumi 10 January

2007

5.4.3. Maintenance of Indonesian Satellite FilingTo maintain Indonesian fi ling in order not to ebe disturbed by the existence of new fi ling registered by other countries, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology must provide comments on satellite fi ling publication issued by International Telecommunication Union (ITU) on time. These comments are provided within the framework of protecting the national terrestrial and satellite network against potential of interference which may be created by foreign satellite network. Failure or delay in providing timely comments to ITU may cause diminution/disturbance of the Indonesian satellite fi ling specifi cation. The deadline for providing comments is four (4) months since the date of publication of such foreign satellite fi ling in ITU BRIFIC. The ITU BRIFIC publication is issued by ITU once every two weeks. The ITU BRIFIC publication contains data of new satellite network registered by all countries to ITU and the processing data of the management of satellite fi ling at ITU.

81


All along Semester 2 Year 2012 , the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has provided comments for 14 ITU publications on satellite network namely publications of BRIFIC No. 2720 up to BRIFIC No. 2733. Comments on every publication of ITU are as follows :

1. BRIFIC 2720Coordination is needed vis-à-vis foreign satellite networks as follows :

Publication Administration Filing Slot Comments

API/A/7515 Japan N-SAT-Y12-110E 110 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7







CR/C 3064 Sweden SIRIUS-13W-6 13 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C 3065 Sweden SIRIUS-5E-7 5 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C 3066 Korea KOREASAT-93E 93 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C

CR/C/3069 USA HIBLEO-2FL2 NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.21/Cand 9.7

CR/C 3074 Israel AMS-CK-82.5E 82.5 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.11 and 9.21/A

PART I-S Malaysia MEASAT-2R 148 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

82



API/A/4805 MOD-3 USA NPOESS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7336 Kazakstan DZZ-MR NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7545 China CGSAT-A13 142BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7


API/A/7571 China ITS-70.5E 70.5BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7



API/A/7574 China ITS-105E 105BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7



API/A/7603 USA INTELSAT7 157E 157BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7604 USA INTELSAT5A 157E 157BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7


CR/C/3075 Luxemburg LUX-G8-36 135 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3076 LUX LUX-G8-41 105 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3083 USA IRIS-5A 72 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C



CR/C/3085 USA IRIS-7A (172E) 172 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C

CR/C/3086 USA IRIS-8A (177W) 177 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C



CR/C/3095 USA USOBO-6A (66E) 66 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C


CR/C/3097 USA USOBO-8A (87.5E) 87.5 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C




PART I-S India INSAT-NAV-GS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S France PLEIADES NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Australia DDSP-104 104 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Canada NEOSSAT NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

AP30/E588 Netherlands NSS-BSS-G2 108.2E 108.2 BT Disagreement to the proposed assignment


83





CR/C/3086 USA IRIS-8A (177W) 177 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/C









PART I-S India INSAT-NAV-GS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S France PLEIADES NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Australia DDSP-104 104 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Canada NEOSSAT NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

AP30/E588 Netherlands NSS-BSS-G2 108.2E 108.2 BT Disagreement to the proposed assignment


API/A/4805 MOD-3 USA NPOESS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7336 Kazakstan DZZ-MR NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7






API/A/7574 China ITS-105E 105BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7




API/A/7604 USA INTELSAT5A 157E 157BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7


CR/C/3075 Luxemburg LUX-G8-36 135 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3076 LUX LUX-G8-41 105 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A




CR/C/3109 Rusia RSS-VSD-104E 104 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART IS Kanada RADARSAT-3B NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Kanada CHNBSAT-113E 113.2 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

84



API/A/7525 USA USASAT-30E NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7528 India RISAT NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7532 Korea KOMPSAT-3A NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7586 Prancis TARNIS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7662 UAE YAHSAT-G7-70E 70 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7



















CR/C/2740M1 China COMPASS-MEO NGSO

Coordination requested under provision 9.12A(NGSO-GSO), 9.14 (SS-TS), 9.21/A (SS-GSO)and 9.21/C (SS-TS)

CR/C798M1 China COMPASS-58.75E 58,75 BT

Coordination requested under provision 9.14 (SS-TS), 9.21/A (SS-GSO) and 9.21/C (SS-TS)

CR/C799M1 China COMPASS-80E 80 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A (SS-GSO)

CR/C800M1 China COMPASS-110.5E 110.5 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A (SS-GSO)


CR/C3117 Spain SECOMSAT-B1-R_41E 41 BT

Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A (SS-GSO) and 9.21/C (SS-TS)

PART I-S Australia AUSSAT C 156E FSS 156 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Thailand THAICOM-N3 120 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

AP30/E/596 dan

AP30/E/597 PNG

PACIFISAT BSSA-59E and PACIFISAT BSSA-

61E 59 BT, 61 BT

Disagreement for the frequency assignment


85



CR/C/2740M1 China COMPASS-MEO NGSO

Coordination requested under provision 9.12A(NGSO-GSO), 9.14 (SS-TS), 9.21/A (SS-GSO)and 9.21/C (SS-TS)

CR/C798M1 China COMPASS-58.75E 58,75 BT

Coordination requested under provision 9.14 (SS-TS), 9.21/A (SS-GSO) and 9.21/C (SS-TS)


CR/C800M1 China COMPASS-110.5E 110.5 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A (SS-GSO)


CR/C3117 Spain SECOMSAT-B1-R_41E 41 BT

Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A (SS-GSO) and 9.21/C (SS-TS)

PART I-S Australia AUSSAT C 156E FSS 156 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

PART I-S Thailand THAICOM-N3 120 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.7

AP30/E/596 dan

AP30/E/597 PNG

PACIFISAT BSSA-59E and PACIFISAT BSSA-

61E 59 BT, 61 BT

Disagreement for the frequency assignment


API/A/7525 USA USASAT-30E NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7528 India RISAT NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7532 Korea KOMPSAT-3A NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7586 Prancis TARNIS NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7





















API/A/7183 Japan WE WISH NGSO Coordination

requested under provision 9.7

API/A/7529 India CHANDRAYAAN-2 NGSO Coordination


API/A/7589 German SOMP-TUD NGSO Coordination


API/A/7590 China GC-1 NGSO Coordination




API/A/7721 China CHINASAT-C16 105 BT Coordination


API/A/7722 China CHINASAT-C17 110.5 BT Coordination
















CR/C 3118 China COMPASS-IGSO NGSO Coordination

requested under provision 9.12A, 9.14,

86

































































9.21/A, 9.21/C

CR/C 3119 Russia GALS-3 85 BT

Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A,

9.21/C

CR/C 3120 India INSAT-NAV-NGSA NGSO

Coordination requested under provision 9.12A,

9.21/A

CR/C 3121 India INSAT-NAVR-GS NGSO

Coordination requested under provision 9.12A,

9.21/A

CR/C 3122 India INSAT-NAVR(32.5) 32.5 BT

Coordination requested under

provision 9.14, 9.21/A, 9.21/C

CR/C 3123 India INSAT-NAVR(83) 83 BT Coordination

requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C 3124 India INSAT-NAVR(120.5) 120.5 BT Coordination










PART I-S Russia MKA-FKI NGSO Coordination


87



CR/C/3131 France F-MILSATCOM-3E 3 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3132 France F-MILSATCOM-25E 25 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3133 France F-MILSATCOM-45E 45 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A,

9.21/C

CR/C/3134 France F-MILSATCOM-47E 47 BT Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A,

9.21/C

CR/C/3135 France F-MILSATCOM-5W 5 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3136 France F-MILSATCOM-8W 8 BB Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

PART I-S F/ESA INTEGRAL NGSO Coordination requested under provision 9.7


API/B/270 Egypt E-STAR NGSO Coordination


AP30A/E/275 MOD-1 Japan TAIKI-

109.65-34.5

109.65 BT


provision 9.7

CR/C/3142 Russia INTERSPUTNIK-16W-4 16 BB

Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

PART-IS China ASIASAT-AKZ 122.2 BT


provision 9.7

PART-IS China ASIASAT-CKZ 105.5 BT


provision 9.7

PART-IS Japan ASNARO NGSO Coordination


PART-IS Japan SJ-9 NGSO Coordination




88


PART-IS Japan JMCS-2 110 BT Coordination


PART-IS China ASIASAT-EKZ 100.5 BT


provision 9.7


API/A/7237 MOD-2 Israel AMS-C1-137E

137 E Coordination


API/A/7730 Korea GK2A-116.2E 116.2 E Coordination




API/A/7732 China ASIASAT-CKU 105.5 E Coordination


API/A/7733 China ASIASAT-EKU 100.5 E Coordination


API/A/7735 Vietnam VNSAT-90E 90 E Coordination



















API/A/7819 Israel AMS-C2-90E 90 E Coordination

















89




API/A/7843 Thailand THAICOM-51E 51 E Coordination


API/A/7883 Japan SOCRATES NGSO Coordination


API/A/7884 Japan GCOM-C1 NGSO Coordination



CR/C/3118 M 1 China COMPASS-IGSO NGSO Coordination

requested under provision9.12A

CR/C/3120 M 1 India INSAT-NAV-NGSA NGSO

Coordination requested under provision 9.12A

(NGSO-GSO), 9.21/A (SS-GSO),

9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)

CR/C/3121 M 1 India INSAT-NAVR-GS NGSO



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)

CR/C/3122 M 1 India INSAT-NAVR (32.5) 32.5 BT



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)

CR/C/3123 M 1 India INSAT-NAVR (83) 83 BT



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)


































PART-IS Japan JMCS-2 110 BT Coordination


PART-IS China ASIASAT-EKZ 100.5 BT


provision 9.7


API/A/7237 MOD-2 Israel AMS-C1-137E

137 E Coordination






API/A/7732 China ASIASAT-CKU 105.5 E Coordination


API/A/7733 China ASIASAT-EKU 100.5 E Coordination






90




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)

CR/C/3126 M 1 India INSAT-NAVR (121.5)

121.5 BT



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)


126.5 BT



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)


127.5 BT



9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)

Part I-S China SHENZHOU NGSO Coordination

requested under provision9.7







9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)









9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)




9.21/C (SS-TS) and 9.14 (SS-TS)



91




API/A/6504 MOD-1 China ASIASAT-AAB 118 BT Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7182 MOD-1 England UKDSAT-D2 156 BT Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7828 China CHNBSAT-G4-1 62BT Coordination requested under provision9.7


API/A/7830 China CHNBSAT-G4-3 80 E Coordination requested under provision9.7


API/A/7832 China CHNBSAT-G4-5 92.2 E Coordination requested under provision9.7



API/A/7835 China CHNBSAT-G4-8 108.5 E

Coordination requested under provision9.7











API/A/7866 Netherlands NSS-G4-20 35.5 E Coordination requested under provision9.7


API/A/7868 Netherlands NSS-G4-22 51 E Coordination requested under provision9.7



API/A/7871 Netherlands

NSS-G4-25 83 E Coordination requested under provision9.7




NSS-G4-27 108.2 E



NSS-G4-28 113.5 E














API/A/7885 Japan JMCS-110E 110 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7905 Saudi Arabia ARABSAT 8E-34.5E 34.5 E


API/A/7906 Saudi Arabia ARABSAT 8E-44.5E

44.5 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7912 Korea KOREASAT-114.5K

114.5 Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7913 Thailand THAICOM-LSX2 78.5 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7914 Thailand THAICOM-LSX3 119.5 E


CR/C/2740M 2 China COMPASS-MEO (NGSO) NGSO

Coordination requested under provision9.12A

92



CR/C/3160 Russia INTERSPUTNIK-97.8W

97.8 W Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

CR/C/3161 Russia INTERSPUTNIK-113W

Coordination requested under provision 9.21/A

Part IS China DFH-3-OC M 87.5 Coordination requested under provision9.7

Part IIS Australia AUS ADF WEST-5 (104E)

104 E Coordination is required under provision 11.41


API/A/7929 Nigeria NIGERIASAT-X NGSO Coordination requested under provision9.7

CR/C/3172 China LUX-G8-51 (37.5 W) NGSO Coordination requested under provision9.21/A


AP30-30A/F/D/42 Netherlands NSS-BSS 108.2E TTC 108.2 Coordination













NSS-G4-27 108.2 E



NSS-G4-28 113.5 E














API/A/7885 Japan JMCS-110E 110 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7905 Saudi Arabia ARABSAT 8E-34.5E 34.5 E


API/A/7906 Saudi Arabia ARABSAT 8E-44.5E

44.5 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7912 Korea KOREASAT-114.5K

114.5 Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7913 Thailand THAICOM-LSX2 78.5 E Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7914 Thailand THAICOM-LSX3 119.5 E


CR/C/2740M 2 China COMPASS-MEO (NGSO) NGSO

Coordination requested under provision9.12A


API/A/6504 MOD-1 China ASIASAT-AAB 118 BT Coordination requested under provision9.7

API/A/7182 MOD-1 England UKDSAT-D2 156 BT Coordination requested under provision9.7





API/A/7832 China CHNBSAT-G4-5 92.2 E Coordination requested under provision9.7















93





API/A/7931 China ASIASAT-100.3T 100.3 Coordination requested under provision 9.7




API/A/7955 Egypt EGJAN9B 34 E Coordination requested under provision 9.7






API/A/7965 India INSAT-NAV(93.5) 93.5 E Coordination requested under provision 9.7

CR/C/2785 M Bangladesh BDSAT 102E 98.5 BT Coordination requested under provision9.21/A

CR/C/3180 Canada CANPOL (NGSO) 60 BT Coordination requested under provision9.12A

and 9.21/A

Part IS Japan N-Sat-124E 124 E Coordination requested under provision 9.7

Part IS Japan N-Sat-128E 128 E Coordination requested under provision 9.7


AP30/E/605 China CHNBSAT-101.4E 101.4 E

Disagreement to the

proposed assignment

AP30/E/607 Israel AMS-BSS-CI-65E (65 E) 65 E

Disagreement to the

proposed assignment

API/A/7652 MOD-1 UAE MADAR-46E 46 E

Coordination requested

under provision 9.7

API/A/7653 MOD-1 UAE MADAR-47.5E 47.5 E


under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision

9.11

API/A/7978 China COMPASS-80.3E 80.3 E


under provision 9.7

94


5.4.4. Holding of Satellite Coordination MeetingIn order to settle the interference potential that may be created by foreign satellite network towards national satellite network, a bilateral meeting is held between Indonesian Administration and other Administration for satellite coordination. Such satellite coordination may be implemented in a home or away procedure. Satellite coordination may be done based on ITU provision within the framework of satellite fi ling registration.

In 2012, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology planned to hold 10 satellite coordination meetings with Telecommunication Administrations of other countries, i.e. Luxemburg, Japan, USA, Russia, China, UAE, Thailand, Australia, Netherlands, and Tonga. Out of 10 planned meetings for satellite coordination, only three meetings could be held, i.e. 1) Satellite coordination meeting Indonesia – Luxemburg in Bali on16-20

April 2012;2) Satellite coordination meeting Indonesia – Japan in Surabaya on 21 – 25

May 2012;3) Satellite coordination meeting Indonesia – USA in Washington, DC on 5 –

9 November 2012.



Disagreement to the

proposed assignment


Disagreement to the

proposed assignment



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision

9.11



under provision 9.7



Disagreement to the

proposed assignment


Disagreement to the

proposed assignment



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision

9.11



under provision 9.7

API/A/8014 Canada NEOSSAT-1A NGSO


under provision 9.7

95


The other seven satellite coordination meetings could not be held due to some constraints faced, among other things :a). Schedule between two Administrations could not be adjusted, i.e.

satellite coordination meeting with Administrations of Australia, Russia, China, and Thailand..

b) There was no consensus as regards fi xing the agenda of the satellite coordination meeting, namely satellite coordination with UAE.

c) No response to the proposal sent by the Indonesian Administration for the holding of satellite coordination meeting, namely with the Administrations of Tonga and Netherlands.

The results of satellite coordination meetings held in 2012 are as follows 1. Satellite coordination meeting with Administration of Luxemburg This meeting was held in Bali on 16 – 20 April 2012 with the involvement

of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and the Centre for International Cooperation of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology which both of them form a regulatory body, national satellite operators (LAPAN, TELKOM, INDOSAT, PSN/ACeS, MCI, and CSM), Head of Frequency Department of Institut Luxembourgeois de Régulation as Representative of Luxemburg Administration and Satellite Operator of

Luxemburg (SES). In that meeting, the two Administrations reached a general agreement that satellite coordination for orbit separation of more than 8 degrees for C band, 7 degrees for Ku Band, 8 degrees for Ka Band, and 14 degrees for X Band with jointly agreed criteria, the coordination may be considered settled. Besides, discussions took place on 42 agenda items of satellite coordination, where 17 agenda items have been completed, while the remainder is to be further discussed by correspondence and the next satellite coordination meeting.

2. Satellite coordination meeting with Administration of Japan This meeting was held in Surabaya on 21 – 25 May 2012 which the

involvement of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and the Centre for International Cooperation of the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology which both of them form a regulatory body, national satellite operators (LAPAN, TELKOM, INDOSAT, PSN/ACeS, MCI, and CSM), Representative of Japanese Administration and Satellite Operator of Japan. In that coordination meeting, 21 agenda items of satellite coordination were discussed,

96


where 6 agenda items of satellite coordination have been completed, 6 agenda items have been partially completed, and the remainder will be further discussed at the next satellite coordination meeting or by correspondence. The result of satellite coordination meeting with Japan is contained in Attachment 2.

3. Satellite coordination meeting with Administration of USA This meeting was held in Washington, D.C. on 5-9 November 2012,

attended by the representative of Directorate of Spectrum Policy and Planning of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology and national satellite operators, i.e. LAPAN, PT TELKOM, PT INDOSAT and PT CSM. On the part of USA Administration, the meeting was attended by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and Representative of operator USA Satellite (US Department of Defense, consultant of US Department of Defense from ITT Exelis and Alion Science an Technology, and operator of Intelsat Satellite).

The two Administrations agreed to discuss 33 agenda items in that satellite coordination meeting. Out of 33 agenda items, 25 agenda items could be successfully completed, 3 agenda items were partially completed, and agreement on 5 agenda items could not be achieved for which further discussion will be done by correspondence or by the next satellite coordination meeting

97


Table 5.13 Agenda of Coordination of Indonesian Satellites with those of other Countries

Agenda Ite Description Coordination Result

2.1.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E (108E) vis-à-vis IRIS-1A (105W), -2A (100W), -3A (22.5W), -4A (15.5W), -5A (72E), -6A (75E), -7A (172E), -8A (177W), -9A (145W), -10A (29E), and –11A (125E) at bands of 30-31 and 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.1.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E (108E) vis-à-vis USGOVSAT-1R (180), -2R (151W), -3R (135W), -4R (130W), -5R (112W), -6R (52.5W), -7R (42.5W), -8 (12W), -9R (57E), -10 (60E), -11R (150E), -12 (175E), -13R (121.9W), -14R (77W), -16R (24E), -18R (78.5E), -19R (86E), and -20R (134E) at bands of 30-31 and 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.2.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E ) vis-à-vis MILSTAR-1 (90W), -4 (55E), -5 (90E), -6 (120W), -8 (68W), -13 (4E), and –14 (177.5E) at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.2.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E vis-à-vis USGAE-1 (90W), -2 (4E), -3M (90E), -4 (177.5E), -5M (55E), -6M (120W), -7M (68W), -8M (9W), -9R (152E), -10R (150W), -11M (93E), -12M (111E), -13M (96E), -14M (16.5W),-15M (31.5W), -16R (30E), -17R (39W), -18M (155W), and -23M (19E) at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed, except for coordination vis-à-vis satellite network of USGAE-12M (111E) (Partially Completed)

2.2.3

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E vis-à-vis USOBO-1A (159.4W), -2A (96.8W), -3A (49.4W), -4A (21.2W), -5A (20.6E), -6A (66E), -7A (73E), -8A (87.5E), -9A (94E), -10A (130.6E), and –11A (139E) at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.3.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E vis-à-vis USCSID-A1 (0E), -A2 (44E), -A3 (75E), -A4 (82E), -A5 (92E), -A6 (110E), -E1 (10W), -E2 (13W), -E3 (24W), -E4 (30W), -W1 (141W), and -W2 (144W) at bands of 30-31 and 17.8-21.2 GHz

Completed, except for coordination vis-à-vis network of USCSID-A6 (110E) at bands of 17.8-21.2 GHz downlink and 30-31 GHz uplink (Partially Completed)

2.3.2 Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E vis-à-vis USNN-3 (127W), -4 (100E), and -5 (170E) at bands of30-31 and 17.8-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.3.3 Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E and USDKH2 (30.4W) at bands of 17.8-21.2 and 30-31 GHz

Completed

2.4.1 Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E and USCSID-P (NGSO) at band of 18.8-19.3 GHz Completed

98




Disagreement to the

proposed assignment


Disagreement to the

proposed assignment



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision

9.11



under provision 9.7


2.5.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E (108E) vis-à-vis FLTSATCOM-C WPAC-2 (177W), -EPAC-1 (105W), -EPAC-2 (100W), -EATL-1 (22.5W), -EATL-2 (15.5W), -INDOC-1 (29E), -INDOC-2 (72E), -INDOC-3 (75E), dan –WPAC-1 (172E), FLTSATCOM W PAC (172E), -ATL (23W), -E-PAC (100W), FLTSATCOM-A INDOC-4 (100E) at bands of 7250-7750 and 7900-8400 MHz

Completed

2.5.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E (108E) vis-à-vis USGCSS PH3 E PAC-2 (130W), -INDOC (60E), -INDOC-2 (57E), -MID-ATL (42.5W), -W PAC (175E), -W PAC-2 (180E), USGCSS PH3B ATL (12W), E PAC (135W), E PAC-2 (130W), INDOC (60E), INDOC-2 (57E), MID-ATL (42.5W), W ATL (52.5W), W PAC (175E), W PAC-2 (180E), W PAC-3 (150E) at bands of 7250-7750 and 7900-8400 MHz

Completed

2.5.3

Coordination between Satellite Network of TELKOM-108E (108E) vis-à-vis USGOVSAT-1R (180), -2R (151W), -3R (135W), -4R (130W), -5R (112W), -6R (52.5W), -7R (42.5W), -8 (12W), -9R (57E), -10 (60E), -11R (150E), -12 (175E), -13R (121.9W), -14R (77W), -16R (24E), -18R (78.5E), -19R (86E), and 20R (134E) at bands of 7250-7750 and 7900-8400 MHz

Completed

2.6.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis IRIS-1A (105W), -2A (100W), -3A (22.5W), -4A (15.5W), -5A (72E), -6A (75E), -7A (172E), -8A (177W), -9A (145W), -10A (29E), and –11A (125E) at bands of 30-31 and 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.6.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USGOVSAT-1R (180), -2R (151W), -3R (135W), -4R (130W), -5R (112W), -6R (52.5W), -7R (42.5W), -8 (12W), -9R (57E), -10 (60E), -11R (150E), -12 (175E), -13R (121.9W), -14R (77W), -16R (24E), -18R (78.5E), -19R (86E), and 20R (134E) at bands of 30-31 and 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.6.3

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis KASATCOM-2 (22.5W), -3 (72E), and -5 (172E) at bands of 30-31 and 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.7.1 Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis MILSTAR-1 (90W), -4 (55E), -5 (90E), -6 (120W), -8

Completed

99




Disagreement to the

proposed assignment


Disagreement to the

proposed assignment



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision 9.7



under provision

9.11



under provision 9.7


(68W), -13 (4E), and –14 (177.5E)at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

2.7.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USGAE-1 (90W), -2 (4E), -3M (90E), -4 (177.5E), -5M (55E), -6M (120W), -7M (68W), -8M (9W), -9R (152E), -10R (150W), -11M (93E), -12M (111E), -13M (96E), -14M (16.5W),-15M (31.5W), -16R (30E), -17R (39W), -18M (155W), and -23M (19E) at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed, except for coordination between satellite network of CSM-111 (111E) and USGAE-12M (111E) (Partially Completed)

2.7.3

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E),and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USOBO-1A (159.4W), -2A (96.8W), -3A (49.4W), -4A (21.2W), -5A (20.6E), -6A (66E), -7A (73E), -8A (87.5E), -9A (94E), -10A (130.6E), and –11A (139E) at band of 20.2-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.8.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USCSID-A1 (0E), -A2 (44E), -A3 (75E), -A4 (82E), -A5 (92E), -A6 (110E), -E1 (10W), -E2 (13W), -E3 (24W), -E4 (30W), -W1 (141W), and -W2 (144W) at bands of 30-31 and 17.8-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.8.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USNN-3 (127W), -4 (100E), and -5 (170E) at bands of 30-31 and 17.8-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.8.3

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis USDKH2 (30.4W) at bands of 30-31 and 17.8-21.2 GHz

Completed

2.9.1 Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM series vis-à-vis USCSID-P (NGSO) at band of 18.8-19.3 GHz Completed

2.10.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) series networks and the TDRS 85E (85E), 89E (89E), and 133E (133E) at Ku band.

Completed

2.11.1

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), and CSM-120 (120.5E) series networks and the TDRS 85E (85E), 89E (89E), and 133E (133E) at Ku band.

Completed

3.1.1 Discussion on general agreement for coordination between Satellite Network of CSM and Intelsat at C and Ku bands.

Completed

100



3.1.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of CSM-106 (106E), CSM-111 (111E), CSM-120 (120.5E) vis-à-vis satellite network of Intelsat satellite at C and Ku bands with the same or more distance of orbit separation from 5 degrees.

Completed

3.1.3 Coordination between Satellite network of CSM in the future with the possibility of exceeding the value agreed in the General Agreement

To be discussed by correspondence or at the forthcoming satellite coordination meeting.

3.2.1 Discussion on General Agreement for coordination between Indosat satellite network and Intelsat at C and Ku bands.

For C band, the value agreed will constantly refer to the General Agrrement made earlier in the year 1999. For Ku band, no consensus reached on the value for General Agreement. Discussion will further be pursued by correspondence or at the forthcoming satellite coordination meeting.

3.2.2

Coordination between Satellite Network of PALAPA-C4-K (150.5E) vis-à-vis INTELSAT5A 157E, INTELSAT6 157E, INTELSAT7 157E and INTELSAT8 157E (157E) at Ku band; coordination between Satellite Network of PALAPA-C4/-C4-A vis-à-vis INTELSAT5A 157E, INTELSAT6 157E, INTELSAT7 157E and INTELSAT8 157E (157E) at C and Ku; bands and coordination between satellite network of PALAPA-C4-B (150.5E) vis-à-vis Intelsat series at orbit slot of 157E at C and Ku bands.

Completed

3.2.3 Coordination between Satellite Network of PALAPA-C1-B (113E) vis-à-vis satellite network of Intelsat series at orbit slot of 157E at C and Ku bands.

Completed

3.3.1 Coordination between Satellite network of LAPANSAT (NGSO) and CYGNUS (NGSO) at band of 2 206.5 – 2 233.5 MHz

To be discussed by correspondence or at the forthcoming satellite coordination meeting.

101


5.4.5. License for Satellite Landing Right Any usage of foreign satellite in Indonesia must be equipped with landing right. The Satellite Landing Right is the right to use foreign satellite provided by the Minister to telecommunication providers or broadcasting institutions. Any telecommunication provider or broadcasting institution that will use foreign satellite shall own landing right.

For semester 2 year 2012, the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has issued nine (9) landing right licenses to telecommunication providers that use twelve (12) foreign satellites. Hence, up to now the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology has issued 92 landing right licenses of foreign satellites for the use of 32 foreign satellites. The foreign satellites used origin from 13 Administrations, i.e. Netherlands, Belorussia, China, Great Britain, Japan, Germany, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, United Arab Emirates, USA, and Luxemburg.

Table 5.14. License for Landing Right in Indonesia in Semester 2-2012

NO LANDING RIGHT NO.

COMPANY NAME

SATELLITE NAME

ORBIT SLOT ADMINISTRATION

1 20 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/7/2012 PT. KHASANAH TEKNOLOGI PERSADA

JCSAT-4B 124° BT JAPAN

2 21 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/7/2012 PT.TEPIAN MULTIMEDIA ASIASAT 3S 105.5° BT CHINA

ASIASAT 5 100.5° BT CHINA

3 22 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/7/2012 PT. MEGA MEDIA

INDONESIA ABS-1 75° BT BELARUS

4 23 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/7/2012 PT. SRIWIJAYA MITRA

MEDIA

ASIASAT 3S 105.5° BT CHINA


5 24 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/8/2012 PT. PATRA

TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA

CHINASAT-10 110.5° BT CHINA

6 25 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/9/2012 PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI

INDONESIA, Tbk

CHINASAT-10 110.5° BT CHINA

JCSAT-5A 132° BT JAPAN

7 26 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/10/2012 PT. PASIFIKTEL

INDOTAMA INTELSAT 12 45° BT GERMANY

8 27 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/10/2012 PT. BIZNET MULTIMEDIA

INTELSAT 8 166° BT USA

ASIASAT 3S 105.5° BT CHINA


APSTAR 7 76.5° BT CHINA

MEASAT 3 132° BT JEPANG

APSTAR 5 138° BT TONGA

ABS-1 75° BT BELARUS

9 28 -OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/12/2012 PT. PASIFIKTEL

INDOTAMA EUTELSAT 172A 172° BT USA

102


Table 5.15 The above description may be mapped as follows :.

License for Satellite Landing Right In Indonesia in Semester II

Year 2012

ORBIT SLOT

166.

BT

172°

BT

75°

BT

105.

5 °B

T

100.

5 °B

T

110.

5 °B

T

76.5

° BT

124°

BT

132°

BT

91.5

° BT

45°B

T

138°

BT

ADMINISTRA TION

USA

USA

Belo

russ

ia

Chi

na

Chi

na

Chi

na

Chi

na

Japa

n

Japa

n

Mal

aysi

a

Ger

man

y

Tong

a

No LANDING

RIGHT NO. NAME

OF COMPANY NUM BER

INTE

LSA

T-8

EUTE

LSA

T-17

2A

ABS

-1

ASI

ASA

T 3S

ASI

ASA

T 5

CH

INA

SAT-

10

APS

TAR-

7

JCSA

T-4B

JCSA

T-5A

MEA

SAT-

3

INTE

LSA

T-12

APS

TAR-

5 (T

ELST

AR

18)

1 20 -

OS/DJSDPPI.2/HLS/7/2012

PT. KHASANAH TEKNOLOGI PERSADA

X

2 21 -


PT.TEPIAN MULTIMEDIA

X X

3 22 -


PT. MEGA MEDIA INDONESIA

X

4 23 -


PT. SRIWIJAYA MITRA MEDIA

X X

5 24 -


PT. PATRA TELEKOMUNIKASI

INDONESIA X

6 25 -


PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA, Tbk X X

7 26 -


PT. PASIFIKTEL INDOTAMA

X

8 27 -


PT. BIZNET MULTIMEDIA

X X X X X X X

9 28 -


PT. PASIFIKTEL INDOTAMA

X

TOTAL 1 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL BASED ON ADMINISTRATIONSI 2 2 9 2 1 1 1

103


6CHAPTER

104


105


Radio frequency spectrum (frequency) is a very vital and limited resource in telecommunication world. The technological development in the fi eld of telecommunication particularly cellular telecommunication and internet service and other wireless-based special communication causes the utilization of frequency resources become very high as well. This implies the need for management, regulation and supervision of frequency usage in the territory of Indonesia. Moreover, the frequency utilization has also been using a variety of telecommunication equipment and technology which are increasingly growing and increasingly diverse equipment. Increase in frequency usage is also followed by the increasingly diverse use of frequencies for various needs since the use of telecommunication facilities is increasingly varied with the increasingly high use of technology.

Statistics in the fi eld of frequency operation show current condition of the use of frequency spectrum band by various parties and for various requirements and the use of frequency according to service and band. Utilization of frequency by various parties is the important part in the management of frequency resources for communication and information technology activities, particularly in conducting monitoring of frequency usage by stakeholders according to the type of frequency band used. Management of this frequency usage is also related to the level of frequency utilization which

FREQUENCY OPERATION

CHAPTER 6

106


has been going on, especially for some types of frequency used by public and inter-regional distribution.

Besides utilization of frequency by stakeholders and the usage and policy management by government as regulator, frequency management is also related to selection of frequency-used operator. In this case, license/certifi cation becomes the selection and control mechanism towards frequency-used community. There are three types of licenses related to the use of frequency by individual, i.e. License for Radio Amateur (IAR), License for Inter-Inhabitant Radio Communication (IKRAP) and Certifi cate for Radio Amateur Communication (SKAR). Besides using license mechanism, control to ensure the use of frequency correctly and wisely is performed through education and examination done to the candidates of frequency-used radio operator. Training and examination performed consist of Certifi cation for Concession Radio Operator Profi ciency (SKOR) and Radio Electronics and Radio Operator (REOR). Through license instrument, training and examination for radio frequency users, especially for frequency spectrum which is widely used by the society, will run better and will not harm one another of the users and will support the conduct of frequency structuring.

6.1 Scope

Statistical data of the fi eld of frequency operation presented in this book includes the number of frequency spectrum usages based on frequency band, the number of frequency spectrum usages by type of frequency setting, and the number of frequency spectrum usages based on its allotment. The overall data is also mapped of its usage according to the province. Furthermore, analysis is also performed to calculate the number of frequency usages according to subservice of TV, Radio (AM / FM), and GSM in each province. In particular, frequency for certain subservices such as TV, Radio (AM / FM), and GSM / DCS will be seen of their use between regions by comparing the vastness of the areas of the regions (provinces) and the number of their population. From the side of regulating frequency-used community, analysis is performed on the issuance of licenses and certifi cates for frequency-used amateur radio operators and analysis is also done on the activity and the result of training and examination of amateur radio operators.

Statistics of frequency operation presented in this report include:1) Statistics of the use of frequency spectrum based on frequency band

107


(example: VLF, LF, MF, HF, etc.) and provinces of the years of 2010 - 2012;2) Use of frequency based on service and subservice in the years of 2010 -

2012;3) Use of frequency according to islands, provinces, service and subservice

in semester 2 of 2012;4) Comparison of the number of frequency usages for TV, AM Radio, FM

Radio, and GSM with the number of population and the vastness of the area for each province in semester 2 of 2012;

5) Level of utilization and investment opportunity in frequency usages of FM Radio, Analog TV and Digital TV (DVB-T);

5) Issuance of the licenses for Radio Amateurs which include IAR, IKRAP, and SKAR in semester 2 of 2012;

6) Monitoring result of REOR and SKOR implementation in semester 2 of 2012.

Statistical data of frequency operation presented and analyzed in this chapter was obtained directly from Directorate of Spectrum Licensing of the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in the latest data position, i.e. 31 December 2012, while the data of population and the vastness of provincial regions was obtained from Central Body of Statistics.

6.2 Concept and Defi nition

Defi nitions of terminology used in the presentation of the following frequency data were composed in order to provide the same interpretation to terminology used. Some concepts and defi nitions used in further discussion of this chapter of frequency operation are:1. Telecommunication is any transmission, emission or reception of any

signs, signals, writing, images, and voices or any expression of mind by wire, radio, optical, or other electromagnetic systems;

2. Radio frequency spectrum is a composition of radio frequency bands that has frequency of less than 3000 GHz as a unit of electromagnetic wave vibration that propagates and contained in the aerospace (air space and outer space);

3. Radio frequency spectrum allocation is an inclusion of certain radio frequency bands with the purpose of usage by one or more terrestrial radio communication services or space radio communication services or astronomical radio communication services based on certain requirements;

108


4. Radio is a general term used in radio wave utilization;5. Radio Wave or Hertz Wave is electromagnetic wave with frequency of

less than 3000 GHz, that propagates in space without artifi cial means of conductor;

6. Radio communication is telecommunication through the medium of radio wave;

7. Terrestrial radio communication is any radio communication other than space radio communication or astronomical radio communication;

8. Space radio communication is any radio communication which includes the use of one or more space stations, or the use of one or more satellite refl ectors or any other object existing in space;

9. Radio navigation is a determinant radio used for the purpose of navigation, including notifi cation of warning about objects that block;

10. Astronomical radio is astronomy based on reception of radio wave from cosmos.

6.3. Frequency Usage (ISR)

6.3.1. Usage Based on Frequency BandIntensity of frequency band usage up to semester 2 of 2012 showed high usage. This is shown by the total of frequency usage which up to the end of 2012 achieved 384,332 or increased by around 15.8% compared to that of the previous year. This increase in 2012 was also higher than in the previous year (2011) which only increased by 4.6%. This increase of the use of frequency band in 2012 was mainly from the increase of two frequency spectrums the use of which was quite large, i.e. VHF spectrum (30 MHz – 300 MHz), and SHF spectrum (300 MHz – 3 GHz). Table 6.1 shows that for the type of VHF frequency spectrum, its usage in 2012 increased by 8.5% compared to its usage during one year in 2011. This increase was also higher than the increase in 2011 which increased by 7.8%. Meanwhile, for UHF spectrum, its increase was only 0.4% or smaller than the increase of last year which was 0.8%. SHF spectrum whose usage is the greatest than other bands also experienced the greatest increase, achieving 25.5% compared to that in the previous year. This increase of SHF band usage in 2012 was much greater than the increase in 2011 which was only 6.7%. In the meantime, for two other spectrums which were also used, namely MF and HF spectrums, they had been showing consistent decrease of usage since 2009. In 2012, MF spectrum usage decreased quite big, i.e. -30.7%, while HF spectrum decreased only -3.4% or smaller than its decrease in 2011 which achieved 5.4%.

109


*VLF (Very Low Frequency) and LF (Low Frequency) data could not be exposed due to low frequency usage (less than 300 kHz) concerning the usage for special purposes such as for military purposes and there were not many bandwidths in the radio spectrum.

If seen from the composition of usage according to frequency spectrum, it still showed the same pattern of composition from year to year where the highest usage was still for SHF spectrum which existed in the range of 3 GHz up to 30 GHz, followed by the usage of UHF frequency spectrum in the band range of 300 MHz up to 3 GHz. The proportion of the usage of SHF spectrum up to this semester 2 of 2012 reached 64.35 % or increased by 4.95% from the previous year. This usage is far bigger than for other types of spectrum bands. In the meantime, the proportion of usage of UHF spectrum type achieved 27.1% or decreased from 2011 which achieved 31.26%.

In general, frequency spectrum group of VHF, UHF, and SHF include 98.5% of frequency usage. Increase and decrease of the proportion in this group is not too signifi cant. Whereas HF and MF, have been consistently decreased from year to year until less than 2%. The proportion of HF frequency usage which in 2009 was still 2.2% decreased to only 1.4% in 2012. The decrease in the proportion of MF frequency usage is seen from the decrease in the usage of MF frequency which has been going on since 2009.

No. Name of Spectrum Frequency Band 2010 2011 2012

1 VLF* (3 kHz – 30 kHz) 0 0 0

2 LF* (30 kHZ – 300 kHz) 0 0 0

3 MF (300 kHz – 3 MHz) 348 328 227

4 HF (3 MHz – 30 MHz) 5.891 5.571 5.381

5 VHF (30 MHz – 300 MHz) 23.266 25.081 27.223

6 UHF (300 MHz – 3 GHz) 102.917 103.724 104.165

7 SHF (3 GHz - 30 GHz) 184.777 197.107 247.336

8 EHF (30 GHz – 300 GHz) 0 0 0

Total 317,199 331,811 384,332

Table 6.1. Number of Frequency Usages (ISR) Based on Frequency Bands

V

EHF (30 GHz

SHF (3 GHz -

UHF (300 MH

VHF (30 MHz

HF (3 MHz – 3

MF (300 kHz

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

– 300 GHz)

30 GHz)

Hz – 3 GHz)

z – 300 MHz)

30 MHz)

– 3 MHz)

20100.00%

58.25%

32.45%

7.33%

1.86%

0.11%

20110.00%

59.40%

31.26%

7.56%

1.68%

0.10%

20120.00%

64.35%

27.10%

7.08%

1.40%

0.06%

2%

%

%

%

%

%

Figure 6.1. Composition of Frequency Usage based on Frequency Band

110


The total increase in the usage of frequency spectrum resulted in the signifi cant increase of cumulative usage of frequency bands compared to previous year. Cumulatively, the usage of frequency band in 2012 has increased by 26.1% from the position at the end of 2011. This increase was slightly lower compared to that of the year 2011 which achieved 29%. The highest increase of cumulative usage of this frequency occurred for the type of SHF frequency spectrum band which increased by 37%. The large increase of this SHF spectrum in these last two years became signifi cant since it caused cumulative usage of this HF spectrum band exceeding the usage of UHF spectrum band. Until the end of 2010, the type of UHF spectrum band was the biggest cumulative usage. However, the bigger and higher usage of SHF spectrum band caused its current cumulative usage to become the biggest, exceeding the UHF band usage. The rate of increase in the cumulative usage of UHF spectrum band was slower that the rate of increase of cumulative usage of SHF spectrum band. In 2012, the rate of increase of cumulative usage of UHF spectrum band was only 15.9% or lower compared to its increase in the previous year which achieved 18.8%.

The next biggest increase of cumulative usage of frequency bands was for the usage of VHF band. Cumulative usage of VHF bands increased by 24.1% or lower than that in 2011 which achieved 28.6%, while the usage of MF frequency, despite small intensity of its usage, yet the cumulative usage of its frequency increased by 14.9%, decreasing quite big compared to that in 2011 which increased by 27.8%. Cumulative usage of UHF frequency which was high, also increased by 15.9% compared to that in the previous year.

No Nama Spektrum Pita Frekuensi 2010 2011 2012

1 VLF (3 kHz – 30 kHz) 0 0 0

2 LF (30 kHZ – 300 kHz) 0 0 0

3 MF (300 kHz – 3 MHz) 1,193 1,521 1,748

4 HF (3 MHz – 30 MHz) 30,013 35,584 40,965

5 VHF (30 MHz – 300 MHz) 87,668 112,749 139,972

6 UHF (300 MHz – 3 GHz) 550,270 653,994 758,159

7 SHF (3 GHz - 30 GHz) 470,754 667,861 915,197

8 EHF (30 GHz – 300 GHz) 16 16 16

Jumlah 1,139,914 1,471,725 1,856,057

Table 6.2. Cumulative Use of

Frequency (ISR) Based on Frequency Band

111


Bali-NusTenggar

5.4%

sa a,

Kalimantan, 9.3%

Jaw

Sulaw5.7%

wa, 52.5%

wesi, %

MaPapu

Sumatera, 25.7%

aluku-ua, 1.3%

Besides the usage of frequency bands which indicated the tendency of increasing, distribution of frequency bands usage according to big islands showed that the usage of frequency bands up to this semester 2 of 2012 was still dominated by the usage in Java Island. Figure 6.2 shows that the proportion of the usage of frequency spectrum bands in Java for all types of frequency bands reached 52.5%. This proportion was also slightly bigger compared to that of the previous year which reached 51.2%. The increase of proportion in Java island has an impact to the decrease of frequency usage proportion in other big islands. Proportion of frequency band usage in Sumatra which became the second biggest decreased from 26.2% in 2011 to 25.7% in 2012, while for other big islands, despite having wider area, the usage of frequency bands was much smaller. The proportion of frequency band usage for regions of Maluku and Papua which have the widest land and sea areas compared to other regions, was only 1.3%, also decreased from the previous year which reached 1.5%. This distribution of frequency band usage shows that frequency usage is not determined by the vastness of the area, but more on the intensity of activities and the progress of the region in that area, which is also refl ected from the density of population or the rate of its economic development.

Distribution of frequency usage according to provinces also

shows that the usage of frequency bands tends to be high in areas with large p o p u l a t i o n , more advance level of economy and high dynamism of the region (among other things marked by a lot of urban areas). Table 6.3 shows that the highest usage of ISR frequency band is found in West Java which is much higher than in other regions. Besides having many administrative regions (districts/municipalities), with vast area, West Java also has the biggest population. Being located near Jakarta as the center of government administration, business and economy activities also makes West Java have a high level of progress and high socio-economic dynamism which implied in the high intensity of frequency band usage. Other regions which also have high intensity of frequency band usage are regions in Java

Figure 6.2. Distribution of Frequency Band Usage according to Big Islands

112


such as Jakarta, Central Java and East Java. Those regions, except Jakarta, have the same characteristics namely they have many administrative regions (districts/municipalities) which also means that their social dynamism is high, big number of population with relatively high density, the level of economic progress is relatively high, and have enough wide areas. Particularly for Jakarta, despite having small area, it has a high density of population, relatively high economic progress level and also high dynamism of region as metropolitan city so that the intensity of its frequency usage is high as well.

On the contrary, the regions which show low usage of ISR frequency band are those with relatively low level of progress, low socio-economy dynamism, although they have very wide area and do not have many urban areas, such as West Papua, North Maluku and Gorontalo. In Sumatra, region with low usage of ISR frequency band is found in Bengkulu which also has characteristics of relatively less progress level and urban areas which have not developed.

No. Province Frequency Band

MF HF VHF UHF SHF EHF 1 NAD 10 81 848 2,378 5,045 0 2 North Sumatra 29 293 2,234 6,481 14,904 0 3 West Sumatra 11 54 638 2,310 5,483 0 4 Riau 3 244 1,419 4,822 9,551 0 5 Jambi 1 101 738 1317 3744 0 6 South Sumatra 10 127 1581 2970 7889 0 7 Bengkulu 3 42 241 583 1541 0 8 Lampung 10 82 411 3,063 7,119 0 9 Riau Islands 1 51 684 1,756 4,324 0 10 Bangka Belitung 0 55 269 708 2539 0 11 Banten 5 32 472 4844 13081 0 12 DKI Jakarta 4 318 835 10494 24224 0 13 West Java 30 137 2070 15816 43578 0 14 Central Java 43 90 1688 10183 22820 0 15 DI Yogyakarta 0 13 379 2218 4968 0 16 East Java 12 225 1688 13981 27494 0 17 Bali 5 68 685 3029 6237 0 18 West Nusa Tenggara 4 71 795 1,825 4,063 0 19 East Nusa Tenggara 2 287 886 762 2,007 0 20 West Kalimantan 5 228 576 1804 5944 0 21 South Kalimantan 2 75 1644 1585 4409 0 22 Central Kalimantan 5 242 810 1248 3008 0 23 East Kalimantan 2 406 2922 3340 7557 0 24 South Sulawesi* 16 114 657 3,036 7,068 0 25 Central Sulawesi 6 118 394 693 2,061 0 26 South East Sulawesi 0 37 344 601 1,535 0 27 North Sulawesi 1 93 348 1,155 2,787 0 28 Gorontalo 0 0 56 172 762 0 29 Maluku 1 301 472 294 527 0 30 North Maluku 0 123 170 88 269 0 31 Irjabar/West Papua 0 0 0 48 97 0 32 Papua 6 1,239 269 561 701 0

Table 6.3 Usage of Frequency Band per Province in 2012

113


If viewed from the composition of usage for the type of frequency band, the same as the pattern occurred nationally, the biggest proportion of frequency usage was for the type of SHF frequency band. The proportion of SHF frequency band usage in the provinces in average reached 60.8%. This average is increased quite signifi cantly compared to that in 2011 which was only reached 55.9%. This increase is in line with the total increase of intensity of SHF spectrum band usage. However, for some regions, especially those in eastern part such as in Maluku, North Maluku and Papua, they showed relatively low proportion of SHF frequency band usage, namely around 33.2%. The biggest usage of frequency band in Papua was precisely for band type of HF with the proportion of 44.6%. In the meantime, in Maluku and North Maluku, HF, VHF, UHF, and SHF were relatively evenly distributed. West Papua shows a diff erent condition where the domination of frequency band usage was only for two types of band, i.e. SHF which achieved 66.9% and UHF 33.1%, and none for other types of bands.

The second biggest proportion of ISR frequency band usage in most of the provinces was for the type of UHF band. The proportion of UHF frequency band usage in average in each province achieved 24.9%. In West Papua, which in 2011 the proportion of UHF was the biggest, in 2012 followed the same pattern as in other regions, namely the dominant usage of SHF frequency. The diff erence in fact occurred in Papua where spectrum band usage was dominated by HF band usage.

Despite having small area, Jakarta has high density of population, advanced economic level and also high dynamism of area as metropolitan city so that the intensity of its frequency usage is also high.





*) Including West Sulawesi which is an Expanded Province from South Sulawesi.

114


6.3.2. Usage Based on ServiceThe usage of frequency canal which is also shown by the usage of frequency canal based on service has an increase compared to the previous year. This indication showed from the increase in the usage of several types of frequency canals which is quite high, such as fi xed service (public) and land mobile (public). Until the end of 2012, the total frequency usage based on service increased by 16.3% of the total usage of the previous year. This increase was higher than in 2011 which only increased by 3.9%. Frequency usage for satellite was still low compared to that in the previous year with the number of usage which was also not big.

The biggest percentage of increase in 2012 occurred in the usage for aeronautical service which increased up to 53.6% although the number of its usage was still low. This increase was far more than that in 2011 which only increased by 10.3%. The big increase also occurred in fi xed service (public) whose usage is the biggest compared to other services. Usage for this fi xed service increased by 24.2% or far more than that in 2011 which only increased by 6.6%. Big increase in 2012 also occurred in the usage for maritime service which achieved 25.2% after in 2011 precisely having a decline up to 16.6%. Other types of services did not show signifi cant increase. But, in this year of 2012, there was an increase of usage for all types of services, after in 2011 some types of services in fact declined, such as fi xed service (private), maritime and satellite

Figure 6.3. Composition of Frequency Usage according to Frequency Band per Province

115


Based on the usage of frequency canal up to December 2012, the composition of frequency canal usage until the end of 2012 showed that the biggest proportion was still for the usage of fi xed service (public), followed by the usage of frequency canal for land mobile (public). Up to this semester 2 of 2012, the proportion of usage of fi xed service (public) canal reached 65.3% or an increase from 2011 which was 61%, while for the usage of land mobile (public) canal which was the second biggest, its proportion of usage reached 21.8%, slightly decreased than the proportion of usage of the previous year which achieved 25.3%. As for the proportion of usage of other canals, it tended to be stable or had no signifi cant changes such as the proportion of usage of land mobile (Private) which only slightly decreased from 10.1% in 2011 to 9.3% in 2012. In other word, there is a shift occurred between the usage of fi xed service (public) and Land Mobile (public).

No. Service 2010 2011 2012

1 Aeronautical/Penerbangan 1,193 1,316 2,022 2 Broadcast (TV & Radio) 1,903 2,252 2,374 3 Fixed Service (private) 917 826 834 4 Fixed Service (public) 195,001 207,800 258,056 5 Land Mobile (Private) 32,979 34,445 36,906 6 Land Mobile (Public) 86,251 85,906 86,021 7 Maritime 8,104 6,759 8,464 8 Satellite 784 563 575 TOTAL 327,132 339,867 395,252

Table 6.4. Number of frequency canal usages according to service in 2010 –2012*

*) This is the data for calculation of ISR, not the data for the number of determined stations.

Satellite

Maritime

Land Mobile

Land Mobile

Fixed Service

Fixed Service

Broadcast (TV

Aeronautical

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

(Private)

(Private)

e (public)

e (private)

V & Radio)

20100.2%

2.5%

10.1%

10.1%

59.6%

0.3%

0.6%

0.4%

20110.2%

2.0%

10.1%

10.1%

61.1%

0.2%

0.7%

0.4%

20

2

% 9

% 9

% 6

0

0

0

20120.1%

2.1%

9.3%

9.3%

65.3%

0.2%

0.6%

0.5%

Figure 6.4. Composition of frequency usage according to service in 2010 – 2012

116


In the meantime, when viewed from the composition of frequency canal usage up to the type of its subservice until the end of 2012, it shows that the biggest usage was still in the group of Fixed Service which was 67.3% of all frequency canal usages throughout Indonesia or increased from 2011 which was only 62%. In this group, the majority was used for PP (public) subservice which achieved 94.7% of the total usage in said Fixed Service group. In other word, the proportion of PP subservice usage achieved 63.9% of the total frequency canal usages throughout Indonesia.

Meanwhile, the second biggest group of service is Land Mobile (Public) which covered 22.4% of the total frequency canal usages or decreased from the previous year which achieved 26%. The biggest proportion in Land Mobile (public) group was the usage for GSM/DCS subservice of 96.3%. Hence, the proportion of frequency canal usage for GSM/DCS subservice achieved 21.5% or decreased compared to that in 2011 which reached 25%. The third biggest group is Land Mobile (Private) (9.6%) the majority of which (97.7%) was used by standard subservice. These three subservices were the most widely used and dominated the frequency canal usages. The use for these three subservices achieved 94.8% of frequency canal usages, while usage for other subservices was very small in its proportion. Frequency canal usage for broadcast service comprising subservices of AM, FM, TV, and DVBT, their proportion was only 0.68%, due to their allocation and usages which were indeed limited.

Frequency Canal

Broadcast0.62%

AM

0.

077%

FM

0.37

8%

TV

0.16

%

DV

B-T

0.0

02%

Fixed Service67.29%

PMP

3.1

74%

PMP

Priv

ate

0.2

15%

PP

63.8

95%

PP P

riva

te

0.24

5%

Land Mobile (Private)9.59%

Pagi

ng

0.00

2%

Stan

dard

9.

369%

Taxi

0.

092%

Trun

gkin

g 0

.129

%

Land Mobil

e (Public).GSM/DCS 21.54

%

IS95

0.

766%

Trun

gkin

g 0

.051

%

Satellite0.15%

Eart

h Fi

xed

0.0

51%

Eart

h M

obile

0.

03%

Sate

llite

0

.001

%

VSA

T 0

.095

%

Figure 6.5. Composition of

Frequency Usage according to Service and

Subservice in2012

117


6.3.3. Usage According to ProvinceDistribution of usage of frequency canal subservice according to province also showed almost similar composition with the usage of frequency canal subservice nationally. In almost all provinces, the biggest usage of frequency canal was for three types of subservices in three diff erent service groups, i.e. PP (public) subservice in service group of Fixed Service, GSM/DCS subservice in service group of Land Mobile (Public) and Standard subservice in service group of Land Mobile (Private). The high use of mobile subservice found in all provinces was due to the increasing use of GSM frequency canal by the public through the use of cellular phone using GSM frequency which covered all layers of society and wider areas.

Distribution of frequency usage according to service also showed that the biggest frequency usage was found in the regions of Java with the biggest in West Java and East Java. Similar to the usage according to frequency band, regions with high usage of frequency service are characterized by large population, many urban areas, higher level of economic progress and development so that the dynamism of the region is also higher. DKI Jakarta became the third biggest user of frequency service even though it is the region with the highest level of development and economic progress and development and also the highest dynamism of society. This is because the broadness of the region is small so that the urban areas and the spread of dynamism of the society are also limited. In total, the proportion of frequency service usage in Java reached 52.5% with the proportion in West Java, East Java and DKI Jakarta were 116.4%, 11.3% and 9.37% respectively of the total usage of frequency service throughout Indonesia. Low usage of frequency service was also found in the provinces in the eastern part of Indonesia. The total proportion of frequency service usage in Maluku and Papua only reached 1.34%.

From the type of subservice that was mostly used, although in general PP (public) and GSM/DCS subservices became the most widely used subservice in each province, there was uniqueness in certain regions. For regions of Papua, Maluku and North Maluku, it was the usage of standard subservice which was the biggest and higher than the usage of PP (public) and GSM/DCS. The usage of Standard subservice in Papua was even prominent. This was allegedly due to special usage of Standard subservice in that region.

118


Table 6.5 Frequency Usage according to Provinces, Services, and Subservices up to December

2012 (unit: radio station transmitter)

Frequency usage according to service was still dominated by the usage in Java island. Proportion of spectrum usage according to service in Java achieved 52.5% of the total usage, while in Maluku-Papua region, its proportion was only 1.34% despite having wider area.

119


6.3.4. Pattern of Usage According to Island RegionsThe pattern of frequency service usage in each island territory shows a quite clear diff erence in the intensity of frequency service usage, particularly among Java, Sumatra and other island territories. The intensity of frequency service usage in Sumatra region is quite high although it is still lower than the intensity in Java. Similar to the previous year, the highest usages of frequency service are in North Sumatra and Riau especially for the type of fi xed service. These two regions have characteristics of many economic (business) activities and urban areas in those regions. The usage which is quite high also occurs in regions which are characterized by quite high intensity of business activities, namely South Sumatra and Lampung.

In the third group are Aceh and West Sumatra with the usage of slightly lower than Lampung. These two regions also have the same characteristics, namely wide area and many mountains, yet socio-economy dynamism of the society is also beginning to develop. Meanwhile, low usage is found in Bengkulu. Composition of usage according to type of service in this Sumatra region is relatively the same among those provinces. Nevertheless, the phenomenon on the usage of frequency service in Sumatra regions is a rather high usage of the type of Land Mobile (private) service especially in North Sumatra and Riau. The usage of this service type in North Sumatra and Riau is even close to the usage in the provinces using a total of big frequency service in Java.

The use of frequency service in Java Island shows an enormous amount and far much higher compared to other regions. This high usage occurs in all provinces except in DI Yogyakarta. This is because of the extent of urban areas in DI Yogyakarta which is relatively smaller despite having larger total area than that of DKI Jakarta. But, DI Yogyakarta has rural areas with socio-economic/business dynamism which is not too high. From the side of administrative area, in DI Yogyakarta province there is only one town with

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Satellite

Land Mobi

Land Mobi(private)Fixed Serv

ile (public)

ile

ice

Figure 6.6. Use of Frequency according to Service in Sumatra Regions

120


four districts. The biggest usage in this region of Java is also for the service type of Fixed Service and Land Mobile (public) with the usage of both types of service which is much higher than in provinces outside Java.

The biggest usage of frequency service in Java is particularly found in the provinces with many urban areas such as in West Java, Central Java and East Java, while for DKI Jakarta, although its area is not too wide, but it is the center of government administration and center of business and economic activities. DKI Jakarta also has very high socio-economic dynamism so that it has intensity of frequency usage which is high as well. However, the usage of the frequency type of Land Mobile (private) in Java Island is relatively small, almost the same as in some provinces in Sumatra. Even for the use of Satellite service type, its usage is very small and only suffi ciently seen in West Java and East Java.

Frequency usage in regions of Bali, Nusa Tenggara and Sulawesi shows low intensity of frequency service usage and lower than in Sumatra. Slightly high usage of frequency service only occurs in Bali and South Sulawesi for the service usage of Fixed Service and Land Mobile (public). The adequate usage of this frequency service is also seen occurring in regions which relatively have higher level of development progress and socio-economic dynamism.

Frequency service usage in other provinces in this region is relatively low. Even the very low intensity of frequency service usage is seen in Gorontalo. Particularly for East Nusa Tenggara, it has quite diff erent of service usage compared to other provinces in this region. The usage of Land Mobile (private) service type in East Nusa Tenggara is higher than that of Land Mobile (public) service type and also compared to the usage of land mobile (private) service

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

Banten

DKI Jakarta West Java Central Java

Satelli

Land M

Land M

Fixed S

Broad

DI Yogyakarta

te

Mobile (public)

Mobile (private

Service

cast

East Java

)

e)

Figure 6.7. Frequency Usage

according to Service in Java Regions

121


type in other regions. In Central Sulawesi, the diff erence of the number of usages of both types of service is not too big although it is still slightly bigger for service type of Land Mobile (public). There is no special explanation on the occurrence of the pattern of frequency usage which is slightly diff erent in Bali-Nusa Tenggara and Sulawesi.

Usage of frequency service in Kalimantan and Maluku-Papua regions shows a very diff erent condition. Usage of frequency service in Kalimantan region is quite high, even higher than that in Sulawesi region. Province with high frequency usage is mainly found in East Kalimantan. However, the usage of frequency service in Maluku and Papua is actually very low. This is in line with the level of progress and socio-economic dynamism which are relatively left behind in those regions. Usage of frequency service in North Maluku and West Papua as new provinces as the result of the provincial breaking up shows the lowest intensity of usage compared to that of other regions.

Pattern of frequency usage in Kalimantan and Maluku-Papua also shows a diff erence from the pattern occurring in most of other regions. The usage of Land Mobile (private) frequency service in these regions, especially in Maluku, North Maluku, Papua and East Kalimantan is higher than the usage of Land Mobile (public) frequency service. In South Kalimantan, the usage of Land Mobile (private) service type is also higher than land mobile (public). This is allegedly related to the number of mineral and coal mining activities in Kalimantan and Papua which may possibly need more Land Mobile (private) type of service especially for standard subservice.

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Satel

Land

Land

Fixed

Broa

llite

d Mobile (publi

d Mobile (priva

d Service

dcast

c)

te)

Figure 6.8. Frequency Usage according to Service in Bali, Nusa Tenggara and Sulawesi regions

122


6.4. Comparison of Radio Frequency Spectrum Usage with the Number of Population and the Vastness of Area.

Comparison of the use of radio frequency spectrum between provinces vis-à-vis the number of population and total area is done in order to know the deployment of the use and allocation of frequencies in an area appropriately. The usage of several types of frequency spectrums may be infl uenced by population density in the region. This means that for areas with high population density, the use of frequency spectrum will be even greater to serve the population, even though the territory is not widespread. As for other types of frequency spectrum, their use may possibly depend on the extent of territory. This means that for large areas, the use of the frequency service spectrum will increasingly be greater. Based on this information it is expected that in the future a policy for the allocation and usage of certain frequency can be prepared. In this section, comparison of the measurement of frequency usage is performed on some of the main subservices, i.e. frequencies of AM Radio, FM Radio, TV and GSM / DCS.

6.4. 1 AM Radio FrequencyThe usage of AM frequency shows that the highest intensity of AM frequency

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

South Kalimantan K

West alimantan

EKalim

East mantan

CentKalima

tral antan

Maluku

Satellite

Land Mobi

Land Mobi

Fixed Servi

Broadcast

u North Maluku

le (public)

le (private)

ce

West Papua

Papua

Figure 6.9. Frequency Usage according

to Service in Kalimantan,Maluku, and Papua regions

Composition of frequency usage according to service in Maluku-Papua and Kalimantan regions has diff erent pattern with other regions. In these regions, the usage of Land Mobile (private) is bigger than Land Mobile (public). High usage of land mobile (private) service mainly came from standard subservice type.

123


usage was in Java Island, namely in Central Java (51), West Java (46) and East Java (34), and then followed by North Sumatra (29). This number in fact is lower than the usage in 2011. The high usage of AM frequency in West Java, East Java and Central Java is in line with the large amount of population and numerous administrative areas in such regions, particularly those which have status town. The high usage of AM frequency in North Sumatra is also characterized by large population and numerous administrative areas (district/municipality) in addition to the development of the region which is relatively better. But, particularly for Jakarta, despite having large population and big urban areas, its AM frequency usage is not too big. This is allegedly because this region as a metropolitan city uses radio frequency band with higher frequency and better quality such as FM radio band.

In regions outside Java especially those which do not have many administrative areas or high level of development progress, they did not show high intensity of AM frequency usage. Intensity of AM frequency usage in Riau, Jambi, Bengkulu, Riau Islands and Bangka Belitung, for example, were only less than 5. Even in Bangka Belitung, AM frequency usage was still zero. The same condition occurred in Sulawesi and Maluku-Papua regions where in those regions only in South Sulawesi the usage of AM radio frequency was more than 10.

Level of usage in each province can be measured by the index of Usage per Vastness of Area (FPL) and index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP). FPL is defi ned as the number of frequency usages for every 10,000 km2 of area of the province, while FPP is defi ned as the number of frequency usages for every 1,000,000 population of the province. The average value of FPL index

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NAD

29

11

3 4

10

N. S

umat

ra

W. S

umat

raRi

auJa

mbi

SSu

mat

ra

0

3

10

1 0

S. S

umat

ra

Beng

kulu

Lam

pung

Riau

Isla

nds

Bang

ka B

elitu

ngB

58

4651

1

Bant

enDK

I Jak

arta

W. J

ava

C. Ja

va

DI Y

ogya

kart

a

34

94 2 4

E. Ja

va

Bali

W. N

usa

Teng

gara

E. N

usa

Teng

gara

S.Ka

liman

tan

13

2

1116

0

S. K

alim

anta

n W

. Kal

iman

tan

E. K

alim

anta

n C.

Kal

iman

tan

S. S

ulaw

esi

SE

Sl

i

0

61 0 1

S.E.

Sul

awes

i C.

Sul

awes

i N

. Sul

awes

i Go

ront

alo

Mal

uku

0 03

N. M

aluk

u W

. Pap

uaPa

pua

Figure 6.10A. Number of AM Frequency Usage in each Province

124


for AM Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 3.1 which means that there are 3.1 users for every 10,000 km2 of the vastness of the area of the province. With this reference, provinces that have index above the average are almost all provinces in Java, except DI Yogyakarta and Banten. Other provinces outside Java still have index below the average. Other province outside Java which have FPL above the average is North Sumatra. Provinces in Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Maluku and Papua regions also show small FPL index except South Sulawesi which achieved 2.5.

In the meantime, the average value of FPP index for AM Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 1.1, meaning there are 1.1 users for every 1,000,000 population of the province. With this reference, only provinces in Sumatra and small part of other regions that have FPP index above the average. In Sumatra region, only Riau, Riau Islands and Bangka Belitung which have FPP index below the average. But, in Java, only Central Java province which is above the average index. As for the Central-East part of Indonesia, provinces which are above the average of FPP index are West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, South Sulawesi and Central Sulawesi. Based on this FPP index value it can be seen that there is still potential of AM radio frequency usage in provinces with large enough population in Java.

6.4. 2 FM Radio FrequencyThe distribution pattern of FM frequency usage shows the same pattern of distribution with AM frequency usage. Regions with high intensity of FM frequency usage are those with quite large areas and have many administrative areas (district/municipality) which become the typical population separation administratively. Those regions with high intensity of FM frequency usage are

NAD Sumut

Sumbar RiauJamb

iSums

elBengkulu

Lampung KepriBabelBant

en

DKI Jakarta

Jawa Bara

t

Jawa Tengah

DI Yogyakart

a

Jawa Timu

rBali NTB NTT Kalse

lKalba

rKaltim

Kalteng

Sulsel

Sultra

Sulteng SulutGoro

ntaloMaluku

Maluku

Utara

Papua

Barat

Papua

Idx FPL 1. 4. 2. 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 1. 0. 5. 12 13 15 3. 7. 15 2. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

Idx FPP 2. 2. 2. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 1. 2. 0. 4. 1. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

Idx FPL

Idx FPP

Figure 6.10B. Index of Usage Per Vastness

of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for AM Frequency per Province

*) For DKI Jakarta, FPL Index in the above chart is multiplied by 10, to clarify the scale for other provinces

125


West Java, Central Java, East Java and North Sumatra. In fact, for regions in Java which have many administrative areas, the use of FM frequency achieved more than 100.

The highest FM frequency usage is found in Central Java (186), followed by West Java (175) and East Java (132). Meanwhile, outside Java Island, the high FM frequency usage was found in North Sumatra (104). Adequately high usage of FM frequency in Central-Eastern part of Indonesia is found in East Kalimantan (61) which even exceeded FM frequency usage in DKI Jakarta. FM frequency usage in Jakarta is only 42 despite having high socio-economic dynamism as center of business, government administration and entertainment.

The average value of FPL index for FM Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 19.5 meaning that there are 19.5 users for every 10,000 km2 of the vastness of area of the province. With this reference, provinces having the index above the average are almost all of provinces in Java and Bali Islands. The highest FPL index is found in DKI Jakarta as much as 63.3, followed by DI Yogyakarta as much as 127 and Bali (68). These three provinces have the same characteristics i.e. the areas which are not too wide, but they have large population and relatively high level of development. Meanwhile, other provinces outside Java and Bali Islands still have FPL index below the average, except in North Sulawesi. FPL index of FM frequency for Maluku and Papua regions is even very low. Meanwhile, the average value of FPP index for FM Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 8, which means that there are 8 users for every 1,000,000 population of the province. With this reference, there are quite

5

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

1

104

45 4126

5

50

18

49

18 2233

42

175186

400

132

3823

44 44433

61

24 30119 16

36

8 12

6 0

27

Figure 6.11A. Number of FM Frequency Usage in each Province.

126


many provinces which have index above the average. In Sumatra as well, almost all provinces are above the average index, except North Sumatra, Riau, South Sumatra and Lampung. However, in Java Island, only DI Yogyakarta which is above the average index. As for Central-Eastern part of Indonesia, quite many provinces are above the average FPP index. Only some provinces which are below the average, among other things, West Nusa Tenggara, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, Central Sulawesi, Gorontalo, Maluku, North Maluku, and West Papua. Based on this FPP index value, it can be seen that there is still potential for the usage of FM radio frequency in provinces with quite large number of population in Java Island.

6.4. 3 TV FrequencyThe usage of TV frequency spectrum (combination of Digital and analog TV) has been very rapidly grown in each province. Almost all provinces have at least 10 users of TV frequency spectrum. Only a few provinces which have less than 10 users spread out in Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi and eastern region of Indonesia. Provinces with the usage of TV frequency which is less than 10 are NAD, Bengkulu, Bangka-Belitung, West Nusa Tenggara, Gorontalo, Maluku, North Maluku and West Papua. TV frequency usage in Papua even reaches 26. The interesting thing is that none of the provinces in Kalimantan which has intensity of TV frequency usage less than 10. The lowest TV frequency usage is 18 in Central Kalimantan.

NADSumut

Sumbar

RiauJambi

Sumsel

Bengkul

u

Lampung

Kepri

Babel

Banten

DKI Jakarta

Jawa

Barat

Jawa

Tengah

DI Yogyakar

ta

Jawa

Timur

Bali NTB NTTKalsel

Kalbar

Kaltim

Kalteng

Sulsel

Sultra

Sulteng

Sulut

Gorontal

o

Maluku

Maluku

Utara

Papua

Barat

Papua

Idx FPL 8. 14 10 4. 5. 5. 9. 14 21 13 34 63 49 56 12 27 65 12 9. 11 2. 3. 1. 4. 5. 2. 26 7. 2. 1. 0. 0.

Idx FPP 11 7. 9. 6. 8. 6. 9. 6. 9. 17 2. 4. 3. 5. 11 3. 9. 4. 9. 11 7. 16 10 3. 8. 5. 15 7. 7. 5. 0. 8.

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

Idx FPL

Idx FPP

Figure 6.11B: Index of Usage Per Vastness

of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for FM Frequency per Province

FPP index for the usage of radio broadcast frequency (AM and FM) showed the intensity which is still below the average for most of the provinces in Java Island. This refl ects the potential audience which is still big enough in the territory of Java Island.


127


The average value of FPL index for TV Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 7.9, which means that there are 7.9 users for every 10,000 km2 of the vastness of area of the province. With this reference, provinces having index above the average are Riau Islands, DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Bali and North Sulawesi. Riau Islands, Bali, DI Yogyakarta and North Sulawesi have almost the same characteristics namely tourist destination areas. There seems to be correlation between this FPL index with tourism potential of the concerned provinces. This makes sense, because TV is an eff ective audio-visual media to communicate visual beauty which cannot be found in radio. The highest FPL index is found in Jakarta as much as 301, followed by DI Yogyakarta (44.7) and Bali (26).

Meanwhile, the average value of FPP index for TV Frequency usage in all provinces in Indonesia is 4.5, which means that there are 4.5 users for every 1,000,000 population of the province. With this reference, all provinces in Kalimantan and Sulawesi, except South Sulawesi, have already had FPP index above the average. This may possibly be due to the emerging of many local TV in the expanded regions which are rich with mineral/plantation products. The same condition occurs in the provinces of Sulawesi (South-east, Central and North Sulawesi). In the eastern region, North Maluku and Papua also have index above the average, whereas in Sumatra Island, Jambi, Riau Islands and Bangka-Belitung provinces have index above the average. FPP index which is above the average also because the population in those regions is not many.

9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

15

20 2119

30

0

8

1513

9111

20

44

33

14

47

15

9

14

27731 32

21

28

17

33

26

3

10

30

26

Figure 6.12A. Comparison of the Number of TV Frequency and the Number of Population and the Vastness of the Areas

128


On the other hand, all provinces in Java and Bali still have FPP index below the average. Although East Java and West Java are two provinces with the highest number of users, yet if compared with the number of their population, the FPP index of these two provinces is still below the average, namely 1.2 for East Java and 1 for West Java. This means that in East Java, there are only 1.2 users of TV frequency for every 1,000,000 population, while in West Java there is only 1 user of TV frequency for every 1,000,000 population. This refl ects the potential of TV broadcast customers which is still very big in both regions.

6.4.4. Distribution of the Use of ISR of TV and FM Canal for the Purpose of Broadcasting

Data presentation of distribution of ISR usage of TV and FM canal is intended to measure the level of utilization of the available frequency canal for each type of ISR canal in each region. Based on those data it will be known on which region the utilization of particular TV ISR canal still has the opportunity to be optimized. Particularly for TV canal, the level of utilization is focused on UHF TV canal because the master plan of the available TV canal allocation is for UHF TV canal. From the level of utilization of TV canal up to the end of 2012 as seen in Table 6.6, it still shows the low utilization in nearly most of provinces. This also shows that utilization of TV frequency canal in the region is still open by using the unused frequency canal. High level of utilization

NADSumut

Sumbar

RiauJambi

Sumsel

Bengkul

u

Lampung

Kepri

Babel

Banten

DKI Jakarta

Jawa

Barat

Jawa

Tengah

DI Yogyakar

ta

Jawa

Timur

Bali NTB NTTKalsel

Kalbar

Kaltim

Kalteng

Sulsel

Sultra

Sulteng

Sulut

Gorontal

o

Maluku

Maluku

Utara

Papua

Barat

Papua

Idx FPL 8. 14 10 4. 5. 5. 9. 14 21 13 34 63 49 56 12 27 65 12 9. 11 2. 3. 1. 4. 5. 2. 26 7. 2. 1. 0. 0.

Idx FPP 11 7. 9. 6. 8. 6. 9. 6. 9. 17 2. 4. 3. 5. 11 3. 9. 4. 9. 11 7. 16 10 3. 8. 5. 15 7. 7. 5. 0. 8.

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

Idx FPL

Idx FPP

Figure 6.12B. Index of Usage Per Vastness

of Area (FPL) and Index of Usage per Number of Population (FPP) for TV Frequency per Province

Intensity of TV broadcast frequency usage in Java island is still below the average of FPP index of 4.5 frequency users for every 1,000,000 population.


129


only occurred in DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta that reached 100%. This level of utilization is the same as the situation in 2011 where only two provinces had fully utilized their TV frequency canal, i.e. DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta. Regions which have quite high level of utilization are only Riau Islands and Bali which achieved 75% and 71.4% respectively. Some other regions in Java Island have level of utilization of above 60%, such as Banten, West Java and Central Java. Level of utilization of TV canal in DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta which is already maximum is because of its allocation which is not large and the vastness of the area of those regions which is not wide. Meanwhile, TV frequency usage in these two regions is quite high because DKI Jakarta is the center of government administration and business, while Yogyakarta is tourism area and center of creative industry.

From fi gure 6.13 it is also seen that low utilization of TV frequency canal is found in NAD which is still below 10%, and, East Nusa Tenggara, North Sumatra. North Maluku and Gorontalo which are less than 20%. Meanwhile, in West Sumatra, Riau, Bengkulu, Lampung, West Nusa Tenggara, South Sulawesi, Maluku and Papua, the level of utilization is also still less than 30%. In some regions, low level of utilization is because of its allocation is large and the vastness of the area is wide, while level of usage is not too high even though it is still higher than other regions. As for other regions, they have small level of utilization because the usage of TV frequency in those areas is also still low. Those regions are characterized by the level of development progress which is relatively left behind, or large areas, slow economic development or are expanded regions so that investment in TV frequency utilization is still insuffi cient. This is allegedly also related to market potential of television

No Province Available Amount

Used Amount Utilization No Province Available

Amount Used

Amount Utilization

1 NAD 97 9 9.3% 17 Bali 21 15 71.4% 2 North Sumatra 90 15 16.7% 18 West Nusa Tenggara 34 9 26.5% 3 West Sumatra 77 20 26.0% 19 East Nusa Tenggara 96 14 14.6% 4 Riau 84 21 25.0% 20 West Kalimantan 68 31 45.6% 5 Jambi 63 19 30.2% 21 Central Kalimantan 46 21 45.7% 6 Bangka Belitung 28 9 32.1% 22 East Kalimantan 90 32 35.6% 7 Bengkulu 35 8 22.9% 23 South Kalimantan 56 27 48.2% 8 South Sumatra 63 30 47.6% 24 South Sulawesi+ West Sulawesi 128 28 21.9% 9 Lampung 60 15 25.0% 25 Central Sulawesi 61 33 54.1%

10 Riau Islands 16 12 75.0% 26 South east Sulawesi 42 17 40.5% 11 Banten 17 11 64.7% 27 North Sulawesi 42 26 61.9% 12 DKI Jakarta 14 14 100.0% 28 Gorontalo 21 3 14.3% 13 West Java 69 43 62.3% 29 Maluku 41 10 24.4% 14 Central Java 55 33 60.0% 30 North Maluku 21 3 14.3% 15 DI Yogyakarta 14 14 100.0% 31 Papua 91 26 28.6% 16 East Java 84 46 54.8% 32

Table 6.6. Utilization of TV Canals According to Provinces.

130


broadcasting industry in those regions, so that they are less attractive for players of national as well as local TV broadcasting industry to invest for developing activities of TV broadcasting in those regions. In regions of Sumatra which have quite high canal allocation such as North Sumatra and Riau, the level of their utilization is still low, below 20%., while in Sulawesi, phenomenon of regions with large frequency allocation yet low level of utilization is seen in South Sulawesi.

For the use of FM radio frequency canals, Table 6.7. shows high level of FM frequency usage in DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta. In those two provinces where the available FM canal allocation is not large, their utilization is already high enough, namely achieving more than 90%, even for DKI Jakarta, it achieves 100%. Relatively high level of utilization for FM radio frequency canal is also found in regions in Java with level of utilization above 50% except in Banten and East Java, although the available canal allocation in those regions is quite large. In West Java and Central Java, with canal allocation of 312 and 331, the level of utilization reaches 56%. In East Java, with the largest FM frequency allocation in Java, its level of utilization only reaches 36.1%, higher than the utilization in the previous year.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Figure 6.13. Level of utilization of TV frequency canal according to provinces

131


The reverse condition occurred in regions outside Java where the level of utilization of FM frequency canals is still very low. This low level of utilization occurs both in the area with large frequency canal allocation and in the area with small number of frequency canal allocation. In regions outside Java-Bali, the level of utilization of FM frequency canal is less than 20% except in North Sumatra, Riau Islands, Lampung and South Kalimantan. In these four provinces the level of utilization of FM frequency achieves respectively 23.5% in North Sumatra, 30.5% in Riau Islands, 22.6% in Lampung and 22.7% in South Kalimantan. Compared with DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta, this level of utilization is still far lower. However, the low level of utilization of FM radio frequency in North Sumatra is also due to the location provided was quite large. Compared to 2011, in general there is an increase of level of utilization of FM frequency in all regions.

In other regions with big allocation of FM frequency canal such as NAD, East Nusa Tenggara, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi and Papua, the level of utilization of FM frequency canal up to 2012, was still very low, namely from 0% (West Papua), 3.6% (North Maluku) to 18.6% (South Sulawesi)). The same thing also happened in areas with low allocation of FM frequency canals such as Riau Islands, Bengkulu, West Nusa Tenggara and Gorontalo where the level of frequency utilization was also not big. Although the allocation of FM frequency canals in those areas was small, yet the level of utilization was still low, namely below 20%, except in Riau Islands, because the usage was also low. This indicates that the area with high population density and relatively advanced also shows that the level of utilization and the density of the use of FM frequency canals are high.

Table 6.7. Utilization of FM Radio Canal According to Provinces

No Province Available Amount

Used Amount

Utiliza-tion No Province Available

Amount Used

Amount Utiliza-tion

1 NAD 434 51 11.8% 17 Bali 87 38 43.7% 2 North Sumatra 443 104 23.5% 18 West Nusa Tenggara 153 23 15.0% 3 West Sumatra 325 45 13.8% 19 East Nusa Tenggara 410 44 10.7% 4 Riau 391 41 10.5% 20 West Kalimantan 427 33 7.7% 5 Riau Islands 59 18 30.5% 21 Central Kalimantan 295 24 8.1% 6 Jambi 242 26 10.7% 22 East Kalimantan 328 61 18.6% 7 Bangka Belitung 139 22 15.8% 23 South Kalimantan 194 44 22.7% 8 Bengkulu 144 18 12.5% 24 South Sulawesi+ West Sulawesi 522 30 5.7% 9 South Sumatra 300 50 16.7% 25 Central Sulawesi 305 16 5.2% 10 Lampung 217 49 22.6% 26 South East Sulawesi 243 19 7.8% 11 Banten 76 33 43.4% 27 North Sulawesi 194 36 18.6% 12 DKI Jakarta 42 42 100.0% 28 Gorontalo 104 8 7.7% 13 West Java 312 175 56.1% 29 Maluku 227 12 5.3% 14 Central Java 331 186 56.2% 30 North Maluku 168 6 3.6% 15 DI Yogyakarta 42 40 95.2% 31 West Papua 195 0 0.0% 16 East Java 366 132 36.1% 32 Papua 500 27 5.4%

132


6.4.5. GSM FrequencyThe pattern of distribution of GSM frequency usage shows a slightly diff erent pattern with the distribution of broadcast frequency usage particularly FM and AM radio. High intensity of GSM frequency usage is not only found in the provinces with many administrative areas, but also aff ects by geographical condition and the level of economic progress and also the dynamism of the society. The highest usage of GSM frequency spectrum is found in provinces in Java, namely West Java, followed by East Java and Central Java. DKI Jakarta, although the vastness of its area is relatively small and has only a few administrative areas compared to other provinces, but ranked the fourth highest in term of the number of GSM frequency users. Regions outside Java with high intensity of frequency usage are North Sumatra and Riau. These two provinces have characteristics of relatively high level of progress compared to other regions. Meanwhile, regions in the eastern part of Indonesia except South Sulawesi have low intensity of GSM frequency usage (less than 1,000).

Some regions with areas which are not too large yet have higher level of development and high density of population such as DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta and Bali, have GSM frequency usage which tend to be high despite having small areas. If GSM frequency usage in these regions is compared to the extent of the areas, it implicitly refl ects the presence of BTS for GSM which has already been in the level of very crowded situation where the usage of one GSM frequency (1 BTS tower) only covers an area which is not too vast. The usage of one GSM frequency in Yogyakarta only covers an area of 1.8 km2 and in Bali 2.35 km2. In fact, in Jakarta one GSM frequency only covers an area of less than 0.1 km2.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

NAD

N. S

umat

raW

. Sum

atra

Riau

Riau

Isla

nds

Jam

biBa

ngka

Bel

itung

Beng

kulu

S. S

umat

raLa

mpu

ngBa

nten

DKI J

akar

taW

. Jav

aC.

Java

DI Y

ogya

kart

aE

JE.

Java Ba

liW

. Nus

a Te

ngga

raE.

Nus

a Te

ngga

raW

. Kal

iman

tan

C. K

alim

anta

nE

Kalim

anta

nE.

Kal

iman

tan

S. K

alim

anta

nS.

Sul

awes

i+W

. Sul

awes

iC.

Sul

awes

iS.

E. S

ulaw

esi

N. S

ulaw

esi

Goro

ntal

o

Mal

uku

N. M

aluk

u W

. Pap

uaPa

pua

Figure 6.14. Level of utilization

of FM frequency canal according to

Provinces

133


This density increases compared to that of the previous year which shows the intensity of GSM frequency usage which is getting higher. Therefore, FPL index unit for GSM frequency usage is diff erentiated, i.e. the number of GSM frequency users for every 100 km2 of the vastness of the related province.

The average value of FPL index for GSM frequency usage in all provinces of Indonesia is 13, which means there are 13 users for the area of every 100 km2 of the province. With this reference, provinces having index above the average were only those in Java and Bali plus Riau Islands. FPL index of GSM frequency in Riau Islands is only slightly above the average, i.e. 18.6. However, this parameter of averaging may not be proper to become the reference considering the value of FPL index of Jakarta province which is far above other provinces.

The vastness of the area does not stimulate yet the increase in GSM frequency usage so that the comparison of GSM frequency usage vis-à-vis the vastness of the area becomes lower. In some provinces with vast areas such as Papua, East Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan, the GSM frequency usage is still low, even much lower than other regions that have smaller areas. The market potential factor refl ected by the number of population and income level refl ected by the level of progress of the regions become the consideration of operators in using GSM frequency in a region.

The FPP index defi nition for GSM frequency usage is also diff erentiated as follows: the number of GSM frequency users for every 10,000 inhabitants of

2,142

5,650

2,

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

NAD

N. S

umat

ra

0

094

3,942

1,124

2,263

554

2,602

1,3

W. S

umat

raRi

auJa

mbi

S. S

umat

raBe

ngku

luLa

mpu

ngRi

Il

d

347646

3,575

7,215

12,272

8,611

1,7

Riau

Isla

nds

Bang

ka B

elitu

ngBa

nten

DKI J

akar

taW

. Jav

aC.

Java

DIY

kt

772

10,603

2,4611,602

7131,3201,6

DI Y

ogya

kart

aE.

Java Ba

liW

. Nus

a Te

ngga

raE.

Nus

a Te

ngga

raS.

Kal

iman

tan

WKa

liman

tan

6172,198

1,121

2,304

56063393

W. K

alim

anta

nE.

Kal

iman

tan

C. K

alim

anta

nS.

Sul

awes

iS.

E. S

ulaw

esi

C. S

ulaw

esi

NSu

law

esi

3714525082 48

476

N. S

ulaw

esi

Goro

ntal

o M

aluk

uN

. Mal

uku

W. P

apua

Papu

a

Figure 6.15A. Comparison of the Number of GSM Frequency with the Number of Population and the Vastness of Area

134


the concerned province. The average value of FPP index for GSM frequency usage in all provinces of Indonesia is 3.6, which means that there are 3.6 users for every 10,000 inhabitants of the province. With this reference, some provinces in Sumatra Island have already owned above average index value, i.e. NAD, North Sumatra, West Sumatra, Riau, Riau Islands, and Bangka-Belitung. Meanwhile, in Java Island, due to the high number of population, only DKI Jakarta and DI Yogyakarta that have above average of FPP index. Other provinces that have above average of FPP index are Bali, East Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan, and North Sulawesi.

6.5. Issuance of Radio Amateur License (IAR) and License for Inter-Inhabitant Radio Communication (IKRAP)

One of the regulations in frequency usage by stakeholders is through the issuance of license for radio frequency usage. There are three types of licenses/certifi cates issued, i.e. License for Radio Amateur (IAR), License for Inter-Inhabitant Radio Communication (IKRAP), and Certifi cate of Qualifi cations for Radio Amateur (SKAR). Implicitly, the number of licenses/certifi cates related to this radio management refl ects the occurrence of frequency usage.

During the year 2012, 8292 licenses of Radio Amateurs (IAR) were issued throughout Indonesia. This number is decreased by 21.4% compared to the issuance of IAR for one year in 2011 which achieved 10423. Meanwhile, for IKRAP, up to December 2012, 6663 licenses were issued. This number of IKRAP issued during the year 2012 had even exceeded the number of IKRAP

NADSumut

Sumbar

RiauJambi

Sumsel

Bengkul

u

Lampung

Kepri

Babel

Banten

DKI Jakarta

Jawa

Barat

Jawa

Tengah

DI Yogyakar

ta

Jawa

Timur

Bali NTB NTTKalsel

Kalbar

Kaltim

Kalteng

Sulsel

Sultra

Sulteng

Sulut

Gorontal

o

Maluku

Maluku

Utara

Papua

Barat

Papua

Idx FPL 3. 7. 5. 4. 2. 2. 2. 7. 16 3. 37 10 34 26 56 22 42 8. 1. 3. 1. 1. 0. 3. 1. 1. 6. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.

Idx FPP 4. 4. 4. 6. 3. 2. 3. 3. 7. 5. 3. 7. 2. 2. 5. 2. 6. 3. 1. 3. 3. 5. 4. 2. 2. 2. 4. 1. 1. 0. 0. 1.

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Idx FPLIdx FPP

Figure 6.15B. Usage Index Per

Vastness of Area (FPL) and

Usage Index Per Number of

Population (FPP) for GSM Frequency

Per Province

135


issued during the year 2011 which were only 2715 or increased by 145.4%. As for the license type of SKAR, during the year 2012 6855 SKAR licenses were issued or increased by 30.2% compared to the issuance in 2011. Implicitly, this shows the more dynamic the growth of frequency usage by the society which is refl ected by the issuance of IKRAP and SKAR which was quite signifi cant in 2012. On the other hand, IAR in fact experienced a decrease.

The number of licenses for radio management according to provinces in 2012 occurred mostly in Java Island with the most number in West Java, Central Java, and East Java in line with the usage of radio frequency which was also high in these regions. The issuance of this radio management licenses was also high in DKI Jakarta despite having smaller area as shown in the diagram in Figure 6.16. This is related to many activities which use radio frequency in Jakarta for various purposes. The issuance of license related to radio operation shows a variety of patterns and diff ers between regions among the three types of licenses/certifi cates issued. Radio Amateur License (IAR) becomes the most issued license for regions in Java Island and is much more than the issuance of IKRAP in those regions. But, particularly for Banten, the issuance of IKRAP actually is far more than the issuance of IAR or SKAR. This pattern that occurs in Banten is the same as in Lampung, Riau, West Kalimantan and East Kalimantan where IKAP issuance is far more than the two other types of licenses.

In some regions outside Java, IAR also becomes the most issued license compared to other licenses. In some regions in Sumatra such as Bengkulu and South Sumatra, IAR is also more than other licenses, but the volume of its issuance is still small. The diff erence also occurs in eastern part of Indonesia, namely Maluku-Papua. In four provinces of these regions, the issuance of SKAR license was in fact far more than the other two licenses. This is related to the commencement of skill certifi cation encouragement for users of amateur radio frequency whose usage starts to be numerous in these regions. The same composition also occurs in South Sulawesi where the issuance of SKAR licenses is far more than the issuance of IAR and IKRAP.

For the type of IKRAP license, quite high volume of its issuance is found in West Java, followed by West Sumatra. In West Sumatra, the issuance IKRAP is even much higher than IAR. Meanwhile, for SKAR, it is mostly issued in East Java, DKI Jakarta and South Sulawesi. In some regions, such as in Bengkulu, Bangka Belitung, East Kalimantan, North Maluku, Papua and West Papua, SKAR becomes the most issued license compared to two other types of licenses.

136


If seen from its composition according to big island/s, there is similar pattern in the case of the highest proportion of issuance which is the issuance of IAR, except in Maluku-Papua regions, where the proportion of SKAR issuance is higher. The high issuance of SKAR in South Sulawesi Province makes the pattern of composition in Sulawesi island similar to Bali-Nusa Tenggara, where the issuance of SKAR achieved around 47%. In the meantime, Maluku-Papua has diff erent composition with other regions where the issuance of SKAR is very prominent, achieving 54% of the total licenses issued.

Figure 6.16. Spread of the issuance

of radio amateur license according to type of

license and province

137


From the side of license distribution among big islands according to the types of licenses, the biggest proportion is, in general, still in Java Island since Java still becomes the centre of activities in various fi elds in Indonesia, including broadcasting. For IAR and IKRAP, their issuance is concentrated in Java Island. In fact, for IKRAP, its proportion in Java Island achieved 56.7%, while Maluku-Papua achieved only 4.7%. This is because radio amateur usage is still more concentrated in Java Island. For IAR, its proportion of issuance in Java regions is quite big, achieving 42.3%, while in Sumatra only 18.2%. Meanwhile, SKAR shows distribution pattern which is relatively more distributed than other types of licenses with the distribution in Java Island was only 33% of all SKAR licenses issued. But, the proportion on other big islands is quite spread out, within the range of 12% - 17%. Even in Maluku-Papua, it reached 14.2% and in Bali also achieved 12% of all certifi cates issued.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

S

SKAR

IKRAP

IAR

Sumatra Java

23.1% 23.9%

36.5% 39.7%

40.5% 36.4%

a Bali+Nusa Tenggara

% 47.8%

% 16.2%

% 36.0%

Kalimantan Su

31.4% 4

24.6%

44.0% 4

ulawesi MalukuPapua

46.9% 54.0%

13.0% 17.3%

40.1% 28.6%

u+ a

%

%

%

Figure 6.17. Proportion of Certifi cates Issued based on their Types according to Big Islands

Maluku-Pa

Sulawesi

Kalimanta

Bali-Nusa

Jawa

Sumatera

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

apua

1

an 1

Tenggara

4

1

IAR6.3%

11.7%

14.0%

7.6%

42.3%

18.2%

IKRAP4.7%

4.7%

9.6%

4.2%

56.7%

20.2%

SKAR14.2%

16.4%

11.9%

12.0%

33.1%

12.4%

Figure 6.18. Distribution of radio amateur certifi cates in big Islands of Indonesia

138


6.6. Certifi cation of Radio Operator

Besides regulation being done as regards to radio frequency usage through license mechanism for frequency users, monitoring instrument and regulation on radio frequency usage are also done through certifi cation toward operators from the user side There are two types of instruments used namely certifi cation of Radio Electronics and Radio Operator (REOR) and Certifi cation of Radio Operator Profi ciency (SKOR). These two instruments are performed through education and state examination carried out in order to obtain passing grade with a view to showing feasibility and legitimacy as radio operator.

6.6.1. Certifi cation of Radio Electronics and Radio Operator (REOR)During 2012, 32 state examinations of REOR were held which were attended by 2468 participants. The number of REOR examination provision in this year of 2012 increased by 23.1% compared to the previous year, but the number of participants decreased by 11% compared to the previous year. The examination was done in fi ve cities, i.e. Jakarta, Semarang, Makassar, Surabaya and Batam. The cities where the REOR examinations were conducted in 2012 are the same as in 2011.

From the distribution of participants according to examination sites, most of the REOR examination participants were still found in Jakarta, achieving 57.5% of the total participants during the year of 2012 or decreased compared to that in 2011 which achieved 70%. The decline in the proportion of examination participants in Jakarta is followed by the increase of participants in other examinations regions which was quite big. Other four cities which conducted REOR examination have almost the same increase of proportion, namely around 3% - 4%.

Town 2010 2011 Semester 1- 2012

Participant Graduate Participant Lulus Peserta Lulus

Jakarta* 1098 479 1954 1500 1420 1214

Semarang 847 326 358 302 434 366

Makassar 214 95 144 129 211 196

Surabaya 364 175 109 76 156 138

Batam 0 0 219 148 247 190

Table 6.8. Participants and

Graduates of REOR in 2010 – 2012

*) including Tangerang

139


The level of graduation of REOR examination participants in 2012 achieved 853%. This achievement of graduation 2012 was higher than the graduation level during one year in 2010 which only achieved 42.6% and in 2011 which only achieved 77.4%. Figure 6.19 shows that the highest level of graduation of REOR examination in the implementation of REOR examination is the same as in 2011, namely in Makassar which achieved 92.6% or increased by 3% compared to that of the previous year. But, if seen from the increase of graduation level from 2011 to 2012, the biggest increase precisely occurs in Surabaya and Batam. Level of graduation of REOR examination in Surabaya which in 2011 only achieved 69.1%, increased to 88.5% in 2012, while in Batam, level of graduation of REOR examination also increased from 67.6% in 2011 to 76.9% in 2012.

The level of graduation of REOR examination in Jakarta whose participants were the most, achieved 85.5%. This achievement of graduation in Jakarta is also higher than in 2010 and 2011 which only achieved 43.6% and 76.8% respectively. Only level of graduation of REOR examination implementation in Semarang which decreased, but only by 0.1%. Hence, in total, the level of graduation of REOR examination in 2012 is better than in 2011.

6.6.2. Certifi cation of Radio Operator Profi ciency (SKOR)The Examination of certifi cation of Radio Operator Profi ciency (SKOR) until end of 2012 was just held 13 times. This number underwent a sharp increase compared to that of 2010 (six times) or 2011 (only 6 times). SKOR examination in 2012 was held in 7 cities, i.e. Batam, Mataram, Jakarta, Palembang, Samarinda, Bontang and Ternate. In this semester 2 of 2012, the

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Jakarta*

Semarang

Makassar

Surabaya

Batam

20143.6

g 38.5

44.4

48.1

106%

5%

4%

1%

201176.8%

84.4%

89.6%

69.7%

67.6%

201285.5%

84.3%

92.9%

88.5%

76.9%

Figure 6.19. Comparison of the Level of REOR Graduation According toOrganizing Towns in 2010 - 2012

140


SKOR examination was held every month in some cities, while in semester 1 of 2012 it was only held in January, May, and June. The increase in the frequency of these examinations is also followed by the increase in the number of participants in each town. Total participants of SKOR examination in 2012 only achieved 464 participants or increased by 257% compared to that in 2011. The number of examination participants in 2012 is also bigger than in 2010 which was only 299 participants. This increase is the result of improvement eff ort of SKOR certifi cation scheduling which is adjusted to the working hour of operators, awareness eff ort of the importance of certifi cation for radio operators, and the process of taking the examination which is simplifi ed.

From the side of the level of graduation of SKOR examination as shown in fi gure 6.20, an increase of the level of graduation occurred in the implementation of SKOR examination in 2012. The level of graduation of SKOR examination in s2012 achieved 96.8%, increasing compared to the level of graduation in 2010 and 2011 which achieved only 92.3% and 94.6% respectively. This increase is particularly coming from the achievement of SKOR examinations in Mataram and Jakarta whose level of graduation achieved 100%, while the level of graduation of SKOR examination in East Kalimantan (Bontang and Samarinda) also achieved more than 95%. The level of graduation of SKOR examination in Batam in fact experienced a decrease after achieving 92.5% in 2010 and 83.7% in 2011, but only 76.7% in 2012.

Town 2010 2011 2012

Participant Graduate Participant Lulus Peserta Lulus Batam 120 111 43 36 30 23

Pekanbaru 84 76 0 0 0 0

Denpasar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Balikpapan 0 0 53 53 0 0

Mataram 0 0 34 34 57 57

Banjarmasin 30 24 0 0 0 0

Jakarta 65 65 0 0 87 87

Palembang 0 0 0 0 79 76

Samarinda 0 0 0 0 103 100

Bontang 0 0 0 0 52 52

Ternate 0 0 0 0 56 54

TOTAL 299 276 130 123 464 449

Table 6.9. SKOR

Participants and Graduates

in 2010 – 2012

141


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Batam

Pekanbar

Denpasar

Kaltim

Mataram

Banjarma

Jakarta

Palemban

Ternate

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

29

u 9

r

sin 8

10

ng

201092.5%

90.5%

80.0%

00.0%

2083.7

100.

100.

117%

.0%

.0%

201276.7%

98.1%

100.0%

100.0%

96.2%

96.4%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Figure 6.20. Comparison of SKOR Graduation Level according to organizing town in 2010 – 2012

142


143


7CHAPTER

144


145


The controlling activity of resources and information technology equipment is conducted to monitor and control the use of radio frequency spectrum (frequency) by various parties, including taking action against violation of the use of frequency or tool and equipment of post and information technology. The control is made by the use of spectrum management information system equipment, radio frequency spectrum monitoring equipment. In accordance with Ministerial Regulation Number 3 Year 2011 regarding Organization Management of Technical Implementation Unit in the Field of Frequency Spectrum Monitor, the implementation of radio frequency monitoring becomes the main task of Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) which spread out over 37 locations, conducted in line with the work program of UPT, with coordination and follow up by Directorate General of Resources and Postal and Information Technology Equipment (SDPPI). The monitoring activity is done for the purpose of monitoring, planning, determining, licensing (new license, extended license and warehousing license) and orderly use of radio frequency spectrum. The said implementation of activity is as follows:1. UPT through frequency control offi cer conducts observation and

monitoring of band/frequency intended or in accordance with the work program of the Year 2012 by using radio frequency monitoring facility which is available and has the functions of observation, measurement, and detection of emission.

CONTROL OF RESOURCES AND EQUIPMENT

CHAPTER 7

146


2. From such monitoring activity, monitored frequency result is obtained, then, such monitored frequency data is identifi ed and compared with data from Radio Station Licensing (ISR) which is located at Management Information System (SIMS) of SDPPI.

3. For such identifi cation result, the fi ndings of frequency spectrum emission can be classifi ed as: a) Frequency which has license (ISR) and in accordance with the

allocation and technical characteristics of the license.b) Frequency which has license (ISR) but not in accordance with the

allocation and technical characteristics of the license.c) Frequency which does not have license (ISR), or referred to as illegal

frequency.4. Result of data which has been identifi ed will further be followed up by

control stage in the fi eld where illegal monitoring result (does not have ISR) becomes the target of operation, however, not all monitoring result would become the target of the whole operation considering the limited cost and time of the control at the work program of UPT. The remaining monitoring result with illegal status (not licensed) will be made the object of coaching simultaneously through the socialization program of radio frequency usage in the respective work territory of UPT.

Besides monitoring frequency usage, the controlling activity is also conducted by monitoring the use of equipment by various activities of utilization of postal and information technology resources. Monitoring is conducted in relation with the conformity with the regulation or the worthiness of the equipment used. Statistics in this chapter also presents the condition and performance of Technical Implementation Unit (UPT) of monitoring and frequency as the spearhead in monitoring and controlling activities of equipment and frequency usage. Monitoring on the condition and performance of this UPT is crucial to ensure that the UPT performs its task and function of monitoring the equipment and utilization of frequency properly.

7.1. Scope of Data Presentation

The scope of data presentation in the fi eld of control of resources and equipment is divided into the activity of radio frequency control carried out by UPT in the Field of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring Sector (Offi ce/Shop/Post) and postal and information technology equipment control which will be described in this chapter. Data presentation of the Control of Resources

147


and Equipment of Post and Information Technology is the manifestation of frequency arrangement by Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology as regulator. The arrangement and structuring of frequency are made to avoid interference either between systems or between users in a system. The arrangement and structuring of frequency are also made for the purpose of effi ciency of frequency spectrum usage so that there is no waste in its usage. Data shown in the statistics of Control of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology includes:1) Monitoring of the law enforcement of radio frequency spectrum usage

in 2012;2) Action taken against violation of radio frequency spectrum usage in

2012;3) Findings of radio frequency spectrum disturbances in 2012;4) Monitoring and law enforcement against the use of equipment of Post

and Information Technology in semester 2 of 2012 and in 2012 as a whole;

5) Conditions of the respective UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring in semester 2 of 2012.

7.2. Concept and Defi nition

Some concepts and defi nitions contained in the data presentation about the Control of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology are as follows:• Radio Frequency Spectrum is the arrangement of radio frequency bands

which has frequency of less than 300 GHz as a unit of electromagnetic wave vibration that propagates and presents in the aerospace (air space and outer space);

• Equipment of post and information technology is various kinds of equipment and tools used for the activity of post, telecommunication and information technology, which have to go through the process of standard testing to be used in the legal jurisdiction of Indonesia.

• Monitoring and control are the activities of supervising and controlling the use of frequency and equipment of post and information technology by various parties carried out through direction and arrangement to ensure the security and to avoid any disturbances in their use.

• Monitored: is radio frequency which has been successfully monitored through monitoring activities available at UPT such as routine monitoring,

148


monitoring on demand, monitoring of special/important event, and monitoring of radio disturbances.

• Identifi ed: is monitored frequency whose user has been successfully identifi ed through the stages of observation, validation, measurement, detection of emission sources based on types of Service Class, Station Class and the emission used.

• Legal: is identifi ed frequency which is known to have license in accordance with its allocation, based on the licensing document owned and SIMS database.

• Illegal: is identifi ed frequency which is known to have no license of usage based on database verifi cation/validation.

• Not in line (with its allocation/ISR): is frequency which is used with license but in its operation is not in line with the characteristics/parameter set in its ISR.

• Advance Monitored (still being monitored): is monitored frequency whose user has not been identifi ed due to operational technical reason of related radio station and readiness of monitor equipment condition at the time the equipment is used.

• Expired License: is violation of the use of frequency which has license but time limit of its usage has not been extended.

• Confi scated: is the act of securing radio communication equipment which is operated without license (illegal).

• Sealed: is the act of securing illegal radio equipment by means of wrapped up and sealed on location.

• Warned: is action by giving written warning to radio frequency users who commit violation.

• Amount: is total amount of violations and actions taken from a radio frequency control operation.

UPT of Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring as one of working units supporting the controlling activity of resources and equipment of post and information technology has main function to conduct monitoring of frequency usage and frequency radio equipment by various parties within the framework of controlling the proper use of frequency. This function is performed by the existence of monitoring units in the regions in the form of monitoring offi ces, shops (loka) and posts of various levels. There are 37 UPT of monitoring frequency (Monfrek) spread over throughout Indonesia. Those UPT which spread over 37 locations regularly conduct the activity of monitoring and law enforcement of frequency usage and the existence of the equipment used in the utilization of radio frequency. Particularly for

149


equipment monitoring and law enforcement activity, not all UPT perform the same type of monitoring and law enforcement activity.

7.3. Monitoring and Law Enforcement of Frequency and Telecommunication Equipment

One of the tasks and functions of working unit at the Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (SDPPI) related to the use of frequency equipment of post and information technology by the public is conducting monitoring and law enforcement. Monitoring and law enforcement are conducted on the use of frequency resources and equipment related to legal aspects of usage, license ownership and conformance of the equipment used with the prevailing regulations. Monitoring is done through the existence of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring located in 37 towns throughout Indonesia. Two newly established UPT are UPT Mamuju and UPT Manokwari have not submitted monitoring activity conducted, considering there has not been any monitoring activity done in 2012.

From monitoring activity done during 2012, UPT which submitted monitoring result report found the use and or disturbance in frequency usage. Monitoring result is classifi ed based on its status, i.e. indication of frequency usage, usage status, and follow-up monitoring done.

The result of monitoring conducted during 2012 is shown in UPT monitoring result recapitulation table in table 7.1. The result of monitoring in all UPT shows that there were 8524 monitored activities with the fi ndings of the highest monitored activities were in UPT Mataram and UPT Makassar which achieved 1501 and 1330 fi ndings respectively.

Several other UPT with the amount of monitored fi ndings achieving more than 1000 were UPT Lampung and UPT Yogyakarta. In the meantime, for some big UPT such as UPT Bandung, UPT DKI Jakarta, UPT Semarang and UPT Surabaya in fact only had a few monitored usage or disturbances, i.e. less than 50 monitored fi ndings except at UPT Jakarta which achieved 126 fi ndings. Even UPT Semarang only had 11 monitored fi ndings.

150


From monitored activity, as many as 8144 activities identifi ed as frequency usage or around 95.54% of the monitored activity. In most of UPT which performed monitoring activity, the majority identifi ed the presence of 100% frequency usage activity. Further, from frequency usage activities identifi ed, 6667 activities or 81.86% were legal activities. Meanwhile, 1403 or 17.23% were illegal frequency usage activities. Based on that condition, it is seen that the discipline level in frequency usage is quite high, i.e. achieving 81.86%.

Some UPT will perform advance monitoring activity particularly in the area where a lot of frequency usage activities identifi ed such as in UPT Yogyakarta

No

AREA OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

MONITORING

Monitored Identified Legal Illegal Not in line

Further Monitoring

1 UPT NAD 768 768 690 73 5 0 2 UPT MEDAN 20 20 18 0 2 0 3 UPT PADANG 474 473 450 14 9 1 4 UPT PEKANBARU 103 62 53 4 5 41 5 UPT JAMBI 210 200 104 96 0 10 6 UPT BABEL 10 3 3 0 0 7 7 UPT BATAM 15 14 14 0 0 1 8 UPT PALEMBANG 282 282 220 53 9 0 9 UPT BENGKULU 10 5 5 0 0 5

10 UPT LAMPUNG 1221 1148 1108 40 0 73 11 UPT DKI JAKARTA 126 126 70 51 5 0 12 UPT BANTEN 33 33 33 0 0 0 13 UPT BANDUNG 48 48 18 27 3 0 14 UPT YOGYAKARTA 1100 1005 985 5 15 95 15 UPT SEMARANG 11 10 10 0 0 1 16 UPT SURABAYA 38 38 0 38 0 0 17 UPT DENPASAR 33 33 0 33 0 0 18 UPT MATARAM 1501 1501 1336 163 2 0 19 UPT KUPANG 14 14 0 14 0 0 20 UPT SAMARINDA 19 19 7 12 0 0 21 UPT BALIKPAPAN 47 13 3 10 0 34 22 UPT PONTIANAK 36 34 30 0 4 2 23 UPT PALANGKARAYA 18 18 0 18 0 0 24 UPT BANJARMASIN 22 22 0 22 0 0 25 UPT MANADO 19 19 0 19 0 0 26 UPT PALU 35 35 20 14 1 0 27 UPT MAKASAR 1330 1228 671 547 10 102 28 UPT AMBON 5 5 5 0 0 0 29 UPT GORONTALO 8 8 8 0 0 0 30 UPT TERNATE 215 209 100 105 4 6 31 UPT KENDARI 16 16 0 16 0 0 32 UPT JAYAPURA 11 9 6 3 0 2 33 UPT MERAUKE 5 5 5 0 0 0 34 UPT TAHUNA 695 695 695 0 0 0

35 UPT SORONG 26 26 0 26 0 0

TOTAL 8524 8144 6667 1403 74 380

Table 7.1. Recapitulation of Monitoring Result at each UPT in 2012

151


and UPT Makassar. But, especially for UPT Balikpapan, although the frequency usage identifi ed was not many, a lot of advance monitoring would still be conducted.

If viewed from the type of services monitored, the types of fi xed and broadcast services became the most identifi ed services from the result of monitoring done. As many as 3398 fi xed service type of frequency and 2210 broadcast service type were identifi ed in the conducted monitoring. Even though for both types of these services the discipline/legality level of monitored frequency was quite high, i.e. 79.8% for fi xed service and 71% for broadcast service, this discipline level was still relatively lower than other types of services identifi ed.

The lowest level of discipline of frequency usage is found in amateur radio. From 92 frequencies identifi ed from monitoring result, only 18.5% which were legal and the remaining was illegal frequency usage. Meanwhile, the highest level of discipline is found in service types of disaster and navigation radio where from the total of identifi ed usage, all had legal status. In this year of 2012, the usage of astronomy service type was not identifi ed.

Monitoring result of frequency usage according to frequency band showed that the most monitored and identifi ed frequency band was SHF band which is located at frequency spectrum 3 to 30 GHz, the amount of which was far more than other types of bands. The next most monitored bands were UHF band and VHF band. From these monitored frequency bands, the majority (95.1%) identifi ed the presence of frequency usage. But, if viewed from the side of discipline to legality of frequency usage, the highest level of discipline

NO SERVICEMONITORING RESULT IN 2012

NO.

Identified Legal Illegal Not in line with ISR

1 DISASTER 36 36 0 0

2 NAVIGATION RADIO 740 740 0 0

3 ASTRONOMY 0 0 0 0

4 AVIATION 748 735 13 0

5 MARITIME 198 173 0 25

6 BROADCAST 2121 1548 573 0

7 FIXED 3394 2713 681 0

8 MOBILE 815 705 61 49

9 AMATEUR RADIO 92 17 75 0 8144 6667 1403 74

Table 7.2. Frequency Monitoring Result based on services

152


found on the use of LM and MF frequency bands which achieved 97.6%. In the meantime, the most monitored frequency band usage was SHF frequency, which had quite high level of discipline where 80.8% of the identifi ed bands were legal and only 19.6% illegal. But, those three most identifi ed types of spectrum bands, i.e. VHF, UHF and SHF, also became the bands that most widely experienced further monitoring following the result of monitoring conducted.

7.3.1. Monitoring and Law Enforcement of FrequencyThe monitoring result of frequency usage conducted by UPT Monfrek shows varied number of frequency violations found in each UPT. The variation of the number of frequency disturbances found in fact did not show the correlation with the status/size of UPT and the high intensity of frequency usage where such UPT Monfrek located. The highest fi ndings of frequency usage violations in 2012 was found in UPT Monfrek Bandung which has the status of Monitoring Offi ce Class 2, followed by UPT Yogyakarta and UPT Surabaya with fi ndings of violations achieving more than 100. Even in UPT Bandung the fi ndings of violations achieved 200. Those three UPT were considered as big UPT and the intensity of frequency usage in their work area was considered high. But, the next biggest fi ndings of violations which also considered quite high were found in UPT Monfrek Bangka Belitung with 65 fi ndings, UPT Monfrek Jayapura with 70 fi ndings and UPT Monfrek Samarinda with 86 fi ndings of violations during 2012. For area outside Java and Sumatra, the highest fi ndings of violations were found in UPT Monfrek Samarinda and Jayapura.

In the meantime, some UPT Monfrek which are considered big and where the intensity of frequency usage in those cities is also high, precisely showed fi ndings of frequency usage violations which were not too big. Some big UPT Monfrek in Java such as UPT Monfrek Jakarta and UPT Monfrek Semarang only found 48 and 43 frequency usage violations respectively although the intensity of their frequency usage was considered high. Meanwhile, work area with low fi ndings of frequency usage violations were found in UPT Bengkulu,

NO FREQUENCY BAND

MONITORING RESULT

Monitored Identified Legal Illegal Not in line

Advance Monitoring

1 LF-MF (30-3000 KHz) 776 761 743 15 3 15

2 HF (3-30 MHz) 465 415 315 87 13 50

3 VHF (30-300 MHz) 2152 2056 1661 368 27 96

4 UHF (300-3000 MHz) 1508 1408 1047 330 31 100

5 SHF (3 – 30 GHz) 3623 3504 2901 603 0 119

6 EHF (30-300 GHz) 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 8524 8144 6667 1403 74 380

Table 7.3. Frequency

Monitoring Result based on Band

153


UPT Lampung, UPT Ambon, UPT Gorontalo and UPT Ternate. Even in work area of UPT Ambon and Ternate there was no violation of frequency usage found. Meanwhile, in UPT Bengkulu and UPT Lampung, there were only 1 and 4 violations of frequency usage found respectively. However, compared to that in 2011, the fi ndings of frequency usage violations in 2012 were relatively higher and almost evenly distributed in all regions.

A few of or no fi ndings of frequency usage violations in the area with high intensity of frequency means the frequency users are already in order and observant to the regulations so that there is no violation. Orderly and good frequency users will not commit violation such as illegal frequency usage, not extend frequency usage license or using frequency which is not in line with the purpose of its allocation.

No

AREA OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

VIOLATION ACTION

Illegal

Expired License

Not in line with

purpose ofallocation

Total Confiscated Seal Warned Total

1 UPT NAD 22 1 0 23 0 0 23 23 2 UPT MEDAN 20 35 9 64 9 12 43 64 3 UPT PADANG 36 4 14 54 0 3 51 54 4 UPT PEKANBARU 41 0 0 41 1 17 23 41 5 UPT JAMBI 13 3 0 16 0 10 6 16 6 UPT BABEL 54 6 5 65 0 37 28 65 7 UPT BATAM 39 0 1 40 25 0 15 40 8 UPT PALEMBANG 47 5 6 58 0 4 54 58 9 UPT BENGKULU 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1

10 UPT LAMPUNG 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 4 11 UPT DKI JAKARTA 42 0 6 48 0 0 48 48 12 UPT BANTEN 33 0 0 33 0 33 0 33 13 UPT BANDUNG 134 51 15 200 6 21 173 200 14 UPT YOGYAKARTA 162 12 2 176 2 6 168 176 15 UPT SEMARANG 42 0 1 43 10 0 33 43 16 UPT SURABAYA 105 0 9 114 19 41 54 114 17 UPT DENPASAR 83 2 1 86 20 0 66 86 18 UPT MATARAM 19 0 0 19 0 2 17 19 19 UPT KUPANG 46 18 9 73 0 0 73 73 20 UPT SAMARINDA 85 0 1 86 4 0 82 86 21 UPT BALIKPAPAN 24 2 8 34 0 0 34 34 22 UPT PONTIANAK 39 3 1 43 9 2 32 43 23 UPT PALANGKARAYA 32 2 2 36 0 2 34 36 24 UPT BANJARMASIN 34 6 24 64 0 0 64 64 25 UPT MANADO 45 0 0 45 5 0 40 45 26 UPT PALU 11 0 0 11 3 0 8 11 27 UPT MAKASAR 34 0 0 34 4 2 28 34 28 UPT AMBON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 UPT GORONTALO 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 8 30 UPT TERNATE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 UPT KENDARI 28 0 0 28 0 0 28 28 32 UPT JAYAPURA 50 0 20 70 0 0 70 70 33 UPT MERAUKE 12 0 0 12 0 0 12 12 34 UPT TAHUNA 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 10 35 UPT SORONG 25 0 1 26 4 0 22 26

Table 7.4. Recapitulation of Law Enforcement by each UPT in 2012

154


The composition of the type of violations of frequency usage in 2012, just as in the previous years, was still highly dominated by violations in the form of illegal frequency usage (does not own license of frequency usage). Around 82.9% of violations found were in the form of illegal frequency usage. This proportion was slightly lower than that in 2011 where the violations in the form of illegal frequency usage achieved 84.1%. In the meantime, the proportion of frequency usage violations in the forms of expired licenses and frequency usage which is not in line with the purpose of its allocation were only 9% and 8.17% respectively.

In line with the type of violations much committed, namely violations of illegal frequency usage, actions taken by UPT Monfrek on such violations are mostly in the form of warnings to frequency users. Around 81.1% of the actions taken on the violations of frequency usage are in the form of warnings. This proportion is slightly lower than that in 2011 which achieved 84.3%. In the meantime, the proportion of actions in the form sealing is only 11.5% and in the form of confi scation is only 7.3%.

From the above composition it can be seen that the violations of frequency usage in the form of expired licenses and violations of frequency usage which is not in line with the purpose of its allocation vis-à-vis actions taken are still limited to warnings. In some UPT Monfrek, even for all types of violations of frequency usage found, the actions taken are still limited to warnings such as in UPT Monfrek Banda Aceh, UPT Monfrek Jakarta, UPT Monfrek Kupang UPT Monfrek Banjarmasin, and UPT Monfrek Jayapura. The majority of UPT Monfrek still uses persuasive approach in taking action towards frequency usage violation. On the other hand, some UPT Monfrek takes quite fi rm action even though the violation committed is in the form of illegal frequency usage. UPT Monfrek Semarang, UPT Surabaya, UPT Denpasar and UPT Monfrek Medan, for instance, take action in the form of sealing although the violation found is illegal frequency usage.

Kom

ExpirLicen

6.5%

Gam

mposisi Jenis Pe

red se, %

Nolinepur

allo

bar 7.1A

elanggaran Tahu

Illegal, 85.8%

ot in e with rpose of

ocati…

un 2012

Ko

G

omposisi Jenis T

Confiscated7%

Warnin81%

Gambar 7.1B.

Tindakan Penert

Tahun 2012

g

tiban oleh UPT

Sealed12%

155


The comparison of monitoring result of frequency usage between semester 1 and semester 2 of 2012 shows that in total, there are more fi ndings of frequency usage violation by UPT Monfrek found in semester 1 than in semester 2. This condition is the opposite of fi ndings of violation in 2011 which were more occurred in semester 2. In total, the diff erence of fi nding of violation achieved 266 fi ndings. Findings of violation for all types of illegal violation and usage which is not in line with the allocation are found more in semester 1. Meanwhile, violation of expired license is more found in semester 2.

In line with the distribution of the form of violation of its frequency usage between semester, the actions towards violation committed were also more conducted in semester 1 than in semester 2 of 2012. Action towards violation in the forms of confi scation and particularly warning also more done in semester 1 of 2012 compared in semester 2. However, action in the form sealing was more taken in semester 2, in line with the number of violations in the form of expired license. The number of actions in the form of warning in semester 1 which was far more than in semester 2 resulted in a lot more number of total actions done in semester 1 of 2012 than in semester 2.

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

Semeste

Semeste

00000000000

Illegal

r 1 815r 2 540

Expired License

Notw

purpallo

62

88

t in line with pose of

ocation

Total

73 950

56 684

Figure 7.2 Comparison of Types of Frequency Violations in semester 1 and 2 of 2012

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

Semester

Semester

Confiscated

1 822 40

Sealed W

68

124

arned Tota

800 950

520 684

l

Figure 7.3. Comparison of Types of Actions towards Frequency Violation in semester 1 and 2 of 2012

156


Comparison of law enforcement performed by UPT for the past 3 years shows the increasing tendency of the elevated violations. The number of violations which decreased 2.7% in 2011, increased sharply up to 58.7% in 2012. But, if viewed from the types of violations, there is diff erent increase for each type of violation. In 2011, the type of violation in the form of not in line with the allocation in fact decreased by 70.1% compared to that of the previous year, while violation in the form of illegal usage increased by only 9.9% and for expired license increased very sharply, achieving 97.5%. But, entering 2012, those all three types of violations experienced increase with the highest increase was for the violation type of expired license which achieve 84.8%. In the meantime, if measured absolutely, the highest increase was for violation of illegal usage which increased as many as 408 violations.

From the side of action type, a decrease in 2011 occurred for action type of confi scation and sealing, in line with the decrease in the number of violations performed. The number of actions in 2011 decreased by 1.7% whereas the action type of confi scation decreased by 32.5% and action in the form of sealing as much as 29.2%. Only action in the form of warning which had an increase. In 2012, in line with the increased number of violations, the actions taken towards such violations also increased sharply by 60.8% compared to that of the previous year. Even though the actions taken increased, for action type of sealing in 2012 in fact decreased by 28.2% compared to that in the previous year. The high increase occurred for action type of sealing which increased by 215.7% But, in absolute measurement, the highest increase was for action type of warning which increased by 433 warning action compared to that in 2011.

No Year

VIOLATION ACTION

Illegal Expired License

Not in line with

allocation Total Confiscated Sealed Warned Total

1 2010 665 40 184 889 126 72 671 869 2 2011 731 79 55 865 85 51 718 854 3 2012 1139 146 88 1373 61 161 1151 1373

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2010

2011

2012

Table 7.5. Comparison of Law Enforcement by all

UPT in 2010 - 2012

Figure 7.4. Comparison of the type of

violation and action for law enforcement of frequency

in 2010 - 2012

157


7.3.2. Report on Frequency DisturbancesBesides through frequency monitoring activity by UPT Monfrek, the fi ndings of frequency disturbances are also found from reports submitted by the public or stakeholders on frequency disturbances experienced by them. The reports on frequency disturbances are submitted to UPT Monfrek for further remedial actions. Up to semester 2 of 2012, 50 reports on frequency disturbances were received in 12 UPT Monfrek. This amount is increased by 56.3% compared to that in semester 2 of 2011 which were only 32 reports. The number of UPT which submitted disturbances reports also increased compared to that in semester 2 of 2011. But, compared to that in semester 1 of 2012, these disturbances reports was far smaller, only 43.5% of the disturbances reports in semester 1. The most of frequency disturbances reports were received in UPT Monfrek of Java area particularly in Bandung which received 11 reports of frequency disturbances fi ndings, followed by Surabaya as many as 8 disturbances reports. From the distribution of those disturbances reports according to month, it is shown that most of frequency disturbances reports occurred in July. Meanwhile, in December there was only 1 frequency disturbances report received in all available UPT.

Table 7.6. Frequency Disturbances Found by UPT Monfrek in Semester 2 of 2012

No UPT Month

Total July August September October November December

1 Banda Aceh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medan 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Padang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Jambi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Pekanbaru 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Batam 1 0 3 1 0 0 5 7 Palembang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Bengkulu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lampung 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Pangkal Pinang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 DKI Jakarta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Banten 0 1 1 0 2 0 4 13 Bandung 7 2 2 0 0 0 11 14 Semarang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 DI Yogyakarta 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 16 Surabaya 1 2 0 2 2 1 8 17 Pontianak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Banjarmasin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Palangkaraya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Samarinda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Balikpapan 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 22 Denpasar 5 2 0 0 0 0 7 23 Mataram 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 24 Kupang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Gorontalo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Manado 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 27 Palu 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

28 Makassar 1 0 1 2 1 0 5 29 Kendari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Jayapura 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 31 Merauke 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Ambon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Ternate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Sorong 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Tahuna 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 16 7 11 8 7 1 50

158


The interesting data from this frequency disturbances report is that there is a relatively high number of frequency disturbances reports in UPT Monfrek Bandung than in other UPT Monfrek. This relatively high number of frequency disturbances reports is in line with the fi ndings of frequency usage violations which was also the highest in UPT Monfrek Bandung as shown in the previous table. In the report of frequency monitoring result, 200 frequency usage violations were found in UPT Monfrek Bandung. The same goes for UPT Denpasar and UPT Surabaya where the high number of frequency usage violations was in line with the frequency disturbances reports submitted.

Figure 7.5 also shows the frequency disturbances reports submitted by UPT Monfrek in this semester 2 was lower than in semester 1. This pattern is the same as occurred in 2011 where frequency disturbances reports in semester 2 tend to decrease. Even in some UPT monfrek with working area which has high frequency usage intensity, frequency disturbances reports in semester 1 was also much higher than in semester 2, such as in Bandung and Makassar. In the meantime, in UPT Monfrek Yogyakarta, UPT Monfrek Manado, UPT Monfrek Palu, and UPT Monfrek Jayapura, reports on the occurrence of frequency disturbances were only found in semester 2 after there was no frequency disturbances report submitted in semester 1.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Band

a Ac

ehM

edan

Pada

ngJa

mbi

Peka

nbar

uBa

tam

Pale

mba

ngBe

ngku

luLa

mpu

ngPa

ngka

l Pin

ang

DKI J

akar

taBa

nten

Band

ung

Sem

aran

gDI

Yog

yaka

rta

Sura

baya

Pont

iana

kBa

njar

mas

inPa

lang

kara

yaSa

mar

inda

Balik

papa

nDe

npas

arM

atar

amKu

pang

Goro

ntal

oM

anad

oPa

luM

akas

sar

Kend

ari

Jaya

pura

Mer

auke

Ambo

nTe

rnat

eSo

rong

Tahu

na

Semester 2 Semester 1

Figure 7.5. Comparison of frequency

Disturbances Findings according to Provinces in

Semester 1 and 2 of 2012

No UPT Month





Total 16 7 11 8 7 1 50

No UPT Month





Total 16 7 11 8 7 1 50

159


Comparison of frequency disturbances reports between semester 1 and semester 2 of 2012 according to big island shows that in island with high intensity of frequency usage, frequency disturbances reports were found more in semester 1 than in semester 2. But, in Sumatra Island, frequency disturbances reports in semester 1 were only slightly more than in semester 2. A lot more frequency disturbance reports found in semester 2 only occurred in Maluku-Papua regions. In these regions which consist of 5 UPT Monfrek, during semester 1 of 2012 there was no frequency disturbances report received and in semester 2 only 2 frequency disturbance reports found. This is allegedly due to the intensity of frequency usage in such regions is still relatively low.

Distribution of frequency disturbances reports according to big islands as shown in Figure 7.7. indicates that the biggest proportion of frequency disturbances reports still found in Java Island. Around 57.4% of frequency disturbances reports during 2012 found in Java Island with the proportion which was slightly diff erent between semester 1 and semester 2. This proportion decreased compared to that in 2011 which achieved 66%. Meanwhile, the second biggest proportion precisely found in Sulawesi and Bali-Nusa Tenggara regions with the same proportion, i.e. 13%. This is diff erent with the previous year where the second biggest proportion was found in Sumatera which also had high intensity of frequency usage. Figure 7.7 also shows that for regions with wide area and low intensity of frequency usage, the frequency disturbances reports are also lower. Frequency disturbances reports for combination of Kalimantan-Maluku islands and Papua in total were only 8.6%. This composition shows that there is correlation between the high number of frequency disturbances reports and the density of frequency usage in a region, even though in Sumatera for the year of 2012 this becomes an exception.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Semester

Semester

Sumatera 1 7

2 6

a Jawa68

25

Bali-Nus13

8

sra Kalimant10

2

tan Sulawe14

7

esi Maluku-P0

2

Papua

Figure 7.6. Comparison of frequency disturbances reports according to big islands in semester 1 and 2 of 2012

160


From the side of frequency type which is the most frequently disturbed, frequency usage for FM radio and frequency for Fixed Service still become the frequencies which have the most disturbances. During 2012 there were 13 disturbances reports for FM radio frequency and 11 disturbances for Fixed Service. In the meantime, aviation frequency experienced a decrease of frequency disturbances from 11 in 2011 to only 5 in 2012. Frequency disturbances reports for these two frequencies were much more than the disturbances for other types of frequency as seen in fi gure 7.8. Findings of frequency disturbances reports for the frequency type of satellite, concession, Defense and Security, and frequency type of BWA only 1 report for each frequency.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Maluku-Pa

Sulawesi

Kalimantan

Bali-Nusra

Jawa

Sumatera

%

%

%

%

%

%

Sempua 0

12

n 8

11

60

6

mester 10.0%

2.5%

8.9%

1.6%

0.7%

6.3%

Semester4.0%

14.0%

4.0%

16.0%

50.0%

12.0%

r 2 Total1.2%

13.0%

7.4%

13.0%

57.4%

8.0%

2012 is marked by higher fi ndings of frequency disturbances reports in Sulawesi and Bali-Nusa Tenggara which was higher than in Sumatera. In fact the intensity of frequency usage in Sumatera was bigger than in Sulawesi.

D

Fixed S

Other M

Defense and Se

Conc

Service (Conce

Cellula

S

Means of Radio

BWA (2.3 G

AM Ra

ecurity (400 M

ession (350 M

ession) (150 M

Aviat

FM Ra

r Microwave L

Satellite (2.5 G

GSM 2G and

o Communicat

0 2

Hz)

dio

Hz)

Hz)

Hz)

ion

dio

Link

Hz)

3G

ion

1

1

1

1

4

2

5

4

4

6 8

5

6

10 12

11

14

13

Figure 7.8 The amount of frequency

disturbances according to the type of frequency

services in 2012

Figure 7.8 The amount of frequency

disturbances according to the type of frequency

services in 2012

161


7.4. Monitoring and Law Enforcement of EquipmentBesides conducting monitoring on frequency disturbances, monitoring is also done on the conformity of the equipment used with the standard or prevailing regulation for three aspects, i.e. label of tool/equipment, the existence of the holder of certifi cate of tool/equipment, and verifi cation of after sales service (service center) of holder of certifi cate of tool/equipment. Monitoring is also conducted on the level of discipline in tool/equipment usage, especially the equipment for broadcast radio and broadcast television. The discipline is seen from the side of equipment certifi cate ownership by providers of broadcast radio and broadcast television.

In this year of 2012, monitoring and law enforcement on label conformity of the tool/equipment of post and information technology and monitoring on the existence of holder of tool/equipment certifi cate is not conducted. Monitoring activity of equipment conducted were verifi cation of certifi cate and label of equipment of post and information technology towards businesspersons and verifi cation of certifi cate and label of equipment of post and information technology towards providers of broadcast radio and television done in semester 1. Meanwhile, in semester 2 verifi cation/checking was done on standardization of equipment of post and information technology from equipment vendors or users and law enforcement of terminal tool and equipment of post and information technology integrally.

7.4.1. Monitoring of Telecommunication Tool/Equipment Certifi cateVerifi cation/checking activity on the standardization of equipment is conducted in 20 cities to 460 vendors and 141 users. Verifi cation activity in the regions of Java, Bali and big cities in Sumatera mostly done to the vendors. Meanwhile, verifi cation in the regions of Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Maluku is conducted towards the usage of equipment of post and information technology by the users. The number of providers which conducted the most verifi cation on the standardization of equipment was found in Jakarta which conducted verifi cation on 228 vendors, followed by Bali which conducted verifi cation on 55 vendors and 7 users. In the meantime, in Kalimantan region such as in Palangkaraya and Banjarmasin, only verifi cation on 6 users performed in Palangkaraya and 7 users in Banjarmasin.

Based on the result of verifi cation checking done towards the equipment used by vendors and users, the level of discipline to the certifi cation and labeling of the equipment used is quite high. In total, from 601 providers (vendors and users) verifi ed, the level of discipline achieved 74.7%. That means 74.7%

162


of providers used certifi ed or labeled tool/equipment. Meanwhile, the use of certifi ed but not labeled tools/equipment achieved 12.3% and only 13% of the providers used the tools/equipment which do not have certifi cate. The high level of discipline of certifi cation and labeling of tool/equipment by the providers was found in Yogyakarta, Bandung, Batam and Kupang. In these regions, all or almost 100% of tools/equipment used were certifi ed and labeled. Some other regions which also had high level of discipline were Banten, Medan and Jakarta.

Table 7.7. Verifi cation/checking on standardization of the equipment of post and information technology

However, the provision of postal and information technology activity in some regions also shows low level of discipline in using certifi ed and labeled tool/equipment. The low level of discipline for certifi ed and labeled tool/equipment was found in Padang, Samarinda, Palangkaraya, Banjarmasin, Mataram, Manado and Makassar. In those regions, none of the tool/equipment used certifi ed and labeled. The highest level of discipline was only found on the usage of certifi ed but not labeled too/equipment. For vendors/users in Palangkaraya, Banjarmasin, Mataram and Manado, more than 50% of tool/equipment used by them were not certifi ed. The low level of discipline also seen in Pontianak where 92.9% of vendors/users used uncertifi ed tool/equipment. Meanwhile, in Mataram, vendors/users which used uncertifi ed tool/equipment achieved

NO CITY

NUMBER OF PROVIDERS

NUMBER OF TELECOMMUNICATION TOOL/EQUIPMENT

TOTAL Vendor User

Certified and labeled

Certified and not labeled Not certified

1 Yogyakarta 35 - 35 - - 35 2 Lampung 25 2 25 1 1 27 3 Bandung 20 - 20 - - 20 4 Banten 21 3 21 - 3 24 5 Batam 41 - 40 - 1 41 6 Medan 24 - 20 - 4 24 7 Bali 55 7 55 3 4 62 8 Gorontalo 11 10 11 - 10 21 9 Kupang - 11 11 - - 11

10 Pontianak - 14 1 - 13 14 11 Ambon - 12 8 - 4 12 12 Padang - 9 - 6 3 9 13 Samarinda - 10 - 7 3 10 14 Palangkaraya - 6 - 3 3 6 15 Banjarmasin - 7 - 3 4 7 16 Mataram - 12 - 3 9 12 17 Manado - 14 - 5 9 14 18 Makassar - 13 - 8 5 13 19 Palembang - 11 9 9 2 11 20 Jakarta 228 - 202 26 - 228

JUMLAH 460 141 449 74 78 601

163


75%. From such distribution, it is seen that vendors/users outside Java and Sumatera (except Padang) tend to have low level of discipline in using telecommunication tool/equipment.

7.4.2. Integrated Law Enforcement of Terminal Tool/Equipment of Post and Information Technology

Monitoring and law enforcement activities on terminal tool and equipment are conducted to the usage of broadcast radio and broadcast TV providers. Monitoring and law enforcement activities in 2012 were conducted in 9 capitals of provinces/big cities, preceded by coordination meeting with local UPT, TV association (local and private), and PRSSNI. In the implementation, law enforcement is conducted in the form of development towards broadcast radio and television providers which already have ISR, by checking the equipment and certifi cate owned, and if there is any user who does not have the equipment certifi cate, warning will be given and it is suggested to perform certifi cation on their equipment.

The result of law enforcement done towards 268 broadcast radio providers and 106 broadcast TV providers shows diff erent condition. In broadcast radio providers, the use of terminal equipment which have not met the requirement is far more than those which already met the requirement. On the other hand, for broadcast TV providers, the condition is quite good where the use of equipment which is in line with requirement is more than those which do not meet the requirement. Discipline level of the owner of certifi cate for broadcast radio providers shows low level of discipline. From the result of monitoring and law enforcement conducted in nine cities, the level of discipline was only 23.1%. Very low level of discipline on the use of terminal equipment of broadcast radio occurred on the provisions of

100.0%92.6%

100

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Yogy

akar

ta

Lam

pung

Bd

0.0%87.5%

97.6%83.3%88.7%

5

Band

ung

Bant

en

Bata

m

Med

an Bali

%

2.4%

100.0%

7.1%

66.7%

0.0

Goro

ntal

o

Kupa

ng

Pont

iana

k

Ambo

n

Pada

ng

0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.

Pada

ng

Sam

arin

da

Pala

ngka

raya

Banj

arm

asin

Mat

aram

.0%0.0%

88.6%74.7%

82%

Man

ado

Mak

assa

r

Pale

mba

ng

Jaka

rta

Tota

l

%

Not certified

Certified and not labeled

Figure 7.9. Level of Discipline of certifi cate and label of tool/equipment by vendors/users

164


radio in Bandung which was only 4.2%, in Makassar 7.0% and in Yogyakarta which was only 11.1%. Suffi ciently high level of discipline occurred on the provisions of broadcast radio in Batam which achieved 7.1%, Banten 57.1%, and Banjarmasin which achieved 52.2%.

In the meantime, level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership of broadcast television shows higher fi gures. From the total of 106 broadcast television providers in eight cities monitored, level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership achieved 73.6% or only slightly lower than 81%. From eight cities where the monitoring was conducted, the high level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate of broadcast television providers was found in broadcast TV providers in Makassar and Banten which achieved 100%, Banjarmasin which achieved 86.7% and Yogyakarta which achieved 84.6%. But, for broadcast TV providers in Batam and Surabaya, their level of discipline of broadcast TV equipment usage only achieved 50% and 53.3% respectively. The number of broadcast TV providers which are not many and quite strict licensing and supervision resulted in relatively higher level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership of broadcast television providers.

Figure 7.10 shows the comparison of level of discipline of tool/certifi cate ownership between broadcast radio providers and broadcast television providers. From that diagram, sharp diff erences are seen where level of discipline of certifi cate ownership of broadcast television providers which is far higher than broadcast radio providers. But, from that diagram it is also seen a contradictive thing between Batam and Makassar. In Batam, where the level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership of broadcast radio providers was quite high, its level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership of television providers turned out to be lower than in other regions. On the contrary, in Makassar, even though it has low level of discipline of tool/

No Region Broadcast Radio Provider Broadcast TV Provider

Meet Requirement

Not meet requirement

Level of Discipline

Meet Requirement

Not meet requirement

Level of Discipline

1 Banten 12 9 57.1% 4 - 100.0% 2 Semarang 9 34 20.9% 19 5 79.2% 3 Medan 4 18 18.2% - - 0.0% 4 Batam 10 4 71.4% 7 7 50.0% 5 Bandung 1 23 4.2% 11 5 68.8% 6 Surabaya 9 37 19.6% 8 7 53.3% 7 Makassar 3 40 7.0% 5 - 100.0% 8 Banjarmasin 10 9 52.6% 13 2 86.7% 9 Yogyakarta 4 32 11.1% 11 2 84.6%

TOTAL 62 206 23.1% 78 28 73.6%

Table 7.8. Level of Discipline of

terminal equipment usage in Broadcast

Radio/TV

165


equipment certifi cate ownership for broadcast radio providers, its level of discipline of tool/equipment certifi cate ownership for broadcast television providers precisely was very high.

7.5. Performance of UPT Frequency Monitoring

The performance and capacity of UPT Radio Frequency Spectrum Monitoring are also measured from the resources owned and work load of supervision that must be done. Evaluation on performance capacity of this UPT also becomes the confi rmation on performance in conducting monitoring and law enforcement carried out by UPT Monfrek. Resources owned by UPT Monfrek can be seen from the number of the existing staff at said UPT Monfrek and monitoring equipment owned and the types of services of monitor station provided. Meanwhile, the work load can be illustrated from the vastness of the region and geographical condition of monitoring area and the number of objects that must be monitored, namely in the form of the number of stations, the number of BTS, the number of broadcast radios and the number of broadcast TV. Discussion on the performance of this UPT begins with the condition of supporting equipment of Spectrum Management Information System (SIMS) at the offi ce of UPT. Condition of SIMS equipment in UPT as illustrated in table 7.9 shows that they are in quite good condition and in suffi cient amount. Most of supporting

Br

Br

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

roadcast Radio

roadcast TV

Banten Sem57.1% 20

100.0% 79

arang Medan.9% 18.2%

.2% 0.0%

n Batam% 71.4%

50.0%

Bandung4.2%

68.8%

Surabaya Ma19.6% 7

53.3% 10

akassar Banjarm7.0% 52.6

00.0% 86.7

masin Yogyakarta% 11.1%

% 84.6%

a

Figure 7.10. Level of Discipline of Tool/Equipment Usage of Broadcast Radio and TV Providers

There is contradictive condition in the discipline of using broadcast radio and broadcast TV equipment between Batam and Makassar. In Batam, the level of discipline which was high for equipment usage of broadcast radio, turned out to be low for equipment usage of broadcast TV. On the contrary, in Makassar, the level of discipline which was very low for equipment usage of broadcast radio, for equipment usage of broadcast TV its level of discipline precisely was very high.

166


equipment for SIMS in this UPT are Desktop PC and monitor equipment which become main equipment in monitoring SIMS. If viewed from the condition of the equipment, overall most of the conditions of facilities and infrastructure of SIMS equipment which spread over more than 20 UPT were in a supporting condition where 94.6% were in good condition. Even for several types of equipment such as webcam, UPS, barcode, keyboard, and mouse and stabilizer were all in good condition. Only printer type of equipment which was 17.2% in damage condition.

If viewed from the condition of SIMS equipment according to UPT, it also shows that in almost all UPT where monitoring of the equipment condition is conducted the equipment were in good condition. Some equipment which were in quite damaged condition were found in some UPT, namely UPT Palembang, UPT Bangka Belitung and UPT Gorontalo, where there were three damaged equipment out of the supporting equipment owned by SIMS.

No. Equipment Condition of Equipment

Total Good Damage 1 Laptop 30 26 4

2 Monitor 55 53 2

3 PC Desktop 67 64 3

4 LAN Network 26 25 1

5 Webcam 27 27 0

6 Speaker 27 25 2

7 UPS 9 9 0

8 Printer 29 24 5

9 Barcode 29 29 0

10 Microphone 25 24 1

11 Keyboard & Mouse 6 6 0

12 Stabilizer 4 4 0

Total 334 316 18

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

86.7%

Good

Damage

%96.4% 95.5% 96.2

2%100.0%92.6%1000.0%82.8%

100.0%%96.0%100.0%100.0

%94.6%


condition of facility and infrastructure of SIMS

equipment at UPT

Table 7.9. Facility and Infrastructure

of SIMS equipment at UPT according to type of

equipment

167


Meanwhile, in the majority of other UPT all their SIMS supporting equipment were in good condition, such as in UPT Padang, UPT Pekanbaru, UPT Medan, all UPT in Java Island and some other UPT.

Comparison of the condition of UPT Monfrek by looking at the equipment owned, number of supporting human resources and work load of supervision will provide the illustration on proportionality of resources supporting the work of UPT Monfrek with work load that must be done by UPT Monfrek. UPT Monfrek in Java Island has greater supporting power and capacity in the form of the number of staff and monitoring equipment owned compared to UPT Monfrek in other regions although its geographical area is smaller. This is because the monitoring load performed is also greater as shown by number of stations, number of BTS, and the number of frequency usage of broadcast radio which is greater compared to other regions. Hence, the performance load of UPT Monfrek is not only measured from the vastness of working area and from the number of population as proxy of services provided by said UPT Monfrek, but also from the size of the objects that must be monitored by UPT Monfrek. Nevertheless, some UPT Monfrek due to the geographical condition of their working areas are also in need of more monitoring equipment compared to other UPT Monfrek. UPT Monfrek Kupang and UPT Monfrek Samarinda, for example, show more monitoring equipment and more types of services of monitoring stations compared to other UPT Monfrek due to geographical condition of their working areas. So is UPT Monfrek Merauke besides also its vast working area.

No UPT Condition of Equipment No UPT

Condition of Equipment

Good Damage Good Damage 1 UPT NAD 11 1 19 UPT KUPANG 11 0 2 UPT MEDAN 11 0 20 UPT SAMARINDA 11 0 3 UPT PADANG 10 0 21 UPT BALIKPAPAN 13 0 4 UPT PEKANBARU 10 0 22 UPT PONTIANAK 12 0 5 UPT JAMBI 10 1 23 UPT PALANGKARAYA 12 1 6 UPT BABEL 11 3 24 UPT BANJARMASIN 13 0 7 UPT BATAM 12 1 25 UPT MANADO 11 0 8 UPT PALEMBANG 8 3 26 UPT PALU 11 0 9 UPT BENGKULU 8 1 27 UPT MAKASAR 8 0

10 UPT LAMPUNG 11 0 28 UPT AMBON 10 1 11 UPT DKI JAKARTA 12 0 29 UPT GORONTALO 8 3 12 UPT BANTEN 10 0 30 UPT TERNATE 7 2 13 UPT BANDUNG 10 0 31 UPT KENDARI 12 1 14 UPT YOGYAKARTA 11 0 32 UPT JAYAPURA 0 0 15 UPT SEMARANG 10 0 33 UPT MERAUKE 0 0 16 UPT SURABAYA 0 0 34 UPT TAHUNA 0 0 17 UPT DENPASAR 11 0 35 UPT SORONG 0 0 18 UPT MATARAM 11 0 Total

Table 7.10. Facility and Infrastructure of SIMS Equipment in UPT according to UPT

168


Table 7.11. Condition of

Resources and Work Load of

the Respective UPT Frequency

Monitoring in Indonesia in

2012

No

UPT

N

umbe

r of

Sta

ff

Vas

tnes

s of

R

egio

n (k

m2)

Num

ber

of

Popu

lati

on

Geo

grap

hica

l C

ondi

tion

Mon

itor

ing

Equi

pmen

t O

wne

d

Type

s of

Ser

vice

s of

mon

itor

ing

Stat

ion

Num

ber

of

Stat

ion

Num

ber

of B

TS

Num

ber

of

Broa

dcas

t ra

dio

Num

ber

of

Broa

dcas

t Te

levi

sion

To

tal

PPN

S

1 U

PT N

AD

22

4

5795

6 4,

626,

605

Land

M

OB:

2

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

7.19

3,00

21

42

61

9

2 U

PT M

EDA

N

37

10

7298

1,23

13

,327

,196

La

nd

FIX

: 5

FIX

: L/

H/V

/UH

F 21

.124

,00

5650

13

3 15

M

OB:

5

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

3 U

PT P

AD

AN

G

26

4 42

012,

89

4,90

8,17

2 La

nd

MO

B: 3

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 6.

952,

00

2094

56

20

4 U

PT P

EKA

NBA

RU

20

4

8702

3,66

6,

030,

685

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

15.0

30,0

0 39

42

44

21

5 U

PT J

AM

BI

24

4 50

058,

16

3,20

7,10

7 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

4.38

1,00

11

24

30

19

6 U

PT B

ABE

L 17

4

1642

4,06

1,

247,

143

Land

PO

RT :

1 M

OB

: V/U

HF

2.29

2,00

64

6 22

9

7 U

PT B

ATA

M

24

9 82

01,7

2 1,

828,

428

Isla

nds

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

5.38

4,00

13

47

19

13

8 U

PT P

ALE

MBA

NG

26

9

9149

2,43

7,

810,

779

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

9.13

2,00

22

63

60

30

9 U

PT B

ENG

KU

LU

17

4 19

919,

33

1,81

8,93

3 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

1.95

1,00

55

4 21

8

10

UPT

LA

MPU

NG

21

9

3462

3,8

7,78

7,48

3 La

nd

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 8.

278,

00

2602

59

15

11

UPT

DK

I JA

KA

RTA

41

12

66

4,01

9,

640,

481

Land

FI

X :

4 FI

X :

V/U

HF

33.4

84,0

0 72

15

50

20

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F

12

UPT

BA

NTE

N

27

7 96

62,9

2 11

,325

,707

La

nd

FIX

: 2

FIX

: L/

HF;

SHF

14.3

06,0

0 35

75

38

11

MO

B: 1

M

OB

: V/U

HF

13

UPT

BA

ND

UN

G

40

10

3537

7,76

44

,819

,456

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 47

.927

,00

1227

2 22

1 44

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

14

UPT

YO

GY

AK

AR

TA

39

11

3133

,15

3,50

7,45

8 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

6.27

5,00

17

72

41

14

15

UPT

SEM

AR

AN

G

46

16

3280

0,69

32

,994

,312

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 28

.587

,00

8611

23

7 33

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

16

UPT

SU

RA

BAY

A

42

12

4779

9,75

38

,003

,268

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 38

.922

,00

1060

3 16

6 47

M

OB:

4

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

17

UPT

DEN

PASA

R

29

9 57

80,0

6 3,

993,

363

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

8.96

5,00

24

61

47

15

18

UPT

MA

TAR

AM

28

6

1857

2,32

4,

665,

510

Land

M

OB:

2

MO

B : V

/UH

F 5.

279,

00

1602

27

9

Land

wit

h Is

land

s

169


19

UPT

KU

PAN

G

30

9 48

718,

1 4,

838,

716

Land

FI

X :

1 FI

X :

L/H

F 3.

529,

00

713

46

14

MO

B: 5

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F

20

UPT

SA

MA

RIN

DA

21

9 20

4534

,34

3,75

5,63

5 La

nd

FIX

: 1

FIX

: L/

HF

12.3

57,0

0 21

98

63

32

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

21

UPT

BA

LIK

PAPA

N

21

5 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F

22

UPT

PO

NTI

AN

AK

22

6

1473

07

4,59

9,62

4 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

6.25

4,00

16

17

46

31

23

UPT

PA

LAN

GK

AR

AY

A

18

3 15

3564

,5

2,34

6,35

0 La

nd

MO

B: 1

M

OB

: V/U

HF

4.59

6,00

11

21

35

21

24

UPT

BA

NJA

RM

ASI

N

19

5 38

744,

23

3,73

2,55

0 La

nd

MO

B: 3

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 6.

294,

00

1320

48

27

25

UPT

MA

NA

DO

23

4

1385

1,64

2,

331,

395

Isla

nds

MO

B: 3

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 3.

591,

00

937

37

26

26

UPT

Tah

una

6 3

Land

-

-

27

UPT

PA

LU

19

6 61

841,

29

2,77

2,18

9 La

nd

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 2.

466,

00

633

22

33

28

UPT

MA

KA

SAR

35

11

63

504,

66

8,27

5,99

6

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 9.

132,

00

2304

46

28

29

UPT

AM

BON

15

3

4691

4,03

1,

535,

961

Land

M

OB:

5

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

1.45

9,00

25

0 13

10

30

UPT

GO

RO

NTA

LO

13

2 11

257,

07

1,07

3,50

4 La

nd

PORT

: 1

MO

B : V

/UH

F 68

0,00

14

5 8

3

31

UPT

TER

NA

TE

14

5 31

982,

5 1,

048,

077

Land

PO

RT :

1 M

OB

: V/U

HF

431,

00

82

6 3

32

UPT

KEN

DA

RI

15

4 38

067,

7 2,

375,

454

Land

PO

RT :

1 M

OB

: V/U

HF

1948

,00

560

19

17

33

UPT

JA

YA

PUR

A

18

5

3190

36,1

3,

018,

788

Isla

nds

Land

La

nd

MO

B: 3

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F

2.70

3,00

47

6 30

26

34

U

PT M

ERA

UK

E 13

4

FIX

: 1

FIX

: L/

HF

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: HF

35

UPT

Sor

ong

8 1

9702

4,27

81

0,18

2 La

nd

- -

79,0

0 48

0

0

No

UPT

N

umbe

r of

Sta

ff

Vas

tnes

s of

R

egio

n (k

m2)

Num

ber

of

Popu

lati

on

Geo

grap

hica

l C

ondi

tion

Mon

itor

ing

Equi

pmen

t O

wne

d

Type

s of

Ser

vice

s of

mon

itor

ing

Stat

ion

Num

ber

of

Stat

ion

Num

ber

of B

TS

Num

ber

of

Broa

dcas

t ra

dio

Num

ber

of

Broa

dcas

t Te

levi

sion

To

tal

PPN

S

1 U

PT N

AD

22

4

5795

6 4,

626,

605

Land

M

OB:

2

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

7.19

3,00

21

42

61

9

2 U

PT M

EDA

N

37

10

7298

1,23

13

,327

,196

La

nd

FIX

: 5

FIX

: L/

H/V

/UH

F 21

.124

,00

5650

13

3 15

M

OB:

5

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

3 U

PT P

AD

AN

G

26

4 42

012,

89

4,90

8,17

2 La

nd

MO

B: 3

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 6.

952,

00

2094

56

20

4 U

PT P

EKA

NBA

RU

20

4

8702

3,66

6,

030,

685

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

15.0

30,0

0 39

42

44

21

5 U

PT J

AM

BI

24

4 50

058,

16

3,20

7,10

7 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

4.38

1,00

11

24

30

19

6 U

PT B

ABE

L 17

4

1642

4,06

1,

247,

143

Land

PO

RT :

1 M

OB

: V/U

HF

2.29

2,00

64

6 22

9

7 U

PT B

ATA

M

24

9 82

01,7

2 1,

828,

428

Isla

nds

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

5.38

4,00

13

47

19

13

8 U

PT P

ALE

MBA

NG

26

9

9149

2,43

7,

810,

779

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

9.13

2,00

22

63

60

30

9 U

PT B

ENG

KU

LU

17

4 19

919,

33

1,81

8,93

3 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

1.95

1,00

55

4 21

8

10

UPT

LA

MPU

NG

21

9

3462

3,8

7,78

7,48

3 La

nd

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F 8.

278,

00

2602

59

15

11

UPT

DK

I JA

KA

RTA

41

12

66

4,01

9,

640,

481

Land

FI

X :

4 FI

X :

V/U

HF

33.4

84,0

0 72

15

50

20

MO

B: 4

M

OB

: H/V

/UH

F

12

UPT

BA

NTE

N

27

7 96

62,9

2 11

,325

,707

La

nd

FIX

: 2

FIX

: L/

HF;

SHF

14.3

06,0

0 35

75

38

11

MO

B: 1

M

OB

: V/U

HF

13

UPT

BA

ND

UN

G

40

10

3537

7,76

44

,819

,456

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 47

.927

,00

1227

2 22

1 44

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

14

UPT

YO

GY

AK

AR

TA

39

11

3133

,15

3,50

7,45

8 La

nd

MO

B: 2

M

OB

: V/U

HF

6.27

5,00

17

72

41

14

15

UPT

SEM

AR

AN

G

46

16

3280

0,69

32

,994

,312

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 28

.587

,00

8611

23

7 33

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

16

UPT

SU

RA

BAY

A

42

12

4779

9,75

38

,003

,268

La

nd

FIX

: 4

FIX

: V

/UH

F 38

.922

,00

1060

3 16

6 47

M

OB:

4

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

17

UPT

DEN

PASA

R

29

9 57

80,0

6 3,

993,

363

Land

M

OB:

3

MO

B : H

/V/U

HF

8.96

5,00

24

61

47

15

18

UPT

MA

TAR

AM

28

6

1857

2,32

4,

665,

510

Land

M

OB:

2

MO

B : V

/UH

F 5.

279,

00

1602

27

9

Land

wit

h Is

land

s

170


Some UPT Monfrek in other regions also show monitoring equipment and frequency service with higher capacity due to the number of urban areas in their working areas in addition to the vastness of geographical condition such as North Sumatra, Riau Islands, and East Kalimantan. These three provinces also show monitoring equipment and types of services of monitoring stations which are relatively more compared to other UPT Monfrek. This situation indicates the increase in the capacity of equipment in order to be better and is also done by considering the number of urban areas causing higher social-economic dynamism of the community, coverage and geographical condition of areas of law enforcement. UPT Monfrek Kupang, UPT Monfrek Jayapura, and UPT Monfrek Merauke have more and various monitoring equipment because the working areas of monitoring of said UPT Monfrek have diffi cult geographical condition which need additional equipment for conducting monitoring work. In the meantime, other UPT Monfrek with geographical condition of working areas which is not too vast /heavy and intensity of frequency usage as objects of monitoring which is not too high, have supporting resources, in particular the monitoring equipment which are relatively in average.

171


8CHAPTER

172


173


Statistics in this standardization sector of post and information technology equipment will present information on the activity in the fi eld of tool and equipment standardization which becomes the task area of Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment at Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. The task of this directorate is to conduct policy formulation, technical guidance, and evaluation in the fi eld of technical standard and service standard of post and information technology,and radio communication. Information presented from performance of this standardization sector is data and analysis from the result of certifi cate issuance of telecommunication tool and equipment, while the process of telecommunication tool and equipment testing through measuring test is conducted by Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT). In the meantime, the issuance of certifi cation and document evaluation testing are conducted by Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology.

The issuance of certifi cates by Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment in terms of its types, consisting of four types, namely new certifi cate, extended certifi cate, extended cum revised certifi cate, and revised certifi cate. In terms of the

STANDARDIZATION

CHAPTER 8

174


type of certifi ed equipment from which the data is presented, there are fi ve (5) types of equipment namely cabled customer equipment (CPE), wireless customer equipment (CPE), transmission equipment, broadcasting equipment, and central equipment. From the side of the parties that submit certifi cation, distinction is made as regards to the request for certifi cation submitted by offi cial distributors authorized by manufacturers of equipment and request for certifi cation submitted by general importers. Presentation of certifi cation data will also describe the distribution of the number of tool and equipment certifi ed according to the country of origin of the equipment and monthly fl uctuation of equipment certifi cate issuance for each type of certifi cate.

8.1. Scope

Standardization data presented in this report will be described in detail with period of time of each data as follows: 1. Data of issuance of new certifi cates in 2007 – 2012.2. Data of issuance of extendedcertifi cate in 2007 – 2012.3. Data of issuance of revised certifi cate in 2007 – 2012.4. Data of issuance of extended cum revised certifi cate in 2007 – 2012.5. Certifi cate issuance according to type of certifi cate and type of tool and

equipment in Semester 2 of 2012.6. Monthly certifi cate issuance according to type of certifi cates in 2007 -

2012.7. Certifi cate issuance according to type of certifi cate and country of origin

of tool and equipment in semester 2 of 2012.8. Monthly certifi cate issuance according to country of origin of tool and

equipment in Semester 2 of 2012.

In this statistical data book of semester 1 of 2012 the number of certifi cate issued according to types of applicants (authorized distributor and general importer) is no longer presented. This is because in database system specifi c data input for the types of applicants is no longer performed and regulations on certifi cation of telecommunication tool and equipment in the future would not diff erentiate between authorized distributor and general importer as applicant.

175


8.2 Concept and Defi nition

This Sub chapter contains defi nitions of terminologies used in presentation of standardization data to give the same interpretation on the terminologies used.1) Telecommunication tool is any tool used in telecommunication.2) Telecommunication equipment is a group of telecommunication tool

which enables telecommunication.3) Certifi cation is a process associated with providing a certifi cate.4) Certifi cate is a document that states the conformity of type of

telecommunication tool and equipment with technical requirements and or standard set.

5) Types of telecommunication tool and equipment are brand, model or type of telecommunication tool and equipment that have certain characteristics.

6) Label is the description of telecommunication tool and equipment in the forms of drawings, writings, or a combination thereof, or other forms that identify the information about the tool and equipment that have been certifi ed.

7) Testing of telecommunication tool and equipment is the assessment of conformity between the characteristics of telecommunication tool and equipment andthe prevailing technical requirements.

8) Technical Requirement is electrical/electronic parameter, safety requirement, and or electromagnetic compatibility requirementwhich conform with the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) or as stipulated by Minister.

9) New Certifi cate is certifi cate issued either through document testing process or measurement testing.

10) Revised Certifi cate is certifi cate issued as revision of the initial/new certifi cate if there is a mistake in the issuance (data are not in line with application document) or if there is a change in the ownership of business entity or the address of business entity..

11) ExtendedCertifi cate is certifi cate issued upon extensionof testing of the tool that has been tested previously and the validity period of the certifi cate is over so that it has to be extended.

12) Extended cum revised certifi cate is certifi cate issued if in the process of certifi cate extensionthere is also a change in the ownership of business entity or the address of business entity whose certifi cate is extended so that data revision is required in extending the certifi cate.

176


8.3. Certifi cate Issuance

Certifi cate issuance on telecommunication tool and equipment that has undergone the process of testing becomes one of the performance criteria of working units of Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment in addition to formulating standards and or technical requirements of equipment. Issuance of tool and equipment certifi cate must be linear with the process of tool and equipment testing carried out by Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory. In other word, the process of authentication of tool and equipment in order to make it possible to enter and circulate in Indonesia need to be supported by quick and controllable process of testing and also by the quick process of certifi cation of the testing result. This certifi cation process of tool and equipment also becomes the implementation arena of the standards created by Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment.

8.3.1. Development of Tool and Equipment Certifi cate IssuanceThe number of tool and equipment certifi cates issued in 2012 increased by 5.1% compared to the previous years, i.e. from 5348 in 2011 to 5621 in 2012. But, this increase in 2012 was lower than that in the previous year, which increased by 6.7%. The increase of the number of telecommunication tool and equipment certifi cates which was still high in 2012 mainly originated from the issuance of revised certifi cates and extended certifi cates. The issuance of revised certifi cates in 2012 increased by 154% compared to that in the previous year. In the meantime, the issuance of extended certifi cates increased by 59.3%. On the other hand, issuance of new certifi cates experienced a decline of 0.6% in 2012. The issuance of new certifi cates and revised cum extended certifi cates which experienced suffi ciently high increased in 2011, precisely had a decline in 2012. On the contrary, extended certifi cate and revised certifi cates which had a decline in 2011, experience an increase in 2012.

Type of Certificate 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

New Certificate 1.882 3.551 4.104 4.065 4.696 4.668

Extension 102 55 243 600 442 704

Revision 158 56 299 249 98 249 Extension Cum Revision 52 40 109 97 112 0

Total 2.194 3.702 4.755 5.011 5.348 5.621

Table 8.1. Number of Certifi cate

Issuance for Each Type in 2007 – 2012

177


The trend of certifi cate issuance for telecommunication tool and equipment from year to year shows that 2012 follows the trend of increased total certifi cate issuance, but, a decline occurred again for the issuance of new certifi cates like what happened in 2010. However, the decline of new certifi cate issuance in 2012 was still smaller than in 2010. In the meantime, from the point of the total number of certifi cates issued, although there was an increase compared to that in the previous year, the percentage of increase of certifi cates issuance in 2012 was the lowest compared to that in the previous years, lower than the increase of the total certifi cates issuance in 2010. It was in this year of 2012 for the fi rst time there was no extended cum revised certifi cates issued.

Even though the issuance of new certifi cates in 2012 had a decline and there was no extended cum revised certifi cates issued, the issuance of certifi cates in total still increased. This was because the issuance of the type of extended certifi cates and revised certifi cates experienced a signifi cant increase in 2012. Even the issuance of revised certifi cates had an increase up to 154%.

The proportion of certifi cates issued shows that the issuance tool and equipment certifi cates is still dominated by new certifi cates. The proportion of new certifi cate issuance in 2012 achieved 83%, declining compared with issuance in 2011 where the proportion reached 87.8%. The large proportion of new certifi cates issuance is the main target of Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment. In the meantime, other types of certifi cates are an addition related to the existence of certifi cates whose validity expired or certifi cates that need revision. But, revised certifi cates had a signifi cant increase where in 2012 its proportion achieved 12.5% as seen in fi gure 8.2. The increase also occurred for revised proportion whose proportion achieved 4.4%. This composition of certifi cate

Figure 8.1. Development of the Number of Certifi cate Issuance for Each Type in 2007 – 2012

178


issuance in 2012 closely follows the composition of certifi cate issuance in 2010 where the proportion of certifi cate issuance was quite signifi cant.

8.3.2. Certifi cate Issuance according to Group of Types of Equipment Certifi cate issuance of tool and equipment according to group of the types of equipment In 2012 shows that the majority of tool and equipment certifi cates issued are for group of wireless (CPE) customer. From the total of 5621 tool and equipment certifi cates issued, around 71.5% are tool and equipment certifi cates for group of wireless (CPE) customer. This proportion is almost the same as the certifi cate issuance in 2011 where the proportion of certifi cate issuance for wireless (CPE) customer achieved 71.7%. Other groups of tool and equipment whose certifi cate were largely issued in 2012 was for Transmission type of equipment, the proportion of which achieved 19.1%. Meanwhile, the type of tool and equipment whose certifi cates were the least issued was Broadcast equipment which was only 51 certifi cates in total or only 0.9% of the equipment certifi cates issued.

The dominance of certifi cate issuance for Wireless customer equipment (CPE) was the more seen for type of new certifi cates. From the total of 4,668 new certifi cates issued in 2012, the proportion of new certifi cates for Wireless customer equipment (CPE) achieved 73.8%. This proportion declined compared

Type

Cabled Customer

Equipment (CPE)

Wireless Customer

Equipment (CPE)

Trans Type

Cabled Customer

Equipment (CPE)

Wireless Customer

Equipment (CPE)

New Certificate

308 3446 810 47 57 4668

Extension 48 376 239 4 37 704 Revision 22 197 26 0 4 249 Extension Cum Revision

0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 378 4019 1075 51 98 5621

Table 8.2. Issuance of certifi cates

according to types of equipment in 2012


Certifi cates Issued According to Types of

Certifi cates in 2007 –2012

179


to that in 2011 which achieved 76.1%, in line with the decline in the number of new certifi cates issued. In the meantime, the proportion of certifi cates for transmission equipment which was the second largest only 17.4% and proportion of new certifi cates for Cable customer equipment (CPE) was only 6.6% as shown in fi gure 8.4. The type of extended certifi cates was still dominated by Wireless customer equipment (CPE), but with the proportion of extended certifi cates issuance for transmission equipment which was also pretty big, i.e. 33.9%.

For the type of certifi cates, the largest proportion was also for wireless customer equipment

(CPE) with the proportion of 79.1%. Meanwhile, for transmission and cable CPE equipment certifi cates, their proportion were only 10.4% and 8.8%. The highest proportion of certifi cates issuance for wireless customer equipment (CPE) particularly for the type of new certifi cate was in line with the increasing usage of telecommunication equipment of consumer product type with wireless technology by the public. This resulted in a lot of wireless customer equipment which entered Indonesian market and had to be tested to get the certifi cates.

Figure 8.3. Composition of Certifi cate Issuance of Equipment according to Type of Equipment

Figure 8.4. Composition of Equipment Certifi cate Issuance according to Type of Equipment and Type of Certifi cate

The high proportion of certifi cate issuance for wireless customer equipment (CPE) particularly for the type of new certifi cate was in line the increasing usage of telecommunication tool and equipment of customer equipment type with wireless technology by the public. This resulted in a lot of wireless customer equipment which entered Indonesian market and had to be tested to get the certifi cates.

180


Besides its large proportion, certifi cate issuance for group of Wireless customer equipment (CPE) in 2012 also shows an increase compared to that in the previous year. Equipment certifi cate issuance for the type of Wireless customer equipment (CPE) in 2012 increased by 4.9%, smaller than the increase in 2011 which achieved 22%. However, this increase was better than the certifi cate issuance for transmission and broadcast equipment which precisely had a decline, although certifi cate issuance for cable CPE and central equipment experienced the higher increase. Figure 8.5 shows positive increase trend for certifi cate issuance of cable customer equipment (CPE) and wireless customer equipment (CPE) from 2010 up to 2012. In the meantime, transmission and broadcast equipment precisely declined and central equipment fl uctuated.

Signifi cant increase in certifi cate issuance of this wireless customer equipment (CPE) had an impact to the composition of equipment certifi cate issuance according to group type of equipment. The proportion of certifi cate issuance for Wireless customer equipment (CPE) in 2012 increased to 71.5% or only slightly decline than in 2011 which achieved 71.7%. The decline in proportion which was not too signifi cant also occurred in the type of transmission and broadcast equipment. Meanwhile, for group type of cable customer equipment (CPE) and central equipment, their proportion increased, although not too high. In other words, in 2012 there was not much shifting in the composition of certifi cates issued according to the type of tool and equipment compared to that in the previous year.

Figure 8.5. Comparison of Certifi cate Issuance of Equipment in

2010 – 2012

181


8.3.3. Fluctuation of Monthly Certifi cate IssuanceMonthly issuance of tool and equipment certifi cates in 2012 showed fl uctuation throughout the year despite the trend of new certifi cate issuance which was higher in semester 2 than in semester 1. New certifi cate issuance in semester 2 achieved 54.1% of the total new certifi cates issued, while for all types of certifi cates (total), the proportion of certifi cate issuance in semester 2 achieved 53.4% and in semester 1 achieved 46.6%. The highest certifi cate issuance occurred in May (semester 1) which achieved 572 certifi cates. But, in semester 2 there were three months where the number of certifi cates issued was quite high (more than 500) i.e. July, November, and December.

The trend of increased tool and equipment certifi cate issuance which elevated in the middle and end of this year was allegedly related to the off er from producers of tool and equipment which tended to rise and there were many off ers of new equipment in the middle of the year and reached its peak at the end of the year. Meanwhile, at the beginning of the year, there were not many products off ered so that new products which had to be tested to get the standard certifi cate were not many either. However, if we compare the monthly fl uctuation of certifi cates issued between 2011 and 2012, we could see that in 2012, there were months where the number of certifi cates issued achieved its peak and such pattern did not occur in 2011. Certifi cate issuance in 2012, in the months of May, July, November, and December, achieved more than 500 certifi cates. Meanwhile, in 2011, fl uctuation of the number of certifi cates issued tended to be evenly distributed among the months.

Figure 8.6 Comparison of Certifi cate Issuance Composition according to Type of Equipment in 2010 - 2012

182


from the beginning of the year until the middle of the year especially for new certifi cates. New certifi cate issuance of tool and equipment which in January was only 316 and in February only 256, achieved more than 350 certifi cates per month in the following months. Even in May it achieved more than 500 certifi cates. The lowest issuance of new certifi cates only occurred in February.

Comparison of monthly certifi cate issuance between semester 2 of 2011 and semester 2 of 2012 shows that for the issuance of new certifi cates, the number of certifi cates issued each month in semester 2 of 2011 was mostly higher than in semester 2 of 2012. Only in July and September of 2012 the issuance of new certifi cates was higher than in 2011. The diff erence of the number of certifi cates issued in 2011 and 2012 was seen quite big in July and September where on those months the issuance of permit was pretty much higher in 2012 than in 2011. This situation all at once shows that the number of telecommunication tool and equipment in 2012 was higher than in the previous year. More over, the tool and equipment that obtained standard certifi cate in semester 2 of 2012 was more compared to that in semester 2 of 2011, even though the diff erence was not too big.

Figure 8.7 Comparison of Monthly

Certifi cate Issuance according to Types of

Certifi cates in Semester 2 of 2011 and 2012

Month New Extension Revision Revision cum

Extension

2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012

January 288 322 16 18 29 17 24 0

February 316 260 43 41 12 18 5 0

March 388 300 21 68 16 69 1 0

April 288 369 47 57 16 13 7 0

May 399 518 49 38 11 16 3 0

June 392 372 46 85 4 36 15 0

July 393 451 25 75 2 5 6 0

August 427 358 58 47 1 15 18 0

September 291 374 28 59 1 7 4 0

October 509 408 20 75 0 9 9 0

November 474 471 46 76 5 12 9 0

December 531 465 43 65 1 32 11 0

Table 8.3. Monthly certifi cate

issuance according to types of certifi cates in

2011 and 2012

183


8.3.4. Certifi cate Issuance according to Country of Origin of EquipmentChina became the country of origin of tool and equipment whose standard certifi cates were the most issued in 2012. During 2012, it was recorded that 3292 standard certifi cates of testing result issued for telecommunication tool and equipment originating from China. This fi gure was slightly smaller than that in the previous year which achieved 3334. The countries with the next biggest number of tool and equipment certifi cates issued were Mexico, USA and Taiwan, but with far smaller number of certifi cates issued than that for the equipment originating from China. The emergence of Mexico as the second biggest country whose tool and equipment obtained certifi cates was a bit beyond the customary considering that in the previous years it was usually dominated by USA, Japan and Taiwan. Given that Mexico now becomes the location of vendors manufacturing wireless customer equipment (CPE) as the extension of location in USA, there are plenty wireless customer equipment (CPE) products from Mexico that enter Indonesia even though Mexico is not the country of origin of such product brands. However, the number of equipment certifi cates issued for those three countries was still less than 350 or far below the number of certifi cates issued for the tool and equipment originating from China.

The dominance of standard certifi cate issuance of tool and equipment from China in this 2012 shown from the proportion of certifi cate issuance of tool and equipment according to country of origin. From the total of 5621 certifi cates of tool and equipment issued in 2012, around 58.6% represents the standard certifi cates of tool and equipment originating from China. Although it was

Table 8.4. Composition of Certifi cates according to Types of Certifi cates andCountries of Origin in 2012

Country of Origin New Extension Revision Revision cum

Extension Total

China 3023 182 87 0 3292 Mexico 286 25 34 0 345 USA 265 31 5 0 301 Taiwan 181 27 15 0 223 Japan 168 29 12 0 209 Malaysia 99 3 9 0 111 South Korea 82 15 11 0 108 Sweden 60 25 3 0 88 Canada 62 22 24 0 108 Vietnam 76 17 9 0 102 Germany 57 13 5 0 75 Italy 53 19 2 0 74 Hungary 49 11 16 0 76 England 46 24 0 0 70 Hong Kong 45 5 7 0 57 Indonesia 45 3 1 0 49 Other 241 60 32 0 333

4838 511 272 0 5621

184


much bigger than the proportion of certifi cates issued for tool and equipment originating from other countries, this proportion was decreased compared to that in 2011 which achieved 62.3%. Meanwhile, the proportion of tool and equipment certifi cates issued for wireless customer equipment (CPE) originating from Mexico represent only 6.1% and standard certifi cate for tool and equipment originating from USA and Taiwan were only 5.4% and 4% respectively. The proportion of certifi cates issued for standard tool and equipment from Indonesia was also only 0.9%, lower than that in 2011 which achieved 1.2%. This indicates still lack of production of telecommunication tool and equipment originating from Indonesia which submitted for obtaining certifi cates. In fact, the increase of sale of telecommunication products, particularly customer equipment is an opportunity for telecommunication tool and equipment product originating from Indonesia to enter into the market and for that it has to be supported by certifi cation of tool and equipment.

If viewed from the proportion of the respective types of certifi cates, the certifi cate issuance of standard tool and equipment from China was also very dominant for new certifi cates. The proportion of certifi cate issuance of standard tool and equipment from China for new certifi cates only achieved 62.5%. This proportion was decreased compared to that in 2011 which achieved 65.4%. In the meantime, for revised certifi cate and extended certifi cate, even though their proportion was the highest among tool and equipment from other countries, the proportion of revised certifi cates for tool and equipment from China only achieved 32% and for extended certifi cate only achieved 35.6%. For extended certifi cates, the tool and equipment which had quite a number of certifi cates issued were the tool and

Figure 8.8. Distribution of certifi cates

issued in 2012 according to Countries of Origin of

Equipment

185


equipment originating from USA (6.1%), Japan (5.7%) and Taiwan (5.3%). Meanwhile, revised certifi cates which pretty much issued besides from China were customer equipment (CPE) certifi cates originating from Mexico (12.5%), Taiwan (5.5%) and Hong Kong (5.9%).

The proportion of certifi cate issuance according to the country of origin and types of tool and equipment showed that certifi cate issuance for tool and equipment from China was only dominant for the type of Cabled customer equipment (CPE) and Wireless customer equipment (CPE). In the meantime, for the types of Central equipment the proportion was not too dominant although still the biggest compared to other countries. The proportion of certifi cate issuance of tool and equipment for the type of Cabled customer equipment (CPE) achieved 68% and for Wireless customer equipment (CPE) achieved 68.7%. This proportion was slightly increased than the position as at semester 1 of 2012. For Cabled customer equipment (CPE), other countries of origin with the next biggest proportion were Malaysia and USA, but with the proportion of only 6.9% and 5% respectively. Meanwhile, for Wireless customer equipment (CPE), the next biggest proportion was for equipment from Mexico and Taiwan with the proportion of only 7.7% and 4.4% respectively. In the meantime, for transmission equipment, the proportion of equipment from China whose certifi cates were issued achieved 41.8%. In this group of transmission equipment, the suffi ciently big proportion of standard certifi cates issuance was from USA with the proportion of 16.7%, and Sweden with the proportion of 7.5%.

Figure 8.9. Proportion of Certifi cate Issuance according to Countries of Origin in 2012

186


Unlike the types of CPE customer equipment (cabled and wireless) and transmission equipment, for equipment types of Central and Broadcasting, certifi cate issuance for equipment from China was not too dominant. For the equipment types of Central, certifi cate issuance of equipment from China was only 24%, while equipment from Japan achieved 18% and equipment from Sweden achieved 13%. Even for the equipment type of Broadcasting, there was no certifi cate issuance for equipment from China. For broadcasting equipment, the certifi cates issuance was dominated by equipment originating from Italy and USA with the proportion achieving 50% and 12.5% respectively. This shows that for broadcasting type of equipment, the equipment that entered Indonesia not much came from China as other types of equipment.

8.3.5. Fluctuation of Monthly Certifi cate IssuanceThe issuance of standard certifi cates of tool and equipment originating from China was also very dominant each month. In average, within a month 292 standard certifi cates were issued for equipment from China or higher than that in 2011 which was only 272 certifi cates. Meanwhile, for tool and equipment from Mexico, in average there were only around 28 standard certifi cates issued and for equipment from USA only 23 certifi cates. The highest certifi cates issued for tool and equipment from China was in Quarter 2, particularly supported by certifi cates issuance in the month of May and June. May and June were the month where the most certifi cates for tool and equipment from China issued. Total standard certifi cates for tool and equipment from China issued in this quarter achieved 1168 certifi cates or 33.4% of the total standard certifi cates for tool and equipment from China.

Figure 8.10. Proportion of

Certifi cate Issuance according to Countries

of Origin in 2012

Unlike the types of COE customer equipment (cabled and wireless) and transmission equipment, for equipment types of Central and Broadcasting, certifi cates issuance for equipment from China was not too dominant.

187


8.4. Trade Balance of Telecommunication Tool and Equipment

Certifi cation of telecommunication tool and equipment that will be entering Indonesia is a proof of passing with the standard of equipment to be used in Indonesia. Standardization is required to ensure that the telecommunication tool and equipment entering Indonesia have met the established standard of tool and equipment to be used in the territory of Indonesia. The issuance of large amount of standardized certifi cates for a type of tool and equipment implicitly shows the high import for that type of telecommunication tool and equipment. The trade balance of telecommunication equipment shows the export and import of telecommunication equipment from and to Indonesia. This information provides a picture about the size of export and especially the import of telecommunication equipment to Indonesia that requires the attention of the Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment

Trade balance of Indonesian telecommunication equipment since 2006s shows a balance of trade which was positive at the beginning with gap trend that was getting smaller until fi nally it became negative since 2008. Up to the year 2007, the trade of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment was actually still surplus where export of telecommunication equipment both its value and weight, was still higher than the import as shown in table 8.5. This demonstrates that up to 2007, the performance of industry and trade of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment in international market was still quite good.

Country Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

China 170 296 264 346 394 428 320 268 307 251 309 146 Mexico 3 23 20 38 36 53 33 28 20 27 31 22 USA 10 38 19 25 43 35 16 8 26 23 22 14 Taiwan 5 32 20 34 20 34 14 10 16 23 13 6 Japan 8 20 17 19 20 28 16 24 9 20 20 11 Malaysia 5 4 17 10 8 27 13 9 6 3 6 3 South Korea 13 19 7 21 4 8 3 5 7 8 7 2

Sweden 3 12 5 13 7 20 12 0 7 9 1 4 Canada 0 11 3 33 14 12 6 1 0 5 3 2 Vietnam 4 8 4 4 10 18 5 14 6 9 4 0 Germany 3 3 6 1 10 9 9 3 11 3 1 2 Italy 1 22 10 4 8 2 1 4 2 3 0 1 Hungary 0 16 6 10 3 11 2 0 1 1 3 3 Hong Kong 0 3 2 2 3 6 17 5 0 2 5 2 England 3 1 8 12 3 6 1 2 2 4 3 1 Indonesia 3 6 3 1 7 3 11 4 1 5 1 0 Other 7 47 18 31 37 27 26 15 15 11 30 9 Total 238 561 429 604 627 727 505 400 436 407 459 228

Table 8.5. Distribution of monthly certifi cate issuance according to countries of origin of equipment in 2012

188


In 2008, the export value of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment actually still increased by 32%. But, at the same time the import of telecommunication tool and equipment to Indonesia also increased by 70.3%, so that the trade performance of telecommunication equipment showed defi cit where the total export was still lower than the total import. However, this year, the diff erence of export and import value of telecommunication tool and equipment was actually still very small. Even from its volume, the export weight of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment was still bigger than its import. Furthermore, up to year 2011, export of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment was still getting increased with average increase of 39.7% per year. But, at the same time, the import was also getting increased with the growth higher than the export. Import of telecommunication products to Indonesia during the period of 2008 – 2011 increased by 61.1%. Hence, the gap between the export and import was also getting bigger and trade balance of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment was getting negative.

Entering 2012, there was a sharp decline in the export of telecommunication tool and equipment with a decline achieving 52.1%. At the same time, import of telecommunication products to Indonesia actually also experienced a decline. But, the decline of import of telecommunication tool and equipment in 2012 was only 8.3%. Thus, the decline in export was till much bigger than the decline in import so that the trade balance of Indonesian telecommunication tool and equipment was also becoming negative. This, all at once, indicates that trade performance of telecommunication tool and equipment showed the condition which was not so good after having improvement in 2011.

Entering 2012, although equally experiencing a decline, the decline in export was still much greater than the decline in import so that trade balance of Indonesian telecommunication equipment in 2012 was also becoming negative.

Export Import

Value (US$)

Weight (kg)

Value (US$)

Weight (kg)

2006 912.615.463 63.646.802 209.462.317 22.769.222

2007 791.072.473 61.144.702 664.248.080 18.671.184

2008 1.044.207.325 55.282.207 1.130.915.894 20.398.992

2009 1.886.732.217 42.314.730 2.503.657.803 48.611.492

2010 2.310.105.995 56.333.735 3.619.695.162 62.600.497

2011 2.681.090.192 66.745.199 4.246.802.605 55.264.763

2012 1.284.076.360 28.578.023 3.893.405.777 51.044.989

Table 8.6. Export and Import of

Telecommunication Tools and Equipment

in 2006 – 2012

189


Figure 8.11 shows that up to 2009, export of telecommunication tool and equipment still showed positive growth trend. But, entering 2010, the growth rate was getting smaller although still showing positive growth. In 2011 declining growth trend still continued. Meanwhile, import value in fact experienced increasing growth trend up to 2009 and despite having a declining growth entering 2010, the decline was not as big as the export.

Export growth was a bit better and underwent a slight decline in 2011. This situation is shown in a more sloping graph. On the contrary, the growth of import value of telecommunication and information technology products became lower compared to those of the previous years. The graph of the decline in the import growth of telecommunication and information technology product in this year of 2011 was also much sharper compared to the decline in the export growth. However, entering the year of 2012, the export experience negative growth and its value declined quite sharp compared to that in 2012. Import of telecommunication products also experienced a decline, but its declining trend was not as sharp as the decline in export.

Figure 8.11. Growth Trend of Export and Import of Telecommunication Equipment in 2006-2012

190


191


9CHAPTER

192


193


9.1. Scope

Statistical data of tool/equipment testing will present performance data of Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT) according to its tasks and functions. The data which will be presented includes data of test result recapitulation (RHU) on the tool/equipment testing done and Payment Oder Letter (SP2) on the tests done. These two instruments are issued by BBPPT as the organizer of equipment testing at Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology. Any telecommunication and information technology tool/equipment that comes into Indonesia must fulfi ll technical requirement which is measured by the testing before being used and traded in Indonesia, to check its compatibility with the standard set in Indonesia. Testing data information of the tool/equipment consists of name of applicant, name of tools, brand/type, country of origin, and information of the number and date of testing. Testing is carried out on any equipment submitted by diff erent applicants of the testing. Testing on the tool and equipment submitted by the applicant will further be conducted by BBPPT. This means that although the type of tool/equipment tested is the same, as long as the testing applicant is diff erent, testing still has to be conducted.

TESTING OFTELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT

CHAPTER 9

194


In the fi rst part, the data presented are data of test result recapitulation on the testing done to telecommunication tools and equipment by BBPPT. The presentation comprises the number of monthly and annual testing, and the number of equipment tested according to the group type of the equipment and country of origin. The second part of data presentation is the amount of invoice for testing service mentioned in the Payment Order Letter (SP2). Data used is derived from data of SP2 handling which provides information on the name of applicant, name of equipment, brand/type, country of origin, received date, type of equipment, amount of payment and payment date. In general, the scope of statistical data presentation of this equipment testing is as follows:1) RHU in 2012 according to:

a. country of origin of equipmentb. group of types of equipment

2) Comparison of RHU (test result recapitulation) of semester 2 in 2010 - 2012

3) SP2 in 2012 according to:a. country of origin of equipmentb. group of types of equipment

4) Comparison of SP2 in 2010 - 2012


Some concepts and defi nitions contained in the data presentation about Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory are as follows:• Testing process is one of testing processes on telecommunication tools/

equipment in Indonesia by BBPPT. This process is started with the issuance of equipment testing order letter (SP3) by Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment, and then submitted by the applicant (owner of equipment) completed with the necessary requirements to BBPPT. The application will then be reviewed for the completeness of testing requirements. After having been declared complete, BBPPT will issue SP2 which has to be paid by the applicant and afterwards testing on the tools/equipment will be carried out according to the type of equipment.

• Test Result Recapitulation (RHU) is recapitulation of test results on the equipment tested by BBPPT and documented as data to be submitted to Directorate of Standardization of Postal and Information and Communication Technology Equipment

195


• Payment Order Letter (SP2) is a letter that instructs the owner of equipment tested at BBPPT to pay the cost of testing implementation according to the applicable rate.

9.3. Statistics of Equipment Testing

Statistics of telecommunication tools/equipment testing will present statistical data and analysis on achievement of main activities carried out by Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory. Those two activities are testing activities of telecommunication tools and equipment shown in the form of Test Result Recapitulation (RHU) on incoming tool/equipment of post and information technology and carried out by Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory. The second activity is the issuance of Payment Order Letter (SP2) on charges emanating from testing conducted as Non-Tax State Income (PNBP) for Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory.

9.3.1. Test Result Recapitulation (RHU)Data of Test Result Recapitulation (RHU) on telecommunication equipment testing carried out during semester 2 of 2012 at Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT) shows an increase of the number of telecommunication tools and equipment tested at BBPPT. Compared with the number of tests carried out during semester 2 of 2010 and 2011, testing of telecommunication tools and equipment during the fi rst four months in semester 2 of 2012 was higher than that in the semester of 2011 even though the increase was not many. But, testing of telecommunication tools and equipment in the months of November and December of 2011 was still higher than that in the same months of 2012. In total, the number of RHU in semester 2 of 2012 increased by only 1.8% compared to that in semester 2 of 2011. This increase was much lower than the increase occurred in semester 2 of 2011 and semester 2 of 2010, which achieved 22.8% and 25.1% respectively. This low increase was particularly due to the number of testing which reduced in the months of November and December. Unlike the condition in semester 2 of 2010 and 2011, testing activity in semester 2 of 2012 was mostly done in the month of January and then in October. Meanwhile, in semester 2 of 2011 testing was in fact mostly done in the months of November and December. In general, testing activity in 2012 was more fl uctuated each month.

196


9.3.2. Testing Result of Equipment According to Countries of OriginThe distribution of testing activities in 2012 according to countries of origin of equipment shows that telecommunication tools/equipment mostly tested in 2012 were tools/equipment originating from China the number of which achieved 2505 units. This position is the same as those occurred in the previous years where tools/equipment originating from China dominated postal, telecommunication and information technology equipment tested at BBPPT. The number of tools/equipment from China tested in 2012 also increased by 10.1% compared to the number of tools/equipment from China which were tested in 2011. Compared to telecommunication and information technology tools/equipment originating from other countries, the number of tools/equipment from China which were tested at BBPPT was much bigger. The next most tested were tools/equipment from Japan and USA, but with the number of only 132 units and 117 units respectively, followed by Taiwan as many as 103 units. Outside those three countries, the number of tools/equipment tested during 2012 only less than 100 units for each country.

Figure 9.1. Comparison of the number

of equipment tested in Semester 2 of 2010, 2011,

and 2012

1

1

2

2

3

3

2

2

2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Ju

2010 25

2011 21

2012 30

li Agu

52 26

18 27

01 27

stus Sept

62 1

73 2

75 2

ember Ok

144 1

255 2

279 2

ktober Nop

194

276

299

pember De

292

346

268

esember

217

303

279

Negara Bulan

Total Jan Feb Mar Apr Mei Jun Jul Agst Sept Okt Nov Des

China 304 182 185 150 226 194 238 204 188 235 192 207 2505

Jepang 14 3 4 8 22 11 8 18 17 5 11 11 132

USA 7 8 13 12 11 21 11 2 7 7 9 9 117

Taiwan 10 10 3 7 12 16 7 11 3 10 7 7 103

Korea Selatan 3 9 12 3 9 8 8 1 7 4 9 6 79

Vietnam 7 1 3 3 9 5 7 8 5 3 9 11 71

Malaysia 2 7 3 5 8 2 2 6 7 6 5 3 56

Jerman 0 4 2 2 0 4 8 0 4 8 8 4 44

Indonesia 6 2 1 5 2 4 2 2 9 4 2 4 43

Italia 8 4 4 3 8 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 36

Thailand 1 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 4 2 0 7 22

Kanada 1 0 3 3 3 0 2 3 1 1 0 2 19

Lainnya 10 15 26 18 14 14 7 19 25 12 15 6 181

Total 373 245 259 219 329 282 301 275 279 299 268 279 3408

Table 9.1. Test Result Recapitulation of

Telecommunication Tools/Equipment

according to Countries of Origin in 2012

197


The great number of equipment from China for which testing was done in 2011 was also spread over the twelve months so that in each month, the number of telecommunication tools/equipment mostly tested was tools/equipment from China. In average, nearly 209 telecommunication tools/equipment from China were tested each month. Even for the fi rst quarter, 224 units of tools/equipment in average were achieved in the testing each month, while the number of tools/ equipment from Japan tested in 2012, at the average of only 11 units were tested each month and equipment from USA were tested only 10 units each month.

This distribution of equipment testing which was very dominated by telecommunication equipment from China was seen from the composition of tools/equipment testing according to countries of origin as shown in fi gure 9.2. From the total of 3032 telecommunication tools/equipment tested at Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory, around 73.5% were telecommunication tools/equipment from China. Despite the increased number compared to that in 2011, the proportion of equipment from China tested in 2012 reduced compared to that in 2011 which achieved 75&. In the meantime, the proportion of tools/equipment from Japan and USA, only 3.9% and 3.4% of the total tools/equipment tested respectively. Among the tools/equipment tested at Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory, there were also equipment from Indonesia, but the proportion of equipment from Indonesia tested at BBPPT in 2012 was still very low, i.e. only 1.3%. This composition of equipment tested according to country of origin more and more explained that telecommunication tools/equipment started to be extremely dominated by the equipment from China.

China, 73.5%

Jepang, 3.9% USA, 3.4%

Taiwan, 3.0%

Korea Selatan, 2.3%

Vietnam, 2.1%Malaysia, 1.6%

Jerman, 1.3%

Indonesia, 1.3%

Italia, 1.1%

Thailand, 0.6%Kanada, 0.6%

Lainnya, 5.3%

Other, 8.8%

Figure 9.2. Composition of tools/equipment tested at BBPPT according to Countries of Origin in 2012

The number of tools/equipment from China which were tested in 2012 also increased by 10.1% compared to the number of tools/equipment from China which were tested in 2011. This increase further shows that telecommunication tools/equipment is becoming dominated by tools/equipment from China.

198


9.3.3. Result of Equipment Testing According to Types of Equipment The distribution of equipment tested at BBPPT according to types of equipment as indicated in Table 9.2 shows that telecommunication tools/equipment mostly entering Indonesia and testing carried out on them were cellular telephones. Moreover, this number of cellular telephones for which testing was done at BBPPT was far bigger than other telecommunication tools/equipment. During 2012, the number of incoming cellular telephones for which testing was done achieved 1358. This number reduced by 15.7% compared to that in 2011 which achieved 1610 testing. Meanwhile, the second most telecommunication tools/equipment undergoing testing was WLAN which only less than 278. For WLAN equipment, the number of equipment tested experienced an increase compared to that in 2011.

The high number of equipment in the form of cellular telephones entering Indonesia for which testing was done took place every month throughout the year. The average number of incoming cellular telephones for which testing was done by BPPPT achieved 113 units per month with the highest number of 198 units occurring in January. In the meantime, the average number of WLAN and Printer as telecommunication equipment undergoing quite many testing was only 23 units and 14 units respectively each month. In the last few years, cellular telephones continued the trend of becoming telecommunication tools/equipment entering Indonesia for which testing was carried out. The increasing growth of cellular telephone technology and operation system of cellular telephone are followed by the increase in the type and vendor of cellular telephone which enter Indonesia. This resulted in the growing number of cellular telephone entering Indonesia and the number of testing done. The large population of Indonesia with varied strata of economy forms an attractive market for t producers and vendors of telephone cellular to off er their products in Indonesia with various kinds and price classes, and also various operation system used.

Jenis Perangkat Bulan

Total Jan Feb Mar Apr Mei Jun Jul Agst Sept Okt Nov Des

Ponsel 198 114 115 86 124 133 123 93 99 110 79 84 1358

WLAN 27 38 9 16 30 18 12 20 23 13 40 32 278

Printer 0 2 8 2 25 2 43 30 12 15 7 25 171

Bluetooth 19 5 4 4 25 8 12 11 9 5 16 8 126

Antenna 6 2 8 15 10 7 11 5 3 4 20 11 102

Modem 14 3 11 5 7 11 6 9 4 8 7 9 94

HT (Komrad) 10 5 5 8 9 5 1 17 8 8 9 4 89

Tablet PC 2 2 6 1 12 9 6 1 2 16 5 10 72

Personal Access Network 4 1 6 1 2 6 3 1 3 3 7 7 44

Low Power 21 5 4 0 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 37

Radio Microwave 3 7 3 3 1 4 2 1 0 4 4 0 32

Router 0 3 2 3 3 0 2 4 0 2 1 11 31

Faksimili 12 10 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 28

GPS 3 2 1 3 1 0 1 5 3 4 1 2 26

TV Siaran 4 1 4 2 5 0 2 1 1 5 0 1 26

Lainnya 50 45 70 70 72 78 75 77 111 100 71 75 894

Total 373 245 259 219 329 282 301 275 279 299 268 279 3408

Table 9.2. Test Result Recapitulation of Equipment according to

Types of Equipment in 2012

199


The dominance of cellular telephones among telecommunication tools/equipment that underwent testing at BBPPT is seen in the composition of tools/equipment tested according to types of equipment in 2012. The proportion of cellular telephones vis-à-vis the total telecommunication tools/equipment tested at BBPPT achieved 39.8%. This proportion actually experienced quite big decrease compared to that in 2011 which achieved 53.1%. Meanwhile, for WLAN and Printer which became the second and third most tested equipment, their proportion achieved only 8.2% and 5% respectively. The telecommunication tools/equipment that many of them were attached to cellular telephones and or used by the public, i.e. Bluetooth and Modem also had a relatively high proportion compared to that of other tools/equipment with the proportion achieving 3.7%. Compared to the year of 2011, the composition the types of equipment tested at BBPPT in this 2012 was relatively distributed than in 2011 which was highly dominated by several types of telecommunication and information technology equipment only.

The big proportion of telecommunication tools/equipment originating from China as the equipment mostly underwent testing in 2012 also occurred in nearly all types of equipment. Among various types of equipment for which testing was conducted, the tools/equipment originating from China dominated almost all types of equipment. Tools/equipment from China was not dominant only on the type of equipment of Microwave Radio and Broadcast TV. For Microwave Radio equipment, the proportion of the equipment originating from China which underwent testing at Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory only reached 9.4%. Even for Broadcast TV type of equipment, the proportion of the equipment originating from China which underwent testing to enter Indonesia only 3.8%. Microwave Radio

Figure 9.3. Composition of equipment tested according to Types of Equipment in 2012

Ponsel, 39.8%

WLAN, 8.2%

Printer, 5.0%

Bluetooth, 3.7%

Antenna, 3.0%

Modem, 2.8%

HT (Komrad), 2.6%Tablet PC, 2.1%

Personal Access Network, 1.3% Low Power, 1.1%

Radio Microwave, 0.9%Router, 0.9%

Faksimili, 0.8%GPS, 0.8%

TV Siaran, 0.8%

Lainnya, 26.2%Other, 30.4%

200


type of equipment originated from several countries, while Broadcast TV type of equipment mostly entered were the equipment from USA and some other countries.

However, for telecommunication tools/equipment predominantly used by the public, the telecommunication tools/equipment from China entering Indonesia and underwent testing were precisely very dominant. For the type of tools/equipment of cellular telephones, from the total of 1358 cellular telephones entering Indonesia and underwent testing in 2012, around 93.5% of them came from China. For telecommunication tools/equipment used by large customers, such as printer, bluetooth, and modem, the equipment from China also showed a big proportion. For Printer type of equipment, from the total of 105 units tested, 80% of them were various kinds of printer from China, while for modem and bluetooth, from the total of 96 modems and 126 bluetooth tested, 78.7% were modem and 66.7% were bluetooth from China.

During 2012, from the total of 1610 cellular telephones entering Indonesia and undergoing testing, around 93.5% were cellular telephones from China. For other consumer product type of tools/equipment largely used by public such as printer, modem, and bluetooth, which underwent testing, they were also dominated by product from China.

Jenis Perangkat Negara Asal

Total Kanada China Jerman Indonesia Italia Jepang Korea Selatan Malaysia Taiwan Thailand USA Vietnam Lainnya

Antenna 0 58 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 20 0 17 102 Bluetooth 1 84 2 0 0 12 5 5 7 7 1 0 2 126 Faksimili 0 20 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 28 GPS 0 13 0 1 0 2 0 3 3 0 1 0 3 26 HT (Komrad) 0 56 0 0 0 5 0 17 2 0 0 0 9 89 Low Power 0 29 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 Personal Access Network 0 36 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 44

Ponsel 4 1270 0 2 1 0 31 1 14 0 0 23 12 1358 Printer 0 84 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 11 0 105 Radio Microwave 0 3 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 15 32 Router 1 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 33 Tablet PC 0 71 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 TV Siaran 0 1 2 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 26 WLAN 3 190 0 1 0 8 9 5 26 4 20 1 6 278 Modem 0 74 0 1 0 2 1 0 6 0 5 0 5 94 Lainnya 10 560 34 29 13 98 24 19 48 11 63 36 101 1050

Total 19 2505 44 43 36 132 79 56 103 22 117 71 181 3408

Table 9.3. Number of Equipment tested according to Types of Equipment and Countries of Origin in 2012

201


9.3.4. Comparison between Testing Result and Issuance of Equipment Certifi cates

Comparison between testing result of tools/equipment and issuance of standard certifi cates of tools/equipment tested shows the existence of suffi ciently big diff erence every month. Table 9.4 shows in total and in every month, that the number of standard certifi cates for the type of new certifi cates issued on incoming equipment to Indonesia was bigger than the number of equipment for which testing was done at Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory based on Test Result Recapitulation data. The total of new standard certifi cates issued during 2012 was 2668, while the number of telecommunication tools/equipment that underwent testing at the same period was only 3404. This big diff erence besides due to the existence of time leg between the fi nishing of testing result and the certifi cate issuance, hence a part of the equipment certifi cates issued also included the testing result of the previous period. Besides, there was also the issuance of standard certifi cates done without the process of equipment testing but only performed testing on the document of such products (document testing). Only in January the number of tools/equipment tested was higher than the standard certifi cates issued. This was due to the testing process continued testing the remaining equipment of the previous years.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

56

1

19

6.9%

66.7% 71.4%

.0%

0.0%0.0%

9.6%

0.8%

0.0%

%

50.0%

62.9%

78.

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.03.8%

0.0%

0.0

.4% 81.8%

93.5%

0%

0.0%

0.1%

0%

0.0%

0.0%

80.0%

9.4%

78.8

0.0%

21.9%

0.0

0.0%

12.5%

12.1

8%

98.6%

3.8%

0%

0.0%

53.8%

1%

0.0%

15.4%

68.3%78.7%

53.3

0.0%

0.0%

1.2%

7.2% 5.3%

6.0%

%

%

%Lainny

Vietna

USA

Thaila

Taiwa

Malay

Korea

Jepang

Italia

Indone

Jerma

China

Kanad

ya

am

nd

n

sia

Selatan

g

esia

n

da

Figure 9.4. Composition of the Number of Equipment tested according to Types of Equipment and Countries of Origin in 2012

202


9.4. Payment Order Letter (SP2) for Testing

9.4.1. Number of SP2 Issuance according to Countries of OriginIn addition to carrying out testing the result of which is incorporated in the form of Test Result Recapitulation, Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory also issues Payment Order Letter (SP2) on the charges of testing service done for the tested tools/equipment. During 2012, 3777 SP2 were issued from tools/equipment testing done at the end of 2011 and from tools/equipment testing done in 2012. Total SP2 issued in 2012 increased by 6.4% of SP2 issued in 2011. The total income derived from the issuance of SP2 in 2012 achieved Rp. 26.797 billion or each SP2 has an average value of Rp 7.094 (7.05) million. The total value of income from SP2 payment in 2012 also increased by 7.1% compared to total income of SP2 payent in 2011 which achieved Rp 25.025 billion. In the meantime, the average value of SP2 per certifi cate issued in 2012 also increased by 0.6% compared to that in 2011. During the year 2012, the most of the number SP2 issued in May.

As the most of the number of SP2 were issued in the month of May, the highest revenue from the issuance of SP2 was also took place in May. The large number of SP2 issued tended to be followed by the

Bulan Rekapitulasi Hasil Uji

Penerbitan Sertikat Baru

Januari 373 322 Februari 245 260 Maret 259 300 April 219 369 Mei 329 518 Juni 282 372 Juli 301 451 Agustus 275 358 September 279 374 Oktober 299 408

Nopember 268 471 Desember 279 465

No Bulan Jumlah SP2

Nilai Pembayaran (Rp)

Rata-Rata nilai per SP2

(Rp)

1 Januari 271 2,010,500,000 7,418,819 2 Februari 282 2,091,500,000 7,416,667

3 Maret 264 1,898,500,000 7,191,288

4 April 310 1,967,000,000 6,345,161 5 Mei 366 2,750,000,000 7,513,661 6 Juni 336 2,337,000,000 6,955,357 7 Juli 359 2,299,000,000 6,403,900 8 Agustus 303 2,084,000,000 6,877,888 9 September 342 2,568,500,000 7,510,234

10 Oktober 364 2,619,000,000 7,195,055 11 November 264 1,964,000,000 7,439,394 12 Desember 316 2,208,000,000 6,987,342

Total 3777 26,797,000,000 7,094,784

Table 9.4. Comparison between Test

Result Recapitulation (RHU) and Standard Certifi cate Issuance

Table 9.5. Number and Value of Payment Order Letter (SP2) Handling in

2012

203


large amount of revenue from SP2 payment such as occurred in the month of October. The fl uctuation of the number of SP2 issued and the value of SP2 received every month shows that more issuance of SP2 was not always followed by more revenue received from SP2. Although the number of SP2 issuance was more in April compared to the number in January or February, yet the value of revenue from SP2 in April was smaller than that of January and February. This diff erence could occur due to the infl uence of the types of tools/equipment tested in that month. Telecommunication tools/equipment of certain types were levied with higher testing charges compared to other telecommunication tools/equipment, so that in the month where there were many tested tools/equipment with higher testing charges, the value of the revenue from SP2 would also be higher.

Just as the high number of equipment undergoing testing, so was the number of SP2 issued in semester 2 of 2012 which was higher than the number of SP2 issued in semester 2 of the previous years even though the diff erence was not big. The total number of SP2 issued during semester 2 of 2012 achieved 1948 or only increased by 1.2% compared to the number of SP2 issued during semester 2 of 2011. The increase in the number of SP2 in this semester 2 was considerably declined than the increase in the number of SP2 in 2011 which increased by 42.7% compared to semester 2 of 2010. The average number of monthly SP2 issuance during semester 2 of 2012 achieved 3245, while the number of monthly issuance during semester 2 of 2011 was 320 and even during semester 2 of 2009, the number was only 224 per month. The lowest number of SP2 issuance in semester 2 of 2012 occurred only in the month of November. In fact, in November 2011, SP2 issuance was precisely relatively higher compared to other months.

Ju

Ni

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

mlah SP2

lai (Rp. Juta)

Jan Feb Ma

271 282 26

2,0 2,0 1,

ar Apr Mei

64 310 366

,8 1,9 2,7

Jun Jul Ag

336 359 30

2,3 2,2 2,

gt Sep Okt

03 342 364

,0 2,5 2,6

Nov Des

264 316

1,9 2,2

Figure 9.5. Fluctuation of the Number and Value of Revenue from SP2 in 2012

204


9.4.2. Issuance of SP2 According to Countries of OriginThe value of payment of SP2 according to country of origin also shows that the largest revenue of SP2 came from the tools/ equipment of China because the number of SP2 issued for tools/equipment from China was far higher than the tools/equipment from other countries. The total revenue of SP2 from the tools/equipment of China in 2011 achieved Rp. 20.974 (19.4) billion or its contribution was 78.3% vis-à-vis the total revenue from SP2 in 2012. SP2 revenue from tools/equipment of China in this 2012 increased by 8.1% compared to that in 2011. Its contribution to total revenue of SP2 also increased from that in 2011 which was 77.6%. In the meantime, the proportion of SP2 for equipment from USA which provided the second biggest contribution was only 3.1% and SP2 for tools/equipment from South Korea only contributed 2.9% of the total revenue of SP2. This case also shows a very big contribution of revenue from SP2 for telecommunication tools/equipment from China and very dominant in SP2 issuance for on tools/equipment from China compared to telecommunication tools/equipment originating from other countries.

The composition of the value of SP2 revenue according to countries of origin also shows that although the number of SP2 issued was more, it was not always that the value of SP2 resulted was also bigger. Although the number of SP2 for tools/equipment from Japan was more compared to tools/equipment from USA, Taiwan and South Korea, yet the fact shows that the total value of SP2 for tools/equipment from Japan was lower than the above three countries. The same case occurred in 2011. The same goes for the number of SP2 issuance for tools/equipment from Thailand which was more than SP2 of equipment from Canada and Italy, but in reality the value of SP2 revenue for equipment from

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

2

2

2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Jul2010 23

2011 33

2012 35

li Agu6 27

6 23

9 30

stus Septe77 1

38 3

03 34

ember Okt25 2

80 2

42 3

tober Nop214 2

272 3

364 2

pember De249

381

264

sember248

318

316

Figure 9.6. Comparison of SP2

Issuance per month in semester 2 of 2010,

2011, and2012

205


Thailand was lower than the value of SP2 revenue for equipment from those two countries. The average of the highest value of SP2 is found in the tools/equipment from South Korea, followed by tools/equipment from Vietnam. For the tools/equipment from China which were mostly cellular telephones and products used largely by the public at large such as Bluetooth and modem, the average value of revenue for each SP2 issued was high enough, i.e. Rp 7.48 million. This means that testing charges for telecommunication tools/equipment of consumer goodswere also high enough.

The composition of SP2 issuance according to countries of origin during 2012 shows the proportion of SP2 issuance for telecommunication tools/equipment from China was very big compared to tools/equipment from other countries. Around 74.3% of SP2 issued in 2012 were for telecommunication tools/equipment from China. The suffi ciently big proportion of SP2 issuance for equipment from other countries was not more than 5%. The proportion of certifi cate issuance for tools/equipment from Japan which was the second biggest was only 3.8% and for tools/equipment from USA and Taiwan, their proportion was 3.6% and 3% respectively. Other countries well-known as countries of origin manufacturing telecommunication tools/equipment which are widely used in Indonesia, particularly cellular telephones, such as Canada, its proportion was only 0.5% or lower than that in 2011 which achieved 0.8%. This data shows that cellular telephones entering Indonesia were not coming from the manufacturing countries of origin, but from the factories situated in other countries particularly China.

Table 9.6. Number and Value of SP2 Handling according to Countries of Origin in 2012

No Negara Jumlah SP2

Nilai Pembayaran

(Rp)

Rata-Rata nilai per SP2 (Rp)

1 China 2805 20,974,500,000 7,477,540 2 Jepang 144 562,500,000 3,906,250 3 USA 137 812,500,000 5,930,657 4 Taiwan 112 754,500,000 6,736,607 5 Korea Selatan 88 767,000,000 8,715,909 6 Vietnam 72 584,500,000 8,118,056 7 Malaysia 64 291,000,000 4,546,875 8 Indonesia 49 287,500,000 5,867,347 9 Jerman 48 216,500,000 4,510,417

10 Thailand 25 94,000,000 3,760,000 11 Italia 24 173,000,000 7,208,333 12 Inggris 22 105,500,000 4,795,455 13 Kanada 19 135,500,000 7,131,579 14 Hongkong 16 67,000,000 4,187,500 15 Lainnya 152 971,500,000 6,391,447

Total 3777 26,797,000,000 7,094,784

206


9.4.3. SP2 Issuance according to Type of EquipmentThe composition of SP2 issuance during 2012 just as the composition of equipment tested shows that it is extremely dominated by cellular telephones. From the total of 3777 SP2 issued during 2012, around 37.3% formed SP2 for cellular telephone equipment. This proportion was actually declined fairly large compared to that in 2011 where the proportion of cellular telephone achieved 50.8% of the total SP2 issued. Other telecommunication equipment the SP2 of which were quite largely issued were WLAN and Printer but their proportion was far less than that of cellular telephones, i.e. 8.5% and 4.4% respectively. The proportion of SP2 issuance for equipment also widely used by the public such as Bluetooth and Modem was also low, i.e. 3.6% and 2.5% respectively of the total SP2 issued as shown in fi gure 9.8.

China, 74.3%

Jepang, 3.8%USA, 3.6%

Taiwan, 3.0%

Korea Selatan, 2.3%

Vietnam, 1.9%

Malaysia, 1.7%

Indonesia, 1.3%

Jerman, 1.3%Thailand, 0.7%

Italia, 0.6%

Inggris, 0.6%Kanada, 0.5%

Hongkong, 0.4%

Lainnya, 4.0%

Other, 6.2%

Ponsel, 37.3%

WLAN, 8.5%

Printer, 4.4%

Bluetooth, 3.6%Tablet PC, 2.8%

Antenna, 2.7%Modem, 2.6% HT (Komrad), 2.1%

Switch, 1.6%

Personal Access

Network, 1.4%

Router, 1.4%TV Siaran, 0.8%

GPS, 0.8%IP Phone, 0.7%

Radio Microwave, 0.7%

Low Power, 0.7%

Mesin Multifungsi, 0.7%

Firewall, 0.5%

Lainnya, 26.6%Other, 30.7%

Figure 9.7. Composition of SP2

Issuance according to Countries of Origin in

2012

Figure 9.8. Composition of SP2

Issuance according to Types of Equipment in

2012

207


The proportion of SP2 issuance for telecommunication tools/equipment from China which was very big in 2012 also occurred for nearly all types of tools/equipment. Among various types of tools/equipment that underwent testing, the tools/equipment from China dominated nearly all types of tools/ equipment except Broadcast TV, Microwave radio and Firewall. The very big proportion especially could clearly be seen for tools/equipment widely used by the public at large such as cellular telephones, printer, Tablet PC including Bluetooth. For the equipment of telephone cellular type, from the total of 1409 cellular telephones for which SP2 was issued in 2012, around 93.3% were cellular telephones from China. For telecommunication tools/equipment widely used by large consumers, the equipment from China also shows the big proportion. For the equipment of printer type, from the total of 161 for which SP2 was issued, 83.7% were printer from China. In the meantime, for bluetooth and Tablet PC, of the total 136 bluetooth and 107 Tablet PC for which SP2 was issued, 68.4% were bluetooth from China and 98/1% were Tablet PC from China.

Table 9.7. Number of SP2 Issuance according to Types of Equipment and Countries of Origin in 2012

Perangkat Kanada China JermanHong-kong

Indonesia

Italia JepangKorea

SelatanMalay-

siaTaiwan

Thai-land

Inggris USAViet-nam

Lainnya Total

Ponsel 3 1315 1 1 2 1 0 34 1 13 0 1 1 26 10 1409WLAN 4 230 0 1 2 0 10 8 5 28 3 0 21 1 8 321Printer 0 139 0 0 4 0 2 5 2 0 3 0 0 11 0 166Bluetooth 1 93 2 3 3 0 10 7 5 4 6 0 0 0 2 136Tablet PC 0 105 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107Antenna 0 67 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 19 0 9 102Modem 0 81 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 6 0 0 2 0 6 99HT (Komrad) 0 51 0 0 0 0 3 0 18 2 0 1 0 0 4 79Switch 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60Personal Access Network 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 54Router 1 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 3 54TV Siaran 0 4 4 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 4 31GPS 0 16 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 1 0 3 30IP Phone 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 27Radio Microwave 0 4 1 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 27Low Power 0 14 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 25Mesin Multifungsi 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25Firewall 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 20Lainnya 10 490 36 8 34 8 107 23 28 33 11 18 77 30 92 1005

Total 19 2805 48 16 49 24 144 88 64 112 25 22 137 72 152 3777

Just like the tools/equipment testing, SP2 issuance of tools/equipment particularly telecommunication tools/equipment which began to be largely used was also dominated by tools/equipment from China. Out of 107 types of Tablet PC the SP2 of which were issued in 2012, 98.1% were Tablet PC from China.

208


9.5. Calibration Testing of Tools/equipment

The Offi ce of Telecommunication Equipment Testing Laboratory (BBPPT) also provides calibration testing service of the tools/equipment. During 2012, BBPPT conducted calibration testing on 38 postal and information technology tools/equipment. From the total of tools/equipment which underwent calibration testing, the most number was calibration testing for the type of spectrum analyzer tools/equipment i.e. 25 units. Other type of tools/equipment which underwent the most calibration testing was fi eld strength meter, but only 3 units.

From calibration testing performed, BBPPT also received income as service fee on the calibration testing done. During 2012, service fee in the amount of Rp. 79.75 million was received on this testing. Just like the type of tools/equipment which were mostly tested, the income of this calibration testing service was mostly from spectrum analyzer, i.e. Rp. 60 million. This means that for every spectrum analyzer tested, it was charged Rp. 2,500,000. The large amount of income from this calibration testing also shows that the testing fee for each type of tools/equipment is varied.

Tipe Jumlah Total Biaya (Rp)

Field Strength Meter 2 5,000,000

Frequency Counter 3 2,500,000

Handheld Spectrum Analyzer 1 2,500,000

Intelgent Counter 2 2,000,000

Measuring Receiver 1 2,500,000

Multimeter Digital 1 250,000

Oscilloscope 2 1,250,000

Power Meter 1 1,250,000

Receiver 1 2,500,000

Spectrum Analyzer 24 60,000,000

Total 38 79,750,000

Table 9.8. Number and Fee of Calibration Testing

according to types of equipment

209


10CHAPTER

210


211


Telecommunication sector which is based on the utilization of frequency resources and industrial subsector of equipment of post and information technology and their associated industries have been growing very rapidly and become one of the mainstays of economy sector. This sector has explicitly given signifi cant impact to the economy and employment when other sectors tend to be stagnant. This sector is growing very rapidly along with the use of telecommunication tools, equipment and means which is getting higher to serve a vast area. Although in the agrarian Indonesian economy contribution of this communication sector is still less than the primary sectors, the development of telecommunication industry has become a signifi cant part of economic transformation process from primary sector to secondary and tertiary sectors. Even for urban areas, the development of this telecommunication sector has become a signifi cant part of the development in service industry which in the future would become the main economic sector.

The rapid growth of the industry which has basis of resources and equipment of post and information technology as the economic subsector can be seen from its role which is progressively increasing in the economic structure. It automatically aff ects not only the output contribution but also the employment, and even the proportion of household income spent in this telecommunication sector. From government side, this growth was also marked by contribution

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF RESOURCESAND EQUIPMENT OF POSTAL ANDINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

CHAPTER 10

212


to state revenue from government services provided in telecommunication sector.

10.1 Scope

Economic analysis of statistical data of this resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector would review the role of the activity and industry in the resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector, including services provided by government in supporting the development and utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology on the national economy.

These role and contribution can be seen from two aspects. First, contribution of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (SDPPI) to state revenue through Non-Tax State Revenue (Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak/PNBP) generated from the provision of supporting services by working units at Directorate General of SDPPI to postal and telecommunication industry and to auction of resources of information and technology sector. PNBP of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology sector is non-tax state revenue resulted by working units at Directorate General of SDPPI. PNBP from those activities includes PNBP from the issuance of telecommunication equipment certifi cate (including Non-Tax State Revenue on cost of testing telecommunication equipment), PNBP from Frequency which consists of PNBP from BHP Frequency, PNBP from Radio Operator Certifi cation which consists of PNBP from REOR, SKOR, IAR, and IKRAP, and PNBP from other sources. PNBP from resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector becomes part of state revenue which entered into domestic revenue post on other PNBP posts. Thus, PNBP from resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector also helps strengthen domestic revenue particularly non-tax revenue.

The second aspect is contribution from the activity in postal, telecommunication and information technology sector to domestic revenue as refl ected by National Gross Domestic Product/GDP (Produk Domestik Bruto/PDB). GDP is the output indicator of all economic activities undertaken by a country in the economic sectors of that country, including transportation and communication sector. Meanwhile, contribution from resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector is in the form of output resulting from the activities of resources and equipment of postal and information technology

213


(telecommunication) services which contribute to national output. However, in this analysis, contribution from communication sector has not included output from telecommunication manufacturing industry or the industry that produces telecommunication equipment, which is put under the output of manufacturing industry sector.

The source of this analysis came from Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology in the form of PNBP data produced from the activity at each work unit (Satuan Kerja/Satker) at the Directorate General of SDPPI. Meanwhile, the comparison data for state revenue is the data coming from Fiscal Policy Authority of Ministry of Finance for state revenue data generated from each revenue source. For output analysis of telecommunication service sector, the data source came from Central Statistics Body for GDP data based on the business fi eld and business sector. This overall data consists of published and unpublished data.


In this economic statistical analysis, some terms used and the explanations are as follows:1). PNBP is Non-Tax State Revenue, revenue obtained by central government

agencies for services rendered or in the form of levies imposed by government agencies, which excludes tax and retribution, and entered into state treasury.

2). PNDN is Domestic State Revenue, all revenues obtained by the state which include revenue from tax, i.e. domestic tax revenue, revenue from international trade tax, and revenue from non-tax which consists of revenue from natural resources, profi t share of State-Owned Company (BUMN), other PNBPs and income from Public Service Authority (BLU) owned by government which are entered into state treasury as income component in State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN).

3). Other PNBP is non-tax state revenue (PNBP) other than those that come from natural resources, profi t share of State-Owned Company and revenue from State-Owned Public Service Authority.

4). PNBP of resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector is PNBP generated from the provision of services in utilization of resources and equipment of postal and information technology sector managed by Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology which is entered into state treasury.

214


5). PDB is Gross Domestic Product (GDP), total output generated by the economy of a country through the economic sectors of that country.

10.3. Role of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and and Information Technology in State Revenue

Through its role in managing the activities and policies in the fi eld of utilization of resources and equipment of post and information technology, Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology gains revenue from services provided in managing telecommunication resources and other services. Such revenue is entered as non-tax state revenue (PNBP) which will be deposited to state treasury every day. PNBP received by Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology came from several sectors: (i) PNBP from BHP frequency, (ii) PNBP from the issuance of standard certifi cate of telecommunication equipment and testing of telecommunication equipment, (iii) PNBP from the implementation of radio operator certifi cation, i.e. REOR and SKOR, (iv) PNBP from IAR and IKRAP, and (v) PNBP from other sources including rent of service house.

Contribution of Directorate General of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology (SDPPI) in state revenue is analyzed from PNBP amount which is generated from services in the fi eld of utilization and testing of resources and equipment of post and information technology provided by working units within the Directorate General of SDPPI and its contribution to state revenue registered in APBN. The explanation of this PNBP data consists of two parts. The fi rst part is the development of PNBP revenues from each source at the Directorate General of SDPPI, the growth and the achievement of those revenues are compared with the target set. In the second part, analysis will be done on the contribution of total PNBP revenues against three types of state revenues, i.e. total domestic state revenue (PNDN), total non-tax state revenue (PNBP), and total other non-tax state revenue (other PNBP).

10.3.1. PNBP of Frequency SectorPNBP of frequency sector becomes the biggest source of revenuefor non-tax state revenue from both Directorate of SDPPI and Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. Such big amount of PNBP of frequency sectorcame from the License Fee (Biaya Hak Penggunaan/BHP) of Frequency. When still part of the structure of the Directorate General of Post and Telecommunication, this PNBP of BHP frequency also became the main source of revenue for PNBP

215


in the fi eld of communication and information technology.

Same as previous years, PNBP revenue from BHP Frequency in 2012 may exceed the target set although the achievement only 101.7% of the targeted revenue. This achievement is relatively normal considering PNBP of BHP Frequency in semester 1 already achieved 52.1% of PNBP target from BHP Frequency in 2012. Even though exceeding the target set, this PNBP revenue from BHP Frequency only slightly increased compared to the previous year and also only slightly exceeded the target set.

Revenue from BHP Frequency in 2012 in the amount of Rp 9.085 trillion only slightly increased by 3.3% compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, the ability to exceed the target set for revenue from BHP Frequency quite becomes an achievement considering that at the same time PNBP target from this BHP Frequency is increased by 5.6%. The increase of revenue realization of 3.3% is much better than the achievement in 2011 where PNBP realization from BHP Frequency actually decreased by 17.8%.

Table 1 illustrates that revenue realization of PNBLP from BHP Frequency showing an increase trend from year to year. Revenue realization of PNBP from BHP Frequency also has always exceeded the target set every year. During the period of 2008 – 2010, this revenue realization of PNBP from BHP Frequency has a high growth of revenue. Hence, although revenue target of PNBP from BHP Frequency was increased pretty high in that period, the revenue realization could still achieve the target. When target of PNBP from BHP Frequency is increased by 5.6%, the revenue realization still exceeded the target set. Like in the previous year, this realization of PNBP from BHP Frequency also just had a jump in semester 2.

Table 10.1. The Development of PNBP from BHP Frequency in 2006 - 2012

No Year Target (Thousands Rp.)

Realization (Thousands Rp.)

Target Growth (%)

Realization Growth (%)

Level of Target

Achievement

1 2006 2,516,907,000 2,675,569,428.2 120.1% 102.3% 106.3%

2 2007 2,409,289,000 3,368,167,814.7 -4.3% 25.9% 139.8%

3 2008 4,612,975,824 6,016,990,913.7 91.5% 78.6% 130.4%

4 2009 5,269,827,618 8,109,402,315.9 14.2% 34.8% 153.9%

5 2010 8,202,947,427 10,693,583,819.4 55.7% 31.9% 130.4%

6 2011 8,461,222,688 8,790,907,340.2 3.1% -17.8% 103.9%

7 2012 8,933,544,384 9,085,108,514.3 5.6% 3.3% 101.7%

216


10.3.2. PNBP of Standardization SectorPNBP revenue from the fi eld of equipment testing service and standard certifi cate issuance which in semester 1 of 2012 only reached 52.1%, at the end of 2012 has exceeded the target set. PNBP from Standardization Sector in this year of 2012 achieved Rp. 69.6 billion or achieved 132.6% of the target set. The achievement of PNBP revenue in 2012 also means that it has an increase even though it is only 6.7% compared to the previous year. The increase of this revenue is indeed lower than the growth of PNBP realization from standardization in the previous year. Even though revenue target in 2012 in increased by 5% compared to the previous year, realization of PNBP revenue is still able to exceed the revenue target set.

The chart presented in Figure 10.2 shows that PNBP revenue from this standardization sector has been consistently exceeding the target set. However, if viewed from its development, the achievement target in 2012 is only slightly increased from the target of last year, even though only slightly higher than the increased target in 2011. Previously, for three years in a row achievement target always increased pretty high. In 2010, for instance, the achievement target was increased up to 92% even though in the end the revenue realization could still

No Year Target

(Thousands Rp.)

Realization (Thousands

Rp.)

Target Growth (%)


Level of Target

Achievement

1 2007 10,500,000 17,609,534.0 133.3% 70.7% 167.7%

2 2008 17,000,000 29,862,510.0 61.9% 69.6% 175.7%

3 2009 25,000,000 47,233,912.0 47.1% 58.2% 188.9%

4 2010 48,000,000 53,883,832.0 92.0% 14.1% 112.3%

5 2011 50,000,500 65,276,436.0 4.2% 21.1% 130.6%

6 2012 52,500,000 69,626,768.8 5.0% 6.7% 132.6%

Table 10.2. The Development of PNBP of Standardization Sector

Year 2007 - 2012

Figure 10.1. Comparison between

PNBP Target and Realization from BHP

Frequency

217


exceeded that target. In 2012, the revenue target is only increased by 5% and revenue realization of PNBP from Standardization could achieve32.6% higher than the target set.

10.3.3. PNBP from Radio Operator Certifi cationThe source of PNBP revenue in the fi eld of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology comes from radio operator certifi cation. There are two sources of PNBP from radio operator certifi cation, i.e. revenue from REOR and SKOR, and revenue from License for Radio Amateur (IAR) and IKRAP.

10.3.3.1. PNBP from REOR and SKORPNBP revenue from REOR and SKOR until the end of 2012 still has not met the revenue target after up to semester 1 its revenue only achieved Rp. 104.7 billion or only reached 91.1% of the target set. The revenue realization and achievement in this year of 2012 is still better than in the previous years which only achieved 27.6% of the target. This achievement in 2012 also shows the rebounding of PNBP from REOR and SKOR after having a decrease of revenue since 2010 with achievement which was much lower than the target set. The achievement of revenue realization, which is better than in the previous year, is also because PNBP target from REOR and SKOR is reduced quite signifi cantly in 2012. PNBP target from REOR and SKOR is reduced by 55.4%, while its revenue realization in increased by 46.7% compared to the previous year. The increase of this revenue realization implicitly shows the increase of the number of tests on the candidates of radio operator by working unit at the Directorate General of SDPPI.

Figure 10.2. Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization of Standardization Sector

218


The trend of PNBP revenue from REOR and SKOR as presented in Figure 10.3 shows a rebound in this year of 2012 after having quite sharp decline since 2010. The increase of PNBP target from REOR and SKOR in 2010 apparently could not be followed by its revenue realization which was much lower than the target, even lower than the realization in 2009. This low PNBP realization recurred in 2011, hence the level of achievement of PNBP realization for REOE and SKOR was also low because its revenue target only slightly reduced. Entering 2012, the revenue realization increased again with the increase that achieved 46.7%. Although this increase has not made PNBP realization from PREOR and SKOR exceed the target set, it is a positive sign for the rebound of PNBP from REOR and SKOR in the future.

10.3.3.2. PNBP from IAR and IKRAPOne more source of PNBP revenue related to frequency usage is PNBP coming from the issuance of License for Radio Amateur (IAR) and License for Inter-Inhabitant Radio Communication (IKRAP). PNBP revenue from IKRAP in 2012 reached Rp 1.31 billion or 146% of the target set. This achievement shows the increase of PNBP revenue from IKRAP which is getting bigger in semester 2 after in semester 1 of 2012 only achieved 60.1% of the target set. PNBP

No Year Target

(Thousands Rp.)


Rp.)

Target Growth

(%)


Level of Target

Achievement

1 2007 46,000 48,250.0 31.4% 60.6% 104.9%

2 2008 50,000 143,467.0 8.7% 197.3% 286.9%

3 2009 145,000 182,875.0 190.0% 27.5% 126.1%

4 2010 265,725 75,600.0 83.3% -58.7% 28.5%

5 2011 258,125 71,360.0 -2.9% -5.6% 27.6%

6 2012 115,000 104,710.0 -55.4% 46.7% 91.1%

Table 10.3. PNBP from REOR and SKOR (Frequency) in

2007 - 2012

Figure 10.3 Comparison between

PNBP Target and Realization from REOR

and SKOR

219


revenue achievement from IKRAP in 2012 also means that there is an increase of 21.4% of revenue realization in the previous year. Even though the revenue target is increased by 60.7%, with good performance, PNBP revenue realization in 2012 is also increased so that it still exceeds the target set.

The development of PNBP revenue from IAR and IKRAP shows that revenue realization indicated an increasing trend. In 2012, the increase also follows the increase of PNBP realization in 2010 and 2011, even with the higher increase compared to that in 2011. In respond to the increase of revenue realization in 2010 and 2011, PNBP target from IAR and IKRAP is increased again as much as 60.7%. This increasing trend also followed by the increased revenue realization although not as high as the increase of revenue target. Yet, with this increasing trend its revenue realization achieved 146% of the target set.

The increase in PNBP revenue from IAR and IKRAP is in line with the increase in PNBP revenue from REOR and SKOR which had an increase after having a sharp decline in the previous 2 years. In other word, in this year of 2012 the submission of certifi cation applications for radio operator (REOR and SKOR) increased in line with the increase in the applications for radio amateur license (IAR and IKRAP).

No Year Target

(Thousands Rp.)


Rp.)

Target Growth

(%)


Level of Target Achievement

1 2007 16000 27,577.0 - - 172.4%

2 2008 20,000 6,227.0 25.0% -77.4% 31.1%

3 2009 20,000 55,909.0 0.0% 797.8% 279.5%

4 2010 69,150 913,981.7 245.8% 1534.8% 1321.7%

5 2011 560,000 1,082,897.5 709.8% 18.5% 193.4%

6 2012* 900,000 540,702.5 60.7% -50.1% 60.1%

Table 10.4. PNBP from IAR and IKRAP in 2007 –2012

Figure 10.4. Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from IAR and IKRAP

220


10.3.4. PNBP from other sourcesOther sources of PNBP revenue are other revenues coming from various sources other than the main source of PNBP of Directorate General of SDPPI such as rent of service house, fi ne, the remainder of the expenditure of the budget of last fi scal year and so on. Target of this miscellaneous PNBP began to be increased in 2011 after for three years was not increased. In 2012, target of miscellaneous PNBP revenue is increased again but only 0.02%. Realization of miscellaneous PNBP in this 2012 shows quite high increase of 31.2%. With such increase in PNBP realization, the level of achievement of this miscellaneous PNBP realization achieved 3653.8% of the target set or far above such target.

In semester 2, realization of miscellaneous PNBP actually was not too big, only Rp. 1.018 billion. Quite big realization of miscellaneous PNBP was in fact received in semester 1. In semester 1, the achievement of miscellaneous PNBP realization also surpassed the target set, i.e. 2672.3%, because the target set for this miscellaneous PNBP is very low, i.e. only Rp 103.7 million. Revenue from miscellaneous PNBP which is hard to predict may be the reason why the target set is very low.

The growth of miscellaneous PNBP realization in 2012 is actually much lower than the realization growth in 2011 which achieved 965.7%. This is due to realization of miscellaneous PNBP in 2010 which was still very low even though it surpassed the target set. High achievement of PNBP realization in 2011 which increased by 965.7% compared to that of the previous year and level of achievement of 2785% of the target did not push the increase in the revenue target of this miscellaneous PNBP. As the consequence, when this miscellaneous PNBP realization rebounds in 2012 although only 31.2%, it is far more than the target set.

No Year Target

(Thousands Rp.)


Rp.)

Target Growth (%)


Level of Target

Achievement

1 2007 80,000 88,435.0 - - 110.5%

2 2008 80,000 116,979.0 0.0% 32.3% 146.2%

3 2009 80,000 115,570.0 0.0% -1.2% 144.5%

4 2010 90,000 271,147.0 12.5% 134.6% 301.3%

5 2011 103,573 2,889,665.0 15.3% 965.7% 2785.1%

6 2012 103,774 3,791,750.0 0.02% 31.2% 3653.8%

Table 10.5. PNBP from Other

Sources in 2007 –2012

221


10.3.5. Composition of PNBP of Resources and Equipment of Post and Information Technology Sector

Overall, PNBP revenue at the Directorate General of SDPPI shows an increasing trend and exceeds the target set except for the revenue from REOR and SKOR. In total, this PNBP revenue at the Directorate General of SDPPI also has an increase compared to the previous year after in 2011 experiencing a decline. This increase is due to the increase of revenue realization from BHP Frequency with quite big nominal. Revenue from this PNBP is the major contributor of PNBP revenue at the Directorate General of SDPPI. The increase in the PNBP from BHP Frequency resulted in the increase of total PNBP of 3.4%. Meanwhile, in 2011, the total revenue of this PNBP decreased by 17.6% after three consecutive years increased by an average of 42.8% per year.

The increase in PNPB realization of 2012 is pushed by the increase in PNBP realization from BHP Frequency which increased by 3.3%. Even though other PNBP resources such as PNBP from other sources, PNBP from standardization, PNBP from REOR and SKOR, and PNBP from IAR and IKRAP have higher increase, but because the biggest contributor is from BHP Frequency, the total increase of PNBP is also pushed by the increase in PNBP realization from BHP Frequency.

The increase of PNBP revenue from BHP Frequency in 2012 in the amount of nearly Rp. 0.2 Trillion does not make many shifts in the composition of PNBP revenue from various sources. PNBP from BHP Frequency still becomes

Figure 10.5. Comparison between PNBP Target and Realization from Other sources

No Year Standardi-zation BHP Frequency PREOR

andSKOR IAR and IKRAP

Other Sources Total PNBP

1 2007 17,609,534 3,368,167,815 48,250 27,577 88,435 3,385,941,611

2 2008 29,862,510 6,016,990,914 143,467 6,227 116,979 6,047,120,097

3 2009 47,233,912 8,109,402,316 182,875 55,909 115,570 8,156,990,582

4 2010 53,883,832 10,693,583,819 75,600 913,982 271,147 10,748,728,380

5 2011 65,276,436 8,790,907,340 71,360 1,082,896 2,889,665 8,860,227,699

6 2012 27,359,541 9,085,108,514 104,710 1,314,140 3,791,750 9,159,945,883

Table 10.6. PNBP Realization of SDPPI Sector in 2007 –2012 (Rp. 000)

222


the main contributor to PNBP from Resources and Equipment of Postal and Information Technology sector with the proportion of 99.18% in 2012 or only slightly reduced than in 2011 which achieved 99.22%. In the meantime, contributions from three PNBP sources which experience an increase are PNBP coming from standardization, IAR and IKRAP, and miscellaneous PNBP. The proportion of PNBP from standardization increased from 0.74% to 0.76%, while proportion of PNBP from IAR and IKRAP increased from 0.012% to 0.014%, and miscellaneous PNBP increased from 0.003% to 0.033%. This increased proportion is due to the increase of PNBP from those three sources and at the same time a sharp decline in PNBP from frequency.

The rebound of PNBP revenue of Resources and Equipment of Post and information Technology (SDPPI) sector in 2012 after having a decline in 2011 is not followed by the increase of contribution in this SDPPI sector to state revenue. This is because the increase of PNBP from resources and equipment sector is far below the increase of state revenue, including total non-tax state revenue. In the formation of PNBP of resources and equipment of post and information technology, the amount of PNBP value produced is much smaller than when it was still in the formation of post and telecommunication sector. This is because PNBP revenue from postal and telecommunication sector and PNBP from Universal Service Obligation (USO) of Telecommunication were no longer taken into account. Contribution is measured from the proportion of PNBP of SDPPI sector to Domestic State Revenue (PNDN) including taxes, proportion to total Non-Tax State Revenue (including from oil and gas, and profi t of State Owned Companies/BUMN) and proportion to other PNBP.

Figure 10.6. Proportion of PNBP

realization between Sectors in PNBP of SDPPI

223


Contribution of PNBP of SDPPI sector to Domestic State Revenue (PNDN) experienced a decrease compared to the previous year from 0.74% to 0.68%. Meanwhile, contribution of PNBP of SDPPI sector to total PNBP also decreased from 2.73% to 2.68% although still good enough. Contribution of PNBP of SDPPI sector to miscellaneous PNBP in state revenue is also still good enough (above 10%) even though it has pretty sharp decline from 12.92% in 2011 to 12.58% in 2012. The decrease of PNBP contribution in 2012 besides due to the exclusion of PNBP revenue from postal sector, telecommunication sector and PNBP from universal service obligation (USO) of telecommunication from the structure of PNBP revenue of resources and equipment of post and information technology sector, is also because the increase of PNBP of SDPPI sector which is not as big as the increase of total state revenue. If compared with the condition in 2010, this is also due to PNBP revenue from BHP Frequency in 2012 which is still lower than in 2010.

10.4. Role of Postal and Telecommunication Industry in National Revenue

The role of resources and equipment of post and information technology sector to macro economy is done with output approach. Contribution of resources and equipment of post and information technology to the economy

Figure10.7 Contribution of PNBP of SDPPI Sector to state revenue

Even though PNBP value of SDPPI sector has an increase in 2012, contribution of this PNBP to state revenue in fact has a decrease. This is because the increase of PNBP of SDPPI sector is still lower than the increase of state revenue.

224


with output approach is shown by the role of communication sector in creating national gross domestic income (GDP) according to line of business. The growth of Indonesian gross domestic income from 2007 to 2012 based on line of business including communication sector is shown in table 10.7. GDP of communication subsector is included in the line of business of transportation and communication.

Communication subsector had been showing an increasing output and contribution which was getting better since 2007 and continued until 2012. In 2012, output from communication subsector reached Rp. 261.7 trillion, an increase of 10.6% compared to that of the previous year. This increase was still lower than the increase in 2011, but it still showed the positive trend of above 10%. Output from this communication subsector consisted of output from post and telecommunication in the amount of Rp. 234.6 trillion and output from communication support services sector which reached Rp 27.2 trillion. Post and telecommunication sector and communication support services sector underwent an increase of 10.56% compared to those of the previous year. The increase of this output of communication subsector in 2012 was still lower compared to the increase of output of transportation subsector which increased by 12.9%.

In the meantime, the total output for transportation and communication sector wherein post and telecommunication are included, reached Rp. 549.1 trillion in 2012 or an increase of 11.7% compared to that of the previous year. This shows that output increase of communication subsector started to decline or became lower than the output increase of its sector and continued the decline trend occurred in 2011. In fact, in 2010, the increase of this communication subsector was higher than its main sector and transportation subsector. The decline in the output increase of communication sector in 2011 and 2012, after experiencing an impressive increase until 2010, showed the beginning of investment and output saturation in communication subsector. The booming of communication subsector which took place since the end of 1990’s and continued at the beginning and mid of 2000’s, started to experience saturation when entering the second decade of this 21stcentury, particularly those coming from cellular telecommunication. However, it is estimated that this decline would not last long due to the shift of investment in telecommunication sector towards broadband and the growth of other telecommunication equipment such as tablet and smartphone, which is getting faster and more aff ordable by the public. Nevertheless, the growing number of the usage of telecommunication equipment by population with high teledensity will have an impact to the

225


beginning of the slowing growth of this sector compared to booming period of ownership and growth of the usage of telecommunication equipment.

Source: Central Statistics Body (BPS)*) Tentative fi gures**) Very tentative fi gures

Among main economic sectors, transportation and communication sector still has not shown a very big role. Contribution is still dominated by main sectors in Indonesian economy such as manufacturing industry sector, agricultural sector, and trading, hotel and restaurant sector. These sectors still give contribution of more than 20% to Indonesia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Moreover, contribution from Manufacturing Industry sector achieved more than 20% although showing a trend of decline. However, transportation and communication sector shows the trend of increasing and stable contribution, although the increase is relatively low, while the main sectors of economy precisely show a trend of decline in contribution. The increase of contribution in transportation and communication sector is part of economic transformation which starts to shift from primary sector to secondary sector and further to tertiary sector (services, including transportation and communication).

LINE OF BUSINESS 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012**

1. Agriculture 713,291.40 857,241.4 985,448.80 1,091,447.30 1,190,412.40 2. Mining and Excavating 543,363.80 591,912.7 718,136.80 879,505.40 970,599.60 3. Manufacturing Industry 1,380,731.50 1,477,674.3 1,595,779.40 1,806,140.50 1,972,846.60 4. Electricity, Gas & Water 40,846.70 47,165.9 49,119.00 56,788.90 65,124.90 5. Construction 419,321.60 555,201.4 660,890.50 754,483.50 860,964.80 6. Trading, Hotel & Restaurant 692.118,80 744.122,2 882.487,20 1,024,009.10 1,145,600.90 7. Transportation and Communication 312.454,10 352.423,4 423.165,30 491,283.10 549,115.50

a. Transportation 171.203,00 181.896,0 217.311,20 254,520.30 287,356.20 b. Communication 141.251,10 170.527,4 205.854,10 236,762.80 261,759.30 1. Post and Telecommunication 126.532,70 152.949,4 184.487,78 212,188.35 234,590.38

2. Communication Support Services 14.718,40 17.577,98 21.366,32 24,574.44 27,168.91

8. Finance, Leasing & Company Services 368.129,70 404.013,4 466.563,80 535,152.90 598,523.20

9. Services 483.771,30 574.116,5 654.680,00 783,970.50 888,676.40 GDP 4.954.028,90 5.603.871,2 6.436.270,80 7,422,781.20 8,241,864.30 GDP Without Oil & Gas 4.426.384,70 5.138.955,2 5.936.237,80 6,797,879.20 7,604,759.10

Table 10.7. GDP Based on Prevailing Price in 2008 – 2012 (Billion Rp.)

226


The trend of increased contribution to the economy also occurs in the subsectors, i.e. communication subsector, and post and telecommunication area. Table 10.8 shows that although its contribution to economy is still low, communication subsector indicates a continuously increasing contribution from 2.85% in 2008 to 3.18% in 2012. This increaseprecisely occurs when transportation subsector experiences a decline in contribution. The increase of contribution of communication subsector makes contribution oftransportation and communication sector remain stable and increasing. However, since 2010 contribution of this communication sector in fact had experienced a decline although slowly. On the other hand, transportation sector in the same period showed an increase. The trend of increased contribution also occurs in post and telecommunication sector and telecommunication support services sector. Contribution of post and telecommunication sector increased from 2.55% in 2008 to 2.85% in 2012.

Figure 10.8. Contribution of Sectors

to GDP with Oil and Gas in 2007 – 2012

Since 2010 contribution of GDP of communication sector had experienced a decline although slowly. On the other hand, transportation sector in the same period showed an increase. This decline was in line with the beginning of the decreasing growth of communication sector.

227


Source :Central Statistics Body (BPS)*) Tentative fi gures

The role of telecommunication in the economy is also shown from the bigger share of communication subsector in transportation and telecommunication sector in the structure of Indonesian economy. Under the growth condition of communication sector which starts to decline whereas the growth of transportation precisely increases, communication subsector shows a decreasing share in that sector although the decrease is relatively very low. The share of communication subsector which in 2010already reached 48.65%, in 2011 it decreased to be 47.67%. Meanwhile, in the same period, transportation subsector increased from 51.35% to 52.33%. Nevertheless, the share of communication subsector in this 2012 is still better than the condition in 2007 and 2008.

If viewed more deeply in communication subsector, fi gure 10.10 shows that the share of post and telecommunication was still very dominant in the structure of communication subsector. The share of post and telecommunication reached

LINE OF BUSINESS 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012**

1. Agriculture 14,40% 15,30% 15,31% 14.70% 14.44%

2. Mining and Excavating 10,97% 10,56% 11,16% 11.85% 11.78%

3. Manufacturing Industry 27,87% 26,37% 24,79% 24.33% 23.94%

4. Electricity, Gas & Water 0,82% 0,84% 0,76% 0.77% 0.79%

5. Construction 8,46% 9,91% 10,27% 10.16% 10.45%

6. Trading, Hotel & Restaurant 13,97% 13,28% 13,71% 13.80% 13.90%

7. Transportation and Communication 6,31% 6,29% 6,57% 6.62% 6.66%

- Transportation 3,46% 3,25% 3,38% 3.43% 3.49%

- Communication 2,85% 3,04% 3,20% 3.19% 3.18%

* Post and Telecommunication 2,55% 2,73% 2,87% 2.86% 2.85%

* Communication Support Services 0,30% 0,31% 0,33% 0.33% 0.33%

8. Finance, Leasing & Company Services 7,43% 7,21% 7,25% 7.21% 7.26%

9. Services 9,77% 10,24% 10,17% 10.56% 10.78%

Table 10.8. Role of Postal and Telecommunication Sector To GDP in 2008-2012

Figure 10.9. Proportion of communication subsector in transportation and communication sector

228


almost 90% and had been relatively stable from 2007 to 2012. The higher proportion of post and telecommunication is because this sector includes postal activities which are growing particularly towards logistics and courier services, and telecommunication activities which are increasingly experiencing rapid development for the more diverse usage. Technological development in telecommunication subsector also supports the magnitude of output in post and telecommunication area.

If viewed from the growth of its sector, transportation and communication sector shows the highest growth within national GDP structure compared to that of other sectors. Entering 2012 when there was a decline of growth in the structure of national GDP, transportation and communication sectors also showed decreasing growth despite being the sector with the highest growth. The growth of transportation and communication sector for the fi rst time was below two digits in 2012, i.e. 9.98% or declined from that in 2011 which still reached 10.7%. The growth which is still high in transportation and communication sector is supported by the growth in communication subsector which is still within two digits, i.e. 12.08%. This communication subsector also experienced a decline compared to that in 2011 which reached 12.64%.

If viewed from 2008, table 10.9 shows that the growth of transportation and communication sectors and particularly communication subsector experienced the sharpest decline. In 2008, transportation and communication sectors still grew as much as 16.06%, while its communication subsector even grew almost 30%, particularly those coming from communication support services sectors. The sharp decline in these past fi ve years is an impact of the beginning of slow investment and service products in communication sector. In the meantime, transportation subsector precisely showed an increased growth. The booming of telecommunication sector at the beginning and mid of 2000’s made the

Figure 10.10. Proportion of area in communication

subsector in GDP in 2007 – 2012

229


growth in communication subsector become very high during that period up to 2009. However, the tendency of usage of telecommunication service and equipment which was still high resulted in the growth of communication sector which was also pretty high.

Source: Processed from BPS data

If viewed more deeply at post and telecommunication in communication subsector, post and telecommunication still creates a high growth and is the highest among other economic sectors or subsectors although starting to experience a decline of growth. In 2012, post and telecommunication sector grew as much as 12.08% although decreased compared to that of the previous year which was able to grow 12.64%. In the coming years, if there is no signifi cant increase of investment in post and telecommunication sector or signifi cant growth of post and telecommunication sector in respond to the rapid growth of telecommunication and information technology sector, it is predicted that its growth would decline again even though it would still growth positively.

LINE OF BUSINESS 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012**

1. Agriculture 4,80% 3,98% 2,97% 3.38% 3.97% 2. Mining and Excavating 0,66% 4,44% 3,59% 1.68% 1.49% 3. Manufacturing Industry 3,66% 2,16% 4,80% 6.14% 5.73% 4. Electricity, Gas and Water 10,86% 14,29% 5,33% 4.82% 6.40% 5. Construction 7,47% 7,07% 6,95% 6.65% 7.50% 6. Trading, Hotel & Restaurant 7,34% 1,30% 8,66% 9.17% 8.11% 7. Transportation and Communication 16,06% 15,50% 13,76% 10.70% 9.98% a. Transportation 2,76% 5,62% 7,98% 7.68% 6.57% b. Communication 29,86% 23,61% 17,81% 12.64% 12.08% 1. Post and Telecommunication 29,91% 23,61% 17,81% 12.63% 12.08% 2. Communication Support Services 29,42% 23,61% 17,81% 12.73% 12.08% 8. Finance, Leasing & Company Services 8,24% 5,05% 5,83% 6.84% 7.15% 9. Services 6,09% 6,42% 6,01% 6.78% 5.24%

Table 10.9. The Growth Rate of GDP Sectors in Indonesia in 2007 – 2012 (%)

The sharp decline of growth of communication subsector in the past fi ve years was the impact of the slowing down of the growth of investment and service product in communication sector. The decline became that obvious because of the very high growth of this subsector in mid of 2000’s.

230


The growth trend of transportation and communication sector, communication subsector, and in the fi eld of post and telecommunication compared to GDP growth shows that telecommunication subsector grows much higher than the growth of GDP and transportation subsector. The slowing down of growth or stagnation of economic growth in all sectors still makes this communication subsector remain to grow high considering that the growth of this subsector has been very high since the beginning.The two elements in this subsector, i.e. post and telecommunication and telecommunication support services, also show high growth. The growth of communication subsector increased in 2007 and 2008, but started to decrease entering 2009. The growth decline of telecommunication subsector and post and telecommunication area is estimated to approach a point of saturation of telecommunication market and industry which was motivated by cellular telecommunication causing the decline of its growth. The slowing down of growth in cellular telecommunication usage is in line with the over-crowded teledensity of this cellular communication causing a decline in the growth of communication subsector.

However, with the broadband that is growing wider and becoming the new mainstay of telecommunication subsector, it is predicted that it could push back the growth of this telecommunication subsector. The role of cellular telecommunication would begin to be shifted by broadband as the main driving force of telecommunication subsector in Indonesia.

Figure 10.11 Growth trend of

telecommunication sector in GDP

in 2007 – 2012

data statistik semester 2 eng.indd

Documents