data viewer improvement

17
Fusion Utilization Fusion Utilization Improvement Improvement Gap improvement in Standby Time Analsys from ACS. Fusion in FTF by C. S.Tu

Upload: stone-striker

Post on 29-Nov-2014

215 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data viewer improvement

Fusion Utilization ImprovementFusion Utilization Improvement

Gap improvement in Standby Time Analsys from ACS.

Fusion in FTF by C.S.Tu

Page 2: Data viewer improvement

All down mode AnalysisAll down mode Analysis

All downmode analsys in Aug,2002 .

7 Type當13%

6 系統當11%

3 Standby7%

4 Calibration9%

5 Engineering工11%

10 Other8%

8 Handler Down5%

13 Unstable14%

11 Change Type5%

18 ACS Down0%

14 Handler Unstable1%

2 No record of downUnknown down

16%

Compared with all down rates ,unknown down is the top one .

Page 3: Data viewer improvement

Compared with standby time Compared with standby time

Standby Time Status in Aug, 2002

Small down27%

Idle7%

Others10%

Handler/Prober Cal./PM

0%

Unknowndown34% Handler/

Prober down6%

Type down16%

1.Unknow down occupy 34% of standby time.

2.Small down occupy 27% of standby time.

.

Page 4: Data viewer improvement

Small down HappenSmall down Happen

1.It happen when production stop over 2 minutes.

2.Each problem happened will casue small

stop first, why ?

Small stopACS

Unknownstop

System down

Handler down

?Type down

orWhen do you found problem ?

t

Page 5: Data viewer improvement

Small down v.s OthersSmall down v.s OthersThe relativity of top six down modes .

Small down 27%

Unknow down 34% System Down

TypeDown 16%Handler

downOther &Idle 7%

Page 6: Data viewer improvement

Type Down AnalysisType Down Analysis OneC 4058XH have more problem with Fusion.

VP223445%

VP405542%

VP4058135%

VP405846%

OM635X15%

PCD80XXH13%

PCF506011%

PCF508729%

PCF8775014%

Page 7: Data viewer improvement

System Down System Down

Hardware fail :

PECHF,FARMNT,DPS,PSCM…

Hang problem.

Hardware hang, bad die hang &

software hang …

Page 8: Data viewer improvement

System Down AnalysisSystem Down Analysis

System Down in Aug, 2002

summary out22%

PowerCut2%

Teste down11%

Vaccum Source1%

Tester Hang64%

75% Casued by printer without paper ,and wait for processing (hang).

Compared with system down.

Page 9: Data viewer improvement

Handler Down Handler Down TESEC handlers loader have more problem 38% in Aug.

Handler down in Aug,2002

Pin bend problem6%

Socket problem0%

Peripheral problemofhandler

4%Index abnormal

20%

Handler temperatureproblem

7%

Handler test areaproblem

6%

Unloader problem19%

Loader problem38%

Page 10: Data viewer improvement

Unknown Down Unknown Down

Unknow down occupy 34% of standby time in ACS.

Why we don’t know it down ?

No one found it .

No down happened .

or Other …

Page 11: Data viewer improvement

Cause Analysis & Team membersCause Analysis & Team members

UnknowStop from handler

Unknow Stop from Type

Unknow Stop from System

Small Stop

OneC have more 40%Of type down 13%:40581H occupy 35%

(40575 WT)40584 6%

Om635X 15%

Handler down 5%And Unstable 1%

Loader problem occupy38% of all handler

problem

System down have 11% of all down mode:Hang have 64 % of

system down.

C.S TuPeace LinJ.R Wang

Page 12: Data viewer improvement

Hang problem Hang problem Production hang . Double dataviewers casue test time longer.

(Need support from System,C.S.Tu and Vendor)

MS_Dlog could not worte (OneC DC log). (Need support from CSTD, Peace.Lin & BL)

Fail die casue hang (OneC). (Need support from CSTD. Peace.Lin & BL)

Hardware hang . Load board casued it hung when failed TXD1. (Need support from CSTD. Peace.Lin )

Hardware configuration miss. (Need support from System,C.S.Tu and Vendor)

Page 13: Data viewer improvement

Secondary dataviewers problemSecondary dataviewers problem Why Fusion processes have two dataviewers? 1. Normally only one work with optool , but when test program was unloaded , it still exited .Next launcher command be run , a new dataviewer will popup. 2. It casue test time longer than default for all types. For example : OneC > 1.5 times (normally dual sites 8.5sec ,become 12.8sec , but not always)

3. It influence output . 4. A bug of OS.

Page 14: Data viewer improvement

Two dataviewers delay test time Two dataviewers delay test time ==== :fusion12 dataviewer monitor : =============================prod 1529 1 50 19:52:07 ? 236:51 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:1480:head_1 -tester fusion12 -head 1prod 6240 6190 0 10:24:22 ? 0:01 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:6190:head_1 -tester fusion12 -head 1prod 6190 1 0 10:24:14 ? 0:03 optool -head 1 -load /tp/devices/vp40581h_R1084/V09/Prog/vp40581H_V09.eva \time Thu Jul 25 11:10:21 CST 2002==== :fusion09 dataviewer monitor : =============================preprod 18666 1 50 15:37:56 ? 314:31 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:preprod:18628:head_1 -tester fusion09 -head prod 22120 22072 0 05:49:49 ? 0:02 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:22072:head_1 -tester fusion09 -head 1prod 22072 1 0 05:49:40 ? 0:13 optool -head 1 -load /tp/devices/pcf50872_R1084/V1E/019/Prog/pcf50872-V1E_019.e Thu Jul 25 11:10:32 CST 2002==== :fusion13 dataviewer monitor : =============================envdiag 11442 11428 0 09:15:22 pts/3 0:07 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:envdiag:11428:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head prod 9532 1 42 16:10:57 ? 829:14 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:9482:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head 1prod 10499 1 32 18:52:10 ? 90:37 dataviewer -name DataViewerDefault:prod:10449:head_1 -tester fusion13 -head 1

This the one caused longer test time in Fusion .

This the one caused longer test time in Fusion .

Page 15: Data viewer improvement

How serious is it ?How serious is it ?

Users Happen Times

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

Week227 27 4 3 1 3 1 2 2

Week228 32 7 5 0 2 0 1 1

Week229 20 5 2 0 5 1 1 0

Week230 25 1 3 0 1 1 1 1

July,2002 total 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

Users Happen Times

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

Week227 27 4 3 1 3 1 2 2

Week228 32 7 5 0 2 0 1 1

Week229 20 5 2 0 5 1 1 0

Week230 25 1 3 0 1 1 1 1

July,2002 total 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

• FTF would have more problems than WTF, because it happened

when one exit optool after unload TP .

These with records!!!

Page 16: Data viewer improvement

The result after using pkill before PlThe result after using pkill before Pload oad

Short-term solution :

a .Kill the process before next optool popup automatically .

b. Two dataviewer prevention process was execute in Aug,2002 week 231.

Long-term solution :

Vendor’s SPR and improvement of OS are necessary.

Week\User Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm* Week231(Aug/1 ) 9 1 2 0 1 0 1

Week232 6 1 1 0 0 0 0Week233 4 0 2 0 0 0 1Week234 0 0 1 0 0 0 0Week235 0 1 1 0 0 0 0July total 19 3 7 0 1 0 2

Page 17: Data viewer improvement

Improvement result and TargetImprovement result and Target

Dataviewer casue long test time

1713

1

113 5 43 0 1 0 2 2

104

7

19

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

User account

SecondaryDataviewer

happenTimes

No Pkill 104 17 13 1 11 3 5 4

Pkill 19 3 7 0 1 0 2 2

Prod Envdiag Preprod Pre_vlsi Str Vlsi Pre_3gsm Others

• Finally target is no secondary dataviewer found .

• Compared to with pkill and without pkill.