daylighting: accident or technology? marc schiler schiler & associates / university of southern...
TRANSCRIPT
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates /
University of Southern California
Technical Approach to Natural Lighting Provide the light:
• Building plan, section and orientation• Fenestration location and sizing
Lighting circuits and controls• Balance the availability of natural light• Shutoff in stages
Sensors• Occupancy sensors• Photosensors
Aesthetic Approach to Natural Lighting Provide the space:
• Building plan, section and orientation• Fenestration location and sizing
Colors, reflective forms and gradation• Show the sensuous nature of the space• Reinforce the design concept and parti
Reinforce the function• Avoid glare• Provide visual terminus(humans are phototropic)
Five Topics: Topic One: Technical
– Concepts and Strategies
Topic Two: Aesthetic– Examples and Images
Topic Three: Models– Simulating Daylight with Physical Models
Topic Four: Calculations– Rules of Thumb and Calculations
Topic Five: Equipment– Sensors and Controls
Topic One
Technical: Concepts and Strategies
Agenda for Topic One
Benefits Strategies and Elements Definition of Terms Design Guidelines
Benefits
Quantitative– Cost savings for
user– Peak Reduction– Sustainability
Qualitative– Color Rendering– Productivity– Connection
Prototype Strategies
Foot Prints Clerestories Sawtooth Skylights Light Shelves Atria Exotica
Foot Prints
Clerestories
Sawtooth
Skylights
Caveat: – Lower winter angles = less light– Higher summer angles = more heat
Light Shelves
Light Pipes
Atria / Light Wells
Fresnel Lenses and Holographic Films
Design Guidelines Basic Principles
– illuminance vs. luminance
Glare– discomfort glare vs. veiling reflections
Vertical vs. Horizontal Tips
– Bring it in high– Bounce it or filter it– Control it – Harvest it
Vertical vs. Horizontal
Solar Control vs. Lighting per glazing area– more light from horizontal glazing, more heat
gain in summer, less heat gain in winter– less light from vertical, better distribution,
overhang controls for southern orientations, fins for eastern and western orientations (and northern)
Single Story
WarehousesSupermarkets Bldgs.Light IndustrialSuburban sites
Multiple Story
OfficesCity Bldgs.Urban sites
Summary (of Topic One)
Strategies and design elements
Design “Tips”
Break
Take a break– Stretch your legs– Get some coffee– Get rid of some coffee– Call home
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates /
University of Southern California
Topic Two: Aesthetics
Classics– Older buildings with natural
lighting often stand the test of time very well.
Current Examples– Newer buildings enjoy the
technique and the technical.
Good Examples, Old to New
St. Gallen Abbey Library, Peter Thumb Bradbury Building Ventura Coastal Building by Scott
Ellinwood Mt. Airy Library by Ed Mazria Boy’s / Ralph’s Supermarket Lyons School of Architecture by Jourda
and Peroudin
Examples for Varying Functions and Climates
Arab Center, Paris, Jean Nouvel Episcopal Church, Phoenix MIT Chapel, Boston, Aero Saarinen Wells Branch Bank, Minnesota BRF Office Building, Copenhagen
More Examples
Crystal Cathedral, Philip Johnson North Jutland Art Museum, Alvar Aalto Menil by Renzo Piano Kimbell Museum, Louis Kahn Ronchamps, Le Corbusier La Tourette, Le Corbusier
Note -
The preceding three pages refer to 35mm slide
collections of each building.
Summary of Part Two
The greatest designs include natural lighting.– Natural light saves energy– Natural light can project in dramatic fashion– Natural light can be bounced and diffused to fill a
space
This has proven true throughout history– Rather than fight the architecture, we wish to work
with the architecture in the designing the natural and “artificial” lighting to work together.
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates /
University of Southern California
Topic Three: Models
Using Scale Models to Study Light Distribution
Daylight Harvesting
Provide the light:– Building plan and orientation– Fenestration location and sizing
Test the design– Physical models– Computer simulations
Lighting circuits and controls– Balance the availability of natural light– Occupancy sensors, Photosensors
Agenda for Topic Three
Scales Examples Model Craft Measurement Photography Computations
Scale #1 - Quick and Dirty
Simple question: – skylight in middle or by the wall?– horizontal skylight or monitor?– eyeball assessment of question
Small Scale: – 1/16”=1’-0” to 1/2” = 1’-0” or about
1:200 to 1:20
Quick and Dirty (cont’d)
Construction – time: one hour or less– foamcore or chipboard, approximate
reflectances– tacky glue, masking tape or even pins – scissors, scrap materials at hand
Time and cost– 1/2 hour, $0 - $20
Scale #2 - Developmental
Developmental issues:– Sizing issues: “How big should the skylight
be?”– Placement/Light distribution: “How close to
the wall?”– Details: “How wide or deep should the light
well be?”– Actual measurements taken at different
times and seasons
Middle Scale: – 1” = 1’-0” or about 1:10
Developmental (cont’d)
Construction– Correct reflectances, some details like
baseboards – simple furniture, critical objects to be lit– more detail, such as mullions to show shadow
patterns– specular and diffuse surfaces are differentiated
Time and cost– 2 to 4 hours, $30 - $100
Scale #3 - Presentation
Qualitative issues:– Calibration against existing space to test
proposed renovations– Color interaction, mood, ambience,
personal reactions– Search for glare sources, veiling reflections– Photographs taken at different times and
seasons
Large Scale: – 2” = 1’-0” or about 1:5 or larger
Presentation (cont’d)
Construction– Correct colors, complete details like return
air grills, blackboards– Complete furniture, with simulated textures– Ceiling treatments, light fixtures, ducts– Dirty surfaces, where appropriate
Time and cost– 20 to 100+ hours, $100+
Review - Solar Angles
Altitude Azimuth
Solar Gnomons
One for each latitude, gnomon at correct height
Glued to model in relation to model compass
Manipulated to get shadow in the correct position– Azimuth first– Altitude second
Solar Gnomon Example 1
Model Craft
Joints must be sealed– electrical tape, or aluminum foil taped over all
corners and seams
Walls must be opaque– construction paper, opaque internal surface
treatments glued to internal surfaces– aluminum foil covering all exterior surfaces
(exception: any surface which might reflect light into the model, such as a roof adjacent to a roof monitor or sawtooth)
Model Craft (cont’d)
Replaceable parts or oversized parts– Whatever is being tested should fit into a light-
leak-proof slot– Prepare modules for each variation in
developmental or presentation models– In some cases, testing skylight placement can be
done by making an oversize roof, and then sliding it around so that the skylight sits over different areas. One roof and skylight can then simulate many positions without any cutting.
Model Craft (cont’d)
Portholes for measurement– allow access for meters and wires, if
necessary, and cover the hole if it is possible to read the meter from somewhere else.
– if necessary, cut holes in the floor to allow the meter surface to be at the workplane height in the scale of the model
Model Craft (cont’d)
Portholes for photography– plan the access for the camera from the
desired viewpoints– place portholes at in scale eye position,
e.g. 5’-3” in model scale– if multiple views are desired, cover
portholes with scale blackboards or paintings so that one porthole is not visible from the other camera angle
Review - Measurement
Footcandle or Lux Suggested Daylight Factors
(DF)– What the heck is a daylight
factor? Ein / Eext hor
Measurement Procedures
Grid Record Sheet– Draw a grid of expected measurement
points on a sheet of paper, along with headers recording actual time of day and simulated time of day
– Xerox enough copies of the sheet for different date or design variations
– Record each set of readings onto separate sheets
Measurement (cont’d)
Don’t let light in over your shoulder– shade the meters from direct beam for DF
values– Don’t let light in through the measurement
port (it screws up the measurement)– put a shroud over your head, and tape it
to the model, if necessary (black plastic trash bag, double thick, is usually sufficient)
Measurement (cont’d)
Do let light in over your shoulder!– when measuring through the active
window, be sure that your body stays below the field of view of the window and the meter
– don’t shade the meters from direct beam for absolute values
Photography
Record date and time– Include the date and time you
are simulating within the image itself
Photography (cont’d)
Provide a porthole Don’t let light in over your
shoulder– again, put a shroud over your head,
and tape it to the model, if necessary (a black plastic trash bag, double thick, is usually sufficient)
Slides
Note. At this point the presentation proceeds to proof that this can be done at each scale in the form of a series of 35mm slides of the interiors of real buildings followed by models of the same space, generally indistinguishable.
Summary of Topic Three
Scales, costs and functions Examples Model Craft Measurement Photography
Break
Take a break– Stretch your legs– Get some coffee– Get rid of some coffee– Call home
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates /
University of Southern California
Topic Four: Calculations
Rules of Thumb and Calculations
Agenda for Topic Four
Rule of Thumb Computations– Width to Depth– Percentage Glazing
IES calculation methods– sidelighting– toplighting
Design Guidelines (Reminder) Basic Principles
– illuminance vs luminance
Glare– discomfort glare vs veiling reflections
Vertical vs. Horizontal Tips
– Bring it in high– Bounce it or filter it– Control it – Harvest it
Reminder of Application Guidelines
Different functions and building forms will require different calculation methods.
Vertical vs. Horizontal
Solar Control vs. Lighting per glazing area– more light from horizontal glazing, more heat
gain in summer, less heat gain in winter– less light from vertical, better distribution,
overhang controls for southern orientations, fins for eastern and western orientations (and northern)
Single Story
WarehousesSupermarkets Bldgs.Light IndustrialSuburban sites
Multiple Story
OfficesCity Bldgs.Urban sites
Rules of Thumb for Aperture Sizing
Suggested Daylight Factors (DF)– What the heck is a daylight factor?
Sizing to obtain the suggested DF– What glazing area in which kind of
element
Computer Programs– If the client’s got money
Suggested Daylight Factors
Function DF Comment
Circulation 1% vertical surfaces are importantPublic Spaces >1% more light, more dramaWarehouse 1.5% higher for tightly packed shelvesOffice area 2-4% filing, reception, general area
Detailed office work 5% focus on work surfaceFactory work 2-4% dependent on function and dangerDetailed manf’g 5% tasks requiring high visual acuityManual drafting, color comparison 6% provide one area within the space
Sizing
From Sidelighting (d < 2.5 x h) Suggested Glazing Areanear the front of the space DF x Af / 0.5Tgat the middle of the space DF x Af / 0.2Tgnear the back of the space DF x Af / 0.1Tg
From Toplighting Suggested Glazing AreaVertical monitors DF x Af / 0.2TgNorth facing sawtooth DF x Af / 0.33TgHorizontal Skylights* DF x Af / 0.5Tg
Example #1
2,000 sf of warehouse, toplighting – forklift access, generous aisles– suggested DF = 1.5%– Transmissivity of glazing = 62%– Horizontal skylights
Go for uniform 1.5% – Ag = DF x Af / 0.5 Tg – = .015 x 2,000sf / (0.5 x .62)– = 96 sf
Example # 2
Go for 3% at middle
–Ag = DF x Af / 0.2 Tg
– = .03 x 2,000sf / (0.2 x .75)
– = 400 sf
Go for 3% at back
–Ag = DF x Af / 0.2 Tg
– = .03 x 2,000sf / (0.1 x .75)
– = 800 sf
2,000 sf of simple office space, sidelighting – non strenous tasks, filing, some computer terminals– suggested DF = 2-4%– depth within 2.5h of window (20 ft of 8 ft window)– Transmissivity of glazing = 75%
Do layout, decide desired daylit depth
IES Lumen Method
Tracks light from sky and sun separately
Applies form and reflectance factors to light from ground
Assumes a strip window for the entire length of one wall (as might be found in an office.)
IES Lumen Method (cont’d)
Calculates a Coefficient of Utilization (CU) for five locations within the cross section of the space
Basic Equation
Ei = Ex NT CU where
Ei = interior illuminance in lx, Ex = exterior illuminance in lx,
NT = net transmittance, CU = coefficient of utilization.
Sidelighting
Ei = Exv τ CU
where Ei = interior horizontal illuminance on a
reference point from sidelighting, in lx, Exv = exterior vertical illuminance on the window wall in lx, τ = net transmittance of the window wall, CU = coefficient of utilization.
Ground Exitance
Mg = ρg (Exh sky + Exh sun)
where
Mg = exitance from the ground in lm/m2, ρg = reflectance of the ground, Exh sky = horizontal illuminance from the sky in lx, Exh sun = horizontal illuminance from the sun in lx.
Illuminance from Overcast Sky Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete
tables
Illuminance from Clear Sky
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
Illuminance from Sun
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
Net Transmittance
τ = T Ra Tc LLF
τ = net transmittance of windowLLF = light loss factor representing dirt accumulation Ra = the net-to-gross window area ratio representing such elements as mullions and glazing bars; Tc = other elements such as shades and drapes
Light Loss Tables (used to be slide 87)
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
CU Sky Component = 0.75
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
CU Ground Component
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
Clear Window Illuminance
Ei = τ (Exv sky CUsky + Exv g CUg)
Ei = interior illuminance at a reference point in lx, τ = net transmittance of the window wall, Exv sky = exterior vertical illuminance from the sky on the window in lx, CUsky = coefficient of utilization from the sky, Exv g = exterior vertical illuminance from the ground on the window in lx, CUg = coefficient of utilization from the ground.
Diffusing Window Illuminance
Ei = 0.5 τ (Exv sky + Exv g ) ( CUsky + CUg)
Ei = interior illuminance at a reference point in lx, τ = net transmittance of the window wall, Exv sky = exterior vertical illuminance from the sky on the window in lx, CUsky = coefficient of utilization from the sky, Exv g = exterior vertical illuminance from the ground on the window in lx, CUg = coefficient of utilization from the ground.
Toplighting
Ei = Exh τ As / Aw
Ei = average incident illuminance on the workplane from skylights in lx, Exh = horizontal exterior illuminance on the skylights in lx, As = gross projected horizontal area of all the skylights in m2
Aw = area of the workplane in m2, τ = net transmittance of the skylights and light well, including losses because of solar control devices and maintenance factors, CU = coefficient of utilization.
Toplighting (cont’d)
TDM = 1.25 TFS (1.18 - 0.416 TFS)
TDM = dome transmittance, TFS = flatsheet transmittance.
Toplighting (cont’d)
T = (T1 T2) / (1 - ρ1 ρ2)
T1, T2 =diffuse transmittances of the individual domes, ρ1 = reflectance from the bottom side of the upper dome, ρ2 = reflectance from the top side of the lower dome.
Light Well Equation
WCR = 5h(w +l) / wl WCR is the well cavity ratio, used to
look up the well efficiency Nw
h is the well height, w is the well width,l is the well length. (The dimensions h, w, and l must be expressed in the same units.)
Light Well Cavity Ratio
Table from IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition
Diffuse Transmittance
τd = Td Nw Ra Tc LLF
Td is equal to the diffuse transmittance
Nw is the well efficiency
Ra = ratio of net to gross skylight area Tc = transmittances of diffusers, lenses, louvers, or other controls LLF = the light loss factor from IES tables.
Direct Transmittance
τD = TD NW Ra Tc LLF
TD is equal to the direct transmittance of the dome
Nw is the well efficiencyRa = ratio of net to gross skylight area Tc = transmittances of diffusers, lenses, louvers, or other controls LLF = the light loss factor from IES tables.
Room Cavity Ratio
RCR = 5 hc (l + W) / lw
hc is the height from the workplane to the bottom of the skylight well, l is the length of the room,w is the width of the room. (All three parameters must have the same units.)
Room Cavity CU Tables
Refer to IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition for complete tables
Wall Reflectance (%) Ceiling Reflectance
RCR 50 30 10
0 1.19 1.19 1.19
1 1.05 1.00 .97
2 .93 .86 .81
3 .83 .76 .70
4 .75 .67 .60
5 .67 .59 .53
6 .62 .53 .47
7 .57 .49 .43
8 .54 .47 .41
9 .53 .46 .41
80
10 .52 .45 .40
Overcast Sky
Ei = Exh sky τd CU N (A / Aw) Exh sky = exterior horizontal illuminance due to the
sky only, in lx, τd = net diffuse transmittance, τD = net direct transmittance,CU = coefficient of utilization, N = number of skylights, A = area of each skylight in m2, Aw = area of the workplane in m2.
Clear Sky
Ei = (Exh sky τd + Exh sun τD) CU N (A / Aw) Exh sky = exterior horizontal illuminance due to the sky
only, in lx, Exh sun = exterior horizontal illuminance due to the sun only, in lx, τd = net diffuse transmittance, τD = net direct transmittance,CU = coefficient of utilization, N = number of skylights, A = area of each skylight in m2, Aw = area of the workplane in m2.
Daylight Factor
CIE (European) methods Less accurate, more flexible, in
allowing asymmetrical window placement
PSALI Some methods only account for
overcast conditions
Computer Programs
More accurate predictions or renderings– Lightscape– Radiance– Lumen Micro (et al)– Superlite
Payback period, including effect of HVAC– DOE2.1E– MicroDOE, PowerDOE, CECDOE, etc.– HEED, Solar 5
Summary of Topic Four
Computational Rules of Thumb IES Lumen Method
– sidelighting– toplighting
Daylight Factor Computer programs
Break
Take a break– Stretch your legs– Get some coffee– Get rid of some coffee– Call home
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates /
University of Southern California
Part Five: Equipment
Natural Lighting:Control Devices and Systems
Daylight Harvesting
Provide the light:– Building plan and orientation– Fenestration location and sizing
Test the design– Computer simulations– Physical models
Lighting circuits and controls– Balance the availability of natural light– Occupancy sensors, Photosensors
Agenda for Topic Five
Controls California Codes Typical Circuits Demonstration Possible Savings Dangers and Pitfalls Walkthrough
Review - Terms
Design Level Circuits Devices
– sensors– power packs– switches
Basic Strategy Circuit layout and sensor
placement, daytime
Basic Strategy Circuit layout and sensor
placement, nighttime
California Code
Must provide possibility for 50% reduction in any room over 100 sq. ft.
Provide separate switching for daylit areas, to allow harvesting
Allowable Lighting Power Density and Actual Lighting Power Density– Credits for daylight sensors– Credits for occupancy sensors– Credits for automatic time controls, etc.
California Code (cont’d) Credit factors for occupancy sensors
Type of Control Type of Space Factor
Occupant Sensor any space 251 square feet enclosed 0.20with separate sensor for eachspace
by opaque floor to ceiling partitions; any size classroom, corridor,conference room or waiting room
rooms of any size that are used solely for storage 0.60
other spaces greater than 250 square feet 0.10
Occupant sensor with a separatesensor for each space used inconjunction with daylightingcontrols and separate sensor foreach space
any space 250 squarefeet within a daylight areaand enclosed by opaquefloor to ceiling partitions
0.10 (may be addedto daylighting controlcredit)
California Code Required Layouts
Control types
Occupancy Sensors Photosensors Continuous Dimming vs. Step
Dimming Occupancy and Photosensor
Interaction
Occupancy Sensors
Ultrasonic– sees around corners– quartz crystal oscillator– multiple receivers– sees inanimate movement, sometimes vibrations
Infrared– line of sight only– ignores movement of same temperature objects– can be aimed and masked
Comparison
Function or characteristics ultrasonic infraredpartitioned areas good badrestrooms with stalls good badlong enclosed hallways good OKvery large low ceilinged areas good OKsmall enclosed offices OK goodareas with high ceilings OK goodareas with high vibration or airflow bad goodopen areas which need to be subdivided bad good
Ultrasonic
Infrared
Photosensors
Ceiling mounted, viewing workplane
Continuous Dimming vs. Step Dimming
Low natural light + single step = no savings (single step is never activated, light too low)
Continuous Dimming vs. Step Dimming
Continuous dimming harvests immediately (begins @ 100%, reduces to 30%*)
Continuous Dimming vs. Step Dimming
Large natural light + single step = big savings (single step is activated, goes to zero)
Continuous Dimming vs. Step Dimming
Plentiful daylight + single step = best value Lower natural light levels require
continuous dimming
Typical circuits
Power Pack Separate low voltage signal RS-232, EPROM, Carrier Wave and
X-10
Power Pack Switches, sensors and outside sources
Staged Signals
Interim logic box collects signal data
“Intelligent Ballasts” Separate low voltage signal from sensor to ballasts
Possible savings
DOE2.1E– STEPPED vs.CONTINUOUS– LT-REF-PT-1 ( x, y, z)– LT-FRACTION-1– DESIGN LEVEL– Lighting ->HVAC -> plant -> Economics
HEED, DAYLIT– STEPPED vs. CONTINUOUS– 3 zones– DESIGN LEVEL
Dangers and Pitfalls
Users– Sensitivity and Time Delay– Incorrect Placement– “Know it All”
Contractors– Upside Down– Wrong Voltage– Passive Circuit to Active Circuit– No Calibration
Summary
Controls– Occupancy Sensors– Photosensors– Continuous Dimming vs. Step Dimming– Occupancy and Photosensor Interaction
Code Requirements and Benefits
Summary (cont’d)
Typical Wiring Diagrams– Power pack vs. “intelligent ballasts”
Typical Pitfalls Energy saved Quality Environment!
Overall Summary
Natural Light in Buildings– Provide the light:
• Building plan, orientation and section• Fenestration location and sizing
– Lighting circuits and controls• Balance the availability of natural light• Shutoff in stages
– Sensors• Occupancy sensors• Photosensors
Sources for further study Books:
– Ander, Gregg; Daylighting Performance and Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1995
– Kaufman, John, et al; IES Handbook; Illuminating Engineering Society (IESNA), New York
– Schiler: Simplified Design of Building Lighting, Wiley & Sons, New York 1992
– Schiler et al: Simulating Daylight with Architectural Models, DNNA report
Sources for further study (cont’d)
Monographs:– ____; RP-5 Recommended Practice of
Daylighting; Illuminating Engineering , Society (IESNA), New York
– ____; RP-21 Calculation of Daylight Availability; Illuminating Engineering Society (IESNA), New York
– ____; RP-23 Calculation of Daylight; Illuminating Engineering Society (IESNA), New York
Finis
Daylighting: Accident or Technology?
Marc SchilerSchiler & Associates / University of Southern California