DDI Lifecycle: Moving ForwardOutcome of the Recent Workshop in Dagstuhl

Joachim Wackerow

• Will be model-based– Easier to understand– Better interaction with other disciplines and

standards– Easier to develop and maintain in a consistent way– Will enable more efficient software development

Why Now?

• After the experience of developing and using the initial DDI-L structure– We find continued improvement of the

development line is limited by the lack of a data model

– Further, we are experiencing pressure for changes from several directions at once• new content from substantive working groups, which

requires new approaches to the design of the specification.

DDICore

DDIFoundational

Metadata

DDISimple DataDescription

DDISimple

Questionnaire

DDICodebook

DDIUtility

Non-DDI

Utility

DDIDocument

Non-DDIFunctions

Core

Functional

Utility

Foundational

Non-DDI

Modularized DDI Model

Deliverables

1. Completed model templates for the 4 identified functional areas – In progress

2. First draft of common model documentation based on the completed templates – In progress

3. Draft design and specification of production process – Done4. Draft design principles for DDI work products In progress5. Documentation of DDI Alliance workflows In progress6. Draft XML syntax binding specification In progress7. Draft RDF syntax binding specification Mostly done8. Draft business rules specification for model transformations

In progress9. Documentation of modeling style (includes UML profile)

In progress

Representations

• XML Schema / XML for exchange and preservation

• OWL/RDF for exposure to Semantic Web / Linked Data

• Frameworks– Java/C#, … for processing– DBMS for storage

• Data as a Service, Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), Web services, REST

Timeline

• Dagstuhl October 2012, 5 days• Dagstuhl October 2013, 5 days• EDDI – December 2013, 2 days• NADDI – April 2014, 5 days• IASSIST – June 2014, 5 days• Dagstuhl – October 2014, 5 days• Plus virtual meetings in between• Goal: First version of model March 31, 2015

DDI VersionsVersion Usage

Codebook 2.1/2.5 future versions only for maintenance

If Codebook features and available tools cover requirements.

Lifecycle 3.1/3.2 future versions only for maintenance

If requirements are met by Lifecycle 3.*, i.e. data lifecycle coverage is important.

RDF Discovery future versions only for maintenance

If existing Codebook or Lifecycle 3.* instances should be exposed to the Semantic Web.

Lifecycle 4.0 additional features added to this version

If new software development is started and stable specification packages are available.First packages expected in 2015.

Dagstuhl Workshop Participants2012 2013

More Information

http://www.ddialliance.org/ddi-moving-forward-process