december 9, 2005jurix conference brussels 1 using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of...

22
December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department of State and Administrative Law Faculty of Law, Leiden University

Upload: nickolas-fowler

Post on 04-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 1

Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents

Laurens Mommers, Wim VoermansDepartment of State and Administrative Law

Faculty of Law, Leiden University

Page 2: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 2

Access to legal information?

legal information

Page 3: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 3

A black box?

Different source types Large numbers of documents Complex version management for some

document types Specialized terminology Complex hierarchical relations between

documents Complex language use

Page 4: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 4

Lawyers vs. Laymen...

...and the need for a Universal Business Adapter...

Page 5: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 5

Lawyers vs. Laymen...

...a Babel Fish...

Page 6: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 6

Lawyers vs. Laymen...

...or magic reading glasses

Page 7: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 7

In the absence of which...

Realistic solutions should be found: Semantic means Smallest meaningful entities Meaningful relations

Page 8: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 8

Creating a legal WordNet

Define concepts lexical vs legal concepts occurrence in documents

Impose relations lexical vs legal relations relations between documents

Page 9: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 9

Legal definition techniques

No definition every-day meaning specialized language meaning no ambiguities

By context Definitions

Page 10: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 10

Definition types

General definitions (whole new meaning): generalisations: characteristics of a concept specifications: instances of a concept abbreviations: meaning of abbreviated concepts recursive definitions: reference to other concepts

Partial definitions (partial new meaning): extension or limitation of the meaning of a known

concept in or outside the definition article

Definition by reference

Page 11: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 11

Where do meanings come from?

Use the most obvious source of explicit legal meaning: authoritative legal documents

legislation, case law, customary law non-authoritative legal documents

literature legal interpretation methods (grammatical,

historical, teleological etc.)

Page 12: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 12

Linking legal and regular meaning

Comparison is possible if definitions are made explicit comparative terminology (Sara Castagnoli)

perfect equivalence partial equivalence non-equivalence

Page 13: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 13

Relation types

Content relations conceptual equivalence (partial or full) functional equivalence (partial or full)

Structural relations implemented in implemented as

Legal relation legal equivalence (partial or full)

Page 14: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 14

Legal concept (1)

Synset: {service provider} Gloss: any natural or legal person providing

an information society service Source: Directive 2000/31/EC Definition type: generalisation

Page 15: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 15

Legal concept (2)

Synset: {established service provider} Gloss: a service provider who effectively

pursues an economic activity using a fixed establishment for an indefinite period. [etc.]

Source: Directive 2000/31/EC Definition type: partial definition, includes

{service provider}

Page 16: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 16

Relations

Hyponymy/hyperonymy {established service provider} hyponym_of {service provider}

Implementation{elektronische handtekening (1)} implemented_as {elektronische handtekening (2)}

Equivalence{elektronische handtekening (1)} equivalent_to {elektronische handtekening (2)}

Page 17: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 17

Overview

< EC legal documents

national legal documents >

< EC legal concepts national legal concepts >

^relations: implementation (blue), equivalence (yellow)

Page 18: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 18

Supporting mono-lingual accessibility

linking different vocabularies by similarity finding links between lexical and legal

vocabularies purpose:

mapping laymen’s questions to legal documents

linking legal documents to legally relevant documents

information retrieval

Page 19: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 19

Supporting cross-lingual accessibility

linking different vocabularies by similarity finding equivalents and near equivalents

between legal vocabularies finding differences between concepts

purpose: comparative law research comparing implementations of EU legislation information retrieval

Page 20: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 20

Using meaning to support users

Showing meanings (hyperlinks etc.) Showing differences in meanings (marking

identical parts) Showing meanings to disambiguate queries

(input of ambiguous term, manual disambiguation by user)

Page 21: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 21

Real-world applications

Using legal and lexical definitions to explain terms in legal documents

Building networks of documents from different legal systems, enabling easier comparison

Comparative law research (practical and theoretical)

Page 22: December 9, 2005Jurix conference Brussels 1 Using legal definitions to increase the accessibility of legal documents Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans Department

December 9, 2005 Jurix conference Brussels 22

Please note...

legal information

...that this is a transparent box now