defection & desertion: influence of bigotry in 2016€¦ · defection & desertion:...
TRANSCRIPT
Defection & Desertion: Influence of Bigotry in 2016
Tracy Goodwin
Stony Brook University
Department of Political Science
• Elections are won by the side that mobilizes the most
partisans.
• Partisan identity and ideology drive vote choices
(Lewis-Beck et al., 2011).
• Partisan defection is declining (Smidt, 2017).
• The 2016 Presidential election was charged with racial
tensions, anti-immigrant sentiment, and bias against
women.
• Racial resentment influenced turnout and vote choice
for Obama (Krupnikov & Piston, 2015; Payne et al.,
2010).
• How did misogyny, anti-immigrant attitudes and
racial resentment influence 2016 turnout and vote
choice?
• The 2016 Presidential election was charged with
racism, misogyny and anti-immigrant sentiment.
• Prejudice is a powerful motivator for behavior.
• Partisan identity is a powerful motivator for voting.
• Conflict can arise in voters when prejudice and
partisanship influences operate in opposite directions.
• Prejudiced Democrats face a conflict between
voting for the in-party female candidate that
embraces immigrants and minorities versus voting
for the out-party candidate that is more consistent
with their attitudes.
• Non-prejudiced Republicans face a conflict
between voting for their party’s candidate who is
anti-immigrant, misogynistic, and accused of
racism versus the out-party candidate that is more
consistent with their attitudes.
• This could drive some partisans to either desert
their party and stay home on election day or defect
to the other party.
BACKGROUND
PURPOSE
Data
• American National Election Studies 2016
• Self-report vote choice and validated voter turnout.
• Misogyny (4-items), anti-immigrant attitudes (2-items), racial resentment (4-items)
• Vote coded as no vote, vote for Clinton, or vote for Trump
• Vote validation is used to determine if a respondent voted; then self-report vote choice is used
to determine which candidate the respondent voted for.
Analysis
• Multinomial logit predicting vote choice
• Separate models for Democrats and Republicans
• Controls: partisan identity strength, ideological self-placement, political interest, political
efficacy, contact by campaign or mobilization group, and demographics.
• Validated using American Life Panel data which produced the same results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This research indicates that in 2016 prejudice against women, immigrants, and African-Americans
had significant impacts on turnout and vote choice. Democrats with negative attitudes towards
women, blacks, and immigrants were more likely to vote for Trump. Interestingly, misogyny did not
influence Republican’s turnout and vote choice instead positive attitudes towards blacks and
immigrants increased the likelihood of them voting for Clinton. Democrats were demobilized by
anti-immigrant sentiment while positive attitudes towards blacks demobilized Republicans.
1. Krupnikov, Y., & Piston, S. (2015). Racial prejudice, partisanship, and White
turnout in elections with Black candidates. Political Behavior, 37(2), 397-418.
2. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Norpoth, H., Jacoby, W., & Weisberg, H. The American voter
revisited. University of Michigan Press, 2008.
3. Payne, B. K., Krosnick, J. A., Pasek, J., Lelkes, Y., Akhtar, O., & Tompson, T.
(2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential
election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 367-374.
4. Smidt, C. D. (2017). Polarization and the decline of the American floating
voter. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 365-381.
• Prejudice against women, immigrants, and African-
Americans increased the probability of Democrats
defecting to Trump (2%, 8%, and 11% respectively).
• Democrats with negative immigrant attitudes deserted
Clinton and chose not to vote (32% increase).
• Misogyny did not effect Republican vote choice or
turnout.
• Republicans with positive immigrant and African-
American attitudes had increased probabilities of
defecting to Clinton (4% and 8% respectively).
• Republicans with positive immigrant and African-
American attitudes deserted and chose not to vote
(11% and 21% respectively).
RESULTS
ReferencesConclusion