department of transportation highlights of the 2008-09 governor’s budget
DESCRIPTION
Department of Transportation Highlights of the 2008-09 Governor’s Budget. Presented to the California Transportation Commission February 13-14, 2008. 2008-09 Governor’s Budget State of Fiscal Emergency. Budget Reductions and Reform There is a projected $14B budget gap for 2008-09. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Tab 16 (4.7)
1Division of Budgets
Department of TransportationDepartment of TransportationHighlights of the Highlights of the
2008-09 Governor’s Budget2008-09 Governor’s Budget
Presented to thePresented to theCalifornia Transportation California Transportation
CommissionCommissionFebruary 13-14, 2008February 13-14, 2008
2
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetState of Fiscal Emergency
Budget Reductions and Reform There is a projected $14B budget gap for
2008-09. The Governor has declared a state fiscal
emergency Mandates reductions in General Fund funded
agencies Department excluded from proposed current year
cuts
3
2008-09 Governor’s Budget Overview
2008-09 Capital Outlay includes $2.65B in Proposition 1B funds
2008-09 Local Assistance includes $1.15B in Proposition 1B funds
CY BY Adjusted Proposed %
Category 2007-08 2008-09 ChangeState Operations $4,159 $4,244 2.0%Capital Outlay $6,817 $6,610 -3.0%Local Assistance $3,173 $3,033 -4.4%
Total $14,149 $13,887 -1.9%Department Positions 23,258 23,417 0.7%
Changes in Budget Category(millions)
4
2008-09 Governor’s Budget OverviewMajor Revenue Changes
($ millions)
2007-08 2008-09 2007-08 2008-09 2007-08PTA Sales tax - Diesel 357 381 344 366 -12 -16
Sales tax - Proposition 111 69 70 67 69 -2 -1
Sales tax - Spillover (gross)1 827 935 746 909 -81 -25
Spillover Diversions -622 -467 -622 -455 0 13PTA Total: $630 $918 $536 $889 -$94 -$30
SHA Fuel Excise Tax 2,212 2,252 2,173 2,212 -39 -40Weight fees 1,027 1,059 1,018 1,049 -9 -10
SHA Total: $3,239 $3,311 $3,191 $3,261 -$48 -$50
TIF Sales tax - Gasoline $1,481 $1,538 $1,439 $1,485 -$42 -$53
1. Includes revenue deposited in the Mass Transportation Fund and apportioned through theState Transit Assistance (STA) Program.
2008 Fund Estimate
2008-09 Governor's Budget
2008-09
Difference
5
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetSignificant Proposals
Proposition 42 Full funding in 2008-09 of $1.485B Proposition 1A loan repayment of $83M
Proposition 1B Bonds $3.80B for the Department of Transportation
in 2008-09 $1.53B for the Corridor Mobility Improvement
Account $1.12B for the Transportation Facilities Account $500M for the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund $200M for the State-Local Partnership Program
6
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetSignificant Proposals
Public Transportation Account (PTA). Sales tax forecasts for 2008-09 were revised
slightly downward between May and December Capital outlay and local assistance are over
$500M less than 2007-08 PTA receives loan of $60M loan from TCRF PTA reallocations include:
$141M to Regional Center Transportation $5M increase to University of California
Note: PTA resources reduced by statutory changes to distribution of spillover and to PTA share of Proposition 42 revenues
7
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetSignificant Proposals
Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) $83M Proposition 1A loan repayment $100M from Tribal Gaming to SHA Possible repayment schedule could result in
project delays and higher project costs May jeopardize federal and local project funding
8
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetSignificant Proposals
Local Funding $1.7B in additional funding for transit and
local streets and roads Proposed trailer bill to delay monthly HUTA
transfers for six monthsPerformance Based Infrastructure (PBI)
Allows public/private partnerships for infrastructure needs, including transportation
The Budget Stabilization Act Reforms the state budget process
9
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetOther Issues
The Strategic Growth Plan (SGP) Under-funded State Highway Operations and
Protection Program (SHOPP) The Administration will work with interested
parties and the Legislature to: Define scope of problem Develop solutions
10
2008-09 Governor’s BudgetOther Issues
Sacramento Superior Court ruled that $409M in PTA funds could not be diverted to help balance the state budget last year. The $409M is not appropriated in the
Department’s budget. The Legislature may or may not appropriate
this amount for transit capital purposes.