design of solid spallation targets at psi - cap.bnl.gov · design of solid spallation targets at...

18
Kürzel, Datum Design of Solid Spallation Targets at PSI G. Heidenreich Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland

Upload: vudan

Post on 09-Sep-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Kürzel, Datum

Design of Solid Spallation Targetsat PSI

G. Heidenreich

Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI

Switzerland

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich2

Neutron Spallation Sources at PSI (SINQ)

Beam loss

Target E Station

30 % with 40 mm Target E

SINQ (DC-Operation) 570 MeV, 1.4 mA

Target

D2O-Moderator

p

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich3

Neutron Spallation Sources at PSI (UCN)

Ultra Cold Neutron Source UCN(in construction) 590 MeV, 2 mA

UCN-Storage Tank

D2-Moderator (8K)

D2O-Moderator (R.T.)

Target

p

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich4

Layout of the SINQ & UCN Solid Targets

UCN-Target:Pulsed operation: 8 seconds beam on (2 mA 590 MeV) 1.2 MW beam power on target; 1% duty cycleBeam parameter: Gaussian beam spot (cut by collimator at R = 2.5 σ); Peak current density 20 μA/cm2

SINQ-Target:Continuous operation: (1.4 mA 570 MeV) 0.8 MW beam power on targetBeam parameter: Gaussian beam spot (cut by collimator II); Peak current density ~35 μA/cm2

p

∅ 212 mm

1 m

p∅ 269 mm

Target hull Target array Shielding Target shaft D O coolant supply2

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich5

SINQ - Target

Pb filled stainless steel tubes

Pb filled Zy-2 tubes

Targetcooling

Windowcooling

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich6

Power Deposition (590 MeV p-beam)

~70 % of the beam power deposited in the target assembly

flow guides Zy-2 rods or Pb filled Zy-2 tubes Al-clad Pb shielding (320 MeV/p) (1.2 MeV/p)

beam window target hull D2O(4.8 MeV/p) (4.5 MeV/p) (90 MeV/p)

Target cooling18 kg/s D2O

Window cooling2.5 kg/s D2O

UCN - Target

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich7

Layout of the Target Array

Target array options: SINQ: UCN:I. solid Zircaloy rods 1996/98II. Pb filled Stainless Steel tubes 1999/2005III. Pb filled Zircaloy tubes 2004/2005 > 2007

11.04 mm

Pb

Transversal pitch12.75 mm

2 mm

Ø 10.75 mm

Stainless Steelor

Zircaloy tubes90 % filled with Pb

Vfluid = 0.5 m/s

dm/dF = 500 kg/s/m2

Tb = 40°C

·

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich8

Neutronic Performance

Relative thermal flux

gain

Zy-2 rods(64.5% Zr, 35.5% D2O)

Pb-SS304-Cladding (48% Pb, 11.5% SS304, 34.9% D2O, 5.6% Void)

Pb-Zy2-Cladding

(42.9% Pb, 16.7%Zr, 35.5% D2O, 4.9% Void)

UCN 1) 1.00 *) 1.38 1.61

SINQ 2) 1.00 *) 1.42 1.63 **)

1) M. Wohlmuther, G. Heidenreich Design and neutronic performance of the spallation target of the ultra-cold neutron source UCN at PSI, ICANS-XVII, April 25-29, 2005 Santa Fe, New Mexico

2) E.J. Pitcher, J.R. Lebenhaft, E.H. Lehmann, An Investigation of Neutron Spallation Targets in SINQ usingMCNPX, ICANS-XVI, Proceedings of ICANS-XVI, Düsseldorf-Neuss, Germany May 12-15, Vol. III, p.1191, ISSN 1433-559X (2003).

*) ~ 4.5·10 13 n/cm2/s/mA **) ~ 20 % flux gain for MEGAPIE

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich9

Thermo-hydraulic operating regime of the target array

Vfluid = 0.5 m/sdm/dF = 500 kg/s/m2

p = 0.5 MpaTsat = 150 °C

Tbulk = 40 °C

σ : Standard deviationof the Gaussiandistributed beam

σ (cm)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 1 2 3 4 5

Bea

m C

urre

nt (m

A)

UCNSINQ

Critical HeatFlux 3b)

SaturatedBoiling 3a)

High subcooling regime 2)

Forced convection regime 1)

Low subcooling regime 2)

1) V. Gnielinski, VDI-Wärmeatlas,19982) M.M. Shah, Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow Vol.5, No. 1,1984.3a) M.Z. Hazan et al., J.Heat Trans. 103, 478 (1981).3b) H.J. Ivey , D.J. Morris, UKAEA, AEEW-R137,1962.

·

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich10

Thermo-mechanical design of the Pb-filled tubes for pulsedoperation in the UCN-target

Design steps:

Measurement of stress-strain relation of Pb ⇒ σ = f( T, dε/dt)

Calculation of temperature response of Pb

Calculation of stress response in the tube wall

Pb

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich11

Measured stress-strain relations of Pbstrain rate dε /dt = 7 10-6 s-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01

Strain ε

Stre

ss (N

/mm

2 )

20 deg C100 deg C150 deg C

strain rate dε /dt = 0.01 s-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01

Strain ε

Stre

ss (N

/mm

2 )

20 deg C100 deg C150 deg C300 deg C (extrapolated)

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich12

Temperature & stress response due to the heat load by theproton pulse (peak current density 20 μA/cm2)

Fatigue limit(106 cycles) of Zy-2 :

⇒ 235 N/mm2 (20 °C)

K.U. Snowden et al., J. Nucl. Mat. 67,p.215, 1977.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 2.5 5 7.5 10Time (s)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

2. No heat contact Pb-Zy2 (sliding contact)

1. Perfect intermetallic contact Pb-Zy2

Temperature response of Pb

0

50

100

150

200

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Time (s)St

ress

(MPa

)

1. Perfect intermetallic contact Pb-Zy2

2. Sliding contact Pb-Zy2 (no heat contact)

Stress response of Zy-2 cladding

dT/dt = 300°C/s

⇒ strain rate: dε/dt = α⋅dT/dt = 0.01 s-1

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich13

Temperature & stress distribution

190 N/mm2

10cm

10.7

5 m

m

40 °C

240 °C

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich14

Hydrogen production in the target array

LAHET Calculation :

Peak values for Pb-filledZr-tubes per year (10 Ah):

UCN: ~ 3 wppmSINQ: ~ 500 wppm

0 10 20 30 400.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

ZrPb

Position (cm)

H-a

tom

s/cm

3/ F

luen

ce(p

/cm

2 )

Neutron Radiography Method *):

Measured peak value of hydrogencontent for a Zr-rod irradiated at position 8 cm in SINQ.

~ 70 wppm H / 3·1021 p/cm2

⇒ 0.1 (atoms/cm3) / (p/cm2)*) E. Lehmann, PSI

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich15

Beam window design

Flow guide

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich16

Fluid velocity at window center

UCN : 2.5 m/s

SINQ : 6 m/sMass flow 2.5 kg/s D2O

CFD - Analysis

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich17

Thermo-hydraulic operating regimes of the UCN and SINQ window

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Heat Flux (MW/m2)

Wal

l Tem

pera

ture

(°C

) UCN

SINQ

Fluid velocityUCN: 2.5 m/sSINQ: 6 m/s

Normal operation

Forced convection regime

Subcooled boiling regime

M.M. Shah, Heat Transfer Eng., Vol 4, No.1, 1983

Critical heat flux

S. Mirshak et al., SavannahRiver, DP-355,1959

Quadrupol failure320 μA/cm2

Beam misses target E (40 mm)~ 900 μA/cm2

Tsat = 150°C

2nd High-Power Targetry Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, October 10-14, 2005 / G. Heidenreich18

Thank you for your attention !