determinant factors and consequences of customer satisfaction in vietnamese internet...
TRANSCRIPT
College of Management
I-Shou University
Master Thesis
Determinant Factors and Consequences
of Customer Satisfaction in Vietnamese
Internet Banking Sector
Advisor: Dr. Heidi Chang
Graduate Student: Duong Phuong Linh (Candy)
January 2015
2
Acknowledgements
In order to finish this thesis, I was granted a lot of assistance, guidance and
supervision from professors, respondents and supporters. Hence, I want to thank to all who
support, direct and motivate me throughout the process of completing the research.
Especially, I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Heidi
Chang who initiated the project; guided and suggested me a lot of valuable and constructive
comments; and gave me a good opportunity to complete my Master thesis.
Besides, I would like to express my deep gratitude to our research committee members
who assisted to improve my thesis paper. They worked hard and corrected my mistakes and
errors to help my thesis better. I also want to thank all the respondents who have paid time to
get through the entire survey with their enthusiastic and supporting manner.
Moreover, I am particularly grateful for my family, my friends and my classmates.
They always trusted and supported me when the study difficulties came. Their deepest love
and sacrifice were spiritual inspiration to cheer me up. Lastly, thanks are extended to
everyone who encouraged and guided me to finish my research work directly and indirectly.
3
Abstract
The development of Internet-based technologies in the last two decades significantly
changes the way businesses operate. Banking sector is along with the evolution of computer
and specialized technologies in order to provide the highest quality to customers. Internet
Banking is new service so it pays more and more attention of customers in Vietnam.
Internet Banking services and perceived value is basically essential to satisfy and retain
customers. They are also the critical elements to achieve customer satisfaction and then
leads to customer loyalty and brand reputation. These research findings showed that there is
positive relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction, perceived value and
customer satisfaction, brand reputation and customer satisfaction, as well as customer
loyalty and customer satisfaction.
Key works: Internet Banking, Banking Sector, Customer Satisfaction, Service
Quality, and Perceived Value
4
Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... 2
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. 3
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... 6
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ 7
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 8
1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 8
1.2. Research Objectives ................................................................................................. 9
1.3. Research Questions ................................................................................................. 10
1.4. Research Significance ............................................................................................ 10
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................... 11
2.1.InternetBanking ........................................................................................................ 11
2.2.CustomerSatisfaction ................................................................................................ 12
2.2.1. Definition ...................................................................................................... 12
2.2.2. Models of Assessing Customer Satisfaction................................................ 13
2.3.PerceivedValue .......................................................................................................... 14
2.4.ServiceQuality ............................................................................................................ 16
2.5.BrandReputation ....................................................................................................... 17
2.6.CustomerLoyalty ......................................................................................................... 19
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 21
3.1.ConceptualFramework ............................................................................................... 21
3.2.ResearchDesign .......................................................................................................... 22
3.3.Sampling ....................................................................................................................... 23
3.4.Measures ...................................................................................................................... 24
3.4.1 Measures ......................................................................................................... 24
3.4.2 Key Variables .................................................................................................. 24
3.5.DataAnalysis ................................................................................................................ 27
CHAPTER 4: RESULT AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................... 29
4.1DescriptiveAnalysis ..................................................................................................... 29
4.2MeanandStandardDeviation .................................................................................... 32
4.3ReliabilityCronbach’sAlpha ....................................................................................... 35
4.3.1 Perceived value ............................................................................................... 37
4.3.2 Service quality ................................................................................................. 37
4.3.3 Customer satisfaction...................................................................................... 38
4.3.4 Brand reputation ............................................................................................. 38
4.3.5 Customer loyalty ............................................................................................. 38
4.3Hypothesistesting ........................................................................................................ 38
4.3.1 Correlation test ............................................................................................... 39
5
4.3.2 Linear regression analysis .............................................................................. 41
4.4OnewayANOVAanalysis ............................................................................................. 43
4.4.1:Thedifferencesofperceivedvalue,servicequality,brandreputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’age ................. 43
4.4.2Thedifferencesofperceivedvalue,servicequality,brandreputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’job .................. 44
4.4.3Thedifferencesofperceivedvalue,servicequality,brandreputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’monthly
income ...................................................................................................................... 46
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................ 48
5.1 Researchsummary ............................................................................................... 48
5.2 TheoreticalandPracticalimplication ............................................................... 49
5.3 Researchlimitations and Futureresearch........................................................ 52
5.4 Concludingstatement .......................................................................................... 53
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 55
APPENDIX A ......................................................................................................................... 61
APPENDIX B......................................................................................................................... 65
6
List of Tables
Table3.1:Thesourcesofmeasurementscale…………………………………………………….25
Table4.1Demographiccharacteristicsforoverallrespondents………………………….30
Table4.2:Descriptivestatisticsforvariables……………………………………………………...33
Table4.3:Reliabilityanalysis…………………………………………………………………………….35
Table4.4:ReliabilityCronbach’salphaofrespectivefactors……………………...……….37
Table4.5:Correlation Matrix…………..……………………………………………………………...40
Table4.6:ANOVAsummary……………………………………………………………………………...41
Table4.7:Coefficientsummary…………………………………………………………..…………….42
Table4.8:Oneway ANOVA tests of variables among respondent’s age…..……………….43
Table4.9:Oneway ANOVA tests of variables among respondent’s job…..……….……….44
Table4.10:Oneway ANOVA of monthly income……...………………………………………….46
7
List of Figures
Figure3.1:Frameofthestudy………………………………………………………….………………..21
Figure4.1:Agedistributionofrespondents……………………………………………………....30
Figure4.2:Monthlyincomedistribution…………………………………………………………....32
8
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Introduction
The development of Internet-based technologies in the last two decades
significantly changes the way businesses operate. Information and communication are
exchanged rapidly and therefore it leads to the development and expansion of service
sector. As the inevitable result, electronic commerce holds the prominent position in
the global market by delivering an inexpensive, direct and immediate way to sell or
buy products and services as well as deliver information (Abor, 2004). Banking sector
is along with the evolution of computer and specialized technologies in order to provide
the highest quality to customers. Jagdish (2008) stated that the beginning step to attain
success derived from how leaders deal with long-term relationship with new and potential
customers. It seems more reasonable provided costs to potential customers using Internet
Banking in financial services sector. They can connect and use at any place and any time
over the world with just a click. Moreover, due to breakthrough in technology in recent
decades and easiness to browse into World Wide Web, Internet has brought an easy
channel and method to manage customer’s banking account, make necessary enquiries
and undertake banking transactions.
In Vietnam, Internet Banking is new service so it has not received much attention
of customers. It is on the process of advertising to attract new users and broadening the
market. The commercial banks almost offer Internet banking services in their operation
nowadays. The Director of Operations and Technology Division of Techcombank, one
of the leading banks in the technology sector in Vietnam market, said: "We see
technology as a core part of the strategy business strategy and we are committed to
focus all resources to develop this area, create a sustainable competitive advantage. In
9
addition to the average investment of $ 15 million per year for several consecutive years
for the technology, banking has also focused human development with a team of
experienced professionals from the leading banks in Vietnam and world “(Doan, 2013).
Using a smart phone or a computer with a network connection, the consumers’ needs are
rapidly performed via a few clicks.
However, there is a real situation of insecurity services using Internet banking in
Vietnam. Some customers have lacked money to hackers. The Internet banking system
has still some weaknesses in securing customers’ account. Therefore, the need to ensure
customers’ rights and enhance their attitudes and awareness to Internet Banking services
is basically essential to retain customers. It is explained the importance of customer
satisfaction to reach customer loyalty.
1.2. ResearchObjectives
Internet banking services face a number of challenges in the operation process.
Al-Sukkar and Hasan (2004) had indicated some major issues in their study: data and
network security, especially privacy problems, lack and limitations of government
policies, regulations and legislation to protect users and to make the Internet secure,
lack of infrastructure and weak telecommunications, broken and slow Internet
connections, lack of Internet awareness, especially in the rural areas. Internet banking
there is still unaccepted therefore enhancing customers’ awareness about benefits of
Internet banking services could encourage a higher level of acceptance, customers
tend to be fear in using Internet Banking services because they think any mistake and
error could cause a loss of money, connection costs and costs of building and
managing Internet Banking system seems unreasonable.
10
Therefore, the study tries to measure and find understanding of factors affecting
adoption of Internet Banking services and its possible consequences in Vietnam and
find out the influence determinants towards customer satisfaction.
1.3. ResearchQuestions
The research aims to examine which factors influence to customer satisfaction
by replying the following questions:
1. What is the real situation of Internet Banking service in Vietnam?
2. What is the level of customers’ awareness of using Internet Banking services?
3. Which factors mostly influence customer satisfaction?
4. What benefits banks achieve when its customers satisfy?
5. What solutions should be recommended to enhance customer satisfaction?
1.4. ResearchSignificance
The thesis aims to provide an explanation on the Determinant Factors and
Consequences of Customer Satisfaction Using Internet Banking in Vietnam. This
research can be applied in Vietnam and other countries because it is an essential need to
realize factors being responsible for maintaining customer satisfaction in internet
banking services. This topic isn't somehow new, but it is to be one of the meaning basis
researches to support for the development of internet banking system in Vietnam.
11
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW
The basic idea of this chapter is to discuss the main concepts of the study and
find out the conceptual framework and models in assessing customer satisfaction
using Internet banking services.
2.1.InternetBanking
Internet banking is defined as “the usage of Internet and telecommunication
networks to deliver banking services to customers” (Nguyen & Singh, 2004). Daniel
(1999) describes that customer is able to connect Internet via high technology media
as computer, television, cable phone or mobile phone, and PDA to use offer banking
products and services. Customer can gather interested information and use most
banking services such as checking account balance, making banking transfers,
deducting for registered monthly bills and invoices, buying online products and
services and using money in advance even without money with Credit card and paying
interest later.
Due to differences on user’s requirement (i.e. Strategic objectives for e-banking;
Scope, scale, and complexity of equipment, systems, and activities; Technology
expertise; and Security and internal control requirements), Internet banking system
varies in configuration. The following is a sample of Internet banking architecture (IT
examination Handbook InfoBase, 2003). Internet Banking is a substitute channel of
distribution of financial services which becomes a competitive advantage of operation
process in global basis. Also, it gives advantages to both bankers and customers. It has
low cost transactions, saves times and increases employees’ productivity. Tuchilla (2000)
listed some other benefits such as an ability to customize users’ accounts, innovation of
new products and services, and the lowest cost of communication and advertising.
12
With over 40% of the population uses the Internet (2013), Vietnam is a potential
destination for attracting and retaining customers using Internet Banking services. Since
Internet banking is given to Vietnamese market for ten years, Internet banking services
are increasingly popular and attract more and more users. According to estimates, until
the end of 2013, the number of people using the service has increased by 45% for the last
three years. Vietnam Banking Association said 40 banks have announced deployment
internet banking system at different levels so far. IB is the most powerful system of
several major banks like Vietcombank and Techcombank commercial banks.
2.2.CustomerSatisfaction
2.2.1.Definition
Although the term “customer satisfaction” is popularly recognized and valued
in business environment, it has been arguing how to define the term. Kotler & Keller
(2006) defines satisfaction is “a person’s feelings of pleasure or disappointmnet
resluting from comparing a product’s performance (outcome) in relation to his
expectation”. According to Oliver (1981), satisfaction is apsychological state resulting
from a process of emotional and cognitive evaluation. Since customers have their own
attitudes and experience, they value outcome with different level of satisfaction.
Customer satisfaction means “a measure of how your organization’s total products’
performs in relation to a set of customer requirements (Hill, Brierley, & MacDougall,
2003). And therein, customer satisfaction of Internet banking services mean that banks
fully attain customer’s expectations. Anderson et al. (1994) clearly categorizes
banking customer satisfaction into two conceptialization: transaction-specific and
overal satisfaction. The first one results from a specific service encounter transaction’
experience while the other is the result of overal transactions. The more expectations
are met or exceeded, the more an organization attain comprtitive advantages compared
13
to other competitors.The gap of expectation and real outcome is as short as possible
will get more customers’ loyalty.
2.2.2.ModelsofAssessingCustomerSatisfaction
There are a number of models used to assess customer satisfaction. Firstly,
Swedish Customer Satisfaction Barometer (SCSB) was constructed by Fornel and his
colleagues under supervision of University of Michigan-National Quality Research
Center and the Swedish Center in 1989. The model describes two primary drivers of
satisfaction: perceived value and customer expectations. Perceived value is the
comparison between the price paid and quality received, while expectation is about
customer’s desire products and services. The second connection is customer’s
complaints and his loyalty/commitment to bought products and services.
Secondly, American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) is introduced in 1994
by American Quality Association and University of Michigan Business School. The
model which is constructed based on the knowledge of SCSB model, is the
satisfaction of American consumer about products and services in local market. ACSI
explains the link of input factors (perceived quality, perceived value and expectations)
and the outcome (customer’s complaints and loyalty). It differs from SCSB by breaking
down perceived quality of perceived value.
The European Customer Satisfaction Index (ECSI) is an analytical tool to
harmonize customer satisfaction index and support organizations’ marketing strategy
under encouragement of European Quality Institute and European Quality
Management. ECSI is divided by two sub-models, i.e. structural model and measurement
model. Customer satisfaction is the central variable related to drivers: company’s image,
14
perceived quality, perceived value and expectations. The significant outcome of these
links is customer’s loyalty.
Using these above knowledge and through empirical studies, Nguyen and Singh
(2004) developed a conceptual model of the relationships between Internet banking
system and customer satisfaction and loyalty. The model explains the relationship of
customer characteristics (age, income, education, experience, disability and emotion);
Internet banking system quality (transaction speed, ease of use, convinience,
accessibility, costs vs benefits, security/privacy, and user powerment) ; cusomer
system contraints (user’s software, hardware and Internet bandwith); and customer
satisfaction. If customers are satisfied with bank attributes like brand reputation, costs,
convinience and banking service quality, they will be loyal to the bank’s services.
2.3.PerceivedValue
Perceived value can be confirmed like as a difference between total consumers
value that a consumer can get from a product or a service. Evaluating, receiving, using
and eliminating any product or any service is incurred from total customer cost (Roig
et al., 2006). Value is the judgment behavior of preference by customers toward
products and services (Gan et al, 2005). Value refers to: function of overall quality and
price of the firm’s products and services compared to the competitors” (Mokhtar et al,
2005). The sellers can't confirm perceived value exactly, only customer can perceive
this value because they are people who directly use the product or the service. When
customer decides to buy any product or any service from any company, they will
inspect and evaluate customer value as a method to decision standard to choose their
suit product or the best service for them. Therefore, the key success for their
organization is focused on supplying value for their customers.
15
There are two major approaches can be discovered about the level of perceived
value. The first approach defines perceived value as a construct what has two parts,
one benefit gets and one benefits sacrifices (Dodds et al., 1991; Cronin et al., 2000).
Customer benefits are those value derived from quality of product or services and a
chain of psychological benefits. The sacrifices component is formed from monetary
and non-monetary (Dodds et al, 1991.). The second approach defines perceived value
of customers like as a multidimensional construct (De Ruyter et al., 1997 & 1998;
Sweeney & Soutar, 2001; Roig et al., 2006). It means that perceived value has five
main components which are social value, emotional value, functional value, epistemic
value and conditional value (Sheth et al., 1991).
Customer perceived value is the basis of all marketing activity. Higher value
leads to users’ higher motivation of purchasing the firm’s products and services. In
PERVAL model, Jillian and Geoffrey (2001) broke down elements of perceived value
as quality, emotional value, price and social value.
(1) Quality: the value derived from actual quality comparing with a product’s or
service’s expected performance.
(2) Emotional value: the value which explains the feelings or affective states from
real experience of using products or services.
(3) Price: the value which stated the lower on costs in short-term and long-term
period.
(4) Social value: the value which defined and enhanced self- concept of a product or
service.
16
Higher perceived value will achieve more customers awareness and preferences
of products and services. And therefore it will have a positive effect on customer
satisfaction.
H1: There is a positive relationship between perceived value and customer
satisfaction.
2.4.ServiceQuality
Almost businessman understands the importance of service quality provided to
customers but it is continuously arguing how to define the term “service quality”. The
term mainly defined under customers’ view as the result of service that achieves their
expectations. It influence customer’s experience and volatile the demand volume of
products and services sold. Under financial managers’ point of view, service quality
must be assessed as a core strategy of business performance because it impacts the
company’s profit and financial indicators (Hinson, Mohammed, & & Mensah, 2006)
as well as the company’ image. Service quality is considered as a sustainable
competitive advantage to competitors (Kotler & Keller, 2006; Gronroos, 2001) and a
measurement of products’ and services’ improvement process. Under Internet banking
sector, service quality has been identified as the gap between service expectation and
service performance or the comparison of what customers expect to receive and what they
actually receive (Gefen, 2002). Service quality often depends on the current and past
experience of customers (Berry & Leonard, 1995). The higher service quality is provided,
the higher customers satisfy.
In order to analyze and deeply understand Internet banking service quality, it is
necessary to get knowledge of elements relevant to achieving service quality, i.e.
accessibility, convenience, speed, fees and charges, website content and design. Firstly,
17
accessibility is the capacity to acquire information and services from a bank’s website
depending on user’s hardware and software; internet connection; size and format of
documents (Goodwin-Jones, 2001). The vital strength is the ability to access information
centers at any time with immediate responsiveness. Next, today, Internet banking is
configured to help user access online service such as internet banking, telephone banking,
mobile banking, ATM & so on at all time and place. Internet banking is easy to access is
an advantage better understand of website contents & applications. Plus, the speed &
responsiveness will be a main concern of information system & e-commerce. Therefore,
the link of downloading speed & user’s satisfaction speed & time fees & changes of
Internet banking services is much lower than documented process making. It’s save time
of employees & divided by smaller load of work, so that bank can save administrative
costs. In respect of customers’ viewpoints, they expect all products and services achieve
the highest quality. A positive perception of customers about the quality of Internet
banking services will be a contribution on customer satisfaction. The higher quality is
provided, the better customers satisfy.
H2: There is a positive relationship between service quality and customer
satisfaction.
2.5.BrandReputation
Brand is a symbol describing an organization’s name, term, symbol, design
and products and services compared to other rivals (American Marketing Association,
1995). Na, Marshall, and Keller (1999) argued that "image cannot be measured by
attribute measurements alone but must include measurements of consumers' perceptions
of the value and benefits attainable from using the brand" (p. 171). This indicates that
the effectiveness of test images is very important so it affect to consumer satisfaction
clearly. Brand image is considered as a faithful combination between consumers in the
18
brand –specific. Brand image has influence and motivate buying behavior of consumers
if the brand image of quality assurance products for consumer awareness (Kotler and
Gertner, 2002). Perceived brand image has an effect on customer satisfaction and a
customer's beliefs about brand. They are sourced from personal use experience,
word-of-mouth endorsements/criticisms, and/or the marketing efforts of firms
(Woodruff et. al., 1983). In banking sector, one of the most essential aspects is a
brand awareness what refers to the banks reputation and expiable bank place in the
banking industry (Che-Ha & Hashim, 2007; Reynolds, 2007).
The measure about customer experience is how customer fills with the brand
image or the services. Some combination of beliefs about the brand’s various
performance dimensions determines a perceived overall brand performance (Woodruff
et al., 1983; Che-Ha & Hashim, 2007). An important factor is a brand image perception
what provides by service because customer satisfaction with brand image can promote
service to others around them. According to Park et al (1986), the organization brand
image is measured by customers’ perceptions of value and benefits achievable from
use of brand. The scholar highly values the importance of brand’s benefits. Benefits
are derived from functional needs, experiential needs and symbolic needs. ACSI
proved the close link of reputation and customer satisfaction through a number of
marketing researches. Internet banking reputation refers to the bank’s well-known
and the standing in the banking industry (Che-Ha & Hashim, 2007). Kotler &
Gertner (2002) provide evidence that a well known brand will assure quality of
products and services provided. Thus, it has a great effect on purchasing behavior
and motivation of customers.
Reputation is assessed as an evaluation of the consistency over time of an entity’s
operation and performance (Herbig & Milewicz, 1993). So in an organization, there are
possibilities of reputations as cost, product quality, global reputations or creative
19
reputations. Reputation is said to be understood not only in the web. It also depends on
the whole organization (Casalo et al., 2008). Moreover, reputation is considered as a
consequence what can interactive between business and its environment. The company
and customers will have certain interactions as a source of information can help their
customers to assess more clearly about offered quality (Yoon, Guffey & Kijewski, 1993).
Standifird et al. (1999) also said that reputation depends on assess about company from
desirability what is be viewed from a number of people or a group of people from the
external. According to researchers, a good brand reputation is a result of customers’
purchasing and assessing process. If a company provides good quality and high value of
products and services, customers will be satisfied. Customer satisfaction is the best and
fastest marketing tool to retain existing customers and attract new customers; therefore,
it leads to customer loyalty and builds up a well-known brand reputation.
H3: There is a positive relationship between brand reputation and customer
satisfaction.
2.6.CustomerLoyalty
Many researchers have indicated the importance of loyalty to business’ success.
Oliver (1997) defined customer loyalty as “a deeply commitment to repurchase or
re-patronize a preferred products or services in the future which cause repetitive
same-brand or same-brand set purchasing”. Loyalty has two main criteria: behavior and
attitude (Ranaweera et al, 2003). Customer commitment means a strength of good
relationship among customer and the entity and a desire to keep using its products and
services. When customers are satisfied, they come to repurchase products more
frequently; tend to be willing to try new products and services; buy only from you and
also suggest recommendations and give feedback to improve.
It is noted that businesses need to well monitor and manage their relationships
20
with both existing and potential customers. This is called the transformation process
which describes how a business makes customers be loyal. It is critical to note that a
satisfied customer does not necessarily mean a loyal customer. Any breach of trust from
previous transactions can seriously result a negative relationship with customers. It is
quite difficult and challenging to make a customer from satisfied to loyal. This is why it
is so essential to keep an eye on customer satisfaction, and correct any possibly bad
situations. Delivering outstanding service to customer and always paying close attention
to customers’ needs and are a must. Therefore, it is essential and necessary to keep in
mind that customer satisfaction is an important element to create customer loyalty.
H4: There is a positive relationship between customer loyalty and customer
satisfaction.
21
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY
In term of aim and nature of studied problem, this chapter mainly describes main
steps of methodology process. Firstly, the study starts with conceptual framework. Next
is research design. Sampling design and data collection is the next step to collect
information from respondents. And then the study explains operational definitions of
variables discussed on this thesis. Finally, data are sorted and inserted in SPSS software
to get statistic outputs.
3.1.ConceptualFramework
Based on chapter 2 “literature review”, Figure 3.1 demonstrates the research
conceptual framework which gives explanation about the relationship among customer
satisfaction and the determinants including perceived value, service quality, customer
loyalty and brand reputation in Vietnam Internet Banking Sector.
22
3.2.ResearchDesign
The methodology has two main categories: quantitative method and qualitative
method. Quantitative method is “to generate statistics through the use of large-scale
survey research, using methods such as questionnaires or structured interviews” whilst
qualitative method is “to explore attitudes, behavior and experiences through such
methods as interviews or focus groups” (Saunders et al. 2009). In the study,
quantitative approach is chosen to explore customer satisfaction in Internet banking
sector, using survey as method of investigation.
The variables of our research are service quality, perceived value, brand
reputation, customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. The hypotheses will be
established basing on the framework. Questionnaire will be made and delivered to the
respondent in order to collect data. The respondent is customers using Internet Banking
in Vietnam. The following steps illustrate the process of preparing questionnaire and
collecting the data for the research:
(1) Questionnaire Back - Translation
Questionnaires were translated into Vietnamese because they will be delivered to
Vietnamese people using Internet banking. This is necessary to make clear and avoid
misunderstanding, and it needs to make sure that the questionnaire is designed carefully
based on research objectives. Originally, the questionnaire is designed in English
version since the thesis is processed in English. Thus, it is necessarily translated into
Vietnamese version in order to receive accurate information and assessment from
respondents.
(2) Pre-test
Before spreading the questionnaire, it must be rechecked carefully to avoid any
misunderstanding or unclear meaning
23
(3) Pilot Study
A pilot study is to verify the reliability of the scale items: I give my questionnaire
for 3 professors, 3 bankers, 4 customers, 3 classmates who can help me for pre-check
my questionnaire before I spread it to customers.
(4) Questionnaire survey
The questionnaire will be sent to respondents in three big cities. There are two
main methods of data collection, i.e. by emails through Internet: Google email, Skype,
Facebook, Yahoo and by hard copies directly from customers who uses banks’ services
over the counter. Questionnaires were translated into Vietnamese to get easily
understanding and accurate information from respondents. The main collection data
method is depended on the questionnaires from customers through internet Google doc
via email, Skype, Facebook, Yahoo. It finds very useful in limited time and receives a
large number of reply.
3.3.Sampling
Population is defined as “the complete set of units of analysis that are under
investigation, while element is the unit from which the necessary data is collected”
(Stapleton, 2006). The core function of this study is to investigate determinant factors
and consequences of customer satisfaction using Internet banking in Vietnam. Therefore,
the target population is residents in Vietnam. However the research can only carried out
in Ha Noi Capital, Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang city because of limitation of time. In
this paper, a convenience sampling method is employed because of the ease to access.
According to Saunders et al. (2009), a larger sample size will be more representative for
the population rather than the smaller one. Thus, the mean of the sample is more
representative to population mean which is explained as the law of large numbers.
Hence, 250 surveys are delivered to respondents from different ages, gender, jobs and
24
education background. Respondents are chosen from customer lists with odd listing
numbers up to collect enough 250 surveys during a week in three cities. Surveys are
uploaded to “Google” website and then the link is going to be sent to respondent’s email.
The research surveys are under questionnaire type.
3.4.Measures
3.4.1Measures
In the thesis, several rating scales will be used due to different functions and
characteristics. Firstly, dichotomous scale is a measurement to answer questions under
“yes” or “no” choice. It deals with respondents’ demographic characteristics in the first
part of the survey. Secondly, ranking scale is mainly employed to rank variables. The
questionnaire is divided into two main sections: demographic and determinant factors
and consequences of customer satisfaction. The demographic section is general
information about a respondent such as age, gender, income level, marital status, and
education level. The second section consists of five subsections: quality, perceived value,
customer loyalty and brand reputation. These subsections used a five point Likert Scale
with ratings from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5). Likert scale is the most
popular instrument to measure factors affecting customer satisfaction and their possible
consequences using Internet banking services. Five-point Likert scale with ratings from
“strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5) is chosen.
3.4.2KeyVariables
Customer satisfaction is an experiencing process of purchasing and using
products and services. Customers set their own of expectations and if the products and
services met the requirements, customers are satisfied. But how does it measure?
Customer satisfaction is assessed by service quality and perceived value. Therefore, it is
25
a dependent variable. Plus, customer loyalty and brand reputation is an achievement of
customer satisfaction; hence they are dependent variables as well. Service quality and
perceived value are independent variables since they are essential elements affecting
customer satisfaction using Internet Banking.
The variable Service Quality was measured by Maroofi (2013) & Mojares (2014);
they are 6 items in the scale. The variable Perceived Value was measured for Moore and
Benbasat (1991); they are 9 items in the scale. The variable Brand Reputation was
measured for Homburg and Giering (2001); they are 9 items in the scale. The variable
Customer Loyalty were measured for Maroofi (2013)/ Homburg and Giering (2001);
they are 6 items in the scale. And the variable Customer Satisfaction was measured for
Homburg and Giering (2001); they are 9 items in the scale. The items of each scale
perform clearly through this figure.
Table 3.1: The sources of measurement scale
Constructs Items Adapted from
Service
Quality
1. Full information on product features and services offered
2. Internet banking is clear and easy to use
3. Website information is regularly updated
4. Internet banking is convenience and saves time
5. The confidentiality of customer’s data is ensured
6. Internet banking transactions are satisfactory worked
in term of security and privacy protection
Maroofi (2013)/
Mojares (2014)
26
Perceived
Value
1. Internet banking gives me greater control over my
finances
2. Transaction fees are reasonable
3. Internet banking service is good value of money
4. The use of Internet banking is relaxed
5. Internet banking is interesting to use
6. Using Internet banking for my banking services increase
my productivity
7. Using Internet banking improves my performance of
utilize banking service
8. Internet banking is compatible with my life and working
style
9. Internet banking offers a convienient cross-linked
transactions among banks
Moore and
Benbasat (1991)
Customer
Satisfaction
1. Internet banking makes it easy to find what I need
2. My expectation before using Internet banking is met with
my experience
3. Basing on my experience, Internet banking application is
quite pleasant
4. I am satisfied with Internet banking application
5. I am satisfied with the delivery of the overall service of
Internet banking
6. I am satisfied with quality and fee of Internet banking
service
7. I am satisfied with the first time installing and using
Internet banking
8. I am able to make transactions anywhere at any time I want
9. Customer service of Internet banking system is quick and
highly satisfied
Homburg and
Giering (2001)
27
Brand
Reputation
1. Internet banking has a good image in customer’s mind
2. Internet banking has a good reputation compared to
traditional banking services
3. Banking websites has a good reputation for offering wide
range and high quality of banking services
4. Banking websites have a good reputation on secure
customer’s confidential information
5. Internet banking has a good reputation on specialists’
ability to detect fraud and information theft
Mojares (2014)
Customer
Loyalty
1. I commit in frequent use of Internet banking service
2. I will use Internet banking service in the future
3. I will recommend friends and relatives using Internet
banking service
4. I will recommend Internet banking services to someone
who seeks my advice
5. I am eager to send feedback to improve futurely supplied
services
6. It is difficult to change my beliefs about Internet banking
Maroofi (2013)/
Homburg and
Giering (2001)
3.5.DataAnalysis
After gathering the questionnaires, raw data was sorted, checked for usability, and
inputted into an Excel file. In order to avoid duplicated or inaccurate data, it is essential
to apply a data treatment procedure. These include of checking errors due to wrong
typing or invalid questionnaires and then correct any wrong records. After that, the data
analysis will use SPSS version 20 software as a major tool to analysis the collected data.
The statistical procedures for quantitative research include Descriptive Statistic,
Reliability, Linear Regression Analysis and ANOVA Analysis. Descriptive statistics is
selected in order to understand the characteristics of the sample and included measures
28
of central tendency and variability (frequency, distribution, range and standard deviation)
for selected variables. Descriptive statistics is selected in order to measure selected
variables’ central tendency and variability (frequency, distribution, range and standard
deviation). ANOVA is performed to consider the difference in the assessment of factors
of each different customer’s perception on perceived value, service quality, and
company brand image, and customer satisfaction with customer satisfaction. Linear
Regressions would explain the interrelated relationship among testes variables with
customer satisfaction factor.
29
CHAPTER 4: RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This chapter is the analysis of collected data gathered from 205 respondent (return
rate is 82% out of 250 respondents) about Determinant Factors and Consequences of
Customer Satisfaction in Vietnamese Internet Banking Sector. The statistical analysis
includes:
- Description of respondents: Demographic analysis
- Compare mean and standard deviation
- Cronbach’s Alpha test
- Testing of hypotheses
- ANOVA analysis
To help clarify analysis, bar charts, tables, graphs showing percentages and trends are
employed to present collected data.
4.1DescriptiveAnalysis
Data is collected and analyzed by SPSS version 20. Total participated respondents are
250, and 205 questionnaires were pretreated and yielding an 82% respondents. After
categorizing data, 48.29 % of respondents were male and 51.71 % of respondents were
female. The age statistics clearly stated that the largest group of interviewees was those
from 26 to 35 years old accounted for 29.27% of 205 respondents. The age from 15 to 25
years old was the second rank with 24.88% (51 out of 205 respondents). The age group
from 46 to 55 has 18.05% while the group of 36 to 45 has 17.07%. The least age group was
those above 66 years old with only 0.98% of total participants. The below graph showed
frequency of age group (see Figure 4.1).
30
Figure 4.1: Age distribution of respondents
These statistics explained most participants using Internet Banking services are young
people like students (15.61%) who love exploring and high technology. Also the age from
36 to 55 years old were working respondents such as administrative / managerial with 32
respondents (15.61%); government/ state-enterprise staff with 36 respondents (17.56%);
professionals with 23 respondents (11.22%) and entrepreneurs with 24 respondents
(11.71%). Internet banking services are fast, convenient and flexible for those who are too
busy at work and have no time to queue and make transactions at banks. The others like
laborers or farmers group (6.34%); retired, unemployed or housewife group (7.80%);
commercial group (6.83%) and others job group (7.32%) have less frequency of using
Internet Banking. The results stated diversity patterns of age and jobs and may lead to
different levels of satisfaction of using Internet Banking services (see Table 4.1).
Table 4.1 Demographic characteristics for overall respondents
Variable Frequency
(N)
Percentage
(%)
Total participants 205 100
Gender
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
15~25 26~35 36~45 46~55 56~65 66 and over
31
Male 99 48.29
Female 106 51.71
Age
15~25 51 24.88
26~35 60 29.27
36~45 35 17.07
46~55 37 18.05
56~65 20 9.76
66 and over 2 0.98
Monthly Income
Under3 million VND 29 14.15
3~7 million VND 62 30.24
7~ 15 million VND 75 36.59
Over 15 million VND 39 19.02
Level of education
Less than High School 10 4.88
High School 28 13.66
College 117 57.07
Graduate 50 24.39
Job
Professionals 23 11.22
Laborers/Farmers 13 6.34
Variable Frequency
(N)
Percentage
(%)
Total participants 205 100
Students 32 15.61
Entrepreneurs 24 11.71
Administrative/Managerial 32 15.61
Government/State Enterprise 36 17.56
Retired/ Unemployed/Housewife 16 7.80
Commercial 14 6.83
Others 15 7.32
32
In term of education, most of participants were college graduated (117 out of 205
participants – 57.07%) and postgraduate (50 participants with 24.39%). Lower level was
high school graduated with 13.66% and the least were less than high school graduated with
4.88%. The majority of respondents (36.59 % and 30.24%) were those who had average
monthly income at VND 7 million to 15 million and VND 3 million to 7 million. 19.02%
had monthly income over VND 15 million. Monthly income under VND 3 million had
14.15% of respondents. These revealed that diversity of level of education and income level
would differently affect satisfaction levels of using IB services. The following chart
represented frequencies of respondents’ level of income:
Figure 4.3: Monthly income distribution
4.2MeanandStandardDeviation
Mean value is an important measure of respondent’s response in quantitative research.
Mean using in Likert 5 points indicates the level of agreement. In the study, four elements
of customers satisfaction model are (1) Perceived value, (2 ) Service quality, (3) Brand
reputation and (4) Customer loyalty.
14.15%,
30.24%
36.59%
19.02% Under3 million VND
3~7 million VND
7~ 15 million VND
Over 15 million VND
33
Table 4.2: Descriptive statistics for variables
Variables Items N Mean Std.
Deviation
Perceived
value
PV1. Internet banking gives me greater control over
my finances 205 3.40 1.308
PV2. Transaction fees are reasonable 205 3.31 1.070
PV3. Internet banking service is good value of money 205 3.43 1.030
PV4. The use of Internet banking is relaxed 205 3.54 1.045
PV5. Internet banking is interesting to use 205 3.50 1.123
PV6. Using Internet banking for my banking services
increase my productivity 205 3.57 1.044
PV7. Using Internet banking improves my
performance of utilize banking service 205 3.60 1.027
PV8. Internet banking is compatible with my life and
working style 205 3.49 1.060
PV9. Internet banking offers a convenient
cross-linked transactions among banks 205 3.58 1.159
Service
quality
SQ1. Full information on product features and
services offered 205 3.63 1.106
SQ2. Internet banking is clear and easy to use 205 3.63 .990
SQ3. Website information is regularly updated 205 3.59 .989
SQ4. Internet banking is convenience and saves time 205 3.65 1.001
SQ5. The confidentiality of customer’s data is ensured 205 3.79 1.044
SQ6. Internet banking transactions are satisfactory
worked in term of security and privacy protection 205 3.70 .973
Customer
satisfaction
CS1. Internet banking makes it easy to find what I
need 205 3.61 1.059
CS2. My expectation before using Internet banking is
met with my experience 205 3.61 .936
CS3. Basing on my experience, Internet banking
application is quite pleasant 205 3.60 1.007
CS4. I am satisfied with Internet banking application 205 3.56 1.001
34
Customer
satisfaction
CS5. I am satisfied with the delivery of the overall
service of Internet banking 205 3.60 1.007
CS6. I am satisfied with quality and fee of Internet
banking service 205 3.56 .893
CS7. I am satisfied with the first time installing and
using Internet banking 205 3.61 1.006
CS8. I am able to make transactions anywhere at any
time I want 205 3.59 1.014
CS9. Customer service of Internet banking system is
quick and highly satisfied 205 3.75 2.295
Brand
reputation
BR1. Internet banking has a good image in customer’s
mind 205 3.60 1.003
BR2. Internet banking has a good reputation
compared to traditional banking services 205 3.50 .953
BR3. Banking websites has a good reputation for
offering wide range and high quality of banking
services
205 3.40 1.088
BR4. Banking websites have a good reputation on
secure customer’s confidential information 205 3.45 .941
BR5. Internet banking has a good reputation on
specialists’ ability to detect fraud and information
theft
205 3.51 1.055
Customer
loyalty
CL1. I commit in frequent use of Internet banking
service 205 3.48 1.083
CL2. I will use Internet banking service in the future 205 3.59 .989
CL3. I will recommend friends and relatives using
Internet banking service 205 3.56 .946
CL4. I will recommend Internet banking services to
someone who seeks my advice 205 3.51 1.065
CL5. I am eager to send feedback to improve future
supplied services 205 3.68 1.053
CL6. It is difficult to change my beliefs about Internet
banking 205 3.59 1.038
35
The mean values were greater than 3 for all four variables. These results mean a
positive evaluation of Internet banking services. Customers had a quite high and satisfied
perception of Internet banking and its services. The average mean of variables equaled 3.49
for perceived value, 3.67 for service quality, 3.61 for customer satisfaction, 3.49 for brand
reputation, and 3.57 for customer loyalty.
Besides, standard deviation was also critical measurement to assess the level of
agreement. It showed a deviation of responses from the mean value. According to table 4.2,
standard deviation fluctuated from 0.893 to 2.295 which explained that observations were
around mean value of above variables. Therefore, respondents were slightly satisfied with
Internet banking services.
4.3ReliabilityCronbach’sAlpha
Due to using Likert 5 point scale, Cronbach’s alpha test was performed to assess
internal reliability. Five factors were tested with high results of internal consistence.
Nunnally (1978) indicated that Cronbach alpha coefficient is an effective tool to find
unmatched variables. Cronbach’s alpha is ranged from 0 to 1. Variables should be higher
than 0.6 and those are disqualified if they are less than 0.3. The analytical results of Alpha
coefficient were as the following table:
Table 4.3: Reliability analysis
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
Perceived value 1 121.37 818.831 .751 . .980
Perceived value 2 121.45 830.994 .723 . .980
Perceived value 3 121.33 830.958 .754 . .980
Perceived value 4 121.22 830.322 .752 . .980
Perceived value 5 121.26 824.712 .787 . .980
Perceived value 6 121.20 828.295 .788 . .980
36
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
Perceived value 8 121.27 826.484 .806 . .980
Perceived value 9 121.19 821.956 .804 . .980
Service quality 1 121.13 823.778 .815 . .980
Service quality 2 121.13 830.399 .795 . .980
Service quality 3 121.17 831.574 .775 . .980
Service quality 4 121.11 827.773 .833 . .980
Service quality 5 120.98 829.730 .763 . .980
Service quality 6 121.06 830.236 .812 . .980
Customer satisfaction 1 121.15 826.198 .812 . .980
Customer satisfaction 2 121.15 831.276 .826 . .980
Customer satisfaction 3 121.16 828.456 .815 . .980
Customer satisfaction 4 121.20 827.347 .840 . .980
Customer satisfaction 5 121.16 829.025 .805 . .980
Customer satisfaction 6 121.20 835.517 .783 . .980
Customer satisfaction 7 121.15 828.988 .807 . .980
Customer satisfaction 8 121.18 827.802 .821 . .980
Customer satisfaction 9 121.01 823.451 .365 . .985
Brand reputation 1 121.16 825.724 .868 . .980
Brand reputation 2 121.26 831.136 .814 . .980
Brand reputation 3 121.36 824.054 .825 . .980
Brand reputation 4 121.31 833.059 .788 . .980
Brand reputation 5 121.25 825.707 .823 . .980
Customer loyalty 1 121.28 822.929 .848 . .980
Customer loyalty 2 121.17 825.848 .878 . .980
Customer loyalty 3 121.20 830.321 .835 . .980
Customer loyalty 4 121.25 824.541 .835 . .980
Customer loyalty 5 121.08 827.043 .802 . .980
Customer loyalty 6 121.18 829.744 .768 . .980
37
Table 4.4: Reliability Cronbach’s alpha of respective factors
Factor Items Items deleted Cronbach’s Alpha
Perceived Value 9 No 0.951
Service Quality 6 No 0.942
Customer Satisfaction 9 No 0.898
Brand Reputation 5 No 0.933
Customer Loyalty 6 No 0.953
Nunnally and Bernstein (1994) stated that Cronbach’ alpha scores greater than 0.7 are
highly internal reliability. From table 4.2, in this research, the results show the Cronbach’s
alpha of respective factors in Perceived Value is 0.951; in Service Quality is 0.942; in Brand
Reputation is 0.933; in Customer Loyalty is 0.953 and in Customer Satisfaction is 0.898 so
all factors were above 0.7 meaning that they were highly reliable.
4.3.1Perceivedvalue
Perceived value is one independent variable of Customer satisfaction model using
Internet banking services in Vietnam. Item-to-total correlation of 9 items indicated that all
are satisfied and the cronbach’s alpha is higher than 0.6 (the standard measure). There were
no deleted items.
4.3.2Servicequality
As indicating in table 4.3 and 4.4 service quality has high degree of internal
consistency. There are no deleted items out of total of 6 items. The Cronbach alpha equals
0.942 which mean a high reliability of questionnaires. The total variance is also high with
strong loadings.
38
4.3.3Customersatisfaction
Customer satisfaction had a total of nine items. They all have a high cronbach’s alpha,
all are greater than 8 while the accepted level is from 6. It proved that the questionnaire
items are highly reliable.
4.3.4Brandreputation
Average Cronbach’s alpha of this 5 items were 0.933 which has a highly reliability.
There is no items are deleted. Brand reputation is considered as a strong loading variance.
4.3.5Customerloyalty
Customer loyalty had a Cronbach’s alpha greater than 7 and there were no deleted
items. This means customer loyalty is one strongly reliable element of these below tests.
4.3Hypothesistesting
After implementing Cronbach’s alpha test, this part of chapter tested four hypotheses
of this study:
H1: There is a positive relationship between perceived value and customer satisfaction
H2: There is a positive relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction
H3: There is a positive relationship between brand reputation and customer
satisfaction
H4: There is a positive relationship between customer loyalty and customer
satisfaction
For the core purpose of the study was investigating four independent variables:
perceived value (PV), service quality (SQ), brand reputation (BR) and customer loyalty (CL)
toward the dependent variable: customer satisfaction (CS).the correlation test and simple
linear regression were conducted.
39
4.3.1Correlationtest
Correlation is a critical measure to describe the relationship between two variables.
Pearson correlation coefficient, the most common measure, were used to test correlation
among variables perceived value, service quality, customer satisfaction, brand reputation
and customer loyalty. The measuring interval scale is between -1 and +1 showing
fluctuations of variables together. Value -1 means that variables have perfect direct linear
relation while value +1 means a perfect inverse linear relation between variables. Value 0
represents no linear relation. As proving, the closer is to value -1 or +1, the stronger
relations variables have (Evan, 1996).
The Table 4.5 showed positive relations among tested variables. Therefore, the
correlation between customer satisfaction and brand reputation were the strongest
relationship with r =.898 and Sig. (1-tailed) = .000< .05. Others variables (ie. customer
loyalty with r =.889, service quality with r =.882, perceived value with r =.826) had a
decreasing strength with the dependent element customers satisfaction. Customer satisfaction
is significantly correlated to perceived value (r=.826), service quality (r=.882), customer
loyalty (r=.889) and brand reputation (r=.898). Perceived value is significantly correlated to
customer satisfaction (r=.826), service quality (r=.860), customer loyalty (r=.798) and brand
reputation (r=.811). Service quality is significantly correlated to customer satisfaction
(r=.882), perceived value (r=.860), customer loyalty (r=.844) and brand reputation (r=.858).
Brand reputation is significantly correlated to customer satisfaction (r=.898), perceived value
(r=.811), service quality (r=.858) and customer loyalty (r=.897). Customer Loyalty is
significantly correlated to customer satisfaction (r=.889), perceived value (r=.798), service
quality (r=.844) and brand reputation (r=.897). The result of Pearson ranked hypotheses
indicated that all variables used in this study was positive significance to customer
satisfaction.
40
Table 4.5: Correlation Matrix
Customer
satisfaction
Perceived
Value
Service
Quality
Brand
Reputation
Customer
Loyalty
Pearson
Correlation
Customer satisfaction 1.000 .826*** .882*** .898*** .889***
Perceived Value .826*** 1.000 .860*** .811*** .798***
Service Quality .882*** .860*** 1.000 .858*** .844***
Brand Reputation .898*** .811*** .858*** 1.000 .897***
Customer Loyalty .889*** .798*** .844*** .897*** 1.000
Sig.
(1-tailed)
Customer satisfaction . .000 .000 .000 .000
Perceived Value .000 . .000 .000 .000
Service Quality .000 .000 . .000 .000
Brand Reputation .000 .000 .000 . .000
Customer Loyalty .000 .000 .000 .000 .
N Customer satisfaction 205 205 205 205 205
Perceived Value 205 205 205 205 205
Service Quality 205 205 205 205 205
Brand Reputation 205 205 205 205 205
Customer Loyalty 205 205 205 205 205
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-taied)
41
4.3.2Linearregressionanalysis
Table 4.6: ANOVA summary
Model Sum of Squares Df. Mean
Square F Sig.
1 Regression 125.454 4 31.364 379.401 .000
Residual 16.533 200 .083
Total 141.988 204
R Square= .884 (Adjusted R Square=.881)
Linear Regression model was used to measure how close the relationship of dependent
variable (CS) and others independent variables (PV, SQ, BR, CL) is. The equation of this
customer satisfaction is as the following:
Y (CS) = β0 + β1PV + β2SQ + β3BR + β4CL
According to table 4.6, where β0 = 0.245, β1 = 0.79, β2 = 0.258, β3 = 0.436 and β4 = 0.215;
and R square is 0.884, it means that the four variables explained 88.40% of customer
satisfaction variance in the attitude towards Internet banking services. It shows a high level of
variability of response data around its mean. Therefore, we have got regression model as
below:
Y (CS) = 0.245 + 0.79PV + 0.258SQ + 0.436BR + 0.215C
42
Table 4.7: Coefficient summary
Model
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) .245 .097 2.516 .013
Perceived Value .070 .044 .079 1.602 .111
Service Quality .253 .056 .258 4.507 .000
Brand
Reputation .410 .058 .436 7.013 .000
Customer
Loyalty .209 .058 .215 3.622 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Customer satisfaction
b. Indepent Variable: Perceived Value, Service Quality, Brand Reputation, Customer Loyalty
Among independent variables, brand reputation got the highest positive relation with
B=.436. The second rank was service quality with B=.258, the third was customer loyalty
with B=.215 and the least was perceived value with B=.079. Therefore, 88.40% of customer
satisfaction depended on PV, SQ, BR and CL, while the remaining of 11.60% was based on
other unstated variables in this study.
In short, all above results stated that the four null hypotheses are accepted. The four
variables (PV, SQ, BR and CL) had a positive relationship with variable customer
satisfaction.
43
4.4OnewayANOVAanalysis
In this part, ANOVA (Analysis of Variation) is used to investigate the differences of
perceived value, service quality, brand reputation, customer loyalty and customer
satisfaction among demographic factors such as job, monthly income and age.
4.4.1 The differences of perceived value, service quality, brand reputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’age
According to table 4.8 and an assumption of equal attitudes towards age groups, there
is no difference in respondents’ evaluation of perceived value among six groups of age with
F<3 and Sig>0.05. This means that all groups of age are offered the same value of Internet
banking services. Also other variables like service quality, brand reputation, customer
satisfaction and customer satisfaction offered homogeneous quality.
Table4.8:OnewayANOVAtestsofvariablesamongrespondent’sage
Variables Age Mean
Standard
deviation F Sig.
Accept
Perceived value 15-25 3.9020 1.04837
0.927 0.465 No
26-35 3.8830 0.86944
36-45 4.0300 0.90973
46-55 3.6550 0.90775
55-65 3.6722 0.99019
Over 66 3.2778 1.02138
Service quality 15-25 4.0294 0.97280
1.156 0.332 No
26-35 3.8918 0.81679
36-45 4.0811 0.69235
46-55 3.7149 0.80809
55-65 3.7667 0.94188
Over 66 3.4167 0.82496
44
Customer
satisfaction
15-25 3.9586 1.00122
0.912 .474 No
26-35 3.8441 0.81213
36-45 3.9970 0.75925
46-55 3.7982 0.69550
55-65 3.7222 0.76429
Over 66 3.0000 1.41421
Brand
reputation
15-25 3.9412 1.04234
1.157 0.332 No
26-35 3.7690 .88850
36-45 4.0676 .66488
46-55 3.7675 .76674
55-65 3.8083 .66066
Over 66 3.0000 1.41421
Customer
loyalty
15-25 3.9412 1.04234
1.486 0.165 No
26-35 3.7690 .88850
36-45 4.0676 .66488
46-55 3.7675 .76674
55-65 3.8083 .66066
Over 66 3.0000 1.41421
*F<3; Sig >0.05
4.4.2 The differences of perceived value, service quality, brand reputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’job
Table 4.9: One way ANOVA tests of variables among respondent’s job
Variables Job Mean
Standard
deviation F Sig.
Accept
Perceived value 1.Professionals 3.9275 .93900
1.486 0.165 No
2.Laborers/Farmers 3.7778 .93073
3.Students 3.4028 1.08012
4.Entrepreneurs 3.8889 .89427
5.Administrative/
6.Managerial 3.9132 .91002
45
7.Government/State
Enterprises 3.9691 .94229
8.Retired/Unemploy
ed/Housewife 4.1528 .66775
9.Commercial 4.1481 .75554
10.Others 3.8741 .85539
Service quality 1.Professionals 4.0145 .81945
0.862 0.549No
3.Students 3.5885 1.02826
4.Entrepreneurs 3.8860 .76991
5.Administrative/ .M
anagerial 3.9635 .86004
7.Government/State
Enterprises 4.0139 .77087
8.Retired/Unemploy
ed/Housewife 4.0938 .65819
9.Commercial 3.9778 .87484
10.Others 4.0333 .85030
Customer
satisfaction
1.Professionals 3.9275 .84527
1.211 0.294 No
2.Laborers/Farmers 4.0171 .92613
3.Students 3.5313 .97632
4.Entrepreneurs 3.7661 .69477
5.Administrative/
6.Managerial 3.9514 .89822
7.Government/State
Enterprises 3.9722 .57605
8.Retired/Unemploy
ed/Housewife 4.2083 .63619
9.Commercial 3.9185 .90897
10.Others 3.8000 1.04079
Brand
reputation
1.Professionals 3.7652 .97169
0.850 0.560
2.Laborers/Farmers 3.8615 .86172
3.Students 3.4938 1.06799
4.Entrepreneurs 3.7895 .63060
5.Administrative/
6.Managerial 3.8563 .93841
46
7.Government/State
Enterprises 3.9556 .77991
8.Retired/Unemploy
ed/Housewife 4.1000 .68896
9.Commercial 3.8267 .93462
10.Others 3.8400 1.02036
Customer
loyalty
1.Professionals 3.8478 .99483
1.286 0.253 No
2.Laborers/Farmers 3.9744 .76934
3.Students 3.4688 1.07133
4.Entrepreneurs 3.7544 .58628
5.Administrative/
6.Managerial 3.9010 .92444
7.Government/State
Enterprises 3.9861 .62154
8.Retired/Unemploy
ed/Housewife 4.1562 .66797
9.Commercial 3.9667 .85263
10.Others 3.9444 1.00725
*F<3; Sig >0.05
Table 4.9 indicated that there is no significant difference in respondents’ perceived
value, service quality, brand reputation, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. All F
value is lower than 3 and sig. > 0.05. this explained that Anova succeed in showing exact
results.
4.4.3 The differences of perceived value, service quality, brand reputation,
customerloyaltyandcustomersatisfactionamongrespondents’monthlyincome
Table4.10:OnewayANOVAofmonthlyincome
Variables Monthly income Mean
Standard
deviation F Sig.
Accept
Perceived
value
Under VND 3 million 3.8889 .94426
0.442 0.723
No
VND 3~7 million 3.9462 .94404
VND 7~15 million 3.7911 .87374
Over VND 15 million 3.7611 1.07713
47
Service
quality
Under VND 3 million 3.9524 .99882
0.769 0.513
No
VND 3~7 million 4.0269 .84187
VND 7~15 million 3.8089 .79114
Over VND 15 million 3.8917 .87180
Customer
satisfaction
Under VND 3 million 3.8730 .97181
0.266 0.850
No
VND 3~7 million 3.9480 .86902
VND 7~15 million 3.8281 .78191
Over VND 15 million 3.8333 .79449
Brand
reputation Under VND 3 million 3.9000 1.05057 0.334 0.801 No
VND 3~7 million 3.8710 .89596
VND 7~15 million 3.7440 .82760
Over VND 15 million 3.7900 .88746
Customer
loyalty
Under VND 3 million 3.9107 .99224 1.252 0.292 No
VND 3~7 million 4.0161 .81967
VND 7~15 million 3.7378 .79845
Over VND 15 million 3.8208 .92326
*F<3; Sig >0.05
As we can see the data from table 4.10, there was no significant difference in
respondent’s perceived value, service quality, brand reputation, customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty. F-value is smaller than 3 and Sig > 0.05, it mean that no variable is
different from others.
48
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
In this chapter, a summary and implication of findings are presented. Also some
limitations are also listed. After all, the chapter ends with recommendations for further
research and concluding statement.
5.1 Researchsummary
Internet banking services in Vietnam is more and more common even most
Vietnamese people prefer to use cash. The tendency of using Internet banking is among
young people who love convenient, flexible and time saving characteristics provided. Thus,
this study had contributed to exploring determinant factors and consequences of customer
satisfaction element in Vietnamese Internet banking sector.
Firstly, the findings of this study are sorted into three main parts which are the
analysis of demographic data, reliability test and hypotheses testing. It reveals the fact that
more slightly females using Internet banking than the males. In respect of age, most of
Internet banking users is young people from 15 to 35 years old. The mode monthly income
is from VND 3 million to 15 million. The highest participants of the survey has educated at
college level. Furthermore, major jobs of respondents are students, administrators or
managerial and stated-owned enterprises’ staff. Secondly, the Cronbach alpha test for
reliability stated that all variables exceeded Nunnally and Bernstein’s criteria of 0.7. These
analytics indicated that variable cases are highly reliable.
Secondly, hypothesis testing includes a test of four hypotheses using Regression
analysis. The four independent variables have a highly positive relationship with the
dependent one. Research findings showed that there is positive relationship between service
quality and customer satisfaction, perceived value and customer satisfaction, brand
reputation and customer satisfaction, as well as customer loyalty and customer satisfaction.
49
Furthermore, perceived value and service quality are elements which determining how
satisfied customers are. Internet banking services provides a number of advantageous
characteristics like convenience and flexibility, easy to use, and time saving. Customers can
log into Internet and use baking services as normal. They can immediately check account
balance; making transactions anywhere and anytime even at weekend. Customers do not
need to directly go banks. Also it is so easy to use with a laptop connected to Internet or a
digital device like smart phone, PDA and so on. Most of participants were educated at
college level, thus they can quickly adapt to high technology. Both service quality and
perceived value determines the level of customer satisfaction. Higher service quality
provided that met or exceed customer expectations would lead to a relatively high
satisfaction.
According to Pearson test, the brand reputation is the most important variable of
customer satisfaction. The more customers are satisfied or Internet banking services meet or
exceed the customers’ expectation, the more brand reputation is well known. Word of mouth
experiences are the fastest and the most effective way to advertise about a product’s or
service’s brand. People tend to believe one’s experience rather than an advertisement.
Therefore, customer satisfaction is critically affecting a brand’ awareness. The second rank
related to customer satisfaction is customer loyalty. As stated, the more customers are
satisfied, the more customers are loyal to banking services. It was a positively linear
relation.
5.2 TheoreticalandPracticalimplication
This study has critical implication for managers of various banks participated in the
survey; especially in Internet Banking service areas. Firstly, service quality and perceived
value is a predictor of customer satisfaction using Internet banking in Viet Nam. Under
customer’s perspective, they want services provided with outstanding quality and the
50
highest perceived value. They are satisfied if they are served equal or higher than what they
expect to. From a managerial perspective, Internet Banking providers in Vietnam need to
realize that providing good Internet Banking services alone does not guarantee customer
retention. Service quality is not the most important factor to differentiate competitive
offerings but it is an essential and necessary element to establish customer’s belief.
Customers do not believe only on advertising and others’ advise but they use their own
judgment on actual experience of Internet banking services. Hence, good service quality is a
must and is expected to be offered by each Internet Banking provider in the first place.
High perceived value is also a fundamental basis to accomplish customer satisfaction.
If ever trying a bad service with low perceived value, customers will not use the second
time and will switch to other rivals. A bank can improve it perceived value by increasing a
small percentage on interest rates for banking deposits, decreasing a small percentage on fee
charges. Buyers not only choose a bank with good services but a bank with good services
and cheaper administrative costs. Constructing an attractive marketing campaign is also a
good step to increase perceived value in customer’s mind. Banks can list benefits when
using Internet banking services like convenience, time saving and easiness to manage. A
strong guarantee and confidentiality is a plus to a bank. A bank ought to try the best to avoid
a false sense of Internet Banking value; focus on the unique value compared to other banks.
Consequently, it should be noted that service quality and perceived value are fundamental
attributes for retain customers. However for customer retention strategy, Internet Banking
providers in Vietnam should look for other factors that can help to create satisfaction in
order to sustain competitive advantage in long run. Besides, the high range of customer
satisfaction can establish a well-known brand reputation in the market. This is not
maintaining existing customers but also attract new groups and user segments. Banks can
utilize the factors to construct an ideal image in the banking sector, increase profitability of
Internet banking services, achieve higher returns and broaden market shares.
51
Secondly, the reputation of the Internet banking provider has a positive link with
Customer Satisfaction. In fact, reputation of Internet banking services is built basing on
customers’ actual experience and marketing campaigns. More and more marketing
campaigns and social event using brand name will widespread and construct customer’s
awareness of Internet banking services. Plus providing customers with actually high quality
and value with a wide awareness will lead to a good brand reputation. If actual experience is
outstanding and customers are satisfied, good reputation of Internet banking services is the
critical factor to retain and widen customers segment and market share. Brand reputations
play a key role due to the same service manner. If a company’s reputation is positive, then it
can be assumed that customers have a positive attitude towards the bank’s
services. Therefore, customer is not willing to switch to other banks. From a managerial
standpoint it is important to judge reputation as the most critical factor in encouraging
satisfaction among Vietnamese customers towards their Internet Banking services.
Reputation is vital for the survival of a bank in the long run, affect stock market
performance via profitability and have a direct effect on the stock markets. Customer
satisfaction therefore is a basis to achieve brand reputation. Or in other words, brand
reputation is one of benefit from customer satisfaction.
Thirdly, customer loyalty is one important element interacting with customer
satisfaction of Internet banking services. As described on chapter 2 (literature review),
customer satisfaction is a must to accomplish the goal of customer loyalty. The research
findings indicated a positive connection between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty.
Customers are satisfied with actual performance and actual experience of Internet Banking
services, they tend to reuse and introduce for their friends, family members and needed
people. It means that customer satisfaction do not only retain existing customer but broaden
new ones. From a managerial viewpoint, given values in relation with customer satisfaction
of Internet banking services, managers of banks can define customers’ needs and wants.
52
Then they can concentrate resources and build marketing campaign and management
strategies that achieve the highest level of customer satisfaction. These campaign should
start from what customers like and why they use our services rather other rivals. This can be
done by making survey with existing customers. Making phone calls, face to face or even
online surveys are used, however, this process should be done quarterly or yearly depending
on the entity’ dimensions and making sure to record honest opinions and keep update the
information. It is good and necessary to attract more customers but it is not at all. It costs
ten times more to attract a new consumer than keeping an existing one. Therefore, solving
common customer complaints and delivering outstanding customer services are essential in
order to increase sales and result in attracting new customers through the existing one’
recommendation. Besides, banks can occasionally set up social events; send thanks cards or
small gifts for special dates. Nowadays, customers prefer a company having a good
contribution to society. Banks should take part in sports event, charity, pupil scholarships,
and so on. It also brings a good image in customer mind about the banks. The higher level
of satisfaction, the more loyal customers are.
With the above findings, this study analytics also served academic purposes as an
empirical study in the internet banking in Vietnam, with the perspectives of customer
satisfaction, service quality and perceived value.
5.3 ResearchlimitationsandFutureResearch
Although the research is carefully analyzed, there are still some limitations. One main
limitation of the study is inadequate sample. The population of people using Internet
Banking is such a huge number. Therefore, this research sample as 205 participates is rather
small. Further study should extend the sample size with participants other than web-users
from certain geographic areas or companies.
53
In addition, instead of using customers of all the banks to clearly clarify the
determinants and consequences of customer satisfaction element in using Internet banking
services in Viet Nam, only few banks in big cities like Hanoi, Da Nang and Ho Chi Minh
were selected. The variety of participants was not able to be fully satisfied. This may have
an effect on the study’s findings. Plus, because questionnaires were distributed mainly
through Internet, most respondents are young people who have more chances in using
Internet than other groups.
The information collected may be biased since the respondents can exaggerate their
answer. Some people would feel annoying and impatient to finish a long numerous
quantities of questionnaires. Also, these questions were translated from English to
Vietnamese so there are occurrences of unclear translation and misunderstanding for
answers. These may lead to a limitation of the analysis results. The last limitation is time
and resource constraint. Time constraint affected the quality and quantity of research work.
This study will support business to identify the fundamental elements which have
high impacts on customer satisfaction. The positive relationship between variables such as
perceived value, service quality, brand reputation and customer loyalty with dependent
variable i.e. customer satisfaction, would be used as a basis to continue further studies about
these variables in Internet banking sector.
5.4 Concludingstatement
This study tempted to proving a positive linear relationship between determinant
factors like perceived value and service quality and customer satisfaction, and a consequent
relationship between customer satisfaction and variables, i.e. brand reputation and customer
loyalty. This is the primary purpose of this study. On the process of following WTO
regulations up to 2015, Vietnamese economy will attract more and more investing
54
businesses and more foreigners living in Vietnam. A huge flow in and out of money will be
an unimaginable prospect. This is an opportunity for all Vietnamese banks broadening their
range of business, especially Internet banking services. Therefore, satisfying customer needs
and wants will attain a prospective future.
55
REFERENCES
Abor, J. (2004). Technological Innovations and Banking in Ghana: An Evaluation of
Customers’ Perception. School of Administration. Legon, Ghana: University of
Ghana.
Ahmad, A., & Al-Zu'bi, H. (2011). E-banking functionality and outcome of customer
satisfaction: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Marketing Studies ,
3 (1).
Al-Kasasbeh, M., Dasgupta, S., & Al-Faouri, A. (2011). Factors affacting e-service
satisfaction. Communications of IBIMA , 12.
Alsamydai, M., Yousif, R., & Khasawneh, M. (2012). The factors influencing Consumers'
Satisfaction and Continuity to deal with E-Banking Services in Jordan. Global
Journal of Management and Business research , 12 (14), 129-142.
Al-Sukkar, A., & Hasan, H. (2004). Internet banking in the Middle East: A Jordanian study.
CISTM conference. Transforming business performance through knowledge
management. Alexandria, Egypt.
Anderson, E.W. (1994), Cross-Category Variation in Customer Satisfaction and Retention,
Marketing Letters, 5 (1), 19-30.
Berry, & Leonard, L. (1995). Service marketing is different. Business Horizons , 24-29.
Casalo, L.V., Flavian, C. and Guinaliu, M. (2008). The role of satisfaction and website
design usability in developing customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth in the
e-banking services, The Internactional Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(6), 399-417
Che-Ha and Hashim, (2007), Brand Equity, Customer Satisfaction & Loyalty: Malaysian
Banking Sector, International Review of Business Research Papers 3 (5) ,123-133
Cronin, J., & Taylor, S. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling
performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service
56
quality. The journal of Marketing , 58 (1), 125-131.
Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K., & Hult, G.T.M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and
customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments,
Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
Daniel, E. (1999), Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of
Ireland, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(2), 72 - 83.
De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. and Bloemer, J. (1998), On the relationship between perceived
service quality, service loyalty and switching costs, International Journal of Service
Industry Management, 9 (5), 436-53.
De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., Lemmink, J. and Mattson, J. (1997), The dynamics of the
service delivery process: a value-based approach, International Journal of Research
in Marketing, 4 (3), 231-43
Doan, P. (2013). E-banking, đường đua mới của ngân hàng Việt. Retrieved April 13, 2014,
from Vietnamnet Website:
http://vietnamnet.vn/vn/kinh-te/155200/e-banking--duong-dua-moi-cua-ngan-hang-vi
et.html
Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. and Grewal, D. (1991), Effects of price, brand, and store
information on buyers product evaluations, Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3),
307- 319.
Gan, C., Cohen, D., Clemes, M., & Chong, E. (2006). A survey of customer retention in the
NewZealand banking industry, Banks and Bank Systems, 1 (4)
Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online
custumers. The database for Advances Information systems , 33 (3), 38-53.
Gonroos, C. (2001). the perceived quality concept: a mistake? Managing Service Quality ,
11 (3), 150-152.
Goodwin-Jones, B. (2001). Emerging technologies - accessibility and web design why does
57
it matter? Language Learning and Technology , 5, 16-28.
Gronroos, C. (1984). Service Management and Maketing. Lexington, MA.: Lexington
Books.
Hamadi, C. (2010), “The impact of quality of online banking on customer commitment”,
Communications of the IBIMA, 1-8.
Hanif, M., Hafeez, S., & Riaz, A. (2010). Factors affecting customer satisfaction.
International Research Journal of Finance and Economics , 60.
Herbig, P. & Milewicz, J. (1993). The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand
success, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (3), 18-24.
Hill, N., Brierley, J., & MacDougall, R. (2003). How to measure customer satisfaction.
Gower Publishing.
Hinson, R., Mohammed, A., & & Mensah, R. (2006). Determinants of Ghanian bank service
quality in a universal banking dispensation. Banks and Bank systems , 1 (2), 69-81.
Homburg, C., Giering, A. (2001), Personal Characteristics as Moderators of the
Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty, Psychology and Marketing,
18 (1), 43-66.
Jagdish, N., Parvatiar, A., & Shainesh, G. (2008). Customer relationship management:
Emerging Concepts, Tools & Appli. Marketing. Emory University: McGraw-Hill
Professional.
Jillian, C., & Geoffrey, N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple
item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77, 203–220.
Kolsaker, A., & Payne, C. (2002). Engendering trust in e-commerce: A study of
gender-based concerns. Marketing Intelligence and Planning , 20 (4), 206-214.
Kordnaeij, A., Askaripoor, H., & Imani, M. &. (2013). The impact of E-banking service
quality dimensions on customers' satiisfaction and brand equity (Case study: Refah
Bank, Tehran). Business and management research , 2 (4) 200-216.
58
Kotler, P. and Gertner, D. (2002), “Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place
marketing and brand management perspective”, Brand Management, 9 (4-5), 249-61.
Kotler, P., Keller, K.L. (2006). Marketing management (12th Edition ed.). New Jersey:
Pearson Education Inc.
Kumbhar, V. (2011). Factors affecting the customer satisfaction in e-banking: Some
evidences form Indian banks. Management Research and Practice , 3 (4), 1-14.
Loiacono, E., Watson, R., & Goodhue, D. (2002). WebQUAL: A measure of website quality.
Proceedings of the AMA Winter Educators' Conference (pp. 432-8). Chicago, IL.:
American Maketing Association.
Maroofi F, Moradi Aliabadi B, Fakhri H and kolivand H. 2013. Effective Factors on CRM
Development, Asian Journal of Business Management 5(1): 52-59
Mojares, E. K. B. (2014). Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Among Internet Banking
Users of Philippine National Bank in Batangas City, Asia Pacific Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 41-48
Mokhtar, A.S., Abbas, K.A., Sapuan, S.M. &, Ahmad, M.M.H., (2005) Consumer's
acceptability estimation of cold preserved Malaysian freshwater patin. Am.J. Applied
Sci., 2: 985-988
Moore, G.C., and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an Instrument to Measure the
Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems
Research, (pp 192-222).
Na, W. B., Marshall, R., & Keller, K. L. (1999). Measuring brand power: Validating a
model for optimizing brand equity, The Journal of Product and Brand Management,
8(3), 170–184.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric theory, vol.2, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Nunnally, J.C. and Berstein, I.H. (1994), Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York
Nguyen, T., & Singh, M. (2004). Impact of Internet banking on customer satisfaction and
59
loyalty: A conceptual model. The fourth International Conference on Electronic
Business, Beijing.
Oliver, R. (1981), Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Process in Retail Settings,
Journal of Retailing, 57, 25-48
Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavior Perspective on the Consumer, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality
and its implications for future research. The Journal of marketing , 49 (4), 41-50.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image
Management, Journal of Marketing, 50, 135-145
Ranaweera, C., and Prabhu, J. (2003). The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching
barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting, International
Journal of Service Industry Management, 14 (4) , 374-395
Reynolds John, (2007), A Retrospective Data Examination Of Customer Loyalty In The E-
Banking Technology Services Industry: Strategies For New Successes, A Dissertation
Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of
Philosophy, Capella University.
Roig, J.C.F., Garcia, J.S., Tena, M.A.M., and Monzonis, J.L. (2006), Customer perceived
value in banking services, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24 (5), 266-283.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P, &Thornhill, A., (2009). Research Methods for business students.
5th Ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited
Schefter, P., & Reichheld, F. (2000). E-loyalty. Harvard Business Review , 78 (4), 105-114.
Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. and Gross, B.L. (1991a), “Why we buy what we buy: a theory of
consumption values”, Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-70
Standifird, S.S., Weinstein, M. and Meyer, A.D. (1999), ‘Establishing Reputation on the
Warsaw Stock Exchange: International Brokers as Legitimating Agents’, Academy of
60
Management Proceedings, Chicago, IL.
Stapleton, D.C., (2006), A Review of Disability Data for the Institutional Population,
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Demographics and
Statistics, Cornell University.
Sweeney, J.C. and Soutar, G. (2001), “Consumer perceived value: the development of
multiple item scale”, Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203-20.
Tuchila, R. (2000). Servicii bancare prin Internet. E-finance Romania, 3, (3), 23.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an
Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce , 2
(1), 31-46.
Woodruff, R. B., Cadotte, E. R., & Jenkins, R. L. (1983). Modeling consumer satisfaction
rocesses using experience-based norms. Journal of marketing research, 296-304.
Yoon, Eunsang, Hugh J. Guffey, and Valerie Kijewski (1993), The Effects of Information
and Company Reputation on Intentions to Buy a Business Service, Journal of
Business Research, 27, 215-228.
Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2000). A conceptual Framework for
Understanding e-service quality: Implications for future research and managerial
practice. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
61
APPENDIX A: Determinant Factors and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction in Vietnamese Internet Banking Sector
(QUESTIONNAIRES FOR DATA COLLECTION)
Part A: Background (Please tick ( or ) the response which is true about you).
1. Age:
15 – 25 26 – 35 36 – 45
46 – 55 56 – 65 66 and over
2. Gender:
Male Female
3. Monthly Income:
Under 3,000,000 VND 3,000,001~7,000,000 VND
7,000,001~15,000,000 VND Over 15,000,001 VND
Next Page
I am a graduate student of International Master of Business of Administration program, I-Shou
University, Taiwan. My master thesis is about “Determinant Factors and Consequences of
Customer Satisfaction in Vietnamese Internet Banking Sector”. Please take about 10 to 15
minutes to complete this questionnaire by ticking () your appropriate answer or giving your
own opinions on the following questions. The collected information will only be used for
academic purposes and will be strictly confidential. Thank you so much for your time and your
cooperation.
Best regard!
Supervisor: Dr. Heidi Chang
Student: Candy (Duong Phuong Linh)
Department of Master International Business Administration
I Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
E-mail: [email protected]
62
4. Level of education:
Less than High School High School
College Graduate
5. Job:
Professionals Administrative/Managerial
Laborers/Farmers Government/State Enterprise
Students Retired/ Unemployed/Housewife
Entrepreneurs Commercial
Others (Please indicate): ..........................................................................................................
Part B: Please read each item carefully and circle the appropriate number that
indicates HOW MUCH YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE with each of the sections
below:
Please tick ( or ) the response which is
closest about Internet Banking Sector, Vietnam
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
How satisfied you are with the Service Quality
1. Full information on product features and
services offered
2. Internet banking is clear and easy to use
3. Website information is regularly updated
4. Internet banking is convenience and saves time
5. The confidentiality of customer’s data is
ensured
6. Internet banking transactions are satisfactory
worked in term of security and privacy protection
63
How satisfied you are with the Perceived ValueStrongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree StronglyAgree
1 2 3 4 5
1. Internet banking gives me greater control over
my finances
2. Transaction fees are reasonable
3. Internet banking service is good value of
money
4. The use of Internet banking is relaxed
5. Internet banking is interesting to use
6. Using Internet banking for my banking
services increase my productivity
7. Using Internet banking improves my
performance of utilize banking service
8. Internet banking is compatible with my life and
working style
9. Internet banking offers a convenient
cross-linked transactions among banks
Rate your degree of Customer Satisfaction Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
1. Internet banking makes it easy to find what I
need
2. My expectation before using Internet banking
is met with my experience
3. Basing on my experience, Internet banking
application is quite pleasant
4. I am satisfied with Internet banking application
5. I am satisfied with the delivery of the overall
service of Internet banking
6. I am satisfied with quality and fee of Internet
banking service
7. I am satisfied with the first time installing and
using Internet banking
64
8. I am able to make transactions anywhere at any
time I want
9. Customer service of Internet banking system is
quick and highly satisfied
Assessment of customer satisfaction leads to
Brand Reputation
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
1. Internet banking has a good image in
customer’s mind
2. Internet banking has a good reputation
compared to traditional banking services
3. Banking websites has a good reputation for
offering wide range and high quality of banking
services
4. Banking websites have a good reputation on
secure customer’s confidential information
5. Internet banking has a good reputation on
specialists’ ability to detect fraud and information
theft
Assessment of customer satisfaction leads to
Customer Loyalty
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Agree
1 2 3 4 5
1. I commit in frequent use of Internet banking
service
2. I will use Internet banking service in the future
3. I will recommend friends and relatives using
Internet banking service
4. I will recommend Internet banking services to
someone who seeks my advice
5. I am eager to send feedback to improve future
supplied services
6. It is difficult to change my beliefs about
Internet banking
Thank you for filling the survey!
65
APPENDIX B: Những yếu tố quyết định và kết quả của sự hài
lòng khách hàng khi sử dụng Internet Banking tại Việt Nam
(CÂU HỎI ĐIỀU TRA DÙNG CHO THU THẬP DỮ LIỆU)
Xin chào bạn! Tôi là Đường Phương Linh. Hiện đang là sinh viên năm cuối khoa Quản trị Kinh Doanh
Quốc Tế tại Cao Hùng, Đài Loan. Bảng câu hỏi điều tra này được thiết kế để thu thập dữ liệu về các
nhân tố quyết định và kết quả của sự hài lòng của khách hàng khi sử dụng dịch vụ Internet banking tại
Việt Nam.
Rất mong sự tham gia của bạn để tôi có thể hoàn thành tốt Luận văn tốt nghiệp Thạc sỹ này!
Giáo viên hướng dẫn: Dr. Heidi Chang
Sinh viên: Candy (Duong Phuong Linh)
Khoa: Thạc sỹ Quản Trị Kinh Doanh Quốc Tế
Đại học Nghĩa Thủ, Cao Hùng, Đài Loan
E-mail: [email protected]
Phần A: Thông tin cá nhân (Các anh chị vui lòng chọn hoặc cho câu trả lời
đúng).
1. Độ tuổi:
15 – 25 26 – 35 36 – 45
46 – 55 56 – 65 Trên 66
2. Giới tính:
Nam Nữ
3. Thu nhập bình quân hàng tháng:
Dưới 3,000,000 VN 3,000,001~7,000,000 VND
7,000,001~15,000,000 VND Trên 15,000,001 VND
4. Trình độ văn hóa:
Chưa tốt nghiệp cấp 3 Cấp ba
Cao đẳng Đại học
5. Nghề nghiệp:
Chuyên viên Hành chính/ Quản lý
Nhà nông Công chức nhà nước
Sinh viên Nghỉ hưu/ Thất nghiệp/ Nội trợ
Chủ doanh nghiệp Thương mại
Ngành nghề khác (Vui lòng chỉ rõ)………………………………………… ……….
66
Phần B: Các anh chị vui lòng đọc kỹ và chọn câu trả lời đúng nhất về mức độ hài lòng
hoặc không hài lòng với mỗi phần dưới đây:
I. Anh chị có thỏa mãn với chất lượng dịch vụ hay
không?
Hoàn
toàn
không
đồng ý
Không
đồng
ý
Bình
thường
Đồng
ý
Hoàn
toàn
đồng ý
1 2 3 4 5
1. Cung cấp đầy đủ thông tin về tính năng sản phẩm và
dịch vụ được cung cấp
2. Dịch vụ Internet banking rõ ràng và dễ sử dụng
3. Thông tin trên trang web được cập nhật thường xuyên và
đầy đủ
4. Dịch vụ Internet banking rất thuận tiện và tiết kiệm thời
gian
5. Thông tin của khách hàng được bảo mật
6. Dịch vụ Internet banking làm hài lòng khách hàng về
bảo vệ an ninh mạng và sự riêng tư của khách
II. Anh chị có thỏa mãn với giá trị nhận thức Internet
banking đem lại cho anh chị?
Hoàn
toàn
không
đồng ý
Không
đồng ý
Bình
thường
Đồng
ý
Hoàn
toàn
đồng ý
1 2 3 4 5
1. Dịch vụ Internet banking giúp tôi kiểm soát tốt hơn tài
chính của mình
2. Phí giao dịch dịch vụ hợp lý
3. Dịch vụ Internet banking có giá trị cao
4. Sử dụng dịch vụ Internet banking rất thoải mái thuận tiện
5. Dịch vụ Internet banking rất thú vị khi sử dụng
6. Sử dụng dịch vụ Internet banking giúp tôi tăng hiệu quả
công việc
67
7. Sử dụng dịch vụ Internet banking giúp tôi cải thiện và tận
dụng triệt để các dịch vụ được cung cấp của ngân hàng
8. Dịch vụInternet banking thích hợp với cuộc sống và tác
phong công viêc của tôi
9. Hệ thống Internet banking cung cấp tiện ích các giao
dịch liên hệ thống các ngân hàng
III. Hãy đánh giá mức độ hài lòng của anh chị về dịch
vụ Internet Banking
Hoàn
toàn
không
đồng ý
Không
đồng ý
Bình
thường
Đồng
ý
Hoàn
toàn
đồng ý
1 2 3 4 5
1. Dịch vụ Internet banking giúp tôi dễ dàng tìm thấy
những gì tôi cần
2. Kinh nghiệm sử dụng dịch vụ Internet banking đáp ứng
được kì vọng của tôi trước khi sử dụng dịch vụ
3. Dựa trên kinh nghiệm bản thân, các ứng dụng của dịch
vụ Internet banking rất vừa ý tôi
4. Tôi rất thỏa mãn với các dịch vụ Internet banking
5. Tôi rất thỏa mãn với sự cung cấp đầy đủ dịch vụ của hệ
thống Internet banking
6. Tôi rất thỏa mãn với chất lượng dịch vụ và phí giao dịch
của hệ thống Internet Banking
7. Tôi rất thỏa mãn với lần đầu tiên cài đặt và sử dụng dịch
vụ Internet banking
8. Tôi có thể giao dịch bất kỳ đâu tại bất kỳ thời điểm tôi
mong muốn
9. Dịch vụ chăm sóc khách hàng của hệ thống Internet
banking rất nhanh chóng và đáp ứng đúng nhu cầu của tôi
68
IV. Đánh giá sức ảnh hưởng của việc thỏa mãn khách
hàng đến uy tín thương hiệu
Hoàn
toàn
không
đồng ý
Không
đồng ý
Bình
thường
Đồng
ý
Hoàn
toàn
đồng ý
1 2 3 4 5
1. Dịch vụ Internet banking đã xây dựng được một hình
ảnh tốt với nhận thức của khách
2. Dịch vụ Internet banking đã xây dựng được uy tín cao so
với các dịch vụ truyền thống khác của ngân hang
3. Trang web của ngân hàng xây dựng được uy tín cao
trong việc cung cấp đầy đủ các loại hình dịch vụ với chất
lượng cao
4. Trang web của ngân hàng xây dựng được uy tín cao
trong việc bảo vệ thông tin mật của khách hàng
5. Dịch vụ Internet banking xây dựng được uy tín cao về
khả năng phát hiện và xử lý gian lận và đánh cắp thông tin
của các chuyên gia
V. Đánh giá sức ảnh hưởng của việc thỏa mãn khách
hàng đến sự trung thành của khách hàng
Hoàn
toàn
không
đồng ý
Không
đồng ý
Bình
thường
Đồng
ý
Hoàn
toàn
đồng ý
1 2 3 4 5
1. Tôi cam kết sẽ sử dụng thường xuyên các dịch vụ
Internet banking
2. Tôi sẽ sử dụng các dịch vụ Internet banking trong tương
lai
3. Tôi sẽ giới thiệu cho bạn bè và người thân các dịch vụ
Internet banking
4. . Tôi sẽ giới thiệu các dịch vụ Internet banking cho bất kì
ai cần lời khuyên của tôi
5. Tôi rất mong được đóng góp ý kiến nhằm cải thiện các
dịch vụ được cung cấp trông tương lai
6. Thật khó để thay đổi niềm tin của tôi về dịch vụ Internet
banking
Xin chân thành cảm ơn sự giúp đỡ của các anh chị!