development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse.pdf

Upload: antonio-elvira-espinosa

Post on 03-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    1/19

    Agricultural Systems 43 (1993) 145-163

    D e v e l o p m e n t , C a l i b r a t i o n a n d V a l i d a t i o n o f a G r e e n h o u s eT o m a t o G r o w t h M o d e l : I . D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e M o d e l *

    E . D ayan, :~ H. van K eu len , b J . W . Jon e s , ~ I . Z ip or i , aD . S h m u e l & H . C h a l l a dB eso r E x p er im en ta l S t a t io n , A g r i cu l tu ra l R esea rch Organizat ion, Israelb D L O - C e n t r e o f A g r o b i ol o g ic a l R e s e a r c h ( C A B O - D L O ) , W ageningen, Th e Netherlands' A g r i cu ltu ra l E n g in ee rin g D ep ar tm e n t , U n iv e r s i ty o f F lo r id a , G a in esv i ll e , F lo r id a , U S Ad D e p ar tm en t o f H o r t i cu l tu re , W ag en in g en A g r i cu l tu ra l U n iv e r si ty , W ag en in g en, T h e

    Netherlands(Received 29 January 1992 ; accep ted 6 November 1992)

    A B S T R A C TA dynam ic crop grow th model , TO M G R O , fo r an inde termina te tomatovariety is pre sen ted The mo del describes the phenolog ical developm entand increase in dry weight of various organs (roots, stem nodes, leavesand fru i ts ) fro m plant ing t i ll m aturi ty under variable e nvironme ntal condi-t ions . Phenological development is governed by genet ic p lant propert iesand environme ntal condit ions (e .g . a ir temperature and C 02 level) and ex-pres sed in a p lastochron index, i .e . the current s tem node number. Tota ldry m atter accum ulat ion is based on a quant i ta t ive description o f the car-bon balance, including g ross C O 2 assimilation, m ainten anc e respirationand grow th respiration. Part i t ioning o f dry matte r increase over the vari-ous organ s is gov ern ed by their relative sin k strengh, defined on the basiso f a gene tically de term ine d "potential ' gro w th rate, ac hieved under non-l imiting carbohy drate supply. The m odel is both schem atic and modular inset-up. This means i t can be adap ted easily and mo st o f its subrout ines canbe replaced easily by oth ers i f bette r descriptions becom e available. It canalso be com bined with a more comprehensive m ode l describing greenhousec l imate and appears robus t fo r use in procedures o f economic op t imiza t iono f cl imate condi t ions in greenhouses o r fo r ma nage me nt purposes.

    * C o n t r ib u t io n f ro m th e A g r i cu l tu ra l R esea rch O rg an iza t io n , the Volcani Center , BetDagan , Is rael . No . 3422-E , 1991 series.:~ Presen t address : H ab so r Ex per im ental S ta t ion , M obi le Po st H aneg ev 4 , Is rael 85400.

    145Agricultural System s 0308-521X/93/ 06.00 1993 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, England.Printed in Great Britain

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    2/19

    146 E. Dayan et a l .

    I N T R O D U C T I O NI n c r e a s i n g i n t e r n a t i o n a l c o m p e t i t i o n p u t s i n c r e a s i n g p r e s s u r e o n t o m a t og r o w e r s t o r e d u c e th e c os t s o f p r o d u c t i o n b y , a m o n g o t h e r m o v e s ,e c o n o m i z i n g o n r e s o u r c e u s e . T o t h i s e n d , n e w g r o w i n g t e c h n i q u e sa r e r e q u i r e d , i n c l u d i n g u s e o f n e w v a r i e t i e s , c l i m a t e c o n t r o l , a n d e x -t e n s i o n o f t h e g r o w i n g p e r i o d . G r o w t h o f t o m a t o p l a n t s i n a g re e n -h o u s e i s a c o m p l e x p r o c e s s , g o v e r n e d b y t h e i n t e r a c t i o n s b e t w e e np l a n t g e n e t i c p r o p e r t i e s a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , a s m o d i f i e d b yc l i m a t e c o n t r o l i n s i d e t h e g r e e n h o u s e . I t i s t h e r e f o r e d i f f i c u l t t o p r e d i c ti n t u i t i v e l y , t h e m a n a g e m e n t m e a s u r e s n e c e s s a r y t o c r e a t e c r o p g r o w i n gc o n d i t i o n s t h a t w i l l l e a d t o o p t i m a l r e s o u r c e u s e ( C h a l l a & V o o r e n ,1980).D y n a m i c c r o p g r o w t h m o d e l s i n w h i c h i n s i g h t s i n p l a n t p h y s i o l o g i c a lp r o c e s s e s a n d t h e i r d e p e n d e n c e o n e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s a r e c o m -b i n e d ( W h i s l e r e t a l . , 1 9 8 6 ; S e l i g m a n , 1 99 0), m a y p r o v i d e a p r a c t i c a l a i di n m a n a g e m e n t d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g , s o t h a t t h e e f f e c t s o f a l t e r n a t i v e m a n -a g e m e n t s t r a t e g i e s c a n b e e x a m i n e d . I n t h i s p a p e r s u c h a m o d e l f o r at o m a t o c r o p , T O M G R O , is p r e s e n te d . I n th e fi rs t p a r t a d e s c ri p t i o n o ft h e m o d e l i s g i v e n , w h i l e i n p a r t I I ( D a y a n e t a l . , 1 9 9 3 fi el d c a l i b r a t i o na n d v a l i d a t io n a r e d es c r ib e d . C a l i b r a t i o n o f th e m o d e l u n d e r c o n t r o l l e dc o n d i t i o n s h a s b e e n t h e s u b j e c t o f a s e p a r a t e s t u d y ( J o n e s e t a l . ,1 98 9a , b ), w h i l e i ts a p p l i c a t i o n f o r e c o n o m i c o p t i m i z a t i o n o f g r e e n h o u s econ t ro l i s de sc r ibed e l sewhe re (Seg ine r & Sh ina , 1989) .T h e m o d e l w a s d e s ig n e d t o d e sc r ib e g r o w t h o f a n i n d e t e r m i n a t et o m a t o v a r i e t y u n d e r t h e s p e c i f i c c o n d i t i o n s o f g r e e n h o u s e c u l t i v a t i o n i nI s ra e l. T i m i n g , q u a n t i t y a n d q u a l i t y o f t o m a t o f r u i t y i e l d a r e a f fe c t e d b yc l i m a t e c o n d i t i o n s i n t h e g r e e n h o u s e , c o n t r o l l e d b y c o o l i n g , h e a t i n g a n dC O 2 e n r i c h m e n t . T h e m o d e l d e s c r i b e s t h e e f f e c t s o f t h e s e m a n a g e m e n tm e a s u r e s t h r o u g h t h e i r in f lu e n c e o n t o t a l d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n a n dd i s t r i b u t i o n .T h e e f fe c ts o f w a t e r o r n u t r i e n t d e f i c i e n c y a r e n o t t r e a t e d i n th e m o d e l ,a s n e a r - o p t i m u m l ev e ls o f n u t r i e n t a n d w a t e r s u p p ly a r e m a i n t a i n e du n d e r g r e e n h o u s e c o n d i t io n s . W e e d s a re s u p p o s e d n o t t o i n f lu e n c e c r o pp e r f o r m a n c e , a n d e ff ec ts o f p e s t s a n d d i s e as e s a r e t r e a t e d i n a r u d i m e n -t a r y w a y . U n d e r t h e i n t e n s i v e m a n a g e m e n t p r a c t i c e s c o m m o n i n g r e e n -h o u s e s , w e e d s , p e s t s a n d d i s e a s e s h a r d l y i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e g r o w t h o fc o m m e r c i a l c r o p s .A n i m p o r t a n t c r i t e r i o n i n m o d e l d e v e l o p m e n t w a s r o b u s t n e s s i n v i e wo f its a p p l ic a ti o n f o r e c o n o m i c o p t i m i z a ti o n o f g r e e n h o u s e m a n a g e m e n ta s p a r t o f a n o v e r a l l d e c i s i o n s u p p o r t s y s t em .

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    3/19

    Development of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 147

    M O D E L D E S C R I P T I O NT h e m o d e l d e sc ri b es g r o w t h o f th e t o m a t o c r o p q u a n t i ta t iv e l y , b o t h b yn u m b e r o f a n d d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n in th e v ar i o u s p la n t c o m p o n e n t s( r o o t s , s t e m n o d e s , l e a v e s a n d f r u i t s ) . O r g a n n u m b e r s a r e d e r i v e d f r o mt h e o r d e r a n d r a t e o f a p p e a r a n c e a g ei n g, d e a th a n d d i s a p p e a ra n c e . D r ym a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n i s d e r i v e d f r o m t h e c a n o p y c a r b o n b a l a n c e a n d t h ep a r t it i o n i n g o f d r y m a t t e r a m o n g p l a n t o r g a n s .

    T h e p l a n t d e s c r i b e d i n t h e m o d e l i s c o m p o s e d o f a s e r i e s o f s u c c e s s i v es y m p o d i a , t h e f i r s t s y m p o d i u m h a v i n g 7 - 1 5 n o d e s w i t h l e a v e s , f o l l o w e db y a t r u s s , t h e f o l l o w i n g s y m p o d i a 3 n o d e s w i t h l e a v e s p r e c e d i n g t h et r u s s . E a c h t r u s s c a r r i e s 5 - 1 2 f l o w e r s , r e s u l t i n g i n 3 - 1 2 f r u i t s ( P i c k e ne t a l . , 1 9 8 6 ; A t h e r t o n & H a r r i s , 1 98 6).T i m e s t e p o f t h e m o d e lT h e t i m e i n t e rv a l o f i n t e g r a t i o n o f th e m o d e l i s o n e d a y , i n a c c o r d a n c ew i t h t h e t i m e c o n s t a n t o f th e s y s t e m .H o w e v e r , s o m e o f t h e p r o c es s e s, l ik e a s s im i l a t io n a n d r e s p i r a ti o n r e a c tr a p i d l y t o v a r y i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s s u c h a s l i g h t i n t e n s i t y a n dC O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n . H e n c e , t h e s e r a t e s a r e c a l c u l a t e d i n a s o - c a l l e d ' f a s tl o o p ' , t h a t i s e x e c u t e d a t h o u r l y t i m e i n t e r v a l s d u r i n g d a y t i m e i n t e g r a t e dv a l u e s a r e t h e n u s e d t o u p d a t e t h e s t a t e v a r i a b l e s o n c e a d a yS t a t e v a r i a b l e s a n d a g e c l a s s e sT h e m o d e l c a l c u l a t e s t h e t i m e c o u r s e o f b o t h w e i g h t a n d n u m b e r o fa e r i a l p l a n t c o m p o n e n t s ( s t e m n o d e s , l e a v e s a n d f r u i t s ) , w h i l e r o o tg r o w t h i s o n l y t r e a t e d s u p e r f i c i a l l y . O n l y t h e m a i n s t e m i s c o n s i d e r e d , a ss i d e s h o o t s a r e s u p p o s e d t o b e r e m o v e d ( V o o r e n e t a l . , 1986) . Each o ft h e a e r i a l p l a n t c o m p o n e n t s i s s u b d i v i d e d t o ' u n i f o r m ' c l a s s e s ( c o h o r t s ) ,c o n s i s t i n g o f i n d i v i d u a l s o f , o n a v e r a g e , t h e s a m e p h y s i o l o g i c a l a g e .S o m e o f t h e c o h o r t s c a n b e i d e n t i f i e d w i t h s p e c i f i c m o r p h o l o g i c a l s t a g e si n t h e p l a n t ' s l if e c y cl e , l i k e fl o w e r b u d s , f l o w e r s a n d r i p e n e d f r u it s .E a c h c o h o r t o f e a c h c o m p o n e n t i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y t w o s t a te v a r i a b le s ,r e p r e s e n t i n g it s n u m b e r a n d i ts w e i g h t. L e a f c o h o r t s a r e f u r t h e r c h a r a c -t e r i z e d b y t h e i r g r e e n a r e a . T h e t o t a l c r o p i s t h u s r e p r e s e n t e d b y s e v e nc o h o r t s o f s t a t e v a r i a b l e s : n u m b e r o f l e a v e s , n u m b e r o f s t e m n o d e s ,n u m b e r o f f r u i t s , d r y w e i g h t o f l e a v e s , d r y w e i g h t o f s t e m n o d e s , d r yw e i g h t o f fr u it s a n d a r e a o f l ea v e s ( F ig . 1). T h e g r o w t h a n d d e v e l o p m e n to f e a c h o f th e s e p l a n t c o m p o n e n t s a r e d e s c r i b e d a s c o h o r t c h a n g e s , i .e .

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    4/19

    PnDs

    PnDf

    l

    PnDI

    STEM

    LEAVES

    WEGH

    NMB

    WEGH

    NMB

    I

    IFRUIT

    WEGH

    NMB

    o

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    5/19

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    6/19

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    7/19

    Development of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 151

    F o r m a t u r e l e a v es , su s c e p ti b le t o l e a f s h e d d i n g d u e t o s h a d i n g :r d l( N ) = r d r ( N ) . Q ( N ) + r d r s . ( L a - L a x ) L a > L a x

    w h e r erdr ( i )

    r d r sL a

    L a x

    E a c h

    (6)= re la t ive d ea th ra te o f l e aves in age c la s s / (day ~), fo rc in g

    f u n c t i o n ;= m a x i m u m r e l a t i v e d e a t h r a t e d u e t o s h a d i n g ( d a y 1 ) ;= l e a f a r e i n d e x o f t h e c a n o p y ; a n d= c r i t ic a l l e a f a r e a i n d e x , a b o v e w h i c h l e a v e s d ie b e c a u s e o fs h a d i n g .t r u s s c o n s i s t s o f s e v e r a l f l o w e r s , i n w h i c h s e v e r a l f r u i t s a r es e t a n d d e v e l o p . T h e n u m b e r o f fl o w e r s i n i t i a te d p e r n o d e is a v a r ie t a l

    c h a r a c t e r i s t i c , m o d i f i e d b y p h y s i o l o g i c a l a g e o f t h e p l a n t ( V r i e s e n g a &H o n m a , 1 97 4) a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s ; fo r e x a m p l e , l o w t e m p e r -a t u r e s r e s u l t i n s p l it t i n g o f th e t r u s s a n d i n i t i a t i o n o f m o r e f r u i t s p e rt r u s s ( C a l v e r t , 1 9 5 9 ; H u r d & C o o p e r , 1 9 6 7 ) .T h e d e g r e e o f sp l i tt in g a n d h e n c e t h e n u m b e r o f f ru i ts p e r t r u s s i sa s s u m e d t o b e p o s i t iv e l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t im e o f e x p o s u r e t o l o w e r t h a nc r it ic a l t e m p e r a t u r e s . H e n c e , t h e r a t e o f f r u it f o r m a t i o n , r F , i s g iven by:

    r F = r M . F t . c s . f t l (7)f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f p l a s t o c h r o n i n d e x o n t h en u m b e r o f fr u it s p e r t r u ss ;

    c s = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f fe ct o f lo w t e m p e r a t u r e s o n t r u ssspl i t t ing; andf t l = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f s u b - o p t i m u m t e m p e r a t u r e s o n

    frui t se t .B o t h h i g h a n d l o w t e m p e r a t u r e s r e d u c e f r u i t s e t ( L e v y et al . , 1978;

    R y l s k i , 1 9 7 9 ; S a w h n e y , 1 9 8 3 ; P i c k e n , 1 98 4). H e n c e , i n t h e m o d e l , t h e r a t eo f f r u i t i n i t i a t i o n i s n e g a t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e p e r i o do f e x p o s u r e t o a b o v e - o r b e l o w - c r i t ic a l t e m p e r a t u r e s .A f t e r s e t t i n g , t h e y o u n g f r u i t s a r e s t i l l s e n s i t i v e t o s u b - o p t i m a l c o n d i -t i o n s a n d s o m e m a y b e a b o r t e d ( R u s s e ll & M o r r i s , 1 9 8 2 ; A t h e r t o n &O t h m a n , 1 98 3). T h e n u m b e r o f a b o r t e d y o u n g f ru i ts is c a l c u l a t e d as af u n c t i o n o f s i n k / s o u r c e r a t i o ( C a l v e r t & S l a c k , 1 9 7 5 ) , w h i c h w i l l b e d i s -c u s s e d l at e r. H e n c e , t h e r a t e o f f r u it a b o r t i o n , R a , is given as:

    R a = r r a . F ( l ) (8)w h e r e r r a = r e l a t i v e r a t e o f f r u i t a b o r t i o n ( d a y ~ ) , a n d F ( / ) = y o u n g f r u i t sn u m b e r .A l l m a t u r e f r u i t s a r e p i c k e d a n d r e m o v e d f r o m t h e s y s t e m .

    w h e r eF t =

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    8/19

    152 E. Dayan et al.

    Dry matter productionC a l c u l a t i o n o f b i o m a s s a c c u m u l a t i o n o f th e c r o p i s b a s e d o n a q u a n -t it a ti v e d e s c r ip t i o n o f th e c a r b o n b a l a n ce , c o m p r i s i n g g r o ss c a r b o n a s-s i m i l a t i o n , m a i n t e n a n c e r e s p i r a t i o n a n d g r o w t h r e s p i r a t i o n . G r o s s a s s i m i -l a t i o n , a s w e l l a s m a i n t e n a n c e a n d g r o w t h r e s p i r a t i o n a r e d e t e r m i n e d b yt h e i n s t a n t a n e o u s ly v a r ia b le c o m b i n a t i o n o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i-t io n s t e m p e r a t u r e , r a d i a t i o n a n d C O 2 le ve l a n d t h e m o r p h o l o g y , siz e a n dp h y s i o l o g ic a l a g e o f e a c h p l a n t c o m p o n e n t ( H u r d & T h o r n l e y , 1 97 4). A se n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s i n s i d e t h e g r e e n h o u s e v a r y o v e r s h o r t p e r i o d so f ti m e , a s s i m i l a t io n a n d r e s p i r a t i o n a r e c a l c u l a t e d w i t h h o u r l y t i m es t e p s , i n t h e ' f a s t l o o p ' .

    D a i ly g r o s s as s i m i l at i o n is o b t a i n e d b y i n t e g r a t i o n o f in s t a n t a n e o u sa s s i m i l a t i o n r a t e s , c a l c u l a t e d a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e p r e v a i l i n g l e v e l s o fP A R ( p h o t o s y n t h e t i c a ll y a c ti v e r a d i a t io n ) a n d C O 2 , a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r ea n d c r o p c h a r a c t e ri s t ic s s u c h a s l e a f a re a i n d e x , l e a f a n g l e d i s t r i b u t i o n ,l ig h t e x t i n c t i o n c o e f fi ci en t , e tc . C a l c u l a t i o n o f i n s t a n t a n e o u s g r o s s a s s im i -l a t i on r a t e , P g , i s b a s e d o n A c o c k ' s e q u a t i o n ( A c o c k et a l . , 1978).

    P g = ( D . P m /K ) . ln [ (1 - m ) . P m + Q e . K . R m ] /[(1 - m ) . P m + Q e . K . R m . e x p ( - K . L a ) ] . T a (9)D -- c o n v e r s i o n f a c t o r f r o m / z m o l C O 2 m 2 s J t o g C O 2 m 2 d a y ~;K -- c a n o p y l ig h t e x t i n c t i o n c o e f fi c ie n t f o r P A R ;m = l e a f l i g h t t r a n s m i s s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t ;

    P m = l i g h t s a t u r a t e d l e a f C O 2 a s s i m i l a t i o n r a t e 0 z m o l C O 2 m 2 s ~);Q e = l e a f q u a n t u m e ff ic ie n cy (/ zm o l C O 2 / ~ m o l -l p h o t o n s ) ;

    R m = p h o t o s y n t h e t i c p h o t o n f lu x d e n s i t y 0 z m o l p h o t o n s m -2 s -l);L a = a c t iv e c a n o p y l e a f a r e a i n d e x ( m 2 l e a f m 2 s u r fa c e ); a n dT a = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e ff ec t o f a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e o n g r o ss

    a s s i m i l a t i o n .T h e v a l u e o f P m i s d e t e r m i n e d b y p h y s i o l o g i c a l c r o p a g e , a m b i e n t t e m -p e r a tu r e a n d a m b i e n t C O2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( T h o r n l e y et a l . , 1981):

    P m = P m c . f t p . f p i (10)w h e r e

    P m c = l ig h t s a t u r a t e d l e a f C O 2 a s s i m i l a t i o n r a t e , a s a f u n c t i o n o fa m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n (p , m o l C O 2 m 2 S 1 ;f t p -- f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r th e e ff ec t o f a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e o n l ig h t -s a t u r a t e d l e a f C O 2 a s s im i l a t io n r a t e; a n df p i = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e ff ec t o f l e a f a g e o n l i g h t - s a t u r a t e dl e a f C O ~ a s s i m u l a t i o n r a t e .

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    9/19

    Development o f a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 153T h e v a lu e o f P m c is c a l c u l at e d f r o m a m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t io n :

    P m c = t l . C a + m a x [ O . , t 2 . ( C a - 350)] (11)w h e r eC a = am b i en t C O2 co n c en t r a t i o n ( p ~m o l t o o l 1 ):t l , t 2 = em p i r i c a l co n s t an t s ; an dm a x = t a k e s t h e m a x i m u m v a l u e o f t h e a r g u m e n t s in b r a c k e ts .

    D a i l y m a i n t e n a n c e r e sp i r a ti o n is a ls o o b t a i n e d b y i n t e g r a t i o n o f t h e i n-s t an t an eo u s r a t e s , c a l cu l a t ed t o ( P en n i n g d e Vr i e s, 1 97 5):r m r - - ( W t v . r r v + W t f r r f ) . T mw h e r e

    rmrW t v =

    (12)d a i ly t o t a l m a i n t e n a n c e r e s p i ra t i o n ( k g CH20 m 2 day-~);t o ta l d r y w e i g h t o f l iv i n g a b o v e g r o u n d v e g e t a ti v e p l a n t o r g a n s ,co m p r i s i n g l e av es, p e t io l e s an d s t em n o d es ( k g m - 2);

    r r v = m a i n t en an ce r e s p i r a t i o n co e f fi c ien t o f v eg e t a t i v e p l an t m a t e r i a l(kg CH20 k g -1 (dry mat ter ) day ~) ;W t f - - to ta l d ry weigh t o f f ru i t on the c rop (kg m 2) ;

    r r f = m ain ten anc e resp i r a t ion coef fi c ien t o f f ru i t m ate r i a l (kg CH 20 kg I( d r y m a t t e r ) d ay l ) ; an dT m -- f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e ef fe c t o f t e m p e r a t u r e o n m a i n t e n a n c er e s p i ra t i o n ( G o s i e w s k i e t a l . , 1982).Gr o wt h r e s p i r a t i o n i s a s s o c i a t ed w i t h t h e co n v e r s i o n o f p r i m ar y p h o t o -s y n t h a t e s i n t o s t ru c t u r a l d r y m a t t e r ( P e n n i n g d e V r ie s e t a l . , 1983).

    r g = c p . ( P g - r m r ) (13)w h e r er g = r a te o f g r o w t h r e s p ir a t io n ( k g CH20 m 2 da y ~); an dc p = c a r b o n p r o d u c t i o n v a l u e ( k g d r y m a t t e r k g 1 (CH20)).

    T o t a l a s s i m i l a t e ( ex p r e s s ed i n t e r m s o f d r y m a t t e r ) av a i l ab l e f o rg r o wt h o f s t r u c t u r a l p l an t m a t e r i a l , P n , i s thu s g iven by :P n = P g - r m r - r g (14)

    A s s i m i l a t e d i s t r i b u t i o nP a r t i t io n i n g o f d r y w e i g h t i n c re a s e a m o n g p l a n t o r g a n s c a n b e d e s c r i b e db y t h e i r r e la t iv e s in k s t r e n g t h s ( H u r d & T h o r n l e y , 1 9 7 4 ; T a n a k a e t a l . ,1 9 7 4 a , b ; H u r d e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ; T h o r n l e y e t a l . , 198 1; S ta rck , 1983). In themodel , f i r s t a f r ac t ion , f r t , o f t h e av a i l ab l e a s s i m i l a t e s , d e f i n ed a s af u n c t i o n o f t h e p h y s i o l o g ic a l a g e o f t h e p l a n t ( p l a s to c h r o n ) , m o d i f i e d by

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    10/19

    154 E. Dayan et al.

    t e m p e r a t u r e a n d t h e s o u r c e / s i n k r a t i o , i s p a r t i t i o n e d t o g r o w t h o f t h er o o t s y s t e m ( N o u r a i , 1 9 8 0 ; R u s s e l l & M o r r i s 1 98 3).T h e t o t a l s i n k s t r e n g t h o f le a v e s a n d f r u it s is c a l c u l a t e d b y a d d i n g t h e

    s i n k s t r e n g t h s o f t h e v a r i o u s c o h o r t s , w h i c h i s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e n u m b e ro f o r g a n s i n th e c o h o r t a n d t h e g e n e t i c al l y d e t e r m i n e d ' p o t e n t i a l g r o w t hr a t e ' p e r i n d i v i d u a l, i.e. i ts g r o w t h r a t e u n d e r n o n - l i m i t i n g c a r b o h y d r a t esupp ly (Miha i lov , 1975) .T h e a c t u a l s i n k s t r e n g t h s o f t h e f r u i t s , D f , i s o b t a i n e d a s t h e s u m o ft h e s i n k s t r e n g t h s o f a l l f r u i t c o h o r t s , c a l c u l a t e d i n d e p e n d e n c e o f t h en u m b e r o f f ru i ts i n t h e c o h o r t a n d t h e p o t e n t i a l g r o w t h r a t e p e r in -

    d i v i d u a l ( W a l k e r & H o , 1 9 7 7 : H o et al., 1983) , modi f ied by the e f fec t s o fa m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e a n d C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( F i s h e r, 1 9 7 7 ; H o , 1 98 0):S

    D f = ~ , ( N f ( i ) . P f ( i ) . T f f C ) (15)t=lw h e r e :

    Nf l i ) - - number o f f ru i t s in age c la s s i ;Pfl i ) = m a x i m u m r a te o f d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n p e r f r u it i n a g ec lass i (g f ru i t 1 da y l );

    T f = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f t e m p e r a t u r e o n p o t e n t i a lf r u i t d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n r a t e ; a n df C = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f a m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o no n p o t e n t i a l f r u i t d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n r a t e ( s e e e q n ( 1 9 ) ) .

    F o r l e a f b l a d es , p o t e n t i a l d r y m a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n r a t e is a s s u m e d t ob e c o n t r o l l e d b y p o t e n t i a l l e a f a r e a e x p a n s i o n r a t e in e a c h c o h o r t , rLA( i )(Hu ssey , 1963a, b 1965; C oo pe r , 1966 , 1967 ; K lap w i jk , 1981), de f ined a s :w h e r e rL A( i) = N l(i) . Pl( i). Tl . fc (16)

    Nl( i ) = n u m b e r o f g r o w i n g l e a v e s i n a g e c la s s i ( m 2);Pl(i) -- m a x i m u m r a t e o f l e a f a r e a e x p a n s i o n o f a n i n d i v i d u a l l e a f i n

    a g e cl as s i a t o p t i m u m t e m p e r a t u r e a n d 3 5 0 / z m o l m o l ~ C O 2c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( m 2 l e a f ~ d a y J)Tl = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e ef fe ct o f a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e o n l e a fa r e a e x p a n s i o n r a t e ; a n df c - - f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f a m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o no n l e a f a r e a e x p a n s i o n r a te .

    D r y m a t t e r d e m a n d o n e a c h l e a f a g e cl as s ( 's i n k s t r e n g t h ' ) i s d e r i v e df r o m i ts p o t e n t i a l e x p a n s i o n r a te , t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n t i ts s p ec if ic l e a f a r e a :rDp(i) = rL A ( i) /Ls(i) (17)

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    11/19

    Development of a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 155

    w h e r e rDp( i ) = po ten t ia l r a te o f inc rea se in d ry we igh t o f l eaves in age c las si (kg m 2 day- l ) ; and Ls( i ) - spec if ic lea f a rea o f leaves in age c lass i(m 2 g -l).S p e c if ic l e a f a r e a f o r e a c h l e a f c o h o r t is d e f in e d a s a f u n c t i o n o f a m b i -

    e n t t e m p e r a t u r e a n d C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n a n d t h e p r e v a i l i n g p h o t o n f l u xd e n s i t y ( H u r d & T h o r n l e y , 1 9 7 4 ; C h a r l e s - E d w a r d s & L u d w i g , 1 9 7 5 ) :L s ( i) = L s s . f C . T s l . f R (18)w h e r e

    L s s -- ' s t a n d a r d ' s p ec if ic l e a f a r e a ( m 2 g ~ ) ;f C = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f a m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o non spec i fic l e a f a rea ;T s = f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e f f e c t o f a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e o n

    spec i f ic l e a f a rea ; andf R -- f a c t o r a c c o u n t i n g f o r t h e e ff ec t o f p h o t o s y n t h e t i c p h o t o n f lu xd e n s i t y o n s p ec if ic l e a f a r e a .

    T h e e f f ec t o f a m b i e n t C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n o n s p ec if ic l e a f a r e a is d e f i n e da s a li n e a rl y i n c r e a si n g f u n c t i o n o f CO 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( G o u d r i a a n & d eRui te r , 1983) :f C = 1/(1 + B c ( C a - 350)) (19)

    w h e r e B c -- c h a n g e i n s p e ci fi c l e a f a r e a p e r / z m o l m o l -~ c h a n g e i n a m b i -en t CO2.T e m p e r a t u r e h a s a d i f fe r e n ti a l e ff ec t o n l e a f a r e a e x p a n s i o n a n d d r ym a t t e r p r o d u c t i o n , i . e . l e a f t h i c k n e s s d e c r e a s e s w i t h i n c r e a s i n g t e m p e r a -t u r e s ( F r i e n d , 1 9 6 6 ; H u r d & T h o r n l e y , 1 9 7 4 ) :

    f T = 1 /(1 + B T ( 2 4 - T )) (2 0)w h e r e B T = c h a n g e i n s p ec if ic l e a f a r e a p e r C c h a n g e i n t e m p e r a t u r e( H u r d & T h o r n l e y , 1 9 7 4 ) ; a n d T = a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e ( C ) .

    T h e r e f e r e n c e t e m p e r a t u r e o f 2 4 C w a s c h o s e n r a t h e r a r b i t ra r i l y , b a s e do n t h e r e s u lt s o f c o n t r o l l e d c o n d i t i o n e x p e r i m e n t s ( Jo n e s et a l . , 1989b).B e c a u s e o f th e r e l a ti v e i n d e p e n d e n c e o f le a f a r e a d e v e l o p m e n t a n d l e a fw e i g h t i n c r e a s e , h i g h e r a s s i m i l a t i o n r a t e s , i n d u c e d b y i n c r e a s e d p h o t o nf lu x d e n s i t y , le a d t o t h i c k e r l e a v e s ( C o o p e r , 1 96 6, 1 9 6 7 ; T h o r n l e y &H u r d , 1 97 4; K l a p w i j k , 1 98 1). I n t h e m o d e l a m o d i f i e d v e r s i o n o f a ne m p i r i c a l e q u a t i o n d e v e l o p e d b y B o o t e a n d c o - w o r k e r s ( K . J . B o o t e , J .W . J o n e s & G . H o g e n b o o m , u n p u b l i s h e d d a t a ) i s u s e d :

    f R = L s m + ( L s x - L s m ) . e x p ( - 0 . 4 1 7 . R m ) (2 1)w h e r e L s m , L s x = m i n i m u m a n d m a x i m u m v a l u e s o f sp e ci fi c l e a f a r e a ,r e spec t ive ly (g m-2) ; and R m = p h o t o s y n t h e t i c p h o t o n f l u x d e n s i t y ( / x m o lp h o to n s m -2 s ~).

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    12/19

    156 E . D a y a n et al.

    T o t a l d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d f o r le a f g r o w t h , DI, i s o b t a i n e d b y a d d i n gt h e d e m a n d s o f all a ge cl as se s, a n d t a k i n g i n to a c c o u n t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t sf o r g r o w t h o f t h e p e t io l e s , t h a t a r e a s s u m e d t o b e p a r t o f th e l e a f b l ad e s :

    ND l = (1 + p f ) ~ ( r D p (i )) (22)Ix lw h e r e p f -- f r a c t i o n o f p e t i o l e i n t o t a l l e a f b l a d e w e i g h t .

    T o t a l d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d o f t h e g r o w i n g s t e m n o d e s i s d e r i v e d f r o mt h e d e m a n d o f t h e l ea v es b y a s s u m i n g a f ix ed r a ti o b e t w e e n l e a f a n d s t emn o d e s i n k s t r e n g t h ( H e u v e l i n k & M a r c e l is , 1 98 9):

    Ds = ~ , , ( rDs( i ) ) (23)t=I

    rOs( i ) = rDp( i ) . Ns( i)/N l( i).fs" (24)w h e r e

    D s = t o t a l d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d f o r st e m g r o w t h ( k g m 2 d a y i);rDs( i ) - - d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d f o r s t e m g r o w t h i n a g e c l a s s i ( k g p l a n t

    day ~);N s (i ) -- n u m b e r o f g r o w i n g s t e m n o d e s i n a g e c la s s i; a n df s ~ = r a ti o o f d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d o f l e af b l a d e a n d s t em n o d e .

    T o t a l d r y m a t t e r d e m a n d f o r g r o w t h o f th e a e ri al p l a n t p a r t s i s t h es u m o f th e d e m a n d s o f th e c o m p o n e n t s :

    T D = D l + D s + D f (25)T h e a c t u a l g r o w t h r a te s o f a ll c o h o r t s o f le a v es ( p l u s p et io l e s) , s t e m

    n o d e s a n d f r u it s ar e d e r i v e d f r o m t h e p o t e n t i a l r a t e b y m u l t i p l y i n g w i t ht h e r a t i o P n / T D , i . e . t h e s u p p l y / d e m a n d r a t i o .

    R ( p ) = P ( p ) . P n / T D (26)w h e r e R ( p ) = a c t u a l g r o w t h r a t e o f e a c h c o h o r t o f o r g a n s ( k g m 2 d a y 1);a n d P ( p ) -- p o t e n t i a l g r o w t h r a te o f e a c h c o h o r t o f o r g a n s ( k g m 2 d ay -~ ).

    I f n e t a s s i m i l a t io n e x c e e d s t o t a l c r o p d e m a n d f o r a s s im i l a te s , a s s im i l a -t i o n i s i n s t a n t a n e o u s l y a d j u s t e d t o s a t i s f y d e m a n d e x a c t l y , i . e . s u r p l u sa s s i m i l a t e s a r e n o t s t o r e d i n a r e s e r v e p o o l f o r l a t e r u s e ( W a l k e r & H o ,1 9 7 7 ; W a l k e r et al . , 1 9 7 8 ; G o s i e w s k i et al . , 1981).

    D I S C U S S I O NT h e p r e s e n t m o d e l i s b a s e d o n t h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t a s s i m i l a t e a v a i l a b i l i t yis t h e m a j o r c o n s t r a i n t f o r g r o w t h a n d y i el d o f g r e e n h o u s e t o m a t o c r o p s .

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    13/19

    Developmen t o f a greenhouse tomato g row th model." I 157

    F o r m a n y s i tu a t i o n s i n t h e t e m p e r a t e z o n e a l in e a r r e l a ti o n b e t w e e n l ig h ti n t e r c e p t i o n a n d d r y m a t t e r p r o d u c t i o n h a s b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d ( M o n t e i t h ,1 9 7 7 ; Wa l k e r e t a l . , 1 9 7 8 ; Go s i ews k i e t a l . , 1981; K eu len & S to l , 1991).U n d e r w i n t e r c o n d i t i o n s i n I s r a e l i g r e e n h o u s e s t h i s p h e n o m e n o n w a sa l s o o b s e r v e d ( D a y a n e t a l . , 1 9 8 6 ) . T h e r e f o r e , i n t h e p r e s en t m o d e ll i m i t ed a s s i m i l a t e av a i l ab i l i t y i s a s s u m ed , an d h en ce a s t r o n g i n t e r n a lc o m p e t i t i o n f o r a s s i m i l a t e s b e t w e e n v e g e t a t i v e a n d r e p r o d u c t i v e p l a n to r g a n s a n d n o a c c u m u l a t i o n o f r e s e r v e c a r b o h y d r a t e s .T h e m o d e l d e s c r i b e d h e r e i s v e r y s i m i l a r t o o t h e r s i n c a l c u l a t i n g d r ym a t t e r a c c u m u l a t i o n i n t h e c r o p f r o m a q u a n t i ta t i v e d e s c r i p ti o n o f t h eca r b o n b a l an ce , i .e . g r o s s p h o t o s y n t h e s i s m i n u s l o s se s t h r o u g h r e s p i r a -t i o n f o r g r o w t h a n d m a i n t e n a n c e . T h e p r i n c ip l e o f d r y m a t t e r p a r t i ti o n -i n g a m o n g t h e v a r i o u s p l a n t o r g a n s , b a s e d o n a s o u r c e / s i n k a p p r o a c h i sa l s o s i m i l a r t o s o m e o t h e r m o d e l s ( D a y a n e t a l . , 1981; Keulen & Se l ig -m an , 1 9 8 7 ; M ar ce l i s e t a l . , 1 98 9). I n m o d e l s f o r d e t e r m i n a t e c ro p s , t h ev a r i ab l e s i n k / s o u r ce r e l a t i o n s a r e o f t en d e s c r i b ed i n t e r m s o f f i x ed d ev e l -o p m e n t s t a g e s ( J o n e s e t aL ,1984; Keulen & Se l igman , 1987) and par t i -t i o n i n g i s d i r ec t ly r e l a t ed t o t h e s e d ev e l o p m en t s t ag es b y em p i r i c a lf u n c t i o n s ( M ar ce l i s e t a l . , 1989; Spi t ters e t a l . , 1 9 8 9 ) . I n i n d e t e r m i n a t ec r o p s , b e c a u s e g r o w t h o f v e g e t a t i v e a n d r e p r o d u c t i v e o r g a n s p r o c e e d ss i m u l t a n e o u s l y a n d c o n t i n u o u s l y , t h e p l a n t ' s l if e cy c le d o e s n o t h a v e af ix e d l e n g th . T h i s m e a n s t h a t d e v e l o p m e n t h a s t o b e r e l a t e d t o t h e l if ec y -c le o f t h e c o m p o n e n t o r g a n s. T h e r e f o r e , in t h e m o d e l p r e s e n t e d h e re , t h ep h y s i o l o g i ca l ag e o f t h e c r o p a s a wh o l e i s d e s c r i b ed i n t e r m s o f t h e l i f e -cy c l e o f t h e v a r i o u s o r g an s , s t em n o d es , l e av es an d f r u i t s . T h e p h y s i o -l o g i c a l a g e o f e a c h o f t h e o r g a n p o p u l a t i o n s p r e s e n t a t a n y m o m e n t , i sd e f i n ed b y i ts n u m b e r an d t h e p h y s i o l o g i ca l ag e o f i ts i n d i v i d u a l s .T h e p h y s i o l o g ic a l a g e o f e a c h i n d i v i d u a l is d e s c r ib e d b y t h e i n t e g r a t e da n d i n t er a c t iv e e ff ec ts o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , t e m p e r a t u r e , l ig h tan d C O2 co n cen t r a t i o n s i n ce i t s ap p ea r an ce . B as i ca l l y , t h i s d e s c r i p t i o ni s s i m i l a r t o t h e o n e u s i n g a c c u m u l a t e d h e a t s u m , a s i n o t h e r m o d e l s ,e x c e p t t h a t t h e h e a t s u m b e t w e e n i n it i a ti o n a n d p h y s i o l o g ic a l m a t u r i t y ism o d i f i e d b y r a d i a t i o n l ev e l a n d C O 2 c o n c e n t r a t i o n , c o n d i t i o n s t h a t c a ng e n e r a ll y b e c o n t r o l l e d u n d e r g r e e n h o u s e c o n d i t io n s .D e f i n i n g si n k s t re n g t h o n t h e b a s is o f n u m b e r a n d p h y s i o l o g i c a l a g e o ft h e v a r i o u s o r g an s r e s u l t s i n v a r i ab l e s i n k s t r en g t h , b o t h t o t a l an d f o r t h ed i f f e r en t o r g an s , i n t h e co u r s e o f t h e p l an t ' s g r o wt h cy c l e , wh i ch i s i na c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e o b s e r v e d p a t t e r n o f g r o w t h o f v e g e t a ti v e a n d r e p r o -d u c t i v e p l an t o r g an s .U s e o f a d y n a m i c s u p p l y / d e m a n d r a t io t o g o v e r n d r y m a t t e r p a r ti ti o n -i n g , r a t h e r t h an p h y s i o l o g i ca l ag e o n l y , l e ad s t o v a r i ab l e p a r t i t i o n i n gp a t t e r n s i n t h e co u r s e o f t h e p l an t ' s g r o wt h cy c l e , M o r eo v e r , i t a f f ec t s

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    14/19

    158 E. Dayan et al.i n i t ia t i o n a n d a b o r t i o n o f o rg a n s , t h u s i n f lu e n c i n g a l so t h e g r o w t hp a t t e r n .

    A l t h o u g h t h e p r e s e n t m o d e l p e r f o r m s s a t i s f a c t o r i l y , b o t h u n d e r I s r a e l ig r e e n h o u s e ( D a y a n e t a l . , 1 9 9 3 ) a n d c o n t r o l l e d c h a m b e r c o n d i t i o n s( J o n e s e t a l . , 1 9 8 9 a ) , s e v e r a l p h y s i o l o g i c a l a n d p h y s i c a l a s p e c t s w a r r a n tf u r t h e r a t t e n t i o n .

    L e a f a p p e a r a n c e a n d l e a f d e v e l o p m e n t a r e a t r e a t e d d e s c ri p t iv e l y , b yu s i n g e m p i r i c a l f u n c t i o n s r e l a t i n g s p e ci fi c l e a f a r e a t o e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n -d i t io n s , t h u s d i s r e g a r d i n g n u m b e r a n d r a t e o f d e v e l o p m e n t o f l ea fl et s o nt h e c o m p o s i t e l e a f . A m o r e m e c h a n i s t i c a p p r o a c h b a s e d o n c e l l n u m b e r ,c e l l e x p a n s i o n r a t e a n d c a r b o h y d r a t e a v a i l a b i l i t y a s a f f e c t e d b y e n v i r o n -m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s a n d l e a f l e t p o s i t i o n w o u l d b e p r e f e r a b l e ( H o & S h a w ,1977).D e s c r i p t i o n o f f r u it i n i t i a ti o n a n d f r u it d e v e l o p m e n t r e q u ir e s m o r e d e t a il ,a s th e p a t t e r n o f f ru i t i n i ti a t io n w i t h i n th e t r us s , a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a le f f e c t s o n f l o w e r i n g a n d f r u i t s e t , e . g . v i a b i l i t y o f t h e p o l l e n , t r a n s f e r o fp o l l e n f r o m t h e a n t h e r t o t h e o v a r i e s , e t c . ( L e v y e t a l . , 1 9 7 8 ; R y l s k i ,1 9 7 9; S a w h n e y , 1 9 8 3 ; P i c k e n , 1 98 4), a r e n o t t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t . T h e s ep r o c e s s e s m a y h a v e c o n s i d e r a b l e e f f e c t s o n f r u i t n u m b e r s u n d e r g r e e n -h o u s e c o n d i t io n s .

    D r y m a t t e r a l l o c a t i o n t o t h e r o o t s a n d r o o t a c t i v i t y a r e t r e a t e d i n ar u d i m e n t a r y w a y , a s i n m o s t p u b l i s h e d c r o p g r o w t h m o d e l s ( c f . K e u l e n& S e l i g m a n , 1 9 8 7 ) . A m o r e e x p l a n a t o r y d e s c r i p t i o n , t a k i n g i n t o a c c o u n tt h e i n t e r a c t i o n s b e t w e e n a b o v e g r o u n d a n d b e l o w g r o u n d p l a n t o r g a n s ,a s w e l l a s t h e e f f e c t s o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s o n r o o t g r o w t h a n df u n c t i o n i n g , w o u l d w i d e n a p p l i c a b i l i t y o f t h e m o d e l , e s p e c i a l l y f o r s o i l -l e s s c u l t u r e s , w h e r e r o o t f u n c t i o n i n g m a y b e a c o n s t r a i n t f o r o p t i m u mc r o p p e r f o r m a n c e ( C r a p o & K e t e l l a p p e r , 1 9 8 1 ) .

    P l a n t g e n e t i c c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , e i t h e r d i r e c t l y o r t h r o u g h t h e i r r e s p o n s et o e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t io n s , g o v e r n t h e p a t t e rn o f g r o w t h a n d d e v e lo p -m e n t o f t h e c r o p . T h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a r e m o s t l ik e l y c u l t iv a r - sp e c i fi c ,s o t h a t t h e m o d e l n e e d r e - c a l i b r a t i o n f o r u s e w i t h e a c h d i f f e r e n t v a r i e t y( A u g u s t i n e e t a l . , 1 9 7 9 ; B a n g e r t h & H o , 1 98 4).

    A l s o s o m e p h y s i c a l p r o c e s s e s a r e t r e a t e d r a t h e r s u p e r f i c i a l l y . E f f e c t so f a ir h u m i d i t y a r e n o t t r e a t e d a t a l l. T h i s c o u l d b e o v e r - s im p l i f ic a t i o n ,e s p e c i a l l y u n d e r g r e e n h o u s e c o n d i t i o n s , a s h i g h h u m i d i t i e s , s u c h a s m a yo c c u r d u r i n g c l o s i n g o f t h e w i n d o w s e i t h e r t o a l l o w C O 2 e n r i c h m e n t o rt o r e d u c e h e a t d i s s i p a t i o n d u r i n g c o l d n i g h t s , m a y i n t e r f e r e w i t h v a r i o u sprocesse s , such a s ion up take , a s s imi la t ion , f e r t i l i z a t ion , f ru i t s e t , e tc .(K lapw i jk , 1975 ; P icke n , 1984).

    S i n c e e x c h a n g e p r o c e s s e s o f e n e r g y , w a t e r a n d c a r b o n d i o x i d e w i t h i nt h e c a n o p y a r e n o t c o n s i d e r e d i n t h e m o d e l , t e m p e r a t u r e a n d c a r b o n

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    15/19

    Development o f a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 159

    d i o x i d e c o n c e n t r a t i o n a r e a s s u m e d c o n s t a n t t h r o u g h o u t , a n d e x t i n c t i o no f p h o t o s y n t h e t i c a l l y a c ti v e r a d i a t io n is b a s e d o n a h o m o g e n e o u s c r o p ,w i t h o u t t a k i n g t h e r o w s t r u c t u r e i n t o a c c o u n t ( G o u d r i a a n , 1 9 7 7 ; G i j z e n& G o u d r i a a n , 1 98 9) .O r g a n f o r m a t i o n i s d e s c r i b e d e x p li c it l y i n t h e m o d e l , a n d p r o v i d e sp h y s i o l o g i c a l a g e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e e x i s t in g l e a f m a s s ; h e n c e i t a l s oa l l o w s e v a l u a t i o n o f th e p o s i t i o n o f t h e l e av e s re l a t iv e t o e a c h o t h e r a n d ,i f c o m b i n e d w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n o n s t e m n o d e l e n gt h , a ls o in a b s o l u tet e rm s . T h i s c h a r a c t e r iz a t i o n o f t h e c a n o p y w i t h i n t h e m o d e l m a y p r o v i d ea g o o d s t a r t in g p o i n t f o r th e i m p r o v e m e n t o f m o d e l d e s c ri p t i o n s f o r l e a fa r e a d e v e l o p m e n t , f r u i t i n i t i a t i o n a n d d e v e l o p m e n t , e n e r g y b a l a n c e , e t c . ,e a r l i e r d e s c r i b e d a s u n s a t i s f a c t o r y i n t h e p r e s e n t m o d e l .

    T h e m o d u l a r s e t -u p o f t h e m o d e l p r o v i d e s f le xi bi li ty a s n ew m o d u l e sc a n e a si l y b e a d d e d ( e. g. t r a n s p i r a t i o n ) a n d m o d u l e s f o r s p e ci fi c p r o c e s s e s( e. g. a ss i m i l a t i o n , o r g a n f o r m a t i o n ) c a n e a si ly b e r e p l a c e d i f i m p r o v e dd e s c r i p t i o n s b e c o m e a v a i l a b l e .

    T h e m o d e l p r o v i d e s a c o n s i s te n t s c h e m a t i c d e s c r i p t io n o f t h e t o m a t oc r o p , w h i c h fa c i li t a te s s im p l i f i c a t i o n , g e n e r a l i z a t i o n , a d a p t a t i o n t o o t h e rc r o p s o r a p p l i c a t i o n s a n d t r a n s f e r t o o t h e r s o f t w a r e a n d i n c o r p o r a t i o n i no t h e r s o f t w a r e s y s t e m s , e . g . f o r e c o n o m i c o p t i m i z a t i o n a n d g r e e n h o u s ec l i m a t e c o n t r o l .

    R E F E R E N C E SAcock, B. , Charles Edwards , D. A. , Fit ter , D. J . , Hand, D. W., Ludwig, L. J . ,W arren-Wilson J . & W ithers , A. C . (1978). The co n tr ibu t ion o f leaves f romdif fe ren t leve ls wi th in a tomato c rop to canopy ne t pho tosyn thes is : Anex p e r imen ta l ex amin a t io n o f two can o p y m o d e l s. J . exp . Bot . , 29, 815-27.Atherton, J . G. & Harr is , G. P. (1986) . Flowering. In T h e T o ma t o C r o p , eds. J.

    G . Ath e r to n & J . Ru d ich . Ch ap man an d Ha l l , New Yo rk , p p . 1 6 7 -2 0 0Ather ton , J . G. & Othman , S . (1983) . Ef fec ts o f i r rad iance and water s t res s onf lower abor t ion in the g lasshouse tomato . A c t a H o r t . , 134, 133-8.Augustine, J . J . , Stevens , M. A. & Breidenbach, R. W. (1979) . Physiological ,mo rp h o lo g ica l , an d an a to mica l , s tu d ie s o f to ma to g en o ty p es v a ry in g incarb oxy lation effic iency. J . Am. Soc . Hor t . Sc i . , 104, 338-41.Bangerth , F. & Ho, L. C. (1984) . Fruit pos it ion and fru it sequence in a truss asfac to rs de te rm in ing s ize o f tom ato f ru it s . Ann. Bot . , 53, 315-19.Calver t , A. (1959) . Ef fec t o f the ear ly env i ronm ent on deve lopm ent o f flower ingin tomato . I I . L igh t and tempera tu re in te rac t ion . J . Hor t . Sc i . , 34, 154-62.Calver t , A. (1965) . F lowe r in i t ia t ion and deve lopm ent in the toma to . Nat l .Agr ic . Adv . Serv ice Quar t . Rev . , 70, 79-80.Calver t , A. & Slack , G. (1975) . Ef fec ts o f ca rbon d iox ide en r ichm ent on g row th ,deve lopment and y ie ld o f g lasshouse tomatoes . I . Responses to con tro l ledconcen tra t ion . J . Hor t . Sc i . , 50, 61-71.

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    16/19

    160 E. Dayan et al.

    Challa, H. Vooren, J. van de (1980). A strategy for climate control in green-houses in early winter. Acta Hort . , 106, 159-64.Charles-Edwards, D. A. Ludwig, L. J. (1975). The basis of expression of leafphotosynthetic activities. In Environmental and Biological Control o f Ph oto-synthesis, ed. R. Marcelle. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 3744.Coleman, W. K. Greyson, R. I. (1976). The growth and development of theleaf in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). I. The plastochron index, a suit-able basis for description. Can. J. Bot., 54, 2421-9.Cooper, A. J. (1966). Seasonal changes in net assimilation and leaf growth ofyoung tomato plants. Acta. Hort . , 4, 76-8.Cooper, A. J. (1967). Effects of shading and time of year on net assimilationrates of young glasshouse tomato plants. Ann. Appl. Biol., 59, 85-90.Crapo, N L. Ketellapper, H. J. (1981). Metabolic priorities with respect ofgrowth and mineral uptake in roots of Hordeum, Triticum and Lycopersicon.Am. J. Bot., 68, 10-16.Dayan, E., van Keulen H. Dovrat, A. (1981). Tiller dynamics and growth ofRhodes grass after defoliation: a model named TILDYN. Agro-ecosystems,7, 101-12.Dayan, E., Enoch, Z., Fuchs, M. Zipori, I. (1986). Suitability of greenhousebuilding types and roof cover materials for growth of export tomatoes inthe Besor region of Israel. 2. Effect on fresh and dry matter production.Biotronics, 15, 71-9.Dayan, E., van Keulen, H., Jones, J. W., Zipori, I., Shmueli, D. Challa, H.(1993). Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomatogrowth model: II Field calibration and validation. Agric. Syst . , 43, 165-83,this issue.Fisher, K. J. (1977). Competition effect between fruit trusses o f the tomatoplant. Sci. Hort., 7, 37~,2.Friend, D. J. C. (1966). The effects of light and temperature on the growth ofcereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses, eds. F. L. Milthorpe J. D.Ivins. Butterworths, London, pp. 181-99.Gijzen, H. Groudriaan, J. (1989). A flexible and explanatory model of lightdistribution and photosynthesis in row crops. Agric. F or . M eteorol., 48,1 - 2 0 .Gosiewski, W., Nilwik, H. J. M. Bierhuizen, J. F. (1981). Effects of irradianceon photosynthesis of outdoor tomato cultivars. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 46,213-17.Gosiewski, W., Nilwik, H. J. M. Bierhuizen, J. F. (1982). The influence oftemperature on photosynthesis of different tomato genotypes. ScientiaHort . , 16, 109-15.Goudriaan, J. (1977). Crop Micrometerology: A Simulation Study. SimulationMonographs, Pudoc, Wageningen, 249 pp.Goudriaan, J. de Ruiter, H.E. (1983). Plant growth in response to CO 2enrichment, at two levels of nitrogen and phosphorus supply. I. Drymatter, leaf area and development. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 31, 157-69,

    Heuvelink, E. Marcelis, L. F. M. (1989). Dry matter distribution in tomatoand cucumber. Acta Hort . , 260, 1-9.Ho, L. C. (1980). Control of import into tomato fruits. Ber. Deutsch, Bot, Ges.,93, 315-25.

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    17/19

    Development of a greenhouse tomato growth m odel: I 161

    Ho , L . C . & S h aw, A . F . (1 9 7 7 ) . C a rb o n eco n o m y an d t r an s l o ca t i o n o f 1 4 C i nl ea f le ts o f t h e s ev en th l e a f o f t o m a t o d u r i n g l e a f ex p an s i o n . Ann. Bot . , 41,833-48 .Ho , L . C . , S ju t , V. & Ho ad , G. V. (1983). The e f fec t o f ass imi la te supp ly in f ru i tg ro wt h an d h o rm o n e l ev e l i n t o m a t o p l an t s . Plan t Growth Reg . , 1, 155-71.H urd , R . G . & Coop er , A . J. (1967). Increa s ing f lower nu m ber in s ing le - t russt o m a t o es . J . Hort. Sei. , 42, 181-228.Hu rd , R . G . & T h o rn l ey , J . H . M . (19 74 ). A n an a l y s i s o f th e g ro wt h o f y o u n gtom ato p lan t s in wa ter cu l tu re a t d i f fe ren t l igh t in teg ra ls a nd C O 2 concen-t rat ions . I . Physiological aspects . Ann. Bot. , 38, 375-88.Hu rd , R . G . , Ga y , A . P . & M ount i f i e ld , A. C . (1979). Th e e f fec t o f par t i a lf l o wer r em o v a l o n t h e r e l a t i o n b e t ween ro o t , s h o o t an d f ru i t g ro wt h i n t h ei n d e t e rm i n a t e t o m a t o . Ann. appl. Biol., 93, 77-89.Hu s s ey , G . (1 96 3a ). G ro w t h an d d ev e l o p m en t in th e y o u n g t o m a t o . I . Th e e f fec to f t em p e ra t u re an d l ig h t in t en si ty o n g ro wt h o f th e s h o o t ap ex an d l e a fp r imord ia . J . exp. Bot. , 14, 316-25.Hu s s ey , G . (1 9 6 3 b ) . Gro wt h an d d ev e l o p m en t i n t h e y o u n g t o m a t o . I I . Th ee f fec t o f d e fo l i a ti o n o n t h e d ev e l o p m en t o f t h e s h o o t ap ex . J . exp. Bot. , 14,326-33 .Hu s s ey , G . (19 65 ). G ro w t h an d d ev e l o p m en t i n t h e y o u n g t o m a t o 1 II . Th e e f f ec to f n ig h t an d d ay t em p e ra t u re s o n v eg e t a t iv e g ro wt h . J . exp. Bot. , 16,373-85 .Jones , J . W. , Dayan, E. , Seginer , I . , Jones , P. , Zipori . I . & Allen , L. H. J r .(1989a). On-line com puter control sys tem fo r greenhouses under high radia-t ion and temperature. B AR D p ro j ec t US -8 7 1 -8 4 . F i n a l r ep o r t . Ag r i cu l t u ra lEn g i n eer i ng D ep a r t m en t , Un i v e r s i t y o f F l o ri d a , Ga i n es v il le , F L , US A.Jones , J . W. , Dayan , E . , van Keu len , H. & Chal la , H. (1989b) . Model l ingt o m a t o g ro wt h fo r o p t i m i z i n g g reen h o u s e t em p e ra t u re s an d ca rb o n d i o x i d eco n cen t r a t i o n s . Acta Hor t . , 248, 207-16.Jones , P. , Al len , L. H. , J r . , Jones , J . W. , Boote, K. J . & Campbel l , W. J . (1984).S o y b ean can o p y g ro wt h , p h o t o s y n t h es i s , an d t r an s p i r a t i o n r e s p o n s es t owh o l e s ea s o n ca rb o n d i o x i d e en r i ch m en t . Agron. J . , 76 , 633-7 .Keulen, H. van & Sel igman, N. G. (1987). S imula t ion o f W ater U se , Ni t rogenNutr i t ion and Growth o f a Spr ing W hea t Crop, S i m u l a t i o n M o n o g r a p h s ,Pudoc , Wagen ingen , 310 pp .

    Keu len , H . van & Sto l , W. (1991) . Q uan t i t a t ive aspec t s o f n i trogen in p lan t s .Fert Res . , 27, 151-60.Klapw i jk , D. (1975). Ef fec t s o f ae ria l humid i f i ca t ion on the g ro wth o f yo un gt o m a t o p l an t s . An n u a l R ep o r t G l a s s h o u s e C ro p s R es ea rch an d Ex p e r i m en t a lS ta t ion N aaldw i jk , 1973 and 1974 , pp . 52 -55 .Klapw i jk , D. (1981). Ef fec t o f season on ear ly tom ato g row th and dev e lopm entrates . Neth. J. agric. Sci. , 29, 179-88.Levy , A. , Ra b ino v i tch , H . D. & Keda r , N. (1978) . Mo rpho log ica l and phys io -log ica l chara c te rs in f luenc ing f lower d rop and f ru i t se t o f toma toe s a t h ight em p e ra t u re s . Euphyt ica , 27, 211-18.Ludw ig , L . J . & W i thers , A. C . (1984). Ph o tosy n the t ic responses to CO 2 inre l a ti o n t o l e a f d ev e l o p m en t i n t o m a t o . In Photosynthesis Research, Vol. 4,ed . C . S y b es m a . Mar t i n u s N i j h o f f / Dr W . J u n k , Th e Hag u e , p p . 2 1 7 -2 0 .Marce l i s , L . F . M. , Heuvel ink , E . & Koning , A. N. M. de (1989) . Dynamic

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    18/19

    162 E. Dayan et al.

    simulation of dry matter distribution in greenhouse crops. Acta Hor t . , 248,269-76,Mihailov, I. (1975). A study on the number of ovules per fruit set in tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrid combinations and the correspondingparent cultivars. C. R. Acad. Agric. G. Dimitor, 8, 45-7.Monteith, J. L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond B, 193, 277-94.Nourai, A. H. A. (1980). Grow th correlat ion and f low er d evelopment in tomato.PhD thesis University of Reading, UK.Peat, W. E. (1970). Relationships between photosynthesis and light intensity inthe tomato. Ann. Bot. , 34, 319-28.Penning de Vries, F. W. T. (1975). The cost of maintenance processes in plantcells. Ann. Bot., 39, 77-92.Penning de Vries, F. W. T., van Laar, H. H. van Chardon, M. C. M. (1983).Bioenergetics of the growth of seeds, fruits and storage organs. In Potent ia lprodu ct ivi ty o f FieM Crops U nder Dif ferent Environments . International RiceResearch Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp. 15-33.Picken, A. J. F. (1984). A review of pollinat ion and fruit set in the tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Hort. Sci. , 59, 103.Picken, A. J. F., Stewart, K. Klapwijk, D. (1986). Germination and vegetativedevelopment. In The Tomato Crop , ed. J. G. Atherton J. Rudich.Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 111-66.Russell, C. R. Morris, D. A. (1982). Invertase activity, soluble carbohydratesand inflorescence development in the tomato. Ann. Bot. , 49, 89-98.

    Russell, C. R. Morris, D. A. (1983). Patterns of assimilate distribution andsource-sink relationship in the young reproductive tomato plant (Lycopersi-con esculentum Mill.). Ann. Bot., 52, 357-63.Rylski, I. (1979). Fruit set and development of seeded and seedless tomato fruitsunder diverse regimes of temperature and pollination. J. Am. Soc. Hort .Sci., 36, 195-205.Sawhney, V, K. (1983). The role of temperature and its relationship withgiberellic acid in the development of floral organs of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum). C an . J. Bot. , 61, 1258-65.Seginer, I. Shina, G. (1989). Op timization o f greenhouse controls. BARD projectUS-871-84. Final report. Agricultural Engineering Department, Universityof Florida, Gainsville, FL, USA.Seligman, N. G. (1990). The crop model record: promise or a poor show? InTheoret ical Produc t ion Ecology." Ref lect ions and Prospects , eds R. Rabbinge,J. Goudriaan, H. van Keulen, F. W. T. Penning de Vries H. H. van Laar.Simulation Monographs no. 34, Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp.249-63.Spitters, C. J. T., Keulen, H. van Kraalingen, D. W. G. van (1989). A simpleand universal crop growth simulator. SUCROS87. In S imula t ion andSystems Management in Crop Protect ion, eds R. Rabbinge, S. A. WardH. H, van Laar. Simulation Monographs no. 32, Pudoc, Wageningen,pp. 147 81.Starck, Z. (1983). Photosynthesis and endogenous regulation of the source-sinkrelation in tomato plants. Photosynthet ica , 17, 1-11.Tanaka, A. , Fujita, K. Kikuchi, K. (1974a). Nutrio-physiological studies on

  • 8/12/2019 Development, Calibration and Validation of a Greenhouse.pdf

    19/19

    Development o f a greenhouse tomato growth model: I 163

    the tomato plant. I. Outline of growth and nutrient absorption. Soi l Sc i .P l a n t N u t r . , 20, 57-68.Tanaka, A., Fujita, K. Shioya, M. (1974b). Nutrio-physiological studies onthe tomato plant. II. Translocation of photosynthates. S o i l S c i . P l a n t N u t r . ,20, 163-71.Thornley, J. H. M. Hurd, R. G. (1974). An analysis of the growth of youngtomato plants in water culture at different light integrals and CO~ concen-trations. II. A mathematical model. A n n . B o t . , 38, 389-400.Thornley, J. H. M., Hurd, R. G. Pooley, A. (1981). A model of growth of thefifth leaf of tomato. A n n . B o t . , 48, 327-40.Tucker, D. J. (1981). Phytochrome regulation of leaf senescence in cucumberand tomato. P l a n t S c i . L e t t . , 23, 103-8.Voorem J. van de, Welles, G. W. H. Hayman, G. (1986). Crop production. InT h e T o m a t o C r o p , eds J. G. Atherton J. Rudich. Chapman and Hall,New York, pp. 581-624,Vriesenga, J. D. Honma, S. (1974). Inheritance of tomato inflorescence. Part2. Flower number and branching. J. H e r e d . , 65, 43-7.Walker, A. J. Ho, L. C. (1977). Carbon translocation in the tomato: carbonimport and fruit growth. A n n . B o t . , 41, 813-23.Walker, A. J., Ho, L. C. Baker, D. A. (1978). Carbon translocation in thetomato: pathway to carbon metabolism in the fruit. A n n . B o t . , 42, 901 9.Whisler, F. D., Acock, B., Baker, D. N., Fye, R. E., Hodges, H. F., Lambert, J.R., Lemmon, H. E., McKinnion, J. M. Reddy, V. R. (1986). Crop simu-lation models in agronomic systems. A d v . A g r o n . , 40, 141-208.