development of a sensitive and quantitative pd-l1 ... · pd-l1 veratag h 3 p i 3 k v e r a t a g...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Development of a sensitive and quantitative PD-L1 ... · PD-L1 VeraTag H 3 P I 3 K V e r a T a g Spearman r = 0.4796 -value = 0.0027 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 0.25 1 2 4 8 SCCHN cancer](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022011822/5ec3cd516858954c363a341e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Programmed death-ligand 1
(PD-L1)
anti-PD-L1
Rabbit mAb E1L3N
Goat anti-Rabbit
Cleaved
VeraTag
Capillary Electrophoresis
PD-L1 VeraTag® Assay
Slide based FFPE
DTT
VeraTag units = RF/mm2 = Relative Fluorescence per mm2
tumor
Conclusions
AACR 2015
#LB-281
Development of a sensitive and quantitative PD-L1 immunoassay superior to IHC with
application in human FFPE tissue samples Jerry Wallweber, Ahmed Chenna, Roy Ravanera, David Stathas, Weidong Huang and Christos Petropoulos
Introduction: Cancer immunotherapy approaches and targets are rapidly expanding for the
treatment of many different types of cancer. The programmed cell death-1 receptor (PD-1)
and its ligand PD-L1 have garnered a great deal of interest lately, partially due to current
therapeutic agents demonstrating a long and durable clinical response with low toxicities in
several cancer types. Binding of the PD-1 receptor on activated T-cells to PD-L1 expressing
tumor cells reduces T-cell activation, thereby evading an immune response against tumor
progression. PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been shown to be a
prognostic and potential predictive biomarker for response to both anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1
therapy, however, currently the IHC assay is not standardized and the definitions used for
positivity are variable and subjective due to a visual scoring system. A lack of sensitivity of the
IHC assay may partially explain the observed response to therapy in patients whose tumors
were identified as IHC=0/PD-L1 negative. In an attempt to offer a more sensitive and
quantitative assay, we developed a PD-L1 protein expression assay using the VeraTag®
technology. The PD-L1 VeraTag assay utilizes the release of a unique fluorescent reporter
(VeraTag), which is measured with high sensitivity via capillary electrophoresis to accurately
and objectively quantify the amount of PD-L1 protein expression in FFPE samples.
Methods: The anti-PD-L1 rabbit monoclonal antibody E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technologies)
was utilized in the VeraTag assay together with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody
conjugated to the VeraTag reporter. FFPE cancer cell line lines were used to optimize antigen
retrieval, primary antibody concentration and signal/background ratio, with emphasis on the
lower end of the dynamic range.
Results: VeraTag measurements of PD-L1 protein expression correlated to both IHC and
PD-L1 gene expression (CCLE, R squared=0.7212) in FFPE cancer cell lines. The PD-L1
protein expression by VeraTag and IHC was compared across a group of FFPE squamous
cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and HER2- and HER2+ breast samples.
VeraTag assays for the measurement of the HER-family of receptors (HER1, HER2 and
HER3 total, HER1-HER1 homodimer, HER2-HER3 heterodimer, phospho-HER3 and HER3-
PI3 kinase complex) were evaluated for correlation to PD-L1 protein expression in these two
cancer types. There was good agreement between the VeraTag and IHC measurements of
PD-L1 protein expression, with the added advantage of the VeraTag assay providing an ~5-
fold range of PD-L1 expression within the IHC=0 category.
Conclusions: We have developed a sensitive and quantitative measurement of PD-L1
protein expression in FFPE human SCCHN and breast cancer samples utilizing the VeraTag
technology. Measurement of PD-L1 expression from clinical samples with the VeraTag assay
is warranted.
Abstract
Monogram Biosciences/LabCorp Inc., South San Francisco, CA
Quantitative FFPE VeraTag® Assays
PD-L1 Protein and mRNA Distributions
VeraTag® Assay Workflow
PD-L1 IHC compared to VeraTag®
PD-L1 vs EGFR-family of Biomarkers
Correlations with significant p-values (p<0.05) are shown in red.
Spearman r HER1/EGFR HER2 HER3 HER1-HER1 Homodimer HER2-HER3 Heterodimer phospho-HER3 HER3-PI3 kinase Complex
Breast n/a 0.4583 0.2848 n/a 0.3893 0.4410 0.4796SCCHN -0.0580 0.1100 -0.0569 -0.2786 0.1092 0.2151 0.4840
Spearman correlation coefficients from the relationship between PD-L1 and a
panel of EGFR-family of biomarkers as measured by VeraTag.
Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015, 8am – 12pm
0.2
5
0.5 1 2 4 8
16
32
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
32
PD-L1 VeraTagOperator #1
PD
-L1
Ve
raT
ag
Op
era
tor
#2
Reproducibility -
19 FFPE SCCHN tumors
18 of the 19 tumors (94.7%)
are within 2-fold.
PD-L1 VeraTag® Assay Characteristics
Background in FFPE cell lines and tumors
PD-L1 VeraTag
Isotype control
MB
453
MB
468
H1650
MB
231
H441
100643A
2
120635A
1
7291841
120149B
2
98910B
1
0.125
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
Ve
raT
ag
Cell lines Tumors
PD-L1 VeraTag® and mRNA Correlation Screening a panel of 14 FFPE cell lines.
Notes:
a. -1, -2 and -3 represent different FFPE preparations of the same cell line.
b. PD-L1 mRNA (log2) available from CCLE at http://www.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home
H441
MB231
MB468
MB453
H1650
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
32
PD-L1 mRNA (log2)
PD
-L1
Ve
raT
ag
Pearson R2 = 0.7881
Reproducibility -
5 replicates of 5 FFPE cell lines
Pearson R2 = 0.7210
H441
MB231 H1650
MB468
MB453
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
32
PD-L1 mRNA (log2)
PD
-L1
Ve
raT
ag
FFPE Cell Linea VeraTag mRNA (log2)
b
BT474 1.21 4.23
MB453-1 0.87 4.50
MB453-2 1.54 4.50
MB453-3 1.61 4.50
MCF7 1.11 4.57
MB468 1.12 5.07
SKBR3 0.89 5.08
TE4 1.82 5.60
SNU869 1.91 5.66
H1650 3.06 5.84
TE6 2.57 6.12
BXPC3-1 3.18 6.65
BXPC3-2 3.39 6.65
CAL27-1 3.56 6.97
CAL27-2 3.65 6.97
MB231 6.77 8.16
H441-1 17.73 8.96
H441-2 19.56 8.96
PD-L1
79 FFPE tumors
38 Breast cancer
27 SCCHN
14 NSCLC
PD-L1 protein expression by VeraTag and mRNA expression from CCLE both
show an increase in NSCLC and SCCHN over Breast cancer.
p<0.0001
Bre
ast
Lung-N
SC
SC
CH
N
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
PD
-L1
Ve
raT
ag
p<0.0001
FFPE tumors
from Asterand Bioscience Cancer cell lines from CCLE
Mann-Whitney test, p<0.0001
p = 0.0002
All
Bre
ast
Colo
recta
l
Endom
etr
ium
Kid
ney
Liv
er
Lung
Lung-S
C
Lung-N
SC
Oesophagus
Ovary
Pancre
as
Skin
Sto
mach
Head&
Neck
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
PD
-L1 m
RN
A (
log
2)
1.Pathology Review and
Macro-dissection
Template
2. Macro-dissection
3.Deparaffinization/
Rehydration
4.Antigen Retrieval 5.Antibody Incubation
& Wash
6.Photoactivated
VeraTag Release
7.VeraTag Separation
& Detection on C.E.
V
8.VeraTag Identification
& Quantification by
VeraTag Informer
9.H&E Tumor
Identification and
Area Analysis
10.Final Sample and Batch
Normalized VeraTag Result
h
V
1O2
Slide based FFPE
Cell line %CV
MB453 9%
MB468 11%
H1650 15%
MB231 5%
H441 9%
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
Breast cancer
PD-L1 VeraTag
H3P
I3K
Vera
Ta
g
Spearman r = 0.4796
p-value = 0.0027
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
SCCHN cancer
PD-L1 VeraTag
H3P
I3K
Vera
Ta
g
Spearman r = 0.4840
p-value = 0.0165
PD-L1 correlated with HER3-PI3 kinase Complex
Preclinical models support a role for the oncogenic PI3K pathway
in the regulation of PD-L1 protein expression.
Activation by:
PTEN loss or
PIK3CA mutation
Inhibition by:
PI3K, AKT or mTOR inhibitors
PI3K pathway PD-L1 protein
Consistent with this model, VeraTag measurements of PD-L1 protein expression
significantly and positively correlated with HER3-PI3 kinase complex.
•We have developed a quantitative and reproducible PD-L1 assay using the VeraTag technology to
measure PD-L1 protein expression in FFPE samples.
•The PD-L1 VeraTag assay correlated significantly to mRNA expression in a panel FFPE cell lines
over an ~50-fold dynamic range.
•The PD-L1 VeraTag assay had good reproducibility within FFPE cell lines (5 – 15% CV) and
between operators with SCCHN tumors (94.7% of the samples within 2-fold).
•The elevated distributions of PD-L1 protein as measured by VeraTag in NSCLC and SCCHN
tumors over Breast cancer tumors paralleled the relative distributions of PD-L1 mRNA in caner cell
lines derived from the same tissue types.
•The PD-L1 VeraTag assay provided a range of expression within the IHC 1+ and 2+ categories.
•VeraTag measurements of PD-L1 protein expression correlated with HER3-PI3 kinase complex in
both Breast and SCCHN tumors, supportive of a role for the PI3K pathway in the regulation of PD-
L1 protein expression.
•Clinical evaluation of PD-L1 protein expression by an objective, quantitative and reproducible
VeraTag assay may help stratify patients for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapies.
PD-L1 IHC utilizing the same primary antibody (E1L3N) as the VeraTag assay.
PD-L1 VeraTag separated
IHC 0 and 1+ by 7.9-fold
Cell line IHC VeraTag
MB453 0 0.39
H1650 1+ 3.08
MB231 3+ 7.90
H441 3+ 23.27
PD-L1
PD-L1 VeraTag provided a wide range of
expression in both IHC 1+ and 2+.
HER2 Receptor
anti-HER2
anti-HER2 Cleaved
VeraTag
Capillary
Electrophoresis
HERmark® Assay
Slide based FFPE
VeraTag units = RF/mm2 = Relative Fluorescence per mm2
tumor
1O2
SCCHN
NSCLC
Breast cancer
Cell Lines
0 1+ 2+ 3+0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
16
32
PD-L1 VeraTag vs IHC
IHC
PD
-L1
Ve
raT
ag