development of total quality management technology for the
TRANSCRIPT
KAERI/RR-1606/95 KR9600228
Development of Total Quality ManagementTechnology for The Establishment of
Better-Quality R&D System
IK •?• * ffl 2C
u 05
7flf
1996 Hd 1
6]
71,
si,
NEXT PAGE(S)left BLANK
-fl-
I.
II.
POWER-
^-8:
III.
TQM(Total Quality Management)
O]nl
- 3 -
TQM
. ^ , Top-down
Bottom-up ^ e ^ # 3^1-711 ^S}-A]^ ^ H ^
QA
^ l ^ T Q M *
Q A
TQM ^ ^ « f l H 1^
IV.
'96^ l^-¥-^ ^^ 7)^r^^}^o] PBS(Project Base System)^ 7}
' 9 5 ^ ^ 7l^.^^-ai)-^l^ ^^-71^01 '96
'95H!
- 4 -
60%
TQM
TQM-i-
v.
5U-8- 5 J ^
- 5 -
3
6
8
1 # *1 - 10
2 # £•£• 12
1 1 1 TQM^ ^ s j - 7l^ 12
1. TQM^] ^ -^^ .^ 12
7K # « e ] 3 ] U:^ 12
14. TQCS. 1 ^ i ^ : 15
cf. TQM-^5.^ #^i 17
2. #^^^7l^ 30
7}. ^ ^ 30
Chart) 32
34
el-. ^^i(Scattergram) 35
35
K H ] 37
K «:#£(Flow Chart) 37
>. ^sl:£(Control Chart) 38
K -g-^ 71^71] (Quality Function Deployment) 39
Decision Program Chart) 42
% ?}<$$ # 3 3 * 8 71^ a)-8- AfaJI 43
£ ^ 7 | ^ 3-g- Al-ajl 43
7V. LG-EDS * 1 ^ 43
48
50
2 ^ ^ ^ 7 l ^ ^ 7}<%$) - ^ ^ ^ 7 1 ^ ^-g- Aj-sfl 52
7>. AECL 52
M-. ABB CE 57
cK ORNL 64
2}. Defency Nuclear Agency 68
n>. SIEMENS 72
pf. GE Electronic Service 77
3 3 # ^ ^ ^ 7 l « ^ 7fl<g-g- *1# ^ ^ - 83
1. ^
2. #€7flM ^ ^ ^ o l l ^ t b - a ^ 84
3. -=-fi1i^ ^ -¥ -^^ ^^of l -£*V ^ ^ 87
4. «a jf '33l£. ^3-^1 ^*V Adl- 89
5. •§• 71-?-^6fl ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ - 90
6. TQM ^ o ) l 5U<H ^1^-5]^ ^^1^<H1 ^ r * Ad^ 91
7. TQM^I- ^ - 8 - ^ * ^ ^ #^°fl ^r*!- ^ S - 92
8. TQM 3-8-i- fl* ^ - r ^ ^ ° i l -*V ^ ^ 94
H v 95
98
- 7 -
S.
S. 2.2.1-1 ^.fi-71-^^ TQM 4 ^ 3 ^ 47
S. 2.2.1-2 BEST-Q 7fl« 51
S. 2.2.2-1 DNA2] TQM ^ ^ 70
& 2.2.2-2 DNA^l # ^ 7 f l ^ ^Aifl-8- 73
- 8 -
2.1.2-1 PDPC ^5) tgEfl 42
2.2.1-1 ViQ 7fl^£ 45
2.2.1-2 TQM * l l * t i 45
2.2.1-3 «8-!M|4! *M1 46
2.2.1-4 LG-EDSA>^ TQM ^ 1 ^ ^ 46
2.2.1-5 * ^ * * 7lwV 49
2.2.1-6 S§5}-^<S(^)^ TQM ^ 3 51
2.2.2-1 ABB CE4£] # ^ 7 ] ] ^ 4 ^ 62
2.2.2-2 DNA^l # ^ ^ : ^ - ¥ - ^ 71
2.2.2-3 SIEMENSAl-si # ^ 7 f l ^ ^ 7 f l 4 ^ 72
2.2.2-4 71-^, Al V, uj-g-5] ^^5L 73
2.2.2-5 TQM J l ^ 75
2.2.2-6 GE*}4\ W£&$ 3,^ 78
- 9 -
M-
R & D
TQC(Total Quality Control)^ TQM(Total Quality
Management)^4. °] ¥ 7fl^S] ^ol^-$- #7.\±r ^^7l^ofl cflgfl
"Control"^- ^-i^l-jl TQM£r T Q C ^ ^ ^^£l<H "Management"^ ^v^
1980
- 10 -
afljl*kii*>
ABB
AECL
37)1
QA TQM I AV c l >-. a -,il -7J 11I o -*i >— u. - - I I I J "'I
TQJVN
TQM*
ii
TQMii)
1.
7\.
(1)
1920V* t l H
, SQC(statistical quality control)^)
#Bj.E(quality control chart)!- Jl?>5>oi -y-^otj ^.TJJ 7'H «V5UJB., 1928H4«flfe
(Dodge)^ ^ ( R o m i g H
SQC7r
(2) SQC^l
- 12 -
ASA(American Standards Association)^
, 1942H!
SQC7>
7 l i
AV«a786JA]
Aj-Aj-o]
- 13 -
'3}-*H ^(scient i f ic management)'*1 ^ M t f c k El l^e]^ ^SJ-^ 20
SQC71-
. 2*1-
^-^|(correlation)oli4
(experimental design) ^ &-8r f-?fl l ^ § J H ^
fe 3-3.2.3. 1946^
. 1950-53^ 4°)«H1 °11" ^ ^Vfe- *r*\- ^ ( 1 5 0 ) ^ ^ SQC
t * f-a^-S. ^ QA
QCt- «V<H*^-i4, 1950^^ ^7l-¥-E]^ QC
- 14 -
-frfc* Bpft-^k iahio to^ ^e-fcn llofegx frk-^-ofcivfr ^lo '-la
klb(Pi996T '•i«rktafc:&#&HHfrltoeoa froi It*
© * * ^Po-gOO ^"of t^ toOOl llopi£96T Rlb^-R. "-fcilo DOX to^^, log:
{e-a^ fr-S-liijjfclo-tn: #^- [o lo •
096T
096T
TQC
©
©
. QC
QC
54
71
CD $X
- 16 -
3 * * *M tt^olafcn. W 3 4I#*H # i 3 ^(creative
adaptation)^:
QC -
* * **«HI>H ^ " ^ t - ^ ^ ^ S^-^^] ^ - i . O.Z)JL v}?% (market i
1 l E.(product o
oj «T»o^ ^ D ) 1 - *}-B].g. ^A7l- $14. nl^-sj Kirk PatrickiiL^r^ TQC^1>H3 T(total)
'close loop'-^"*! J L ^ H ^ ^ M ^ . ^ - ^ ^ ^ ^ *>i43 jie]e}-JL
QC1-
1960^
QC ^lia-fil a.# ©
- 17 -
(1)
TQCS1- TQM^ ^ o ] ^ ZLI-O] 70Vi^ci} 544. TQC^r ^<L>7]^<H1 cfl«fl quality
"control"^- 7&ZL*\JL TQM^: TQC^l^ ^ - ^ s ] ^ "management"^ 7ov^^-i- ¥ ^
1980\lcfl
Do it right the first ti
Crosby^) *m°] 7}v}& ^M. O.s)^ TQ1VH
QCCQuality Control)^-QA(quality Assurance)-^-TQM(Total
- 18 -
Quality Management)^ Ml &A£- 3 - ^ *r $X^. <*7]*\ QA^ ^ ^
* ^ 5a
(2)
(7)-)
-"Quality is conformance to your customer's requirements." [Control Data
Corporation]
- "Quality is what the customer perceives."!Feigenbaum 83]
- "Quality is fitness for use, not conformance to specifications.!Juran 51]
- "Giving people what they have the right to expect." iTribusJ
- "The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear
on its ability to satisfy (a user's) given needs." I American Society for
Quality Control, 1983]
*\*)±7\ 3.^2\ -S-T1^- 7lcflo)] ^ - - g - * ^ ^ ZL^^ 'quality product' *~Sr
'quality s
TQM
TQM3)- -a-Af - 7 f l ^ l i QM l 5U^. ISO(^-^1 a ^ ^ 7 l ^ ) 5 ] ^ ^ - ^ ^ S ] ? ] T C 1 7 6
1 ISO 8402^] 7H^^-?1 DIS(Draft International Standard:
QM : # ^ * 9 - ^ * ^ * H *M*Hr * * ^ - S #^^^(Quali ty Control),
(Quality Assurance), Tr^fl^(Quality Improvement)0!
- 19 -
TQM : EL*\°\ 3.^ A%°\ M <$*?-<*}*] S.^ &$]*}$ °}°A^ fl*M QM-g-
cflofl ^
§<y^^ 7^oj fltq.. [juran and
Gryna, McMillan]
-8: TQC 1- ^ i*>cf . Department of Defense^ TQM*
^^•^c- Company Wide Quality ControKCWQC), Quality Improvement Process(QIP),
Statistical Qualit-y ControKSQC), Zero Defects(ZD)-^-i-
f. [Feigenbaum 83]
-TQM£: S]A>S1 ^ # 4 ^ t t ] ^ , ZL21 al Zl^-S *>l
f. [NPRDC Brief]
. U.S. Oakland]
. [j. Banks]
fi.^- ^ € 3 ^l^^^l ^ ^ ° 1 ^ . [B. Bergman]
TQM-8r aia|Sl -9.^1- ^^-*] %-^m ^ A ^ ^ 3)-^* ^ ^ - ^ ^ «>a.7fl
- 20 -
. [c. F. Hendricks and A. Triplett]
- CWQC
- 'total quality'fe
. [NPRDC Brief]
f. [Ishikawa 85]
(3) (TQM Philosophy)
(commitment^
^ 5 ] aoVA] (rational vehicles)^-
techniques)^-
people)<>1
# ^ ^ - ^ 7 ] ^(scientific quality control
ifl-¥-?!«lcl-. [Control Data Corp; Ishikawa 85; Deming 86;
Juran 80] ;
7i -(customer del ight)^)
- 21 -
ITaguchi, Ishikawa 85; Deming 86; BoudreauxJ
71$ (tool W « - g - *l*<Hiflfe 3) 51-g--g-
process flow chart, cause-and-effect
analysis(fishbone diagram), pareto charts, histograms, scatter diagrams, run
charts, statistical process control(SPC) charts^]- £ £ 7l^(tool)-i- ^l-g-^-o.^.
. [Ishikawa 82; Taguchi, Juran 80; Boudreaux]
j rJlolEfofl 7 l i # ^JL S i^ "common
language"!- 4^-*))c>]:*>^ °1 common language^
iCrosby 79; Juran 64; Ishikawa 85] ; ul^Jj?}:#•§•
management system)-!-
tils. SI* SHHJL a f t
quality'^1
quality'-21
'common causes'5}-
"special causes"AS.
^ ^ } (people-focused
'poor
'poor
. [Deming 82 Juran 64]
- 22 -
[Shewhart, Deming 82;
Crosby 82]
|-. [Deming 86;
Juran 64]
. [Ishikawa 85J
97fl 7fl\g-§-o] ^wv^o .5 . cfl-^-^-^ QM ^
# 4 ) ^ ( p o l i c y management)^ ^^-^5](daily management)
4 * l- 'S SPC, #^7l^^7fl(QFD:Quality Function Deployment),
- 23 -
^ - 5 . 71-71
^ * ! •
(4)
TQM-g: m <$^, ^ ^ ^ 1 ^"^ ^tfl, ^ ^ ^ ^ 1 - 31^51 ^7f, ^ ^<a(rework)^
^ I S . 7fl>H7151 (improvement opportunitiesH ^-^a i^ l ^ ^ ^ -
^ TQM
(performance)
"^-^r 60% (Beker, Golomski, Lory 1994)<H1 70% ^^(Huton 1992)5.
ofl
TQM l
(7f) TQM l
1) ^ - i -
2)
3)
- 24 -
4)
^(Internal customer)0!
Measurement
^ external customer(5i-^-
2)
- 25 -
3)
4)
7K-°] Total Quality51 ^-5.7*
1) Internal Customer
KanjHl ^ ^ ^ # ^ ^ "J
g-^SRr
2) S ^ 4«a^r ^3.41^1 cf.
'special cause'^1 7l«?]^l-^ $Sj-t- ^1^^-^.S.Mi, ZLe]i ^ ^ i ^ ^ 'common cause
istogram), Pareto analysis(^-iH|S &q\ control
- 26 -
scatter diagram*^ £ )
3)
• yield/scrap^0!
4 ) <H|*tf
>-8r TQM^l ^ ^
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis7l- 7}% ^ °^^ 9X
0.5. Foolproofing^, Kepner TregocHl S\n 7flt"^ Failure
Prevention Analysis7|-
5) 2*1
- 27 -
6)
^ ^ ( t o t a l quality)"*
3f-<>IH <H*Hr *]•**£ n # T K M # 'poor quality'^
7)
80%
^^](Quality Awareness)5L
7H(Employee Involvement)^^ £ 1 -
8) Stitflfe
TQM* 3-8-tJ" ^-T- 37) ^ i #3].g. ur^ r 5i
1)
=a(strengths)^ c)*«H 7fl^d^ ^ ^ 7 r °> $ 1 ^ S(weaknesses)^: iA}-3}
- 28 -
2)
CD A *t*\%^ #*» '-f-t! W(priorities)'-g-
(2) M- 3ol2Hr 484* 711 «fe #*fl3 ^oj^>a(total ownership)^-
3)
<D *^lfl-^I, ^^ l« l l^ , 7l^-^o] f-TflSj-jr). ^ ^ =. T Q M
4)
CD 7H-<d ^-^(improvement process)-i:
5)
CD 7fl^
r 5a*
. o) ^3}.=. £ 3 ) 5 . ^ ( ^ T Q M
- 29 -
2.
7V. %•
(1)
ail
(2)
- 30 -
O
O
O
OO 717||
O
O
O
O
O
3 71,
(3)
(7H ^.M
^ , ZL ^ ^ ¥7}
- 31 -
-8-71
14. 34efl££(Pareto Chart)
Alfredo Pareto^
ZL 3 7 l f
v i t a l few)ol
- 32 -
; trivial many)-8:
(1)
7]
(J)
(2)
71- C-ll
- 33 -
Cf. * l i
(1) * 1 ^
3-si-a- ^ ^ ^ ^ sat)-.
7)71]
- 34 -
£01.
1-
(1) ^ ^ ^ -g-
(7\) ^^<4 (tf)
- 35 -
nflnfcf ZL vfl-g-ofl flfl3. n ] - 3 * 7}<Qf%
2)
3)
4) ^4-8-
- 36 -
(14)
« •
^Hio f l
Diagram)
Kaoru Ishikawa^ o|
xr "cause and effect diagram"^-^.
Til • ^«1 (Machine), 3)-^ « o ^ (Method)^ 4M
(People), ^«l(Plant)^ 4P1- 1" ^r
0.5. -fjsh bone chart"a
al), 7]
3 «| (Policy), ^^(Procedure),
^ - *!*Kfactar)7V
Chart)
- 37 -
]s.«t(Feedback)
INPUT
FEEDBACKPROCESS
OUTPUT
FEEDBACK
(Control chart)
(1) «l>i
cflolEi7l-
(2)
- 38 -
«*}.qt|.. ^ ^ o f l A i ^o j ^ - j ol o^^cfia wV^Al '^ol-ol a-g. ^o jc f
(TooDf^l ^«1 A > ^ - S | ^ ^}o_s. #€7l^^7fl(Quality Function Deployment
Decision Program Chart)7>
711 (Quality Function Deployment)
(1)
7}
- 39 -
=8*1,
y Deployment system) : ±*}x}2] -fi.^2-^-^^ ^7fl^.^-Ei QC
QFD^l- ^ ^ r
7) fl*|-^ A]-g-^^ 3..
(2) QFD
rProduct Outj <HH rMarket Inj
- 40 -
3,7} # ^ m
(3)
7]
7 ^ 4
2
- 41 -
*r. 4 - ^ 1 ^ 31 (P rocess Decision Program Chart : PDPC)
tfl-g-
(1) PDPC^
2.1.2-14
A
A2 -» A3
\r
I B , I - I B :\
D,
Ap
> [a,Cn
D2 Ds
2.1.2-1 PDPCtM
- 42 -
2131 ^ ^ g - ^ ^ t f l S H H W^^^^^r ^^^ 7l<a # . LG-EDS A)
TQM-S-
71-. LG-EDS A ] ^
SLC(System Life Cycle)!-
71511- A\^
A]^^(Total Quality Management)^
ViQ(Value in Quality for Customer Success)^.
- 43 -
3S(Simplification, Standardization, Speed) -£•§•-£ ^sfl ^A>a^ A}
9 3 ^ 1
52^-
ISO 9001
- 44 -
TQM-i-
(1) ViQ(Value in Quality for Customer Sucess)
. o)ofl
2.2.1-1 ViQ
LG-EDS TQM 2.2.1-24
2.2.1-2 TQM
- 45 -
n ?\
2.2.1-34
- 7l# ^ ^
2.2.1-3
(2) TQM
TQM 2.2.1-44
51 :T5-*
"BTVl i l l Forum
*«^7KQA)
2.2.1-4 LG-EDS*l-£l TQM
- 46 -
TQM ^
S 2.2.1-1
S. 2.2.1-13}-
TQM
#^^i^7> Forum
£-°t£ 3&7V n#
^ €
^-^
#^<3 #¥^1^ 4J - ,
(3) TQM
- 47 -
-frftU
T6-OI9 (T)
a 9 H
MXX)6OSI ^ i b ^ S I &W
adij '
ft
ft^:
21>fl7l ^^^<a^-o> 3 ^ # 7lo] * j * .
3 U M , ^uL7|^, a j a ^ l .
QC(#*)^) QKl^fl^)
2.2.1-5
(2) BIG-21
TQC
-S-"!, '94^0)]^ ISO9001
QC, TQC, ISO J2.S QM
1- -fsj) ' 9 5 ^ ^
fe BIG-21 2 0 0 0 ^
. [12]
- TQM
- 49 -
- Q M xL-$cSL
5J
7fl
T7 TJ TTI -.1 T A l i t TTI -il nl
- 50 -
1950V! 10 <Hl I ^ ^ i } . ^ * ^ r 91*8
1994^ 1 2 ^ ^ ISO9001S1
BEST-Q ^ - ^ ^ 1 ^ : S 2.1.1-24
S. 2.2.1-2 BEST-Q
B (Buyer)E(Effective)
S(Supply)T(Total)
Q(QM)
(1) TQM
TQM 2.2.1-6*]-
TQM
, 2^. lit)
ZL
2.2.1-6 TQM
QM QM
- 51 -
- QM
- QM
- QM 5!
(2) TQM
Q(Quality)
M(Management)
2.
7V. AECL
- 52 -
l980»d
AECL-£
. AECL^r
^ s } ^ TQM(Total QuaUty Management)
TQM^l^fe -8-^fe CQKContinuous Quality Improvement)^ cj
. AECL°1
1970H1 o}n| AECL^r ^ ^ - ^ i ^ ^si^-^o)lAi # ^ ^ . ^ ^ - aj-g-Sfi
.°i+, 1980^ ^«>
TQM^r
i(Architect-engineering divisionWH^
ZLl-^: 5 1 ^ - ^ ^ ^S,H^4r Crosby
- 53 -
TQM*
Canadian Standards Association N286-i-
CQI 3-8-8: 71 5 | QA
(1) TQM/CQI2]
- Teamwork
con-
QA S
1995^ 1-a AECL-gr ^^^-S-sJ. ^S7l^^-o>* ^3:^§H ^ ^ * « ^ ^ ^ i i f-
-fe CQI
Teamwork^ 7
- 54 -
CQI
(2) CQI
CQI -£*|2}- ^-¥-^5] 711^^- ^*V 7 ) < £ J U L 3 - £ 3 £ : CQI
C Q I
3 H CQI ^ ^ 1 ^ tSI-Al ^^-^- ^ ^ ojt}. £ ^ . a = . ^^xVfe CQI
el- Y^-fe
CQI1- ^^^1-Jl ^r«^^7l $1*H ^ ^ ^ ^^71- ^As-fcf. CQI ^*» ^3]^1 CQI#
. CQI
CQI
CQI
CQI
- 55 -
(3)
AECL°1 CQIt-
CQI q-%-±3.
cost) ^ ^ 1 ^5icf. at!- ^ S S H I
AECL21 ^ ^ - S ^ : S^-^-^-71- 3l7Jj-i- 7 ^ 2 Si^.^ a€-«-§-<>l CQI
CQI^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 1 4-6 ai^^-el (Million dollar)^
(4) ^ f CQI
- 56 -
1995H1 CANDO
$X^ 7131- 7 ^ # 4 . AECL^r T Q M * 3*1) «fl^«||o>nv
fe 2Z--
Integration Committee)^
•a-
^- QiC(Quality
-. ABB CE
ABB C E ^ TQM
\7] ^ ^ ^etiov^^-5- TQM*
T Q M *
. TQM ^
- TQM ^ l ^ TQSR(Total Quality System Review)S $X
TQM*
- 57 -
9X°] Quality Council
T Q M *
*r QuaUty Council^
«*Hfe- TQM
. o] ^ 3 . 1 1 ^ ^-eife- TQM
Quality
Quality Council* ^ ^ l ^ ^ - ^ j ^ TQM
7M
- TQM
TQM ^ 1 - ^
TQM*
T Q M *
TQM ^-ai- ^^^l-^t-11, o]
- 58 -
ABB
ABB CEAR
(2)
7}x)5L SX^r.
ABB TQSR(Total Quality System Review) ^1 (GuideUne)<Hl
&
- 59 -
- ?!-3*r€ (Human Resources)
- Process Management
& Operational Results
- Supply Management
- Time Based Management
Problem Solving)
(3)
1- 7lcfl
TQM
^ ^ * A|-g-«j)oJ: ^-cf. Jg7l-i4 -g-^ofl tfl*V S ^ - ^ ^ ^ TQM*}-
- 60 -
(4)
51
- ^^(Manufacturing)
- Supply Management
Handbook^
^ 1 Stl*H ^ ^ - ^ 2 1 711^5] a * ^ ^ - ^ ^ ^ - 7 1 ^ § H Metrics* A)-g-*Vc1-.
Metrics* 4-8-3-Hr ^S.^ # c l J 1 ^ - ^ O ] J I 7flAi^ Metrics
^ ABB
ABB p
o ] a | ^ Metrics^
••l^^^i lO-Ups^j
Field Quality - On-Time Delivery
Cycle Time Reduction - Internal Process Quality
Cost of Nonconformance - aL^-H-^V^] ^r
Supplier Quality - Supplier On-time Delivery
- 61 -
- Supplier Cycle Time Reduction
ABB CEAj-7]- 2.2.2-14
Planning forQuality
Organizing forQuality
Monitoring forQuality
r • 1. Identify Output
-- — -p ~ - - -
5. ^A^s
7. «a**u*si *w
Yes
" .. No ProblemSolving
1 o1 • °
9. Streamline(<a^ ^f-S)-)
10. S. -2i}- ^ Recycle
Plan
Do
Check
A r t
2.2.2-1 ABB
- 62 -
(5)
cfl^-8:
Conformance
Responsiveness
-f
(7)-)
- 63 -
el ofl
5?
f. 0RNL(0ak Ridge National Laboratory)
ORNL-gr
67l|5l
- 64 -
oflM^l^(Department of Energy )3
ifafl.fi. £ofl ¥ i $&. °1 TT l-fi- i-i- ^ J i ^ DOE Order 5700.6B«Hl NQA-1
DOE Order 5700.6C£r TQM
i ^ iO7fl &_±s, ^ ^ s l o ] ^ 4 . DOE ^ ^ 10 CFR(Code of Federal
Regulations)^: ^ r ^ l ^ ? ! : ^-§-S>JL DOE S.& ER-6001-92
(1)
. ORNLS1
fe ^ ^ ^ 3.711
Hl#°l 35 - 45
45-55 ) |
- 65 -
(2) 0RNL3
-8-8-
^71-
. ORNL^g-
- 66 -
, %&•$. ^-u] gj ^ . ^ ^ ^ . u i i ^ ^ i . 7ii-a*i-5aci-
(3)
711 ^ A i ofl
TIT . l -r i - .1A l t l
- 67 -
(4)
si-. Defense Nuclear Agency
DNA(Defense Nuclear Agency)fil TQM
TQM ^
TQM
6|6U cfl *V
TQM ^«l a A ] - ^ * 4 ^ * W TQM^l cfl«]: ^l«fl^^l^- DNA«»fl
•S- i ^ £ ^ - § H -£€- DNA «a^«-*-S- ^«3r TQM
- 68 -
(1) DNA
systemH
TQM*
^ 94 TQM
DNA
Operatorl-5.
l^ , Integrated Nuclear Survivability,
^ ^ ^ Consultant *«>1 5fl^. «^ll ^ r « l ^ i 5U^ ^ ^ 1 " 37)| 14
, R & D ^ s | , Test,
(2) DNA
- 69 -
^.c^, TQM<>11 Director, Line Executives, Line Managers^.
(3) TQM
O . ^ , TQM
TQM
TQM 2.2.2-1:4
2.2.2-1 DNAS] TQM
1988-d 8€
1988>d 9 3
1988>d l l €
1988\i 12^
1989V1 4 ^
1989k! 5 ^
1989V1 6€
TQM *\ -g g 3 $ ^ ^ 2:A}-
TQM-I: ^ £ ^ ? K ^ ^ ^
^*W^ ^^
TQM ^l^-^-Ai >g^
- 70 -
• § • *
ive Committee)
TQM
% • $
TQM
Executive Committee
Line Executive TQM
QualityCouncil
QualityCouncil
TQM Support Office
Coordinator -
Coordinator -
Coordinator
TQM(Senior Line Executives)
Pilot TeamAcquisition and
Contracting
Pilot Team
Civilian PersonnelAcqusition
2.2.2-2 DNA^
- 71 -
(4) TQM
DNA7>
SIEMENS
1950^
2.2.2-321- ^ J l A 2.2.2-2^-
QualityControl
1950 1970
Quality
Assurance
1990
TotalQuality
Management
2.2.2-3
- 72 -
3. 2.2.2-2
Quality Control
- Final inspection
1950
Quality Assurance
- #-7H€* 91 ^ I ^ J ^ ^ - M
1970
Total Quality Management
: HH"™'**1990
Jit|-
2.2.2-4^
2.2.2-4
- 73 -
(1) SIEMENSAl-71-
TQM
(2) TQM
Business Unit Europe(KWU)^ ^ -^S lo f l ^^ TQM
ir TQM^l-
1990^0)]
1992V!
1993Vl°ll TQM S i ^ B .
- 74
2.2.2-5*1-
Top Down
7\
Suggestionscheme
\
* « . ^
Bottom Up
2.2.2-5 TQM
UO2 peUet
- 75 -
1994^ S ^ 7 W ^ 1 ^ - ^ - Restructing^-
AS. 1994^^^ ^Z-^xW ^-^7fl^AlH4 KWU
(Business Unit EuropeHH^I TQM«^ ifl^- ^ T 2 - ^ ! - ?h*<H «^l ^ J I ^ ^ ^ -
* 1996^ ^-E] ^ . ^ ^ 0 . 5 . ^^^il S><8«V^J1 *Ka 5U^. 1995^
TQM-g-
Restructuring^ 3 jJL^^^l^ Workshop
Workshop^lAi
SIMENS^
^r^V5^^ QQ* -¥-<^*ri ^ ^ 7 1 ^ , A ^ ^ ^ , ^a*«fl 91
Crossfunctional ^ H ^ ^ l ! ^ ^ 4 ^ ^
SIEMENS^
SIEMENSAH^
- 76 -
SIMENS7]-
nflg- "Short Curcuit"
5Ucf.
4^741
SIMENS
SIMENS^
TQM*
Plan, Do, Check, Action^
GE Electronic Services
of quality and technology)*H
TQM-i- ^1*3. $X°-*\, TQM*
- 77 -
2.2.2-64 $
5tW
quality manager)^
GE Electronic ServicesSection Manager
Manager of Quality andTechnology
DistrictService
Manager
InformationSystemsSpecialist
NationalQuality
Manager
TechnicalEngineer
DistrictTransportation
Manager
QualityRepresentative
QualityRepresentative
2.2.2-6
- 78 -
i SfJI
GE Electronic serviceA>5l
- 79 -
- GE Electronic serviceAf
ity Representative)
ity Inspector)
A]
- GE Electronic serviced
(1)
5U
(7]-) Service facilities
- 81 -
. o]
"fl-rf
(Manager of quality and technology)^ ^ £ ^ •£?]•§•
quaUty manager)^:
Deviation
GE Electronic serviced
- 82 -
TQM-g-
J M * * 41*1 *M QA ##*1- ^ #*)*H tfl«V< TQM
TQM
^ o l ojji, TQM
TQM
Al.
A2.
A3.
A4. ^^l-Tll^ife Total Quality Management(TQM)^-
A5.
7}. AA^r^A V^ T4.
- 83 -
2.
B6. EHi^ - fc^ «15L«]
B7' *1»* *€^M
B8. • f - ^ ^ ^ r ^TF 1
B9. ^H^f l * !^ 85%-c-
BIO. #^«l-8-^r *$&
Bll. *H1-# 12* Al<S
B12. # ^ - -A-j -fe-
B13. ^-tlJl^sl ^.^-z
B14. #^^1 ^-2]^: J !
B15. ^ « l l^^- ^r S
B16. 3}3!S} ^ -^^ r^ -
^ ^ 7441 Til ^3} 51 1 ^ ^ 1 - .
. ^
& ^r 5U <1 °1-Mi2.( ) ( )
<1 °1-M^.
41 °1-1--1-0-
41 ° 1 - M i
c i °1-M .2.
- 84 -
="85^
B23. ^ 4 : %•£&$
B24. KAERI 7\ <£±
B25. $\£\ - g - a l l ^ i
B26. Wfe #^#^1
B27. -g-l!#*)-^ 313)
B28. -fl*}-^ 'S-T-0!!
]M^> ?
; ,„. ,„ }
* » t^ ^ j - ^*- O^
— id O ^1 Wl
, J .tJ 0 | ^L
t l f l Till "—- ^^ < >
- 86 -
3.
C3Z IIT£« ***%7*llC33. cf-1- -¥•*!?}•£) ^^V J2.^°l ^ °]-T-<H
C34. ^r^^l-al Sife- ^-r-^1 • S ^ 0 ] ^liflS.
C36' « ? > ^ T B J £ f e " ^
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
" 1 ^ 1 i ^Fl / yy| / fcjJ 1_-f* > s l 4Fi L""r ^ r ^ ^ ^ *^f nFl
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
I 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
- 87 -
C38. =1
C39. 1VI
c
C40. *t
C42. i
1
C43. %
C44. <*o
C45. %
C46. <£
WM -«<W* safe I U U W ^
M M 5 ! < ^ - ? - ^ ^ ^ - § - ^S]s1-31
^ ^Q?i\7\ Qo^i-^JL $H.^^\^ ?
j-r- n 1 - ^ ? } ^ ! Teamwork0! ^ °l-f-
1 d ^* *U -^- "7l "Xl-'7l./sl rtl T"l_ —1j=_~—- OH —r— y | o r - v r ^ l jji *-T"_LL
I^^M^- ?
I'T'^r^'e" ^ ^ ^ 9X ?\] °TL'Q'&[3 9XQ
I 2 3 4 5 6
1 2~:—3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
oH. *tf a^l ZL$4 W ^ W1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
33 t>« n*1 zi^4 ^ ^ 4 o> ^1 2 3 4 5 6
33 m i ? Si4 ^4 4^ ^41 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
- 88 -
4.
D47. <3 -^r^xkQ JL^?-*}*^ ^~g-^.j7. 5$
D48. *9 •T"ir^'^l'7}' <BJT"'T"^!^31'<*fl ?H*r*l"
D49. ^ - . - ^ ^ ^ 7 m o . £ 1 * * * 3
D50. ^•T"(^"TL/^V'9) "Sr*^^ . S . ^ " ^ ^ TT Q
D51. J\t>\2] ^^ofl tfl^- ? > ^ i ^ <Hi=. ^£ <yq^ ?
D52. ^«W>ife ^ ^ ^ S ««*Wfe
D53. fl*W>H H ^ f e ^ « - « * 3 |01 ^ ^ ^ ?
D54. « « § > J I ^ ^ ^ ^ +w±
«\± ^ **mw* ?
D55. W*IW ^ * J ^ ^ < a ^ 7 M tfl*V
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
! 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 1 f3 ~ * . • - *1 • 1 f "*T ~ * —1 ^* r I ^ —1
1 2 3 4 5 6
- 89 -
D56. M m a «fc **4 4* «*
D57. Tfl HR*! ^ 8 4 f e •S-T- l- - r °1— 'S
• H I t f l ^ O^T,, AS^Ag^^ ?
D59. ^i*wiAi * « * M L safe <a^^i > 8 ^
1 2 3 4 5 6
4*tt* a* 111* * * • * * *1 2 3 4 5 6
• * « 3^ a$4 ^ =- ^1 2 3 4 5 6
^ »4 ZL*1 a^cf «4 o>- ^1 2 3 4 5 6
5.
E60. TQM-S- o)6\]
«K
- 90 -
E61.
37(1
Aoj, TQM
6. TQM
F62.
F63.
7K
1)
2)
- 91 -
F64.
2,
^ 1 ^ 4, > 8
7\.
P65. TQM g-
^ ^ s TQMofl ^ - a * ^ H # H^^-t)-. ( )
7.
G66.
- 92 -
G67.
G68.
7>.
14.
( %) ^ ^ ^ ^ ( %)
G69.
G70. - f ^ ^ ^ - ^ 7 1 - TQM4- S.SJ^:^ ^ ^ S i ^ f -^^M^- ^^-<^ TQM
TQM-i-
- 93 -
TQM
G71.
8. TQM
H72. 7 ^ ^ ^ ^ . 5 . 5 . TQM
7K
H73.
7K
t}-.
f. Self-study
H74. Q A ^
- 94 -
'96\1 « 1 * PBS(Project Base System) E ^ j i
5 fe TQM(Total Quality
Management)^-
QA ^ ^ ^ - A ^ 5J QA
TQM g- M t t "I,
TQM
TQM"]
- 95 -
TQM
TQM $H
TQM
TQM
7]cflsl5iT=i
DNA(Defense Nuclear Agency)^
TQM ^41-e- fl «• ^71, ^71, ^-71^ Tfl « ^ ^ * H TQM^-
TQM
-fA3ajo.
- 96 -
-as*
«flo):
T Q M
1994>d Paton^] FORTUNE 5007fl 7)<$4r cjj-^.5.5. TQM
^2]-oll i 4 ^ ^ ^ 1 20%?V<>1
TQM «€«?!-£: ^ ' f l ,
TQM ^ ^ « n #*> -
, TQM
- 97 -
31
1. "TQCflH TQM -S.", *H-££fl3, 1993.
2. nmm, "w^w, ^^h 1993.3. Larry Wayne Johnston, "The TQM coordinator as change agent in
implementing total quality management", Jun 1989.
4. ##^ f
«|-s]*l fl 22^ ^1 IX, 1993.
5. Paul D. Larson, Ashish Sinha, "The TQM impact : A study of
quality managers' perceptions", 1995.
6. G.K Kanji, "Quality Improvement Methods & Statistical
Reasoning", 1995.
7. "Total Quality Management", A.B.OKorea, 1995.
8. "f-«3 715:-, tf^^FMSW, 1989.
9. "Total Quality Management Toolkit '• Reliability Analysis Center",
1993.
10. William M. Harral, Douglas L. Berg, "Implementing TQM in an
ISO Framework", 1993.
11. f ^ ' S W , LG-EDS *]^D, 1995. 8.
12. #^^«87i|^A].aj|^(D, ^ .q^AV^^) , 1995.
13. # ^ ^ « ^ « ^ , ^i l -^-^(^) , 1995. 8.
14. #^^^7fl^A>3}l(i), Jgfl-Aj. , 1995. 8.
15. KENT J. Truss, "TQM strategy and approach in AECL", 1995.
- 98 -
16. Robert E. Newman, "ABB CE nuclear systems total quality plan",
1995.
17. Max Gildner, "Application of QA in R & D at ORNL", 1995.
18. Defense Nuclear Agency, "Defence Nuclear Agency Total Quality
Management Implementation Plan", 1989.
19. SIEMENS, "Total Quality Management", 1995.
20. GE Electronic Services, "Quality Management Program", 1995.
21. «H0«, " M W , ^ ^ h 1995.
- 99 -
Al -) =S ^ « 4
KAERI/RR-1606/95
I N I S ^ a=
4*/*4 fl^WM 44 * « • W W S * ^ 7fl <39"
yCu - r1 OJ J7J y^ 7 | 7? ^^ j\^- X, f- f I 'Sj /* - - KJ jW ""yl^j \ / Q | ?V ^7 ( j^* JXI fcj i* * Vi|* 1* \ / "5M H OJ
§ tg x]
Bfl O) X] 99 p. £ 1 -n"( 0 ), -T"( )
*<«
3. 7]
'96. 1.
26 Cm
'95 7l-g-^^-4^1
*7| | ( 0 ), iflilHK ), ^ M l ^
^ ^ ^ ^ 7 1 ^
i * (300^01 m^i)
4^«i 51890-95
^ 4 T ! ^ 1 ^ ^ ( 1 0 ^ m*n
BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHEET
Performing Org.Report No.
KAERI/RR-1606/95
Title/Subtitle
Sponsoring org.Report No.
Standard Report No. INIS Subject Code
Development of Total Quality Management Technology for TheEstablishment of Better-Quality R&D System.
Project Manager andDept
Researcher and Dept
Li,Young-Keun Quality Evaluation Dep't
Karp-soon Rheem (QA) / Young-gun Lee, Ho-il Jang, Sung-ki Kim, Jong-suk Kim, Ji-heNam (Quality evaluation) / Hyuk-il Kwon, Nam-jin Lim, Moon-sung Cho, Se-Jin Choi(Quality Plan.)
Pub.place
Page
Note
Classified
Taejon
99 p.
Pub.Org
KAERI
Fig. and Tab. Yes( 0 ), No( )
Pub.date
Size
Jan. 1996
26 Cm
'95 Basic Research Project
Open( o ), Outside( ), Class
Sponsoring Org.
Abstract (About 300 words)
Report Type
Contract No.
Research Report
51890-95
The existing total quality management technology(TGMT) has been surveyed to establish
R & D quality system by upgrading such TGMT and deploying the concept of quality
management.
However, there has been a variety of differences on the quality management environments
beteween R & D institutes in advanced countries and KAERI. So the case studies of quality
management in advanced countries and those in domestic corporations have been analyzed.
Finally, Based upon this analysis, the questionare for all KAERI staff-members has been
drawn up for applying TQM to KAERI.
Subject Keywords (About 10 words)
Quality, Management, Management Tools, R & D quality principle, Quality FunctionDeployment, Process Decision Program Chart