developments in german energy law dörte fouquet, jan ole voß, stefan missling lawyers bbh...

26
Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

Upload: clara-mosley

Post on 25-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

Developments in German Energy Law

Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling

Lawyers BBH

Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

Page 2: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 200833-05/188147.

About us

BBH has been operating as a law firm since 1991. We are a partnership of lawyers, auditors and tax consultants – with

engineers and further experts in our BBH Consulting. A staff of over 400 employees, including more than 200 professionals, are

at your service. We provide advice to more than 3,000 clients. We are the leading law firm for the energy and infrastructure industry. BBH is known as „the“ law firm of public utilities, which we really are. But

we are far more than that, in Germany and in Europe. The decentralized utilities, the industry, investors, intermediaries and

political bodies, like the European Commission, the Federal Government, the Federal States and public corporations and many more appreciate BBH’s work.

Your success is our success. This is something we are proud of.

Page 3: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 300833-05/188147.

Content

Renewable Energy Law Capacity Mechanisms for Conventional Power Plants Financing and Regulating the Grids of the Future

Page 4: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 400833-05/188147.

Energy Concept 2010 / „Energiewende“ 2011

GHG reductions: Aim of minus 40 % until 2020, 55 % until 2030 and minus 80 – 95 % until 2050 (base year 1990)

Renewable Energies: Until 2020 18 %, until 2050 60 % (gross energy consumption). For electricity generation: 35 % by 2020 and 80 % by 2050

Market and Network Integration of Renewable Energies Energy Efficiency (including Energy-efficient restoration

of buildings and use of renewable energy sources) Nuclear Energy: After Fukushima: phasing out until 2022 Mobility

Page 5: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 500833-05/188147.

Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG)

Central pillars of the EEG: Priority grid connection Duty of grid operators to expand grid (and pay

the costs) Feed-in tariffs EEG creates statutory obligations between

installation operator and grid operator; binding law Equalization scheme

Market and system integration of renewable energies Technical requirements Feed-in Management System Services of Wind turbines Market premium and flexibility premium (EEG

2012)

Page 6: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 600833-05/188147.

EEG support mechanism

CUSTOMERS

1

2

3

55

(TGO) 1(TGO) 1

Final supplier

Distribution grid

operator

Third party (Stock

exchange)

Third party (Stock

exchange)

“EEG-Account”4

(TGO) 2(TGO) 2

Page 7: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 700833-05/188147.

Feed-in tariffs

Feed-in tariff depend on energy source and the capacity of installation Wind: Higher initial tariff for a certain period depending on wind

harvest, afterwards basic tariff. Different for onshore, offshore, repowering

Solar: Different for building and open area panels. Heavy reductions in 2010 and 2011.

Biomass: Complex system on different tariffs depending on used biomass

Tariffs for 20 years and year of commissioning Principle of Exclusivity (no co-firing of biomass and fossil fuels) Constitutional protection of the reliance in tariffs for 20 years; retroactive

reduction is generally impermissible Reduction of tarrifs for new installations must be decided by Parliament

Page 8: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 800833-05/188147.

Market premium

Registration Market premium

Electricity supply agreement

TraderTrader

Customer

Grid operator

Grid operator

Renewable energy source

Page 9: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 900833-05/188147.

Outlook – PV-Novelle 2012

Aims: Bringing an end to high installations (7,5 GW in 2011) Reduce the costs for the energy consumers who pay the costs for the

EEG Changes for photovoltaic installations

Sharp cut in the EEG tariffs for new installations: Between 20 and 31 % New tariffs for installation, starting operation 1st of April 2012

Extensive political discussion in Germany Law had passed the parliament (Bundestag), but the federal states

blocked the law in the second chamber (Bundesrat) Compromise has to be found

Page 10: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1000833-05/188147.

Content

Renewable Energy Law Capacity Mechanisms for Conventional Power Plants Financing and Regulating the Grids of the Future

Page 11: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1100833-05/188147.

Investment Dilemma on German Power Generation Market

Page 12: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1200833-05/188147.

Need for new power plants & Missing-Money-Problem

Currently: Overcapacities on power generation market But: In the long run – considerable capacity losses through

shut down of nuclear power plants (20 GW) closure of conventional plants (ca. 20 GW)

Required max capacity remains stable + highly efficient plants necessary for „Energiewende“ as back-up

Missing-Money-Problem low electricity prices and thus no price signals in future: diminishing operation time for conventionals price effects of renewable energies

Page 13: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1300833-05/188147.

Capacities according to Ethical Committe

Loss until 2013

New until 2020

12 GW

80 GW

Maximum capacity

Guaranteed Capacity

2010

3 GWlifetime

8,5 GWNuclear

11,5 GW

7 GW2,5 GW

21,5 GW

20 GW

Nuclear

90 GW

Page 14: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1400833-05/188147.

Capacity Mechanisms as Solution?

Page 15: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1500833-05/188147.

What are capacity mechanisms?

payment for capacities

and not only for energy

new design ofbalancing energy

markets

new payment model

central determinationof capacity

needsstrategic reserve

governmentalpayments

obligation for powerproducers

Page 16: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1600833-05/188147.

Current Status of Discussion

Economists still split on necessity of mechanisms But: German Government is working on proposal

BNetzA: situation in electricity grid in the winter of 2011/2012 was severely strained

BMWi: assignment of institute to examine necessity of capacity mechanisms

EWI-proposal for new market design: Versorgungssicherheitsverträge (security of supply contracts)

Page 17: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1700833-05/188147.

Legal Issues concerning Capacity Mechanisms

Legal questions arise on three levels EU Law

Directive 2009/72/EC (design of capacity tender) state aid law (design of capacity payments, governmental

payments or cost roll-over) German constitutional law – esp. Art. 14, Art. 12 and Art.

3 GG, e.g., existing plants or new projects? also renewables or only conventionals?

German energy law and environmental law Further need to resolve political and legal questions

Page 18: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1800833-05/188147.

Content

Renewable Energy Law Capacity Mechanisms for Conventional Power Plants Financing and Regulating the Grids of the Future

Page 19: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 1900833-05/188147.

Framework until 2009: Cost-based Grid Fee Approval

„Cost-plus-regulation“

Refund of the operating and capital costs required for the reliable grid operation plus return on equity

Grid fees are based on company‘s individual costs

Advantage: reliable investment potentials Disadvantage: no incentive for the increase of

productivity („Averch-Johnson-Effect”)

Page 20: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2000833-05/188147.

Framework since 2009: Regulated Revenue Caps

„Incentive regulation“

Revenue caps are set for five years („regulation period“) Hybrid system: revenue caps based on individual costs (plus

efficiency parameter) Principle: no adjustment of revenues to change in costs

Advantage: incentive for cost reduction (additional cost reductions cause extraordinary margin)

Disadvantage: risk of missing investments in the grid infrastructure for financial reasons

Page 21: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2100833-05/188147.

Revenue Caps of the Second Regulation Period

controllable cost

components

Revenue cap at the beginning of the

2nd regulation period

permanently non-

controllable cost

components

Revenue cap at the end of the

2nd regulation period

reduction of inefficiencies

reduction by the sectoral productivity growth (Xgen):

1.5 % p. a.

no reduction

temporarily non-

controllable cost

components

temporarily non-

controllable cost

components

permanently non-

controllable cost

components

inefficient costs

2013/2014 2017/2018

efficient costs

Page 22: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2200833-05/188147.

Return on Equity – Incentive for Investments?

Return on equity = margin for operating the network

Determined by the BNetzA (= competent authority) for each regulation period

„New Assets“ „Old Assets“ (before 2006)

1st regulation period

9.29% 7.56%

2nd regulation period

9.05% (-0.24%) 7.14% (-0.42%)

Page 23: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2300833-05/188147.

Necessary Investments (in short and long term!) Assumptions of the German „Energy Concept“

Considerable increase of electricity generation in offshore and in coastal regions;

Many decentralised generation plants producing electricity from e.g. PV and biomass will feed into the grids of DSOs;

Based on the geographical position, Germany will increasingly take part in the exchange of electricity within Europe.

Assumed necessary investments for the integration of renewable energies in Germany: up to € 27 billion!

Additional investments relating to „smart grids”?

Page 24: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2400833-05/188147.

How to improve the investment climate?

Expanding the catalogue of permanently non-controllable costs in § 11 Abs. 2 ARegV: investments for the integration of renewable energies investments for the implementation of smart grids

Adjustment of the German efficiency benchmark („Effizienzvergleich“): costs concerning investments in renewable energies or smart grids

should no longer be „inefficient“ Investment budget: equal treatment of TSOs and DSOs Further development of the „quality regulation“ Additional „output factors“ for the determination of revenue caps Extension of the regulation periods Implementation of “CAPEX regulation”

Page 25: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

AEEC Summer Camp24.08.2012 2500833-05/188147.

Capex Regulation = „Smarter“ Regulation?

„operating costs”

basic and operational costs

„capital costs“

imputed depreciation

return on equity

cost of debt capital

imputed trade tax

OPEX (with efficiency parameter)

CAPEX (without e.p.)

Page 26: Developments in German Energy Law Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan Missling Lawyers BBH Meisenheim, 24 August 2012

Thank you for your attention!

BBH BerlinMagazinstraße 15-1610179 BerlinTel.: 030 611 28 40 0Fax: 030 611 28 40 [email protected]

BBH KölnKAP am SüdkaiAgrippinawerft 3050678 KölnTel.: 0221 6 50 25 0Fax: 0221 6 50 25 [email protected]

BBH StuttgartIndustriestraße 370565 StuttgartTel.: 0711 722 47 0Fax: 0711 722 47 [email protected]

BBH MünchenPfeuferstraße 781373 MünchenTel.: 089 23 11 64 0Fax: 089 23 11 64 [email protected]

BBH BrüsselAvenue Marnix 281000 Brüssel/BelgienTel.: +32 2 204 44 00 Fax.: +32 2 204 44 99 [email protected]

www.bbh-online.dewww.DerEnergieblog.de

Contacts: Dörte Fouquet, Jan Ole Voß, Stefan MisslingLawyers BBH