dfid spend data

8/7/2019 DFID Spend Data

1/29

Africa

Asia

Middle East

Other Areas

THE WORLD

RATIOS

% BILATERAL aid spent on poor countries - LICs

(millions) countries

MICs

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Not Free byFreedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Partly Free byFreedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Free by FreedomHouse (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Fragile under theFragile States Index

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high commitment topoverty reduction (average CPIA score 5-6 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium highcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIA score 4-5 out of6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium commitment topoverty reduction (average CPIA score 3-4 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low commitment topoverty reduction (average CPIA score 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high corruption under theCorruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International(2010) (score of 2.9/10 and below)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium corruption underthe Corruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International(2010) (score of 3.0-4.9 out of 10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low corruption under theCorruption Perceptions Index as per Transparency International(2010) (score of 5.0/10 and above)


2/29

1,680,000 1,891,000 1,995,000 2,343,000 2,428,000 58%

1,017,000 1,098,000 1,110,000 1,377,000 1,406,000 35%

134,000 155,000 155,000 165,000 178,000 5%

79,000 62,000 112,000 111,000 111,000 3%

2,910,000 3,206,000 3,372,000 3,996,000 4,123,000 100%

AFRICA

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 10/11

316.29 316.29 316.3 316.3 316.3 904.8

4.12 4.57 4.84 5.73 5.99 0.87

81% 80% 80% 78% 79% 44%

19% 20% 20.5% 22% 21% 56%

44% 45% 45% 45% 48% 28%

49% 49% 49% 49% 47% 43%

7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 29%

70% 73% 73% 76% 76% 64%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%

77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 54%

23% 23% 23% 23% 23% 41%

80% 81% 81% 83% 83% 72%

20% 19% 19% 17% 17% 28%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

DFID BilateralProgramme(exclHumanitarianAssistance)10/11 ('000)





DFID BilateralProgramme(exclHumanitarianAssistance)10/11 (%)


3/29

59% 59% 59% 59%

34% 33% 34% 34%

5% 5% 4% 4%

2% 3% 3% 3%

100% 100% 100% 100%

ASIA

11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

904.8 904.8 904.8 904.8

0.94 0.96 1.23 1.26

45% 46% 47% 46%

55% 54% 53% 54%

24% 23% 19% 18%

49% 50% 59% 62%

27% 28% 22% 21%

69% 69% 77% 79%

0% 0% 0% 0%

3% 2% 1% 1%

54% 55% 53% 52%

43% 43% 46% 47%

74% 74% 79% 80%

26% 26% 21% 20%

0% 0% 0% 0%






4/29

Country

Africa South of Angola

Africa South of Burkina Faso

Africa South of BurundiAfrica South of Cameroon

Africa South of Cape Verde

Africa South of Chad

Africa South of Congo (Dem Rep)

Africa South of Ethiopia

Africa South of Gambia

Africa South of Ghana

Africa South of Guinea

Africa South of Kenya

Africa South of Lesotho

Africa South of Liberia

Africa South of Malawi

Africa South of Mozambique

Africa South of Niger

Africa South of Nigeria

Africa South of Rwanda

Africa South of Senegal (information removed because it is in a net repayment position)

Africa South of Sierra Leone

Africa South of South Africa

Africa South of Tanzania

Africa South of Uganda

Africa South of Zambia

Subtotal South of Sahara countries (complete info)

Total poverty headcount of South of Sahara countries (consisting of 43 countries with data, ex

Africa South of ZimbabweAfrica South of Somalia

Africa South of St Helena & Dependencies

Africa South of Sudan

Subtotal South of Sahara countries (incomplete info)

Total South of Sahara countries

Africa South of East African Community

Africa South of Southern Africa

Africa South of South of Sahara regional

Africa North of SNorth of Sahara Regional

Africa Africa regiAfrica regionalTotal Regional Communities

TOTAL AFRICA

TOTAL WORLD

Continent

Sub-continent


5/29

ADDITIONAL DATA

RATIOS


[2] Source: Bilateral Aid Review: Technical Report (DFID, 2011)

[3] Low income countries are countries with 2009 gross national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World B

[4] Source: The Failed States Index 2010 (The Fund For Peace, 2010) found at: http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/inde

[5] Source: Freedom in the World 2010 (Freedom House, 2010) found at: http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?

[6] Source: Latest figures from the World Development Indicators

[8] Poverty headcount of Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan appears low against a poverty headcount of 36.1% and 43.1% of th

[10Collier, P. (2007) The Bottom Billion

[13Source: DFID (2011) found at: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Spending-Review-2010

[14Average of CPIA gender equality rating; building human resources rating; equity of public resource use; social prot[15% taken as a proportion of total bilateral aid spend to countries only.

[16Calculations based on bilateral aid to countries with complete information on the indicator in question.

[17 Source: Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 (Transparency International, 2010)

(millions) recipient countries

billion - MICs% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Not Freeby Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as PartlyFree by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Free byFreedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Fragileunder the Fragile States Index

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with highcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIA score 5-6 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium highcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIA score 4-5 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with mediumcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIA score 3-4 out of 6)[14]% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with lowcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIA score 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with high corruptionunder the Corruption Perceptions Index as perTransparency International (2010) (score of 2.9/10 andbelow)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with mediumcorruption under the Corruption Perceptions Index as perTransparency International (2010) (score of 3.0-4.9 out of10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with low corruptionunder the Corruption Perceptions Index as per

Transparency International (2010) (score of 5.0/10 andabove)


6/29

Lower midMIC

Low inco LIC

12,000 10,000 Low inco LICLower midMIC

Lower midMIC

Low inco LIC

133,000 147,000 165,000 220,000 258,000 Low inco LIC

241,000 290,000 300,000 345,000 390,000 Low inco LIC

Low inco LIC

85,000 85,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 Low inco LIC

Low inco LIC

86,000 100,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 Low inco LIC

Lower midMIC

10,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Low inco LIC

72,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 98,000 Low inco LIC

88,000 80,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 Low inco LIC

Low inco LIC

141,000 180,000 210,000 305,000 305,000 Lower midMIC

70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 Low inco LIC

54,000 58,000 58,000 77,000 77,000 Low inco LIC

17,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Upper mi MIC

150,000 150,000 160,000 165,000 168,000 Low inco LIC

90,000 100,000 105,000 95,000 90,000 Low inco LIC

53,000 55,000 55,000 62,000 63,000 Low inco LIC

1,302,000 1,447,000 1,530,000 1,811,000 1,893,000

85% 85% 85% 85% 86%

ludes 11 countries without data)

70,000 80,000 84,000 94,000 95,000 Low inco LIC26,000 44,000 46,000 80,000 80,000 Low inco LIC

Not classi Not classi

132,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 Lower midMIC

228,000 264,000 270,000 314,000 315,000

15% 15% 15% 15% 14%

1,530,000 1,711,000 1,800,000 2,125,000 2,208,000

91% 90% 90% 91% 91%





150,000 180,000 195,000 218,000 220,000 Not classi Not classi150,000 180,000 195,000 218,000 220,000

9% 10% 10% 9% 9%

1,680,000 1,891,000 1,995,000 2,343,000 2,428,000

52% 59% 62% 73% 76%

3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000

DFID BilateralProgramme(exclHumanitarianAssistance)10/11 ('000)[2]





Incomegroup(Jan 11)[3]

Incomegroup(Jan 11)


7/29

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Total / De

316.3 316.3 316.3 316.3 316.3 Subtotal

4.12 4.57 4.84 5.73 5.99 Subtotal

81% 80% 80% 78% 79% [16] Total

19% 20% 21% 22% 21% [16] Total

44% 45% 45% 45% 48% [16] Total

49% 49% 49% 49% 47% [16] Total

7% 6% 6% 6% 5% [16] Total

70% 73% 73% 76% 76% [16] Total

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Only

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Only

77% 77% 77% 77% 77% [16] Only

23% 23% 23% 23% 23% [16] Only

80% 81% 81% 83% 83% [16] Total

20% 19% 19% 17% 17% [16] Total

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% [16] Total

ank Atlas method, equals $995 or less. Source: World Bank (2011)

.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=452&Itemid=900

page=276

e population living below national poverty lines, respectively (UNDP, 2010).

ection rating; policies for social inclusion/equity.


8/29

Yes Non-FCA NF 2.88 1.9 7.8

Yes FCA PF 3.62 3.1 7.3

Yes FCA PF 3.36 1.8 6.2Yes FCA NF 3.12 2.2 5.3

No Non-FCA F 4.46 5.1 0.1

Yes FCA NF 2.48 1.7 5.8

Yes FCA NF 2.86 2 36.0

Yes FCA NF 3.72 2.7 29.1

Yes Non-FCA PF 3.26 3.2 0.5

Yes Non-FCA F 3.98 4.1 6.7

Yes FCA PF 3.1 2 6.2

Yes FCA PF 3.5 2.1 7.1

Yes Non-FCA PF 3.36 3.5 0.8

Yes FCA PF 2.6 3.3 3.0

Yes FCA PF 3.5 3.4 9.8

Yes Non-FCA PF 3.36 2.7 14.8

Yes FCA PF 3.12 2.6 8.6

Yes FCA PF 3.24 2.4 88.6

Yes Non-FCA NF 3.98 4 6.1

Yes FCA PF 3.22 2.4 2.5

No Non-FCA F 4.5 11.5

No Non-FCA PF 3.74 2.7 30.2

Yes FCA PF 3.76 2.5 14.8

Yes Non-FCA PF 3.5 3 7.4

316.3

357.5

Yes FCA NF 1.52 2.4 Yes FCA NF 1.1

No Not classified Not classi Not classifi

Yes FCA NF 2.36 1.6

ied Not classified Not classified





Collier'sBottomBillion[10]

FCA/ Non-FCA (FSI2010)[4]

FreedomHouse2011[5]

CPIAscore[6]

CorruptionPerceptions Index[17]

Povertyheadcount(millions)[6]


9/29

ominator

outh of Sahara countries (complete info)

outh of Sahara countries (complete info)

South of Sahara countries, excluding St Helena which is not classified






countries with complete CPIA information, so excludes South Africa, Somalia and St Helena (and Senegal)








10/29


11/29


12/29

Continent Country

Asia South Asia Bangladesh

Asia South Asia India

Asia South Asia Nepal

Asia South Asia Pakistan

Asia South Asia Sri Lanka

Asia Far East Asia Cambodia

Asia Far East Asia China

Asia Far East Asia Indonesia

Asia Far East Asia Laos

Asia Far East Asia Mongolia

Asia Far East Asia Philippines

Asia Far East Asia Thailand

Asia Far East Asia Vietnam

Asia Central Asian R Kyrgyzstan

Asia Central Asian R Tajikistan

Subtotal Asia (complete info)

Total poverty headcount of Asian countries (consisting of 19 countries with data, exclu

Asia South Asia Afghanistan

Asia South Asia Burma

Asia South Asia Maldives

Subtotal Asia (incomplete info)

Total Asia countries

Asia South Asia South & Central Asia

Asia Asia Regional Asia Regional

Total Regional Communities

TOTAL ASIA

TOTAL WORLD

ADDITIONAL DATA

RATIOS


Sub-continent

The absolute number of poor people in recipientcountries (millions)

BILATERAL aid spent/numbers living in poverty inrecipient countries

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries of the newbottom billion - MICs

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as NotFree by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)


13/29

[2] Source: Bilateral Aid Review: Technical Report (DFID, 2011)

[3] Low income countries are countries with 2009 gross national income (GNI) per capita, calculated using the World Ba

[4] Source: The Failed States Index 2010 (The Fund For Peace, 2010) found at: http://www.fundforpeace.org/web/index.

[5] Source: Freedom in the World 2010 (Freedom House, 2010) found at: http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?p

[6] Source: Latest figures from the World Development Indicators

[8] Poverty headcount of Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan appears low against a poverty headcount of 36.1% and 43.1% of the

[10]Collier, P. (2007) The Bottom Billion

[13]Source: DFID (2011) found at: http://www.dfid.gov.uk/Media-Room/News-Stories/2010/Spending-Review-2010

[14]Average of CPIA gender equality rating; building human resources rating; equity of public resource use; social prote

[15]% taken as a proportion of total bilateral aid spend to countries only.

[16]Calculations based on bilateral aid to countries with complete information on the indicator in question.

[17] Source: Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 (Transparency International, 2010)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as PartlyFree by Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as "Freeby Freedom House (civil and political freedoms)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries listed as Fragileunder the Fragile States Index

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with highcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIAscore 5-6 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with medium highcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIAscore 4-5 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with mediumcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIAscore 3-4 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with lowcommitment to poverty reduction (average CPIAscore 0-3 out of 6)[14]

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with highcorruption under the Corruption Perceptions Index asper Transparency International (2010) (score of 2.9/10and below)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with mediumcorruption under the Corruption Perceptions Index as

per Transparency International (2010) (score of 3.0-4.9 out of 10)

% BILATERAL aid spent on countries with lowcorruption under the Corruption Perceptions Index asper Transparency International (2010) (score of 5.0/10and above)


14/29

157000 200000 210000 290000 300000 Low inco LIC No

280000 280000 280000 280000 280000 Lower mi MIC No

57000 60000 60000 100000 103000 Low inco LIC Yes

215000 267000 267000 412000 446000 Lower mi MIC No

Lower mi MIC No

16000 10000 9000 4000 Low inco LIC Yes

Lower mi MIC No

9000 10000 20000 15000 5000 Lower mi MIC No

Low inco LIC Yes

Lower mi MIC Yes

Lower mi MIC No

Lower mi MIC No

50000 28000 21000 14000 7000 Lower mi MIC No

Low inco LIC Yes

Low inco LIC Yes

784,000 855,000 867,000 1,115,000 1,141,000

79% 80% 80% 83% 83%

es 5 countries without data, excludes the Middle East)

178000 178000 178000 178000 178000 Low inco LIC Yes

32000 36000 36000 55000 58000 Low inco LIC Yes

Lower mi MIC No

210,000 214,000 214,000 233,000 236,000

21% 20% 20% 17% 17%

994,000 1,069,000 1,081,000 1,348,000 1,377,000

98% 97% 97% 98% 98%

15000 14000 14000 14000 14000 Not classiNot classified

8000 15000 15000 15000 15000 Not classiNot classified

23,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,0002% 3% 3% 2% 2%

1,017,000 1,098,000 1,110,000 1,377,000 1,406,000

32% 34% 35% 43% 44%

3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000 3,206,000

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Total / Denominat

904.8 904.8 904.8 904.8 904.8 Subtotal Asia (com

0.87 0.94 0.96 1.23 1.26 Subtotal Asia (com

44% 45% 46% 47% 46% [15] Total Asia cou

56% 55% 54% 53% 54% [15] Total Asia cou

28% 24% 23% 19% 18% [15] Total Asia cou






Incomegroup(Jan 11)[3]

Incomegroup(Jan11)

Collier'sBottomBillion[10]


15/29


16/29

FCA PF 3.72 2.4 76.0

Non-FCA F 3.74 3.3 455.8

FCA PF 3.75 2.2 14.7

FCA PF 2.88 2.3 35.2

FCA PF 3.86 3.2 2.6

Non-FCA NF 3.36 2.1 3.7

Non-FCA NF 3.5 207.6

Non-FCA F 3.67 2.8 66.1

Non-FCA NF 3.28 2.1 2.5

Non-FCA F 3.60 2.7 0.1

Non-FCA PF 2.4 19.7

Non-FCA PF 3.5 1.3

Non-FCA NF 4.10 2.7 18.0

Non-FCA PF 3.72 2 0.2

Non-FCA NF 3.48 2.1 1.4

905

917.7

FCA NF 2.62 1.4

FCA NF 1.4

Non-FCA PF 3.76 2.3

Not classifiedNot classified

Not classifiedNot classified

r

plete info)

plete info)

ntries

ntries

ntries

FCA/ Non-FCA (FSI2010)[4]

FreedomHouse2011[5]

CPIA score[6]

CorruptionPerceptions Index[17]

Povertyheadcount(millions)[6]


17/29

ntries

ntries

ntries

with complete CPIA information, so excludes Burma, China, Phillippines and Thailand.




ntries

ntries

ntries


18/29


19/29


20/29


21/29


22/29

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

90%100%

MIC v LIC split

"Poor

countries - LICs"

Countrie

s of thenewbottombillion -MICs

%

ghmmitnteragPIA

ore 5-ut of

Mhicom(aesc56)

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Civil and political f

Not Free

PartlyFree

Free%

12345

20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

00%

Hco(Is0

o1

%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Fragile States

Fragilestates

%

101.0

151.0

201.0

251.0

301.0

Millions


23/29


24/29

Commitment to podiumh

mmitnteragPIA

ore 4-ut of

Mediumcommitment(average CPIAscore 3-4 out of6)

Lowcommitment(average CPIAscore 0-3 out of6)

Corruption

ighrrupti

nndexore of2.9

ut of

Mediumcorruption(Indexscore of3.0-4.9

out of10

Lowcorruption(Indexscore of5.0-10

out of10

The absolute numb


25/29

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

BILATERAL aid sp


26/29

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

90%100%

MIC v LIC split

Poor

countries - LICs

Countrie

s of thenewbottombillion -MICs

%

ghmmitnteragPIA

ore 5-ut of

Mhicom(aesc56)

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Civil and political f

Not Free

PartlyFree

Free%

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

00%

Hco(is0

o1

%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Fragile States

Fragilestates

%

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80


27/29

10/11

11/12

12/13

13/14

14/15

0%

1

-

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

-

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

800.0

The absolute numb

Millions


28/29


29/29

0/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

dfid spend data

Documents