dif fft

23
DIF-FFT Presented by : Aleem Alsanbani Saleem Almaqashi

Upload: saleem-almaqashi

Post on 30-Nov-2014

3.678 views

Category:

Technology


6 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dif fft

DIF-FFT

Presented by :Aleem Alsanbani

Saleem Almaqashi

Page 2: Dif fft

Fast Fourier Transform FFT

- A fast Fourier transform (FFT) is an efficient algorithm to compute the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and inverse of DFT.

- There are many FFT algorithms which involves a wide range of mathematics,. A Discrete Fourier transform decomposes a sequence of values into components of different frequencies.

- This operation is very useful in many fields but computing it directly from the definition is often too slow to be practical .

Page 3: Dif fft

Cont ..

• FFT are special algorithms for speedier implementation of DFT.

• FFT requires a smaller number of arithmetic operations such as multiplications and additions than DFT.

• FFT also requires lesser computational time than DFT .

Page 4: Dif fft

Fast Fourier Transform Algorithms

• Direct computation of the DFT is less efficient because it does not exploit the properties of symmetry and periodicity of the phase factor WN = e-j2π/N  .

• These properties are:

 

- Symmetry property.

- Periodicity property.

• As we already know that all computationally efficient algorithms for DFT are collectively known as FFT Algorithms and these algorithms exploit the above two properties of phase factor, WN.

Page 5: Dif fft

FFT Algorithms Classification Based On Decimation

• Another classification of FFT algorithms based on Decimation of s(n) :r S(K). Decimation means decomposition into decimal parts. On the basis of decimation process, FFT algorithms are of two types: 

• 1. Decimation-in-Time FFT algorithms.

• 2. Decimation-in-Frequency FFT algorithms.                              

Page 6: Dif fft

Cont..

• Decimation-in-Time Algorithms: sequence s(n) will be broken up into odd numbered and even numbered subsequences.

• This algorithm was first proposed by Cooley and Tukey in 1965.

• Decimation-in-Frequency Algorithms. the sequence s(n) will be. Broken up into two equal halves.

• This algorithm was first proposed by Gentlemen and Sande in 1966. 

• Computation reduction factor of FFT algorithms .• Number of computations required for direct DFT / Number of

computations required for FFT algorithm 

•             = N2 / N / 2 log2 (N)

Page 7: Dif fft

decimation-in-frequency FFT algorithm

• In decimation-in-frequency FFT algorithm, the output DFT sequence S(K) is broken into smaller and smaller subsequences. For the derivation of this algorithm, the number of points or samples in a given sequence should be N = 2r where r > 0. For this purpose, we can first-divide the input sequence into the first-half and the second-half of the points.

• Flow graph of complete decimation-in-frequency (DIF) decomposition of an N-point DFT computation (N = 8).

Page 8: Dif fft

Steps for Computation of Decimation in Frequency FFT Algorithm 

• Given below are the important steps for the computation of DIF FFT algorithms.

• 1. Data shuffling is not required but whole sequence is divided in two parts: first half and second half. From these we calculate g(n) and h(n) as follows: 

•                    g(n) = s(n) +s(n+N/2 ) 

• and             h(n) = s(n)-s(n+N/2 )

• where             n  = 0, 1, ..., N/2 -1

     Finally data shuffling is performed. It is also performed by Bit reversal.

 

Page 9: Dif fft

Number Of Complex Multiplications Required In DIF- FFT Algorithm

• Number of complex multiplications required in decimation-m-. FFT algorithm are the same as that required in decimation-in-time FFT algorithm.

• Number of complex multiplication required in these DFT algorithms are N/2 log2iV, where N= 2r, r>0 and N is the total number of points (or samples) in a discrete-time sequence. Thus the total computations (number of multiplication and addition operations) are the same in both FFT algorithms.

• Now we will compare the computational complexity for the direct computation of the DFT and FFT algorithm. This comparison is given in Table

Page 10: Dif fft

Number Of Complex Multiplications Required In DIF- FFT Algorithm

No. of points"or samples)

in a sequences)n), N

  

Complexmultiplication

sin direct

computation of

DFT=NN =A

Complexmultiplication

sin FFT

algorithmsN/2 log2 N = B

SpeedimprovementFactor -A/B

  

22- 4 16 4 4.0=

23- 8 64 12 5.3=

24 - 16 256 32 8.0=

Page 11: Dif fft

First stage of the decimation-in-frequency FFT algorithm..

Page 12: Dif fft
Page 13: Dif fft

Alternate DIT FFT structures

• DIT structure with input natural, output bit-reversed (OSB 9.14):

Page 14: Dif fft

Alternate DIT FFT structures

• DIT structure with input bit-reversed, output natural

Page 15: Dif fft

Radix-2 Decimation-In-Frequency Solved Example Part1

• Example Find the DFT of the following discrete-time sequence .  

•                    s(n) = {1, -1, -1, -1, 1, 1, 1, -1} using Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency FFT algorithm.

• Solution. The Twiddle factor or phase rotation factor WN= involved in the FFT calculation are found out as follows for N= 8.                

Page 16: Dif fft

Example Part1

Page 17: Dif fft

Example Part1

Page 18: Dif fft

Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency Solved Example Part2

• Fig.Flow graph of Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency (DIF) FFT algorithm   N = 8. In Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency (DIF) FFT algorithm, original sequence s(n) is decomposed into two subsequences as first half and second half of a sequence. There is no need of reordering (shuffling) the original sequence as in Radix-2 decimation-in-time (DIT) FFT algorithm. But resultant discrete frequency sequence is shuffled (reordered) into natural order because these are obtained in unnatural order. Flow graph of Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency (DIF) FFT algorithm for N= 8 is shown in Fig. Determination of DFT using Radix-2 DIF FFT algorithm requires three stages because the number of points in a given sequence is 8, i.e., = 2r — N — 8, where r is number of stages required = 3.

Page 19: Dif fft

Solv.Stage I :                        A0 = s(0) + s(4) = 1 + 1 = 2                             A1 = s(l)   + s(5) = -1 + 1 =0              A2 = s(2) + s(6) = -1 + 1 = 0                           A3 = s(3) + s(7) = -1 - 1 = -2                          A4 =  [s(0)+(-1) s(4)] W8

0 = [1 + (-1) (1)]  x 1 =0 A5 =  [s(1) +  (-1) s(5)]W8

1 = [-1 + (-1)(1)]((1-j) /√2= - √2(l - j)                A6 =  [s(2) +  (-1) s(6)]W8

2 = [-1 + (-1) x 1] (- j) =2j                                         

  A7 =  [s(3) +  (-1) s(7)]W83 = [-1 + (-1)(-1)]{(-(1-j) /√2} = 0

Page 20: Dif fft

Solv….

S(K) = {S(0), S(l), S(2), S(3), S(4), S(5), S(6), S(6), S(7)}

Or  S(X) = {0-√2+(2 + √2  )j, 2 -2j √2+(-2 + √2)j,4,

                   √2+ (2 - √2  )j,2 + 2j,- √2  -(2 + √2)7}

Page 21: Dif fft

21

Conclusions

• Radix 22, 24… Structure uses less adders and multipliers but still has good efficiency processing DIF DFT

• Common Factor Algorithm and Butterfly Structure enable this architecture to reuse its modules numerous times

Page 22: Dif fft

22

References

• [1],Shousheng He and Torkelson, M. “A new approach to pipeline FFT processor,” Proceedings of IPPS '96, 15-19, pp766 –770. April 1996

• [2] Alan V.Oppenheim, Ronald W. Schafer, “ Discrete-time signal processing “ 2nd edition

• [3] Zhangde Wang “INDEX MAPPING FOR ONE TO MULTI DIMENSIONS “Electronics Letters Publication Volume: 25, pp: 781-782 Jun 1989

• [4] He, S. & Torkelson, M., A systolic array implementation of common factor algorithm to compute DFT, Proc. Int. Symp. on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Networks, Kanazawa, Japan, pp. 374-381, 1994.

• [5]IJung-YeolOH and Myoung-Seob LIM , ‘Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm for Low-Power and Area-Efficient Implementation’EICETRANS.COMMUN.,VOL.E89–B, APRI

• [6]BURRUS, c. s.: 'Index mappings for multidimensional formulation of the DFT and convolution',IEEE Trans., 1977, ASSP-25, (6), pp. 239-242

Page 23: Dif fft

_________

_____

__