difference between mean daily cwf scenario and the naa ......daily ec plots sdn1-2.xlsx; sdn2 annual...
TRANSCRIPT
Daily EC Plots SDN1-2.xlsx; SDN1 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
4/9/87
3/29/854/8/81
3/28/78
SDN1 Old River at Tracy
Daily EC Plots SDN1-2.xlsx; SDN1 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN1 Old River at Tracy
Daily EC Plots SDN1-2.xlsx; SDN2 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-600.00
-400.00
-200.00
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
4/9/87
3/29/854/8/81
3/28/78
SDN2 Old River 1
Daily EC Plots SDN1-2.xlsx; SDN2 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN2 Old River 1
Daily EC Plots SDN3-4.xlsx; SDN3 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN3 Grant Line Canal
Daily EC Plots SDN3-4.xlsx; SDN3 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN3 Grant Line Canal
Daily EC Plots SDN3-4.xlsx; SDN4 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400.00
-200.00
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN4 Head of Middle River
Daily EC Plots SDN3-4.xlsx; SDN4 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN4 Head of Middle River
Daily EC Plots SDN5-6.xlsx; SDN5 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA3/28/78
SDN5
3/24/78 4/8/78
Middle River at Howard Road Bridge
Daily EC Plots SDN5-6.xlsx; SDN5 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN5 Middle River at Howard Road Bridge
Daily EC Plots SDN5-6.xlsx; SDN6 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN6 Middle River at PO
Daily EC Plots SDN5-6.xlsx; SDN6 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN6 Middle River at PO
Daily EC Plots SDN7-8.xlsx; SDN7 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN7 Tom Paine Slough
Daily EC Plots SDN7-8.xlsx; SDN7 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN7 Tom Paine Slough
Daily EC Plots SDN7-8.xlsx; SDN8 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-120.00
-100.00
-80.00
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN8 San Joaquin River 1
Daily EC Plots SDN7-8.xlsx; SDN8 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-30
-20
-10
0
10
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4
Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN8 San Joaquin River 1
Daily EC Plots SDN9-10.xlsx; SDN9 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN9 San Joaquin River at Brandt Bridge
Daily EC Plots SDN9-10.xlsx; SDN9 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-30
-20
-10
0
10
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN9 San Joaquin River at Brandt Bridge
Daily EC Plots SDN9-10.xlsx; SDN10 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
SDN10 Emmanton
Daily EC Plots SDN9-10.xlsx; SDN10 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
SDN10 Emmanton
Daily EC Plots DB1-DB2.xlsx; DB-1 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB1 Indian Slough at Old River
Daily EC Plots DB1-DB2.xlsx; DB-1 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB1 Indian Slough at Old River
Daily EC Plots DB1-DB2.xlsx; DB-2 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB2 Indian Slough
Daily EC Plots DB1-DB2.xlsx; DB-2 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB2 Indian Slough
Daily EC Plots DB3-DB4.xlsx; DB-3 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB3 Indian Slough at Discovery Bay
Daily EC Plots DB3-DB4.xlsx; DB-3 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB3 Indian Slough at Discovery Bay
Daily EC Plots DB3-DB4.xlsx; DB-4 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB4 Warner Dredger Cut
Daily EC Plots DB3-DB4.xlsx; DB-4 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB4 Warner Dredger Cut
Daily EC Plots DB5-DB6.xlsx; DB-5 Chart1 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB5 Old River US of Indian Slough
Daily EC Plots DB5-DB6.xlsx; DB-5 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB5 Old River US of Indian Slough
Daily EC Plots DB5-DB6.xlsx; DB-6 Chart2 HSI Hydrologic Systems
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
Oct-75 Oct-76 Oct-77 Oct-78 Oct-79 Oct-80 Oct-81 Oct-82 Oct-83 Oct-84 Oct-85 Oct-86 Oct-87 Oct-88 Oct-89 Oct-90 Oct-91
Diff
eren
ce in
Sal
inity
µS/
cm
Axis Title
Difference Between Mean Daily CWF Scenario and the NAA, Site:
Scenario B2
Scenario B1
Positive Value Reflects a Higher CFW Scenario Salinity Than The NAA
DB6 Old River DS of Indian Slough
Daily EC Plots DB5-DB6.xlsx; DB-6 Annual Chart HSI Hydrologic Systems
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Aver
age
Salin
ity C
hang
e (µ
S/cm
)
Water Year
Average Annual Salinity Change For SWF Scenarios As Compared To the NAA, Site:
B1 B2 H3 H4Positive Vaues Represent Salinity Increase Due To The CWF Scenario
Cond
ition
s Are
Bet
ter
Cond
ition
s Are
Wor
se
DB6 Old River DS of Indian Slough