discusses 951218 oversight panel meeting open to public in
TRANSCRIPT
UNITED STATES
CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSI
„REGION IV
611 RYAN PLA2A DRIVE, SUITE 400ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011.8064
JAN I 2 1996
Washington Public Power Supply SystemATTN: J. V. Parrish, Vice President
Nuclear Operations3000 George Washington WayP.O. Box 968, MD 1023Richland, Washington 99352
SUBJECT: PUBLIC MEETING WITH WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM ON
DECEMBER 18, 1995
This refers to the NRC Oversight Panel meeting open to public observationconducted on December 18, 1995„ in, the NRC Region 'IV Office, in Arlington,Texas. This meeting was the third'eeting between the NRC Oversight Panel andthe Washington Public Power- Supply System (Supply System) regarding theoperation of the WNP-2 facility. Attendees at the meet'ing are listed inEnclosure 1 to this letter.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss several areas of the Supply System'sPerformance Enhancement Strategy (PES), which included a general overview,plant operations, engineering, radiation protection, and oversight activities.The discussions provided your perspectives of the status and progress of theinitiatives which are part of the PES. These discussions were beneficial infurthering our understanding of your areas of emphasis. We were interested tohear your perspective on management changes you are making, particularly asthey relate to your desire to strengthen management in the areas yourecognized to have performance problems. We were also interested to hear thatyour management team is giving added focus to the February-March timeframe, aperiod when you have historically suffered from a lapse in performance. Acopy of the slides presented by the Supply System are provided in Enclosure 2.
As discussed in the meeting, the next Oversight Panel meeting is scheduled forFebruary 1996. We will be contacting the Supply System staff to establish thespecific date of the meeting. It is our intention to include as part of thismeeting a discussion of your planned activities related to the springrefueling outage.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy ofthis letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased todiscuss them with you.
Sincerely,
J. E. Dyer, DirectorDivision of Reactor Projects
960i22009i 960ii2PDR ADQCK 05000397P PDR
Washington Public PowerSupply System
Enclosures:1. Attendance List2. Presentation Slides
Docket: 50-397License:'PF-21
cc w/enclosures:Washington Public Power Supply SystemATTN: J. H. Swailes, WNP-2 Plant ManagerP.O. Box 968, MD 927MRichland, Washington 99352-0968
Washington Public Power Supply SystemATTN: Chief Counsel3000 George Washington WayP.O. Box 968, MD 396Richland, Washington 99352-0968
Energy Facility Site Evaluation CouncilATTN: Frederick S. Adair, ChairmanP.O. Box 43172Olympia, Washington 98504-3172
Washington Public Power Supply SystemATTN: D. A. Swank, WNP-2 Licensing ManagerP.O. Box 968 (Mail Drop PE20)Richland, Washington 99352-0968
Washington Public Power Supply SystemATTN: P. R. Bemis, Director
Regulatory and Industry AffairsP.O. Box 968 (Mail Drop PE20)Richland, Washington 99352-0968
Benton County Board of CommissionersATTN: ChairmanP.O. Box 190Prosser, Washington 99350-0190
Winston & StrawnATTN: M. H. Philips, Esq.1400 L Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20005-3502
Washington Public PowerSupply System JAN l 2 l996
Resident InspectorMIS SystemRIV FileBranch Chief (DRP/TSS)M. Hammond (PAO, WCFO)
E-Mail report to D. Nelson (DJN)E-Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
r 2
"-Keg-;to.,;DMB ..(. IE45).,~ ~.-
bcc distrib. by RIV:L. J. CallanDRS-PSBBranch Chief (DRP/E, WCFO)Senior Project Inspector (DRP/E, WCFO)Leah Tremper (OC/LFDCB, MS; TWFN 9E10)
To receive copy of document, indicate
inborn�
"C" ~ Copy without enclosures "E" ~ Copy with enclosures "tt" ~ No copy
RIV:C:DRP/EHJWon ;df*I/10/96
D:WCFO
KEPerkins*1/10/96
0:DRPJEDyerI//~/96
*prev>ous y concurreOFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Washington Public PowerSupply System JAN I 2 l996
E-Hail report to D. Nelson (DJN)E-Hail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
bcc to DHB (IE45)
bcc distrib. by RIV:L. J. CallanDRS-PSBBranch Chief (DRP/E, WCFO)Senior Project Inspector (DRP/E, WCFO)Leah Tremper (OC/LFDCB, HS: TWFN 9E10)
Resident InspectorHIS SystemRIV FileBranch Chief (DRP/TSS)H. Hammond (PAO, WCFO)
Te receive copy of document, indicate inborn "C" ~ Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" ~ No copy
RIV:C:DRP/EHJWon ;df~1/10/96
D:WCFO
KEPerkins*1/10/96
D:DRP
JEDyer
I//~/96'previous
y concurreOFFICIAL RECORD COPY
ENCLOSURE I
ATTENDEES AT NRC/WPPSS MEETING ON DECEMBER 18, 1995
Washin ton Public Power Su 1 S stem
J. Parrish, Vice President, Nuclear OperationsJ. Swailes, General Plant ManagerP. Bemis, Director, Regulatory and Industry AffairsG. Smith, Director, equalityJ. McDonald, Assistant Engineering DirectorC. Schwarz, Manager, OperationsJ. Albers, Man'ager, Radiation ProtectionM. Hatcher, Staff Attorney
NRC
L. Callan, Regional'dministratorJ. Dyer, Director, Division of Reactor ProjectsK. Perkins, Director, Walnut Creek Field OfficeW. Batemam, Director, Reactor Projects Regions III/IV, NRRK. Brockman, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor SafetyH. Wong, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch E
J. Clifford, Senior Project ManagerR. Barr, Senior Resident Inspector (by phone)
Others
D. Williams, Nuclear Engineer, BPAJ. Engbarth, Executive Board Auditor
...960122009]
er ormancen ancement trate
Washington Public Power Supply SystemDecember 18, 1996
nro uc ion
oen na emar s
i> eGenc'.bande
~ ~
r ailiza iopial
unctiona rea resenters
»nro uc ionoresen ers
en a
0
~ MPB I I I I I'g R.G I I Id I t(S
e PES Status
o uneratians
~ Engineering Direct"r
o Engmeenng
e Health Physics
~ Corrective Action
~ Discussion
a t.'Inc:inn Remarked:~ ~~ ~ ~ tg 5 %~ ~ ~ 5%% ~ ~
~. 'v'. r arrisnP P Agmis
A C ~ I4 l% ~ Vs VII I I llI
C. J. Schwarz
J. H. SwaBes
J. A. IicDona!d
J. P. Atbers
G—.O. Smith
,I V Parrish
ro ess onitorin anssessment
» Introduction and Goal
»Attention on All PerformanceEnhancement Objectives
unctiona rea ro essssessment
e EVOIVir1g iv1etr>OuOIOgv vViih 'Reai
» Bi MOnthlv Fi)nCtiOnslP%>N VN>I I IVI I LN
BUwlvane\e ~ Diss@ AIIrcpwaeva4
C'~na ae en Illlnaea ~ a ~wa~n4 Q4~~~ I LJ~M~ ~I I )wl~cawul mlllm> IL MlallucII~~
ideniiivina Res uits
1- ont unctionassessment
~ Critical Assessment of Objectivesand Initiatives
~ Example: Implementation of SiteWide Ol-9 and Gold Card
~ Example: Changes to ProcurementWork Process Improvements
usiness an i nment
a DrWSIrlne Ya ar4HInnel I Inn~aW I I MV IUVN ~ I RUILIVIIRI L II I'QQI
khssess ment OT YloGl ess
~ 'near Results Contrasted AgainstQualitative Assessment
a h era Ie na Ahlnr 4hsnc end I~I4I~4Iii~~'W ~WWLII %@M,: %asF MJ WVLI V CiW Cl I I LI .,I I I I Ling L/ g ++are ppropr! ate
W
easurement tan ar s
enti in esu ts
~ Objective Progress lIeasuresProgress
e Existing Measurement StandardAlignment
~ Develop New MeasurementStandards
o Continue Refining MeasurementStandards
ssessment ree " o or"an es
e Kio Cnanoes Are Pianned
~ II lne 1 996 Self Assessvpe fit is plarIped
r OIYlAIeheflslxle Self ]5,,ssessment KJlail
ResLlir in performance AssessmentChange
onC uSion
~ Cautiously Optimistic
o Continue to Exercise and Refine
Performance Enhancement Strategy
~ Anticipate Changes and Enhancements
err ant ana el
T.~~ ~ ')hlnvlrW I 'QCll I I IIVIA
» Consisieni Team Focusea Goais
» Ciear Expeciaiions Regarding teamwork andC'nial'8 in a4 innM%st W I %4 ~ ~ ~ 'M Ir~ %J ~ ~
i> l2eiriforr e Iles(md RaheyIrarc
~ Efficjenny» Do it R(cCht The First Time
» Maximize Multi-Task Workforce Ability» Continue Emphasis on Corrective Action Pro+ram
~ institLit!ona! !z!ng Lxcel!enceOyerailolnls Set an4 Rel»force Per lorrnance $[andards
» ElllI IIIIale Perlo48 ol I I Icol Isis lent Perrormance
0
OCUS
~ Improve Safety Culture
e Create a Management OversightPresence
~ Foster Conservative Decision MakingEnvironment
n anne cram s
2 f'
E. F~~<L~k&~~; +4~ Akfg+~7 441<<< ~%
June July Aug Sept
&PAY 6 'p
Gci i Jov
stem er ormance
Systems Unavailability
1098
76
43
2
1
0
CIC Check Valve Problems
" O1 IP&e K4P$ 441li~la"f M
July Aug Sept Oct Nov
0 HPCS/RCIC
IN RHR
w Emerg AC Pwr
n annestem ctuations
mer enc enerator'reiaii
June July Aug Sept Oct Nov
a aci actor
1 20 )
100 3
So -I
85.7
94.5
R~~
ann eI VC.Q
97 A
4U: ]
20 $
Jul~ Aug Sept
n anne a a 11actor
OSSe
10 9.2
1.8
0.5
July Sept Oct Nov
ota s
WNP-2 Operationsservation
600 3
inn 486
~K%
512 511CGAW I
RIRÃ5
400 )
300 J
2001
<oo )
erationsO'
rea v cores
100
90
80
7000 60
CO
50
40
30
20
10
g8 g 997 98.5 98.7 99.1 99.5
IOctIINov
ProcedureUse
RO
AwarenessHanging
COs
WNP-2 OperationsSignificant PERs
12
2P
nV
June July Aug Sept
IIiaiion T~t aperations
v j.wA
Management OversightProgram
Oversight Program data accumulation ongoing
s Total Observations
@Avg Score
Nov Dec Jan
WNP-2 OperationsOV Tech Spec Violations
Ju)y AUg
5 LERs
Sept
II IXOvs
Oct Nov
July Aug Sept Oct Nov
~ULLl MellU. j. IUglcklll
onservative ecisionB. 1n
Sept
~ DYAVLAI+I AA ~P/I ~ A ~ ~ A~r l Vga'OV IVllbubC
Ort
ana ementnvo vement
o Create environment in which
Operations staff accepts, implements
and reinforces management
expectations at all times.
KNP-2 Operations
HPI - Clearance Order Performance
ED
UJ
4?
/X/
0
Aprii /YIBy June Juiy Aug Sept Oct Nov
0
Gold Card Programwners i ccounta i i
1
50
"- 40E
30
200L
'10
Z
Aug Sept
~ Proper Use Misuse
Oct Nov
WNP-2 OperationsAubrey Daniels Training
30q ,27
OU 30
20 3
W Total ParticipantsSl Ann DarHntn~~fnEKI ~PM I C4I Ll'&IRAQI ILV
0
Feb Mar
Month of Class
ro em enti ication
~ Increase the number of PERsgenerated as a result of
Operations'nvolvement
in plant activities.
~ Develop a common understandingamong Operations staff regardingthe need to document problems sothat they can be properlycharacterized and fixed.
WNP-2 OperationsPER Initiation
90
80 -I
I 0
003
50I
40 J
so $
2U
~o -I
9Q
MRMR 22
68
M
81
RM 30
18
Sept Oct Nov
a Ops<enerated 0 Ops Dispositioned
0
ro em eso ution
o Improve the system for reviewing
chronic problems and operator work-
arounds. Clearly communicate
system to Operations staff.
erationserator or aroun s
70 q
69
64
56
4p )5 TotBI Open
IIC1osed
10
0-
-WSep %Get t-Nov +Dec
0.
WNP-2 OperationsControl Room Deficiencies
60
50 0.8
40
3032.8
20
10
Sept OctAverage per month
Nov
WNP-2 OperationsOpen Work Status
40q noVemoer .i ~zv
30/30
25
20 )
21 ~Open
Ql >30 days
l0~ V
0
va<uion Tags TeAlp MOOS LCoiinop(Broke/Fix)
0.
lIB i o erations
~ Improve the process and common
understanding of issues among
Operations staff which leads to
preventing recurrence of minor
events.
WNP-2 OperationsA PER Rejections
~ %J
Y II
7 Jl
7V6f
4f'sVV.
$2
I
0
l-'
(y4~P e~
JUlg
"-'@FAN'P.q P fg ' Q 8»: ) f+Aeg~fh~
Sept Oct blov
WNP-2 OperationsControl Rod Mispositioning Events
0
Jan Mar May July Sept Nov
WNP-2 Operations ngineeringCommuniiations
AV
~r» 1
P~gRk)gP)t~~W-'5:-':.i%If
Sept
R
Oct Nov
n~ Good
m Poor
Gold Card Programroce ure om iance
~ 10
E 8
o 40L
2E
Z 0
Aug Sept
~ Proper Use Misuse
Oct Nov
Gold Card Programective ommunications
4hI M
'1- 8 J
CA
63'U
(3 4
e-2~Z AV
PUri Sept
~ PI'OPer USe ~iMISUSe
O~4 NOV
Gold Card Programe ec in
I
'10
8E
400L
Z Proper Use Misuse
Aug Sept Oct Nov
uestioninGold Card Program
ttitu e
e SO)~~
25 JD
V)
0s 2U]
o <5-I~0
cng) I ll
E5$
Aua Sept Oct
~Prone'ice ~ IVIici~c~~ ' ~ ~ %sf %4%@ %g
ro ams an roce ures
~ Assure all staff members strictlyfollow procedures
e Ensure Operations managementmakes decisions regarding the needfor procedure deviations inaccordance with approvedprocedures
WNP-2 Operations
HPI - Procedure Compliance
12
11/8
,ISl
z 4
//g 7
Jt!po Nov
~ .
WNP-2 Operations
HPI - Configuration Control
I 3Ill0
2E
z
0
April May June Ju/y Aug Sept Qct NOV
WNP-2 Operations
Procedure Deviations 8r. ChangeRequests
Arininafnrl hei An@ nnrennnnl.~ I lg II ICl I M%A LJf ~ PM PM I MUI I I I M I
can
100 -I
80 )Po 8U1
l0 J
z 20 -I
0
10195 SII
June
36'uiy
56
Aug Sept OGt
I15 ~
NOV
g P~g~dI Ire DeylgtinnS ml Plhl ePII II'8 Charm@ Poq1 5aetc
e.
orr ective ctions
o Ensure Operations staff accepts
issues brought to them by other
station personnel ~
ew n ineerin irectorwR1 es
a Vision ior ihe Future
~ Djrectorate Assessment
a Critic aj issues
o Engineering Directorate Mission
a Timino
ne enent e
ssessment o n ineerin
~ Performance Unchanged~ Problem Identification:
» Some favorable indications.
~ Problem Resolution:» Performance has remained inconsistent.» Good at obvious problems, weakness on
subtle problems.
~ Alignment:» Still some mis-alignment of priorities.» Too many corrective actions of little value.
LLI'l0.'4P '4 IIQ.L Lll LJ L LL
ssessment o n ineerincont.
PisN~ ~ sg~ ~~ ~r rruqrcar!!v.» Mod!f!cation development YifQQess gets inh
done but it is!nefficientQonrJ p! on! ess nn fi!e paotect!oq seal p~og~~+and relief vulva nrnnremVa ~ ave a wasws w ea ~ s ~ gas «gs va ~ ~ ~ ~
0 pERs.A Ao/ A4i nII DCDi see IHHAA4A CKRaKAavsn WW IO VI aII I I IXV QOOIQIIQL4 lV I llglllgg[lf,/g,
» Problem systems - p!ant stack monitor, RCiC.CMS and coritainment bypass paths.
LJ.i%4.L PL QLLL LLL LJL LJ.
ssessment o n ineerincont.
~ Backlogs:» Significant effort to disposition TERs
but 533 still pending Engineeringevaluation.
» Number and age of Temporarymodifications a concern:
—13 open temporary mods.—6 open longer than six months.—1 open since 1988.
n ineerin umaner ormance ren
Human Performance PERs in Enaineerino
A///W/Mat'-85 glpy 95 lg) 95 Sep-95
n ineerin 01'C 0
~ PTL Work items greater in 1995 compared
to 1994.
~ PTL Backlog continues to grow in 1995.
e.
esource orva uations
~ System Engineering prioritiesdefined.
o Plant goals.
~ Estimated overload in man-years.
~ Evaluated 96 project list.
esource or oa- atcva uations- cont.
e auneluereu uruC;VS> lmurOVementS.
a 7Aa ~ brae eA kI IAn+4 e+~VAAAlhw c.ei v uaeau uLIugaa a@ps vavi > ~
a Eisalgated Po) itine Dailu d Cfiyikjea
~ Re( QmmendatlQns I'evlelpfed ~ithplant.
stem n ineerin rimarI
es Onsl 1 ltles
~ Maintain knowledge of system status» Review logs, instrumentation, observe
operation» Evaluate surveillance test results» Evaluate system or program performance» Prepare, direct and document special tests
~ Provide follow-up corrective action foritems identified
o Support maintenance activities.~ Maintain a system improvement plan
stem n ineerin imeoc ation
Plant Nods7%
Perf Mon2%
PERs18%
Maint Support26%
A ply~ m a
OOI0 /0
Adminae IV
Other%P IV
ee'Nir~5@~K<
LA)~IIProcedure V8 V
2% Ops Support220/
$0/
Work Load/ Resource Actions InConcert with Affected Organizations
~ Goal: Accountability
o Reallocate resources.
~ Re-evaluated projects/programs.
~ l3rop low priority activities.
~ Process changes.
o Backlog reduction.
ommon oa s
~ Dose
QIIYFlifirant DnIe~nvlAI c ch%etIQI ~ ~ IIvc4~ IL ~ ~I ++) gg g'Q$ L [ [ Qf
~ system Perrormance indicators
y Qhronir Problems
e Work Grder Aoe and Bar kion
~ Contro! Room Deficiencies
e Capability Factoj.
~ Valve Function:» Outboard primary containment isolation valve
for RCIC vacuum pump discharge.» Line routes noncondensibles to suppression
pool.
~ Safety Significance:» Classified as QC1 and SR
~ Engineering Analysis:» RCIC able to perform its function without use
of vacuum pump and components.
DdieA/0 E/A<.J/ I VlJ3
9/17/95
9/18/95
10/16/95
Eveni
RCIC- Y -28 didn't open; aeciared -inoperable."
Valve declared "operable but degraded."
P 1 A C1GAPA cllnAAe+inrr ~~~~~41~ l "+ 2, 2 J ))a i Lm uayaaww SupfJAJI llllf vpvi QUIQ bUl uvgr dUVU,
Identified weekly stroKing not performed.
Valve fails test:.but not declared |no+crab le.
11/16/95
XlQ ILIA QAltOttAN finnr inn t~~CLl.,Y:V,Clgl LClllUll L L.M&i3 Y CLl-Y-Mo~
Analysis shows RCIC-V-28 not needed foron crab i1 it'll
RCIC
12/8/95 Valve changed to stainless swingcheck.
CtionS
~ FAOs will not be issued without assigningformal responsibility for actions required
. for operability.
~ Engineering and Operations management
provide clear guidance to engineers
regarding shared responsibility with
Operations for operability determinations.
ctions - conf
e Dvstem crigirleer involvementA w~wI Iva4'n kll~ 4'it ~ ~< >~i r't%&MLJLIIILClklIlllj( Cll l4 Pl o I L 'es
e Lesson L arned Or, Use of FAQ
0.
5.3E uali o Health PhysicsCollective Radiation Exposure,...
250
Man-Rem
200
150
100
50
IIMan-Rem
. ~C 4Q".
1 95 395 595 795 995
on uta e vera e
ont
hllANfk'la) hAOAP DI~ IA DAVAAVDAKVAAAKfAIIN~g <w<v»Lissy uvaav u)ua uv> uc) ncpleoellLo
21.5
IKAa SAfHI A 'L(AV6AA 'FAV BRAIDs> <uuva> y nv viage <v> uwv n.
I Cia ~ ~
10.z
VeV
Jan -Mug 93 Sep 93 - Aug 94 Sep 94-Aug 95 Sep - Nov 95
ose ie in ro'eels
~ Shieldin of RHR Pum Room "B".Pi in
~ Reduction of General Area dose rates near piping from 30-40 mrem/hr to 12-
14 mrem/hr. Reduction of contact dose rates on piping from 600 mrem/hr to
160 mrem/hr.
'Shieldin of Instrument Rack P004
~ Shielded several hot spots (to 30 R/hr) around SDV Tank, reducing general
area dose rates from an average of 250 mrem/hr to 100 mrem/hr. This effort'esultedin relaxing posting requirement from High-High Radiation Area to
High Radiation Area.
~ Shieldin of Instrument Rack P026
~ Shielded several level switches in and around the SDV Tank, reducing
general area dose rates from 400 mrem/hr to 200 mrem/hr.
DOSE REDUCTION EFFORTSSHIELDING PROGRAM
Chaalrdinn nf Chil Lln~r4na hh~asa P Qll LlP I l>nvasss —svsas vs vu v a avcav~a nuvvs — vayu a avy a
Reduction of contact dose rates on the header by approximatelv 70% andfhn nnnaral orna Ana O rafnC:"nn %ha firma halnaas the hnvrlev I ss ~ ~ a..s ~ sv /vs svs Ns Ns vQ %4vvv ~ 4svv vs ~ ls ~ %t ~ svva u'lr ~ %JIB s ~ sg a agggga ug Qppf QXim)4[e/y25"/o.
~ Hot S ot RemovaT: A 8 8 RNCUHoTd-u Pum Rooms'"Roo;„= Reduc~n- in-generaI-area dosevates from~0 mrem jhr to 30mremihr."R" +oo„, = +eductioA in-generaI-Brea dense r8168-XmfA460 fArem/hr to I 6mremihr.
~ Hot S ot Removal - RNCU Precoat Tank AreaReuuctioA in general area. dose rates Irom 260 rnlfemjhrio 20 mremjhr,allowing for the elimination of High-High Radiation Area.
DOSE REDUCTION EFFORTSFLUSHING PROGRAM
~ RWCU Suction Manifolds
Pre-Flush contact dose rates 600 mrem/hr to 5 R/hr. Post-flush contact doserates 500 mrem/hr to 2 R/hr. Approximate 20'/0 reduction.
RFW Low.Point Drains
Pre-flush contact dose rates 20-25 R/hr. Post-flush contact dose rates 100mrem/hr to 1 R/hr. Approximate 30'/0 reduction contact dose rates, 30'/0 reductiongeneral area dose rates.
~ RHR Sensor Lines
Pre-flush contact dose rates 450 R/hr; general area dose rates 28 R/hr post-flushcontact dose rates 400 mrem/hr. Approximate 70'/0 reduction in general areadose rates.
DOSE REDUCTION EFFORTSFLUSHING PROGRAM
PAP I snn C4n~wa T) IKAAIO'A Qsswaaa~a us W a ~ ~ ay = VlQQII I I LllII IQ'I lV OUI II S
Pre-flush contact dose rate (hnt ~nay) on R/hr p ~'fl h~ ie ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M< l I I 4 4 I I 4' I I 1CI 4 l
Aweam en4ra lkw4 wmm4% A 5'IIuvre I,aLQ [IIVLOPVlJ IeV Rlflfe
RPV M4 8 N~ozztes-Post4'lush-general area dose~te - factor of4 general area dose
rediiction
~ — ISI - RWCU Pi in 10$ Valve AreaPost-flush results - approximate 30 person-rem savings overal,
DOSE REDUCTION EFFORTSFLUSHING PROGRAM
0
~ Radwaste Bld 437'rocessin Area Drain LinesPre-flush contact dose rates R/hr; general area dose rates 3-5mrem/hr. Post-flush contact dose rate 100 mrem/hr; general areadose rates <1 mrem/hr. Approximate 4 rem savings.
~ RWCU-V-136 ISI NDE - approximate 2 rem savings.
~ RFW-V-70/71 lSI NDE - approximate 1 rem savings.
~ RWCU Hold-u Pum Rooms A 8 B - approximate factor of 2 generalarea dose rate reductions.
o RWCU Pi in Chemical Decontamination - approximate 15 remsavings.
DOSE REDUCTION EFFORTSFLUSHING PROGRAM
~ Reactor Bid~422'DR Lines (HPCS 8, CRD AiixRooms>
Flushing efforts have reduced qeneral area dose rates bv a factorof 3. !upon completion of. ongoing vrork in these areas, totals dosesavings to tie determined)
~ I%ad vvasL8 Bld 467'.Pre-Coat Tank Aiea
Pipin" removala factor of 4.
has.resulted in general area dose rate reduction by
Dose Reduction EHorts ThrouScheduling EHiciency
~ 1995 Percent Worked to Schedule70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
R-10 Outage
495 6 95 8 95 10 95
DOSE REDUCTION THROUGHAREA DECONTAMINATIONEI'I'ORTS
~ Reactor Bld 522'Elevationc 'a
cdhL PILI''VUUIIIuldLOIAledW~c:f Rirl~ hr r I Imlll~tnrhrn~0 % %%sF lt 4' %% w' 1V''%% ~ ~ %e IVY'hW 0 ~ 1 ~ V'Vl
- P004 Instrument Panel- P026 Instrument. Panel= East Side-Reach-c-Flmv-ContmlHCU- 'A'est Side-Recure-FIow-CmtrolHCU
~ Reactor B!d: 606'levation- West End of Refueling Floor- Stack Monitor PlaiformiFloorArea
~ Radwaste Bldg Elevation~ -437'atwalk 8 Valve Access
Area at RwCl l Batch Tank~ - 437'atwalk 8 Valve Access
Area at RWCU Batch Tank~ - 467'DR Pumo Area A 8 B
Vabte-AHey-
-487 Hot I 8 Q ShopTurbine Generator
— - 441-'-Condenser northeastcorner.
~ - 471'ehind shieidwaii (entire}S 50'I ~ Behind e Qjeldhgll lent
DOSE REDUCTION THROUGHAREA DECONTAMINATIONEFFORTS
~ Reactor Bld606'll floor space (except
shroud laydown)- 548'orth 5 South Pipechase- 522'orth Pipechase- 501'estside Pipechase,Steam Tunnel Entrance, SW 8East Valve room-471'W Corner Pipechase,West pipe/valve room
~ Radwaste Bld- 507'ntire floor- 487'ot Machine Shop toequipment- 467'll valve alleys not postedHR/HHR
~ Turbine Generator Bld-441'7 Sump Area
Note: these areas have traditionally been maintained as contaminated zones,however decontamination of these area can be reasonably achieved.
DOSE REDUCTION THROUGHDECONTAMINABLECOATING APPLICATIONS
Area IEleyation) Blrln) etc ) Flnnr Cnyerage (ft ) Wall Cnyerage lft~) Total Cnyerane /ft~l
441'G471'G501'G
437) Rw
'A&BFEEDPUMP ROOM
422'X RCIC
12)136 7,200
20,520
42 525
1 1,837
5,600
1)380
9,600
31 200:
37,504
7,100
3.180
-422 RX HPCS
422'X LPCS
422'X RHRC
Jhtl) I\V P)IA) Al IV rv) II10 AOCA%CC BA - RVV HVA rulV)r V~l:~
422'X - CRD PUMP AREA
SWPH 1A & 1B
I)h 8VC%
628
840
A)IIII )%$ V
1,452
5,780
C) JUU
2,700
4.200
w r))rI )PCS
1,660
7,040
TOV)ILS (~)T
105,04"2 115,909
NOTE: Areas shown above include equipment and hardware
19,336
30,120
73 725
49,341
12,700
4)560
3,824
3,328
5)040
3)045
3 112
12)820
220,951
ose e uction orts in'nera
ccess reas
~ Reduction in Average MREM per RCAHour: 0.035 mrem/hr
~ Hours Spent by Employees in GeneralAreas: 26,675 hours/month
~ Total Monthly Dose Savings JenUery gOctober Data:
erson
ose e uction orts inenera ccess reas
hlI V
0.5 ~0.3
0.2
U ~ I
II1995A ygr3n 6i"vl R E Iv) perRCA H'our
0
Oct
0
ren inPERs Classified as "Personnel Error"
PER Occurrences
1.5
0.5
0 0JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV
uman er ormancen icators
0 PBffOl'NBACB mVBr"slgrI I. OuservatiQnsL n t a w2<Ar
30-(0b 25
3FP CT .norLJ I
uman er ormancen icators
~ Human Performance Weaknesses90
80
70P
e e 60r r 50c re04on r 30
20
10
0AUG SEP
4kr~lQfgA'$:pp>?s
OCT NOV DEC
uman er ormanceImprove human performance at WNP-,2
0 IUlanaaement initiative to jmnroye hiram~ an~
wAset w se wa a va ra m ra ~ wa sa I~ 4 ~ al@&I I LJ I I I ICIIIlr& 'VMlI IPIVlVUs
s WIINQli l1h Yfhl'NQI1hh nhAIAIHA4AI AA 4:~ Iae ~ ~ Isa ~ ~ y%ri Ivl I ~ IQI Iv%r VVVIlAIIIClVI fJUOI lIUIl
esiaoiisiiea.
~ internal ancl exter nal attitudes regarding humanpeHqrmance identified.
e Current initiatives to imorove human
performance "ompleted.
0 Assess devices being-Used to FAonltor hu» ianance completed.
WNP-2 Personnel Success IndexAssess Effectiveness of Departmental Human
Performance
1.60 Errors er 10,000 Hours Worked
1.30
1.00
0.70
0.40
0.10
-0.20 3 5 7 9 11 1 3 5 7 994 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 95 95 95 95
—WNP-2 Significant Errors —Goal —WNP-2 Personnel Errors
Personnel Errors By OrganizationNovember 1995
eaaa etatm'eS>a~a,IVVV~ CVuWVwse(e,ta'vi ' t'~VvWca Vv4 >V AV+ ~ V'VVIA OP:NPFiVJAACW8&eC FCAVl4%4%$%~
Of
>i A3LI E] Personnel Errors
5 ~ig) <indicant. rrrors
I f N'l5
0.3 Corrective ActionImprove the effectiveness of corrective actions in correcting and
preventing the recurrence of significant deficiencies.
~ Corrective Action Review Board(GARB} formed and implemented.
~ Ongoing review of Significant PERsto assess adequacy of correctiveactions.
o Ongoing GARB feedback to PERdispositioners.
orrective ction eview
PEK DisnnSifinnS - AnnrnyedA~ l~IN
anoli7V /0
80o/o-~nollV/o60 J50 /o
40'9'/o
20o/o-
10o/o
0'/o
m mpproVeo.
10- 21--- JUI- J8-
21= 11- 23- 13=
Aug Sep Gci Oct Nov
0-
orrective ction eview 'ar
40%
35%
30%
25%
20o/
15%
10%
50/
00/
IIReturnedI
10- 24- 7- 21- 4- 18- 2- 16- 30- 13- 27-Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Oct Nov Nov
113. 1 0 UB 1
ssurance
~ Address Qualitv Assessment of
Performance Enhancen.ent Strategj;
~ Quality Assessmerit of PERs
O.
UB 1 ssessment o
~ CA Audit 295-073
» Assessed Implementation Plan andMeasurement Standards
~ Nine Surveillance's, Four Audits Since October1995
» Seven PES Initiatives Evaluated During Audits» Five Initiatives Evaluated During Surveillance's
~ Initiatives Are Being Implemented
~ Initiatives Appear on Track
~ Further Formal Audits on Semi Annual Basis
S CV1CWC
QB 1
140< ~aI 207
ann&
60 T
~la Totei~lg Modified
20+
AV
tun Jul
~~C4KM~
Jul Aug Aug Sep
eturnee... 0
is ositions
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
50/
00/10-JUI 31-Jul 21-Aug 11-Sep 2-Oct 23-Oct
S Returned
13-Nov
'A