discussion item # 3: people strategy
TRANSCRIPT
ETHIOPIA AN EMERGING
MANUFACTURING
HUB IN AFRICA
Tilahun E. Kassahun
Senior Policy Advisor, Ethiopian Investment Commission
2
Pharmaceutical manufacturing is a nascent industry in Ethiopia but has the potential
to promote import substitution, grow exports, and improve health through access to
medicines
100+ million Population
Total GDP : $74.bn
GDP/capita : $740
Gini coefficient : 0.3
Economics
Literacy 49% of total population
Pharmaceutical manufacturing market
▪ Ethiopia has a sizable and growing domestic pharmaceutical market
($684M in 2018), ~85% of which is met by imports
▪ Pharma manufacturing is a nascent industry:
– 9 local pharma manufacturers in Ethiopia
▫ Only few are GMP-certified
▫ Out of 380 essential medicines, less than 90 are produced locally
– 200+ importers
▪ Nonetheless, there are significant opportunities to grow the sector to:
– Promote import substitution
– Grow or diversify exports
– Improve access to essential medicines
▪ The Ethiopian government is keen to establish a pharma manufacturing hub
and plans to launch an industrial park for pharmaceuticals (Kilinto)
– In July 2015, the government put forth an ambitious 'National Strategy
for Pharma Mfg Development (2015-25)’
Health spend : $2.7bn
Health spend/capita : $27
Health spend/GDP : 5%
Availability of EDMs* : ~70%
Health
450 518 595 684
2015E 2016F 2017F 2018F
Pharmaceutical market in Ethiopia (2015-18F, $M)
Note: *Essential drugs and medicines
Source: World Bank, IMF, WHO, National Strategy and Plan of Action for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
3
The key drivers of demand are increasing disease burden, rising healthcare coverage,
and progressive growth of the Ethiopian population and economy
• Awareness, diagnosis and treatment of diseases are increasing for both communicable
and non-communicable diseases in Ethiopia
– Ethiopia is affected by the burden of communicable diseases; the country is
among the highest burden countries for Malaria, HIV/AIDS and TB
– In addition, prevalence of non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes, cancer,
and hypertension has also increased.
Rising healthcare
coverage
Progressive growth of
the Ethiopian
population and
economy
Increased
determination to
address disease
burden
• The Ethiopian government is increasing healthcare coverage to its large rural
population, thus promoting the need for increased access to pharma
– Ethiopia has a Health Extension Programme (HEP), which is a community based
strategy to deliver health promotion and awareness creation among the public
– The overall primary health care service coverage has reached 100% in 2015 and a
social health insurance scheme has been introduced to the public aiming to
increase access to health services
• With a population size of > 100M, Ethiopia has the second-largest population in Africa
• Ethiopia is expected to become a middle income country by 2025 with an average
economic growth of 10% per year resulting in an increase in the disposable income
of the population; the increase in disposable income will influence spending on
healthcare pharma products
Key drivers of pharmaceutical demand in Ethiopia
Source: Interviews, market research, AGI analysis
4
Strategic objectives
1.Improve access to medicines through quality local production
2.Strengthen the national medicine regulatory system
3.Create incentives designed to move along the value chain
4.Develop HR through relevant education and training
5.Encourage cluster development & API production
6.Create a R&D platform
7.Attract FDI in the pharmaceutical sector
8.Exploit the LDC status to locally produce patented products
The Ethiopian government has put forth an ambitious national strategy to
develop the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry
Indicators 2015 2020
target
2025
target
Pharmaceutical manufacturers with
international GMP compliance (n)
2 5 20
WHO prequalified products produced
locally (n)
0 4 15
New manufacturing companies and
local capital invested (n)
0 5 11
Joint ventures with international GMP
compliant companies (n)
3 8 15
API manufacturers (n) 0 1 3
Export of locally produced meds by
GMP-complaint producers (USDmn)
2 30 80
Selected targets
Source: National Strategy and Plan of Action for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Development in Ethiopia (2015-2025)
The study also incorporated other reports from the MOI, e.g. proposed incentive package, implementation plan for national
strategy, policy advisory report on intellectual property and local pharma manufacturing in FDR Ethiopia
5
Pharmaceutical
Industrial
Park
• Power consumption is dependent on the pharmaceutical product line, although it is not different from other
industries
- Power reliability is as important as availability in the pharmaceutical sector, as interruptions highly affect
the production process and quality of the end products
• Water supply is vital for pharmaceutical production. Depending on the product, different grades of water purity
are required (potable, bulk purified water, bulk highly purified water, water for injections, etc.)
- Input water treatment is typically done individually by investors, but GoE can provide the standards for
potable water. It can also be provided at different purity levels (Potable water < cleaning water < water for
syrups & suspension < water for injections)
• Waste Management: Pollution prevention, reduction, and/or treatment is required for air emissions, liquid
effluents and solid wastes. The toxic concentration depends on the type of product. Pre-treatment at the
facility / cluster before joining the CETP is most often required. Zero-liquid discharge is also a possible
(but quite expensive) technology. HVAC for air emissions should be chosen and justified by companies
• Warehouse: Storage area should be of sufficient capacity to allow orderly storage of the various categories of
materials and products (raw materials, intermediaries, packaging, finished, quarantined, released & rejected
products). Segregation and labelling is required to prevent errors/mix-ups
- Warehouses should be designed to ensure good storage conditions (clean & dry, maintained within
acceptable temperature/humidity limits). Highly active products stored in a secure area
Clustering, infrastructure and exports: Pharmaceutical industrial parks have
unique infrastructure requirements from ones focused on other sectors
Source: EFMHACA, Arvind, WHO
Infrastructural requirements for a pharmaceutical industrial park
• Others: transportation facilities and one stop shop services should be included
- Ideal if the one-stop-shop include customs, FMHACA, environmental protection and other government
offices for ease of operation
Notes: in manufacturing Finished products, the loss is projected to be 2-3%
6
Hawassa Eco-Industrial Park
The strategy of attracting a high-profile company to serve as an ‘anchor’ for
pharmaceutical cluster development can work, but needs to be nuanced
7
8
Kilinto industrial park - dedicated to pharmaceuticals
Source: Kilinto design report, IPDC
9
The goal is to attract investment from leading pharmaceutical manufacturers so that
Ethiopia can become an export hub and top API manufacturer in Africa
Criteria for targeting foreign
companies for investment promotion
Technological
capability
Export
experience
Financial
resources
Companies should have strong technological capability
that they will bring to Ethiopia through investment
Companies should have proven track record of
exporting pharmaceuticals, and should have the
intention of exporting pharmaceuticals from Ethiopia
Companies should bring their own financial resources
(debt and/or equity) to finance their investment in
Ethiopia
Goal: To become an export hub and leading API manufacturer in Africa
EIC will:
• Lead targeted recruitment of anchor investors
• Conduct due diligence on potential investors
• Cooperate with relevant GoE agencies (MoI, FBPIDI, MoH, FMHACA, PFSA, MoFA)
10
Market access 1:
Ethiopia is highly dependent on imports; local production contributes only ~15-20%
of domestic demand
324 338 352 364 374 383
2015E 2016E 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
Ethiopia pharmaceutical imports (2015E-20F)*
$US million
0.2123.69.5
878.5
74.7Ethiopia
Glands and organ, dried and extracts, for
therapeutic use
Blood, antisera, vaccines, toxins and cultures
Pharmaceuticals in bulk form
Pharmaceuticals in finished dose form
Special pharmaceutical goods
Note: Forecast based on external market research report
Source: BMI Research, AGI analysis
11
While there are 200+ importers, there are only 9 local manufacturers of
human medicines in Ethiopia
Level 1
Import
Level2
Packaging and
labeling
Level 3
Product
manufacturing
Level 4
API
manufacturing
Level 5
Research and
development
>200
importers,
wholesalers
and
distributors
0 company 0 companies 0 companies • 9 manufacturers of
human medicines or
gelatin capsules
− 4 GMP-certified
companies
− 0 WHO prequalified
products
Source: The National Strategic Plan of Action for Pharmaceutical manufacturing development in Ethiopia (2015-2020)
Description
Domestic
companies
Mapping of the Ethiopian Pharmaceutical sector in the value chain
Distribution of
finished
pharmaceutical
products
Packaging and
labelling of imported
bulk finished
pharmaceutical
products following
national or
international GMP
standards
Formulation of
finished products
from imported Active
Pharmaceutical
Ingredient(API) and
excipients by
following national or
international GMP
standards and WHO
prequalification
standard for products
Production of Active
Pharmaceutical
Ingredient (API) and
excipients by
following national or
international GMP
standards and WHO
prequalification for
APIs
Research and
development for new
formulations,
processes and new
chemical entities
following national or
international
GLP/GCP and
ethical standards
12
0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.20.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F 2021F 2022F 2023F 2024F 2025F
Public Private1.3
1.6
2.0
2.3 2.5
2.5 2.9
3.1 3.4
3.6
3.9
4.2 4.4
4.6
4.9
5.1
Government is the largest customer; 75% of all medicines consumed in
Ethiopia is procured through the public sector
Ethiopia: Public and private heath spend (2010-25F)
($US billion)
Note: *Based on National Strategy and Plan of Action for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Development
Source: BMI, AGI analysis, Interviews
• Government contributes ~60%
of total healthcare spend in
Ethiopia
• For pharmaceuticals, the share
of the public market is even
higher
– ~75% of all medicines
consumed in Ethiopia is
procured through the public
sector*
• The public sector procures
products largely based on price,
favoring generics medicines
• ~90% of branded products are
sold through the private
pharmaceutical market
13
The majority of drugs are procured through the public sector
Ethiopian Pharmaceutical market (2015)
Pharmaceutical market in Ethiopia (2015)
Public market*
Government purchases
(Revolving drug fund)**
Program purchase
(donor funded)
Purchase from local
manufacturers International tenders
1 company: direct
negotiation 2 or more companies:
Closed bid
In-kind donations Private market**
Note: *Public sector includes RDF and Program Purchases (in-kind donations are not included). **private sector share was estimated at 25% of the total domestic market size
Source: PFSA, Interviews, NS-POA, AGI analysis
~75% of value
~30%
~25% of value*
Public market
~70%
14
Market access and other incentives
Key incentive categories
Market Access (Revenue
enhancing)
Incentives that directly impact
the revenue of the company
(e.g., price and/or volume)
1. Procurement: Closed bids
• Price advantages in tenders
• Export incentives and facilitation
Reduced import competition
1. Regulation
2. Talent development & facilitation
3. Availability of infrastructure
4. Access to R&D
5. Access to foreign exchange
6. One-stop-shop services
1. Custom duty exemptions
2. Corporate income tax
3. VAT exemption
4. Access to finance
Incentive types
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
4
12
Tax and Finance (Profit
enhancing)
Incentives that directly impact
costs, and consequently the
company’s profit margin
Operational efficiency Incentives that facilitate setting
up and running a business in the
sector
Ethiopia
14
15
According to manufacturers, 6 out of the 14 incentives are critical
Importance to manufacturers
Procurement: Closed bids 1
2
3
5
6
4
Price advantages in tenders
Export incentives and facilitation
Reduced import
competition
Custom duty exemptions
Corporate income tax exemption
VAT taxes
Access to finance
7
8
Regulation 9
Talent development & facilitation
10
Availability of infrastructure
11
Access to R&D 12
Access to foreign exchange 13
One-stop-shop services 14
Feedback from manufacturers
Market
Access
(Revenue
enhancing)
Tax and
Finance
(Profit
enhancing)
Operational
efficiency
• Manufacturers indicated that closed bid RDF procurements by
PFSA and protection of the domestic market through import
tariffs are the most important market access incentives
• Existing domestic manufacturers indicate that the 25% price
premium offered by PFSA in international tenders is less
important, as they are seldom competitive even with the price
advantage
• As a majority of inputs to pharmaceutical production are
imported, e.g. APIs, excipients, and primary packaging, custom
duty exemptions are one of the most important incentives to
maintain
• Regulatory challenges and access to foreign exchange are
among the most significant challenges to pharmaceutical
manufacturing in Ethiopia, and incentives aimed at facilitating
these processes are important
• As pharmaceuticals is a knowledge-intensive industry, talent
development and facilitation was similarly rated as an
important incentive to offer
• Access to finance is less important for large MNCs, but a
significant challenge among existing domestic manufacturers
Sub-category Category Critical Important
Moderate Low
16
Public procurement can be more attractive to investors with proper legal
framework for closed bids and longer-term supply contracts
Note: Closed/restricted bid: a bid restricted to participants selected based on a specified criteria by the procuring body. In Ethiopia, closed-bid tenders are allowed only to local manufacturers.
Source: Interviews, EIC & AGI analysis
Closed tender
for local
manufacturers
Long term
market
guarantee
(volume or
price)
• Local closed-bid tenders are currently offered for products being produced in
sufficient quantity by two or more domestic manufacturers;
• Hence, the exercise of closed-bid tenders to encourage local manufacturers is
available
• A number of improvements have been recently be introduced
• A significant trade-off with public health must be considered
• Long-term purchase contracts are attractive for MNCs looking to invest in Ethiopia
• The experience of Anti-retroviral (ARV) production in South Africa and Uganda
• South Africa: Central Procurement Authority has a long-term contact with a local
manufacturer, Aspen, to supply ARVs
• Uganda attracted Cipla to manufacture ARVs locally by signing MOU, providing 20%
price preference for local production and guaranteed volumes
Increase transparency of the tender system • Review procurement/tender management system: Manufacturers associations/private sector should be
engaged • Procurement results should be made public so that local manufacturers and/or other suppliers can submit
objections • Enhance PFSA laboratory and technical evaluation capacity to ensure quality of procurement
17
Market access 2: While the Ethiopian market ~$684 M – 1billion, the African pharmaceutical market is
valued at >$25B and is growing at a rate of ~13% per annum
Note: * 2013 numbers are approximate; 2020 numbers are estimates; ** CAGR is for the top seven countries in Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya,
Morocco, Nigeria, and South Africa)
Source: McKinsey (2015) Africa: A continent of Opportunity for Pharma
The growth of pharmaceutical sales in Africa*
(2013-20E), $US billion
6%
9% 6%
10% 13%
17%
Pharma segment growth in Africa
(2013-20E), $US billion
As developed markets stagnate, Africa represents a promising source of growth for multinational pharmaceutical
companies
CAGR%
CAGR**
18
Pharmaceutical market in Africa, however, is led by seven countries, which
constituted ~70% of the total market in 2015
Pharmaceutical sales in Africa (2010-20F)
US$ billion
Note: The order of the countries is based on their Pharmaceutical sales in 2020F
Source: BMI, AGI analysis
Ethiopia represented
only ~2% of the African
pharma market in 2015
CAGR CAGR
2010-15 2015-20F Top 7 in Africa
Sub-Saharan
Africa
3.9% 4.4%
Total Africa 5.1% 6.8%
17.1
18.9
20.8
22.7
23.8
21.8 22.3
23.6
25.5
27.8
30
9.5% Algeria 9.2%
Egypt 9.5% 5.3%
Tunisia 5.4% 6.7%
Morocco 3.0% 8.6%
Nigeria 1.4% 0.4%
South Africa 0.2% 2.5%
8.0% 3.6% Rest of Africa
Kenya 12.3% 9.7%
19
400
141
39 35 25 19 12 6 5 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
South Africa, Egypt, and Kenya are the largest exporters of pharmaceuticals
in Africa; top 5 countries represent 90% of the continent’s exports
Top African countries that export pharmaceuticals
Export value of pharmaceutical products (2015), $US million
Note: *While UN COMTRADE states that Ethiopian pharmaceutical exports was only $998K in 2015, the Ethiopian government in its GTP-II states that
the actual figure was $2.7M. For consistency, the data in this graph is from UN COMTRADE.
Source: Calculations based on UN COMTRADE statistics, AGI analysis
Top 5 countries in
Africa represent 90%
of continent’s exports
($640M)
Ethiopia exported only
~0.14% of the continent’s
pharmaceutical exports in
2015*
Exports in India and China, in
comparison, are ~$12.5B and
~$6.9B respectively
20
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Ave
rag
e d
ista
nc
e w
ith
de
sti
na
tio
n c
ou
ntr
ies
(k
m)
Concentration of exporting countries**
Egypt
Kenya
Mauritius
Tunisia
Uganda Tanzania
Morocco
Senegal Ghana
Botswana
Cameroon
Togo
Zimbabwe
Swaziland
Algeria Ethiopia
Benin
South Africa
Concentration of exporting countries in Africa and average distance to importing partners*
Pharmaceutical products (2015)
Across the continent, pharmaceuticals produced locally are typically
consumed domestically or traded regionally
Note: *Size of bubble is proportional to the export value. **The concentration is based on the Herfindahl index. Indices between 0.10 and 0.18 is considered
to be moderately concentrated and indices above 0.18 to be concentrated. This indicator is a measure of the dispersion of trade value across an
exporter’s partners.
Source: Calculations based on UN COMTRADE statistics
Long-distance
exporters with many
importing partners
21
Manufacturers indicate that the key criteria when selecting export destinations are
market size, registration requirements, trade agreements, distance and competition
Criteria for choosing export destinations
Average ratings by companies (N=9)
On a scale of 1 to 7; where 1 is not important criteria and 7
is most important criteria
4
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
Existing business relationswith vendors/distributors
Drug pricing in destinationcountry
Import tariff
Competition in destinationcountry
Distance (cost oftransportation)
Trade agreements
Registration requirements formarketing approval
Market size in export country
• Addressable market size
and regulatory
requirements for drug
approval are the two most
important criteria
• Membership in Regional
Economic Communities
(RECs) is also considered an
important criteria, as it can
facilitate easier market
access
• Inland transport
considered cost effective
for export to neighbouring
countries due to
inaccessibility of many
African markets by sea and
high cost of air transport
Source: AGI survey of Ethiopian pharma manufacturers (2016)
22
Source: AGI analysis
Target regions with high export
potential and pursue RECs-based
regulatory harmonization, which is likely to
be achieved in the medium to long-term
This may be a necessary pre-condition
for the GoE to realize its vision to become
the leading regional hub for
pharmaceutical production and export
Prioritize countries with high export
potential in Africa and pursue bilateral
harmonization / mutual recognition of
regulatory frameworks
− FMHACA is pursing this approach with
countries like Jordan
− Recommend initiating the same with
prioritized export destinations
… while pursuing country-specific bilateral regulatory agreements over short-term
REC-based regulatory harmonization is important; but also bilateral
agreements can be solutions in the short run
Harmonize regulations through RECs as a
medium to long-term strategy…
2 1
23
Regulatory harmonization is crucial for reasons of regulatory efficiency and
market access
Benefits of harmonization
1. Differences in regulation across countries constitute trade restrictions
(non tariff barriers) - Standards convergence or harmonization
facilitates market access
- assessment of dossiers and registration takes 1- 3 years in African
countries. In the absence of joint assessment or mutual recognition
system, companies face lengthy time and complex country-specific
procedures in each importing country.
- country specific requirements (labeling, fees etc.) form NTBs
2. Many African MRAs do not have the required capacity – less than 30%
of African MRAs are considered competent by WHO – reduces burden
on national MRAs by pooling resources, reducing duplication, and
adopting best practice
• Driven by AMRHI (African Medicines Registration Harmonization
Initiative) which is led by consortium of regional organizations and
development partners
• RECs-based harmonization – all RECs invited to submit
proposal
• Piloting and sequenced approach – level of harmonization and
choice of RECs
Source: Accelerating regulatory approval through WHO (2016), Impact of regulatory requirements on medicine registration in Africa (2012)
Level 1 – Information sharing: common data/ regulation repository - easy access to countries and companies
Level 4 – Joint registration: regional level /central assessment and registration – zero country-specific procedure
Level 2 - harmonization of technical and scientific materials: harmonized guidelines for registration and GMP inspection (country level assessment and decision)- streamlined procedure and requirements
Level 3 - Joint assessment and inspection: simultaneous submission to NMRAs => REC Secretariat/lead country coordinates joint assessment sessions => joint dossier assessment => Country level registration subject to administrative requirements - reduced time for national registration (3-6 months Vs 1-3 years)
4 levels of harmonization identified Harmonization overview
24
Harmonization is occurring through RECs; EAC is the furthest along, while
IGAD and COMESA are lagging behind
Source: Accelerating regulatory approval through WHO (2016), Impact of regulatory requirements on medicine registration in Africa (2012)
IGAD
EAC
SADC/
COMESA
ECCAS
ECOWAS/
UEMOA
RECs Current level of harmonization
EAC
Level 3 – Joint assessment
•3 rounds, over 8 products approved, largely essential
generic drugs, registration within 3 months
SADC
Level 3 – Joint assessment
•125 generic products and one innovative medical
product assessed so far
•Focus on regional priority drugs – anti-infectives, anti-
hypertensive, anti-diabetics, registration within 11
months
ECOWAS
Level 2 - harmonization of technical and scientific
materials
•Developing regional “centres of excellence” on
bioequivalence centre & quality control labs
•Regionalization is championed by Nigeria
ECCAS
Level 2 - harmonization of technical and scientific
materials
•At initial stages
IGAD
Level 1 – Information sharing
•Regional harmonization program launched in 2015, yet
to establish a regional regulatory unit, preparing a
proposal for participation in AMRH
COMESA
Not actively engaged so far
•60% countries in EAC and SADC
25
6.2B
4.3B
2.8B
2.2B
1.4B
COMESA SDAC ECOWAS IGAD EAC
Addressable market size by region ($B, 2015 pharmaceutical imports)
COMESA represents a large export market with an addressable market size
of $6.2B; other neighbouring regions, IGAD and EAC, are considerable in
market size as well
Source: Calculations based on UN COMTRADE statistics, AGI analysis
26
Regional blocks
Member countries –
addressable market
size (2015)*
Note: * Import of pharmaceutical products was used as a proxy for addressable market size **local supply as % of market
Source: Calculations based on UN COMTRADE statistics and BMI, Interviews, AGI analysis
COMESA
IGAD
ECOWAS
EAC
SADC
6 countries – $1.4B
19 countries – $6.2B
8 countries – $2.2B
15 countries – $2.8B
Competition**
Level of
harmonization
(1-4)
Possibility for FMHACA to
harmonize (Medium-term)
High to Medium
▪ Member, but
harmonization not high
on the agenda
Medium to Low
▪ Not member, but more
than half are COMESA
members
No
Low
▪ Not member
Ethiopia
membership
High to Medium
▪ Member, harmonization on
the agenda only recently,
capacity limitations
YES
Yes
NO
NO
30%
25%
7%
20%
6%
Medium
▪ Not member, but
observer
3
0
1
3
2
15 countries – $4.3B
GoE should champion regulatory harmonization within IGAD, as it represents a favourable regional market
with relatively low competition; COMESA also represents a significant opportunity provided regularity
harmonization is pursued in the medium to long-term
Ethiopia can play a leadership role in achieving regulatory harmonization with
IGAD in the medium-term and COMESA in the longer-term
27
In the following prioritized countries, the GoE should seek to harmonize its regulatory
procedures, facilitate information exchange, and foster vendor/distributor relationships
Source: Interviews and survey
+Somaliland
Prioritized export markets
Average rating across key export challenges
faced as reported by 5 companies
On a scale of 1 to 7; where 1 is not challenging
and 7 is most challenging
4.8
4.8
5.6
6.2
6.8
Lack of competitiveness of locally produced products
in export markets
Access to forex
No vendors / distributor relationships
Limited knowledge of export markets
Regulatory procedures in export destinations / lack
of regulatory harmonization
Most challenging issues
10 prioritized export
markets
•7 in COMESA
•3 in ECOWAS
(see appendix for
detailed list) Sudan
Kenya Uganda
Congo
(DRC)
Zimbabwe
Senegal Mali
Burkina Faso
Zambia Malawi
28
The following interventions are also necessary to address other export-
related bottlenecks
Lack of competent Bioequivalence studies – key for export
competitiveness and has high cost implications
• The Bioequivalence Centre in Ethiopia (under School of
Pharmacy of AAU) lacks effective organizational structure,
adequate resources and is yet to be certified by the WHO
• Undertaking the test overseas has high cost implication – the
cost of testing in Kenya or South Africa is 2X that of Ethiopia’s
Lack of timely access to foreign exchange – key for optimal
production and export
Lack of (High cost) of special refrigerated trucks necessary for
some inland transportation – the preferred means for African
countries
Expensive outsourcing of pharmaceutical transports by ESLSE
due to lack of refrigerated containers
Source: Interview, AGI analysis
Capacitate Bioequivalence
center through diagnostics and
tackling of prevailing challenges
CBE to enhance bank to bank
transactions
Enhance the forex regime (see
incentive)
Incentivize duty free import of
specialized trucks as capital
goods
Enhance ESLSE’s care logistics
capacity
Recommended Interventions Export-related bottlenecks identified
29
Thank you!