distinguishing between self and other: how shared are shared representations? marcel brass

26
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences 04.2006 Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY LEIPZIG

Upload: britanni-rogers

Post on 31-Dec-2015

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass. MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE. FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY LEIPZIG. Cognitive psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations?

Marcel Brass

MAXPLANCK

INSTITUTE

FOR

HUMANCOGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCESDEPARTMENT OF COGNITIVE NEUROLOGYLEIPZIG

Page 2: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Observation and execution of action are closely linked

• Cognitive psychology

– movement observation has a strong influence on movement execution (Brass et al., 2000, 2001, Stuermer et al., 2000)

• Social psychology

– chameleon effect (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999)

• Brain imaging

– activation of motor related areas by action observation (e.g. Grezes & Decety, 1999)

• Neurophysiology

– mirror neurons (e.g. Rizzolatti & Craighero, 2004)

Page 3: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

The direct matching hypothesis

Action observation leads to an activation of an internal motor representation.

Page 4: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Open questions

• Why don‘t we imitate all the time?

• Why don‘t we confuse internally generated and externally triggered motor representations?

Page 5: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Neuropsychological findings

• Luria (1966)

– prefrontal patients show echopractic response tendencies

• Lhermitte et al. (1986), DeRenzi et al. (1996)

– patients with prefrontal lesions show overt imitative behavior

Page 6: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

The imitation-inhibition task

congruent incongruentbaseline

Brass et al. (2000)

Page 7: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Brass et al. (2000)

++

Lift the index finger when a `1` appearsand the middle finger when a `2` appears.

The imitation-inhibition task

Page 8: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Results

Brass et al. (2000)

inconbasecon

Page 9: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Patients

• 16 patients with frontal lesions of different etiology and lesion site

• 14 patients with posterior lesions (temporal, parietal)

• 16 age-matched controls

Page 10: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Results

Brass et al. (2003)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Interferenz(%)

Imitation-inhibition task

frontal posterior control

* *

interference score: incongruent errors (%) – congruent errors (%)

Page 11: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Conclusions

• Patients with frontal lesions have problems to inhibit imitative response tendencies.

Page 12: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Functional mechanisms involved in the inhibition of imitative behavior

• Hypothesis

1. The inhibition of imitative behavior involves general inhibitory mechanisms.

2. The inhibition of imitative behavior involves specific mechanisms related to the distinction of self-generated and externally triggered motor representations.

Page 13: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Experimental design

• ten healthy right handed participants• the imitation-inhibition task

• functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Page 14: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Imitation-inhibition task

Incongruent vs. congruent

Brass, Derrfuss & von Cramon (2005)

1

2

1

2

anterior fronto-median cortex (aFMC)

temporo-parietal junction area (TPJ)

Page 15: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

The functional role of the anterior fronto-median cortex and the TPJ

– sense of agency (e.g. Farrer et al., 2003)

– perspective taking (Ruby & Decety, 2001, 2003)

– out of body experience (Blanke et al., 2002)

Page 16: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Conclusions

The inhibition of imitative behaviour seems to involve mechanisms related to self-other distinction.

Page 17: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

The mirroring of contextual information

• Are environmental constraints mapped onto the observer’s motor representation?

Page 18: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Prediction

Observing a physical restraint in another person should restrain the observer.

Page 19: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Paradigm

no restraint corresponding restraint non-corresponding restraint

Page 20: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Demonstration

Page 21: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Results

Page 22: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Alternative hypothesis

The slowing effect is due to higher perceptual difficulty in the corresponding restraint condition.

Page 23: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Test

no restraint corresponding restraint

if a ‘1‘ appears if a ‘2‘ appears

Stimuli

Responses

Page 24: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Results

Page 25: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Summary

• There is an automatic tendency to imitate observed behaviour.

• Prefrontal patients have problems to inhibit imitative response tendencies.

• The inhibition of imitative behaviour involves functional mechanisms related to self-other distinction.

• Not only the action itself is mapped onto the observer’s motor representation but also environmental constraints.

Page 26: Distinguishing between self and other: How shared are shared representations? Marcel Brass

Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences04.2006

Roman LiepeltStephanie SpenglerMichael SteinbornHarold Bekkering

Jan DerrfussWolfgang Prinz

D. Yves von Cramon