district vadodara [juna udepur cu] commissionerate of...

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

Detail Project Report IWMP-13

[Juna Udepur CU]District Vadodara


Commissionerate of Rural Development

Gujarat


Contents

Table no.1: Basic project information ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Table no. 2: Weight age of the project ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ........................................................................................................................................ 7

Table no.3: Watershed information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: .............................................................................................................................. 9

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ................................................................................................................................... 10

CHAPTER – 2 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 11

2.1. Project Implementing Agency .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

Table no. 6: PIA: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 14

CHAPTER – 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15

Geography and Geo-hydrology .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Soil and topography: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table no.12: Climatic conditions ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 20

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ................................................................................................................................................................................ 20

Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 17: Crop details: ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Livestock: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Socio-Economic Profile .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25


Table no. 21: Demographic information ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26

Migration Pattern:...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Infrastructure facilities: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28

Livelihood pattern: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Dependence on Common Property Resource ........................................................................................................................................................................... 30

CHAPTER – 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37

Watershed Activities .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38

Scientific Planning: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ......................................................................................................................... 41

i) Watershed Committee (WC) .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 44

ii ) Self Help Group ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46

User Group: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 51

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ....................................... 57

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises .................................................................................. 58

Production System –I ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 64

Production System-II .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 67

Production System III: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 70

Production System IV: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 71

Production System V: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 72

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ....................................................................................... 74

4.4. Capacity Building: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 76

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ............................................................................................................................... 78

CHAPTER – 5 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 79


BUDGETING ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 79

Budgeting ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80

CHAPTER – 6 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84

EXPECTED OUTCOMES ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 84

Expected Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 85

Employment ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 85

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas ........................................................................................................................................................... 92

Chapter-1 Project Background


Project Background Project Juna Udepur (IWMP-13) is located in

Chhota udepur Taluka, Vadodara District of Gujarat

state. IWMP-13 consists of 11 villages and area around

4663.89 ha is taken into the project as per the priority

for treatment. 11 villages fall under 5 gram panchayats.

All the villages are separated by a distance of 20-30 kms

from Chhota udepur taluka. 5 Watershed committees

are constituted for these villages. Separated sub-

watershed committee are formulated at village level.

This project is expected to cover 8 micro watersheds

with codes 5D1B7b1a, 5D1B7b1e, 5D1B7b1b,

5D1B7b1c, 5D1B7b1d, 5D1B7b2h, 5D1B7b2j,

5D1B7b2c. The total project area proposed to be

treated under Integrated Watershed Management

Programme (IWMP).

The nearest towns are Chhoudepur which is approximately about 20-25 Km from almost all the villages, and these villages are

mostly connected well connected by pucca tar road by local transportation facilities except for few which are unknown for their

inaccessibility. The project is having moderate vegetation. The project area falls among the 8 micro watersheds. Rathva, Nayaka and

Koli are the major inhabitants of the project area. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, wage

labour, and depends on local based natural resources, and livestock-buffalo, cow, goat, and poultry bird on a small scale.

The watershed falls under the government designated tribal area. The water level is almost 200-250 feet deep further,

structure of the soil is very shallow with moderate topography with the slightly hilly surrounding. Considerably a slope of more than

20-25 can be seen.


Table no.1: Basic project information

Sl No.

Name of the

project

Villages Gram Panchayats

Taluka District Area of the

project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project

cost PIA

Name Census code

1

Juna Udepu

r

Simal Faliya 190050140310000 Simal Faliya

Chhota udepur

Vadodara

611.9 99.9 11.988

Forest divisio

n

2 Oliamba 190050140280000 Oliamba 510.3 510.3 61.24

3 Manka 190050140380000 Gabadiya 124.3 121.56 14.5872

4 Luni 190050140470000 Singla 486.5 483.25 57.99 5 Badvav 190050140480000 Singla 229.1 228.7 27.444 6 Bhensa 190050140350000 Harvant 696.5 695.5 83.58

7 Gathiya 190050140450000 Gabadiya 565 562 67.44

8 Singla 190050140460000 Singla 1406.3 905.3 108.636 9 Padarvant 190050140290000 Oliamba 336.33 336.33 40.3596

10 Juna Udepur 190050140360000 Gabadiya 361.3 360.1 43.212

12 Gabadiya 190050140370000 Gabadiya 862.4 360.95 43.314

total

6189.93 4663.89 559.7868

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST,

Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture,

Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another

watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a

composite ranking was given to IWMP-13 Watershed project as given in table no. 2.

The total number of families under BPL is 514, which is equal to28.12 per cent of the total households of the project. Hence a

score of 10 is allotted. The percentage of schedule tribe in the project is 99.57% percent to the total population; hence a score of 10

was allotted. Rainfed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village majority of the persons. More than 80 per cent of the

farmers are small and marginal by nature and the average land holdings of farmers in around 2-3 ha and the actual wages earned by

the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 5, 5 and 5 are allotted respectively.


Since this area is prone to frequent drought land is and due to the low moisture index the area is classified under IWDP block.

Drinking water is a major problem in this project area. In a broader view the soil of this region is suitable for agriculture crops and

cash crops but due to lack of water harvesting structures and irrigation water, agriculture itself has become a constraint and the

productivity potential has considerable gone low. The soil is very shallow and hence rate of infiltration is more however production of

the land can be significantly is brought up with the help of better management practices and availability of timely irrigation and use of

organic and inorganic fertilizer. Chottaudepur watershed falls under second priority and it is an individual cluster. Cluster approach

was followed taking into consideration 8 micro-watersheds covering a total area of 4663.89 Ha.

All the parameters taken together and a cumulative score of 83 is given to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).

Table no. 2: Weight age of the project

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S.

No. Criteria

Maximum score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) Iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

Iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

Project name

Project type

Weightage

Juna Udepur

Others

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii Total

10 10 10 5 3 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 0 83


Vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

Ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

X Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

Xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0)

Xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5


Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project

No. Of watersheds to be treated

Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

Juna Udepur IWMP-13

8 5D1B7b1a, 5D1B7b1e, 5D1B7b1b, 5D1B7b1c,

5D1B7b1d, 5D1B7b2h, 5D1B7b2j, 5D1B7b2c Others

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the IWMP-13 village

This project is very back ward in various issues and falls under tribal area, still some of the villages fails to draw the limelight of

schemes and developmental projects. Although NREGS (National Rural Employment Scheme) and Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Sardar

Awas Yojana, SGSY, Sakhi Mandal .

i. NREGS: Construction of Wells, kutcha Road constructions works, pond depending, check walls, bori bunds and other labour

intensive activity has been taken-up under NREGA. Construction of boundary trenching, boundary walls, nursery and terrace

ponds on hill tops is also taken up through forest department.

ii. Indira Awas Yojana: Total houses constructed in this project are 89 and all the villages of this project have Indra Awas

Yojana. Sardar Awas : houses were built under this schemes and work is still in progress in some of the villages.

iii. SGSY: Total groups under this scheme are 22 and are currently active and some of the groups are under grading process.

iv. Sakhi Mandal: Sakhi Mandal schemes comprise of several groups which are sustainable from long time.

v. TASP: This is a designated as tribal area hence different activities are taken up by for welfare of people these tribal villages.

Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

S. N.

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of

commencement Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries

1 NREGA DRDA Employment 2009 11 10400

2 IAY DRDA Housing 2005 11 2350


3 Mission Mangalam DRDA Women Welfare 2011 11 9460

4 TSC DRDA Sanitation 11 10200

5 SAY District Panchayat Housing 2003 11 1452

6 WASMO GWSSB Water Supply &

Sanitation 2006 6 5120

7 JBIC Forest Department Forest & Environmental

Development 2008 10 4500

8 FDA Forest Department Forest Management 2003 10 4600

9 TASP Tribal Development

Dept. Tribal Area Development - 11 11625

10 Livelihood Enhancement Project

Shroff Foundation Livelihood Development 2010 5 2450

11 Sun-Shine Project Shroff Foundation Agriculture Development 2009 11 6455

12 Integrated Livestock Development Programme

J.K.Trust Livestock Development 2009 5 724

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

Sl no

Project

name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro watershed

Watershe

d code

s

Area under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal agency

PIA

Total cost Rs in Lacs

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

Rs in Lacs

% financial

completion

% physical

completion

1

IWMP - 13

2003-04 Simalfalia 1 500 ha Govt of India + Govt of Guj.

DWDU Vadodara

TDO Chhotaudepur

30 27.5 91.5

2 2002-03 Singla 1 500 ha Mangalbharti 20 17.4 87

3 2005-06 Gabadiya 1 500 ha TDO

Chhotaudepur 30 27.42 91.4


CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


2.1. Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management

Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The

PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. In district Vadodara Forest Department is being selected as the Project

Implementing Agency. The main office of PIA is located in Chottaudepur taluka place. Deputy conservator of Forest is bestowed the

responsibility for all the projects, henceforth he is the PIA of all projects. There are 7 projects in different taluka of Vadodara and each

project is assigned to a Nodal officer (Range forest officer). Four different offices are setup in 4 different talukas for smooth

functioning and overseeing of project work.

About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12 May 2009 in a

separate office to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is

the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (deputation from

Gujarat Forest Department), a Technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert

and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU,

Vadodara are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related

developmental activities in the district as per guidelines.

Programmes/projects of DWDU, Vadodara:

At present 20 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Vadodara district. The entry point activities of all the

seven IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Vadodara Forest Division is PIA for 13 projects. Apart

from the 20 IWMP projects, DWDU Vadodara is involved in a total of 303 pre-Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); 93 projects


are completed and 210 projects are still running in the district and are expected to complete within two years of time. The DWDU,

Vadodara is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the

district.

SWOT Analysis of the DWDU:

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team.

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and training institutes for capacity building and

technical guidance.

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar,

(5) District level advisory committee for monitoring, coordination & Co-operation.

(6) Prior acquaintance of nodal officers with the villagers of selected project area, hence ease in implementation of project.

Weakness:

(1) No permanent office building at project level.

(2) Most of the project area is hilly and distance of project area from DWDU is almost 2-3 hours.

(3) Project area inhabitants mainly composed of schedule tribe class hence, ignorance about developmental projects.

Opportunities:

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and

convergence of programmes.

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP better quality of work can be expected

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS and MIS integration of the project with the State Level Data Cell for online monitoring and

evaluation.

(4) Reputed training centres for capacity building at all level of stakeholders viz, , district, block and village level to ensure the proper

implementation of the project


Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact.

(2) Options in production system are limited due to the lack of sufficient natural resources and due to limited resource base.

(3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning.

(4) Lack of awareness of the watershed programme and its objectives.

(5) Low literacy rate in the project area.

Table no. 6: PIA:

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-13

(i) Type of organization Project Implementing Agency

(ii) Name of organization PIA, Chottaudepur (iii) Designation & Address Nodal Officer, Range Forest Office, Chottaudepur (iv) Telephone 02669-232204

(v) Fax

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

Sl no Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience

(Years) Job

assigned

Monthly remuneration

(Rs.)

1 Hardik patel 25 M WDT(ENG) Diploma civil -

8000

2 Jaypalsinh Jasvantsinh Parmar 29 M WDT (Agri.) BRS 1.5 9000

3 Karsanbhai Mansingbhai Rathwa

40 M WDT (CM) BRS 8 9000

4 Islabhai desinhbhai Rathwa 24 M WDT (DEO) BA 1.5 5000

5 Harish bhai patel 24 M WDT(ACC.) Bcom 1 6000


CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA


Geography and Geo-hydrology

Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Juna Udepur watershed is about 6189.93 ha out of which 41.45% is forest area. The forest area is

nearly covers one third of the project area. Forest areas in this region are dense to moderate. Most of the villages in this area are

surrounded by hilly and rocky mountains. About 41.70% of land is under agriculture which is completely rain-fed; mainly a Kharif

crop is taken. About 12.68% of the total land is classified under wasteland and whole is cultivable. The watershed area mostly consist

of Mahuda trees, chalori (Buchanania lanzan), teak, Ber, wild blackberry, custard apple, acacia Arabica, kusum trees, ficus and plam

tress. These trees are encouraged and grown by the villager since they generated income for the villagers from the produce obtained

through these trees.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the

village Forest Area

Land under agricultural

use Rainfed area

Permanent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Simal Faliya 611.9 0 449.9 399.8 162 162 0

2 Oliamba 510.3 104.9 344.2 315.2 20.1 20.1 41.1

3 Manka 124.3 1.6 75.8 70.8 46.9 46.9 0

4 Luni 486.5 93.7 329.1 319.1 63.7 63.7 0

5 Badvav 229.1 79.7 127.5 117.5 21.9 21.9 0

6 Bhensa 696.5 386.9 184 160.8 3.7 3.7 130.4

7 Gathiya 565 296.5 135.4 130.4 133.1 133.1 0

8 Singla 1406.3 922.5 450.2 442.2 33.6 33.6 0

9 Gabadiya 862.40 526.90 172.40 166.20 163.10 163.10 0.00

10 Juna Udepur 361.3 153.2 137.7 127.7 70.4 70.4 0

11 Padarvant 336.33 0 175.5 150.5 66.2 66.2 56

Total 6189.93 2565.9 2581.7 2400.2 784.7 784.7 227.5


Soil and topography:

Juna Udepur watershed project falls under Middle Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy silt to loamy in some places.

The soil is Medium black. The depth of soil is shallow to moderate about 25 to 80 cm. The predominant texture of soil is sandy silty

and moderately coarse texture to fine texture in some villages. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and

potash. Status of organic carbon is very poor and depleting in this region due to lack of sufficient organic resources and also largely

due to the ignorance of the farmers. Due to the low moisture index of this region organic fertility efficiency is not noteworthy. The

topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-30% slope with undulating topography and hills surround the most of the project

area.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the villages

Major soil types

Topography

a)Type b) Area in ha

1 Central Gujarat 4663.89

Simal Faliya

Medium Black 4663.89 Medium slope

Oliamba

Manka

Luni

Badvav

Bhensa

Gathiya

Singla

Gabadiya

Juna Udepur

Padarvant


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Simal Faliya

No Once in 3-4 year

2 Oliamba 3 Manka 4 Luni 5 Badvav 6 Bhensa 7 Gathiya 8 Singla 9 Gabadiya

10 Juna Udepur 11 Padarvant

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion a Sheet 830.61

25-35% b Rill 682.48

c Gully 1661.22 d Ravenous

Sub-Total 3174.31 Wind erosion 442.992 NA

Total


Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress) Simal Faliya 53,18 7.2 Inherent

Oliamba 1,87,182 7.5 Inherent Manka 3,04,209 7.4 Inherent

Luni 1,13,148 7.3 Inherent Badvav 3, 12,21 6.9 Inherent Bhensa 44,31 7 Inherent Gathiya 4,16 7.3 Inherent Singla 33,22 7.1 Inherent

Gabadiya 2,45,76 7.3 Inherent Juna Udepur 16,38,93 7.4 Inherent

Padarvant 20,67,93 7.1 Inherent

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Simal Faliya 53,18

Nil

Oliamba 1,87,182

Manka 3,04,209

Luni 1,13,148

Badvav 3, 12,21

Bhensa 44,31

Gathiya 4,16

Singla 33,22

Gabadiya 2,45,76

Juna Udepur 16,38,93

Padarvant 20,67,93


Table no.12: Climatic conditions

Name of project Year Average rainfall- last 5 years

Average temperature

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

Juna Udepur

2008-09 1002 42.9 34.8 29.4 8.2

2009-10 577 42.8 36.9 30.1 7.9

2010-11 811 42.9 33.7 29.8 7.9

2011-12 1270 43.4 34 31.1 7.8

2012-13 1150 43.8 33.9 30.2 7.1

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams

Juna Udepur 120-135 20-30 Orsang River

Land and Agriculture:

Surface water sources and limited ground water table makes farming a difficult task and scarcity of drinking water in this area is

among the major problems in almost all the villages of IWMP-13 project area. The average land holding is about 1.75 ha ranging from

1 to 5 ha. Crop failure is common problem due to insufficient and untimely rains hence, agriculture become a risky. Only kharif season

crop is taken in this area. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Maize, cotton, paddy and pulses like Redgram and black gram

in this area. 95% of the total agriculture is rainfed and based monsoon of that particular year. Rabi season only 5-10% of the land is

under cultivation in places where the irrigation sources are available. Modern agriculture practise are prevalent in these areas, use of

fertilizers and agricultural pesticides for better crop production for increased yields. However, farmers often get cheated in hands of

local vendor and obtain second grade products.


Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl no Village Total owned land

HHs giving land

on lease HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST 1 Simal Faliya 0 0 6 210 0 0 2 Oliamba 0 0 0 235 0 5 3 Manka 0 0 0 90 0 0 4 Luni 0 0 0 204 0 0 5 Badvav 0 0 0 112 0 0 6 Bhensa 0 0 0 35 0 0 7 Gathiya 0 0 0 176 0 0 8 Singla 0 0 1 251 0 0 9 Gabadiya 0 3 12 322 0 5

10 Juna Udepur 0 0 0 6 0 0 11 Padarvant 0 0 0 196 0 0

Total 0 3 19 1837 0 10

Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sl no Village Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Simal Faliya 828 268 12

2 Oliamba 303.5 63.5 2

3 Manka 376 9 0

4 Luni 421 239 0

5 Badvav 221.5 85.5 0

6 Bhensa 68.5 8 0

7 Gathiya 341.5 21 0

8 Singla 576.5 50 0

9 Gabadiya 520.5 141 4

10 Juna Udepur 12.5 4 0

11 Padarvant 357.8 125.6 0

Total 4027.3 1014.6 18


Table no. 16: Irrigation

S. N. Village

Source 1 : River Source 2 : Tube well Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area (ha.)

Gross area (ha.)

1 Simal Faliya 3 Month 13 13 3 Month 6 6 5 Month 238 250 2 Oliamba 3 Month 2.5 2.5 3 Month 2.5 2.5 4 Month 39.5 41.5 3 Manka 3 Month 1 1 - - - 3 Month 8 8 4 Luni - - - 3 Month 237 237 3 Month 2 2 5 Badvav - - - 3 Month 85.5 85.5

6 Bhensa - - - - - - 3 Month 8 8 7 Gathiya - - - - - - 3 Month 21 21 8 Singla 3 Month 2 2 - - - 3 Month 42.5 42.5 9 Gabadiya - - - 3 Month 17 17 4 Month 30 34

10 Juna Udepur - - -

11 Padarvant - - - - - - 3 Month 125.6 125.6

Table no. 17: Crop details:

S. N.

Village

Kharif (Monsoon)

Maize Cotton Tur Paddy

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)

Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)

Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)

Productivity

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)

Productivity

1 Simal Faliya 265.5 112915 425.29 341.5 92150 269.84 292.5 26475 90.51 221 97545 441.38

2 Oliamba 117.5 65450 557.02 54.5 28510 523.12 18 2510 139.44 112 49680 443.57

3 Manka 149.5 47950 320.74 90.5 38550 425.97 10.5 1680 160.00 125.5 57150 455.38

4 Luni 254 131130 516.26 49 16140 329.39 18.5 3810 205.95 104.5 53770 514.55

5 Badvav 129 77760 602.79 43.5 12420 285.52 1.5 850 566.67 37 19950 539.19

6 Bhensa 111 16900 152.25 8 2650 331.25

221 15150 68.55

7 Gathiya 172.5 98630 571.77 10.5 3000 285.71 31 5120 165.16 85.5 46450 543.27

8 Singla 264 121240 459.24 145 43560 300.41 50 6300 126.00 207.4 79860 385.05

9 Gabadiya 125 96950

180.5 32350

130 32350

178.5 75350


10 Juna Udepur 6 3400 566.67 4 700 175.00 3 400 133.33 8 3500 437.50

11 Padarvant 171.5 74010 431.55

220.5 73100 331.52

S. N. Village

Rabi Maize

Area (Ha) Production (Kg) Productivity

1 Simal Faliya 218.5 78870 360.96 2 Oliamba 52 20100 386.54 3 Manka 9 2250 250.00 4 Luni 218 113850 522.25 5 Badvav 83.5 44430 532.10 6 Bhensa 8 4400 550.00 7 Gathiya 23 14950 650.00 8 Singla 87.5 22310 254.97 9 Gabadiya 129.5 12440 323.75

10 Juna Udepur 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 Padarvant 121 54110 447.19

Livestock:

The villages have 1061 cows, 755 buffaloes, 1684 bullocks, 2184 goats and no sheeps. Livestock is owned by all almost all the

farmer for drought and agriculture purposes. Partly some people in the community depend on goat rearing for their livelihood. Cows

and buffaloes are of local breed. Mehsani buffalo and Gir cow are common in this area and the survival and production parameters

are suitable to this region and climatic condition. Hence there is wider scope for improvement of dairy in this cluster of villages of

IWMP-13. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. Milk production is so low

however this can be improved by fodder production in the wasteland in these areas. Although green fodder is only available in kharif

season, excess fodder can be dried and stored for use in off season. Country chicken has great demand as its a part of daily food and

also a source of income.


Table no. 18: Livestock

S. N. Village Cow Buffalo

Total Milk (Buffalo+Cow)

Goat Bullock Hen Others

No milk (Lit/day) No Milk

(Lit/day) (Lit/day) No Milk

1 Simal Faliya 54 1436 200 5890 7326 312 52 171

2 Oliamba 79 1033 94 1490 2523 147 186 4 116

3 Manka 100 970 17 85 1055 174 103 26

4 Luni 194 14965 145 725 15690 355 206 125

5 Badvav 68 -125 65 325 200 157 119 2 30

6 Bhensa 67 845 17 85 930 58 94 45

7 Gathiya 144 990 57 285 1275 341 389 41 94

8 Singla 158 64 61 305 369 414 294 1 95

9 Gabadiya 107 59 344 210 162 7 67

10 Juna Udepur 17 220 220 16 9 15

11 Padarvant 73 800 40 200 1000 26 15

Total 1061 21198 755 9390 30932 2184 0 1640 55 799

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no Village Ground water table

(mt) Source of drinking water

Availability in months

Quality

1 Simal Faliya 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

Good

2 Oliamba 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

3 Manka 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

4 Luni 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

5 Badvav 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well, Tap 6-9 month

6 Bhensa 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

7 Gathiya 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

8 Singla 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month

9 Gabadiya 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well, Tap 6-9 month

10 Juna Udepur 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well, Tap 6-9 month

11 Padarvant 12 - 14 mt Handpump, Well 6-9 month


Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No. Names of

project

CPR Total Area (ha)

Area available for treatment (ha) Particulars Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify) Pvt.

persons

Govt.

PRI Any other (Pl. Specify) (specify deptt.)

(specify deptt.)

1 Juna Udepur

Wasteland/ degraded land 103

Pastures 5

Orchards

Village Woodlot

Forest 18

Village Ponds/ Tanks

Community Buildings .2

Weekly Markets 2

Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship

Others (Pl. specify)

Socio-Economic Profile

Demographic Status:

IWMP-13 watershed project has a total of 2040 households with a population of 10256 (as per base-line survey) out of which

5365 are male and 4891 female .The sex ratio is 911 female to 1000 male. There are 514 BPL families. The average family size is 5.

The literacy rate is very low. People in this area are more inclined towards education as it is the best option and opportunities other

sectors are also less. The major castes in the village are rathwa, bariya, nayaka and all are Schedule tribe. Majority of population is

involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. Young children go to anganwadi schools, however majority of children show lack of

interest in education leaving most of the youth and illiterates.


Table no. 21: Demographic information

S. N. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Simal Faliya 1456 772 684 64 28 36 4.40 1392 744 648 95.60

2 Oliamba 1362 757 605 0 0 0 0.00 1362 757 605 100.00

3 Manka 576 286 290 0 0 0 0.00 576 286 290 100.00

4 Luni 1100 572 528 0 0 0 0.00 1100 572 528 100.00

5 Badvav 747 396 351 0 0 0 0.00 747 396 351 100.00

6 Bhensa 230 116 114 0 0 0 0.00 230 116 114 100.00

7 Gathiya 1080 531 549 0 0 0 0.00 1080 531 549 100.00

8 Singla 1538 801 737 0 0 0 0.00 1533 799 734 99.67

9 Gabadiya 657 340 317 0 0 0 0.00 657 340 317 100.00

10 Juna Udepur 247 130 117 0 0 0 0.00 247 130 117 100.00

11 Padarvant 1263 664 559 0 0 0 0.00 1263 664 559 100.00

Total 10256 5365 4851 64 28 36 0.62 10187 5335 4812 99.33

Sl No Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %

1 Simal Faliya 301 20.67 177 22.93 124 18.13

2 Oliamba 235 16.15 122 16.12 113 16.19

3 Manka 36 6.25 30 10.49 6 2.07

4 Luni 521 47.36 270 47.20 251 47.54

5 Badvav 277 37.08 154 38.89 123 35.04

6 Bhensa 77 33.48 44 37.93 33 28.95

7 Gathiya 312 28.89 190 35.78 122 22.22

8 Singla 398 25.88 243 30.34 155 21.03

9 Gabadiya 223 33.94 137 40.29 86 27.13

10 Juna Udepur 53 21.46 32 24.62 21 17.95

11 Padarvant 370 44.05 207 51.62 163 37.13

Total 2803 28.66 1606 32.38 1197 24.85


Migration Pattern:

Migration is a major problem of these areas. Money is the major motivation and hence people migrate during rabi and summer season

to different parts of the state like Surat, Ahmedabad, Vadodara, bhuj, Ankelshwar and Shuarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural

labours and construction workers. As soon as kharif season ends most of people tend to migrated to different places in search of

employment. People with little irrigation sources and livestock stay in the village, further during drought season 80% of the villagers

choose to migrate which leaves these villages almost empty. Regularly they migrate to same places and work as agriculture labour and

wage labour. Children are most affected as parents migrate, children are taken along them and their education is affected.

Sl no

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for

migration

Income during migration /

month Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Simal Faliya 1456 2 1 1 2 0 0

Unemployment

4000-5000 2 Oliamba 1362 2 0 2 2 0 0 4000-5000 3 Manka 576 0 0 0 0 0 0 4000-5000 4 Luni 1100 38 25 13 38 0 0 4000-5000 5 Badvav 747 10 6 4 10 0 0 4000-5000 6 Bhensa 230 8 6 2 8 0 0 4000-5000

7 Gathiya 1080 57 38 19 57 0 0 4000-5000 8 Singla 1538 146 94 52 146 0 0 4000-5000 9 Gabadiya 657 0 0 0 0 0 0 4000-5000

10 Juna Udepur 247 14 9 5 14 0 0 4000-5000 11 Padarvant 1263 7 4 3 7 0 0 4000-5000

Total 10256 284 183 101 284 0 0 4000-5000

Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total

Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land

less HH % of land less HH

0-16 16-20 Total

1 Simal Faliya 279 17 17 6.09 63 22.58

2 Oliamba 243 33 33 13.58 0 0.00

3 Manka 101 22 22 21.78 11 10.89

4 Luni 206 20 20 9.71 2 0.97


5 Badvav 117 59 59 50.43 5 4.27

6 Bhensa 36 12 12 33.33 1 2.78

7 Gathiya 183 90 90 49.18 7 3.83

8 Singla 275 137 137 49.82 23 8.36

9 Gabadiya 116 13 13 11.21 0 0.00

10 Juna Udepur 50 43 43 86.00 39 78.00

11 Padarvant 222 68 68 30.63 7 3.15

Total 1828 514 0 514 361.76 158 134.83

Infrastructure facilities:

The villages have electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 40 per cent of households in the

village have their personal electric meters. Almost all of the villages in this cluster have primary schools. For middle and higher

secondary education, the students have to go to chottaudepur a market place and a mini town which is about 15-20 kilometres away

on an average from the almost all the villages this particular cluster. However, most of the youngster travel this distance on daily basis

to obtain a better education facilities. Most of these do not have any primary health care centre for which villagers have to go to

chottaudepur taluka place which is 15-20Kms. Some of the villages come under a Group Panchayat with Panchayat as mentioned in

Table no 1 of basic project information.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sl no Village

Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges

(Number)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number

)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperati

ve (Number

)

Other cooperative

s / CBIs (Number)

Any other

institution LP UP HS

1 Simal Faliya N Y N N N N N 22 N N N N

2 Oliamba N Y N N N N N 25 N N N N

3 Manka N Y N N N N N 16 N N N N

4 Luni N Y N N N N N 20 N N N N

5 Badvav N Y N N N N N 20 N N N N

6 Bhensa N Y N N N N N 16 N N N N


7 Gathiya N Y N N N N N 15 N N N N

8 Singla N Y N N N N N 21 N N N N

9 Gabadiya N Y N N N N N 20 N N N N

10 Juna Udepur N Y N N N N N 17 N N N N

11 Padarvant N Y N N N N N 20 N N N N

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets

Sl no Village

HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set HHs with

cooking gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Simal Faliya Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

2 Oliamba Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

3 Manka Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

4 Luni Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

5 Badvav Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

6 Bhensa Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

7 Gathiya Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

8 Singla Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

9 Gabadiya Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

10 Juna Udepur Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

11 Padarvant Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage

labourers in Surat and surastra and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. As this area is abundant with local palm trees, in

off-season women tend to sell the extract from these trees locally known as nira a semi alcoholic natural drink consumed by the

localities to sustain from the heat waves of summer. This is also one of the subsidiary income sources for the villager especially in

summer season. Income is irregular and absolutely no scope for saving for future use. This leads to lending from local sources. Things

get worst when barrowed amount is not paid on time.


Table no. 27: Per capita Income

Sl no Village Agriculture Forestry Animal

husbandry Casual labor Services Handicraft Others Total 1 Simal Faliya 9543 0 5427 0 0 0 0 14970 2 Oliamba 6068 1043 5339 1090 0 0 0 13540 3 Manka 7045 1400 6230 0 0 0 0 14675 4 Luni 8040 950 4560 1250 0 0 0 14800 5 Badvav 7565 830 4500 955 0 0 0 13850 6 Bhensa 7143 1590 5067 1550 0 0 0 15350 7 Gathiya 6045 1340 6370 945 0 0 0 14700 8 Singla 5987 2045 4328 870 0 0 0 13230 9 Gabadiya 4636 0 9324 1140 0 0 0 15100

10 Juna Udepur 6564 1567 5549 1550 0 0 0 15230 11 Padarvant 6330 1345 6450 860 0 0 0 14985

Total 74966 12110 63144 10210 0 0 0 160430

Dependence on Common Property Resource

The majority of the people of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand-to-

mouth existence. Based upon the rainfall data of past few years the rainfall of this area is increasingly decreasing due to which

agriculture is become a major constraint. Availability of little moisture is also insufficient for the development of pasture lands this

trend seems to continue year by year making the natural resources in this depleting at a faster rate. Drinking water is also scarce in

this region and water table in most of the wells going deeper day by day. One of the prominent features of all these villages in this

cluster is dependence on common property resources. Trees of mahuda, medicinal plants, wild herbs and spices are abundant in

this area and yearly people tend to year Rs.3000-3500 per family in summer season. Two main products are mahuda flowers and

mahuda seeds. First is Mahuda flowers when fermented releases great amounts of alcohol hence, flowers are sold in the near markets

which are exported to different states. Secondly seed cotyledons of mahuda have a good amount of fatty acids which turns into oil

after it is allowed from oil extraction process. This extracted oil is used for household purposes which is a good source of nutrition.


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no Village Timru Pan

Mahuda

Gum

Total income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Simal Faliya 20 4200 29 15000 7 1500 20700

2 Oliamba 23 8000 25 21500 14 5000 34500

3 Manka 20 4200 29 15000 7 1500 20700

4 Luni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Badvav 24 6500 26 18000 11 3000 27500

6 Bhensa 20 4200 29 15000 7 1500 20700

7 Gathiya 22 5000 28 16500 7 1700 23200

8 Singla 20 4200 29 15000 7 1500 20700

9 Gabadiya 0 0 40 8900 0 0 8900

10 Juna Udepur 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Padarvant 0 0 40 10000 0 0 10000

Sl no Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH) Agriculture +

AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1 Simal Faliya 874 279 56 97 7 0 0 0 2 Oliamba 873 205 16 67 134 1 0 3 3 Manka 346 91 10 43 48 0 0 0 4 Luni 660 206 68 68 37 0 1 20 5 Badvav 448 115 12 34 65 1 1 9 6 Bhensa 138 35 9 29 7 1 0 18 7 Gathiya 648 162 19 84 33 15 1 42 8 Singla 923 251 14 76 100 0 0 91 9 Gabadiya 1098 292 48 156 158 3 1 1

10 Juna Udepur 148 47 0 13 26 0 0 9 11 Padarvant 504 147 5 58 53 1 2 4

Total 6660 1830 257 725 668 22 6 197


This shows the livelihood pattern of these particular villagers about 27% are solely engaged in agriculture activities, 19%

agriculture plus animal husbandry, 22% causal cum agri labour, 16 % in animal husbandry exclusively, 10% in services, 4% in handy

crafts works and 1% in others. As shown in this figure it can be understood that primary occupation of this cluster is agriculture and

followed by casual labour, which is why most of the people migrate to distant parts of Gujarat in search of labour works during off

season. Animal husbandry comes next to casual labour, which is not much improved due to lack of fodder and improved breeds hence,

based upon the available resources from locally and from common property resources the livelihood activities were planned keeping

in view the pro and cons this clusters.

Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World:

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output

per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated

area under that crop.”

In order to assess the status of agricultural crops of the project area it is very crucial to have data of that particular geography

and its agriculture profile to make a comparative analysis. Hence different sources of data like Baseline survey (for Chotta udepur

villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture

(Vadodara) on production and productivity are obtained. Based upon the production and productivity data the gap can be understood

in comparison with project villages, taluka place, district, state, country and world. The projection on the graphs is relative

comparison of productivity of different places this is in order to understand the gaps in the productivity and to find the plausible

solution for increasing the potential to an extent possible.

Crop Details of Project area:

Crop 1: Maize


WorldCountry

StateDistrict

talukaProject

area

4182

20241481

1100925

820

Maize productivity(kg/ha.)

India is the fifth largest producer of maize in the world contributing 3% of the global production. In India, maize is grown in all the

seasons i.e., kharif, rabi and summer. Of these three seasons, nearly 90% of the production is from kharif season, 10-12% during rabi

season and remaining 1-2% during summer season. Since the maize is rain dependent, it is mainly grown during kharif season. Maize

Area, Production and Yield in India have seen a phenomenal growth over the last five decades and India has emerged from being a net

importer to levels of self sufficiency. In the last five decades, India’s maize production has increased from less than 3 million tons to 15

million tons today. This is because of growth in technology coupled with rising demand for the produce. Diversified uses of maize also

prompted higher production in the country. Presently, in India, maize is mainly used for preparation of poultry feed and extraction of

starch. Out of total arrivals to the mandis nearly 75% of the produce is bought by the poultry feed manufacturers and 20% is

purchased by the starch extractors.

Tribal belt of chottaudepur taluka has a good potential for agriculture, the productivity of maize is one among high in chottaudepur

taluka in comparsion to entire state and its leading in term of productivity. Maize is one of the major cereals crops grown in this

project area and taluka place of chottaudepur. Mazie staple food crop in this region and 8 villages of project area are designated as

tribal villages and their majority of people depend upon mazie as food crop. Maize crop is also encouraged by many private agri-

business companies like Monsanto, Pineor and dhanuka. NGO’s

like shrrof Foudation is also involved in project named

“SUNSHINE” which involves distribution of seeds. During

migration people tend to carry foods grains from their

own field.

Fig.1 Comparative data of project, Block, District, State

and country of Maize

The world productivity of Maize is 4182 kg/ha. In India, it is

grown in about 6290 lakh hectares with a production of

10303 lakh tonnes and productivity of 2024 kg/ha. Gujarat is


one of the lowest producing states in India with a 1481 kg/ha

productivity, Vadodara district productivity being 1100.

Chottaudepur block has very good productivity of 925 kg/ha.

The productivity of the project area is 820 kg/ha which is

less in comparsion to the district. Hence, with proper

solution the gaps can be minimized through modern

agriculture practises.

Crop 2: Paddy

In India, rice accounts for 22 per cent of the total cropped

area under cereals. The most significant achievement of the

post independent era is the transformation from chronic

deficit to self-sufficiency. The per capita net availability of

rice (provisional) has increased from about 150 kg in 1950 to 225 kg in 1990, in spite of growing population. The rice area has shrunk

from 2.52 million hectares in 1960 to about 2.20 million hectares in 1998-99, but the production has increased from 3.5 million

tonnes to about 8.2 million tonnes in 1998-99 and ranked first in national productivity with 2278 kg/ha. World is kg/ha 3033, Gujarat

1699 kg/ha, district Vadodara 1125 kg/ha, chottaudepur 1000 kg/ha and project area is 620 kg/ha. We can see the gap in the

productivity of project area. This is mainly due to the lack of irrigation facilities, traditional verities pest and disease incidence. The

difference can be animated by different innovative techniques of crop demonstration to create awareness of fertilizer use, pesticides

and different tillage practices for increasing productivity of paddy.

Crop 3: Cotton

Cotton often referred as "White gold" has been in cultivation in India for more than five thousand years. He cotton required for the

purpose of manufacturing yarn is cultivated in about 9 million hectares of land in India and thus India ranks first in the world. In

India, cotton is grown over an area of about 9 million hectares and provides livelihood for over 4 million farming families. The

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

World State District taluka Project area

3033

1699

11251000

620

Series1


productivity of cotton is very low in India but still it stands

first in production of cotton after china and USA. The

productivity of cotton is comparatively good in the project

area and chottaudepur block has productivity with 425

kg/ha . Hence this difference has been improved with

innovative agricultural practices to an extent. Productivity

details of project area of cotton is 376 kg/ha.

It is observed that in recent years there is raise in net

cropping area under cotton crop, this is mainly due to the

innovate seed technology such as BT cotton (Bacillus

turengenises) which has considerable decreased the use of

pesticide by 50%. Cotton being cash crops fetches more

returns and more and more farmers are inclined towards cotton crops. Agriculture department also involved in increasing the yields

The productivity of Project area is low due to following reasons:

i) Full dependence on monsoon:

Project villages village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation

facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon

determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate.

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertiliJuna

fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

World Country State District taluka Project area

690

488

774

534

425376

Cotton productivity(kg/ha.)


iii) Traditional farming methods:

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as

multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors

contribute to low productivity.

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers in Chottaudepur project use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate

machinery like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.

v) Lack of finances for farmers:

In Chottaudepur most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery

and other inputs.

vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizer:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. In project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated

condition. But in project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In Chottaudepur mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizer especially

urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.

vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local

traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have

proper storage facilities.


CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES


Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low

literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific

approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next

generation watershed development.

Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The IWMP-13 Project

consists of seven micro- watersheds namely 5D1B7b1a, 5D1B7b1e, 5D1B7b1b, 5D1B7b1c, 5D1B7b1d, 5D1B7b2h, 5D1B7b2j,

5D1B7b2c as their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri.

Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village.

This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household,

cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their

benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in

the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.


iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous

input to focus on creating accountability of the

stakeholders towards the programme. This has created

an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities

and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory

approach provides a new path for planning,

implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal

activities with a complete accountability of the

stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource

mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were

used to understand the physical and social orientation of

the village in general and watershed in specific. These

tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated

questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn

Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations

(apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers.

Focus Group Discussion with women:

Community mobilization expert has carried out the FGD with women in order to understand various issues related to their day to day

life. PRA tools such as time line, daily activity chart, details of SHG’s, details of common property resources, seasonal health problems,

girl child education, problems of agriculture and seasonal charts were discussed. In this discussion women were encouraged to speak

about their problem. The women who drew these charts described the differences between the rainy and dry season patterns. In the

dry season, it took longer to get water from the well and collecting firewood to stockpile for the rainy season. When the rains come,

things are much busier and the women's days are much longer because of all the work to be done in the fields.


Focus Group Discussion with Women

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-

morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These

were all given proper weight age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope

percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Contour Map of

vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation

structures. Land parcel number of those particular villages is provided in order to understand the drainage, slope and stream

in that area. Selection of site can be marked on the maps with help of survey number of that village map.


c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This

model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to

remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria

was used

(A) Planning Cluster approach Yes Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes Hydro-geological survey Yes Contour mapping Yes Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Ridge to Valley treatment Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes 2. Village boundaries Yes 3. Drainage Yes 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 5. Land use Yes 6. Ground water status Yes 7. Watershed boundaries Yes


8. Activity Yes Crop simulation models# No Integrated coupled analysis/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No Weather Station

(B) Inputs No 1. Bio-pesticides No 2. Organic manures Yes 3. Vermi compost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer No 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing Yes 8. Nutrient budgeting No 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify)

Institution building:

The watershed development project has great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community.

Considering the needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved

in a skills up gradation programme. People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable

development and social equity. Such organizations must have representations from representations from socially backward

communities and women with separate special interest groups. Within group interactions across group interactions and

representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged groups to become a part of mainstream

development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the resources developed at the

community level.


Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

S. N. Name of the PRA Activity / FGD

Date Number of people present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Village Mapping Identification of the Village infrastructure eg. Gram Panchayat, PHC, School, Temple, Co-Ope., Electric facility, Road Connectivity, Banking facility etc.

2 Social Mapping Identification of the community & their residence. Mostly Scattered Houses of village people.

3 Resource Mapping Identification of the resources in the village eg. River, Pond, Forest, Waste/ Degraded land , Pasture land, Existing Structure, Canal, etc.

4 Matrix Ranking Identification of needs with their priority. Mostly villagers are thirsty for drinking & irrigation water, Pucca House, Agriculture & AH related latest guidance with benefits, etc.

5 Transect Walk & FGD

(1) Agriculture: Major problem- Low irrigation facility, Undulating land with medium slope, low soil productivity & fertility, Lack of latest agricultural technologies, Availability of good market & product revenue, etc. (2) Animal Husbandry: Major Problem- Local breed having low milk productivity, Very less fodder & nutritive feed availability, Mostly unavailability of Dairy Co-operative & chilling centre, Less communication with veterinary hospital, etc. (3) Forest: Forest area in this project is less having medium vegetative cover, so income from forest is very less, etc. (4) Engineering: Major Problem- Maximum Soil & Water erosion as mostly undulating land, and so very deep ground water level, Many Gully, Rill formation, etc. (5) General: Major Problem- As the project are is very backward mostly people's health is very poor, Migration is very serious issue for this area's family, etc.


i) Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village.

This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed

committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the villages of

IWMP-13 project area. The IWMP-13 is a cluster of 11 villages with 7 Gram panchayats. Hence 7 main Watershed Committees and 4

sub-watershed committees are formed at village keeping all parameter of watershed committee keeping the gender sensitive issues

intact. Watershed committee member are briefed about the project objectives and a workshop is also conducted a in this regard at

every village.

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.

Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details

Sl. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a

Society (dd/m

m/ yyyy)

Name of WC Member

Designation

M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG

GP

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

1 Simal Faliya

Under process

Rathva Arvindbhai Fatubhai

President M ST SF

SimalFaliya 12thpass

Works of Evaluation

Rathva Sunilbhai Rushlabhai

Vice-President M ST LF B.A

Rathva Govindbhai Jagubhai Secretary M ST MF B.A

Status Of Project Detail

Rathva Dinubhai Ambubhai Member M ST LF 7th Pass

Rathva Chandubhai Jentibhai Member M ST SF 10

Rathva Tersingbhai Namlabhai Member M ST SF Illiterate


Rathva Bajiben Naginbhai Member F ST SF

SHG 12th Pass

Rathva Kamlaben Narsighbhai Member F ST MF

UGS 10th Pass

Rohit Zaverbhai Karshanbhai Member M SC LF 2th pass

Rathva Nitaben Ramanbhai Member F ST LF 12th Pass

Harijan Kanubhai Naykadabhai Member M SC LL

Rathva Karshanbhai Mansighbhai

WDT(Member) M ST BRS

Community

2 Singla Under

process

Rathva Kalpeshbhai Gamjibhai President M ST MF

Singla 12thpass

Works of Evaluation

Rathva Desingbhai Mithubhai

Vice-President M ST LL 2th pass

Rathva Ravlabhai Revjibhai Secretary M ST MF 12thpass


Rathva Gulsingbhai Kandubhai Member M ST MF UG 4thPass

Rathva Kachudiyabhai Revlabhai Member M ST MF 3th Pass

Rathva Ramsingbhai Natubhai Member M ST 3th Pass

Rathva Rashliben Sunjibhai Member F ST

SHG 5th pass

Rathva Champaben Rangesingbhai Member F ST 4thPass

Nayka Navinbhai Magatabhai Member M ST

LL 5th pass

Rathva Shaniben Chimanbhai Member F ST Illiterate

Rathva Karshanbhai M.


Community


3 Gabad

iya Under

process

Rathva Varshanbhai Narsingbhai President M ST

Gabaiya 4thPass

Works of Evaluation

Rathva Savjibhai Mohanbhai

Vice-President M ST 12thpass

Rathva Lavingbhai Fuljibhai Secretary M ST 12thpass


Nayka Parsingbhai Gamjibhai Member M ST 5th pass

Rathva Bhiladabhai Gordhanbhai Member M ST Illiterate

Rathva Sitaben Shankarbhai Member F ST

SHG 12thpass

Rathva Sakuntlaben Malsingbhai Member F ST 10thpass

Rathva Varshanbhai Mansingbhai Member M ST 5th pass

Rathva Metarbhai Nanlabhai Member M ST

Illiterate

Rathva Nankabhai Ramsingbhai Member F ST UG Illiterate

Rathva Karshanbhai M .


Community

ii ) Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Men can

also be member in SHG if it serves the common objective of the group.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came

up with the following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Schemes like Sakhi mandal and SGSY are already operation at the village level but not to full extend.


c) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

d) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

e) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

After a discussion through PRA and other foucus groupd discussion with villagers and local authorities of taluka panchayat and

other developmental department, it was known that lack of awareness to villagers regarding such facilities and also due to the

lengthy procedure of financial institutions has also become a major constraint.

Table no. 33: SHG detail

S. No.

Name of village Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women With both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Male Female SC/ST SC/ST APL/BPL APL/BPL

1 Simal Faliya

0 1 0 1

(i) Landless

- 0 - - - - - - -

(ii) SF - 1 - - 1 1 - 1 1

(iii) MF - 3 - - 3 3 - 3 3

(iv) LF - 7 - - 7 7 - 7 7

Total - 11 - - 11 11 - 11 11

2 Oliamba 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

1 1 1 1 1

(ii) SF 2 2 2 2 2

(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 5

(iv) LF 2 2 2 2 2

Total 10 10 10 10 10

3 Manka 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

4 4 4 4 4

(ii) SF 2 2 2 2 2

(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 5


(iv) LF

Total 11 11 11 11 11

4 Luni 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 4 4 4 4 4

(iii) MF 4 4 4 4 4

(iv) LF 3 3 3 3 3

Total 11 11 11 11 11

5 Badvav 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 5 5 5 5 5

(iii) MF 6 6 6 6 6

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0

Total 11 11 11 11 11

6 Bhensa 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

1 1 1 1 1

(ii) SF 3 3 3 3 3

(iii) MF 7 7 7 7 7

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0

Total 11 11 11 11 11

7 Pandarvant 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

3 3 3 3 3

(ii) SF 2 2 2 2 2

(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 5

(iv) LF 1 1 1 1 1

Total 11 11 11 11 11

8 Singla 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 7 7 7 7 7

(iii) MF 4 4 4 4 4

(iv) LF

Total 11 11 11 11 11


9 Gabadiya 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 4 4 4 4 4

(iii) MF 7 7 7 7 7

(iv) LF

Total 11 11 11 11 11

10 Junaudepur 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 11 11 11 11 11

(iv) LF

Total 11 11 11 11 11

11 Ganthiya 1 0 0 1

(i) Landless

3 3 3 3 3

(ii) SF 5 5 5 5 5

(iii) MF 3 3 3 3 3

(iv) LF

Total 11 11 11 11 11

User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group

collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table no. 34: UG detail

S. No. Name of village

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Simal 3 1 1 5 (i)Landless


Faliya (ii) SF 3 3 3 3

(iii) MF 4 4 4 4 2 2

(iv) LF 8 8 8 8 0 0

Total 5 15 0 15 15 0 15 2 2

2 Oliamba 10 3 4 17

(i)Landless

(ii) SF 19 19 19 19

(iii) MF 38 38 38 38 9 9

(iv) LF 5 5 5 5 1 1

Total 17 62 62 62 62 10 10

3 Manka 12 3 5 20

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 22 22 22 22

(iii) MF 40 0 40 40 0 40 14 14

(iv) LF 1 1 1 1 0 0

Total 20 63 0 63 63 0 63 14 14

4 Luni 9 5 2 16

(i)Landless

(ii) SF 15 15 15 15

(iii) MF 35 35 35 35 26 26

(iv) LF 4 4 4 4 0 0

Total 16 54 54 54 54 26 26

5 Badvav 1 1 2 4

(i)Landless

(ii) SF

(iii) MF 33 1 34 33 1 34 12 0 12

(iv) LF 16 16 16 16 0 0

Total 4 49 1 50 49 1 50 12 0 12

6 Bhensa 1 0 1 2

(i)Landless

(ii) SF

(iii) MF 12 12 12 12 4 4

(iv) LF 33 33 33 33 0 0

Total 2 45 45 45 45 4 4

7 Ganthiya 1 1 2 4

(i)Landless

(ii) SF

(iii) MF 22 1 23 22 1 23 12 0 12

(iv) LF 32 32 32 32 0 0 0

Total 4 54 1 55 54 1 55 15 0 15

8 Singla 1 0 1 2 (i)Landless

(ii) SF


(iii) MF 32 32 32 32 14 14

(iv) LF 13 13 13 13 0 0

Total 2 45 45 45 45 14 14

9 Pandarvant 1 1 2 4

(i)Landless

(ii) SF

(iii) MF 20 1 21 20 1 21 2 0 2

(iv) LF 12 12 12 12 0 0

Total 4 32 1 33 32 1 33 2 0 2

10 Juna

Udepur 1 0 1 2

(i)Landless (ii) SF

(iii) MF 26 26 26 26 0 0

(iv) LF 9 9 9 9 0 0

Total 2 35 35 35 35 0 0

11 Gabadiya 1 0 1 2

(i)Landless (ii) SF

(iii) MF 11 11 11 11 3 3

(iv) LF 6 6 6 6 0 0

Total 2 17 17 17 17 3 3

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community to make them to feel the presence

at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A

group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that

a particular amount was allotted for EPA activity for each of their villages, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers

discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities

can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of

convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.


Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr No. Project Name Name of Village Total Area (Ha.) Amount for Entry Point

Activities in Rs. Name of Activity

1 2 3 4 5 6 1

Juna Udepur (IWMP - 13)

Simal Faliya 99.90 0.48 New Handpump

2 Juna Udepur 360.10 1.73 Protection Wall

3 Manka (Chho.) 121.56 0.58 New Handpump

4 Gabadiya 360.95 1.73 Bore with motor

5 Singala 905.30 4.35 New Handpump

Protection Wall

6 Luni 483.25 2.32 Causeway on Connecting Road

7 Badvav 228.70 1.10 Causeway on Connecting Road

8 Ganthiya 562.00 2.70 Causeway on Connecting Road

9 OliAmba 510 2.45 Causeway on Connecting Road

10 Padharvant 336.33 1.61 Causeway on Connecting Road

11 Bhensha 695.5 3.34 Causeway on Connecting Road

TOTAL 4663.89 19.05

Watershed Development Works:

Watershed work phase is the core component of the project. Creating permanent structures as required the slope, geology and

topography starting from ridge to valley to conserve rain water at point of its incidence with ground. Trapping the water resources at

right place at right time can great increase the effectiveness of this project. The objective being reclamation of natural resources and

creating sustainability to assets created under this project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached

towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in

IWMP-13 watershed. For the ridge area treatment of IWMP-13 watersheds following structure are been Proposed after interaction

between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest and MDT and WDT engineer.


a. Graded Bunding

b. Gully Plug

a. Graded Bunding:

“Graded bunds or graded terraces or channel terraces are the bunds or terraces laid along a pre-determined longitudinal grade very

near the contour but not exactly along contour”.

Suitability:

The graded bunds, commonly used are comparable to the narrow base terraces. They are used for the safe, disposal of excess runoff

high rainfall areas and rigious where the [Clay] soil is relatively impervious. Farming operations are not done on bunds or bund

channels.

Function:

1. These terraces act primarily as drainage channel to regulate and conduct runoff at non erosive velocity.

2. To make the runoff water to trickle rather than to rush out.

b. Gully Plunge:

The portion where the stream begins, the structure is constructed with arranging loose boulder perpendicular to the flow of water is

called gully plunge.

Benefits:

A. Prevents soil erosion of land and reduces the flow of water and further prevents the formation of new streams.

B. Very useful in moisture conservation and reduces the scroucing and desiltation of the streams.

Land Development

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water

conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from

National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures are been proposed in these areas


Farm Bunds:

Bunding, also called a bund wall, is the area within a structure designed to prevent inundation or breaches of various types. Field

bunding is one of the important structures which check the runoff of water from the Farm level. Often Farm are left without proper

bunding, water freely flows out of the Farm and scope for percolation is almost negligible. Hence Farm bunding plays a important role in

conservation of moisture at Farm level. As the multi-tier approach ridge to valley, drainage line treatment and land development Farm

bund fall in the third agenda.

Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*

S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line

(iii) (i) (ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl. specif

y)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected year of completion

(D) Land

dev. (L) Pri-vate

M W O T

1 Ganthiya

Check wall

D

33 21.318 14.212

35.53 2016-17

Farm bunding

L

928 0.70156 0.46771

1.16927 2016-17

Gully plug

L

170.91 0.54349 0.36232

0.90581 2016-17

Stone Bund R

31.5 0.10017 0.06678

0.16695 2016-17

Total

22.663 15.109

37.772 2016-17

2 Manka

Check dam

D

2 1.896 1.264

3.16 2016-17

Gully plug

L

13 0.516 0.344

0.86 2016-17

Farm bunding

L

1238 0.936 0.624

1.56 2016-17

Check wall

D

4 1.584 1.056

2.64 2016-17

Total

4.91 3.3

8.21 2016-17

3 Simalfali

ya

Gully plug

L

88.29 0.28076 0.18718

0.46794 2016-17

Stone Bund R

192.6 0.61247 0.40831

1.02078 2016-17

Check dam

D

1 1.152 0.768

1.92 2016-17

Check wall

D

3 1.98 1.32

3.3 2016-17

Total

4.0252 2.6835

6.7087 2016-17


4 Gabadiya

Gully plug

L

85.86 0.27304 0.18202

0.45506 2016-17

Check dam

D

3 5.76 3.84

9.6 2016-17

Farm bund

L

1825 1.524 1.016

2.54 2016-17

Check wall

D

14 7.0092 4.6728

11.682 2016-17

Total

14.552 9.7048

24.277 2016-17

5 Luni

Gully plug

L

188.73 0.60016 0.40011

1.00027 2016-17

Pakka GP

L

64 3.264 2.176

5.44 2016-17

Farm bund

L

1714 1.296 0.864

2.16 2016-17

Check dam

D

1 1.728 1.152

2.88 2016-17

Check wall

D

18 12.5928 8.3952

20.988 2016-17

Total

19.481 12.987

32.468 2016-17

6 Badvav

Gully plug

L

40.5 0.12879 0.08586

0.21465 2016-17

Stone Bund R

250 0.795 0.53

1.325 2016-17

Check dam

D

2 2.16 1.44

3.6 2016-17

Check wall

D

15 6.138 4.092

10.23 2016-17

Total

9.2218 6.1479

15.37 2016-17

7 Singla

Gully plug

L

310.23 0.98653 0.65769

1.64422 2016-17

Stone Bund R

3412 10.848 7.232

18.08 2016-17

Farm bund

L

3619 2.736 1.824

4.56 2016-17

Check dam

D

5 7.488 4.992

12.48 2016-17

Check wall

D

25 14.808 9.872

24.68 2016-17

Total

36.504 24.336

61.44

8 Bhensa

Gully plug

L 4 5.832 3.888 9.72 2016-17

Farm bund R 235 0.75 0.5 1.25 2016-17

Check dam

D 3659 2.766 1.844 4.61 2016-17

Check wall

D 28 18.732 12.488 31.22 2016-17

Total

28.08 18.72 46.8 2016-17

9 Oliamba

Gully plug

L 124 2.352 1.568

3.92 2016-17

Farm bund

L 5206 3.936 2.624

6.56 2016-17

Check dam

D 2 2.592 1.728

4.32 2016-17

Check wall(cc)

D 16 11.682 7.788

19.47 2016-17

Total

20.562 13.708 34.27 2016-17


10 Pandarva

nt

Gully plug

L 69 0.222 0.148

0.37 2016-17

Stone Bund R 38 0.12 0.08

0.2 2016-17

Farm Bunds

L 3655 2.76 1.84

4.6 2016-17

Check dam

D 2 2.844 1.896

4.74 2016-17

Check wall(cc)

D 11 7.614 5.076

12.69 2016-17

Total

13.56 9.04 22.6 2016-17

11 Juna

udepur

Gully plug

L

179.01 0.56925 0.3795

0.94875 2016-17

Farm Bunds

L

2350 1.7766 1.1844

2.961 2016-17

Check dam

D

4 4.752 3.168

7.92 2016-17

Check wall

D

16 7.4052 4.9368

12.342 2016-17

Total

14.517 9.6783

24.17 2016-17

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Village name

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

yin CMT

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacit

y

Estimated cost

1 Ganthiya Check wall - - - - 33 35.53 0 0 35.53

Check dam - - - - 0 0 0 0 0

Total - - - - 33 0 0 35.53 0 0 35.53

2 Manka Check wall - - - - 6 2.64 0 0 2.64

Check dam - - - - 2 3.16 0 0 3.16

Total - - - - 8 0 0 5.8 0 0 5.8

3 Simalfaliya Check wall - - - - 3 3.3 0 0 3.3

Check dam - - - - 1 1.92 0 0 1.92

Total - - - - 4 0 0 5.22 0 0 5.22


4 Gabadiya Check wall - - - - 14 11.68 0 0 11.68

Check dam - - - - 3 9.6 0 0 9.6

Total - - - - 17 0 0 21.28 0 0 21.28

5 Luni Check wall - - - - 18 20.09 0 0 20.09

Check dam - - - - 1 2.88 0 0 2.88

Total - - - - 19 0 0 22.97 0 0 22.97

6 Badvav Check wall - - - - 15 10.23 0 0 10.23

Check dam - - - - 2 3.6 0 0 3.6

Total - - - - 17 0 0 13.83 0 0 13.83

7 Singla Check wall - - - - 25 30.175 0 0 30.175

Check dam - - - - 5 10.32 0 0 10.32

Total - - - - 30 0 0 40.495 0 0 40.495

8 Bhensa Check wall - - 9.72 - 28 31.22 0 0 31.22

Check dam - - 31.22 - 4 9.72 0 0 9.72

Total - - - - 4 0 0 40.94 0 0 40.94

9 Oliamba Check wall - - - - 16 19.47 0 0 19.47

Check dam - - - - 2 4.32 0 0 4.32

Total - - - - 9 0 0 23.79 0 0 23.79

10 Pandarvan

t Check wall

- - - - 11 12.69 0 0 12.69

Check dam - - - - 2 4.74 0 0 4.74

Total - - - - 21 0 0 17.43 0 0 17.43

11 Juna

Udepur Check wall

- - - - 12.34 11.68 0 0 11.68

Check dam - - - - 3 6.12 0 0 6.12

Total - - - - 15.34 0 0 17.8 0 0 17.8

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. N. Name of Project Type of structures Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target


No. Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

1 Baroli NS IWMP-14 (i)Open wells

NIL NIL NIL (ii)Bore wells

(iii)Any others

(Pl. specify)

Total for the Project - - - - - - - - -

Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

S. No. Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG Estimated

cost

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii) SHG (iii) Others (pl. specify)

1 Simalfalia

A. Production Systems 1. Agri-Horticulture Crop Demonstration

(Cotton/Maize/Rice/Tur)- (Acre)

P UG 0.18 2016-17

Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.25 2016-17 Drip Irrigation Plot P UG 1.98 2016-17

2. Dairy Development Cattle Camp C UG 0.9 2016-17

B. Micro Enterprise for Assestless

Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.12 2016-17


TOTAL 4.43

2 Bhensa

A. Production Systems 1. Agri-Horticulture

Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net-House P

UG 2

Growing of Creeper Vegetables through Madap System (1000

Sq.m.) P UG 1.92 2016-17

Crop Demonstration (Cotton/Maize/Rice/Tur)-

(Acre) P UG 1.08 2016-17


2. Dairy Development Fodder Plot (Acre) P UG 0.72 2016-17

Cattle Camp C UG 0.9 2016-17 B. Micro Enterprise for

Assestless

Vermicompost Unit P

SHG 2.4

Dal cum Floor mill P

SHG 1.8

Farm Implement (Rotavator) P

SHG 1

Cotton picking machine P

0.8 2016-17 TOTAL 21.05

3 Oliamba


Raising of Vegetable Seedlings in Net-House

P UG 1 2016-17

Growing of Creeper Vegetables Through Mandap System (1000

Sq.m.) P UG 1.44 2016-17

Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1 2016-17 Crop Demonstration


P UG 0.9 2016-17

Drip Irrigation Plot P UG 3.96 2016-17 2. Dairy Development

Fodder Plot (Acre) P UG 0.36 2016-17 Cattle Camp C UG 0.9 2016-17



Cotton picking machine P

0.48

Flour cum Rice Mill-1 P

SHG 1.8

Farm Implement (Rotavator) P SHG 1 2016-17 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.08 2016-17

TOTAL 14.92

4 Juna Udepur



P UG 1 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 1.44 2016-17


(Acre) P UG 0.54 2016-17



Fodder Plot (Acre) P C UG 0.24 2016-17 B. Micro Enterprise for

Assestless

Dal-cum-Floor Mill P SHG 1.8 2016-17 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.6 2016-17

TOTAL 10.99

5 Gabadiya



P UG 1


Sq.m.) P UG 0.48


(Acre) P UG 0.54 2016-17

Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 1


Drip Irrigation Plot P UG 3.96 2016-17 2. Dairy Development

Cattle Camp C UG 0.9 2016-17 Fodder Plot (Acre) P C UG 0.36 2016-17


Dal cum Floor mill P SHG 1.8 Farm Implement (Rotavator) P UG 1

Vermicompost Unit P SHG 0.8 2016-17 TOTAL 11.84

6 Pandarvant



P UG 1 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 0.48 2016-17


(Acre) P UG 0.54 2016-17

Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG .75 2016-17 Drip Irrigation Plot P UG 3.96 2016-17



Assestless

Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.76 2016-17 Cotton picking machine P UG 0.8 2016-17

TOTAL 10.67

7 Singla



P UG 2 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 1.92 2016-17

Crop Demonstration P UG 0.9 2016-17






Assestless

Dal cum Floor mill P SHG 1.8 2016-17 Mahuda Oil Extraction Unit P SHG 1.5 2016-17

Farm Implement (Thresher) P UG 2 2016-17 Cotton picking machine P UG 0.72 2016-17

Agri mall P SHG 3 2016-17 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 1.76 2016-17

TOTAL UG 25.88

8 Luni



P UG 1 2016-17


(Acre) P UG 0.9 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 1.92 2016-17

Horticulture Plot (Acre) P UG 0.75 2016-17 Drip Irrigation Plot (Acre) P UG 3.96 2016-17



Assestless

Dal cum Floor mill P SHG 1.8 2016-17 Cotton picking machine P UG 0.64 2016-17


9 Badvav A. Production Systems


1. Agri-Horticulture Crop Demonstration


P UG 0.72 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 0.96 2016-17




Assestless


10 Ganthiya



P UG 1 2016-17


(Acre) P UG 0.9 2016-17


Sq.m.) P UG 1.92 2016-17




Assestless

Dal cum Floor mill P SHG 1.8 2016-17 Farm Implement (Rotavator) P UG 1 2016-17

Cotton picking machine P UG 0.48 2016-17 Vermicompost Unit P SHG 2.08 2016-17

TOTAL 16.14


11 Manka



Sq.m.) P UG 0.96 2016-17


(Acre) P UG 0.18 2016-17




Assestless


Production System –I

Vermicompost Unit: Wastes are nothing but misplaced resources. A large volume of organic matter is generated from agricultural activities, in dairy farms and animal wastes which are usually dumped in corners where it putrefies, usually emanating foul smell. This valuable resource can be utilised by properly composting it into a value-added end product called manure. The chief objective is to compost organic wastes not for the disposal of solid organic wastes but also to produce superior quality manure to feed our “nutrient/organic matter hungry” soils. Organic wastes can be broken down and fragmented rapidly by earthworms within short period of time. Vermicompost considerable enhances the soil fertility of and N,P,K are totally available to the plants. The water holding capacity of the soil is increased and also help in binding the soil particles together. It should be realized that vermicomposting can be a useful cottage industry for the underprivileged and the economically weak as it can provide them with a supplementary income. If every village can formulate a cooperative society or SHG’s of unemployed youth/women group, it could be a wise venture for them to produce vermicompost and sell it back to the village or firm at a recommended price. The youth will not only earn money, but also aid society by providing excellent quality organic manure for sustainable agro-practices. This is one of the simplest process where 5 mt.(length) * 1 mt (width) beds with 0.5 depth are made on the ground and in the backyard and is filled by 3 month old manure and worms are


introduced @ 1/2 kg/ sq.ft. These worms voraciously feed on the manure turning it to granulated compost with 45 day period of time. Hence yearly 8 cycles can be taken within 1 year of time. The proposed model is ideally suitably for the individual beneficiary. Components of Vermicompost Unit: About Worm Species: Non-Borrowing Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae is the scientific name of the worms commonly found in Indian soil. They are non- borrowing and surface feeders and go maximum up to a depth of 1- 1.5 mts. Feeds on decomposing organic matter and well decomposed manure. They are voracious feeders and survive in most of the stressed conditions. Shade Net/ Green Net: A net with 90% shade with steel pipes of 72 running ft for supporting the shade net is recommended and suitable for the construction of a ideal vermicompost unit. The main purpose of shade net is to minimize the sunlight to maximum possible extend and allow only that amount which is essential for keeping worm alive and maintaining a warmer vicinity. Tools and Implements: Some tools and implements are required a crowbar, spade, rose can for watering and sieve for sieving the vermicompost for separating the compost without injury to the earth worms when the compost is ready for packing and storing. Vermi-Composting Beds: Customized beds were prepared based upon areas requirement and availability of the manure and raw material. The dimension of bed for this specific area are as follows 5mt length *1mt width * 0.5 mt depth. Manure is introduced into the beds at the rate of 1200 kgs and 400 kgs organic farm waste. These types of beds are feasible and require less space and are good example of the small scale commercial unit for a individual beneficiary at village level Land and worms requirement: Area of 21 Sq. meter is need to cover two bed of above mentioned dimensions. The beds are made up of bricks at sides and bottom to maintain the proper structure and depth to ensure viable structure for long period of time. Worms are introduced @ 250 worms for meter 2. This the optimum population for this bed of this dimension to ensure proper multiplication of worms and composting in desired period of time.. Proposed Model of 2 bed Dimension (5mt *1.5mt*0.5mt):

S.N. Particulars Units Unit Cost (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)

1 Vermiculture (Eudrillus eugeniae L) 14 kg 280/kg 3920


2 Class 'A" ISI GI 25*25 mm Square Pipes (12 Guage) (Refer Attachment)

122 Feet 25/Feet 3050

3 90 % Standard Green Shed Net 78 Sq.m. 30/Sq.m. 2340 4 MS Pipes Jointer (14 Piece of 4") 1.5 Kg 50/Kg 75 5 Fabrication Labour 48 Kg 10/Kg 480 6 Bricks 325 No. 4/Piece 1300 7 Installation Charges (Digging Pits, Land Levelling, Placing of GI Pipes in

in digs, Upper shed fitting, Arrangement of Bricks, Net Fitting, Application of FYM/Organic Matter and Worms in beds)

4 Labour 125/Labour 500

8 Sieve 4mm 1.5*1.5 Feet 1 No. 300/Unit 300 9 Watering Can 1 No. 250/Unit 250

10 GI Wires, Nut-Bolts 1 Kg 80/Kg 80 11 Transportation - - 200 12 Cementing the bricks and labour charges - - 500

TOTAL 12995

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) Unit Total

1 Raw material 800

2 Transportation 500

3 Miscellaneous 200

Total Variable Cost 1500

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs. 1500

2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 1050

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 1.4

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) Includes the cost of vermicompost and verms

3.6

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 3780

6 Unit Margin (P-AVC) 2.2


7 Net profit per cycle (TR-TVC) 2280

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin = 12020/2.2=5463.6 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 1.52

Production System-II

Introduction: Rural economy is mainly based upon the agriculture, agriculture growth on the other hand is decelerated at macro level with un- profitable remuneration, crop failure with adverse climatic condition coupled with falling real prices of farm products, and contributing population from agriculture to non-agricultural sector. Added to these problems is the problem of depleting and degrading natural base for farming, threatening the very livelihood security of a majority of subsistence farmers. The farming industry is getting un-remunerative, the failures of identifying right growth priorities within farming sector, have culminated in farmer’s distress. At this juncture horticultural crops are new hope in providing economic security and further growth. The production and consumption of horticultural products could play a key role in providing nutrition and health security to the people and especially on the income of farmers. Further, given the high degree of agricultural development segmentation with a small percentage of commercial farmers and a great majority of subsistence farmers, horticultural development could provide an opportunity to bring the subsistence and bypass farmers into the development orbit; if the appropriate technologies are identified and implemented. Horticultural crops can augment employment-income generation to ensure livelihood security of the subsistence farmers without further depleting and degrading the natural resource base for achieving livelihood security and increased economic growth, Production Details of Fruit Crops: Table-1 S.no Name of Fruit Crop Plants

per acre Specing Production details every years (plants / kg)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1

Kesar Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. - - - 5 15 15 25 40 60 95 Rajapuri Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. - - - 15 20 25 35 60 80 120

Langdo Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. - - - 7 15 30 35 45 75 100

2 Sapota (Kalipati) 40 10 X 10 MT. - - - 20 35 45 75 100 120 140 3 Guava 110 6 x 6 MT. - - 10 25 45 80 110 125 135 150 4 Custard Apple (Balanagari) 80 5 X 5 MT. - - - 5 7 11 13 15 18 20 5 Ber (Gola / Umaran) 110 6 X 6 MT. - 2 8 35 55 75 100 125 150 175

6 Kagadi Lemon 110 6 X 6 MT. - - 10 20 35 45 60 85 120 150


Details of Expenditure for Mango plantation: Table-2

Sr No Particulars Expenditure in. Rs. 1 40 pits of 3 x 3 x 5 ft 1000 2 Grafted mango plants (40) / 70 Rs. Plants 5600 3 Transportation 2400 4 Thorry fencing 1600 5 Fertilizer / Insecticides in pits (40) 3000 6 Plantation & after care expenditure 4400 7 Irrigation to plants 7000

Total 25000 Production Parameters: Kesar variety of mango yields 15kg per plant of 5 years of times and keeps on increasing as growth proceeds.

Particulars Year Increase in

production in Qtl In Rs.

A Initial Investment Rs. 12,000

B Production /year(15kg/40 Plants) 6

C Gross income/ Year for 600kg @( Rs.3500/100kg) 6*3500 21000

D

Net Income/ Year* (C-A) 5th Year 9000

Net Income/ Year* 6th Year =(20*40) 8*3500 28000

Net Income/ Year* 7th Year=(25*40) 10*3850 38500




Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost

a Digging of pits (3*3*5 ft) 40 Rs. 25 Rs. 1000

b Grafted Mango Plants 40 Rs. 140 Rs. 5600

c Transportation cost 40 Rs. 60.00 Rs. 2400.00

d Throny Fencing Rs. 1600.00


e Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits Rs. 3000.00

f Plantation & after care expenditure 40 Rs. 110.00 Rs. 4400.00

g Irrigation to plants Rs. 7000.00

Total: Fixed Cost Rs. 25000.00

II Variable Cost (One production cycle)

a Labour 2000

b FertiliBaroli/ Insecticides in pits 2000

c Transportation cost 1000

d Packing 500

e Miscellaneous 2500


Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs. 8000

2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 1000

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 8000/1000 8

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 38.5

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 38.5*1000 38500

6 Unit Margin (P-AVC) 38.5-8 30.5

7 Net profit per cycle (TR-TVC) 38500-8000 30500

Break Even Point = Fixed cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin

= 12500/30.5=409.5

Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 30500/8000 = 3.8 ((should be greater than 1)


Production System III:

Net House Farming: Net Houses cultivation has been experiencing accelerated growth in recent years. Because of the substantial financial investment involved in the building and maintenance of Net Houses’, they are largely used for high added value crops. Net Houses development is particularly suited to the small family farm where there are constraints on available land and water. An average of 300 tons of tomatoes is grown per hectare per season, four times that harvested in open fields. In addition, plastic Net Houses structures have recently come into use for housing livestock, mainly chicken and fish.Net houses are mainly used for growing flowers, vegetables, ornamental plants and spices. Recently experiments have been conducted to investigate the feasibility of Net Houses-grown fruit trees such as nectarines, peaches, loquats, grapes and bananas for commercial purposes, mainly for export. In our project villages there is vast potential for growing horticulture and floriculture crops which have high commercial value and profit margins are equally with short term returns on investments. A model of capsicum farming in net house is designed in small area to reap the benefits to the best from improvised farming techniques. Detail of Costing in Net-house: S.no Cost Head Unit Unit

Quantity Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost i Civil Works Excavation for net-house coloumn (1:2:4) ordinary Cement

Concrere of curing etc. Size: 9''*9''*1'-6'' No. 17 225.00 3825.00

ii STRUCTURE WORK 0 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 32 mm Rmt. 102 225.00 22950.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 25 mm Rmt. 54 168.00 9072.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 20 mm Rmt. 30 118.00 3540.00 90 % Shade Agro net Sq. Mt. 300 32.00 9600.00 Ropes Rmt. 200 2.50 500.00

iii Fitting Charges L/S 1 6849.3 6849.30 Misting System for net house without Ele. motor Nos. - - 0 Plumbing Materials for connecting motor to irrigation system Nos. - - 0

iv Taxes @ 5% L/S 1 2816.82 2816.82

Total 59153.12

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) Units Unit cost Total


a Seedlings 400.No 5 2000

b Land preparation 108.Sqmt 200

c FeritliBaroli & Pesticide 2000

d Packing Material 500

e Transportation 2500


Revenue Model for Net house: Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 7200

2 Total Production (Q) kgs 1080

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 6.6

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 25 5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 27000 6 Unit Margin (P-AVC) 18.4 7 Net profit per cycle (TR-TVC) 19800

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =59153/18.4=3214.8 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 19800/7200= 2.75

Production System IV:

Fodder Plots: Fodder and its availability is one of the foremost reason for development of dairy any area. Just like human tend to move to different places in search of food, fodder for animals in an integral part for survival and perpetuation. Animal’s husbandry is no more backyard venture today; it can be a major source of income if managed. Projects villages of BAROLI have the potential for better fodder production and livestock improvement which can be risk free income for the farmers. Hence to sensitize the community regarding fodder production and factor effecting the production of milk, different farmers are selected based upon animal population and fodder will be provided to measure the benefits. The numerous benefits in any situation include:

increased soil fertility when legumes are used; increased soil quality; better water filtration and internal drainage;


less disease in subsequent cereal crops; reduced weed populations; increased yields in subsequent crops; better economics in subsequent crops; Greater and deeper carbon sequestering for greenhouse gas reduction.

Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Land preparation (Ha) 1 1800 1800 b Seed rate in kgs 2 bags 850 1700 c Fertilizer in kgs 0 d Organic 1 tractor load 1500 1500 e Urea in kgs (50kg bag) 3 525 1575

f DAP in kgs (50kg bag) 1 950 950

g Seed sowing cost/ha - 700 700 h Irrigation cost/ha - 600 850 i Medical Kit (For 6 Month) 1 1500 1500


S.No Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs 6980 2 Total Production (Q) kgs 35000 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 0.20 4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) Rs 3 5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) Rs 105000 6 Unit Margin (P-AVC) Rs 2.80 7 Net profit per cycle (TR-TVC) Rs 98020

Benefit Cost Ratio: 35020/6980= 5.0

Production System V:

Flour Mill:


One of the major backdrops of these project villages is lack of alternate livelihood options in project area. Hence after conducting PRA exercise and Focus group discussion with the villagers, several alternate livelihood option were identified, among them flour mill is very valid option for SHG groups created in the villages of the project area. Underlying assumption: A village with minimum 100 household requirements per day flour would be 200kgs @ 2 kgs / household; hence on an average at

least 6000 kgs of flour is needed for 30days.

S. No Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost 1 Flour mill 1 40000 40000 2 Motor cost(10 HP) 1 20000 20000 3 Rice mill holder(extra) 1 40000 40000 4 Other infrastructure 60000 60000 5 Flooring and Light fitting 14000 14000 Total: Fixed Cost 174000

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) 1 Labour 0 0 2500 2 Raw material - - - 3 Rent 0 0 500 4 Electricity bill (1 month) 20 units 3.75 2250 5 Interest - - - 6 Miscellaneous 1 1000 1000


S. No Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs 3750

2 Total Production (Q) Rs 6000 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) Rs 0.62

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) Rs 3.0 5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) Rs 18000 6 Unit Margin (P-AVC) 2.38


7 Net profit per cycle (TR-TVC) Rs 14250 Break Even Point= 75000/2=35000 Benefit cost ratio= 14250/3750 = 3.8

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. N. Names of Major activities of the SHGs

Villages Name of activity No. of

SHGs

involved

Average annual income

from activity per SHG

(Rs. in Lakh)

1 Simal Faliya Vermicompost Unit 1 3.31

2 Bhensa Vermicompost Unit 1 1.61

3 Manka Vermicompost Unit 1 3.31

4 Luni Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill 2 3.31

5 Badvav Vermicompost Unit 1 1.61

6 Oliamba Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill 2 1.61

7 Gathiya Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill 2 1.61

8 Singla Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill, Mahuda Oil Extraction Unit, Agri mall 4 1.61

9 Pandarvant Vermicompost Unit, Flour cum Rice Mill 2 1.61

10 Juna Udepur Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill 2 1.61

12 Gabadiya Vermicompost Unit , Dal-cum-Floor Mill 2 1.61

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

S. N. Village Name of activity Forward/ Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome

1 Simal Faliya Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

2 Bhensa Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

3 Manka Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

4 Luni Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

5 Badvav Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

6 Oliamba Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

7 Gathiya Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

8 Singla Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -


9 Pandarvant Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

10 Juna Udepur Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

11 Gabadiya Vermicompost Unit Forward/Backward Linkage Forest Dept., "Sarjan" NGO -

Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/

work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

Drainage line

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(D) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

Others

(pl. specify)

1 Simal falia Horticulture L P UG 1 0.25

2 Bhensa Horticulture L P UG 6 1.5

Fodder L P UG 6 0.72

3 Juna

Udepur

Horticulture L P UG 2 0.5


4 Manka (Chho.)

Horticulture L P UG 1 0.25


5 Gabadiya Horticulture L P UG 4 0.75


6 Oliamba Horticulture L P UG 4 1


7 Pandarvan

t

Horticulture L P UG 3 .75


8 Singala Horticulture L P UG 5 1.25


9 Luni Horticulture L P UG 3 0.75


10 Badvav Horticulture L P UG 2 0.5


11 Ganthiya Horticulture L P UG 6 1.5


Fodder L P UG 5 0.6

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the

villages CPR particulars Activity

proposed

Target

Target area under the

activity (ha) Estimated

expenditure (Rs.) Expected no. of

beneficiaries

Total for village

No Total for project

4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going

beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to

take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important

factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at Project area

Alternative Land Use Plan

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Fodder development and Management

Afforestation

Organic Farming


Meteorological Information

Dairy Development and Management

S. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website & e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of specialization$

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees

to be trained

1 Krishi Vigyan

Kendra,

Krushi Vigyan Kendra, Training in modern and

scientific agriculture practices

Agri. Extension & Training

- 2009-10 5 11 At : & Po : Golagamdi, Tal : Sankheda, Dist. : Baroda

2 Sadguru

Foundation, Dahod

N M sadguru Water and development foundation P.B No

171,dahod ,389151

NGO Social

development - 2009-10 11 335 02673-238601,238602

Fax-02673-238604

Website-www.mmsadguru.org

e-Mail- [email protected]

3 CSWCRTI

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. District Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

1 Vadodara

PIA

5 5 9

WDTs 27.98 lacs *(5% of total capacity building fund) UGs

SHGs 4 4 10

mailto:[email protected]


WCs - - -

GPs 162 - 9

Community 40 10 6

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No.

Particulars Number/Year Cost per unit Executing agency Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Outcomes

1 Street play 20 4500

PIA and DWDU, Vadodara

90000

Awareness for the importance

of watershed project

2 Campaigning for community mobilisation

4 2500 PIA and DWDU,

Vadodara 10000

3 Pamphlets and posters 20000 3


60000

4 Banners, Hoardings 20 600


12000

5 Wall Painting at 3 community places 20 2500


50000


CHAPTER – 5

BUDGETING


Budgeting The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done

accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds.

BUDGET Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement 1 Administrative costs 55.98 2 Monitoring 5.60 3 Evaluation 5.60 4 Entry Point activity 22.39

5 Institution and Capacity Building 27.99 6 Detailed Project Report 5.60

7 Watershed Development Works 313.48

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 50.38

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 55.98 10 Consolidation phase 16.79

TOTAL 559.79

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

S.N. Village Activity

EPA Institution and CB

DPR

Watershed

development Work

Livelihood for asset

less

Production system and

Microenterprises

Consolidatio

n

Administrative costs

Monitoring

Evaluation

Total

1 Simal Faliya 0.48 0.60 0.12 6.71 1.08 1.20 0.36 1.20 0.12 0.12 11.99

2 Juna Udepur 1.73 2.16 0.43 24.20 3.89 4.32 1.30 4.32 0.43 0.43 43.21

3 Manka (Chho.) 0.58 0.73 0.15 8.17 1.31 1.46 0.44 1.46 0.15 0.15 14.59


4 Gabadiya 1.73 2.17 0.43 24.26 3.90 4.33 1.30 4.33 0.43 0.43 43.31

5 Singala 4.35 5.43 1.09 60.84 9.78 10.86 3.26 10.86 1.09 1.09 108.64

6 Luni 2.32 2.90 0.58 32.47 5.22 5.80 1.74 5.80 0.58 0.58 57.99

7 Badvav 1.10 1.37 0.27 15.37 2.47 2.74 0.82 2.74 0.27 0.27 27.44

8 Ganthiya 2.70 3.37 0.67 37.77 6.07 6.74 2.02 6.74 0.67 0.67 67.44

9 OliAmba 2.45 3.06 0.61 34.29 5.51 6.12 1.84 6.12 0.61 0.61 61.24

10 Padharvant 1.61 2.02 0.40 22.60 3.63 4.04 1.21 4.04 0.40 0.40 40.36

11 Bhensha 3.34 4.17 0.83 46.74 7.51 8.35 2.50 8.35 0.83 0.83 83.46

Total 22.39 27.98 5.60 313.41 50.37 55.97 16.79 55.97 5.60 5.60 559.67

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available

under IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Simal Faliya 18.13 11.99 6.14

2 Bhensa 88.71 83.46 5.25

3 Oliamba 64.54 61.24 3.30

4 Juna Udepur 50.86 43.21 7.65

5 Manka (Chho.) 20.07 14.59 5.48

6 Gabadiya 49.26 43.26 6

7 Pandarvant 43.36 40.36 3

8 Singala 117.94 108.64 9.3

9 Luni 64.23 57.99 6.24

10 Badvav 33.84 27.44 6.4

11 Ganthiya 74.11 67.44 6.67


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Phase/ Type of

work* Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/

task/ structure in

DPR

Level at which decision for convergence

was taken

1 Simal Fliya Surface Water check wall-6 4.04 MGNRGA Project Level

Livelihood Cattle Camp 0.6 JK Trust, TASP District Level

Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 2Plot 1.5 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 6.14

2 Bhensa Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 1 Plot 5.25 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 5.25

3 Juna Udepur Surface Water check wall-7 4.8 MGNRGA Project Level


Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 3 Plot 2.25 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 7.65

4 Manka (Chho.) Surface Water check wall-6 4.13 MGNRGA Project Level



TOTAL 5.48

5 Gabadiya Surface Water check wall-4 2.4 MGNRGA Project Level


Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 4Plot 3 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 6

6 Pandarvant Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 6 Plot 3 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 3

7 Oliamba Livelihood Cattle Camp 0.3 JK Trust, TASP District Level

Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 5 Plot 3 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 3.3

8 Singala Surface Water check wall-5 4.05 MGNRGA Project Level


TOTAL 9.30

9 Luni Surface Water check wall-5 2.94 MGNRGA Project Level




TOTAL 6.24

10 Badvav Surface Water check wall-5 3.55 MGNRGA Project Level


Livelihood Drip Irrigation- 3 Plot 2.25 GGRC, TASP District Level

TOTAL 6.4

11 Ganthiya Surface Water check wall-4 3.37 MGNRGA Project Level



TOTAL 6.67


CHAPTER – 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES


Expected Outcomes

Employment

One of the prominent features of watershed program is to create self sustainace to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in

employment opportunities is one of the benchmark that can unravel the effect of watershed. Watershed creates employment

opportunities during the work phase for labour intensive activities like construction of gully plug, earthen dam, Farm bund, check

dam, check wall and through the assets created under watershed program have a direct impact on agriculture and natural resource

development. Livelihood for self employed, wage labor and income generating activities where there is a ample scope for

employment. As the net employment increases the per capita income of agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activities are

also sure to increase.

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits Sr. No.

Village Ground water table (mt) Tree cover

Open well: pre-project

Open well: post-

project

Bore well: pre-project

Bore well: post-

project

Area in Ha.: pre-

project

Area in Ha.: post-

project

Tree count: pre-project

Tree count: post-project

1 Simal Faliya 12 8 38 32 43.60 78.60 2240 2304 2 Bhensa 13 9 39 33 150.15 218.15 6816 6880 3 Manka 11 8 39 33 50.60 76.60 1347.2 1411.2 4 Luni 13 9 38 32 113.70 148.70 0 64 5 Badvav 13 9 40 33 119.70 154.70 3393.6 3457.6 6 Oliamba 12 8 41 34 457.60 602.60 1201.6 1265.6 7 Gathiya 12 8 35 30 366.50 434.50 1740.8 1804.8 8 Singla 12 8 38 32 1022.50 1078.50 1373.6 1437.6 9 Pandarvant 14 9 39 33 57.89 92.89 486.4 550.4

10 Juna Udepur 14 9 38 33 193.20 249.20 0 64 11 Gabadiya 13 9 39 34 586.90 621.90 Average 12.5 8.5 38.6667 32.8333


Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water S.

No. Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water

(no. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Simal Faliya

10 12 Potable

2 Bhensa 3 Manka 4 Luni 5 Badvav 6 Oliamba 7 Gathiya 8 Singla 9 Pandarvant

10 Juna Udepur 11 Gabadiya

Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area

Name of village

Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per

ha.( kg) Area (ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl)

Ganthiya

Kharif -

Maize 64.9 14.58 71.39 17.50

Tur 39.09 5.52 43.00 6.62

Paddy(UI) 55.3 9.52 60.83 11.42

BlackGram 33.7 6.52 37.07 7.82

Rabi

Maize 3.6 17.95 3.96 21.54

BlackGram 3.2 7.5 3.52 9.00

Groundnut


Zaid

Village total 199.79 61.59 219.77 73.91

Singla

Kharif

Maize 41.4 14.4 45.54 17.28

Tur 5.2 6.1 5.72 7.32

Paddy(UI) 39.5 9.25 43.45 11.1

Groundnut

BlackGram 23.6 6.5 25.96 7.8

Rabi

Zaid

Village total 109.7 36.25 120.67 43.5

Simal falia

Kharif

Maize 73.9 12.82 81.29 15.38

Tur 6.5 4.66 7.15 5.59

Paddy(UI) 84.9 8.7 93.39 10.44

BlackGram 28.7 6.42 31.57 32.85

Rabi

Maize 1.2 17.7 1.32 21.24

Groundnut 0.4 12 0.44 14.40

Zaid

Village total 195.2 50.3 215.16 99.91

Luni

Kharif

Maize 35.9 13.45 39.49 16.14

Tur 7.30 5.30 8.03 6.36

Paddy(UI) 50.3 9.85 55.33 11.82

Groundnut

BlackGram 24.3 6.85 26.73 8.22

Rabi

Maize 19.6 17.1 21.56 20.52

BlackGram 0.4 7 0.44 8.4

Zaid

Village total 137.8 59.55 151.58 71.46

Bhensa Kharif


Maize 24.6 12.95 27.06 15.54

Tur 3.2 4.23 3.52 5.08

Paddy(UI) 15.9 8.1 17.49 9.72

Rabi

BlackGram 0.4 7 0.44 8.40

Groundnut 0.1 12.5 0.11 15.00

Zaid

Village total 44.2 44.78 48.62 53.736

Badvav

Kharif

Maize 49.8 12.55 54.78 15.06

Tur 15.3 4.38 16.83 5.26

Paddy(UI) 38.8 8.4 42.68 10.08

BlackGram 49.8 5.87 54.78 7.04

Rabi

Maize 0.4 16.22 0.44 19.46

BlackGram 2 7.2 2.2 8.64

Zaid

Village total 156.1 54.62 171.71 65.544

Manka

Kharif

Maize 77.1 12.72 84.81 15.26

Tur 10.7 4.55 11.77 5.46

Paddy(UI) 52.9 7.72 58.19 9.26

BlackGram 24.3 5.7 26.73 6.84

Cotton(UI) 0.8 10.8 0.88 12.96

Rabi

Maize 0.4 16.6 0.44 19.92

Groundnut 7.6 10.32 8.36 12.38

Zaid

Village total 173.8 68.41 191.18 82.09

Oliamba

Kharif

Maize 33.1 13.9 36.41 16.68

Tur 0.4 5.8 0.44 6.96

Paddy(UI) 36.5 9.08 40.15 10.90


BlackGram 21.1 6.75 23.21 8.10

Cotton(UI)

Village total 91.1 35.53 100.21 42.64

Pandarvant

Kharif

Maize 35.9 13.45 39.49 16.14

Tur 7.30 5.30 8.03 6.36

Paddy(UI) 50.3 9.85 55.33 11.82

Groundnut

BlackGram 24.3 6.85 26.73 8.22

Rabi

Maize 19.6 17.1 21.56 20.52

BlackGram 0.4 7 0.44 8.4

Zaid

Village total 137.8 59.55 151.58 71.46

Juna Udepur

Kharif

Maize 24.6 12.95 27.06 15.54

Tur 3.2 4.23 3.52 5.08

Paddy(UI) 15.9 8.1 17.49 9.72

Rabi

BlackGram 0.4 7 0.44 8.40

Groundnut 0.1 12.5 0.11 15.00

Zaid

Village total 44.2 44.78 48.62 53.736

Gabadiya

Kharif

Maize 73.9 12.82 81.29 15.38

Tur 6.5 4.66 7.15 5.59

Paddy(UI) 84.9 8.7 93.39 10.44

BlackGram 28.7 6.42 31.57 32.85

Rabi

Maize 1.2 17.7 1.32 21.24

Groundnut 0.4 12 0.44 14.40


Table no. 55: Area(Ha.) under horticulture / other crops

S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project

1 Simal Faliya

Mango, sapota, guava, Pomgranate, Drum stick, ber

37.4 48.85

2 Bhensa 14.64 19.12 3 Manka 1.4 1.83

4 Luni 13.64 17.82 5 Badvav 4.88 6.37 6 Oliamba 10.88 14.21

7 Gathiya 25.08 32.76

8 Singla 19.08 24.92

9 Pandarvant 14.08 18.39 10 Juna Udepur 12.8 17.85

11 Gabadiya 4.88 7.84

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas

Name of Village

Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

Simal Faliya

Milch-animals 254 7326 219780 323 9316.13 279484

Draught Purpose animals 52 76

Animals for other purpose 483 765

Bhensa Milch-animals 173 2523 75690 210 3062.6 91878



Manka Milch-animals 117 0 180 0 0



Luni Milch-animals 339 15690 470700 510 23604.4 708133



Badvav Milch-animals 133 200 6000 190 285.714 8571.43 Draught Purpose animals 119 155 Animals for other purpose 189 275

Oliamba Milch-animals 84 930 27900 135 1494.64 44839.3




Gathiya Milch-animals 201 1275 38250 290 1839.55 55186.6



Singla Milch-animals 219 369 11070 310 522.329 15669.9 Draught Purpose animals 294 415 Animals for other purpose 510 650

Pandarvant Milch-animals 405 5117 153510 650 8212.47 246374



Juna Udepur Milch-animals 17 220 6600 250 3235.29 97058.8

Draught Purpose animals 9 45 Animals for other purpose 31 105

Gabadiya Milch-animals 166 344 10320 215 445.542 13366.3



Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area:

S. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Simal Faliya 675 12430 80 4430 13185 14 902 0 418 916 5 15 0 100 20

2 Bhensa 0 15025 0 5270 15025 0 680 0 293 680 0 36 0 93 36

3 Manka 9720 31812 0 14595 41532 220 825 0 405 1045 25 42 0 122 67

4 Luni 0 29046 0 14310 29046 0 25 0 12 25 0 53 0 10 53

5 Badvav 0 12318 0 4925 12318 0 380 0 148 380 0 35 0 45 35

6 Oliamba 0 23858 0 10390 23858 0 835 0 291 835 0 25 0 25 25

7 Gathiya 0 72240 730 24365 72970 0 580 0 232 580 0 30 3 65 33

8 Singla 0 42388 0 17420 42388 0 165 0 64 165 0 19 0 10 19

9 Pandarvant 0 98825 880 35800 99705 0 925 16 538 941 0 60 9 175 69

10 Juna Udepur 0 56200 520 19260 56720 0 786 12 303 798 0 65 8 45 73


11 Gabadiya 0 65122 610 22380 65732 0 615 14 300 629 0 60 8 45 68

Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Simal Faliya 2 0 75-90 days 0

2 Bhensa 2 0 75-90 days 0

3 Manka 0 0 75-90 days 0

4 Luni 38 0 75-90 days 0

5 Badvav 10 0 75-90 days 0

6 Oliamba 8 0 75-90 days 0

7 Gathiya 57 0 75-90 days 0

8 Singla 146 0 75-90 days 0

9 Pandarvant 2 0 75-90 days 0

10 Juna Udepur 14 0 75-90 days 0

11 Gabadiya 0 0 75-90 days 0

Table no.59: Per capita Income

Sr. No. Village Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project

1 Simal Faliya

Agriculture 9543 10974

Animal Husbandry 5427 6078

Total 14970 17053

2 Bhensa


Forestry 1043 1157.73

Animal Husbandry 5339 5979.68

Casual Labour 1090 1144.5

Total 13540 15260

3 Manka


Forestry 1400 1554



Total 14675 16633

4 Luni


Forestry 950 1054.5



Total 14800 16720

5 Badvav


Forestry 830 921.3

Animal Husbandry 4500 5040


Total 13850 15664

6 Oliamba


Forestry 1590 1764.9



Total 15350 17282

7 Gathiya


Forestry 1340 1487.4



Total 14700 16566

8 Singla


Forestry 2045 2269.95



Total 13230 14916

9 Pandarvant



Casual Labour 1140 1197

Total 15100 16971

10 Juna Udepur Agriculture 6564 7549


Forestry 1567 1739.37



Total 15230 17130

11 Gabadiya


Forestry 1876 2082.36


Total 15355 17392


Action plan map-Badvav


Action plan map-Oliamba


Action plan map-Gabadiya


Action plan map-Ganthiya


Action plan map-Pandarvant


Action plan map-Juna udepur


Action plan map-Luni


Action plan map-Manka


Action plan map-Bhensa


Action plan map-Simalfalia


Action plan map-Singla

district vadodara [juna udepur cu] commissionerate of...

Documents