dmadv checklist template
DESCRIPTION
dmadvTRANSCRIPT
1
Primary/Secondary/Research
31. Process owner assigned on-going PMCS accountabilityOther
30. Process Management Control System functioning (with stable X & Yindicators)
Capability Analysis
29.Process satisfies performance requirements for initial Y indicatRun charts Control charts
28. Full-scale start-up plan and training completedAction plan PMCS
27. Final detailed design completed and PMCS developedDetailed implementation plan
26.Pilot run results evaluated (including cost/benefit), X & Y indi validated
FMEA Errorproofing
GraphsVALIDATE5
25. Pilot/verification test plan developedOther
24. Multi-generational design plan developedCost/Benefit/Analysis
23. Detail design review conducted and modifications madePMCS Design Review
22. Enabling design elements identified and developedMGP Value Analysis
21. Detail design evaluated for value, productivity, capability and cost/benefitsFMEA Errorproofing
20.Process indicators (Xs) identified and linked to outcome indicat ors ( Ys ) Productivity/Analysis
19. Alterative detail designs developed and evaluatedFlowcharts SimulationDESIGN4
18. High- level design review conducted and modifications madeOther
17. Potential pitfalls in the design evaluated and eliminated or min imized Design Review
16. High-level design demonstrates capability to meet customer CTQsQFD Structure Trees
15. High-level process design alternatives developed and evaluatedFMEA Error-Proof
14. Selected design track consistently followed to produce high-level designMatrices Flowcharts
Benchmarking Interview Guide
ANALYZE3
13. Development risks assessed and exit strategies developedOther
12. Design methodology selectedRisk Assessment
11. Overall product/service requirements determined and prioritizedBrainstorming
10. *0utcome indicator for current process measured againstCTQsCTQ Matrix
9. Customer specifications forCTQs identifiedKano Analysis
8. Associated process outcome indicators (Ys) to measure CTQs Customer/Market Research
7. Customer needs defined & prioritized (CTQs)Competitive Analysis
MEASURE2
6. Project plan completed
5. Preliminary opportunity/gap statement developed and reviewed withsponsor
Other
4. Product/service objective and target customers determined*Process Flowchart
3. Scope of project determined (i.e. process boundaries)Customer Surveys
2. Outcome indicator(s) reflecting preliminary opportunity/gapLinkage
1. Link established to related TLIs and core process outcome indicators ( Ys )Project Planning SheetDEFINE1
TEAM EFFORT
CommentsObjective and CheckpointsTools/Techniques(* =applies only to redesign)
Story Step Name#
Presentation Date:Team Name:D-M-A -D-
Primary/Secondary/Research
31. Process owner assigned on-going PMCS accountabilityOther
30. Process Management Control System functioning (with stable X & Yindicators)
Capability Analysis
29. Process satisfies performance requirements for initial Y indicator(s)Run charts Control charts
28. Full-scale start-up plan and training completedAction plan PMCS
27. Final detailed design completed and PMCS developedDetailed implementation plan
26. Pilot run results evaluated (including cost/benefit), X & Y indicators validated
FMEA Errorproofing
GraphsVALIDATE5
25. Pilot/verification test plan developedOther
24. Multi-generational design plan developedCost/Benefit/Analysis
23. Detail design review conducted and modifications madePMCS Design Review
22. Enabling design elements identified and developedMGP Value Analysis
21. Detail design evaluated for value, productivity, capability and cost/benefitsFMEA Errorproofing
20. Process indicators (Xs) identified and linked to outcome indicat Productivity/Analysis
19. Alterative detail designs developed and evaluatedFlowcharts SimulationDESIGN4
18. High-level design review conducted and modifications madeOther
17. Potential pitfalls in the design evaluated and eliminated or minDesign Review
16. High-level design demonstrates capability to meet customer QFD Structure Trees
15. High-level process design alternatives developed and evaluatedFMEA
14. Selected design track consistently followed to produce high-level designMatrices Flowcharts
Benchmarking Interview Guide
3
13. Development risks assessed and exit strategies developedOther
12. Design methodology selectedRisk Assessment
11. Overall product/service requirements determined and prioritizedBrainstorming
10. *0utcome indicator for current process measured againstCTQsCTQ Matrix
9. Customer specifications forCTQs identifiedKano Analysis
8. Associated process outcome indicators (Ys) to measure CTQs Customer/Market Research
7. Customer needs defined & prioritized (CTQs)Competitive Analysis
To identify customer needs, specify CTQs, product/service requirements
MEASURE2
6. Project plan completed
5. Preliminary opportunity/gap statement developed and reviewedsponsor
Other
4. Product/service objective and target customers determined*Process Flowchart
3. Scope of project determined (i.e. process boundaries)Customer Surveys
2. Outcome indicator(s) reflecting preliminary opportunity/gapLinkage
1. Link established to related TLIs and core process outcome indicators (Project Planning Sheet
To identify business objectives, project scope, product/service concept and develop project plan
DEFINE1
3. The team members regularly attended all meetings.2. Team scheduled and held frequent meetings.1. The Back Belt and members were trained in the process.To plan and implement the process design/redesign
TEAM EFFORT
CommentsObjective and CheckpointsTools/Techniques(* =applies only to redesign)
Story Step Name#
Design Area:Presentation Date:Team Name:
D-M - -D-V STORY REVIEW FORM
To convert customer product/service requirements into process design requirements and establish a high-level design
To develop, evaluate and select a detailed process/product design
To assure new design meets customer requirements, institutionalize it, and implement on-going monitoring