DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 202 385 HE 013 901

AUTHOR Clemow, BiceTITLE Second Annual Inservice Education Program (IEP)

Invitational Seminar for Members of StatewideCoordinating and Governing Boards: Notes. (Afton,Oklahoma, August 1980) .

INSTITUTION Education Commission of the States, Denver, Colo.Inservice Education Program.; State Higher EducationExecutive Officers Association.

SPONS AGENCY Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Mich.REPORT NO IEP-908PUB DATE Aug 80NOTE 21p.

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Accountability; College Planning; *Financial

Problems; Governance; *Government SchoolRelationship; *Higher Education; Inservice Education;Long Range Planning; Retrenchment; State Agencies;*State Boards of Education; *Statewide Planning

IDENTIFIERS *Seminars for State Leaders Postsec Ed (ECS SHEEO)

ABSTRACTNotes on a 1980 seminar for members of statewide

coordinating and governing boards are presented as part of aninservice education program. Speakers and participants spoke on suchtopics as the relations among universities and governments in a timeof increasing accountability, institutional reactions underconditions of fiscal stress, and possibilities of enhancement ofrelationships among statewide boards and their constituents. Thekeynote speech by Lord Asa Briggs indicated the international scopeof the dilemmas facing those governing and administering highereducation during a time of pressure for public accountability createdby lowering enrollments and funding restraints. Lyman A. Glennydescribed his study of response to fiscal stress by 10 Californiainstitutions. He documented uneven enrollment trends and suggestedthat public institutions that are expanding are not having theirgrowth adequately funded. Richard Ingram addressed the role oftrustees and regents in the institutional response to stress anddescribed a five-year planning document at Plattsburg StateUniversity of New York. Robert Lewis considered the relationshipbetween trustees and college executives, and Robert Berdahl arguedthat 'Ideparochialization" of academic disciplines must be one keygoal for any statewide board. E. T. Dunlap traced the progress of theIEP with W. K. Kellogg and Frost Foundations funding and solicitedaffirmation of the continuation of similar programs. A seminarschedule, a list of participants, and memorable quotations from theseminar are included. (SW)

***********************************************************************Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made *

from the original document.***********************************************************************

,y) Second Annual Inservice Education,,I Program (IEP) Invitational Seminarfor Members of Statewide.

Li-f Coordinating and Governing Boards"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).-

Shangri-la August 11-12, 1980 Afton, Oklahoma

NOTES

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER iffilel

Th6 docunitR has Iwo!, ft.poduced anacer.aa tame tht pest or ora,inlidfaai

Mrcnlr

talaimilaa,

,f,a,aa5 hlvt. berl mailt, to moo,relaotl.ctiati qualay,

Punat, of vtatv caamans th,,,jecNIE

posmori tir pultCy

Major TopicsRelations Between Universities and Governments in Time of IncreasingAccountability

Institutional Reactions Under Conditions of Fiscal Stress

How Might Statewide Boards Continue to Enhance Relationships With Their .

Constituents?

Program ContributorsALLEN R. BARES ROBERT BERDAHL Lord ASA BRIGGSState Senator State University of New Oxford UniversityLthiniana York at Buffalo

JANE BURKE GERALDINE CARTER LAURA CHODOSAlabama Commission on Minnesota Higher Education Roald nt Regents

Hishet Education Coordinating Board University of the Stateof New Yodc

ALLISON S. COWLES E. T. DUNLAPWashington State Council for Oklahoma State Regents JAMES M. FURMAN

Postsecondary Education for Higher Education Illinms Board ofHigher Education

LYMAN A. GLENNY RICHARD T. INGRAMUniversity of Califcmia Association of GOVPinitiq ELIZABETH JOHNSONBerkeley Itoolds of Univnaties °tenon Educational

Coheres Cuordinating CommissionROBERT L. LEWIS Washington. D.C.Association of Got/minty) LOUIS RABINEAU

Boards of Universities SCOrT E.. ORRISON Inservice Educationand Colleges igtallettla State nmr9,1% for Pi main

Washington, D.C. Muller Education Denver. Colorado

.0%

PAM RYMER (tOFMON WILLIS WENDELL W. WOODCalifornia Postsecondary Vimittia State Conoco of Nelnaska Coordinating

Ethic:Ilion Commission Hittite! Education Commission for PostsecondaryEnticatnin

ossmsage1692ruilonCommessoon the Sara.

INSERVICE EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP)

The Inservice Education Program (IEP), a project of thePostsecondary Education Department of the EducationCommission of the States (ECS), provides a specialservice. The program brings together educators, govern-ment officials and other interested individuals toaddress common problems facing postsecondary educationin the states. Services include seminars, conferencesand meetings where statewide decision makers join withthe most knowledgeable researchers and practitionersin the field for in-depth examinations of priorityissues in postsecondary education.

IEP is sponsored by ECS and the State Higher EducationExecutive Officers (SHEEO). It is supported primarilyby grants from the W.K. Kellogg and Frost Foundationswith additional funds from ECS, SHEEO and meeting regis-trations fees.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Foreword ii

An Evaluative Memorandum

Variable Conditions for Higher Education 1

Persistent Themes 1

Lord Asa Briggs: International Scope of Educational Dilemmas. . 3

Period of Uncertainty 3

Need for Psychologically Souria Understanding 3

Revised Premises for Unexpected Program Preferences, 3

Lyman A. Glenny: Response to Fiscal Stress 4

Uneven Enrollment Trends 4

Deterioration of Programs 4

Balancing Available Resources with Societal and Student Demand 5

Richard Ingram: Role of Trustees and Regents 5

Robert Lewis: Shared Objectives. 5

Robert Berdahl: Goal of Deparochialization 6

E.T. Dunlap: Progress of IEP 6

Memorable Quotations from the Seminar 7

Seminar Program 8

List of Attendees 10

FOREWORD

The Second Annual Inservice Education Program Invitational Seminar for members ofstatewide coordinating and governing boards in conjunction with the annual StateHigher Education Executive Officers CSHEEO) meeting provided two days of provoca-tive, stimulating sesstons at Shangri-la in Afton, Oklahoma, August 11-12, 1980.The following evaluative memorandum by Bice Clemow highlights the reactions andcomments of a rich mix of members of boards, including Robert Lewis, Chairman ofthe Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges; scholars ofhigher education; a state legislator; and leading SHEEO members. Speakers andparticipants spoke on such'topics as the relations among universities and govern-ments in a time of increasing accountability, institutional reactions under condi-tions of fiscal stress and possibilities of enhancement of relationships amongstatewide boards and their constituents.

Keynoter Lord Asa Briggs, Provost, Worcester College, Oxford University, England,perceptively and eloquently indicated the international scope of the dilemmasfacing those governing and administering higher education during a time ofpressure for public accountability created by lowering. enrollments and fundingrestraints. The national views of the present conditions in postsecondary educa-tion were equally interesting and informative, covering areas such as institutionalresponse to fiscal stress, the role of trustees and regents in response to suchstress, shared objectives of institutional trustees and statewide boards, andthe faculty perspective.

The town meeting format of an open forum at the close of the seminar was especiallylively because of the general participation of the attendees, producing several'memorable quotations" included with those of the speakers that are presented inthis report. As two of the ladies said: "The job of statewide boards is to thinkthe unthinkable" and statewide meetings of all concerned with higher education,like the Oklahoma seminar, are needed because "what a 'fella' is generally down onis what he ain't up on."

The Oklahonia seminar was built on the strength and valuable contributions of threeorganizations: the Education Commission of the States, the State Higher Education.Executive Officers and the. Association of Governing Boards of Universities andColleges. The attendees, and Cie readers of these notes, are the beneficiariesof their combined effort.

ii

0

Louis RabineauDirectorInservice Education Program

AN EVALUATIVE MEMORANDUM

BY BICE CLEMOW

ON THE INSERVICE EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP) INVITATIONAL SEMINAR FOR

MEMBERS OF STATEWIDE COORDINATING AND GOVERNING BOARDS

Afton, Oklahoma, August 11-12, 1980

The coming enrollment drought across many campuses of the United States and muchof the western world will parch some programs, peel off some professors and imperilmany marginal colleges. To explore ways in.wtich the damage to institutions undertheir care might be mitigated, a hundred professional and lay leaders in highereducation came to Afton, Oklahoma, from across the land to parley with specialistsof their own species.

During two days of "Inservice Education" under the aegis of the State HigherEducation Executive Officers (SHEEO) and the Education Commission:of the States(ECS), members of statewide boards for higher education and their executive staffsheard about many interactive variable conditions. They also heard French PoetPaul Valgry quoted as saying, "The trouble with our times is that the future isnot what it used to be." The name of the future, as they were frequently remindedduring the two days at the 100-square-mile man-made lakeside resort at Afton calledShangri-la, is pervasive uncertainty. Moreover, that uncertainty will exist inwhat speaker Robert L. Lewis described as the common environment for collegetrustees and administrators: "the jungle of higher education."

Variable Conditions for Higher Education

The variable conditions facing statewide board members and staffs are global,swinging on war and peace. They are national, regional, state and local. Theyare economic, demographic, cultural and political. They are traditional andtransient, societal and personal. Upon the accommodation to these multiplevariable factors rests the future of every college and university. Governance inhigher education, it was clear from two days of shared experience and expertanalysis, is not an exact science but a fragile, sophisticated and temperamentalhumanistic enterprise.

Persistent Themes

If the IEP "students" came looking for pat management formulas, they had to settlefor the doctrine of common sense. Given the variety of determinant variations,higher education governance experience reported by IEP speakers could be intriguingand suggestive without being necessarily replicable. There were, however,persistent themes from the diaries of higher education authorities and statewidegovernance and coordinating board and SHEEO members:

Higher education is about long-range considerations "for producing peoplenow who will really be able to contribute most effectively to society afterquite a long interval" (Lord Asa Briggs). However, long-range planning isincreasingly vulnerable to accelerating change.

There is an appalling lack of respected national and state leadership inbehalf of education, especially in the political sector. Foreshorteningof horizons is in order.

Accommodation to the decline in student age population, to the shiftingmix of employment needs and to inflationary pressures requires much moreaccurate statewide and local hard data widely shared and comprehended bygovernance and administrative personnel in higher education.

rnvolvement of all concerned with policy and program changes and implemen-tation--including especially faculty, students.and the paying public--willmaximize the effectiveness of change. In a caring society like ours . . .

the closer we are physically and emotionally to the people affected by ourpolicy decisions, the more likely we are to protect them as long as wecan" (Richard T. Ingram).

Uncertainity is not a valid excuse for delaying programmatic changes.

Program and personnel changes must. be reassessed continuously.

Accountability is not fulfilled by good accounting but most institutionsshould become more conscious of management.

Uniformity and mediocrity can easily be mandated, but educational qualityresults from contagious high morale.

The nation's higher educational plant is deterimrating. The transmissionof newly developed knowledge calls for new tectinology. Maintenance hasbeen deferred dangerously to protect faculty positions.

Establishment of priorities must precede budget trimming, for across-the-board percentage paring is unresponsive to changing student needs.

Enrollment-driven funding must give way to program funding.

Lifelong learners will not substantially take up the slack in the drop inenrollments of the 18- to 25-year-old students.

Institutional survival cannot be assumed.

Autonomy and cooperation are not mutally exclusive, but at a time when theeducational virtues and economies of coordinationiamong public institutions(and among public and independent ones) are imperfectly perceived, fiercecompetition for survival of colleges and integrity of programs inhibitscollectivism.

Lord Asa Briggs: International Scope of Educational Dilemmas

Lord Asa Briggs of England outlined the international scope of the dilemmas forthose governing and administering higher education at a time when lowering enroll-ments and a funding squeeze put on more explicit pressure for public accountability.Observing that higher education is viewed in Europe with "skepticism" to "hostility,"he drew on his own experience, as he suggested all educators necessarily must, tocounsel his American peers. Lord Briggs, provost of Worcester College, Oxford, hasbeen head of the British Open University and a member of the University GrantsCommittee. He served for several Years with the latter group, which receives a globalsum from the government and allocates to individual institutions.

Period of Uncertainty

From his chores, Lord Briggs sensed a "period of uncertainty in the worldabout the relationship between education, society, government and culture," aperiod itself of uncertain duration. In Great Britain these relationshipscarry with them "a certain amount of mystery," which by common law evenparliamentary inquiry cannot penetrate. He indicated national funding ofhigher education in Great Britain has gone from an early period of "going onhunch"; through a sophisticated form of five-year planning based on existingcosts of maintenance per student teaching costs and research and developmentcosts; to a present system of carefully determined institutional cost limits.

Reed for Psychologically Sound Understanding

In Lord Briggs' view, higher education planning calls more for psychologicallysound understanding than for mere statistics. He said that because everythingin education, as in all government and society, is linked with everything else,sound governance calls for: (1) enlightened oversight, since no matter howprecisely government identifies its objectives for higher education, the outcomewill depend upon the cooperation of people within the institutions; (2) informedinsight, since communication within and without institutions and systems islimited in all our socities; (3) foresight, since the notion that if you justekeep on funding things they will improve cannot today be so confidently assumed;and finally; (4) hindsight, "so you can be sure that you are accountable toyour whole society for what it is you are doing."

Ravised Premises for Unexpected Program Preferences

Lord Briggs recalled that the premises undergirding the launching of the OpenUniversity in Great Britain had to be revised in response to unexpected programpreferences. This led to a whole battery of educational techniques of whichtelevision courses was simply the most avant-garde. Confessing there are onlyabout 25 leaders in all of Europe who can speak with authority and be listened

-3-

to about higher education, Lord Briggs said, "We must all be concerned withcreating a solid bloc of people in all our societies who are concerned withgetting the relationship of government and higher education right.' He stressedthat such blocs can promote quality in higher education through the buildingofmorale within the profession to help it weather the problems of enrollment'andfunding declines.

Lyman A. Glenny: Response to Fiscal Stress

A detailed analysis by University of California Professor Lyman A. Glenny, of hisstudy of response to fiscal stress by 10 California institutions, set the IEPslate for much of what was said at Shangri-la. He suggested that the scale andvariety of demographic shifts are little comprehended. For example, by the year2000 about 80 percent of the seven million people in Los Angeles County will beBlack or Chicano and many of them will be ill-prepared for college even if theyhave been graduated from high school. But the uncertainties, he pointed out,particularly in an inflating economy, contribute to a national mood of conservatismthat infects presidential candidates and college students alike. The mood invadesfaculty now divided by a collective bargaining atmosphere, managers and employees.

Uneven Enrollment Trends

Uneven enrollment trends, with some colleges down as much as 40 percent andothers up 10 percent, are a long-run affair of 10-15 years in Glenny's reckoning.Within institution:, he noted, "we don't and can't switch teachers" as customerdemand for some disciplines expands (business administration up 60 percent) andfor others declines (hard sciences down as much as 40 percent).

Deterioration of Programs

Those public institutions that are expanding are not having their growthadequately funded. For those contracting, Glenny cautioned that across-the-board budget cuts take funding from strong programs as well as from weak ones.He scored as an euphemism the drive for "preserving the integrity of theprogram" through status quo staffing when "it could mean simply holding theprogram together so students will have a place to go." He warned that manyprograms are deteriorating through elimination of part-time specialists, bycutting of administrative help and by counting on attrition. "People don't dieselectively," he quipped. Glenny, suggesting a role for the statewide boards,said they should set guidelines for program changes and staff reductions, dowise and continuing monitoring through program review and then leave the actualadjustments to the individual institutions.

-4-

Balancing Available Resources with Societal and Student .Demand

Glenny advanced three ideas for consideration in the balancing of availableresources with societal and student demand. Although the Carnegie Corporationis against ft, Glenny said he has seen enrollment ceilings for public institu-tions reduce student "raiding" and some institutions have experimented withcodes of fair recruitment practice for the same purpose. But he admitted that"codes are largely ignored when an institution gets into trouble." Legislatures,he suggested, could create a resource allocation reserve, three percent forexample, for helping institutions "doing an exemplary job in reorganizing tomaintain quality."

Richard Ingram: Role of Trustees and Regents

Richard T. Ingramt Vice President of the Association of Governing Boards (AGB),regretted that the Glenny account did not touch on the role of trustees andregents in the institutional response to stress. Ingram suspected that too oftenfaculty and college administrations see the laymen as "individuals who should bekept as far as possible from the rigors of reduction, allocation and retrenchmentdecisions because: (1) they would be meddling in administrative matters, or (2) theydo not understand academic programs and faculty personnel matters, or (3) they wouldunnecessarily delay good decisions by requiring more data and asking too manyquestions, or (4) all of the above."

Ingram cited in some detail a five-year planning document by President Joseph C.Burke of Plattsburg State University of New York. The university is planning toreduce enrollment' approximately from 5,700 in 1930-81 to 5,300 in 1985-86 eventhough the current enrollment probably could be maintained. Burke writes that hisplan "does not require what the state doesn't have to give." The state, Burkeargues, should take the profit out of growth and cushion the-impact of plannedreductions by funding enrollment growth at 75 percent of cost in mature institutionsand by deducting for decreased enrollment at 75 percent. He would allow internalreallocation of funds under planned enrollment reduction and reqUire such realloca-tion, in addition to raising funds from other sources, if enrollment is allowed toincrease. The plan indicates that state control should be exercised through educa-tional post-audit rather than pre-audit and that faculty development should beencouraged in public institutions by seeking outside resources and by exchangingprofessorships with other institutions.

Robert Lewis: Shared Objectives

Ingram's good humor about governing boards was echoed by AGB Chairman Robert L.Lewis who said it is an "almost truth" to see trustees and education executives.as at once "natural enemies," but the real truth is "that we are natural friends. . .

and have a common objective. He told the executives you can accomplish what you

-5,

10

want only through us (trustees)." The irony, according to Lewis, is that on-the-jobtraining of trustees is slow and inadequate and that by default the presidents arethe principal resource for preparing them; yet the presidents themselves are unpre-pared to train the trustees." But, Lewis added, "we are ready to be told . . . dis-

abuse us of all fears Cas we) grope for hope."

Robert Berdahl: Goal of Deparochialization

Describing his role as that of a "sympathetic but cowardly observer, Robert Berdahl,then Chairman of the Department of Higher Education at the State University of NewYork at Buffalo, and currently with the College of Education, University of Maryland,put on his hat as a "card carrying faculty member" and argued that "deparochializa-tion" of academic disciplies must be one key goal for any statewide board. That ismade more difficult, he said, by the "we-they" cast of collective bargaining anda "zero sum mentality" among some faculty that for anything to be added somethinghas to be taken away. Although faculty can be "stubborn mules," Berdahl thoughtthey can be persuaded by objective statewide data, communicated directly to formalfaculty governing boards, perhaps through a statewide advisory network. This

could, he said, "bring out the self-policing potential within the faculty."

E.T. Dunlap: Progress of IEP

At the wind-up of the sessions, Oklahoma's Executive Director of the Board of HigherEducation, E.T. Dunlap, spoke as the IEP Planning Committee Chairman. Tracing theprogress of IEP with W.K. Kellogg and Frost Foundations funding, he solicited anunanimous affirmation of the continuation of similar programs. The session endedwith a long tribute of applause to Warren Hill, retiring Executive Director of ECS.

Copies of Ingram's and Lewis' papers are available from: Dr. Louis Rabineau,Director,- Inservice Education Program, Education Commission of the States, 1860Lincoln Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80295.

MEMORABLE QUOTATIONS FROM THE SEMINAR

"The job of statewide boards is to think the unthinkable."--Elizabeth H. Johnson,Oregon Educational Coordinating Commission.

"It is the new kid on the block who is having the greatest enrollment loss."--LymanA. Glenny, University of California, Berkeley.

"What must be expected of government is a policy that enables the institutionsthemselves to get on with the job."--Lord Asa Briggs, Worcester College, Oxford.

"A high priority of education governance (in New York) is to improve the rate ofhigh school completion."--Laura Chodos, New York Board of Regents.

"If academic inflation were to follow economic inflation, who would want to investin it?"--Jane P. Burke, Alabama Commission on Higher Education.

"You can get flexibility only by cutting programs or faculty."--Lyman A. Glenny.

"Open meetings of statewide boards of education, public hearings and shared researchserve to maintain the credibility of statewide boards . . . The name of the game isthat boards of higher education must get involved in the legislation affectinghigher education."--Allen R. Bares, State Senator, Louisiana.

"(Colleges and universities) are not sausage factories. It is important not tomake the remedy worse than the disease."--Robert,Berdahl, University of New. York(Buffalo).

"If you want to stop the Propositions 13 and you want to do a job of coordinating,you've got to have the acceptance from the legislature."--Wendell W. Wood, NebraskaCoordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education.

"What the chief executive officer of a statewide board feeds to its members is whathe wants you to know to solve his problems."--Lyman A. Glenny.

"(In recommencing statewide meetings of all concerned with higher education) Whata 'fella' is generally down on is what he ain't up on."--Virginia G. Young,Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education.

"(On the American Council on Education report downgrading the likelihood ofsubstantial college enrollment declines) I was aghast that any reliable agencycould have put it out."--Lyman A. Glenny.

INSERVICE EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP) SEMINAR

Invitational Seminar for Members of statewide Coordinating and Governing BoardsIn Conjunction With the SHEEO 227th Annual Meeting

Sponsored byINSERVICE EDUCATION PROGRAM OEM of

STATE HIGHER EDUCATION EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (SHEEO)

and the EDUCATION COMMISSION OF THE STATES (ECS)and by the

ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNING BOARDS OF UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES (AGM

August 11- 12,1980 Shangri-la Afton, Oklahoma

PROGRAM

Monday, August 11, 1980

Registration

ReceptionHost: Chancellor E. T. DUNLAP and the Oklahoma State Regents for

Higher Education

DinnerPresiding: JAMES M. FURMAN, SHEEO President and Executive Director,

Board of Higher Education, Illinois

Relations Between Universities and Governments in Time of.IncreasingAccountabilityIntroduction: PAM RYMER, Chairperson, California Postsecondary Education

Commission and Attorney at Law, Los Angeles

Keynoter: Lord ASA BRIGGS, Provost, Worcester College, Oxford University,England

Tuesday, August 12, 1980

Registration

BreakfastPresiding: ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Member, Oregon Educational

Coordinating Commission and Chair, IEP Advisory CouncilOverview: LOUIS RABINEAU, Director, Inservice Education Program.

Education Commission of the States

General SessionPresiding: GORDON WILLIS, Vice Chairman, State Council of Higher

Education, Virginia

Institutional Reactions Under Conditions of Fiscal StressPresenter: LYMAN A. GLENNY, Professor of Higher Education, University of

California, Berkeley

. Questions and Answers

Coffee Break

-8-

Tuesday, August 12 1980 conr,

Comments and DiscussionCommentators: LAURA CHODOS, Regent, Board of Regents. University of the

State of New YorkRICHARD T. INGRAM. Vice President, Association of Governing

Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB). Washington, D.C.JANE BURKE, Member, Alabama Commission on Higher

EducationLuncheonPresiding: GERALDINE CARTER, Vice President, Minnesota Higher

Education Coordinating Board, Minneapolis

General SessionPresiding: SCOTT E. ORBISON, Chairman, Oklahoma State Regents for

Higher Education

How Might Statewide Boards Continue to Enhance Relationships With TheirConstituents?Discussants: ALLEN R. BARES, State Senator, Louisiana

ROBERT BERDAHL, Chairman, Department of Higher Education,State University of New York at Buffalo

ROBERT L. LEWIS, Chairperson, Association of Governing Boardsof Universities and Colleges (AGB), Washington, D.C.

WENDELL W. WOOD, Executive Committee, NebraskaCoordinating Commission for. Postsecondary Education. Lincoln

Open Forum

Town MeetingChairperson:

Commentator:

E. T. DUNLAP, Chairperson. Inservice Education ProgramPlanning Board and Chancellor, Oklahoma State Regentsfor Higher Education

ALLISON S. COWLES, Vice Chairwoman, Washington StateCouncil for Postsecondary Education, Spokane

ReceptionHosts: State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) and Association

of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB)

Adjournment

Program Coordinator: LOUIS RABINEAU, Education Commission of the States

AGB Liaison: RICHARD T. INGRAM, Vice President, Association ofGoverning Boards of Universities and Colleges

IEP Assistant Director: JANET ROGERS CLARKE, Education Commission of theStates

Program Editor: BICE CLE4OW, Contributing Editor, West Hartford News,Connecticut

Program AdministrativeAssistant: CECE LOGAN, Education Commission of the States

The Inservice Education Program is funded primarily by grants from theW. K. Kellogg Foundation and the Frost Foundation, with additional funds from ECS and SHEEO.

Shangri-la

NAME

ALLEE, Bob F.

ARCENEAUX, William

.ARMAGAST, Judy

BARES, Allen R.

BERDAHL, Robert O.

BLAKEMAN, David

BODET, Robert J.

BRIGGS, Lord Asa

BROWDER, Bill

BROWN, Wayne

BURKE, Jane P.

CALLAHAN, Mary Jo

LIST OF ATTENDEES

August 11-12, 1980

TITLE

Regent, Oklahoma StateRegents for Higher Educ.

Commissioner ofHigher Education

Commissioner, ColoradoCommission on HigherEducation

State Senator

Professor, StateUniversity of New York

Assistant ChancellorOklahoma State Regents forHigher Education

Member, Louisiana Boardof Regents

Provost, WorcesterCollege, OxfordUniversity

Chairman, IllinoisBoard of Higher Educ.

Executive DirectorTennessee HigherEducation Commission

Member, AlabamaCommission on HigherEducation

Commissioner, AlabamaCommissioner on HigherEducation

-10-

1E

Afton, Oklahoma

ADDRESS

1513 North RandallElk City, OK 73644

One Amer c.J., Place, #1530Baton ROL15, LA 70825

94 Monterey Ave.Alamosa, CO 81101

P.O. Box 2400Lafayette, LA 70502

479 Baldy HallBuffalo, NY 14226

500 Education Bldg.State Capitol ComplexOklahoma City, OK 73105

P.O. Box 6793Metairie, LA 70011

Oxford UniversityOxford, England

90 Half Day RoadLincolnshire, IL 60015

501 Union Building, Suite 300Nashville, TN 37219

#6 Woodland CircleArab, AL 35016

P.O. Box 7491-ABirmingham, AL' 35223

CALLAN, Patrick M.

CARR, William D.

CARTER, Geraldine

CH000S, Lavra

CLARKE, Janet Rogers

CLEMOW Bice

CONARD, John J.

COWLES, Allison S.

DAVIES, Gordon

DUESENBERG, ROBERT H.

DUNLAP, E.T.

FARNSWORTH, Sue S.

FOLGER, John K.

Director, California Post-secondary Education

Associate ExecutiveDirector, Commissionon Higher Education

Vice President,Minnesota HigherEducation CoordinatingBoard

Regent, Board of RegentsUniversity of the State ofNew York

Assistant Director, IEPEducation Commissionof the States

Contributing EditorWest Hartford News

Executive OfficerKansas State Boardof Regents

Vice ChairmanWashington State Councilfor Postsecondary Educ.

Director, State Councilof Higher Education

Chairman, MissouriCoordinating Board forHigher Education

Chancellor, State.Regents for HigherEducation

President, WestVirginia Board ofRegents

Associate Executive DirectorPolicy t PlanningEducation Commission of theStates

16

1020 12th St.2nd FloorSacramento, CA 95814

One Court Square, #221Montgomery, AL 36104

1222 Washburn No.Minneapolis, MN 55411

Box 320, RD 2Rexford, NY 12148

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

Box OneWest Hartford, CT 06107

1416 Merchants BankTopeka, KS 66612

E. 1727 20thSpokane, WA 99203

700 Fidelity Building9th & Main StreetsRichmond, VA 23219

400 South FourthSt. Louis, MO 63166

500 Education BuildingState Capitol ComplexOklahoma City, OK 73105

1217 Chapline StreetWheeling, WV 26003

1860 Lincoln StreetSuite 300Denver, CO 80295

FULLER, William S.

FURMAN, James

GILBERT, John G.

GLADES, Margaret A.

GLENNY, Lyman

GRIFFITH, Charles I.

HANSEN, Russell A.

HILL, Warren G.

HOLLANDER, Ted

HUFF, Robert A.

INGRAM, Richard T.

Executive DirectorNebraska CoordinatingCommission forPostsecondary Education

Executive DirectorIllinois Board ofHigher Education

Member, Illinois Boardof Higher Education

Regent, Kansas Boardof Regents

Professor, Universityof California, Berkeley

Chief, CSCE BranchU.S. Department ofEducation

Executive OfficerWyoming Joint Subcommitteefor Postsecondary Education

Executive DirectorEducation Commissionof the States

Chancellor, Departmentof Higher Education

Executive CoordinatorState Board of Regents

Vice PresidentAssociation of GoverningBoards

JACOBSON, Bob Assistant EditorChronicle of HigherEducation

JOHNSON, Elizabeth H.

JONES, Donald E. Chairman, Wyoming 1202Commission

Commissioner, OregonEducational CoordinatingCommission

-12-

Box 95005301 Centennial Mall SouthLincoln, NE 68509

200 E. Chestnut, #721Chicago, IL 60611

P.O. Box 1058Carbondale, IL 62901

801 N. GreenYates Center, KS 66783

3123 Lippizaner LaneWalnut Creek, CA 94598

400 Maryland Ave., S.W.Room 3717 ROBWashington, D.C. 20202

1720 Carey AvenueCheyenne, WY 82002

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

225 West State StreetTrenton, NJ 08625

1535 West JeffersonPhoenix, AZ 85007

One Dupont Circle, #720Washington, D.C. 20036

9061 W. Jewell PlaceLakewood, CO 80227

P.O. Box 356Redmond, OR 97756

Box 848Torrington, WY 82240

KAUFMAN, Martha

KEITEL, Peter

KERSCHNER, Lee R.

KIRKWOOD, Robert

KLINE, Richard R.

KNORR, Sheldon H.

LEWIS, Robert L.

LOGAN, Cece

MACKIE, Bert H.

MC CARREY, Leon R.

MC MULLEN, Sandra

MILAM, Charles R.

MILLARD, Richard M.

MILLER, George

Project ConsultantPostsecondary EducationEducation Commission of theStates

Vice PresidentNew York State HigherEducation Services Corp.

Executive DirectorColorado Commission onHigher Education

Executive DirectorCommission on HigherEducation/Middle StatesAssociation

Member, Maryland Board forHigher Education

Commissioner, MarylandBoard for HigherEducation

Chairperson, Associationof Governing Boards

Program AdministrativeAssistant, EducationCommission of the States

Oklahoma Regent

Deputy CommissionerUtah System of HigherEducation

Regents Kansas Boardof Regents

Member, LouisianaBoard of Regents

Director, PostsecondaryEducation, EducationCommission of the States

Chairman, NebraskaCoordinating Commissionfor Postsecondary Educ.

-13-

is

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

99 Washington Ave.Albany, NY 12255

1550 Lincoln StreetDenver, CO 80203

3624 Market StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19104

16 FrancisAnnapolis,

16 FrancisAnnapolis,

StreetMD 21401

StreetMD 21401

One Dupont Circle, #720Washington, D.C. 20036

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

3218 NeilsonEnid, OK 73701

807 East South TempleSalt Lake City, UT 84102

1800 East 56thHutchison, KS 67501

P.O. Box 53787Lafayette, LA 70505

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite.300Denver, CO 80295

1122 S. GrandviewPapillion, NE 68046

MILLS, Jim Oklahoma State Regent

NORRIS, Gail

NYGAARD, Lloyd H.

ORBISON, Scott E.

Executive CoordinatorWashington State Councilfor Postsecondary Educ.

Asst. Commissioner &Executive SecretaryNorth Dakota Board ofHigher Education

Chairman, OklahomaState Regents for.Higher Education

PARKER, Anne Laura R. Member, Alabama Commissionon Higher Educ.

PATTEN, John H.

PRESTRIDGE, R.M.

RABINEAU, Louis

RAMSEY, Robert A.

RESHETNIAK, Valerie A.

RYLAND, Jane N.

RYMER, Pamela Ann

Member, OklahomaState Regents forHigher Education

Member, LouisianaBoard of Regents

Director, InserviceEducation ProgramEducation Commission ofthe States

Chancellor

West Virginia'Board ofRegents

Conference CoordinatorEducation Commissionof the States

Director, SHEEC/NCESNetwork

Chairman, CaliforniaPostsecondaryEducation Commission

Drawer 489McAlester, OK 74501

908East Fifth AvenueOlympia, WA 98504

10th Floor, State CapitolBismarck, ND 58505

4218 E. 42nd PlaceTulsa, OK 74135

Four Squirrel DriveOzark, AL 35360

P.O. Box 270Norman, OK 73071

P.O. Box 5262Bossier City, LA 71111

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

950 Kanawha Blvd. ECharleston, WVA 25301

1860 Lincoln Street, Suite 300Denver, CO 80295

737 29th StreetBoulder, CO 80303

800 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1480Los Angeles, CA 90017

SNYDER, Harry M.

SOUTHERN, Lee

SWEARINGEN, Eugene

THRASHE,E.

VAUGHT, Russell D.

WEBB, William A.

WILLIS, Gordon C.

WOOD, W.W.

YOUNG, Virginia G.

Executive DirectorCounci on HigherEducation

Member, UniversitiesCouncil of BritishColumbia

Chairman Executive Comm.Oklahoma Board of Regents

Executive Secretary .&Director, Board ofTrustees of StateInstitutions of HigherLearning

Member, Oklahoma StateBoard of Regents

Deputy Commissioner.Coordinating BoardTexas College & University

Vice Chairman, VirginiaState Council ofHigher Education

Executive CommitteeNebraska CoordinatingCommission forPostsecondary Education

Member, MissouriCoordinating Board forHigher Education

US 127 SouthW. Frankfort ComplexFrankfort, KY 40601

500 805 West BroadwayVancouver, B.C.,Canada V5Z 1K1

2650 E. 66th St.Oklahoma City, OK 74136

P.O. Box 2336Jackson, MS. 39205

304 Country Club CircleMidwest City, OK 73110

P.O. Box 12788Capitol StationAustin, TX 78731

P.O. Box 8425Roanoke, VA 24014

Box 100North `Platte, NE 69101

10 E. Parkway DriveColumbia, MO 65201

INSERVICE EDUCATION PROGRAM (IEP) PLANNING BOARD

E. T. Dunlap (Chairman)ChancellorOklahoma State Regents for

Higher Education

William ArceneauxCommissioner of HigherEducation

Louisiana State Board ofRegents

Kenneth H. AshworthCommissionerCoordinating BoardTexas College and

University System

Patrick M. CallanDirectorCalifornia Postsecondary

Education Commission

University Resource Members

Alexander AstinUniversity of Californiaat Los Angeles

Robert 0. BerdahlUniversity of Maryland

John K. FolgerAssociate Executive DirectorPolicy and PlanningEducation Commission of the

States

James M. FurmanVice PresidentMacArthur Foundation andImmediate Past PresidentState Higher Education

Executive Officers

Ex Officio

Dorothy G. Harrison-BlaneyDeputy CommissionerBoard of RegentsUniversity of the Stateof New York

State Department of Education

Robert R. RamseyChancellorWest Virginia Board of

Regents

S. V. MartoranaPennsylvania State University

Allan 0. PfnisterUniversity of Denver

Sheldon H. KnorrCommissionerMaryland Board for HigherEducation and

PresidentState Higher Education

Executive Officers

Richard M. MillardDirectorDepartment of PostsecondaryEducation

Education Commission of theStates

Louis RabineauDirectorInservice Education ProgramEducation Commission of the

States

Geraldine CarterMinnesota Higher EducationCoordinating Board

Allison S. CowlesWashington State Council for

Postsecondary Education

E. T. DunlapOklahoma State Regents

for Higher Education

SEMINAR PLANNING COMMITTEE

Richard T. IngramAssociation of Governing

Boards of Universitiesand Colleges

Washington, D.C.

Donald H. Mc GannonConnecticut Board of

Higher Education

John H. PattenOklahoma State Regents

for Higher Education

Pam RymerCalifornia Postsecondary

Education Commission