donhuberglyphosateoct2011europe uk release short
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
1/28
Glyphosate Effects on Crops,
Soils, Animals, and Consumers
Don M. Huber
Emeritus Professor of Plant Pathology
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Europe - UK
October 31, 2011
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
2/28
The Importance of Reducing Stresses
Potential - Stresses = YieldThere is no free lunch!
Harvest
Nutrition
Physiology
Management
EnvironmentDiseases
Pests
=
Genetic
Potential -
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
3/28
Components of plant parts as well as
Activators,
Inhibitors,
and Regulators
of Physiological Processes
Nutrients are:
Many herbicides and pesticides are chelato
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
4/28
PLANT
ABIOTICENVIRONMENT
NutrientsMoistureTemperaturepH (redox potential)Density, gasesAg Chemicals
PATHOGENPopulationVirulenceActivity
BIOTIC ENVIRONMENT
TIME
Interacting Factors DeterminingNutrient Availability and Disease Severity
Vigor, Stage of Growth, Root Exudates
Resistance Susceptibility
Antagonists, SynergistsOxidizers, Reducers
Competitors, Mineralizers[Cu, Fe, K, Mn, N, S, Zn]
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
5/28
Schematic of glyphosate interactions
1. Glyphosate is a systemic,
broad-spectrum herbicide
that intensifies stress
2. Glyphosate accumulates in
plant tissues (shoot and root tip
reproductive structures, and
legume nodules)
3. Some glyphosate moves intoroots and is released into soil
7. Glyphosate accumulates in soil(fast sorption; slow degradation)
Desorbed by phosphorus
Beneficial soil organisms includeN-fixing microbes
Any with bacterial shikimate pathway
N-fixing organisms
Mycorrhizae
Biological control organisms
Earthworms
Plant Growth Promoting organisms
4.Makes the plant susceptible
to diseases
5. Increases virulence of soil-bor
disease organisms
6. Is toxic to normal biological
control and other beneficial
organisms
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
6/28
Microbiocidal Activity
of Glyphosate
Fusarium % change
500
400
300
200
100
0
% of control
100
80
60
40
20
0
After Zobiole et al., 20
Kremer, 2010
Fusarium Pseudomonads Mn reducers IAA producers
root colonization
Glyphosate ra
Control
600 g ae/
1200 g a
2400 g a
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
7/28
CA
B CA
B
A BA B
Glyphosate Increases Disease Susceptibility
Glyphosate Glyphosate No glyphosate Effect of glyphosate on susceptibiSterile soil Field soil Control to anthracnose. A) hypersensitiv
response; B) non-limited responseafter glyphosate is applied.
After Rahe and Johal, 1988; 1990; See also Johal and Huber, 1999; Schafer et al, 2009
Herbicide action is by soil-borne fungal pathoge
C l I l d I l d
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
8/28
Control Inoculated Inoculated+ glyphosate
Non-glyphosateNon-GMO
GMO+glyphosate
Non-glyphosate Glyphosate
Glyphosate No glyphosate
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
9/28
The technology inserts an alternative EPSPS enzyme
that is not blocked by glyphosate inmature tissue
There is nothing in the RR plant that operates on
the glyphosate applied to the plant!Glyphosate chelation is not selective it immobilizes nutrients
Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn
Reduces nutrient uptake
Can cause aYieldDrag It is there for the life of the plant
[Greatly expanded usage of glyphosate]
Whats Special About Genetic Engineering for
Glyphosate Tolerance? (Roundup Ready Genes)
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
10/28
Reduced Nutrient Efficiency of IsogenicRR Soybeans (After Zobiole et al, 2008, 2009)
Tissue: Mn ZnIsoline % %
Normal 100 100
Roundup Ready 83 53
RR + glyphosate 76 45
Copper, iron, and other essential nutrientsWere also lower in the RR isoline and reducedfurther by glyphosate!
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
11/28
Effect of Glyphosate on Lignin, AA, Water Use Efficiency,and Photosynthesis of Glyphosate-Resistant Soybeans
After Zobiole, 2009Lignin(g/plant)
0.6
0.50.40.30.20.10.0
0 450 675 900 1350 1800
Full rate at one time
Sequential half rate
Glyphosate (g a.e./ha)
Amino Acids (g/plant)
250020001500
10005000.0
0 450 675 900 1350 1800Glyphosate (g a.e./ha)
Full rate at one time
Sequential half rate
umol CO2 m-2 s-1
121086420
0 600 1200 1800 2400
13 DAT
36 DAT
Glyphosate (g a.e./ha)
WUE (ml water/g dry mass)600550500450
400350300250
0 450 675 900 1350 1800Glyphosate (g a.e./ha)
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
12/28
%Mineral Reductionin Roundup Ready
Soybeans Treated with Glyphosate
Plant tissue Ca Mg Fe Mn Zn Cu
Young leaves 40 28 7 29 NS NS
Mature leaves 30 34 18 48 30 27
Mature grain 26 13 49 45
Reduced:Yield 26%Biomass 24% After Cakmak et al, 200
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
13/28
Long-term Effect of Glyphosate
after Roemheld et al., 2009
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
14/28
Food and Feed Safety Concerns Increased levels of mycotoxins
- Fusarium toxins (DON, NIV, ZEA)
- Aflatoxins
Gene flow- Weeds
- Soil microbes
- Intestinal microbes
Nutrient deficiency- Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Zn
Direct toxicity of residual glyphosate
- Infertility - endocrine system
- Birth defects, teratogenicity
- Cell death - Disease resistance
Allergenic reactions to foreign proteins
Aris & Leblanc, 2011
Benachour et al, 2007
Carmen, et al., 2011Fernandez, et al., 2009
Gasnier, et al., 2009
Heiman, 2010
Matzk et al, 1996
Seralini et al., 2010, 20
Smith, 2010Walsh, et al., 2000
Watts, 2009
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
15/28
% Reduction in Alfalfa Nutrients by Glyphosa
*Third year, second cutting analysis; Glyphosate applied one time in the previous y
Nutrient % reduction compared with Non-RR
Nitrogen 13 %Phosphorus 15 %
Potassium 46 %
Calcium 17 %
Magnesium 26 %
Sulfur 52 %
Boron 18 %
Copper 20 %
Iron 49 %
Manganese 31 %Zinc 18 %
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
16/28
Stillborne Calf from Manganese Deficienc
U S C l A i i S C
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
17/28
U.S. Cattlemens Association Statement to Congres
Cattle ranchers are facing some puzzling - and, at times,
economically devastating problems with pregnant cows and calves. At
some facilities, high numbers of fetuses are aborting for no apparentreason. Other farmers successfully raise what look to be normal young
cattle, only to learn when the animals are butchered that their carcasses
appear old and, therefore, less valuable.
The sporadic problem is so bad both in the United States and abroadthat in some herds around 40-50 percent of pregnancies are being lost.
Many pesticides and industrial pollutants also possess a hormonal alter
ego.
The viability of this important industry is threatened.
Source: Testimony of the Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrow
of America, to the Senate Agriculture Committee July 24, 2002.
Feed Source Effect on Stomach Liner Color 2010
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
18/28
Feed Source Effect on Stomach Liner Color, 2010
Non-GMO GMOGMO
Eff t f th GM G P t i i
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
19/28
Effect of the GM Gene Proteins in
Corn/Soybeans on Pig Stomachs
2011
Non-GMO Feed GMO Feed
Normal color Inflamed, irrita
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
20/28
A d th Mi P f
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
21/28
GMOCorn Non-GMO
Corn
And the Mice Prefer
Photos: Gilbert Hoste
Direct Toxicity of Glyphosate
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
22/28
Direct Toxicity of GlyphosateRate (ppm) System affected Reference
0.5 Human cell endocrine disruption Toxicology 262:184-196, 200
0.5 Anti-androgenic Gasner et al, 20091.0 Disrupts aramatase enzymes Gasnier et al, 2009
1-10 Inhibits LDH, AST, ALF enzymes Malatesta et al, 2005
1-10 Damages liver, mitochondria, nuclei Malatesta et al, 2005
2.0 Anti-Oestrogenic Gasnier et al, 2009
5.0 DNA damage Toxicology 262:184-196, 2005.0 Human placental, umbilical, embryo Chem.Res.Toxicol. J. 22:200
10 Cytotoxic Toxicology 262:184-196, 200
10 Multiple cell damage Seralini et al, 2009
10 Total cell death Chem.Res.Toxicol. J. 22:200
All Systemic throughout body Andon et al, 20091-10 Suppress mitochondrial respiration Peixoto et al, 2005
Parkinsons El Demerdash et al, 2001
POEA, AMPA even more toxic Seralini et al, 2009
Late term
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
23/28
Late termSpontaneous
Abortion(Miscarriage)
Fungus-like Growth Size of organism compared
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
24/28
38,250 X magnification Size relative to gram+ bacterium
Fungus like Growth(transmission EM)
Size of organism comparedwith alfa-Streptococcus
Occurrence
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
25/28
Occurrence
Verified in IA, IL, KY, MI, NE, ND, SD, WI
Sources: Environmental Animal tissueSoybean meal Placental tissue
Silage Amniotic fluid
Corn grain and silage Semen
SDS Soybean plants Stomach contentsManure Eggs
Soil Milk
Fusarium solani fspglycines mycelium
Potential Interactions of new entity with Glyphosate
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
26/28
Potential Interactions of new entity with Glyphosate Glyphosate affects plants (predisposes):
Inhibits plant defenses
Reduces nutrient content and efficiency [chemical and RR gene(s)]
Increases root colonization
Increases membrane permeability
Surfactant affect for penetration of natural openings and wounds
Glyphosate affects animals (predisposes):Inhibits aramatose systemendocrine hormone system
Toxic to liver, placental, testicular, and kidney cells
Reduced defense - liver function [from lower Mn, etc. in feed]
Glyphosate affects pathogens:Stimulates growth and virulence (direct/indirect)
Favors synergism, infection (as a carrier)
Increases movement into plant tissues (water film for plant infection)
Glyphosate affects the environment:Toxic to soil microbes that constrain plant pathogens
Micronutrient availability reduced
F il t H
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
27/28
* Scientific Precautionary Principle1. Margin of safety to prevent damage
2. Anticipation of unknowns
3. Initiate as a pilot project
* Not Substantially Equivalent- Significant deviation1. Expression of end products (new/tissues in)
2. More like virus infection than sexual transfer
3. Functional and regulatory controls absent
4. Greatly extended exposure
5. Production, quality, safety & toxicity differ
After Brown, 2000
Failure to Honor
Potential Far-Reaching Impact of Glyphosate
-
8/3/2019 DonHuberGlyphosateOct2011Europe UK Release Short
28/28
Potential Far-Reaching Impact of Glyphosate
GlyphosateMn
Glyphosate
(Chelation)
AnimalsMineral malnourished
Slow growth, Allergies, Disease
MYCOTOXINSScours, death, BSE, wasting, predisposition
Plants, feedLower nutrient minerals
(Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn)
Disease predisposition(Scab, take-all, CVC)
Mycotoxins, glyphosate
HumanMineral malnourished,
Allergies, Fertility, DiseaseMYCOTOXINS
Alzheimers, gout, diabetes, viruses, Parkinson;s, etc.
Vegetables, fruits, grainsLower nutrient minerals
(Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Zn)
Carriers for epiphytes(E. coli, etc. )
(Changed epiphytic flora)
EnvironmentBiological imbalanceN fixation, Mn availabilityPotassium immobilization
Biological controlsGLYPHOSATE ACCUMULATION