double nucleophilic attack on isocyanide carbon: a synthetic strategy for 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles
TRANSCRIPT
12228 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 12228–12230 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 12228–12230
Double nucleophilic attack on isocyanide carbon: a synthetic strategy
for 7-aza-tetrahydroindolesw
Yifei Li, Xianxiu Xu,* Chunyu Xia, Lingjuan Zhang, Ling Pan and Qun Liu*
Received 15th August 2012, Accepted 30th October 2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cc35896d
A novel and efficient route for the synthesis of 7-aza-tetra-
hydroindoles from N-aryl/alkyl-alkenoylacetamides and ethyl
isocyanoacetate is described. A mechanism, involving a stepwise
[3+2] cycloaddition–intramolecular aza-Michael addition cascade,
is proposed that explains the origin of the double nucleophilic
attack on the isocyanide carbon atom.
In organic synthesis, the one-pot tandem strategy is used to
improve the efficiency of a chemical reaction whereby multiple
bonds are formed in a single reaction without the need to isolate
intermediates.1 As part of our research to develop divinyl ketones
(DVKs) as 1,5-dielectrophiles for the construction of diverse
carbo- and heterocyclic structures,2 we recently reported the
one-pot synthesis of highly substituted phenols,3a 2,3-dihydro-
4-pyridones,3b pyrrolizidines,3c and C2-tethered pyrrole/oxazole
pairs,4 via a [5+1] annulation (inter-/intramolecular Michael
addition sequence). For example, catalyzed by DBU (DBU =
1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene), the reaction of DVKs 1 with
ethyl isocyanoacetate 2 can lead to C2-tethered pyrrole/oxazole
pairs in moderate to high yields in the case of R1 is an aryl
group (Scheme 1). Whereas, under identical conditions, highly
functionalized 7-aza-tetrahydroindole 3a is produced in 61%
yield from the reaction of DVK 1a bearing a bulky t-Bu R1
group. In the reaction, the ketene dithioacetal moiety is intact.4 To
our knowledge, the construction of 3amentioned above represents
the first example of one-pot synthesis of 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles
from readily available acyclic precursors, which prompted us
to find an efficient route to their synthesis from identical
starting materials (i.e., N-aryl/alkyl-alkenoylacetamides (1)4,5
and ethyl isocyanoacetate (2))6 by catalyst variation.
The construction of distinct types of complex molecules
from identical starting materials is an attractive and challenging
task in organic synthesis.7 On the other hand, although isocyanides
have found a wide range of applications due to the dual
electrophilic and nucleophilic character of the isocyanide
carbon atom,6 the development of new trends in the field of
isocyanide-based reactions occupies a unique position in organic
synthesis.3c,4,6 Furthermore, the synthesis of the azacyclic systems
related to 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3 is crucial since several
alkaloids8–11 including chaetominine8 and neoxaline (Fig. 1)9
have shown significant biological activities. In their synthesis,
a key step to form the bicyclic aminal system was realized
through aza-cyclization via the corresponding 2-haloindole
intermediates.8b,c,10 Very recently, a four-step synthesis to
7-aza-tetrahydroindoles starting from N-alkylated a-bromo-
acetamides was described.12 However, the direct synthesis of
this heterocyclic skeleton remains a challenge.8–12 The study
described here reveals that 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3 (Table 2)
and 6 (Scheme 3) can be synthesized in a single step from the
reactions of ethyl isocyanoacetate 2 with a range of readily
available N-aryl/alkyl-alkenoylacetamides 14,5 and 55,13 in an
atom economical manner under mild conditions.
Different from the formation of C2-tethered pyrrole/oxazole
pairs involving a [5+1] annulation intermediate, the formation of
a pyrroline intermediate via [3+2] cycloaddition of the enone
moiety of 1 is required for the synthesis of 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles
(Scheme 1).4 In this research, initially, the reaction of 1a (R1 =
t-Bu, R2 = Tol) with ethyl isocyanoacetate 2 was attempted in
the presence of AgOAc to test the possibility of the stepwise
[3+2] cycloaddition of the enone moiety of 1a.14 However,
catalyzed by AgOAc (0.1 equiv.), no reaction was observed by
treatment of 1a (1.0 mmol) with 2 (1.2 equiv.) in acetonitrile
(5 mL) at room temperature for long reaction times due to the
Scheme 1 Reactions of DVKs 1 with 2 under basic conditions.
Fig. 1 Structures of chaetominine and neoxaline.
Department of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun130024, China. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected];Fax: +86 431 85099759; Tel: +86 431 85099759w Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimentaldetails and spectral data for 3, 4b and 6. See DOI: 10.1039/c2cc35896d
ChemComm Dynamic Article Links
www.rsc.org/chemcomm COMMUNICATION
Dow
nloa
ded
by S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity o
n 18
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
31
Oct
ober
201
2 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/C
2CC
3589
6DView Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 12228–12230 12229
bulky t-Bu R1 group (Scheme 2A). Gratifyingly, under similar
conditions, pyrroline 4b could be obtained in 50% yield (1 : 1
mixture of trans to cis isomer)14a from 1b (R1 = p-ClC6H4,
R2=Tol) and 2 at 10 1C for 24 h, along with the recovery of 45%
of 1b (Scheme 2B).15 Subsequently, it was found that treatment of
diastereopure 4b15 with K2CO3 led to 7-aza-tetrahydroindole
3b in a diastereospecific manner and in quantitative yield via
intramolecular aza-Michael addition (Scheme 2C).4,5
A comparison of the above results with previous studies4
indicates that the reaction pathways of 1 with 2 could be tuned
by varying only the catalyst (Scheme 2B versus Scheme 1).7
Encouraged by the above results (Schemes 2B and C), we
further examined the reaction of 1b with 2 in the presence of
AgOAc and a suitable base aiming at the synthesis of 7-aza-
tetrahydroindoles 3 in one-pot. Indeed, catalyzed by AgOAc
(0.1 equiv.) and K2CO3 (0.2 equiv.), 3b was obtained in 97%
yield from the reaction of 1b (1.0 mmol) with 2 (1.2 equiv.) in
acetonitrile (5 mL) at room temperature for only 1.5 h
(Table 1, entry 2). Further optimization of reaction conditions
allowed us to find that 3b could be obtained in nearly
quantitative yield within shorter reaction time when DBU
was employed as the base (Table 1, entry 1). In comparison,
Cu(OAc)2 was a less effective catalyst than AgOAc (Table 1,
entry 4). However, under optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 1),
no reaction occurred between 1a and 2 even after long reaction
times (24 h, Scheme 2A) due to the steric hindrance of the
bulky t-Bu group.16
Further experiments showed that the reaction proceeded
more efficiently for various N-aryl-alkenoylacetamides 1 under
optimal conditions (Table 1, entry 1) and the results are
summarized in Table 2. For example, the reactions of ethyl
isocyanoacetate 2 with 1b–j (R2 = Tol) having an alkyl (entry 8),
styrenyl (entry 9), phenyl (entry 2), electron-rich (entries 3–5) and
electron-deficient aryl (entries 1 and 7), or heteroaryl R1 group
(entry 6) can afford the corresponding 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles
3b–j in excellent yield under very mild conditions. In addition,
under identical conditions, the reactions of 2 with 1k and 1l
(R2 = Ph) gave 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3k and 3l, respectively,
in excellent yield (entries 10 and 11). In the cases of 1m–o bearing
an alkyl R2 group, the desired 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3m–o
were also prepared in high yield (entries 12–14) by treatment of
1m–o and 2 with AgOAc (0.1 equiv.) and DBU (0.5 equiv.) for
2–3 h before adding another portion of DBU and stirring for
additional 5 h. In comparison, only the corresponding formal
[3+2] cycloaddition adducts 4m–o were formed without the
addition of additional DBU due to the weaker acidity of N-alkyl
amides than N-aryl amides (entries 1–11 versus entries 12–14).5
The tandem process mentioned above represents a simple
and efficient methodology for the construction of 7-aza-tetra-
hydroindoles.8–12 The starting materials are readily available
acyclic precursors4,5 and the reaction is 100% atom-economic.1
To test the generality of this new reaction, the reactions of
selected 1-cinnamoylcyclopropanecarboxamides (5)5,13 with 2
were further investigated. However, the reaction of 5a (R =
4-ClC6H4) with 2 under above conditions (Table 1, entry 1) for
48 h gave 7-aza-tetrahydroindole 6a in only 30% yield. After
further optimization of the reaction conditions, the desired
products 6a–c were obtained in 81, 85 and 78% yield, respec-
tively, by treating the corresponding 5 (1.0 mmol) and 2
(1.2 equiv.) with AgOAc (0.1 equiv.) and DBU (1.0 equiv.) in
acetonitrile at room temperature for 24 h (Scheme 3). The
results requiring stoichiometric amounts of DBU for substrates
5 (Scheme 3) and catalytic amounts of DBU for substrates 1 are
Scheme 2 Reactions of 1 in the presence of AgOAc.
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions
EntryCat. (equiv.)/base (equiv.) T (1C) T (h) Yielda (%)
Ratiotrans/cisb
1 AgOAc (0.1) rt 1.0 99 57 : 43
DBU (0.2)
2 AgOAc (0.1) rt 1.5 97 55 : 45K2CO3 (0.2)
3 AgOAc (0.1) 10 24 72 50 : 50K2CO3 (0.2)
4 Cu(OAc)2 (0.1) 80 5 48 50 : 50DBU (0.2)
a Isolated yield. b Determined by 1H NMR.
Table 2 Synthesis of 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3
Entry 1 R1 R2 Time (h) 3 Yielda (%) trans/cis
1 b 4-ClC6H4 Tol 1.0 b 99 57 : 432 c Ph Tol 2.0 c 98 50 : 503 d Tol Tol 5.0 d 98 52 : 484 e 4-MeOC6H4 Tol 6.0 e 99 51 : 495 f 3,4-O2CH2C6H3 Tol 2.0 f 99 34 : 666 g 2-Furyl Tol 5.0 g 97 55 : 457 h 4-BrC6H4 Tol 2.0 h 93 38 : 628 i Cyclohexyl Tol 4.0 i 93 53 : 479 j PhCHQCH Tol 4.5 j 98 45 : 5510 k 4-ClC6H4 Ph 8.0 k 90 42 : 5811 l Ph Ph 2.5 l 97 59 : 4112b m 4-ClC6H4 Me 7.0 m 80 59 : 4113b n Ph Me 7.0 n 76 52 : 4814b o Tol Me 8.0 o 78 55 : 45
a Isolated yields. b Reaction conditions: adding DBU (0.5 equiv.) and
stirring for 2–3 h and then adding another portion of DBU (1.0 equiv.)
and stirring for additional 5 h.
Dow
nloa
ded
by S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity o
n 18
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
31
Oct
ober
201
2 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/C
2CC
3589
6D
View Article Online
12230 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 12228–12230 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
in accordance with our previous report for the synthesis of
fused oxazolines.17
Taking together the previous4–6,13a,14 and present results
(Table 2, Schemes 2 and 3), a plausible mechanism for the
formation of 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3 and 6 may involve
(Scheme 4, with the reaction of 1 with 2 as an example): (1)
the formation of pyrroline intermediate 4 in a regiospecific
manner from AgOAc catalyzed stepwise [3+2] cycloaddition
of the enone moiety of 1 and ethyl isocyanoacetate 2
(Scheme 2B)14a and (2) base-catalyzed intramolecular aza-Michael
addition of the pyrroline intermediate to form 7-aza-tetra-
hydroindoles 3 (Scheme 2C).5,13a Based on the experimental
results for the selective formation of either C2-tethered pyrrole/
oxazole pairs4 or 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 3 and 6 (Table 2 and
Scheme 3), it is important to emphasize that the addition of
catalytic amounts of AgOAc can lead to markedly different
regioselectivity. In the absence of AgOAc, the C2-tethered
pyrrole/oxazole pairs would be formed from 1 and 2 via a
[5+1] annulation intermediate 7 (Scheme 4, box).4
In conclusion, we have developed a new atom economical
strategy for the synthesis of various highly functionalized
7-aza-tetrahydroindoles from easily available N-aryl/alkyl-
alkenoylacetamides and ethyl isocyanoacetate in a single step
under mild conditions. A new reaction mechanism, stepwise
[3+2] cycloaddition–intramolecular aza-Michael addition
sequence, is proposed. Further studies are in progress.
Financial support of this research provided by the NNSFC
(21272034, 21172030 and 21072027) and the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities (09 QNJJ017
and 12QNJJ010) is greatly acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 For reviews on tandem reactions, see: (a) L. F. Tietze, H. P. Bell andG. Brasche, Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH,Weinheim, 2006; (b) D. Enders, C. Grondal and M. R. M. Huttl,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1570; (c) K. C. Nicolaou,T. Montagnon and S. A. Snyder, Chem. Commun., 2003, 551;(d) A. Padwa and S. K. Bur, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 5341.
2 For recent reviews, see: (a) L. Pan and Q. Liu, Synlett, 2011, 1073;(b) L. Pan, X. Bi and Q. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev., DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35329F.
3 (a) X. Bi, D. Dong, Q. Liu, W. Pan, L. Zhao and B. Li, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 4578; (b) D. Dong, X. Bi, Q. Liu andF. Cong, Chem. Commun., 2005, 3580; (c) J. Tan, X. Xu, L. Zhang,Y. Li and Q. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2868.
4 Y. Li, X. Xu, J. Tan, C. Xia, D. Zhang and Q. Liu, J. Am. Chem.Soc., 2011, 133, 1775.
5 Y. Li, X. Xu, J. Tan, P. Liao, J. Zhang and Q. Liu, Org. Lett.,2010, 12, 244.
6 For recent reviews, see: (a) A. V. Lygin and A. de Meijere, Angew.Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9094; (b) A. V. Gulevich, A. G. Zhdanko,R. V. A. Orru and V. G. Nenajdenko, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 5235;(c) J. Campo, M. Garcia-Valverde, S. Marcaccini, M. J. Rojo andT. Torroba, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 757.
7 For recent reports, see: (a) B. Alcaide, P. Almendros and T. M. delCampo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6684; (b) X. Jiang,X. Ma, Z. Zheng and S. Ma, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 8572;(c) L. Liu and J. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6093;(d) A. S. Dudnik, Y. Xia, Y. Li and V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem.Soc., 2010, 132, 7645; (e) P. A. Evans, J. R. Sawyer andP. A. Inglesby, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5746;(f) P. Panne and J. M. Fox, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 22.
8 (a) R. H. Jiao, S. Xu, J. Y. Liu, H. M. Ge, H. Ding, C. Xu,H. L. Zhu and R. X. Tan, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 5709;(b) B. Malgesini, B. Forte, D. Borghi, F. Quartieri, C. Gennariand G. Papeo, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 7922; (c) M. Toumi,F. Couty, J. Marrot and G. Evano, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 5027.
9 T. Sunazuka, T. Shirahata, S. Tsuchiya, T. Hirose, R. Mori,Y. Harigaya, I. Kuwajima and S. Ohmura, Org. Lett., 2005,7, 941, and references therein.
10 For kapakahines, see: T. Newhouse, C. A. Lewis, K. J. Eastmanand P. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7119.
11 For perophoramidine, see: (a) S. M. Verbitski, C. L. Mayne,R. A. Davis, G. P. Concepcion and C. M. Ireland, J. Org. Chem.,2002, 67, 7124; (b) J. R. Fuchs and R. L. Funk, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2004, 126, 5068; (c) H. Wu, F. Xue, X. Xiao and Y. Qin, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14052.
12 N. Oukli, S. Comesse, N. Chafi, H. Oulyadi and A. Daıch,Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 1459.
13 (a) F. Liang, S. Lin and Y. Wei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,133, 1781; (b) Z. Zhang, Q. Zhang, S. Sun, T. Xiong and Q. Liu,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1726.
14 (a) R. Grigg, M. I. Lansdell and M. Thornton-Pett, Tetrahedron,1999, 55, 2025; (b) S. Kamijo, C. Kanazawa and Y. Yamamoto,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9260; (c) A. V. Lygin, O. V. Larionov,V. S. Korotkov and A. de Meijere, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 227;for a review on silver-mediated synthesis of heterocycles, see: (d) M.Alvarez-Corral, M. Munoz-Dorado and I. Rodırguez-Garcıa,Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3174.
15 Diastereomers 4b were completely separable by silica columnchromatography.
16 In the presence of DBU (1.0 equiv.) and AgOAc (0.1 equiv.), 7-aza-tetrahydroindole 3a could be obtained in 60% yield when thereaction of 1a (1.0 mmol) with 2 (1.2 equiv.) was performed inacetonitrile (5 mL) at 80 1C for 7 h.
17 L. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Tan, L. Pan, W. Xia and Q. Liu, Chem.Commun., 2010, 46, 3357.
Scheme 3 Synthesis of 7-aza-tetrahydroindoles 6.
Scheme 4 Proposed mechanism for the formation of 3.
Dow
nloa
ded
by S
tanf
ord
Uni
vers
ity o
n 18
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
31
Oct
ober
201
2 on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/C
2CC
3589
6D
View Article Online