2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
Year 2013 Toll Bridge Traffic Volume
And Revenue Projections
Retainer Agreement C-17-11
Submitted to:
Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionCommissionCommissionCommission
New Hope Headquarters and Administration Building
2492 River Road, New Hope, PA 18938-9519
February 12, 2013
Debra Debra Debra Debra A. A. A. A. Ferraro, P.E.Ferraro, P.E.Ferraro, P.E.Ferraro, P.E.
Pennsylvania Professional Engineer License No.: PE048404E
James P. Markham, P.E.James P. Markham, P.E.James P. Markham, P.E.James P. Markham, P.E.
Pennsylvania Professional Engineer License No.: PE061283
New Jersey Professional Engineer License No.: 24GE04272800
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 2
METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 3
YEAR 2013 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ..................................................... 3
RECENT ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ........................................ 4
HISTORICAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................... 7
YEAR 2013 TRAFFIC VOLUME & TOLL REVENUE PROJECTIONS ................. 8
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1: 2007 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 11
TABLE 2: 2008 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 12
TABLE 3: 2009 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 13
TABLE 4: 2010 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 14
TABLE 5: 2011 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 15
TABLE 6: 2012 TOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGE VOLUMES ............................ 16
TABLE 7: 2007 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 17
TABLE 8: 2008 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 18
TABLE 9: 2009 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 19
TABLE 10: 2010 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 20
TABLE 11: 2011 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 21
TABLE 12: 2012 UNADJUSTED TOLL BRIDGE VOLUMES .......................... 22
TABLE 13: TRENTON-MORRISVILLE TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME
AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS ............................................ 23
TABLE 14: NEW HOPE-LAMBERTVILLE TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND
REVENUE PROJECTIONS .................................................. 26
TABLE 15: INTERSTATE 78 TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND REVENUE
PROJECTIONS ................................................................. 29
TABLE 16: EASTON-PHILLIPSBURG TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND
REVENUE PROJECTIONS .................................................. 32
TABLE 17: PORTLAND-COLUMBIA TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND
REVENUE PROJECTIONS .................................................. 35
TABLE 18: DELAWARE WATER GAP TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND
REVENUE PROJECTIONS .................................................. 38
TABLE 19: MILFORD-MONTAGUE TOLL BRIDGE VOLUME AND
REVENUE PROJECTIONS .................................................. 41
TABLE 20: VOLUME AND REVENUE COMPARISON -- 2012 TO 2013 ........... 44
TABLE 21: ACTUAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES FOR 2012 .................. 45
TABLE 22: PROJECTED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES FOR 2013 ............ 46
TABLE 23: PROJECTED VS. ACTUAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES ......... 47
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 13A: TRENTON-MORRISVILLE TOLL VEHICLES ........................... 24
FIGURE 13B: TRENTON-MORRISVILLE TOLL TRUCKS .............................. 25
FIGURE 14A: NEW HOPE-LAMBERTVILLE TOLL VEHICLES ....................... 27
FIGURE 14B: NEW HOPE-LAMBERTVILLE TOLL TRUCKS ......................... 28
FIGURE 15A: INTERSTATE 78 TOLL VEHICLES ........................................ 30
FIGURE 15B: INTERSTATE 78 TOLL TRUCKS .......................................... 31
FIGURE 16A: EASTON-PHILLIPSBURG TOLL VEHICLES............................ 33
FIGURE 16B: EASTON-PHILLIPSBURG TOLL TRUCKS .............................. 34
FIGURE 17A: PORTLAND-COLUMBIA TOLL VEHICLES ............................. 36
FIGURE 17B: PORTLAND-COLUMBIA TOLL TRUCKS ................................ 37
FIGURE 18A: DELAWARE WATER GAP (I-80) TOLL VEHICLES ................. 39
FIGURE 18B: DELAWARE WATER GAP (I-80) TOLL TRUCKS ................... 40
FIGURE 19A: MILFORD-MONTAGUE TOLL VEHICLES ............................... 42
FIGURE 19B: MILFORD-MONTAGUE TOLL TRUCKS ................................. 43
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pennoni Associates Inc. (Pennoni) has been retained by the Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission (Commission) to determine if the projected year 2013 revenues will be sufficient to satisfy the conditions of the Commission’s Current Bond Indenture, which requires under Section 501(a) the following:
Section 501(a) of the Commission’s Bond Indenture states “The Commission covenants that at all times it will establish and maintain a schedule of tolls for vehicular traffic over the system, and will collect tolls, so that the Net Revenues in each fiscal year will at all times be at least sufficient to provide funds in an amount not less than (1) the greater of: (i) one hundred thirty percent (130%) of the Annual Debt Service for such fiscal year on account of all Applicable Long-Term Indebtedness then outstanding under the provisions of this Indenture, or (ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Applicable Long-Term Indebtedness, plus (A) the amount of required transfers from the Revenue Fund to the credit of the Reserve Maintenance Fund pursuant to the Annual Capital Budget, and (B) an amount sufficient to restore any deficiency in the Debt Service Reserve Fund within an eighteen (18) month period; plus (2) the amount of any Short-Term Indebtedness outstanding pursuant to Section 703(a)(2); plus (3) the amount of Net Revenues in excess of the sum of the amounts set forth in clauses (1) and (2), together with Other Revenues pledged to the payment of Subordinated Indebtedness, shall be sufficient to pay the Annual Debt Service for any Subordinated Indebtedness.”
Anticipated revenues for 2013 were calculated by applying the current toll structure to the projected 2013 volumes for each vehicle type on the seven (7) toll bridges under the jurisdiction of the Commission. Table 22 lists the projected revenues and expenditures for the year 2013. The sum of year 2013 projected toll bridge revenues is $118,940,555.77, the Net Revenue is $70,080,491.77, and the Annual Debt Service is $32,036,296.00. Comparing the Net Revenue to the Annual Debt Service, the Net Revenue is 219% of the Annual Debt Service (Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 2.19), which satisfies the requirements of the Commission’s Bond Indenture Section 501(a)(1).
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2
INTRODUCTION
Pennoni Associates Inc. (Pennoni) has been retained by the Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission (Commission) to project traffic volumes by vehicle type on the seven (7) toll bridges for the year 2013. The seven (7) toll bridges and 13 toll supported bridges under the jurisdiction of the Commission are listed below from south to north.
TOLL BRIDGESTOLL BRIDGESTOLL BRIDGESTOLL BRIDGES TOLLTOLLTOLLTOLL SUPPORTED BRIDGESSUPPORTED BRIDGESSUPPORTED BRIDGESSUPPORTED BRIDGES
DISTRICT ONEDISTRICT ONEDISTRICT ONEDISTRICT ONE
Trenton-Morrisville (U.S. Route 1)
New Hope-Lambertville (U.S. Route 202)
Lower Trenton
Calhoun Street
Scudder Falls (Interstate 95)
Washington Crossing
New Hope-Lambertville (Route 179)
Centre Bridge-Stockton
Lumberville–Raven Rock (Pedestrian Only)
DISTRICT TWO DISTRICT TWO DISTRICT TWO DISTRICT TWO
Interstate 78
Easton-Phillipsburg (U.S. Route 22)
Uhlerstown-Frenchtown
Upper Black Eddy-Milford
Riegelsville
Northampton Street
Riverton-Belvidere
DISTRICT THREEDISTRICT THREEDISTRICT THREEDISTRICT THREE
Portland-Columbia
Delaware Water Gap (Interstate 80)
Milford-Montague
Portland-Columbia (Pedestrian Only)
The purpose of the study is to determine if the year 2013 projected toll revenues will be sufficient to satisfy the conditions of the Commission’s current Bond Indenture, which requires under Section 501(a) the following:
Section 501(a) of the Commission’s Bond Indenture states “The Commission covenants that at all times it will establish and maintain a schedule of tolls for vehicular traffic over the system, and will collect tolls, so that the Net Revenues in each fiscal year will at all times be at least sufficient to provide funds in an amount not less than (1) the greater of: (i) one hundred thirty percent (130%) of the Annual Debt Service for such fiscal year on account of all Applicable Long-Term Indebtedness then outstanding under the provisions of this Indenture, or (ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the Maximum Annual Debt Service on all Applicable Long-Term Indebtedness, plus (A) the amount of required transfers from the Revenue Fund to the credit of the Reserve Maintenance Fund pursuant to the Annual Capital Budget, and (B) an amount sufficient to restore any deficiency in the Debt Service Reserve fund within an eighteen (18) month period; plus (2) the amount of any Short-Term Indebtedness outstanding pursuant to Section 703(a)(2); plus (3) the amount of Net Revenues in excess of the sum of the amounts set forth in clauses (1) and (2), together with Other Revenues pledged to the payment of
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3
Subordinated Indebtedness, shall be sufficient to pay the Annual Debt Service for any subordinated indebtedness.”
The year 2013 projected Net Revenue is 219% of the Annual Debt Service (Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 2.19), which satisfies the requirements of the Commission’s Bond Indenture Section 501(a)(1).
METHODOLOGY
To project traffic volumes on the toll bridges for the year 2013, the following were considered: new development projects that could add traffic to the toll bridges, roadway construction projects that could divert motorists from their regular routes, and general background growth based on historic traffic volume data crossing the bridges.
YEAR 2013 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
County planning/engineering offices for the eight (8) counties along the Delaware River within the study area (Bucks, Northampton, Monroe, and Pike counties in Pennsylvania and Mercer, Hunterdon, Warren, and Sussex counties in New Jersey) were contacted to learn of large developments which could have a major effect on toll bridge volumes during the year 2013. While several development projects are underway, only a few major projects are expected to open/expand/contract during the 2013 calendar year. For informational purposes, we have discussed major projects which may reach full build-out in the distant future but will likely not contribute any traffic during the year 2013.
District 1 (Trenton-Morrisville, New Hope-Lambertville)
In Bucks County, there are no new major developments proposed for 2013 in the area of the New Hope-Lambertville bridge. In Mercer County, Pennrose Properties will start construction on a 204-unit low-income housing development in the spring of 2013 but is not expected to impact traffic volumes in 2013. The Opus Group will expand its Mercer Corporate Center development by 100,000 square feet, which may have a slight impact on the Trenton-Morrisville bridge but is not expected to significantly increase traffic. The expansion of the Quakerbridge Mall is proceeding on a slower schedule and is not expected to impact traffic volumes in 2013. In southern Hunterdon, New Jersey, there are no new major developments proposed for 2013 in the area of the New Hope-Lambertville Toll Bridge.
District 2 (I-78, Easton-Phillipsburg)
An 8,500 seat multi-purpose arena at the intersection of 7th and Hamilton Streets in Allentown, Pennsylvania is expected to be completed by September 2014. The arena will house the Lehigh
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4
Valley Phantoms ice hockey team. The development is not expected to impact river crossing volumes until construction is completed; thus, no additional traffic crossing the toll bridges was considered. The Sands Casino, which opened a 300 room hotel in May 2011, has been granted an expansion of their games area by 20%. This expansion is not expected to impact traffic volumes in 2013. Sycamore Landing is a proposed residential development consisting of 247 units to be located on Route 22 near the Phillipsburg Mall in Phillipsburg, Warren County, New Jersey. No construction has begun as of early 2013, and construction is not expected to be completed in 2013. As such, no additional traffic crossing the toll bridges was considered. No major developments are proposed in northern Hunterdon County for 2013.
District 3 (Delaware Water Gap, Milford-Montague, Portland-Columbia)
In Pike County, the Highland Village residential development (approximately 5,300 units) is currently on hold. No impact to traffic volumes was considered. No major developments are proposed in Monroe County, Pennsylvania or Sussex County, New Jersey for 2013.
RECENT ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Pennoni coordinated with the Commission, County planning/engineering offices, and the Departments of Transportation to identify significant roadway construction projects near the bridges. In addition, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and New Jersey TIP were also reviewed. Our findings are as follows:
2012 Roadway Construction Projects
� The Riverton-Belvidere Toll Supported Bridge Water Street Improvement Project was initiated in September 2012 and was completed by October 31st, 2012. The project involved single lane restrictions and alternate side closures on Water Street. Based on the distance to alternative crossings and the volume to capacity ratio on the bridge, traffic diversions were minimal and as such, no adjustments were made.
� The Interstate 78 PA Approach Paving Improvement Project began in September 2012 and will be completed in the spring of 2013. There are no detours required but lane closures were implemented starting in September 2012 and extending through the winter of 2013. Single lane closures will be implemented as necessary with an additional travel lane being closed during overnight periods. Based on the volume to capacity ratio on the bridge, traffic diversions will be minimal and as such, no adjustments were made.
� The Broad Street Viaduct leading to the Easton-Phillipsburg Toll Bridge was repaired from August 29th through September of 2012. The project did not involve lane closures. Limited duration traffic slow-downs were conducted along Route 22 westbound for a one-hour period. Traffic diversions were minimal and as such, no adjustments were made.
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 5
� Lighting fixtures were repaired on the Delaware Water Gap (Interstate 80) Toll Bridge on September 24 through September 26, 2012. The left lanes were closed in both directions during the mid-day hours. Traffic diversions were minimal and as such, no adjustments were made.
� The New Hope-Lambertville Toll Supported Bridge was closed during the overnight hours of December 12th and 13th, 2012 to allow installation of a new overhead weight-limit sign on the bridge’s New Hope side. Traffic diversions were minimal and as such, no adjustments were made.
� The bridge replacement of S.R. 2030 (Foxtown Hill Road) over S.R. 2028 (Broad Street) will continue through 2013. In December 2010, the replacement of S.R. 2030 (Foxtown Hill Road) over S.R. 2028 (Broad Street) commenced in Smithfield Township, approximately one half mile from the Delaware Water Gap (I-80) Toll Bridge. S.R. 2030 (Foxtown Hill Road) serves as the ramp for I-80 Exit 310. During construction, traffic is expected to access the Delaware Water Gap (I-80) Toll Bridge from Exit 309 with a limited amount of traffic diverting to the Portland-Columbia Toll Bridge. Construction started in December 2010 and is anticipated to be completed in October 2013. There are currently lane restrictions on Foxtown Hill Road but no closures/detours. As such, no adjustments were made.
� The rehabilitation of the S.R. 0611 (E. Riverside Drive) Bridge over Bushkill Creek in Easton, PA is located near the intersection of S.R. 0611 and Route 22. The Easton-Phillipsburg Toll Bridge carries Route 22 over the Delaware River. Vehicles detoured during construction could utilize local roadways to access Route 22 and the Easton-Phillipsburg Toll Bridge. As such, no adjustments are made.
� The rehabilitation of the S.R. 0006 (Grand Army of the Republic Highway) Bridge over Sawkill Creek is located approximately two miles west of the Milford-Montague Toll Bridge. Traffic accessing the Milford-Montague Toll Bridge was not diverted or detoured. As such, no adjustments were made.
� S.R. 2001 is undergoing a full reconstruction between the unincorporated communities of Bushkill, in southern Pike County and Dingmans Ferry, near the privately owned and tolled Dingmans Ferry Bridge. The roughly 13.6 mile reconstruction will take place through 2020. No traffic is expected to be diverted from the Delaware Water Gap or the Milford-Montague Toll Bridges.
� The Pennsylvania Turnpike is constructing a new interchange on I-95 in Bristol. The project is in the preliminary phases of construction, with Phase 1 construction anticipated to be completed in 2014. Phase 1 of construction is not thought to have impacted any traffic patterns in 2012.
� The Delaware Road Bridge over the Delaware Canal will be replaced. During construction, a temporary structure will carry vehicles over the Delaware Canal. As such, no adjustments were made.
� The South Broad Street Bridge over Assunpink Creek in Trenton, New Jersey will be updated to a modern structure from its current stone arch structure. Detours for this construction may divert eastbound traffic from the Lower Trenton Toll Supported Bridge to the Trenton - Morrisville Toll Bridge. Construction started in 2012. Due to the availability of adjacent routes, no adjustments were made.
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 6
2012 Travel Alerts
� Lighter than normal traffic volumes were observed on all bridges from October 29th through November 4th due to Hurricane Sandy. It is estimated that the bridges lost a total of 192,682 vehicles during this period.
� The Trenton-Morrisville Toll Bridge was shut down in the Route 1 southbound direction from 11:15 am to 1:00 pm on February 16, 2012 due to an accident. It is estimated that 2,150 vehicles were diverted during this closure.
� Several road closures were implemented in Trenton on Saturday November 10, 2012 for a half-marathon. All access roads for the Lower Trenton Toll Supported Bridge were closed from 7:45 am until 9:30 am. All access roads for the Calhoun Street Bridge were closed from 7:45 am until 10:45 am. It is estimated that 4,100 passenger cars were diverted to the Trenton-Morrissville toll bridge during this closure.
� The Lumberville-Raven Rock Toll Supported bridge was closed on October 29th due to the shutdown of the Bulls Island State Park on the New Jersey side during Hurricane Sandy. The bridge is a pedestrian bridge and therefore no adjustments were made.
2013 Roadway Construction Projects
� The Easton-Philipsburg Toll Bridge Rehabilitation Project is anticipated to start in June of 2013 and extend 21 months to February 2015. Traffic impacts are expected due to planned lane closures. Vehicular traffic will be limited to one-lane in each direction during various construction phases. Local detours will be necessary during some periods in the City of Easton, where some entry and exits for Route 22 will undergo work as part of this project. It is anticipated that traffic-related impacts will be limited to 15 months of the 21 month duration. During 2013, a total of 634,688 vehicles are expected to be diverted from the Easton-Phillipsburg bridge; 423,319 will be diverted to the I-78 bridge, and the remainder will use the Northampton Street bridge.
� The New Hope-Lambertville Toll Bridge PA & NJ Approach Roadways Repaving and NJ Route 29 Overpass Bearing Seat and Bridge Paving Project is anticipated to start in June of 2013 and will continue to November 2013. There will be a two (2) week detour of the Route 202 Southbound traffic onto the adjacent Lower York Road. This should not have a significant impact on traffic volumes in 2013.
� The Interstate 78 PA Approach Paving Improvement Project began in September 2012 and will be completed in the Spring of 2013. There are no detours required but lane closures were implemented starting in September 2012 and extending through the Spring of 2013. Single lane closures will be implemented as necessary with an additional travel lane being closed during overnight periods. This project is not expected to impact any traffic patterns in 2013.
� The section of I-84 between S.R. 0006 and the New York state border is being rehabilitated and repaved. This project is unlikely to divert vehicles to the Delaware Water Gap (I-80) Toll Bridge or the Milford-Montague Toll Bridge. This project is not expected to impact any traffic patterns in 2013.
� The Pennsylvania Turnpike work on a new interchange on I-95 in Bristol, as mentioned earlier, is in the preliminary phases of construction, with Phase 1 construction anticipated to be completed in 2014. Phase 1 of construction is not expected to impact any traffic patterns in 2013.
� S.R. 2001 is undergoing a full reconstruction between the unincorporated communities of Bushkill, in southern Pike County and Dingmans Ferry, near the privately owned and tolled
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7
Dingmans Ferry Bridge. The roughly 13.6 mile reconstruction will take place through 2020. No traffic is expected to be diverted from the Delaware Water Gap or the Milford-Montague Toll Bridges.
� The Bushkill Creek bridge rehabilitation project is located approximately four miles northwest of the Easton Phillipsburg bridge and six miles northwest of the I-78 bridge. Construction is expected to begin in 2013. The previous bridge has been out of commission since 2011; thus, construction is not expected to impact any traffic patterns in 2013.
� Freemansburg Avenue over Route 33 in Northampton County, Bethlehem Township, is being reconstructed. The project site is approximately 5 miles from the Easton-Phillipsburg and I-78 bridges. Estimated project start date has yet to be determined. Thus, the project is not expected to impact traffic patterns in 2013.
� The rehabilitation of the S.R. 0006 (Grand Army of the Republic Highway) Bridge over Sawkill Creek is located approximately two miles west of the Milford-Montague Toll Bridge. Traffic accessing the Milford-Montague Toll Bridge is not expected to be diverted or detoured.
� Route 31 is undergoing pavement resurfacing from South of Rt. 78 to North of CR 634. The project, approximately 11 miles from the Easton-Phillipsburg and I-78 bridges, is not expected to impact traffic patterns in 2013.
� The nine mile-long Route 202 Parkway is under construction between Route 63 in Montgomery Township and Route 611 in Doylestown Township. This construction zone is approximately 11 miles west of the New Hope-Lambertville bridge and is not expected to impact bridge traffic patterns in 2013.
HISTORICAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Commission provided historical traffic volume information for the 11 vehicular toll supported bridges and the seven (7) toll bridges. For the purpose of this study, volumes and toll revenue data from the years 2007 to 2012 were used. Traffic volume data for the toll supported bridges is summarized on a monthly basis from 2007 to 2012, as listed in Tables 1 through 6. Where volume data was not available, traffic volumes were estimated and are shown in italics. No vehicle classification data was provided, but most toll supported bridges (with the exception on the Scudder Falls Bridge and the Upper Black Eddy-Milford Bridge) have weight restrictions prohibiting large trucks. The Scudder Falls Toll Supported Bridge carries approximately 21 million vehicles per year, which converts to an average annual daily traffic volume (AADT) of approximately 57,000 vehicles. Volumes on the Scudder Falls Bridge have remained constant for several years. The Lower Trenton, Calhoun Street, New Hope-Lambertville and Northampton Street Toll Supported Bridges generally carry approximately 4 - 8 million vehicles per year. The remaining toll supported bridges generally carry from 1.2 to 2.6 million vehicles per year. At the toll supported bridges, there were minor fluctuations in volumes year to year on most bridges, with the five (5) year trend generally less than a four (4) percent increase or decrease per year.
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8
Reviewing information from the seven (7) toll bridges under the jurisdiction of the Commission during 2012, we found that the Delaware Water Gap (Interstate 80) and Interstate 78 Toll Bridges carry the largest traffic volumes (9.1 and 11.0 million toll paying westbound vehicles per year, respectively). Easton-Phillipsburg and Trenton-Morrisville (US Route 1) carry 5.3 and 7.9 million toll paying (westbound) vehicles per year, respectively. The remaining three (3) toll bridges carry between 1.2 million and 1.9 million toll paying (westbound) vehicles per year. These figures have remained fairly consistent over the past few years, with yearly variances in growth and decline in traffic averaging between 5% and 8%. Unadjusted traffic volume data for the toll bridges is summarized from 2007 to 2012 by vehicular class, and is listed in Tables 7 through 12. The passenger vehicles represented approximately 87 percent of the vehicles on the seven (7) toll bridges during 2012. The five (5) axle tractor-trailer continues to be the most common truck type, representing approximately 8.8 percent of vehicles crossing the seven (7) toll bridges during 2012. Two (2) axle trucks represent the next largest portion of trucks at 2.2 percent. The auto / tractor trailer volume percentages have remained consistent for the past several years.
YEAR 2013 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND TOLL REVENUE PROJECTIONS
In developing traffic projections, adjustments were applied to raw traffic data to account for significant decreases or increases in traffic volumes attributable to events such as drastic weather patterns or construction detours. A total of four adjustments were applied to 2012 traffic volumes. In late October and early November of 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused a significant drop in toll traffic. Daily traffic volumes declined greater than forty percent (40%) during the last week of October and greater than twenty percent (20%) during the first week in November. It is estimated that the bridges lost a total of 192,682 vehicles during this period. The year 2012 was a leap year. An estimated total 96,129 vehicles were observed in the westbound direction on February 29, 2012 on all toll bridges. The volumes were adjusted to reflect February data without this additional day. February volumes for the Trenton-Morrisville Toll Bridge were adjusted by 2,150 vehicles to reflect a brief shutdown in the Route 1 southbound direction on February 16, 2012 due to an accident. The November volumes for the Trenton-Morrisville Toll Bridge were also adjusted to reflect a diversion of 4,100 passenger cars from the Lower Trenton Toll Supported Bridge and the Calhoun Street Bridge during road closures implemented for a half-marathon. Tables 13 through 19 summarize five (5) year traffic volumes for the seven (7) toll bridges for the years 2007 through 2012. The five (5) year trends are illustrated graphically in Figures 13A/B to 19A/B. Any adjustments due to construction projects or significant weather effects are accounted for in 2010, 2011 and 2012 traffic volumes in order to accurately illustrate growth trends. Review of the data indicates a 0.4% decrease in traffic volumes system wide from 2011 to 2012. Passenger cars decreased by 0.7%, accounting for several adjustments to 2012 volumes. All trucks increased by 1.6% system wide. Upon review of the traffic data from 2007 to 2012, the volumes on all District Three bridges and the Easton-Phillipsburg Toll Bridge reached a low point in 2012. The Trenton-Morrisville, New Hope-Lambertville, and Interstate 78 bridges reached a low point in 2008. The volumes on the Trenton-Morrisville and Interstate 78 Toll Bridges have been growing steadily since 2008. The volumes on the New Hope-Lambertville toll bridge have been declining since 2009.
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 9
Based on the findings listed above, a growth or reduction factor was applied to adjusted 2012 traffic volumes for each vehicle type on each toll bridge to project the year 2013 volumes. The growth factors that were used to project 2012 traffic volumes to 2013 traffic volumes for each vehicle type at each bridge are shown in Tables 13 through 19. Vehicles with significantly small sample sizes were projected to remain flat. Passenger car volumes are projected to increase by 0.17% system wide from 2012 to 2013 and overall truck volumes are projected to increase by 1.33%. These growth factors reflect adjusted 2012 traffic volumes. During 2013, one construction project is expected to divert motorists from their usual route. The Easton-Phillipsburg Toll Bridge Replacement Project is expected to reduce Westbound bridge volumes by 634,688 vehicles with 423,319 diverted to the I-78 Bridge and the remainder using the Northampton Street Bridge. The 2013 volume projections reflect an adjustment for this project. The following toll structures were applied to the projected 2013 volumes to determine the projected year 2013 revenue for each toll bridge:
Vehicle Type Toll Structure Cash/Casual
E-ZPass Discount E-ZPass
Passenger Vehicles $ 1.00 $ 0.60 2-Axle Trucks $ 6.50 $ 5.85 3-Axle Trucks $ 12.00 $ 10.80 4-Axle Trucks $ 16.00 $ 14.40 5-Axle Trucks $ 20.00 $ 18.00 6-Axle Trucks $ 24.00 $ 21.60 7-Axle Trucks $ 28.00 $ 25.20
Frequent or commuter E-ZPass passenger car users that have 20 or more crossings in a 35-calendar day period receive a 40% discount over the cash / casual E-ZPass fare. For trucks, the off peak traffic (9 PM – 6 AM) receives a 10% discount over the cash fare. We calculated a weighted average toll rate for each vehicle class specific to each bridge using total toll revenue and total volumes. Tables 13 through 19 show the weighted average toll rates utilized for each vehicle type on each bridge. Table 20 compares the unadjusted 2012 volumes and revenues for each bridge and maintenance district with the projected 2013 volumes and revenues. As indicated, overall toll traffic volumes are projected remain flat increasing by just 4,703 vehicles (0.01%). Revenues are projected to increase by approximately $1,391,134.32 (1.22%). The growth in overall toll traffic volumes does not reflect adjustments made to year 2012 traffic volumes and is intended to show the anticipated measured increase from 2012 to 2013. Table 21 is provided in response to Section 501(a)(1) of the Commission’s Bond Indenture and provides Total Revenue, Operating Expenses, Net Revenue and Annual Debt Service for 2012. The requirement that the Net Revenue for the preceding fiscal year be at least 130% of the Annual Debt Service (Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 1.30) was met. Table 22 lists the projected revenues and expenditures for the year 2013. The sum of year 2013 projected toll bridge revenues is $118,940,555.77, the Net Revenue is $70,080,491.77, and the Annual Debt Service is $32,036,296.00. Comparing the Net Revenue to the Annual Debt
2012 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT
YEAR 2013 TOLL BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION
PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS 10
Service, the Net Revenue is 219% of the Annual Debt Service (Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 2.19), which satisfies the requirements of the Commission’s Bond Indenture Section 501(a)(1). Table 23 provides a comparison for revenues, expenditures, and Debt Service Coverage Ratios for the 2012 projected volumes (from the 2011 Traffic Engineering Report), the actual 2012 unadjusted volumes, and the 2013 projected volumes.
Ta
ble
1 -
20
07
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Low
er T
rento
n
Cal
houn Str
eet
Scu
dder F
alls
Was
hingto
n
Cro
ssin
g
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1
Cen
tre
Bri
dge-
Sto
ckto
n
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenchto
wn U
pper B
lack
Eddy-
Milf
ord
Rie
gelsvi
lle
Nort
hampto
n
Str
eet
Riv
erto
n-
Bel
vider
e
Total
January
524,2
04
542,6
87
1,6
85,4
85
192,4
44
419,8
39
41,7
25
109,7
86
105,1
58
96,8
16
693,5
43
118,4
86
4,5
30,1
73
Febru
ary
469,3
57
473,7
26
1,5
00,6
83
171,6
80
367,1
18
37,0
41
93,8
79
91,2
27
85,6
94
605,9
55
102,0
20
3,9
98,3
80
Marc
h563,5
83
565,8
93
1,7
57,0
94
200,2
32
441,0
53
42,8
71
112,7
86
110,0
80
100,0
47
719,0
66
122,6
95
4,7
35,4
00
April
552,4
45
553,2
88
1,7
53,4
84
199,3
23
440,9
86
52,7
77
116,9
39
111,9
31
104,7
87
725,8
86
124,2
17
4,7
36,0
63
May
610,0
88
605,5
82
1,9
07,9
11
228,2
24
485,1
12
-
135,2
53
125,8
21
114,2
12
757,7
22
152,2
32
5,1
22,1
57
June
588,5
76
597,1
64
1,8
73,9
37
219,6
92
459,1
98
144,6
09
129,9
58
121,9
92
110,9
36
716,8
76
140,9
36
5,1
03,8
74
July
585,8
04
594,7
45
1,8
40,9
25
214,8
10
469,9
64
156,4
10
134,2
73
128,2
39
111,4
87
703,7
47
140,1
40
5,0
80,5
44
August
607,5
31
606,5
45
1,8
99,4
67
215,8
31
473,8
85
153,7
88
131,4
37
128,6
64
110,1
41
718,4
14
150,6
48
5,1
96,3
51
Septe
mber
560,7
32
550,1
87
1,7
57,3
70
209,3
60
449,7
73
151,5
46
124,9
88
122,2
59
104,8
53
679,0
51
145,8
80
4,8
55,9
99
Octo
ber
604,7
63
581,9
38
1,8
95,7
27
231,0
77
464,4
87
148,7
10
125,4
36
121,8
08
109,7
42
714,8
84
153,3
85
5,1
51,9
57
Novem
ber
568,9
10
535,7
95
1,7
69,6
34
208,9
35
426,2
55
132,8
09
108,6
31
111,0
20
102,4
63
686,3
64
137,4
10
4,7
88,2
26
Decem
ber
553,9
63
550,1
36
1,6
85,1
19
208,7
41
420,9
18
125,1
65
102,0
58
105,8
90
100,3
57
669,3
54
127,6
23
4,6
49,3
24
To
tal
6,7
89,9
56
6,7
57,6
86
21,3
26,8
36
2,5
00,3
49
5,3
18,5
88
1,1
87,4
51
1,4
25,4
24
1,3
84,0
89
1,2
51,5
35
8,3
90,8
62
1,6
15,6
72
57,9
48,4
48
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics a
nd a
dju
ste
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o c
ounte
r m
alfunction r
ounded
Centr
e B
ridge -
Sto
ckto
n B
ridge w
eekday c
losure
s f
or
TS
-429A
(Jan-M
ay,
Nov)
and t
he c
ount
sta
tion loo
p d
ete
cto
rs w
ere
repla
ced in M
ay
Riv
ert
on -
Belv
idere
Bridge w
eekend a
nd w
eekday c
losure
s f
or
TS
-371A
(Jan-J
uly
, O
ct-
Nov)
Incre
ase in t
raff
ic v
olu
me o
n L
ow
er
Tre
nto
n B
ridge is a
result o
f constr
uction o
n t
he T
rento
n -
Morr
isvill
e T
oll
Bridge (
T-3
80B
)
11
Ta
ble
2 -
20
08
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Lower
Tre
nton
Cal
houn S
treet
Scu
dder F
alls
Was
hingto
n Cro
ssin
g
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1
Cen
tre B
ridge
-
Stock
ton
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenc
htown
Upper
Bla
ck E
ddy-
Milf
ord
Rie
gelsv
ille
North
ampto
n Stre
et
Riv
erto
n-Bel
vider
e
Total
January
549,1
71
546,4
05
1,7
13,6
75
212,2
92
401,4
20
118,3
94
107,0
30
104,6
57
100,5
13
684,7
93
136,4
59
4,6
74,8
09
February
517,3
39
518,4
35
1,5
99,7
53
196,8
60
374,2
71
104,9
84
95,2
33
90,5
79
93,4
40
633,0
00
120,6
62
4,3
44,5
55
March
581,8
58
576,9
91
1,7
57,1
69
213,8
22
418,5
75
127,5
89
111,3
71
106,8
73
107,8
91
669,9
07
143,0
26
4,8
15,0
72
April
584,0
31
577,7
33
1,8
19,8
02
232,0
02
434,7
46
135,4
71
116,5
58
108,5
59
112,7
99
636,4
51
149,1
79
4,9
07,3
31
May
589,7
50
585,5
29
1,8
53,2
92
236,1
78
459,5
26
145,1
87
126,7
09
117,3
82
114,9
37
666,4
28
154,3
20
5,0
49,2
38
June
579,1
66
570,0
37
1,8
09,9
12
222,6
09
447,5
05
146,1
38
124,3
12
114,4
59
110,3
76
683,6
85
148,9
97
4,9
57,1
96
July
585,2
86
581,1
34
1,8
27,3
59
206,6
36
457,6
13
143,6
15
131,4
54
114,2
57
102,9
29
684,1
72
154,4
10
4,9
88,8
65
August
581,0
26
574,4
88
1,8
13,5
96
217,1
65
463,6
33
150,1
20
129,5
48
114,7
89
104,8
25
664,4
08
152,2
25
4,9
65,8
23
September
551,8
11
553,6
76
1,8
15,5
70
216,0
66
424,2
35
137,9
23
116,1
67
102,0
73
98,4
94
635,4
48
147,3
83
4,7
98,8
46
October
557,4
18
577,3
29
1,8
26,7
23
233,0
58
443,6
08
140,9
67
126,7
18
98,2
07
103,8
52
672,2
95
156,0
41
4,9
36,2
15
November
508,5
56
517,2
50
1,6
90,5
26
197,7
44
395,6
24
136,8
19
112,0
26
92,9
01
89,2
94
605,8
25
136,6
33
4,4
83,1
98
December
540,7
38
563,9
26
1,7
94,0
14
209,5
50
401,6
79
130,9
57
104,5
39
97,9
61
87,7
57
632,7
79
133,3
67
4,6
97,2
67
To
tal
6,7
26,1
50
6,7
42,9
33
21,3
21,3
90
2,5
93,9
82
5,1
22,4
35
1,6
18,1
64
1,4
01,6
65
1,2
62,6
97
1,2
27,1
08
7,8
69,1
91
1,7
32,7
02
57,6
18,4
16
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics a
nd a
dju
ste
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o c
ounte
r m
alfunction r
ounded
Incre
ase in t
raff
ic v
olu
me o
n L
ow
er
Tre
nto
n B
ridge (
January
and F
ebru
ary
) is
a r
esult o
f constr
uction o
n t
he T
rento
n -
Morr
isvill
e T
oll
Bridge (
T-3
80B
)
12
Ta
ble
3 -
20
09
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Lower
Tre
nton
Cal
houn S
treet
Scu
dder F
alls
Was
hingto
n Cro
ssin
g
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1
Cen
tre B
ridge
-
Stock
ton
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenc
htown
Upper
Bla
ck E
ddy-
Milf
ord
Rie
gelsv
ille
North
ampto
n Stre
et
Riv
erto
n-Bel
vider
e
Total
January
518,1
15
553,8
51
1,6
09,0
18
199,3
61
350,9
43
116,0
74
97,6
39
92,9
81
79,7
41
603,2
79
126,1
10
4,3
47,1
12
February
500,3
03
490,9
91
1,5
22,0
87
189,3
93
351,1
47
115,3
28
96,4
07
91,0
60
77,1
90
591,3
59
125,6
56
4,1
50,9
21
March
565,7
48
555,6
34
1,7
07,0
97
220,5
40
384,1
31
132,4
70
110,8
87
103,5
61
88,3
07
666,9
54
144,8
33
4,6
80,1
62
April
579,3
05
582,7
24
1,8
27,7
31
224,7
81
403,5
55
143,4
91
119,2
68
110,7
97
94,7
54
684,9
41
152,1
73
4,9
23,5
20
May
588,5
19
590,2
92
1,8
31,3
90
224,8
27
426,9
04
164,1
46
131,3
58
120,0
87
97,0
28
705,4
46
161,2
72
5,0
41,2
69
June
579,1
91
551,1
07
1,8
23,0
98
214,0
28
417,5
71
146,1
59
126,6
41
116,6
51
105,7
90
684,5
46
157,9
03
4,9
22,6
85
July
588,1
55
580,7
35
1,7
34,8
52
218,5
37
448,8
93
142,6
86
140,6
07
123,6
48
113,4
77
661,3
19
160,5
59
4,9
13,4
68
August
574,4
07
572,9
97
1,8
12,9
43
207,5
22
448,9
77
160,0
92
133,6
36
122,4
59
110,0
22
682,1
76
152,6
63
4,9
77,8
94
September
541,1
00
559,5
84
1,7
39,8
18
210,0
94
421,0
46
155,0
92
127,4
99
117,1
61
103,8
64
638,6
12
151,6
27
4,7
65,4
97
October
559,0
56
568,0
89
1,7
96,4
26
216,9
49
432,6
72
137,5
38
126,9
32
116,1
17
107,9
58
642,6
62
154,0
67
4,8
58,4
66
November
513,7
99
537,2
97
1,7
24,3
37
198,4
32
411,6
58
128,5
15
116,3
69
108,0
37
101,0
92
585,2
96
139,0
78
4,5
63,9
10
December
508,2
24
560,6
21
1,7
11,7
97
192,1
22
399,7
01
132,4
64
107,3
76
110,2
63
102,0
62
725,2
62
134,9
64
4,6
84,8
56
To
tal
6,6
15,9
22
6,7
03,9
22
20,8
40,5
94
2,5
16,5
86
4,8
97,1
98
1,6
74,0
55
1,4
34,6
19
1,3
32,8
22
1,1
81,2
85
7,8
71,8
52
1,7
60,9
05
56,8
29,7
60
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics a
nd a
dju
ste
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o c
ounte
r m
alfunction r
ounded
Tra
ffic
counte
rs d
ow
n t
hro
ughout
part
s o
f 2009 a
t C
alh
oun S
treet,
Scudder
Falls
, C
entr
e B
ridge-S
tockto
n,
and U
hle
rsto
wn-F
renchto
wn b
ridges.
Data
inte
rpola
ted f
rom
2008 a
nd a
vaila
ble
2009 v
olu
mes.
13
Ta
ble
4 -
20
10
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Low
er T
rento
n
Cal
houn Street1
Scu
dder F
alls
Was
hingto
n
Cro
ssin
g2,5
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1
Cen
tre
Bridge-
Sto
ckto
n
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenchto
wn U
pper B
lack
Eddy-
Milf
ord
Rie
gelsvi
lle
Nort
hampto
n
Stree
t4
Riv
erto
n-
Bel
vider
e
Total
January
505,2
16
525,7
77
1,6
22,2
22
193,6
67
386,0
56
121,2
08
108,1
85
67,8
32
100,6
02
628,2
61
132,9
97
4,3
92,0
23
Febru
ary
420,1
13
442,9
74
1,3
22,7
83
151,5
57
315,1
60
93,6
65
86,2
71
80,9
74
82,1
36
546,1
84
111,4
26
3,6
53,2
43
Marc
h540,0
38
559,3
60
1,7
84,6
40
208,0
13
420,3
93
134,8
89
122,1
00
107,5
65
106,8
59
677,6
53
149,4
59
4,8
10,9
69
April
545,7
30
545,7
24
1,7
87,2
27
215,5
26
434,5
48
151,5
96
127,7
80
111,3
32
111,9
65
635,6
33
153,7
57
4,8
20,8
18
May
643,3
78
438,2
23
1,8
48,9
46
228,8
29
464,0
86
165,5
62
139,8
25
124,2
31
111,7
42
676,6
01
161,3
99
5,0
02,8
22
June
808,5
30
-
1,8
96,5
40
230,2
80
460,7
95
158,4
09
136,2
29
123,7
78
110,2
93
658,9
75
160,3
69
4,7
44,1
98
July
809,2
76
-
1,8
58,2
77
221,8
09
470,3
31
167,5
10
144,7
80
126,8
66
112,4
37
668,4
08
162,0
45
4,7
41,7
39
August
792,4
94
-
1,9
53,8
98
54,5
54
498,0
91
165,9
66
140,5
83
123,1
30
109,4
81
662,1
40
155,5
44
4,6
55,8
81
Septe
mber
718,1
52
-
1,8
64,5
98
-
473,9
95
158,5
01
134,9
87
123,9
72
83,5
54
622,5
33
149,9
84
4,3
30,2
76
Octo
ber
547,7
04
463,8
26
1,8
54,1
18
219,3
95
460,6
05
157,6
05
134,2
42
132,0
48
61,6
68
622,3
46
159,3
86
4,8
12,9
43
Novem
ber
500,6
31
454,4
47
1,7
57,2
95
203,2
46
419,6
20
141,1
21
119,6
11
120,1
05
53,8
08
609,9
65
125,7
04
4,5
05,5
53
Decem
ber
493,7
16
463,0
59
1,6
88,5
61
185,1
36
416,1
33
135,1
55
113,5
51
111,3
40
80,2
55
654,3
90
127,8
88
4,4
69,1
84
To
tal
7,3
24,9
78
3,8
93,3
90
21,2
39,1
05
2,1
12,0
12
5,2
19,8
13
1,7
51,1
87
1,5
08,1
44
1,3
53,1
73
1,1
24,8
00
7,6
63,0
89
1,7
49,9
58
54,9
39,6
49
NO
TE
S:
Note
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics.
D
ata
inte
rpola
ted f
rom
2009 a
nd a
vaila
ble
2010 v
olu
mes.
1 C
alh
oun S
treet
TS
B c
losed f
rom
5-2
4-1
0 t
o 9
-24-1
0 f
or
rehabili
tation u
nder
Contr
act
No.
TS
-442A
. C
ounte
rs n
ot
in s
erv
ice.
2 W
ashin
gto
n C
rossin
g T
SB
clo
sed f
rom
8-9
-10 t
o 9
-24
-10 f
or
rehabili
tation u
nder
Contr
act
No.
TS
-447B
. C
ounte
rs n
ot
in s
erv
ice.
3 R
iegels
vill
e T
SB
clo
sed 8
:00 P
M F
ri 9
-17-1
0 t
o 7
:00 A
M M
on 9
-20-1
0 u
nder
Contr
act
No.
TS
-445A
. C
ounte
rs n
ot
in s
erv
ice.
4 N
ort
ham
pto
n S
treet
TS
B c
ounte
r dow
n 1
2-2
2-1
0 t
o 1
2-3
1-1
0.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
5 W
ashin
gto
n C
rossin
g T
SB
counte
r dow
n 1
2-1
-10 t
o 1
2-2
2-1
0.
2009 d
ata
inte
rpola
ted a
nd d
ecre
ased b
y 1
%.
14
Ta
ble
5 -
20
11
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Lower
Tre
nton
Cal
houn Street
Scu
dder F
alls
Was
hingto
n
Cro
ssin
g2
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1
Cen
tre
Bridge-
Sto
ckto
n
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenchto
wn U
pper B
lack
Eddy-
Milf
ordRie
gelsvi
lle
Nort
hampto
n
Stree
t
Riv
erto
n-Bel
vider
e
Total
January
454,2
07
423,9
44
1,5
19,7
42
190,7
50
367,1
51
107,3
82
134,9
96
32,1
13
83,6
59
543,4
66
114,4
64
3,9
71,8
74
Febru
ary
452,8
95
414,8
58
1,5
18,0
49
182,3
67
356,7
96
111,8
98
145,6
51
-
84,0
20
526,1
98
109,2
48
3,9
01,9
80
Marc
h521,2
86
502,3
80
1,7
87,6
02
223,7
17
432,6
76
138,2
40
172,1
62
-
103,6
01
626,1
65
136,4
82
4,6
44,3
11
April
508,5
11
496,7
77
1,7
70,9
25
221,1
67
439,6
02
143,1
41
177,1
87
-
105,2
98
624,6
76
135,1
63
4,6
22,4
47
May
527,9
12
519,6
01
1,8
31,8
06
234,4
76
470,0
55
157,2
69
166,9
07
37,1
09
104,7
11
632,5
16
140,6
25
4,8
22,9
87
June
525,3
60
522,7
41
1,8
55,8
75
240,1
78
472,9
79
160,9
62
138,0
74
107,5
77
104,8
81
619,1
99
143,0
58
4,8
90,8
84
July
553,3
12
526,0
05
1,7
35,3
86
228,5
56
489,7
85
171,1
87
151,7
53
113,0
69
110,4
86
638,8
16
144,8
80
4,8
63,2
35
August
494,0
56
517,4
11
1,7
97,8
36
226,7
96
417,6
78
144,0
17
137,8
23
104,8
03
106,9
93
628,2
42
140,1
03
4,7
15,7
58
Septe
mber
495,1
72
494,0
16
1,7
74,7
37
215,3
25
430,6
45
115,3
10
114,4
30
107,1
39
97,4
15
579,8
30
123,9
82
4,5
48,0
01
Octo
ber
506,2
89
511,9
46
1,8
36,0
21
220,5
39
472,0
71
132,6
39
129,1
59
104,6
44
106,2
38
615,2
44
125,1
18
4,7
59,9
08
Novem
ber
478,6
16
488,8
35
1,7
85,8
93
191,2
78
431,1
99
127,1
40
117,0
83
98,2
24
97,8
99
593,3
69
121,9
15
4,5
31,4
51
Decem
ber
494,7
14
512,6
59
1,7
77,7
59
204,1
48
434,0
23
141,4
98
116,9
04
101,4
96
101,1
23
628,5
57
127,2
14
4,6
40,0
95
To
tal
6,0
12,3
30
5,9
31,1
73
20,9
91,6
31
2,5
79,2
97
5,2
14,6
60
1,6
50,6
83
1,7
02,1
29
806,1
74
1,2
06,3
24
7,2
56,2
78
1,5
62,2
52
54,9
12,9
31
Note
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics.
D
ata
inte
rpola
ted f
rom
2010 a
nd a
vaila
ble
2011 v
olu
mes.
1 L
ow
er
Tre
nto
n T
SB
and C
entr
e B
ridge-S
tockto
n T
SB
clo
sed 8
-28-1
1 a
nd 8
-29-1
1 d
ue t
o T
ropic
al S
torm
Ire
ne.
2 W
ashin
gto
n C
rossin
g T
SB
counte
rs d
ow
n 9
-1-1
1 t
o 9
-30-1
1. A
ugust
2011 d
ata
inte
rpola
ted.
3 R
educed t
raff
ic d
ue t
o f
loodin
g 9
-8-1
1 a
nd 9
-9-1
1.
4 U
pper
Bla
ck E
ddy T
SB
clo
sed f
rom
1-1
1-1
1 t
o 5
-20-1
1 f
or
rehabili
tation u
nder
Contr
act
N0.
TS
-444A
. C
ounte
rs n
ot
in s
erv
ice.
5 R
iegels
vill
e T
SB
counte
rs d
ow
n 1
0-2
9-1
1 t
o 1
0-3
1-1
1.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
6 N
ew
Hope-L
am
bert
vill
e T
SB
counte
rs d
ow
n f
rom
12-1
-11 t
o 1
2-3
1-1
1.
2010 d
ata
incre
ased b
y 4
%.
7 U
pper
Bla
ck E
ddy-M
ilford
TS
B c
ounte
r dow
n 1
2-1
3-1
1 t
o 1
2-1
9-1
1.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
15
Ta
ble
6 -
20
12
To
ll S
up
po
rted
Bri
dg
e V
olu
mes
Month
Lower
Trento
n5,6,7
,8,1
1
Cal
houn Street5,1
1
Scu
dder F
alls11
Was
hingto
n
Cro
ssin
g11
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e1,2,3
,4,9
,
11Cen
tre
Bridge-
Sto
ckto
n9,11
Uhle
rsto
wn-
Frenchto
wn9,1
1 Upper
Bla
ck Eddy-
Milf
ord11
Rie
gelsvi
lle11
Nort
hampto
n
Stree
t11
Riv
erto
n-
Bel
vider
e10,11
Total
January
474,8
69
481,3
71
1,6
98,1
91
197,6
94
394,433
126,7
75
111,2
45
97,2
24
92,5
91
597,2
56
120,9
15
4,3
92,5
63
Febru
ary
466,2
63
457,6
80
1,6
62,2
40
192,1
57
385,3
48
123,1
73
108,2
28
91,7
59
89,5
00
585,2
64
121,7
51
4,2
83,3
63
Marc
h516,8
32
528,1
84
1,8
31,7
77
216,1
54
427,0
93
143,3
01
12
4,5
44
106,8
24
101,6
60
653,3
00
137,2
45
4,7
86,9
14
April
495,4
41
508,9
70
1,8
13,5
83
219,1
37
429,2
74
146,9
49
12
1,2
62
109,1
51
102,0
18
632,2
93
133,4
59
4,7
11,5
37
May
522,7
24
540,7
87
1,8
98,7
27
244,1
75
463,1
96
161,3
20
134,2
37
107,6
48
107,8
94
650,0
28
140,7
96
4,9
71,5
32
June
506,0
54
524,0
78
1,8
62,4
40
232,7
52
468,8
11
163,7
58
134
,921
115,8
64
103,8
19
632,5
05
139,4
70
4,8
84,4
72
July
491,7
09
540,3
39
1,8
18,4
35
225,1
67
471,8
01
165,5
25
140
,495
126,1
31
107,1
11
627,7
71
137,8
95
4,8
52,3
79
August
507,0
63
540,0
75
1,8
75,6
34
232,3
34
468,3
35
161,4
90
138,0
14
113,5
00
106,8
28
636,2
25
138,7
04
4,9
18,2
02
Septe
mber
474,7
31
507,8
68
1,7
33,3
90
216,3
14
442,1
48
153,1
66
126,4
19
114,7
32
100,5
00
599,8
45
132,4
86
4,6
01,5
98
Octo
ber
480,7
82
504,9
80
1,8
87,1
84
212,7
49
452,0
91
155,2
71
121,6
41
105,9
70
106,6
14
602,5
58
127,4
38
4,7
57,2
77
Novem
ber
460,1
45
485,2
39
1,7
47,7
97
192,5
80
411,4
66
123,1
36
106,9
28
95,1
58
96,4
35
573,6
68
121,9
90
4,4
14,5
41
Decem
ber
473,3
03
504,3
48
1,6
98,9
04
196,1
79
430,0
50
133,0
45
111,3
00
92,1
02
100,3
65
587,1
14
124,5
20
4,4
51,2
30
To
tal
5,8
69,9
17
6,1
23,9
19
21,5
28,3
02
2,5
77,3
92
5,2
44,0
46
1,7
56
,909
1,4
79,2
34
1,2
76,0
62
1,2
15,3
35
7,3
77,8
27
1,5
76,6
69
56
,025,6
10
2.
Counte
r dow
n 2
-1-1
2 t
o 2
-29-1
2.
2011 d
ata
incre
ased b
y 3
.4%
.
1.
Counte
rs d
ow
n 1
-1-1
2 t
o 1
-31-1
2.
Jan.
2011 d
ata
inte
rpola
ted &
incre
ased b
y 6
.8%
.
Note
:
There
were
29 d
ays in F
eb.
2012
3.
Counte
r dow
n 3
-1-1
2 t
o 3
-31-1
2.
2011 d
ata
decre
ased b
y 2
.2 %
.
4.
Counte
r dow
n 4
-1-1
2 t
o 4
-8-1
2.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
5.
Counte
r dow
n 6
-1-1
2 t
o 6
-30-1
2.
May 2
012 d
ata
inte
rpola
ted.
6.
Counte
r dow
n 7
-1-1
2 t
o 7
-12-1
2.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
7.
Counte
r dow
n 8
-10-1
2 t
o 8
-20-1
2.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
8.
Counte
r dow
n 9
-27-1
2 t
o 9
-30-1
2.
Data
inte
rpola
ted.
9.
Reduced t
raff
ic d
ue t
o r
iver
floodin
g 9
-8-1
1 a
nd
/or
9-9
-11.
11.
Hurr
ucane S
andy 1
0-2
9-1
2 t
o 1
0-3
1-1
2.
10.C
ounte
r dow
n 1
0-1
-12 t
o 1
0-3
1-1
2 .
S
ept.
2012 d
ata
inte
rpola
ted
16
Ta
ble
7 -
20
07
Toll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Month
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
6,3
96,0
32
1,8
94,5
91
7,8
21,4
89
5,7
42,5
13
1,3
65,1
95
8,5
01,0
39
1,3
10,0
47
33,0
30,9
06
2-a
xle
tru
ck
176,3
80
57,4
25
235,2
04
164,8
59
30,7
72
162,9
71
26,1
71
853,7
82
3-a
xle
tru
ck
83,1
43
28,5
69
106,9
16
59,5
99
12,3
64
96,3
80
4,5
45
391,5
16
4-a
xle
tru
ck
61,8
61
7,6
14
124,7
99
60,4
00
7,9
80
67,8
28
2,0
11
332,4
93
5-a
xle
tru
ck
178,5
66
28,4
73
1,8
77,9
51
210,0
38
33,4
80
1,1
75,5
07
8,9
21
3,5
12,9
36
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,4
93
964
42,8
08
3,3
51
475
23,6
63
85
72,8
39
7-a
xle
tru
ck
39
50
1,1
23
113
9
1,1
04
11
2,4
49
specia
l perm
it-
-
9
-
-
38
-
47
To
tal
6,8
97,5
14
2,0
17,6
86
10,2
10,2
99
6,2
40,8
73
1,4
50,2
75
10,0
28,5
30
1,3
51,7
91
38,1
96,9
68
17
Ta
ble
8 -
20
08
Toll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Month
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
6,1
07,5
45
1,7
58,9
49
7,5
59,1
87
5,9
25,2
10
1,2
74,6
54
8,2
90,9
64
1,2
65,7
73
32,1
82,2
82
2-a
xle
tru
ck
175,1
25
55,2
34
230,3
45
159,8
93
29,2
50
153,8
27
26,6
92
830,3
66
3-a
xle
tru
ck
85,3
60
24,0
51
103,5
99
61,5
63
12,8
87
92,1
37
4,4
86
384,0
83
4-a
xle
tru
ck
65,4
17
6,6
69
116,0
43
60,3
17
8,7
91
62,4
97
1,5
69
321,3
03
5-a
xle
tru
ck
171,4
32
25,3
91
1,8
31,4
67
215,9
92
32,3
06
1,0
90,0
89
8,9
17
3,3
75,5
94
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,7
76
749
49,3
71
3,0
55
295
24,6
37
129
80,0
12
7-a
xle
tru
ck
33
23
1,3
79
71
12
1,0
36
8
2,5
62
specia
l perm
it-
1
8
-
-
49
-
58
To
tal
6,6
06,6
88
1,8
71,0
67
9,8
91,3
99
6,4
26,1
01
1,3
58,1
95
9,7
15,2
36
1,3
07,5
74
37,1
76,2
60
Estim
ate
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o a
dju
stm
ents
show
n in ita
lics a
nd a
dju
ste
d f
igure
s d
ue t
o c
ounte
r m
alfunction r
ounded
Incre
ase in t
raff
ic v
olu
me o
n L
ow
er
Tre
nto
n B
ridge (
January
and F
ebru
ary
) is
a r
esult o
f constr
uction o
n t
he T
rento
n -
Morr
isville
Toll B
ridge (
T-3
80B
)
18
Ta
ble
9 -
20
09
Toll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Month
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
6,2
95,5
06
1,8
53,2
11
7,7
91,3
97
5,7
55,0
12
1,2
42,9
32
8,3
89,7
65
1,2
57,9
79
32,5
85,8
02
2-a
xle
tru
ck
168,8
65
57,0
87
216,7
45
146,4
89
28,8
57
146,3
66
22,4
66
786,8
75
3-a
xle
tru
ck
65,9
94
19,7
05
94,0
12
48,2
70
9,1
32
85,8
01
3,6
45
326,5
59
4-a
xle
tru
ck
49,5
57
5,6
45
105,4
85
54,8
77
9,4
03
49,7
96
1,4
75
276,2
38
5-a
xle
tru
ck
144,8
68
25,8
43
1,7
37,7
39
207,3
13
29,1
59
1,0
26,8
29
7,4
66
3,1
79,2
17
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,5
31
540
45,0
27
2,4
25
255
20,9
28
93
70,7
99
7-a
xle
tru
ck
27
42
1,1
95
61
45
736
8
2,1
14
specia
l perm
it-
-
10
-
-
32
-
42
To
tal
6,7
26,3
48
1,9
62,0
73
9,9
91,6
10
6,2
14,4
47
1,3
19,7
83
9,7
20,2
53
1,2
93,1
32
37,2
27,6
46
19
Ta
ble
10
- 2
01
0 T
oll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Month
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
7,3
71,9
84
1,8
21,9
12
7,9
91,8
87
5,8
04,7
69
1,3
25,9
85
8,2
86,1
85
1,2
73,7
66
33,8
76,4
88
2-a
xle
tru
ck
193,4
15
55,4
12
212,6
63
149,5
37
29,7
53
150,5
26
22,2
85
813,5
91
3-a
xle
tru
ck
72,8
59
19,3
44
98,7
74
47,2
22
11,0
88
90,0
65
3,2
23
342,5
75
4-a
xle
tru
ck
57,3
80
7,3
72
124,0
14
36,9
86
11,7
69
51,6
05
1,5
54
290,6
80
5-a
xle
tru
ck
160,1
72
25,6
37
1,7
93,7
66
184,5
22
32,0
33
1,0
18,1
00
6,8
89
3,2
21,1
19
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,6
97
589
47,6
25
2,3
79
331
26,3
19
83
79,0
23
7-a
xle
tru
ck
30
45
2,7
22
45
11
856
8
3,7
17
specia
l perm
it-
-
6
-
-
34
-
40
To
tal
7,8
57,5
37
1,9
30,3
11
10,2
71,4
57
6,2
25,4
60
1,4
10,9
70
9,6
23,6
90
1,3
07,8
08
38,6
27,2
33
20
Ta
ble
11
- 2
01
1 T
oll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Cla
ss
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
7,2
97,8
67
1,8
08,6
33
8,2
79,6
87
5,3
46,2
29
1,2
87,5
40
7,9
19,9
43
1,2
14,0
86
33,1
53,9
85
2-a
xle
tru
ck
199,9
49
57,1
04
231,0
71
141,9
94
27,9
59
143,2
66
21,0
84
822,4
27
3-a
xle
tru
ck
69,6
32
18,7
64
114,0
82
46,0
92
11,6
76
92,4
00
3,5
11
356,1
57
4-a
xle
tru
ck
57,1
71
7,8
19
132,3
17
34,9
20
13,0
88
59,4
47
1,8
21
306,5
83
5-a
xle
tru
ck
185,5
98
26,5
62
1,8
82,1
16
159,3
28
31,0
01
964,0
13
6,9
21
3,2
55,5
39
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,2
98
648
50,7
61
2,0
02
503
26,6
14
65
81,8
91
7-a
xle
tru
ck
47
41
5,2
10
55
11
1,5
85
7
6,9
56
specia
l perm
it-
-
10
3
-
25
1
39
To
tal
7,8
11,5
62
1,9
19,5
71
10,6
95,2
54
5,7
30,6
23
1,3
71,7
78
9,2
07,2
93
1,2
47,4
96
37,9
83,5
77
21
Ta
ble
12
- 2
01
2 T
oll
Brid
ge V
olu
mes
Cla
ss
Trento
n- Morr
isvi
lle
New
Hope-
Lamber
tvill
e
Inte
rsta
te 7
8
Eas
ton-
Phill
ipsb
urg
Port
land-
Colu
mbi
a
Del
awar
e W
ater
Gap
(I-8
0)
Milf
ord-M
ontague
Total
Passenger
Car
7,4
23,7
33
1,7
72,7
89
8,5
16,4
02
5,0
08,6
15
1,2
12,2
85
7,8
11,5
28
1,1
78,2
89
32,9
23,6
41
2-a
xle
tru
ck
202,0
73
56,3
13
237,0
75
134,7
25
26,3
70
140,0
92
20,0
52
816,7
00
3-a
xle
tru
ck
64,6
20
18,4
97
124,0
13
39,8
26
14,9
19
90,8
47
3,3
14
356,0
36
4-a
xle
tru
ck
59,4
55
8,2
79
136,6
07
31,8
32
9,9
31
62,6
79
1,8
28
310,6
11
5-a
xle
tru
ck
182,3
76
28,5
52
1,9
68,6
50
129,7
56
29,7
26
981,1
39
7,0
51
3,3
27,2
50
6-a
xle
tru
ck
1,9
58
549
57,1
56
1,4
32
692
27,9
84
65
89,8
36
7-a
xle
tru
ck
35
47
6,1
61
41
-
1,5
70
16
7,8
70
specia
l perm
it-
-
6
3
-
12
-
21
To
tal
7,9
34,2
50
1,8
85,0
26
11,0
46,0
70
5,3
46,2
30
1,2
93,9
23
9,1
15,8
51
1,2
10,6
15
37,8
31,9
65
22
Ta
ble
13
: T
ren
ton
-Mo
rris
vil
le T
oll
Bri
dg
e V
olu
me
an
d R
even
ue
Pro
ject
ion
s
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
1 -
passenger
car
6,3
96,0
32
6,1
07,5
45
6,2
95,5
06
6,7
22,9
60.8
7
7,3
29,8
45
7,4
39,5
07
1.0
23
7,6
10,6
16
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
176,3
80
175,1
25
168,8
65
195,2
88.1
5
200,8
52
202,6
62
1.0
22
207,1
21
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
83,1
43
85,3
60
65,9
94
73,7
42
69,9
41
64,8
35
0.9
50
61,5
94
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
61,8
61
65,4
17
49,5
57
58,3
40
57,4
56
59,6
46
1.0
02
59,7
65
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
178,5
66
171,4
32
144,8
68
163,3
09
186,3
18
182,8
98
1.0
28
188,0
19
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
1,4
93
1,7
76
1,5
31
1,7
19
1,3
52
1,9
66
1.0
50
2,0
65
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
39
33
27
31
50
35
1.0
00
35
8 -
specia
l perm
it-
-
-
-
-
-
--
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
6,8
97,5
14
6,6
06,6
88
6,7
26,3
48
7,2
15,3
90
7,8
45,8
14
7,9
51,5
50
1.0
22
8,1
29,2
15
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent, adju
stm
ent fo
r 2-1
6 bridge c
losure
, adju
stm
ent fo
r 11-1
0 M
ara
thon, and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
7,4
23,7
33
7,2
16,9
67.6
0$
0.9
7$
7,6
10,6
16
7,3
98,6
45.5
5$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
202,0
73
1,3
05,4
42.4
5$
6.4
6$
207,1
21
1,3
38,0
53.8
0$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
64,6
20
770,7
45.7
5$
11.9
3$
61,5
94
734,6
53.5
7$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
59,4
55
936,0
48.0
0$
15.7
4$
59,7
65
940,9
28.5
8$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
182,3
76
3,5
84,9
28.0
0$
19.6
6$
188,0
19
3,6
95,8
51.3
1$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
1,9
58
46,1
04.0
0$
23.5
5$
2,0
65
48,6
23.4
7$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
35
986.4
0$
28.1
8$
35
986.4
0$
8 -
specia
l perm
it0
-$
Varies
0-
$
To
tals
8,1
29
,21
5$
14
,15
7,7
42
.67
1720,0
00 p
assenger
cars
rem
oved a
s a
result o
f div
ers
ion fro
m the C
alh
oun S
treet T
oll
Support
ed B
ridge; adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
23
5,0
00
,00
0
5,5
00
,00
0
6,0
00
,00
0
6,5
00
,00
0
7,0
00
,00
0
7,5
00
,00
0
8,0
00
,00
0
8,5
00
,00
0 20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
13
A:
Tre
nto
n-M
orr
isv
ille
TB
To
ll V
eh
icle
s
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
24
20
,00
0
12
0,0
00
22
0,0
00
32
0,0
00
42
0,0
00
52
0,0
00
62
0,0
00
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
13
B:
Tre
nto
n-M
orr
isv
ille
TB
To
ll T
ruck
s
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
25
Ta
ble
14
: N
ew H
op
e-L
am
ber
tvil
le T
oll
Bri
dg
e V
olu
me
an
d R
even
ue
Pro
ject
ion
s
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
1 -
passenger
car
1,8
94,5
91
1,7
58,9
49
1,8
53,2
11
1,8
45,5
50
1,8
21,1
72
1,7
77,7
79
0.9
81
1,7
44,0
02
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
57,4
25
55,2
34
57,0
87
55,7
49
57,1
88
56,4
89
1.0
00
56,4
89
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
28,5
69
24,0
51
19,7
05
19,7
58
18,8
68
18,5
35
0.9
80
18,1
64
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
7,6
14
6,6
69
5,6
45
7,3
74
7,8
30
8,2
99
1.0
50
8,7
14
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
28,4
73
25,3
91
25,8
43
25,9
22
26,6
71
28,6
46
1.0
03
28,7
32
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
964
749
540
608
649
551
1.0
00
551
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
50
23
42
45
42
47
1.0
00
47
8 -
specia
l perm
it-
1
-
-
-
-
1.0
00
-
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
2,0
17,6
86
1,8
71,0
67
1,9
62,0
73
1,9
55,0
04
1,9
32,4
21
1,8
90,3
47
0.9
82
1,8
56,6
99
1R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
1,7
72,7
89
1,7
05,7
62.8
0$
0.9
6$
1,7
44,0
02
1,6
78,0
64.1
9$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
56,3
13
364,3
78.9
5$
6.4
7$
56,4
89
365,5
17.7
8$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
18,4
97
220,4
05.2
0$
11.9
2$
18,1
64
216,4
37.2
6$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
8,2
79
128,9
47.2
0$
15.5
8$
8,7
14
135,7
22.4
2$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
28,5
52
561,8
98.0
0$
19.6
8$
28,7
32
565,4
40.3
7$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
549
13,0
78.4
0$
23.8
2$
551
13,1
26.0
4$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
47
1,3
62.4
0$
28.9
9$
47
1,3
62.4
0$
8 -
specia
l perm
it0
-$
Varies
0-
$
To
tals
1,8
56
,69
92
,97
5,6
70
.46
$
26
1,7
00
,00
0
1,7
50
,00
0
1,8
00
,00
0
1,8
50
,00
0
1,9
00
,00
0
1,9
50
,00
0
2,0
00
,00
0
2,0
50
,00
0 20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
14
A:
Ne
w H
op
e-L
am
be
rtv
ille
TB
To
ll V
eh
icle
s
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
27
20
,00
0
40
,00
0
60
,00
0
80
,00
0
10
0,0
00
12
0,0
00
14
0,0
00
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
14
B:
Ne
w H
op
e-L
am
be
rtv
ille
TB
To
ll T
ruck
s
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
28
Ta
ble
15
: In
ters
tate
78
To
ll B
rid
ge
Vo
lum
e a
nd
Rev
enu
e P
roje
ctio
ns
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
Tra
ffic
Div
erte
d
from
Ea
ston
-
Ph
illi
psb
urg
Toll
Brid
ge
4
1 -
passenger
car
7,8
21,4
89
7,5
59,1
87
7,7
91,3
97
8,0
87,6
32
8,2
19,4
45
8,5
38,7
08
1.0
28
8,7
77,7
92
321,4
37
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
235,2
04
230,3
45
216,7
45
214,1
42
232,6
77
237,7
61
1.0
30
244,8
94
43,2
43
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
106,9
16
103,5
99
94,0
12
99,9
74
114,8
03
124,4
17
1.0
50
130,6
37
12,2
52
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
124,7
99
116,0
43
105,4
85
125,5
31
133,1
80
137,0
04
1.0
50
143,8
54
9,4
86
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
1,8
77,9
51
1,8
31,4
67
1,7
37,7
39
1,7
95,8
27
1,8
95,4
48
1,9
73,8
64
1.0
43
2,0
58,7
40
36,4
85
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
42,8
08
49,3
71
45,0
27
48,3
31
51,1
12
57,3
08
1.0
80
61,8
93
403
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
1,1
23
1,3
79
1,1
95
2,8
16
5,2
37
6,1
78
1.0
80
6,6
72
13
8 -
specia
l perm
it9
8
10
6
11
6
1.0
00
6
1
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
10,2
10,2
99
9,8
91,3
99
9,9
91,6
10
10,3
74,2
59
10,6
51,9
12
11,0
75,2
47
1.0
32
11,4
24,4
88
423,3
19
1R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 2115,0
00 p
assenger
cars
rem
oved a
s a
result o
f div
ers
ion fro
m the U
pper
Bla
ck E
ddy-
Milf
ord
Toll
Support
ed B
ridge fro
m J
anuary
2011 to M
ay
2011; adju
stm
ent fo
r
sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
.3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
4D
ivers
ion d
ue to b
ridge r
ehabili
tation p
roje
ct begin
nin
g in J
une, 2013.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
8,5
16,4
02
8,3
23,5
41.6
6$
0.9
8$
9,0
99,2
29
8,8
93,1
70.2
6$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
237,0
75
1,5
26,6
53.0
5$
6.4
4$
288,1
37
1,8
55,4
67.8
1$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
124,0
13
1,4
62,7
74.8
0$
11.8
0$
142,8
89
1,6
85,4
22.4
7$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
136,6
07
2,1
16,2
76.8
0$
15.4
9$
153,3
40
2,3
75,4
97.3
5$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
1,9
68,6
50
38,5
87,0
43.0
0$
19.6
0$
2,0
95,2
25
41,0
68,0
05.7
2$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
57,1
56
1,3
24,4
04.0
0$
23.1
7$
62,2
96
1,4
43,4
97.4
8$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
6,1
61
170,3
43.2
0$
27.6
5$
6,6
85
184,8
27.4
9$
8 -
specia
l perm
it6
300.8
0$
Varies
7-
$
To
tals
11
,84
7,8
07
57
,50
5,8
88
.58
$
7,0
00
,00
0
7,5
00
,00
0
8,0
00
,00
0
8,5
00
,00
0
9,0
00
,00
0
9,5
00
,00
0
10
,00
0,0
00
10
,50
0,0
00
11
,00
0,0
00
11
,50
0,0
00 2
00
72
00
82
00
92
01
02
01
12
01
22
01
3
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
15
A:
Inte
rsta
te 7
8 T
B T
oll
Ve
hic
les
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
30
0
50
0,0
00
1,0
00
,00
0
1,5
00
,00
0
2,0
00
,00
0
2,5
00
,00
0
3,0
00
,00
0
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
15
B:
Inte
rsta
te 7
8 T
B T
oll
Tru
cks
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
31
Ta
ble
16
: E
ast
on
-Ph
illi
psb
urg
To
ll B
rid
ge
Vo
lum
e a
nd
Rev
enu
e P
roje
ctio
ns
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
Tra
ffic
Div
erte
d t
o
I-7
8 T
oll
Brid
ge a
nd
North
am
pto
n S
treet
Brid
ge
4
1 -
passenger
car
5,7
42,5
13
5,9
25,2
10
5,7
55,0
12
5,8
62,3
90
5,3
84,3
02
5,0
20,8
86
0.9
70
4,8
70,2
60
(532,8
06)
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
164,8
59
159,8
93
146,4
89
151,3
76
142,1
00
135,0
92
0.9
70
131,0
39
(43,2
43)
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
59,5
99
61,5
63
48,2
70
48,0
22
46,2
25
39,9
22
0.9
30
37,1
27
(12,2
52)
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
60,4
00
60,3
17
54,8
77
39,8
80
35,5
48
31,9
38
0.9
00
28,7
45
(9,4
86)
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
210,0
38
215,9
92
207,3
13
187,8
80
164,4
86
130,0
70
0.8
50
110,5
60
(36,4
85)
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
3,3
51
3,0
55
2,4
25
2,4
00
2,1
49
1,4
35
0.8
50
1,2
20
(403)
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
113
71
61
45
57
41
0.9
40
39
(13)
8 -
specia
l perm
it-
-
-
-
-
3
1.0
00
3
(1)
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
6,2
40,8
73
6,4
26,1
01
6,2
14,4
47
6,2
91,9
93
5,7
74,8
68
5,3
59,3
87
0.9
66
5,1
78,9
93
(634,6
88)
1R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
4D
ivers
ion d
ue to b
ridge r
ehabili
tation p
roje
ct begin
nin
g in J
une, 2013.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
5,0
08,6
15
4,8
48,5
47.5
4$
0.9
7$
4,3
37,4
54
4,1
98,8
35.3
6$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
134,7
25
870,7
36.7
5$
6.4
6$
87,7
96
567,4
32.3
0$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
39,8
26
471,7
66.8
0$
11.8
5$
24,8
75
294,6
62.8
2$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
31,8
32
500,6
89.6
0$
15.7
3$
19,2
59
302,9
29.6
3$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
129,7
56
2,5
51,1
30.7
5$
19.6
6$
74,0
75
1,4
56,3
91.3
8$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
1,4
32
33,7
51.2
0$
23.5
7$
817
19,2
65.5
2$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
41
1,2
03.6
0$
29.3
6$
26
767.0
7$
8 -
specia
l perm
it3
-$
Varies
0-
$
To
tals
4,5
44
,30
36
,84
0,2
84
.10
$
32
4,8
00
,00
0
5,0
00
,00
0
5,2
00
,00
0
5,4
00
,00
0
5,6
00
,00
0
5,8
00
,00
0
6,0
00
,00
0
6,2
00
,00
0
6,4
00
,00
0
6,6
00
,00
0 20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
16
A:
Ea
sto
n-P
hil
lip
sbu
rg T
B T
oll
Ve
hic
les
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
33
10
0,0
00
15
0,0
00
20
0,0
00
25
0,0
00
30
0,0
00
35
0,0
00
40
0,0
00
45
0,0
00
50
0,0
00
55
0,0
00
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
16
B:
Ea
sto
n-P
hil
lip
sbu
rg T
B T
oll
Tru
cks
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
34
Ta
ble
17
: P
ort
lan
d-C
olu
mb
ia T
oll
Bri
dg
e V
olu
me
an
d R
even
ue
Pro
ject
ion
s
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
1 -
passenger
car
1,3
65,1
95
1,2
74,6
54
1,2
42,9
32
1,2
91,2
43
1,2
85,3
32
1,2
15,3
66
1.0
00
1,2
15,3
66
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
30,7
72
29,2
50
28,8
57
29,9
64
27,9
11
26,4
49
1.0
00
26,4
49
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
12,3
64
12,8
87
9,1
32
11,1
39
11,6
64
14,9
62
0.8
70
13,0
17
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
7,9
80
8,7
91
9,4
03
11,7
88
13,2
33
9,9
53
1.2
00
11,9
44
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
33,4
80
32,3
06
29,1
59
32,5
33
30,9
63
29,7
97
0.9
90
29,4
99
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
475
295
255
331
502
695
1.2
00
834
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
9
12
45
11
11
-
1.0
00
-
8 -
specia
l perm
it-
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
00
-
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
1,4
50,2
75
1,3
58,1
95
1,3
19,7
83
1,3
77,0
10
1,3
69,6
17
1,2
97,2
22
1.0
0
1,2
97,1
09
150,0
00 p
assenger
cars
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
1,2
12,2
85
1,1
73,1
69.0
1$
0.9
7$
1,2
15,3
66
1,1
76,1
50.6
0$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
26,3
70
170,8
69.4
0$
6.4
8$
26,4
49
171,3
81.3
0$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
14,9
19
178,2
10.8
0$
11.9
5$
13,0
17
155,4
90.9
8$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
9,9
31
158,4
46.4
0$
15.9
5$
11,9
44
190,5
63.2
7$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
29,7
26
589,4
90.0
0$
19.8
3$
29,4
99
584,9
88.4
1$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
692
16,5
84.0
0$
23.9
7$
834
19,9
87.0
8$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
0-
$
-0
-$
8 -
specia
l perm
it0
-$
Varies
0-
$
To
tals
1,2
97
,10
92
,29
8,5
61
.63
$
2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
35
1,2
00
,00
0
1,2
50
,00
0
1,3
00
,00
0
1,3
50
,00
0
1,4
00
,00
0
1,4
50
,00
0
1,5
00
,00
0 20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
17
A:
Po
rtla
nd
-Co
lum
bia
TB
To
ll V
eh
icle
s
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
36
20
,00
0
30
,00
0
40
,00
0
50
,00
0
60
,00
0
70
,00
0
80
,00
0
90
,00
0
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
17
B:
Po
rtla
nd
-Co
lum
bia
TB
To
ll T
ruck
s
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
37
Ta
ble
18
: D
ela
wa
re W
ate
r G
ap
(In
ters
tate
80
) T
oll
Bri
dg
e V
olu
me
an
d R
even
ue
Pro
ject
ion
s
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
1 -
passenger
car
8,5
01,0
39
8,2
90,9
64
8,3
89,7
65
8,4
19,2
44
7,9
71,4
87
7,8
31,2
60
0.9
80
7,6
74,6
35
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
162,9
71
153,8
27
146,3
66
151,7
67
142,9
44
140,5
02
0.9
70
136,2
87
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
96,3
80
92,1
37
85,8
01
91,0
57
92,2
38
91,0
85
1.0
00
91,0
85
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
67,8
28
62,4
97
49,7
96
52,4
23
59,3
88
62,8
46
1.0
50
65,9
88
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
1,1
75,5
07
1,0
90,0
89
1,0
26,8
29
1,0
23,7
14
966,3
86
983,6
73
0.9
80
963,9
99
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
23,6
63
24,6
37
20,9
28
26,4
90
26,5
63
28,0
51
1.0
14
28,4
43
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
1,1
04
1,0
36
736
871
1,5
83
1,5
74
1.0
00
1,5
74
8 -
specia
l perm
it38
49
32
34
27
12
1.0
00
12
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
10,0
28,5
30
9,7
15,2
36
9,7
20,2
53
9,7
65,6
00
9,2
60,6
16
9,1
39,0
01
0.9
81
8,9
62,0
23
2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
7,8
11,5
28
7,6
21,9
11.5
3$
0.9
8$
7,6
74,6
35
7,4
88,3
41.4
6$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
140,0
92
901,8
95.6
0$
6.4
4$
136,2
87
877,3
99.4
6$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
90,8
47
1,0
72,0
62.0
0$
11.8
0$
91,0
85
1,0
74,8
70.5
8$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
62,6
79
973,4
84.8
0$
15.5
3$
65,9
88
1,0
24,8
77.7
9$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
981,1
39
19,2
55,7
47.7
5$
19.6
3$
963,9
99
18,9
19,3
59.6
2$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
27,9
84
652,9
46.4
0$
23.3
3$
28,4
43
663,6
56.1
8$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
1,5
70
44,7
71.6
0$
28.5
2$
1,5
74
44,8
85.6
7$
8 -
specia
l perm
it12
642.7
0$
Varies
12
-$
To
tals
8,9
62
,02
33
0,0
93
,39
0.7
5$
150,0
00 p
assenger
cars
rem
oved a
s a
result o
f div
ers
ion fro
m the P
ort
land-C
olu
mbia
Toll
Bridge a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
.
38
7,0
00
,00
0
7,5
00
,00
0
8,0
00
,00
0
8,5
00
,00
0
9,0
00
,00
0
9,5
00
,00
0
10
,00
0,0
00
10
,50
0,0
00 2
00
72
00
82
00
92
01
02
01
12
01
22
01
3
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
18
A:
De
law
are
Wa
ter
Ga
p (
I-8
0)
TB
To
ll V
eh
icle
s
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
39
0
20
0,0
00
40
0,0
00
60
0,0
00
80
0,0
00
1,0
00
,00
0
1,2
00
,00
0
1,4
00
,00
0
1,6
00
,00
0
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
18
B:
De
law
are
Wa
ter
Ga
p (
I-8
0)
TB
To
ll T
ruck
s
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
40
Ta
ble
19
: M
ilfo
rd-M
on
tag
ue
To
ll B
rid
ge
Vo
lum
e a
nd
Rev
enu
e P
roje
ctio
ns
cla
ss
20
07
volu
me
20
08
volu
me
20
09
volu
me
20
10
ad
just
ed
volu
me
1
20
11
ad
just
ed
volu
me
2
20
12
a
dju
sted
volu
me
3
facto
r f
rom
20
12
to 2
01
3
20
13
ba
se v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
1 -
passenger
car
1,3
10,0
47
1,2
65,7
73
1,2
57,9
79
1,2
86,1
47
1,2
17,8
92
1,1
81,3
97
0.9
89
1,1
68,4
02
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
26,1
71
26,6
92
22,4
66
22,3
39
21,0
47
20,1
11
0.9
67
19,4
47
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
4,5
45
4,4
86
3,6
45
3,2
75
3,5
44
3,3
23
0.9
42
3,1
30
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
2,0
11
1,5
69
1,4
75
1,5
63
1,8
26
1,8
32
0.9
67
1,7
72
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
8,9
21
8,9
17
7,4
66
7,0
16
6,9
10
7,0
69
0.9
45
6,6
80
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
85
129
93
84
65
65
1.0
00
65
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
11
8
8
8
7
16
1.0
00
16
8 -
specia
l perm
it-
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
00
-
tota
l to
ll vehic
les
1,3
51,7
91
1,3
07,5
74
1,2
93,1
32
1,3
20,4
32
1,2
51,2
92
1,2
13,8
14
0.9
88
1,1
99,5
12
1R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the F
ebru
ary
2010 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 2R
eflects
adju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during the J
anuary
2011 s
now
sto
rm e
vents
. 3R
eflects
Leap Y
ear
adju
stm
ent and a
dju
stm
ent fo
r sig
nific
ant dro
p in toll
traffic
during H
urr
icane S
andy.
cla
ss
20
12
U
na
dju
sted
Volu
me
20
12
net
rev
en
ue
20
12
av
era
ge
toll
ra
te
20
13
tota
l v
olu
me
(proje
cte
d)
20
13
rev
en
ue
1 -
passenger
car
1,1
78,2
89
1,1
45,1
84.4
1$
0.9
7$
1,1
68,4
02
1,1
35,5
75.1
9$
2 -
2-a
xle tru
ck
20,0
52
129,7
99.1
5$
6.4
7$
19,4
47
125,8
82.9
1$
3 -
3-a
xle tru
ck
3,3
14
39,5
96.4
0$
11.9
5$
3,1
30
37,3
97.9
3$
4 -
4-a
xle tru
ck
1,8
28
28,8
00.0
0$
15.7
5$
1,7
72
27,9
17.7
2$
5 -
5-a
xle tru
ck
7,0
51
139,6
32.0
0$
19.8
0$
6,6
80
132,2
85.0
3$
6 -
6-a
xle tru
ck
65
1,5
36.0
0$
23.6
3$
65
1,5
36.0
0$
7 -
7-a
xle tru
ck
16
422.8
0$
26.4
3$
16
422.8
0$
8 -
specia
l perm
it0
-$
Varies
0-
$
To
tals
1,1
99
,51
21
,46
1,0
17
.58
$
41
1,1
00
,00
0
1,1
50
,00
0
1,2
00
,00
0
1,2
50
,00
0
1,3
00
,00
0
1,3
50
,00
0
1,4
00
,00
0 20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
19
A:
Mil
ford
-Mo
nta
gu
e T
B T
oll
Ve
hic
les
Pa
sse
ng
er
Ca
rsT
ota
l T
oll
Ve
hic
les
42
0
5,0
00
10
,00
0
15
,00
0
20
,00
0
25
,00
0
30
,00
0
35
,00
0
40
,00
0
45
,00
0
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
Toll Vehicles (with adjustments as noted)
Ye
ar
Fig
ure
19
B:
Mil
ford
-Mo
nta
gu
e T
B T
oll
Tru
cks
2-A
xle
Tru
ck
s5
-Axle
Tru
ck
sT
ota
l T
oll
Tru
ck
s
43
Ta
ble
20
: V
olu
me
an
d R
even
ue
Co
mp
ari
son
--
20
12
to
20
13
Dis
tric
t
vehic
les
perc
ent
dolla
rsperc
ent
1T
rento
n-M
orr
isvill
e7,9
34,2
50
13,8
61,2
22.2
0$
8,1
29,2
15
14,1
57,7
42.6
7$
194,9
65
2.4
6%
296,5
20.4
7$
2.1
4%
1N
ew
Hope-L
am
bert
vill
e1,8
85,0
26
2,9
95,8
32.9
5$
1,8
56,6
99
2,9
75,6
70.4
6$
-28,3
27
-1.5
0%
(20,1
62.4
9)
$
-0
.67%
2In
ters
tate
78
11,0
46,0
70
53,5
11,3
37.3
1$
11,8
47,8
07
57,5
05,8
88.5
8$
801,7
37
7.2
6%
3,9
94,5
51.2
7$
7.4
6%
2E
asto
n-P
hill
ipsburg
5,3
46,2
30
9,2
77,8
26.2
4$
4,5
44,3
03
6,8
40,2
84.1
0$
-801,9
27
-15.0
0%
(2,4
37,5
42.1
4)
$
-2
6.2
7%
3P
ort
land-C
olu
mbia
1,2
93,9
23
2,2
86,7
69.6
1$
1,2
97,1
09
2,2
98,5
61.6
3$
3,1
86
0.2
5%
11,7
92.0
2$
0.5
2%
3D
ela
ware
Wate
r G
ap
9,1
15,8
51
30,5
23,4
62.3
8$
8,9
62,0
23
30,0
93,3
90.7
5$
-1
53,8
28
-1.6
9%
(430,0
71.6
3)
$
-1.4
1%
3M
ilford
-Monta
gue
1,2
10,6
15
1,4
84,9
70.7
6$
1,1
99,5
12
1,4
61,0
17.5
8$
-11,1
03
-0.9
2%
(23,9
53.1
8)
$
-1
.61%
Tota
l37,8
31,9
65
113,9
41,4
21.4
5$
37,8
36,6
68
115,3
32,5
55.7
7$
4,7
03
0.0
1%
1,3
91,1
34.3
2$
1.2
2%
Rev
enu
e S
um
ma
ry b
y
Bri
dg
e/D
istr
ict
Ch
an
ge
in V
olu
me
Act
ua
l 2
01
2 v
s.
20
13
Pro
ject
ed
20
12
Rev
enu
es2
01
2 U
na
dju
sted
Vo
lum
es
20
13
Vo
lum
e
(Pro
ject
ed)*
20
13
To
ll R
even
ue
(Pro
ject
ed)
Ch
an
ge
in R
even
ue
Act
ua
l 2
01
2 v
s.
20
13
Pro
ject
ed
*Estim
ate
d 2
013 v
olu
mes a
nd r
evenues r
eflect
423,3
19
div
ers
ions f
rom
the E
asto
n-P
hill
ipsburg
toll
bridg
e t
o t
he I
-78 t
oll
bridge a
nd 2
11,3
69 c
ar
div
ers
ion
s f
rom
the E
asto
n
Phill
ipsburg
bridge t
o t
he local bridge.
44
2012 Unadjusted Volumes 2012 Revenue
1 Trenton-Morrisville 7,934,250 13,861,222.20$
1 New Hope-Lambertville 1,885,026 2,995,832.95$
2 Interstate 78 11,046,070 53,511,337.31$
2 Easton-Phillipsburg 5,346,230 9,277,826.24$
3 Portland-Columbia 1,293,923 2,286,769.61$
3 Delaware Water Gap 9,115,851 30,523,462.38$ 3 Milford-Montague 1,210,615 1,484,970.76$
Total 37,831,965 113,941,421.45$
Net Toll Revenue (From above) 113,941,421.45$
Toll Violation Enforcement Revenue1
1,720,625.00$
E-ZPass Service Fees 855,681.00$
Interest Income 1,192,017.00$
Other Income 345,437.00$
1. Total Revenue - 2012 118,055,181.45$
2. Operating Expenses - 2012 44,846,531.00$
3. Net Revenue (Line 1 - Line 2) 73,208,650.45$
4. Annual Debt Service 33,845,000.00$
5. 130% of Annual Debt Service 43,998,500.00$
6. Calcuated Debt (Line 3 / Line 4) 2.16
District Bridge
Table 21: Actual Revenue and Expenditures for 2012
Therefore, the requirement that the Debt Service Coverage Ratio be not less
than 1.30 of the Annual Debt Service has been met, satisfying the requirements
of the current Commission's Bond Indenture, Section 501(a)(1).
Service Coverage Ratio
1This represents income that is used as a partial offset for the maintenance of the
violation enforcement system, the operation of the violation process center, and
violations.
45
2013 Volume* 2013 Revenue
1 Trenton-Morrisville 8,129,215 14,157,742.67$
1 New Hope-Lambertville 1,856,699 2,975,670.46$
2 Interstate 78 11,847,807 57,505,888.58$
2 Easton-Phillipsburg 4,544,303 6,840,284.10$
3 Portland-Columbia 1,297,109 2,298,561.63$
3 Delaware Water Gap 8,962,023 30,093,390.75$
3 Milford-Montague 1,199,512 1,461,017.58$
Total 37,836,668 115,332,555.77$
Net Toll Revenue (From above) 115,332,555.77$
Toll Violation Enforcement Revenue1
1,760,000.00$
E-ZPass Service Fee Estimate (2013 Budgeted) 875,000.00$
Interest Income (2013 Budgeted) 571,000.00$
Other Income (2013 Budgeted) 402,000.00$
1. Total Projected Revenue - 2013 118,940,555.77$
2. Operating Expenses - 2013 (2013 Budgeted) 48,860,064.00$
3. Net Revenue (Line 1 - Line 2) 70,080,491.77$
4. Annual Debt Service (2013 Budgeted) 32,036,296.00$
5. 130% of Annual Debt Service 41,647,184.80$
6. Calcuated Debt (Line 3 / Line 4) 2.19
Table 22: Projected Revenue and Expenditures for 2013
District Bridge
Service Coverage Ratio
1This represents income that is used as a partial offset for the
maintenance of the violation enforcement system, the operation of the
violation process center, and violations.
Therefore, the requirement that the Debt Service Coverage Ratio be
not less than 1.30 of the Annual Debt Service has been met, satisfying
the requirements of the current Commission's Bond Indenture, Section
501(a)(1).
* Estimated 2013 volumes and revenues reflect 423,319
diversions from the Easton-Phillipsburg toll bridge to the I-
78 toll bridge and 211,369 car diversions from the Easton-
Phillipsburg to the local bridge.
46
2012 Projected
Volume
2012 Actual
Volume
2013 Projected
Volume
1 Trenton-Morrisville 8,150,948 7,934,250 8,129,215
1 New Hope-Lambertville 1,930,934 1,885,026 1,856,699
2 Interstate 78 10,741,566 11,046,070 11,847,807
2 Easton-Phillipsburg 5,787,311 5,346,230 4,544,303
3 Portland-Columbia 1,419,335 1,293,923 1,297,109
3 Delaware Water Gap 9,311,766 9,115,851 8,962,023
3 Milford-Montague 1,238,864 1,210,615 1,199,512
Total 38,580,724 37,831,965 37,836,6682012 Projected
Revenue
2012 Actual
Revenue
2013 Projected
Revenue
1 Trenton-Morrisville 14,327,072.86$ 13,861,222.20$ 14,157,742.67$
1 New Hope-Lambertville 2,996,166.00$ 2,995,832.95$ 2,975,670.46$
2 Interstate 78 52,310,450.64$ 53,511,337.31$ 57,505,888.58$
2 Easton-Phillipsburg 10,291,596.47$ 9,277,826.24$ 6,840,284.10$
3 Portland-Columbia 2,460,992.76$ 2,286,769.61$ 2,298,561.63$
3 Delaware Water Gap 30,520,963.22$ 30,523,462.38$ 30,093,390.75$ 3 Milford-Montague 1,508,827.24$ 1,484,970.76$ 1,461,017.58$
Total 114,416,069.19$ 113,941,421.45$ 115,332,555.77$
Net Toll Revenue (From above) 114,416,069.19$ 113,941,421.45$ 115,332,555.77$
Toll Violation Enforcement Revenue 1,850,348.00$ 1,720,625.00$ 1,760,000.00$
E-ZPass Service Fees 756,000.00$ 855,681.00$ 875,000.00$
Interest Income 996,000.00$ 1,192,017.00$ 571,000.00$
Other Income 401,000.00$ 345,437.00$ 402,000.00$
1. Total Revenue 118,419,417.18$ 118,055,181.45$ 118,940,555.77$
2. Operating Expenses 48,213,716.00$ 44,846,531.00$ 48,860,064.00$
3. Net Revenue (Line 1 - Line 2) 70,205,701.18$ 73,208,650.45$ 70,080,491.77$
4. Annual Debt Service 33,885,785.00$ 33,845,000.00$ 32,036,296.00$
5. 130% of Annual Debt Service 44,051,520.50$ 43,998,500.00$ 41,647,184.80$
6. Calcuated Debt (Line 3 / Line 4) 2.07 2.16 2.19
Table 23: Projected vs. Actual Revenue and Expenditures
District Bridge
Service Coverage Ratio
47