Download - Fs4 7
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIIResource Teacher : Ms. Rhivee Mae Halina Signature: ______________Cooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014FS #4- Episode 7 : The Wh- of the Curriculum
My Tools
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014
Technology helps a lot in delivering the curriculum through providing factual and related information by the use of internet. It is a way of maximizing learning through the use of effective instructional materials out from technology. Technology is designed to meet all students’ needs and develop skills of students innovatively.
The criteria in evaluating school curriculum as per mentioned by the faculty member I have interviewed are as follows:
Clarity of the goals of the curriculum or teaching plan. Engagement of the students and teachers in planning the definition of goals and the
implementation of the curriculum. Relation of the planned goals to the society or the community in which the curriculum
will be implemented or the teaching will be done. Relation of some planned to the individual learner and his or her needs, purposes, interest
and abilities. Usefulness of the planned goals as criteria in selecting and developing learning materials
for instruction.
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014
My Enriching Activities
Learned tools of the students in assessing the curriculum
ReflectivePencil-and-paper-strategy
Performance based strategyObservational
BehavioralPortfolio
Personal CommunicationOral
Combination of Strategies
Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014
My Portfolio
ssessment ofA
tudents' learning in aS
ummative manner withS
laborated data result,E
ufficient and S
yntactically correctS
making sure M
valuation is of E
inety-nine percent N
ime-boundT