Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIIResource Teacher : Ms. Rhivee Mae Halina Signature: ______________Cooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014FS #4- Episode 7 : The Wh- of the Curriculum

My Tools

Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014

Technology helps a lot in delivering the curriculum through providing factual and related information by the use of internet. It is a way of maximizing learning through the use of effective instructional materials out from technology. Technology is designed to meet all students’ needs and develop skills of students innovatively.

The criteria in evaluating school curriculum as per mentioned by the faculty member I have interviewed are as follows:

Clarity of the goals of the curriculum or teaching plan. Engagement of the students and teachers in planning the definition of goals and the

implementation of the curriculum. Relation of the planned goals to the society or the community in which the curriculum

will be implemented or the teaching will be done. Relation of some planned to the individual learner and his or her needs, purposes, interest

and abilities. Usefulness of the planned goals as criteria in selecting and developing learning materials

for instruction.

Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014

My Enriching Activities

Learned tools of the students in assessing the curriculum

ReflectivePencil-and-paper-strategy

Performance based strategyObservational

BehavioralPortfolio

Personal CommunicationOral

Combination of Strategies

Name of FS Student : Ian Jim A. BaysonCourse : BSED- English Year and Section: IIICooperating School : JH Cerilles State CollegeDate of Visit : September 1, 2014

My Portfolio

ssessment ofA

tudents' learning in aS

ummative manner withS

laborated data result,E

ufficient and S

yntactically correctS

making sure M

valuation is of E

inety-nine percent N

ime-boundT