International Intellectual Property
Profs. Atik and ManheimFall, 2006
Cybersquatting[slides by David Steele]
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 2
CybersquattingFederal cause of actionState cause of action
Cal Bus & Prof. Code § 17525(a)It is unlawful for a person, with a bad faith
intent to register, traffic in, or use a domain name, that is identical or confusingly similar to the personal name of another living person or deceased personality, without regard to the goods or services of the parties.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 3
Federal cause of actionAnticybersquatting Consumer Protection
ActAlso known as the ACPA15 U.S.C. 1125(d)§43(d) of the Lanham Act
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 4
15 U.S.C. 1125(d) - Cyberpiracy
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)provides a civil action by the owner of a
markany mark protected under Lanham actwithout regard to the goods or services of
the parties, that person
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 5
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)bad faith intent to profit from that
mark; andregisters, traffics in, or uses a domain
name that--identical or confusingly similar to a
distinctive mark;identical or confusingly similar to a
famous mark;dilutive of a famous mark
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 6
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(B)determining “a bad faith intent to profit”consider factors (but not limited to)
Defensive factorsregistrant’s rights in the domain name;legal name or commonly known by name;bona fide offering of any goods or services;noncommercial or fair use of the mark
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 7
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(B)determining “a bad faith intent to profit”consider factors (but not limited to)
Offensive factorsregistrant’s intent to divert consumers to its site for
commercial gain or to tarnish or disparage the mark
registrant’s offer to sell domain name registrant’s uses fake contact information when
registeringregistrant’s registration of multiple domain names
that are TMsfame of mark within the meaning of subsection (c)
(1) of section 43.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 8
Remedies II15 USC 1117(d)
statutory damages $1,000 - $100,000 per domain name for violation of 1125(d)(1)
the plaintiff may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered by the trial court, to recover, instead of actual damages and profits,
as the court considers just
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 9
Retroactiveinjunctive relief also okdamages ok if
registered after act; orrenewed after act; orused after act.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 10
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(2)(D)Remedy for in rem action - injunction
only(D)(i) The remedies in an in rem action
under this paragraph shall be limited to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 11
15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(2)(D)Immunity for registrars and registries
(D)(ii) The domain name registrar or registry or other domain name authority shall not be liable for injunctive or monetary relief under this paragraph except in the case of bad faith or reckless disregard, which includes a willful failure to comply with any such court order.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 12
In Rem actions in non-ACPA cases?What if the domain name (the
defendant) violates via dilution or infringement? Can a plaintiff sue the domain name in rem?
Split in circuits4th Cir. Says sure…
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 13
Safe Harbor15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(B)(ii) Bad faith intent shall not be found if
court determines def. believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was a fair use or otherwise lawful.
Def. Must BOTH believe; and have reasonable grounds to believe
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 14
Understanding ICANNThe Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN) is a technical coordination body for the Internet. Created in October 1998 by a broad coalition of the Internet's business, technical, academic, and user communities, ICANN is assuming responsibility for a set of technical functions previously performed under U.S. government contract by IANA and other groups.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 15
Understanding ICANNSpecifically, ICANN coordinates the
assignment of the following identifiers that must be globally unique for the Internet to function:Internet domain namesIP address numbersprotocol parameter and port numbers
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 16
ICANN and Domain Name Disputes one of the key functions of ICANN is to create and
administrate disputes over domain names one of the factions at the negotiating table was the
TM lobby the TM lobby pressured US Gov., who pressured ICANN
ICANN enacts the UDRP
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 17
Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy
application of policy by contractICANN - Registrar - Registrantpolicy issue - why do this at all?
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 18
UDRPProcedural issues
Dispute ProvidersWIPONational Arbitration ForumCPR Institute for Dispute Resolution
# of panel member - one or three memberspayment of fees
WIPO - $1,500; NAF - $1,150Language of proceeding - same as language of
registration agreementTime deadline
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 19
URDP - Prima Facie ElementsComplainant has burden to prove all
of the following three elements:The D.N. is identical or confusingly similar
to Complainant’s mark;Respondent has no rights or legitimate
interest in the D.N.; andRespondent registered and is using D.N.
in bad faith.
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 20
UDRP - Prong 1The D.N. is identical or confusingly
similar to Complainant’s mark;Same language as ACPANOT likelihood of confusion testignore TLD string
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 21
UDRP - Prong 2Respondent Has No Rights or
Legitimate Interest in the Domain Namethree expressly enumerated defenses, more
availablebefore notice of dispute, use or preparation to use in
connection with a bona fide offering of goods or servicesN.B. unlawful is not bona
commonly known by the domain namelegitimate noncommercial or fair use of domain name
without intent to misleading divert consumers or tarnish mark
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 22
UDRP - Prong 3Registration and Use In Bad Faith
not really both…four expressly enumerated
circumstances of bad faith, more available1) acquired primarily to sell to
Complainant / mark owner for $$2) to prevent mark owner from using it -
must also show pattern
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 23
UDRP - Prong 3four expressly enumerated
circumstances of bad faith, more available3) primarily for the purpose of disrupting
the business of a competitor4) intentionally attempted to attract, for
commercial gain, Internet users to your web site by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 24
Implementing UDRP decisions
time line10 business days for registrant to file suit
n.b. suit should be filed in selected mutual jdxbut what if it’s not?? See ACPA 15 U.S.C.
1114 (d)(2)(D)(i)(II) cited aboveafter 10 days, complainant sends
registrar new whois detailsregistrar implements decision
what if registrar doesn’t?what if registrar is told by local court not to?
Fall, 2006 Int'l IP 25
Appeals of UDRPabout the Federal Arbitration Actpromotes arbitrationpromotes contractsstandard of review