Download - Judge Dale Sovereignty
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
1/10
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventure-complete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf
Judge Dale
(retired)
Our federal government has instructed our
federal, state and local police agenciesthat everyone who purports to be aSOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a
TERRORIST! They have also brainwashed the
American public into believing that being aSOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic!Perhaps this is: The POT calling the KETTLE
black?
WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherentright and prerogative of a civilized people to
rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms andconditions of the institutions it sets up to carry
out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREMECOURT agrees with those people who claim tobe SOVEREIGN citizens of the AmericanRepublic!
Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 2000,The Supreme Court held that the American
People are in fact Sovereign and not the Statesor the Government. The court went on todefine that local, state and federal law
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/04/18/leading-the-fbi-down-the-path/ -
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
2/10
enforcement officers were committing unlawfulactions against the Sovereign People by the
enforcement of the laws and are personally
liable for their actions.
Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 2000 Supreme Court Cited by 761 litigants in
other cases.
Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 2011 Supreme Court Cited by 306
Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 1993 Court of
Appeals, 7th Cited by 66
What are the implications of this 2000, U. S.
Supreme Court ruling?
1] The delegates to the first Federal
Convention prohibited the use of corporationsby all governments representing the American
Republic. Therefore, all of these corporategovernments and their corporate laws are ausurpation of the organic Constitution of theUnited States of America. All StateGovernments are now sub-corporations of the
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
3/10
Federal Government, making all Courts and alllaw enforcement personnel, corporate federal
agencies or employees. [See: James Madison
Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P.722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PCand search the Code for the words District of
Columbia and Federal Government. You willreceive about 1000 references linking yourstate to the federal government.]
2] The state and federal government is acorporation and therefore the Congress, StateLegislatures, City Councils, Municipalities andall State and Federal Courts are corporateentities posing as Constitutional branches of
government.
3] Corporations are privately owned
businesses, meaning that the Corporate UnitedStates belongs to one or more privateindividuals, which is always governed by a
Board of Directors. The Corporate UnitedStates is privately owned by a group of
European Royal and Elite individuals tied to theFederal Reserve System and the letters of
incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. ThePresident of the United States is actually theCEO of the United States and the Congress and
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
4/10
all others are corporate employees. Everythingthey do is in the interest of the corporate
owners! I cant access those documents
because of National Security.
4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal
Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public,government must be SOVEREIGN too, which isan accepted RULE of LAW derived from the,
Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and
can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real,they are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by thesegovernment corporations are private corporateregulations called public law, statutes, codes
and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do
the Judge and your lawyer know about this?You bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are notSOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or
enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only createand enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound
to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. TheLaw of Contracts requires signed written
agreements and complete transparency! Didyou ever agree to be arrested and tried underany of their corporate statutes? For that
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
5/10
matter, did you ever agree to contract withthem by agreeing to be sued for violating their
corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts butthey lack transparency because you were
never told what might happen to you if youagree to contract, and that you had a right torefuse the accommodation!]
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdictionover a SOVEREIGN? Yes but only by yourconsent to be judged by the Court. Can theycompel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appearor participate in their process? No they cantcompel you and Yes they can ask but you
can reject the accommodation in writing and
nothing can be done about it because you haverefused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes bylocal, state and federal law enforcement
officers are unlawful actions being committedagainst the SOVEREIGN public and these
officers can be held personally liable for theiractions. [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Lawsor Transparency in the American Justice
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
6/10
System, everyone arrested, convicted andsentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS
are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all
American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the County and State Prisons and
all of the Federal Prisons are privately ownedcorporate businesses for profit, which kick backto the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of
Prisons Privatization Management Branch
provides general oversight, for theseinstitutions. So if you are convicted in theseCourts, you can expect to serve some jail time!Now you know why America has such highprison populations!
11] Can the State Government and Courts take
Custody of your children? Only with yourconsent, otherwise their agents and officers
can be held personally liable for their actions!Orphans are a different matter and canbecome wards of the Court until emancipated.
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the
organic American Constitution and thiscorporatist onslaught in America has since its
creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN andTERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the realTERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
7/10
Republic.
Blessings, Judge Dale, retired
Sovereignty was first recognized by the high Court in this
case.
CHISHOLM, Ex'r. versus
GEORGIA.
SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED
STATES,2 U.S. 419; 1 L. Ed.
440; 1793 U.S.
LEXIS 249; 2 Dall. 419
"To the Constitution of the United States
the term SOVEREIGN, is totally
unknown. There is but one place whereit could have been used with
propriety. But, even in that place it
would not, perhaps, have comported
with the delicacy of those, who ordained
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
8/10
[***86] and established that
Constitution. They might have
announced themselves "SOVEREIGN"
people of the United States: But serenelyconscious of the fact, they avoided the
ostentatious declaration."
"As the State has claimed precedence of
the people; so, in the same inverted
course of things, the Government has
often claimed precedence of the State;and to this perversion in the Second
degree, many of the volumes of
confusion concerning sovereignty owe
their existence."
Sovereignty was defined and those who
are sovereign were identified by this
case; and, it is the standing law on
sovereignty today.
Supreme Court in DRED SCOTT v. JOHN F. A. SANDFORD, 60 U.S. 393
(1857), where the High Court stated, in relevant part:
@ 404
The words "people of the United States" and
"citizens" are synonymous terms, and mean the same
thing. They both describe the political body
who, according to our republican institutions, form the
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
9/10
sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the
Government through their representatives. They are what
we familiarly call the sovereign people, and every citizen
is one of this people, and a constituent member of thissovereignty...
It is true, every person, and every class and description of
persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the
Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States,
became also citizens of this new political body; but none
other; it was formed by them, and for them andtheirposterity, but for no one else. And the personal
rights and privileges guarantied to citizens of this new
sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who
were then members of the several State communities,
or who should afterwards by birthright or otherwise
become members, according to the provisions of the
Constitution and the principles on which it was founded.(emphasis added) Scott v. Sanford, 60 U.S. 393, at 406.
Even the States recognize this sovereignty.
R. W. Kemper v. The State,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS
63 Tex. Crim. 1; 138 S.W. 1025; 1911
Tex. Crim. App.
-
7/27/2019 Judge Dale Sovereignty
10/10
LEXIS 365
The rule in America is that the American
people are the sovereign, and in them is
lodged all power, and the agencies of
government possess no authority save that
which is delegated to them by the
people. Also, see Perry v. United
States,
294 US 330, 353 (1935), The Congress asthe instrumentality of sovereignty is
endowed with certain powers to be exerted
on behalf of the people in the manner and
with the effect the Constitution
ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the
sovereign power of the people to override
their will as thus declared.