Transcript
Page 1: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations

Minnesota Department of Transportation

FHWA Talking Freight SeminarAugust 17, 2005

Page 2: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Planning Context

Minnesota StatewideFreight Plan

Minnesota StatewideTransportation Plan

Minnesota DOTStrategic Plan

Page 3: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Statewide Freight Policy

“Provide an integrated system of freight transportation in Minnesota - highway, rail, water, air cargo and

intermodal terminals - that offers safe, reliable, and competitive access to

statewide, national and international markets.”

Page 4: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Freight Policy Framework

• Improve Statewide Infrastructure• Improve National/International

Infrastructure• Enhance Operations and Safety• Enhance Freight Integration• Strengthen Partnerships• Streamline Regulatory Activities

Page 5: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Tie measures to freight policies and strategies

• Understandable to shippers, carriers, elected officials, transportation officials– Minnesota Freight Advisory Committee

Freight Performance Measure CriteriaCR

ITER

IA

Page 6: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• What decisions are affected?

• How will we use the measures?

• Is the data available? What resources are needed?

• How will know when we have successful performance?

Freight Performance Measure CriteriaCR

ITER

IA

Page 7: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• What is being measured:

– Input- e.g., Budget allocation– Process- e.g., Permits Issued– Outputs- e.g., Miles of 10 ton highways– Outcomes- e.g., Fatalities on highway

system

Freight Performance Measure CriteriaCR

ITER

IA

Page 8: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Performance Measure vs. Indicator– Sphere of Control vs. Sphere of Influence– Program vs. Economic Indicators

• Perspective– Statewide vs. Regional vs. Local– Corridor vs. Mode

Freight Performance Measure CriteriaCR

ITER

IA

Page 9: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Infrastructure• Local Access• Global Connections• Safety• Regulation

Freight PerformanceMeasure Categories

Page 10: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Pavement ride quality is acceptable• Bridge structures meets standards• Rail track-miles with track speeds greater

than or equal to 25 mph• Rail track-miles with 286,000 lb railcar

rating• Intermodal facilities with adequate infrastructure condition

Freight Performance Measures:Infrastructure

INFR

ASTR

UCT

URE

Page 11: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Major freight generators with appropriate roadway/rail access

• Intermodal facilities (ports/terminals) with appropriate roadway/rail access.

• Airports with air cargo operations and appropriate roadway access

Freight Performance Measures:Local Access

LOCA

L AC

CESS

Page 12: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Direct international air cargo freight service• Average delays at river locks• Capacity of container-handling & bulk

transfer facilities

Freight Performance Measures:Global Connections

GLO

BAL

CON

NEC

TIO

NS

Page 13: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Heavy truck crash rate• Heavy truck-related fatalities• Crashes at rail crossings (3-yr avg.)• Fatalities at rail crossings (3-yr avg.) • At-grade rail crossings meeting grade-separation guidelines

Freight Performance Measures:Safety

SAFE

TY

Page 14: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• % overweight trucks on major highways• Coordinate regulation with adjoining states• Permits & credentials via the internet• Carriers trained• Pavement life preserved by truck weight enforcement

Freight Performance Measures:Streamlined and Effective

RegulationRE

GU

LATI

ON

Page 15: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

• Competitive Rates (selected commodities, modes, markets)

• Mode Share (major commodity groups)• Geographic Market Share (tons/value

to/from major trading partners)• Travel Times (commodities, modes,

markets)

Freight Performance Indicators(Developed by MFAC)

IND

ICAT

ORS

Page 16: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Truck-Related Fatalities

Page 17: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Railroad Crossing Fatalities

Page 18: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Clearance Time

Page 19: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Congestion

Page 20: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Pavement Condition

Page 21: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Example:Permits

Web-based Permit Applications Received

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

July-

04 (2

5%)

Aug-0

4 (24

%)

Sept-0

4 (25

%)

Octobe

r-04

Novem

ber-0

4

Decem

ber-0

4

Janu

ary-05

Februa

ry-05

March

-05

April-0

5

May-05

June

-05

Page 22: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

More Information

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ofrw/statewide_plan.htm

Minnesota Statewide Freight Plan now available online

Page 23: Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures

Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and

Commercial Vehicle OperationsMinnesota Department of Transportation

[email protected]

Contact Information


Top Related