NAVFAC HAWAII
December 2010
Design-Build at NAVFAC Hawaii
NAVFAC Pacific Designer Builder Symposium 2010
NAVFAC Hawaii Capital ImprovementsDesign Division
2 December 2010
Session Overview
• NAVFAC Hawaii– Who we are, our relationship to NAVFAC Pacific– Workload projections, construction contracts and A-E services
• Why Design-Build– How does Design-Build support our mission
• Design-Build– Design-Build basics – How does NAVFAC Hawaii do Design-Build. – What are similarities or differences to NAVFAC Pacific.
• New Developments and On-going Topics– Desirables and Betterments– Collateral equipment– Shop drawings required as part of Final design documentation– CCASS evaluations
• Related Sessions– Order of Precedence– Sustainability– Panel Discussion
3
NAVFAC Organization
Echelon 2
Echelon 3
Commander, NAVFAC Atlantic
RDML Kevin R. Slates
Commander, NAVFAC Pacific
RDML Kate Gregory
NAVFACHQ
NAVFACAtlantic
NAVFACMid-Atlantic
NAVFACPacific
NAVFACSouthwest
NAVFACSoutheast
NAVFACWashington
NAVFACMidwest
NAVFACNorthwest
NAVFACEurope
NAVFACHawaii
NAVFACFar East
NAVFACMarianas
NFESC NFELC NCC
Echelon 4
4 December 2010
Small Business
Safety
Com
man
ds
Business/Support Lines
Asset Management
Environmental
Capital Improvements
Acquisition
Financial Management
Chief Information Officer
Counsel
Public Works
NAVFAC Organization
NAVFAC LANT
NAVFAC PAC
NAVFAC Japan
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic
NAVFAC Washington
NAVFAC Midwest
NAVFAC Southeast
NAVFAC Northwest
NAVFAC Europe
NAVFAC Guam
NAVFAC Hawaii
NAVFAC Expeditionary Logistics Center
NAVFAC Engineering Service Center
Navy Crane Center
NAVFAC HQ
NF LANT NF PACNAVFAC Southwest
Vertical:1. Mission
Accountability2. Client Interface3. Project Mgt/Execution4. Performance
Horizontal:1. Business Processes2. Resource Allocation3. Community Mgmt4. Corporate Metrics5. NAVFAC Program
Mgt/Execution
5
NAVFAC HAWAII - Who are we?
• Established 10 March 2005
• Highly diverse, talented organization
• Large employer of local trade and white-collar expertise.
Approximately 1,600 civilians and 120 architects and engineers in the Capital Improvement Business Line. Added Air Force civilians & military –Oct. 1, 2010 due to joint basing.
Provides: engineering & contracting expertise, maintenance, repair, demolition, environmental, utilities (electricity, water, steam, air, & wastewater treatment), base development, maintains & leases vehicles.
6 December 2010
Capital Improvements – Project Type
• NAVFAC Hawaii is the Navy's single touch-point for most facilities engineering products and services in Hawaii
- Some projects executed by NAVAC Pacific
• Provides service to Marine Corps, Air Force, and Army
• State of Hawaii Area of Responsibility (AOR)
• Wide range of projects:
– Military Construction (MILCON)• Mission funded – provided directly to the command from the Federal budget via Congressional
appropriation , multi-year process• Typically new buildings, large renovations• Awarded on stand-alone as well as MACC task orders contracts• Typically A-E contract document preparation
– Special Projects• Locally funded > $400,000• Typically renovations, can include new buildings• Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), or Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)
contracts• Mostly A-E contract document preparation, some in-house
– Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM)• Repair and renovation projects < $400,000• MACC, Multi-trade and single trade IDIQ• Typically in-house contract document preparation
7 December 2010
Workload Trends: NAVFAC Hawaii Design Projection
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Mill
ions
$
MILCON
SpecialProjects
SRM via IDIQ Contracts
SRM via Shop Construction
8
Workload Trends: NAVFAC Hawaii Construction Projection
9 December 2010
Why Design-Build?
• NAVFAC Objectives and Considerations
– For Navy and Navy Reserve Military (MCON/MCNR), acquisition strategy goal of 75% Design-Build, 25% Design-Bid-Build. Policy set by HQ.
– For MILCON and other projects, execution method is more flexible, local command decision based on workload, schedule, available funds.
Advantages of Design-Build:
Shorter duration from initial design to contract award than traditional Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
Fiscal year obligation. Difficult to reprogram a congressionally appropriated project. Limits to additional program area and cost.
Less contentious, partnership.
Suited for standardized building types, or conversely technically complex projects requiring non-standard design and construction.
10 December 2010
What is Design-Build?
• Design-Build is a construction project delivery system where design and construction are contracted with a single entity known as the design-builder or design-build contractor. A “2-party” agreement.
• Typically, a General Contractor is the prime contractor who subcontracts a design team.
• By contrast, Design-Bid-Build is a traditional “3-party” agreement betweenseparate design and construction entities.
• Design-Build is defined by the contract, not the format of the Request for Proposal (RFP).
• The RFP describes the project requirements and is a contract document.
• “Design” is the construction documentation that the project is constructed from. The project is not constructed from the RFP. The Design-build entity prepares the construction documentation.
11 December 2010
Requirements
RFP
Design-BuildContract
Design-Build Process
CompletedFacility
12 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build
• NAVFAC has been utilizing DB since the late 1980’s
• NAVFAC’s Chief Engineer in FY2001 initiated a single Design-Build Procurement Format
– Create common business practices across NAVFAC– Utilize Navy and DoD Criteria, Standards, Specifications, and lessons
learned– Utilize Uniformat as a basic information structure– Develop performanced based requirements
• Navy chose to create one Design-Build Master (NDBM) request for proposal template (RFP) that covered as many building types as possible
– Template versus identical RFP’s– Flexibility within template
• Continuous improvement and evolution
13 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – ResourcesWhole Building Design Guide
www.wbdg .org/ndbm
14 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – 6 Part Format
PART 6
PART 5
PART 4
PART 3
PART 2
PART 1Proposal Forms & Documents
Performance Technical Specifications
Prescriptive Specifications
Attachments
Project Program
General Requirements
15 December 2010
01 14 00.05 20 WORK RESTRICTIONS 01 20 00.05 20 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES 01 30 00.05 20 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 01 31 19.05 20 POST AWARD MEETINGS01 32 16.00 20 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS
DOCUMENTATION01 32 17.05 20 NETWORK ANALYSIS SCHEDULES (NAS)01 33 00.05 20 CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES01 33 10.05 20 DESIGN SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES01 35 13.05 20 SPECIAL PROJECT PROCEDURES 01 35 29.05 20 SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
REQUIREMENTS 01 45 00.05 20 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION QUALITY
CONTROL01 50 00.05 20 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS 01 57 19.05 20 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 01 57 19.01 20 SUPPLIMENTARY TEMPORARY EV CONTROLS01 74 19.05 20 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE
MANAGEMENT01 78 24.05 20 FACILITY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
SUPPORT INFORMATION (OMSI)
Division
01
PART 2
Table of Contents
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 2GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
16 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 2Part 2 Preparation
•Part 2, General Requirements are NOT BOILERPLATE• Do not download from Whole Building Design Guide website.• Many NAVFAC Hawaii specific requirements:
– Safety, Environmental, Client (PHNSY and IMF, MCBH)• Many project specific requirements:
– Post award meetings, design and construction submittals, quality control
– Even for MACC contracts that have General Requirements in the basic contract, substantial amount of editing required for each task order.
– How Part 2 is prepared depends on the type of contract and who is preparing
• AE prepared: MILCON, Special Projects• In-house: SRM
PART 2
17 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 2Part 2 Preparation
AE prepared RFP:• Differences between NAVFAC Hawaii Design Managers, not
everyone it does the same way.• MACC RFP’s will be essentially similar to stand-alone contracts
– all applicable sections should be included.• Generally, NAVFAC Hawaii will provide edited word
documents without header/footers.• AE’s should confirm with the NFH Design Manager.• MACC contractors note that task order requirements supersede
basic contract requirements.
In-house prepared RFP:• Usually MACC task orders.• May only include edits to the basic contract requirements.
PART 2
18 December 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
2.1 Mission Statement 2.2 Facility Function 2.3 Project Specific Priorities 2.4 Appropriate Design 2.5 Workflow Process 2.6 Special Design Challenges 2.7 Adaptability and Flexibility
3. SITE ANALYSIS 3.1 Existing Site Conditions 3.2 Site Development Requirements
4. BUILDING REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Space Tabulation (EXCEL form at http:www.wbdg.org/ndbm/download) 4.2 Space Relationships 4.3 Exterior Character
5. ROOM REQUIREMENTS 6. ENGINEERING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS
A10 Foundations A20 Basement Construction B10 Superstructure B20 Exterior Enclosure B30 Roofing C10 Interior Construction C20 Stairs C30 Interior Finishes D10 Conveying D20 Plumbing D30 HVAC
D40 Fire Protection Systems D50 Electrical Power & Lighting E10 Equipment E20 Furnishings F10 Special Construction F20 Selective Building Demolition G10 Site Preparations G20 Site Improvements G30 Site Civil/Mechanical Utilities G40 Site Electrical Utilities G90 Other Site Improvements
COVER PAGE
Project Program
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Consists of 6 Chapters
PART 3
Master Format
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 3PROJECT PROGRAM
“Basis of Design” Data. Obtain majority of the data during the FACD/charrette.
19 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 3www.wbdg.org/ ndbm
PART 3
Browse
Download:
Individual parts, or entire template
20 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 32.0 Project Objectives – Sustainable design
PART 3
21 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 32.0 Project Objectives – Sustainable design
PART 3
LEED v3:
Updates ECB 2008-01 credit requirements. Feasibility of credits should be verified during FACD, or as early during RFP prep as possible
22 December 2010
PART 3
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 35.0 Room Requirements
Room requirements identified Part 3 and usually Part 6 –RFP drawings as well
23 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 36.0 Engineering System Requirements – ESR
PART 3
Browse
ESR’s organized differently than CSI
format
24 December 2010
6.0 ENGINEERING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTSA10 FOUNDATIONSA20 BASEMENT CONSTRUCTION
B10 SUPERSTRUCTUREB20 EXTERIOR ENCLOSUREB30 ROOFING
C10 INTERIOR CONSTRUCTIONC20 STAIRSC30 INTERIOR FINISHES
D10 CONVEYING D20 PLUMBINGD30 HVACD40 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMSD50 ELECTRICAL
E10 EQUIPMENTE20 FURNISHINGS
PART 3
“Engineering Systems” correspond with PART 4 PTSs using the UNIFORMAT numbering system
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 36.0 Engineering System Requirements - ESR
25 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 36.0 Engineering System Requirements - ESR
PART 3
ESR C10 Interior Construction - example
Uniformat Number: correlates to Room Requirements as well as Part 4
Do not delete unused paragraphs, indicate “Not Used”
26 December 2010
• Part 3, Project Program is project specific and the downloaded template must be edited.
• Use the Browse feature of the WBDG website to assist editing.
• Part 3 is the most important part of the RFP, conflicts between Part 3 and other parts are governed by the Order of Precedence Clause.
• Often additional room requirements are referred to in Part 6, RFP drawings. This requires careful coordination.
• Uniformat numbering correlates Engineering System Requirements with Part 4, Performance Technical Specifications. Part 3 ESR’s control how Part 4 is applied to the project.
PART 3
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part3Summary
27 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4Performance Technical Specifications - PTS
PART 4
PTS’s organized exactly the same as
Part 3 ESR’s
28 December 2010
• PTSs corresponds to Part 3 , “Engineering Systems Requirements” via the Uniformat numbering system
• PTSs identify:
• Design Criteria (UFC, UFGS, Industry Codes, etc.)
• Field Verification & Acceptance Testing
• Performance & Quality of Facility Elements
PART 4
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4Performance Technical Specifications - PTS
29 December 2010
PART 4
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4PERFORMANCE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (PTS)
• PTS states how a “built element” must perform without dictating how to design or construct it. States criteria that applies regardless of the design solution. (e.g. Windows shall meet AT/FP, 175 mph winds, not leak, last 15 years)
• Part 3 ESR: What you want in the project ESR’s are edited
• Part 4 PTS: How those elements must perform PTS’s are NOT edited
30 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4PERFORMANCE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (PTS)
PART 4
PTS C10 Interior Construction - example
31 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4Draft Uniform Facilit ies Criteria - UFC
PART 4
Draft UFC’s apply to DB projects. WBDG “Design Guidance”
32 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 4Draft Uniform Facilit ies Criteria - UFC
PART 4
33 December 2010
Section
13112
Section
11194
Section
09972
Only use prescriptive specifications (UFGS) when performance specifications are not practical. Intent is to have zero or minimal UFGSs. (Sections shown are for example only.)
PART 5
Master Format
Interior Coating Of Steel Tanks
Detention Hardware
Cathodic Protection
System (Steel Water
Tanks)
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 5PRESCRIPTIVE SPECIFICATIONS
34 December 2010
Permits Record of Decisions (PROD) Form
Geotechnical Report
Site Survey:Attachments may be: 8-1/2 X 11, 11 X 17 or D-Size Drawings
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Asbestos & Lead Paint Reports
Drawings & Sketches
Others as required
PART 6
MasterFormat
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Part 6ATTACHMENTS
35 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIIBridging Documents
•Bridging documents are included in Part 6 as attachments.• Bridging documents are considered prescriptive requirements.
• If included, they need to be carefully coordinated with the other requirements of the RFP.
• There is not a set “percentage of design” that defines bridging documents.
• When bridging documents should be considered:– When a specific configuration is important– When Historic consultation is required prior to award– When price will be a factor in determining award
• Does not preclude changes after award
36 December 2010
The contract consists of solicitation, approved proposal, & final design.
NFAS Clause 5252.236-9312 and UFGS 01 33 10.05 20 (Design Submittal Procedures) determine the precedence in case of a conflict. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between any of the below described portions of the conformed contract, precedence shall be given in the following order:
a. Any portions of the proposal or final design that exceed the requirements of the solicitation.
(1) Any portion of the proposal that exceeds the final design.(2) Any portion of the final design that exceeds the proposal.(3) Where portions within either the proposal or the final design conflict, the portion that most exceeds the requirements of the solicitation has precedence.
b. The requirements of the solicitation, in descending order of precedence:(1) Standard Form 1442, Price Schedule, and Davis Bacon Wage Rates, (2) Part 1 - Contract Clauses, (3) Part 2 - General Requirements, (4) Part 3 - Project Program Requirements, (5) Part 6 - Attachments (excluding Concept Drawings), (6) Part 5 - Prescriptive Specifications exclusive of performance specifications, (7) Part 4 - Performance Specifications exclusive of prescriptive specifications, (8) Part 6 - Attachments (Concept Drawings).
NAVFAC Design-Build Master ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
37 December 2010
NAVFAC Design-Build Master – Model RFPs
38 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIIAcquisition Strategy
•ACQUISITION STRATEGY INFLUENCES RFP
– DETERMINATION OF HOW THE CONTRACT WILL BE AWARDED IS A KEY CONSIDERATION AND WILL DIRECTLY IMPACT THE DESIGN PROCESS AND CONTENT OF THE RFP.
– WHAT TYPE OF CONTRACT WILL BE USED, STAND ALONE, MACC (WHICH ONE), SMALL BUSINESS
– MACC TASK ORDER RFP’S: CANNOT BEGIN TO PREPARE THE RFP WITHOUT CONFIRMATION OF SPECIFIC CONTRACT TO BE WRITTEN AGAINST. THIS IS MORE OF A CONSIDERATION FOR IN-HOUSE RFP PREPARATION THAN AE.
– TWO BASIC STRATEGIES ARE:
BEST VALUE LOW PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)
39 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIIAcquisition Strategy
• ACQUISITION STRATEGY – BEST VALUE:
WILL BE USED EXTENSIVELY IN FY2011 AND LIKELY FY 2012
• REQUIRES BOARD SELECTION
• WILL INVOLVE DESIRABLES AND BETTERMENTS
• CAN BE USED FOR MACC TASK ORDERS OR STAND-ALONE CONTRACTS
PRO: USED TO MAXIMIZE APPROPRIATION OR FUNDING
CON: TIME CONSUMING TO SELECT AWARDEE
40 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIIAcquisition Strategy
• ACQUISITION STRATEGY - LOW PRICE (TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE):
– AWARD BASED ON PRICE
– USUALLY USED ON MACC TASK ORDERS
– CAN BE USED ON STAND-ALONE AWARDS
– REQUIRES A PRESCRIPTIVE ORIENTED RFP (BRIDGING DOCUMENTS): COMPARE APPLES TO APPLES
PRO’S: FASTER, MORE STRAIGHTFORWARD AWARD PROCESS
CON: NOT ABLE TO MAXIMIZE APPROPRIATION OR FUNDING AS WELL AS BEST VALUE
41 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•DESIRABLES AND BETTERMENTS:– Evaluated as part of the technical evaluation, in addition to price, to
determine Best Value for the government.
– Typically used for MILCON projects, but not limited to.
– Intent: Maximize appropriation with an emphasis on minimizing Total Ownership Cost
Desirables: Government stipulated Betterments: Offeror proposed
– Sample Basis of Award requirement:
“ Offerors shall identify desirables and/or betterments that have been provided within their proposal while still remaining within the stated budget. A betterment is an applicable improvement/enhancement that provides quality and/or value to the basic RFP requirement”
42 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•DESIRABLES AND BETTERMENTS:– Desirables:
• Listed in order of preference
• Include criteria for each desirable in Parts 3 and 4. Very important to provide sufficient criteria, similarly to any other project requirement, and to coordinate within the RFP.
• Sample desirables may include:– Enhanced Commissioning– Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems– Building Integrated or Mounted Photovoltaic Energy Generation System– Advanced Metering– Improved Energy Performance – achieve energy consumption levels 40%
below ASHRAE Standard 90.1
• May include other features not energy related. Must be within the scope of the project/DD 1391.
43 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•DESIRABLES AND BETTERMENTS:
– Betterments:• Proposal Submission Requirements would typically provide guidance:
“ …reduce energy/utility consumption, reduce the total cost of ownership, and/or increase the reliability, maintainability and/or accessibility of the facility…”
• Pricing shall be provided for each Betterment.– Would be used during the best value trade-off analysis.
Technical evaluation completed first, then price.
44 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•Collateral Equipment:
– “Turn-key” method for Design-Build is now preferred.• Traditionally, Govt or Govt’s AE have prepared Collateral Equipment (CEQ)
buy packages and procured and installed. This is still typical for Design-Bid-Build contracts.
– Only applies to Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment ( FF&E)• Examples would include modular furniture, workstations, seating, filing,
training and conference furniture, window treatments.
• Would exclude certain types of equipment. Confirm with NAVFAC.
45 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•Collateral Equipment:
– “Turn-key”:• Govt AE prepares a partial FF& E Buy Package – “60%”• This will be included in the RFP or solicitation package
• Sample Govt AE SOW:For DB projects, the A-E shall include a 60% CEQ Buy Package submittal with the DB RFP solicitation package, which shall include the following :
- Collateral Equipment Summarized List (Cost Estimate to include freight, installation, contingency and procurement fees)
- Procurement Data Sheets (description of each CEQ item, vendor information, GSA contract number)
- Catalog Cuts- Furniture Placement Plans based on the concept design
46 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•Collateral Equipment:
• Design-Builder completes the Buy Package– Assures most current user/client requirements– Assures coordination with Final Design, changes from the RFP
• Buy Package must be reviewed by the client, FF & E funding source, and NAVFAC Interior Designer/CEQ Manager.
47 December 2010
DESIGN-BUILD AT NAVFAC HAWAIINew Developments and On-going Topics
•Shop Drawings required as part of Final Design documentation:
• CCASS evaluations to include Designer of Record (DOR) evaluations.
NAVFAC HAWAII
December 2010
Questions?NAVFAC Hawaii Capital Improvements
Design Division