FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 3X FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “C”WHEN PERFORMING A GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP.
RESULTS FOR: GRANULAR RECOVERY
14
:00
15
:00
7:0
0
8:0
0
9:0
0
10
:00
11
:00
12
:00
13
:00
6:0
0
5:0
0
4:0
0
3:0
0
2:0
0
1:0
0
0:0
0
1X 2X 3XNetBackup enables granular recovery through a single-pass backup.Competitor “C” requires additional coordination between admins to enable granular recovery.
4:46
15:24
SPEED TEST
00
:30
00
:15
00
:00
01
:15
01
:00
00
:45
02
:15
02
:00
01
:45
01
:30
1,000VMs
00:08
1X 5X 10X 15X
02:15
RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS
02:00
02:15
01:45
01:30
01:15
01:00
00:45
00:30
00:15
00:00
00:0500:16
00:32
01:12
02:15
00:05 00:06 00:08
100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs
Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). When testing crash consistent backups, NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 virtual machines in less than 9 minutes while Competitor “C” required over 2 hours.
NetBackup
Competitor “C”
FINDINGS:NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TOBACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.
COMPETITOR “C” REQUIRES OVER 2 HOURS TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT.
TOTA
L TI
ME
TO
CO
MPL
ETE
bac
kup
(Hou
rs:M
inut
es)
FOR ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTSSPEED TEST
(Hou
rs:M
inut
es)
00:08
SPEED
RESULTS FOR:HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP
9:00
11:00
13:00
15:00
7:00
5:00
3:00
1:00 0:25
2:52
0:43 1:112:51
6:16
14:32NetBackupCompetitor “C”
8:00
100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs
Zoom & Rotate
Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves you hours, especially in large-scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by Competitor "C" to perform the backups.
TOTA
L TI
ME
TO
CO
MPL
ETE
BA
CKU
P (H
ours
:Min
utes
)
15
:00
11
:00
13
:00
9:0
0
7:0
0
5:0
0
3:0
0
1:0
0
1,000VMs
1X 2X 3X 4X 5X
2:51
14:32
FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST
FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS 11 HOURS FASTER THANCOMPETITOR “C” WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS
(Hou
rs:M
inut
es)
Principled Technologies’ benchmark resultsshow that in a growing enterprise datacenter using VMware, NetBackup will scalesignificantly better than Competitor “C”.
NetBackup Competitor “C”RESULTS
HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY
ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS
GRANULAR RECOVERY
BACKUP & RECOVERYSCALABILITY BENCHMARK
SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD
“NetBackup IS THE MOSTSCALABLE BACKUP &
RECOVERY SOLUTION”
NetBackup
FASTER
0
24
6
810
1416
18
2022
12
4:46
15:24
3X
0
1
2
4
5
3
2:15
NetBackup
FASTER15X
0
2 4
6
810
1416
18
2022
12
2:51
1 4:32
NetBackup
FASTER3X
Want More Details on How Competitor C Fared Against NetBackup?
RESULTS
VMware Virtual Machines
Competitor “C”NetBackup
T E S T S P E R F O R M E D B YAn industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testingALL TESTS BASED ON:• Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions• Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs• Real-world Situations and Workloads
WHAT IS THE MOSTSCALABLE SOLUTION?
NetBackup COMPETITOR “C”
Principled®Technologies
VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTHDATA GROWTH
=X
LARGESCALEPROBLEM
Part# 21352225
© 2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
Updated 06/15
Download the Full Report Now
go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-c
