Art, the Self, and Society:
The Human Possibilities in John Dewey's Art as ExDerience
Rosa Jakubowia
A tbesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfüment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in Education
Department of Culture and Values in Education, Faculty of Education McGUl University
Montreal
Copyright @ Rosa Jakubowicz, July 1999
National Library Bibliothbque nationale du Canada
Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie !%!vices senrices bibliographiques 395 WeDlngton Slreet 365, nis Weiüngîon O(lawoON KlAON4 -ON K 1 A W CoMda Canada
The author has granted a non- exclusive licence allowing the National h i of Canada to reproduce, loan, distriiute or seil copies ofthis thesis in microfonn, paper or ekctronic formats.
The author retains omership of the copyright in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it niay be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's -ssion.
L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliotùèque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thèse sous la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électroniqne.
L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. Ni Ia thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprUnés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.
Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................ i
.. ...................................................................................... ............ ~esum6 .... 11
... ....................................................................................................... Dedication 111
........................................................................................... Acknowledgments iv
. . .............................................................................................................. Preface vu
Chapter 1 .
Chapter 2 .
Chapter 3 .
Chapter 4 .
........... ............................................................. [ntroduction ,. 1
.......... 1.1 Dewey's Definition of the Aesthetic Experience 3
1.2 Methodology .................................................................. 4
.......................................................... Review of the Literature 6
......................................... 2.1 Situating Dewey's Aesthetics 6
2.2 The individual in Dewey's Aesthetics ............................ 7
2.3 A SeIected Review: Current Writing About Dewey's Aesthetic Theory ........ 9
2.4 Negative Reactions to Dewey's Aesthetics ................... 14
2.5 Summary ........................................................................ 18
................................................. Theoretical Framework 1 9
........................................................................ 3.1 Summary 22
An Examination of Art as Exwrience: The Aesthetic Reievance ......................................................... 23
4.1 Dewey's Aesthetics ....................................................... 26
4.2 Dewey's Aesthetics Define Experience: ............................ The Significance of Aesthetic Living 29
....................................................................... 4.3 Summary 3 3
Chapter 5 . Dewey's View of Experience: A Multi-Faceted Event ............................................................. 35
5.1 The Contiguous Seif: ..................................... Elements of Dewey's Aesthetics 35
................................... 5.2 Shaping the SeIf as a Work of Art 36
5.3 Experience as a Multi-Faceted Event .............................. 37
Chapter 6 . Dewey's Concept of the Aesthetic: ..................................................... Cultural and Social Coaiext 42
6.1 The Social Significance of Aesthetic Living: ............................................................ Broad implication 44
6.2 Aesthetics for our Times ................................................... 49
Chapter 7 . Conciusion ................................................................................... 52
7.1 Implicarions for Education ............................................... 55
7.2 Suggested Areas for Further Research ............................. 57
7.3 Postscript ........................................................................ 3 8
. . Bibliography ........................................................................................................ 61
Abs tract
In the ongoing critical discourse about edu cation, the status of aesthetics has
always played second fiddle to the main arguments about what constitutes a relevant
curriculum. Aesthetics is seen by many educators as a frivolous experience-at best a
weak substitute for serious learning. This is the issue that Dewey addressed in his
philosophy of aesîhetics, and this is also where my focus lies in this thesis.
The thesis is a persona1 and theoreticai examination of John Dewey's aesthetic
philosophy as it is p~c ipa l l y expressed in Art as Ex~erience. In exploring the personai
implications of the aesthetic experience, the thesis investigates Dewey's argument that
the aesthetic is an inhinsic part of life. It demonstrates Dewey's emphasis on the
productive presence of the aesthetic in the culturai life of society.
Dans les critiques courantes sur la pedagogie, la présence de l'esthétique a toujour
pris une place inférieure. L'esthétique n'est pas pris au sirieux parmi les pédagogues.
Ceci est la problématique à laquelle Dewey s'addresse dans sa philosophie de
l'esthétique, et c'est aussi L'aspect qui a retenu notre attention dans ce mémoire.
Ce mémoire analyse l'aspect personnel et théorique de la philosophie esthétique
de John Dewey tel qu'on Ia retrouve dans son livre Art as Exmience. II étudie la théorie
de Dewey selon laquelle I'esthetique forme une partie intrinsèque de la vie. il explore les
implications personnelles de l'expérience esthétique. De plus le mémoire tente de
démontrer I'imprtance que Dewey accorde a fa présence productive de l'esthétique dans
la vie culturelle d'une société.
1 want to dedicate this thesis to so many people. For want of space 1 will limit my
self. To my mother Sarah because she never stopped believing in my intellectual prowess
and never stopped calling me "the little professor." And to Tim Locke who rerninded me
that 1 am just another one of those 'Dewey-eyed Scholars." I'm eternaiiy grateful to ail
of you for having had such faith in me.
Acknowledgments
Giving credit to those who have helped me is no easy task. How do 1 thank a
lifetime of interactions and influences that have led me to this point? Lfnot for al1 of you,
it seems to me that 1 wodd never have ventured this far.
I have worked on this thesis for the last two years under the tutelage of Dr.
Elizabeth Wood. She traveled dong with me through one of the most difficdt tasks 1
have ever undertaken. I'm not sure that 1 would have been able to stay the course and
complete this manuscript without her. Had she not been there to assuage my angst, I'm
not sure that my m I y character codd have managed. She showed me courtesy, respect,
and patience during the three years that she worked with me. She served as my muse.
She encouraged me when 1 suffered h m self-doubt. 1 am deeply grateful to her for her
presence and availability throughout this tirne.
1 have a simiiar long-standing debt ta Dr. White. He was the k t to admit me to
the Department and this ailowed me the opportunity and the time to pursue my Lifelong
goal of research and learning. He also exposed me to Dewey's aesthetic philosophy
through his seminars, and these provided me with the essence of my thesis. My thanks
go as weii to Dr. LeMaistre, Dr. Lawlor, Dr. Lin, Dr. Studham and Dr. Smith.
My teachers have been sign-posts dong the way. Their kindnesses served as
essentiai bridges on my intellectual joumey. Their steadfast presences and confirming
responses reinforced my self-esteem and inner strength. They drove me forwards with
their challenging mitiques and confirmed for me that being an intellectual could coincide
with my many other professionai afiïliations.
1 want to express my gratitude to Ti. Locke. Meeting him was a fortuitous act of
fate. His absotute professionalism enhanced my efforts h m the t h e that 1 engaged him
as my editor for this thesis. He semed as my coach and my strength, and 1 never doubted
the success of my efforts with him at my side.
If 1 have ornitteci anyone by name it is because their influence wasn't there.
Everyone 1 met dong the way had an impact on my evolutioa. 1 hope that what 1 have
written here reflects your stringent requirements for a rigomus scholarship.
My wonderfiil family cleared a path for me to foUow during these difficult,
complicated, and challenging moments. Without them I would never have reached my
goal of complethg tbis work.
It is to John Dewey that 1 owe my final thanks. His compIexity h u i a t e d my
search for answers to my questions about learning. There was aiways more to uncover in
his aesthetic, f i s work served as a positive and encomaging beacon of hope even m the
v
loneliest moments of my quest for answers. I never abandoneci my quest to master his
aesthetic philosophy, even when 1 came up against what seemed to me to be
insurmountable diaculties in integrating his meaning. I took courage fiom his theory
that because the aesthetic experience was a i i pervasive in culture, it was available to dl,
including me. As Dewey so aptiy wrote:
The biography of one who defines Iiis impressions is not located inside his
own body and mind. It is what it is because of the interactions with the
world outside, a world which in some of its aspects and phases is common
with that ofothers (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 305).
Thus the information settled itself in my brain (what psychologists refer to as
pattern recognition, pattern completion, pattern correction), and my creative imagination
kicked in to organize my thoughts into this semblance of coherent new connections, the
thesis that foiiows.
Preface
A thesis ofien becomes a process recordkg the time vent researching a
challenging problem. This thesis is a discourse on and record of my expIoration of the
themes, assumptions, definitions of terms figured in Dewey's series of lectures on the
phiiosophy of art.' It is also a reflection of who I am. It echoes the organic process that 1
experienced in order to arrive at this manuscript, the result of my stud?.
My interest in Dewey's aesthetic had twa sources. One was a dare; a careiess
comment made to me one day that insinuated 1 was somehow inadequatety prepared to
undertake any study of the aesthetic? That someone should dare cuntest my intelligence
so infuriated me that 1 twk up the chdlenge Iike a warrior to the chase. The 0 t h source
was my secret cornmitment to maintain art education as an essentid component of the
school curriculum.
'These lecmes were presented at Harvard University as a series of ten taIks in 193 1 and were later pubfished as Art as Experience in 1934.
'1 had pursueci many avenues in my search for anmers over the years. This time it was to understand why John Dewey's Art as Experience (1934) was of signiscance in Our contemporary worId.
31 am not aiming to debate the problems in EpistemoIogy so much as 1 am addressing the way that we approach ourselves, or as I have referred to it, how we refine our selves.
This cornmitment came about at a late age, long after 1 had already established my
professional credentials as a psychiatrie nurse. It happened because 1 6naily had the
opportunity to reexamine my own experience as an art educator in the aesthetic field.
Given the challenge, 1 plowed into Dewey's philosophy. The harder it was, the
more 1 stuck to the course. The thesis was an opportunity for me to prove to myself that 1
could undertake a subject at once unfamiliar yet dear to my heart. It gave me the
opportunity to reexamine those philosophical issues which so piqued my cwiosity.
Once the seeds were planted 1 was set on my course. It was a jmp-start, on the
hunch that somehow Dewey was the right thinker to study in order to gain insights
regarding questions about the role of individuals in determining their own lives within the
broader context of social issues.
Somehow, the more time 1 spent on Dewey the more I felt an afnnity between his
ideas and mine. My thesis became an opening, an invitation to me to expand my
knowledge base about the possibilities for Ieadng in the aesthetic. It became an attempt
to demonstrate that John Dewey's aesthetic philosophy addressed itseif to the issues
about the individual, not as a separate entity but as an intrinsic elememt in the aesthetic
process. That it had as much relevance to our cment concerns about the miprocal nature
between ourselves and the world around us conkned for me that Dewey was devant in
today's world of contemporary thinkers.
In this way, my thesis attempts to demonstrate that in some ways Dewey's
aesthetic theory is about the wiity of experiencean event in which the context of being is
reflected against the aesthetic.
Chapter One
Introduction
Demonstrating Dewey's congruity with ou . conternporary world is no easy task.
His approach to the subject of aesthetics is dry and scholarly (Alexander, 1987). Unlîke
today's fast-paced and entertainhg approach to scholarship (Postman, 1985), Dewey's
aesthetics does not offer any glitzy or fashionable slogans. In fact it is written as a dry
and old-fashioned senes of ideas about Ieaming and opportunities of learning; those tried
and true beliefs about people's ability to think and to learn if they are given the
opporhinities to have experiences that will expose them to stimuiating and new ideas.
1 have chosen to examine Dewey's concepts of the aesthetic experience through
the rnetaphor of the self as an ongoing work of art. At a tirne when issues of identity and
representation are at the center of our critical discourses (Kozol, 199 1), Dewey's aesthetic
philosophy provides some positive confirmation of our capacity to understand and to
reflect upon what we see in the world around us.
What 1 will try to show in my thesis is how Dewey utiiizes the metaphor of the
aesthetic as an active participle to explain his notion of the wmplementmity of the
complete experience in life; what 1 have caiied the metaphor of the self as the aesthetic
1
experience. This converts the self h m the passive to the alive state that can be reaIized
only in the continuous interaction of the individual with the surroundhg field of
experience: "In this process of intercourse, native capacities, which contain an eIements
of uniqueness, are transformed and become a self' (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 282).
Dewey's theory' suggests that this interactive event between me and the world
around changes me by the event of the interaction (Smith, 1990). My assumption is that
inasmuch as our world is a mass of these potentials for change, it is here that Dewey's
aesthetics matters most, both as a suggestion for recording the changes as weil as a
proposai for making some amenciments to the event that we refer to as our world.
I have chosen to see Dewey's aesthetics as a metaphor for the individual as the
aesthetic subject. in this way 1 try to show that Dewey's aesthetics is reflected onto a
human context of being and becoming. I mean by this that Dewey is suggesting a way
that the individual is better able to position herseifor himself in line with a world that
offers the individuai vast resources of opportunities and events which, aIthough present,
cm onIy be accessed if comprehended. The seifis viewed as the aesthetic experience; an
aesthetics that is reflected into the human context of being and becoming.
This is the core of John Dewey's thoughts in Art as Exmience as 1 am presenting
lA t h r y that challenges me to believe that I couid make something more of my experience than just be a passive recipient of experience.
them here. It is what fonns the central focus of my thesis, a focus that unites three of my
passions: learning, social justice, and art.
The conclusions that 1 have taken fiom Dewey's thinking in Art as Exuerience are
laden with the sense that the personal nature of the aesthetic experience cannot be far
removed fiom the politicai awareness ofwhat drives this society (Hamblen, 1987, p. 16).
This captures what 1 like to think of as the melduig of psyches into the wholeness of
being in a creative life-style that serves the universe.*
1.1 Dewey's Defimition of the Aesthetic Experience
Dewey defines the aesthetic experience as a enriched encounter between an
individuai and an event that "celebrates Me" (Dewey, 1934, p. 326; 1939, pp. 971,995).
He explains that the aesthetic is 'the most universal and freest fonn of communication"
(Dewey, 1934, p. 270). He desmies the aesthetic as a pervasive and purposefùi event
that characterizes "every intense experience of fiiendship and affection" (Dewey, 1934,
p.270). The aesthetic, as a perceptud experience, is a source for our enjoyment when it
stimulates our imaginations (Dewey, 1934, pp. 272,326; 1939, p. 971). As Dewey
articulates:
ZThis is my choice of terms.
Esthetic (sic) experience is a manifestation, a record and
celebratiun of the Life of a civilization, a means of
promoting its devebprnent, and is also the uItimate
judgement upon the quality of a civilization. For wbile it is
produced and is enjoyed by individuais, those individuals
are what they are in the content of their experience because
of the cuItures in which îhey participate (Dewey, 1934, p.
326).
From tbis Dewey contends that the aesthetic experience, as a subtle and intrinsic aspect of
our lives, should be cultivated so as to enrich ourseIves and ow world.
1.2 Methodology
This study will consist in a narrative exploration of John Dewey's Art as
Emenence. More than a theoreticai anaiysis, it is a meditative reflection the event of
creative hope for the individuai, an event of hope that 1 believe Dewey iinpiies and
intends by his discussion of the aesthetic experience.
1 intend to show th: for Dewey, the aesthetic represents the metaphor for aii
experience because, like experknce, the aesthetic fuses the objective and subjective
components of experience into Ieaming (Dewey, 1980 119345, p.281). In this way the
4
reciprocal nature of the interaction of our everyday needs with the world around us
is prefigured in Dewey's theory of the aesthetic experience (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 247),
and it is this figuration of personal and socid advancement in Art as ExDerience that
concems me.
My intentiou, in this thesis, is to discuss the theory as a distinctive option for a
richer personal life. To carry out this study, 1 wiIl begin with a seiected review of the
literature in order to situate the individuai within Dewey's aesthetic theory. The literature
review demonstrates the varied opinions elicited by his theory (Edman, 1964).
Proceeding with a sumrnary of what I understand to be Dewey's discussion of the
aesthetic experience, 1 will provide a theoreticai h e w o r k in order to establish a
context within which to clariQ Dewey's notion that we are able to understand the
aesthetic when we refi ect upon our raw sensations.
1 will follow with a discussion of the relevance of Dewey's aesthetic theory as
broadly assigning to the individual a boundless potentiai for experiential advance when
the aesthetic is also a part of this experience. Then 1 will discuss Dewey's text as a usefiil
social document. 1 believe that it can serve us today as a distinctive option for an active
and iife-Iong Ieaming experiencenot as some abstract or metaphytical polemic of the
spiritual but as an option in terms of the cultural significance of art. FiriaIIy I wiii
concIude my thesis with a discussion of the hplicatiom for education that Dewey's
aesthetic philosophy holds-both for leaming as weli as for fiiaher studies and research.
Chapter Two
Review of the Literature
2.1 Situating Dewey's AestheticsL
Very often writings in aesthetics ask traditional questions (Madeja, 1989). They
establish the questions why, what, when, who, how and ~ h e r e . ~ For example, why is art
what it is? What are the aesthetic and creative qualities that determine the worth or value
of art to an individual or a culture? Whose voice is expressed in the aesthetic object or in
the aesthetic experience? How does aesthetic discourse both affect and effect the artistic
process? Where does the merit of an aesthetic experience lie? 1s it in its descriptive or in
its anaiytic quaiities? They are questions about the fom and elements of the aesthetic
experience. To transpose these questions into my pivotal questions about what uitimately
matters in the leaming experience is to enter into what 1 think is Dewey's concern with
the aesthetic event.
'The reader is asked to note that whenever a gender designation occm in the foiiowing text, it is to be understood in the bivalent nature of mate and fernale as shehedher and he/his/hirn.
Wpling's most efficient "Six Serving Men".
Dewey takes the traditional approaches to aesthetic questions, and he entwines
this traditionai thinking into an inûicate and interactive process which he consolidates
into the aesthetics of experience as "a bond of union among men" (Dewey, 1980, 119341,
p. 328). As Shusterman (1992) describes it, he reconstructs the relationship between the
aesthetic and the individuai so that both become irreducible elements in the ongoing
episode of experience that constitutes our world (Shusterman, 1992, p. 5). The aesthetic
blends meaning so that experience can become purposefiil (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 334).
This is the way he weaves the aesthetic into the natirral relationship between a person and
his or her sunoundings by affLfmiflg the aesthetic as central to the developmental process
of the individuai (Roth, 1962, pp. 12- 13).
In posing the traditional aesthetic questions,3 Dewey takes a novel approach4
(Zeltner, 1975, p. 8) in that he underscores the individual experience as the complex
whole that operates in a symbiotic relationship with the surroundhg field. It is a
relationship that reflects, connects and associates the values and custorns of its associated
culture (Dewey, 1980 119341, pp. 44,179-180,196).
'Who is affected by the aesthetic? How does this effect occur? What is the aesthetic? Why is experience an aesthetic occurrence and when is experience an aesthetic event? Where does the aesthetic occurrence lead us?
What 1 have chosen to designate as an inward-focuseci aesthetics rather than the traditionai aesthetics which considers the aesthetic only in terms of its outward maniféstation, By this 1 mean an aesthetics that considers ody the transformation of the object-
2.2 The Individual in Dewey's Aestbetics
Dewey proposes that a person can apprehend the aesthetic through the experience
of nature (Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 18-1 9,133) despite social constraints or one's own
psychoIogical handicaps (Lukacs, 1972, p. 235; Gombrich, 1984, p. 55). It is an idea
offering everyone the opportunity to engage in a reflexive interactive event that expands
the possibilities of the individuai's repertoires of awareness (Berger & Luckmann, 1967
[1966]). It has the potentiai to lift us symboiicaily beyond the lirnits of our socially
defined imaginative constraints by assuring us that we are capable of doing so much more
with our tives than we are accustomed to believing about ourselvd (Lather, 1991, p.
156). This is what Rosenblatt (1978) cails the reflexive moment and to which Rich
(1994) ascribes an awakening force in the discovery of reality. Consequently, Dewey's
theory of the aesthetic experience is more than the psychological promise of inner
harmony and hlfillment (Dewey, 1980 119341, pp. 18-19). It becornes a counterpart to
the individuai's celebration of existence.
Dewey beiieves that there is a place for the aesthetic in out iives (Dewey, 1980
[1934], p. 179) because it offers us the possibility of having a reflexive experience (Hook,
1939, pp. 52; 76-77). There is positive growth in this reflexive experience, but it tums
into a negative expenence when instead of chaiienging one's energy, the experience
5Angst and dienation of the individuai is a defining characteristic of the Modem era. Some use the metaphor of a cracked vesse1 to refer to t!is human dilemma (Wiseman, 1981).
overwhelms and blocks it (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 167). It is this sense of the aesthetic
experience that Dewey weaves in and out of bis discussion in Art as Exkence.
In a methodical, meticdous, and elegant mimer, Dewey achowledges the self-
mediating capacity of people to enrich their lives by becoming alive to the lived
expenence (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 287). It is also in this way that Dewey tells us that
we become empowered as our sensibility and understanding, our conscious awareness of
our surroundings, expand the contexts and foundations of our knowledge. According to
Dewey: "Where there is thought, things present as signs or tokens of things not yet
expenenced" (Dewey, 1910, p. 4).
2.3 A Selected Review of Current Wnting About Dewey's Aesthetic Theory
Currently, John Dewey and his ideas are experiencing a revival, and foremost to
tiiis inquiry is the reassessment of bis aesthetic ideas (Shustman, 1992, p. 4). Kis eariy
acbowledgment of a self-mediating capacity of humans to take charge of their affairs is
contemporaneous with our current concerns about social integrity and stability (Taylor,
1989). Moreover, Dewey was sufnciently insightfûi to link this capacity with the
experience of the aesthetic.
Much of what is currently written about Dewey's aesthetic theory focuses on his
reflective insightfuiness about the relationship of the aesthetic to human existence
9
because of tfie positioning of thought: 'Where there is thought, things present as signs or
tokens of things not yet experienced" (Dewey, 1910, p. 4). Richard Shusterman defends
Dewey's current importance because his theory is "future-lookiug" and vaiorizes change
(Shusterman, 1997, p. 135). He places him within the philosophy of the experiential
where adaptation and adjusment of the self to the environment becornes the determinhg
element in human development (Shusteman, 1992, p. ix). He argues that Dewey,
correcthg the Kantian distinction that wouid circumscribe the aesthetic as simply beyond
the reai, decIares the centrality of art within the cuiturai Iife of society (Shusteman, 1992,
pp. 8-10):
Dewey was intent on making connections rather than distinctions. Be was
keen to connect aspects of human experience and activity which had been
divided by specialist, compartmwtalizing institutions in which such
fragmented disciplinary thinking is reiascribed and reinforcd
(Shusterman, 1992, p. 12).
Anothm recent theoist, Philip Zeltner, defines Dewey's aesthetic meaning in
terms of its wholeness as "the unity of experience" that '~mvides the basis for aesthetic
quaiity" [Zeitner, 1975, p. 24). That it h a p p a for its own sake tums synchronicity
(ZeItaer, 1975, p. 24) into an individuai's experientiai encounter. By promoting this
reading of Dewey's aesthetics, Zeltner reflects Dewey's intentional empiiasis on the
aesthetic occurrence.
These theorists agree that Dewey clearly argues for the experiential as the
aesthetic in itself and as an ongoing event-not as in completion but a s in a dialectical
resolution that is ongoing and not final. As Dewey argues: "The experience rnay be one
that is h d l to the world and its consummarion undesirable. But it has esthetic (sic)
quality ..." and promotes a further seeking out for more than what is known (Dewey, 1980
f 19341, p. 39). Furthemore, for theorists like Shusterman (1992) and Zeltner (1975)' the
very heart of Dewey's aesthetic emerges out of this experimental element of experience
that situates itseIf within nature. As he asserts in the following:
A nahualistic account of esthetic (sic) experience requires nature as its
ground and yet this ground is never quite expenenced as its ground ... Thus
art is a conversion of nature (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 274).
It follows b m this that for Dewey the aesthetic experience serves to stimulate a
firrther quest of knowledge in that it enriches the encounter between the person and the
object of culture in an oblique manner (Torgovnik, 1990). Zeltner (1975) assigns a
cogitively innovative element to Dewey's aesthetic when he argues the folIowing:
A person attempting to solve a difficuIt problem may expend great
energies upon a certain procedure for resolution. He may not soIve the
problem satisfactorily but the meanings that have come into being as a
result of his efforts denote the aesthetic quaiity of the experience (Zeltner,
1975, p. 24).
11
Thus any indifference or obstacle to this reality does not diminish the critical relevance of
the aesthetic as it operates in such a way as '90 integrate human knowledge and activity in
the general framework of reality and natural processes"(Schilpp, 1939, p. 597).
Thomas Aiexander a fbns that nothing Dewey writes can be separated fiom his
criticai culturai views. As Alexander maintains:
Nor should we forget that Dewey's continued involvement with the theory
of democratic life, ranging h m education and conduct to political theory,
conûibuted toward his theory of culture and art (Aiexander, 1987, p. 58).
What this implies is that Dewey's aesthetic reflecl his culturai philosophy, "the
possibility of the fiilfilling, shared life where human beings realize meaning and value in
the creative process" (Alexander, 1987, p. 60). Experience for Dewey becornes the socid
screen through which the individual's thought is transformeci through the intemal-
extemal admixture known as life (AIexander, 1987, p. 59):
Experience for him meant a process situated in a naturai environment,
mediated by a sociaiiy shared symboüc system, actively exploring and
cespouding to the ambiguities of the world by seeking to render the most
probIematic of them detemhte (AIexauder, 1987, p. xiii).
12
Ifwe follow Alexander's thinking on Dewey's aesthetic, we see îhat for Dewey the
aesthetic serves as one of the defining contexts through which a feeling Iife c m be lived
He afEms that Dewey's criticai cultural philosophy leads to a positive integration for the
individuai within Me's experience.
Roth (1962) points to another facet of Dewey's aesthetic notion of the
individual's experience. He says that it addresses a traditionai aesthetic philosophical
question that had always quaiified the object of the experience as being the principal
object of interest in the central question about the aesthetic expenence (Madeja, 1989, pp.
ix-xi). Roth (1962) claims that Dewey's philosophy assigns the significance of the
aesthetic to the individual having the experience and not to the object being experienced.
This he justifies in the following way:
In Dewey's framework, the individual is a person with capacities and
potentialities that far surpass those of other natural beings in the universe,
in whose hands is committed the awesome responsibility of finthering in a
corporate way the ongoing processes of the universe and especially of men
(Roth, 1962, p. 58).
The coroiiary to this lies m Marianna TorgoMik's (1990) assertion that Dewey's
philosophy of experience assumes an oblique sort of vaiues hction for the aesthetic
within human society. She says that Dewey alIows that we seek in the aesthetic
13
experience the means "to tell us how to live better, what it means to be human, to be male
or female, to be dive and looking for peace, or to accept death" (TorgoMik, 1990, pp.
247-248).
What these theorists assert about Dewey is that our fhdamental association with
our experience informs out- joumey through life:
Truth grafts itseifon previous truth, modifyïng it in the process just as
idiom gr& itself on previous idiom, and law on previous law ... What we
say about reality depends on the perspective into which we throw it
(Goodman, 1975, pp. 66-67).
What these thinkers conchde is that Dewey's theory is a positively uplifting theory in
which we are constantly engaged as we experience the event of life.
2.4 Negative Reactioos to Dewey's Aesthetics
1 have s h o w conternporary critical approval of Dewey's aesthetics, but there
were also those who criticized him "for mdue emphasis upon intelligence and the use of
the method of thinking" (Dewey, 1987 [1935], p. 504). In its tirne, Dewey's aesthetic
phiIosophy sustained intense scnrtiny. To show Dewey without the controversy
surrounding him is to present him in a false light.
14
There were searing critiques h m "those who opposed him [and] treated him as
someone who needed to be answered" (TiIes, 1992, p. l), those to whom Irwin Edman
referred as the "unsympathetic and sometimes obtuse critics" (Edman, 1976 [1950], p.
47). Dewey was cailed a "philistine" and criticized "for a nilgar concern with means
rather than ends" (Edman, 1976 [1950], p. 50).
D.W. Gotshalk did not understand how Dewey was able to acknowledge the
piurality of ways that the individual could approach the aesthetic and yet not
acknowledge the absolute impact that the aesthetic wouid have in the viewer's life
(Gotshaik, 1992 [1962], pp. 326-333). Undoubtedly, Gotshalk acknowledged that Dewey
depicted the aesthetic experience as a bio-social adjustment between the shared
experience of the individuai and her or his setting (Gotshalk, 1992 [1962], p. 300). But
the problem for Gotshalk was that Dewey's aesthetics were less than precise about the
unique meaning that the aesthetic held (Gotshalk, 1992 [1962], pp. 327,333). Since
Dewey took a relativistic stance towards the aesthetic, this became too confiising and
contradictory for Gotshalk (Gotshalk, 1992 [1962], pp. 323,325,327).
Patrick Romane11 also stmggled with what for hmi seemed to be unconventional
implications of Dewey's aesthetics, which he defined as being empiricai and pragrnatic
(RomanelI, 1992 [1948], p. 467). He descriied Dewey's argument as being an iilogical
and an ambiguous attempt to tesolve the unresoIvable about what wouid seem to be snch
an aesthetic conûïuiiction-the nature of the aesthetic and the product of the aesthetic, a
15
"mixture of his two implicit, if not completely explicit definitions of aesthetic subject-
matter" (Romaneu, 1992 [1948], pp. 465-467).
Benedetto Croce fadted Dewey's aesthetics because Dewey excluded the
metaphysical fiom the aesthetic experience as an intuitively spirituai event (Croce, 1948,
p. 206). Here too the cornplaint was focused on Dewey's failure to reinstate Kant's
absolute designation of the Platonic ideal. Such critics disapproved of Dewey's
unwillingness to concede that the aesthetic experience was exclusive of the context of the
culture of life. Other chtics attacked Dewey's physicai presentation of his aesthetic
theory ?
One of these faulüïnders was Stqhen Pepper (1953). He set out the analytic
weakness of Dewey's aesthetic philosophy in Dewey's use of the term "fusion." Pepper
decried the meaning of the aesthetic experience in Dewey's Art as Emerience as a
confusion and contradiction of the t em and rejected the entire thesis because "it is stili
not a very clearly defineci or indicated one" (Pepper, 1953, p. 171).
Dewey was denigrated as an adetician and he was denied any philosophicai
credibiIity @-s, 1972, pp. 325-33 1). George Boas fauited Dewey for bringing the
discussion of the aesthetic into the popular domain (Boas, 1953, pp. 178,182). It seemed
6By physical1 mean the actuai fonn of his presentation, the syntax and semantics of his arguments; how he said it and not whaî he said or why he said what he did
to rankfe some that Dewey had not retained art's esoteric exclusivity by separating the
aesthetic from the common arena of the plwality. As George Boas complained:
[It] clearly does not seem to have occurred to Dewey; that there is no
reason why any artist, whether painter or not, should communkate
anything other than his work or art to anyone eIse (Boas, 1953, p. 178).
Dewey called these detractors humdnun and limited in their imaginative
capacities in being unable to envision the aesthetic as being adjunctive to life (Van Meter
Ames, 1953, p. 146). He responded by clarifjhg that the significant contextual backbone
of his aesthetic philosophy was the reality of the presence of the aesthetic in the life of
people and their needs (Dewey, 1948, pp. 208,397).
Despite it dl, the philosophy that fused the aesthetic process into a reciprocity of
self and world could not be trivialized as some philosophical deviation (Alexander, 1992
[1979]) or as the ravings of a senile old man (Edman, 1976[1950], pp. 52-54; Vivas, 1992
[1938], p. 374). Nor could it be reduced to a debate over semantics, rhetoric, or syntax
(Vivas, 1992 [1938]; BeardsIey, 1969): 'Though Dewey wrote in his native tongue, he
has not been conspicuously successful in making himseifunderstood" (Kaplan, 1987
[1934], p. m. This situation challenged the view that it was possible, given the right
conditions, that the aesthetic notions of any philosopher could aIso be understood by
many (Demis, 1972, p. 325).
17
2.5 Summary
In this chapter 1 introduced my perspective on Dewey's philosophy of the
aesthetic as he wrote it in Art as Emenence. 1 suggested Dewey's theory of the aesthetic
experience presents the possibilities and the promise that, given the opportunity, the
individual can encounter an intrinsically reflective process that Dewey referred to as the
aesthetic expenence. It is a concept about the interactive operation that occurs in nature
as the reflexive intersection between the individual and the social construction cailed
reality (Hicban, 1998, p. 92).
Following that 1 presented an overview of selected literature, providing examples
of arguments both favouring and opposing Dewey's work. In the next chapter 1 will
provide the theoretical h e w o r k of rny study.
Chapter Three
Theoretical Framework
in my opening chapters, 1 briefly introduced the personal aspect of John Dewey's
aesthetic pbilosophy. in this chapter I wiI1 l in . this to the theoretical framework which,
in my view, supports Dewey's aesîhetic as he dehes it in Art as Exmience.
The world is, according to Dewey, what we make of it (Dewey, 1980 [I934], p.
152- 154). Underpinning this serendipitous event is an aesthetically funded experience
that is artisticdly shaped (Alexander, 1987, p. xii). It can be descriied as the push and
pull of existence as life presents itself in a series of shaping experiences, a continua1
interplay of adaptation {Jackson, 1998, p. 170; Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 150). To this
pmess and perception of experience Dewey couples the aesthetic as a shaping and
re%g element within human experience, an efement that invites the individual to
pursue a place for himself or herseif in the experiential contingency of life, given tbat
even the weakest individual h d s some sort of strength in the aesthetic (Dewey, 1980
[1934]), pp. 45,134,210). And he specines further by qyoting Tennyson's UIysses:
Yet ali experience is an arch wherethro'
Gleams that untravell'd worId whose margin fades
For ever and for ever when 1 move (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 193)-
19
From this we c m see that Dewey is proposing a functional aesthetic in his
paradigm of the transformable exchange that occurs as we humans confinnt our
surroundings (Hickman, 1998, p. 92). He also sets out a step-by-step guide for having the
experience, which he assures us is innate to experience and understanding. In this way
Dewey provides the tools for understanding how to appreciate our lived experience as
aesthetically tived. It seems implicit that for the individual, the aesthetic serves as a
vehicle by which we can acquire the power to challenge our contextuai assumptions.
What is Ieamed is meaçured and considered as a matter of form with a hc t ion and a
purpose:
Interaction of the environment with the organism is the source, direct or
indirect, of ail experience and from the environment corne those checks,
resistances, Merances, equilibria, which when they meet with the
energies of the organism in appropriate ways constitute form (Dewey,
1980 [1934], pp. 146- 147).
This is the integrating force of Dewey's aesthetic: its capacity to blend the
discreet forces of the person into the continuous event of life, into the transformation of
the aesthetic experience (Shusterman, 1992, p. 140). Dewey refers to this transformation
as a modification of the self in the process of becoming (Dewey, 1980 [t934], p. 285). It
can also be seen as an event of self-actuaiization or seIf-realization. The process
underscores my thesis that Dewey's aesîhetic presents the possibility for experientiai
20
advance (Bernstein, 1971, p. 21 l), providing that a meaus for personal transformation is
aiso present.' This is what Rosenblatt refers to as a transactionai event (Rosenblatt, 197%
p. ix) that casts a simultaneous reciprocity of events through the aesthetic and not some
other unique expenence (Bernstein, 1971, p. 212). This presents a constant possibility in
the recurrent transaction that fünctions as life. The shape of possibility that the exchange
effects acts as a refinishing device within the reciprocd event that causes a transformation
to occur in experience. Like those unavoidable life's events coinciding with chaos,
conflict, and resistance-or with beauty, order and fonn-the aesthetic is also foremost in
the individual's experience.
Dewey endorses the aesthetic as an essentid component within the constnicts of
our mass reality and at the same t h e assigns to the individuai the metaphor for the
aesthetic expenence, the-work-of-iu2-in-progress>2 something that is more than just any
haphazard cultivation of the individual. This functiona13 aesthetic is a paradigm for the
'This personal transformation is what 1 mean by my use of the tenn self-cefinement. In the field of personality theory there are various descriptions clari&ing what 1 mean by my titIe "self-refinement." Rather than emphasize the psychological transformations connoted by the terms self-actualization or self-realization, I have felt it more appropriate to my purpose to keep the expression "self-refinement," which seems to me to suggest the aesthetic as a forming or scuiptural term; hence, my choice of the term "seIf-refinement".
IMy choice of expression.
31n our society there are my-riad ways for self-cuItivation or as is popuhriy refened to self-heIp1self-improvement. Our way of referring to these advocates are as gurus of the New Age. Many different suggestions are offered that promote individual cultivation. Among hem are the use of drugs, sex, pIastic surgery, diet, exercise, religion, What Dewey suggests is the active cultivation of the mind, This stimulahg activity, he contends, will promote an increased interest of the individual in his or her He.
rdationship of the person to ber or his environment in a continwus recreation of the
experience of learning, with the possibüities of adaptation and change. What Dewey
suggests is the active cdtivation of the mind. In the moments of thinking and feeling,
this aesthetic attention, even of the ordinary, cm heighten one's understanding of the
means by which we arrive at this discursive exchange of consmcted meaning.
The experience becornes the "as i f ' (Gordon, 1961, p. 37) moment as the aesthetic
encounter takes on the strength of the individuai's weaving (RosenbIatt, 1978, p. ix) of
the transaction in the event. Far greater than just the ordinary occurrence, the constnict of
f o m and arrangement in the aesthetic experience causes a transformation to occur
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 285).
3.1 Summary
This chapter presented the theoreticd Eramework which supports my reading of
John Dewey's aesthetic theory. in the next chapter 1 wiil explore the personal nature and
implications of this theory by exaxnining the aesthetic relevarice of Dewey's text.
Chapter Four
An Examination of the Aesthetic Relevance of Dewey's Art as Ex~erience
Thus far, 1 have presented what 1 understand to be the significant thnist of John
Dewey's philosophy, narnely that it is an aesthetic which focuses on the individuai's role
in experience as a persona1 event. In this chapter 1 will examine the relevance of this
aesthetic.
1 understand Art as a social document. Aithough it can be anaiyzed
as an absûact or metaphysical debate of the spirit of art, 1 have chosen to assess it as a
metaphor for rehning the self within our social fabric. 1 understand Art as Exuerience to
stand for the cohesiveness and wholeness of being, through the symbotic argument about
the aesthetic in terms of its cultural significance in the individual's experience. The
refinement of the self depends as much on what is inside us as it does on what experience
confiants us (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 251). The implications of this for the aesthetic
experience is that there are reflexive interactions between the individual and the event
(Rosenblatt, 1978), interactions that Iead to fiiaher interactions in a process of becoming
wide-awake to this worid (Greene, 1995, p. 4). As 1 descn'bed it in Chapter 2, it is the
23
obtique inter-juncture between the experience of the event and the individuai. It is the
confluence between what is and what is possible that rqresents the juncture between the
lived life and the aesthetically lived life as it is extended into a fiirther seekiag of
experience.
When 1 began studying Art as Exuerience, 1 approached it as an iconography of
art, or the very least, a discussion of the psychology of the imaginative in art. Some
chapters analyzed the formal structures of paintings and ~cuIpture,~ and Dewey touched
on the psychology of creativity and its aspects in the imagination,' But my intuition told
me that it was not enough to view the work as a discussion of the formal elements of art.
It seemed to me that the text, rather than a document entirely concemed with the fonn of
art, elaborated a discussion of what was valuable in art. As Alexander (1987) explained:
It represents the possibility of the fulfilling, shared life
where human beings realize meaning and vaiue in the
creative process of intelligent growth (Alexander, 1987, p.
60).
'In Dewey's Art as Experience, Chapters iV-X address the formal elements and aspects of art like the subjects of art, the methods, materiais and the mediums used to ma t e the work of art.
'In Dewey's Art as Exaerience, Chapters X & XIT address the current concerns about foms of communication and their symbolic relevance to the human expexience.
Dewey designates to the aesthetic this social purpose as part of the "intimate.,.meaning of
group life ... with daily iife...[reflecting] the motions and ideas that are associated with the
chief institutions of social life9'@ewey, 1980 [1934], p. 7). He does not believe that
aesthetic appreciation is some rarefied and excepiionai experience of the elitist fewe3 He
argues that the aesthetic is as innate to human existence as any 0 t h ordinary event
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 144). It cm be had by anyone and anywhere. As Dewey
suggests:
the traits, the characteristics of the human experience that
have the quality that for iack of any 0 t h name we cal1 the
esthetic (sic)..,what it is that you and 1 and anybody that has
any kind of esthetic (sic) appreciation goes through
(Dewey, 1988, pp. 358-359).
Once 1 understood Dewey's argument as one concernecl with the relevance of the
aesthetic in the individual's milieu, 1 realized that it had profound social and cultural
implications in the context of the relevance of the everyday'. Richard Shusterman
descnlbes this as what is "revoIutionary" about Dewey's aesthetics (1992, p. ix). Not only
3Aithough 1 am focusing on the aesthetic aspect in Art as Experience, culture and pragmatism are continuaiiy interwoven and can not be distinctly separated.
I have referred to this as the social signincance of aesthetic living. This question, however, lies beyond the parameters of the present study, which is Iimited to examinhg the implications of the aesthetic for the individuai.
was Dewey anaIyziug the fonnal elements of the aesthetic, but he was also giving these
forma1 qualities a social context and cdtural relevance in the human experience. It was a
means to challenge those assumptions that were current at the time (Riis, 1901). The
cornplexit. of the society and its hctioning provideci the backdrop for Dewey's theory
that the aesthetic experience couid provide the context for change and learning.
4.1 Dewey's Aesthetics
The contribution of John Dewey's aesthetic theory lies in the emphasis he places
on it in terms of daily life. Dewey is removing the authority of the aesthetic fiom the
connaisseur and bringing it back to the individual. He argues that the aesthetic
experience is open to dl:
If we becorne more on the lookout for the moments of this kind of
experience we do not think of thcm as experiences we have to have by
going to certain places, but that we may have at any time of day in
comection with any, not everyone, but with contacts with objects, scenes,
persons that are not in any way Iabeled to be works of fine art (Dewey,
1988, pp. 358-359).
Here Dewey is suggesting that the experientid aliows one to play a part in the
connectedness between ourselves, the viewer and the abject or event discernai. What
26
this means is that anyone can experience the aesthetic given the human capacity for
thinking and for reasoning. It is not, accordhg to Dewey, something of a rarefieci
encounter that only a few individuds c m ever hope to understand.
Dewey writes that we mate ourselves in the objects we make (or experience) and
that sometimes we change in the process of creating (or expenencing) these objects. He
describes it as an excursion that "creates new sensitivities that in time absorb what was
aiien and naturalize it within direct experience" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 282). Dewey
argues the foiiowing: ''1 think, again, that if we look at the whole matter more h m the
standpoint of what we do or what we feel and undergo we are less likely to get pettifid
by the old forms" (Dewey, 1988, p. 361). Its necessity lies in the compelling component
of nature and of our wodds. That despite the constricting definitions of any social reality
enclosing us, it demands a response and, if one is not forthcoming, it supplies the
feedback whether we achowledge this or not. In fact Dewey is simply reassuring us that
we can understand the contents of our lived expenences, ergo, manage our iives when he
says: "The sense of relation between nature and man in some form has always been the
actuating spirit of art" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 339). And because we can do this the
aesthetic is just another facet of this dimension of human growth-a gmwth that thrives
within the chaos and unpredictability of reciprocal responses to al1 that surrounds and
envelopes us.
Seeing the broder implications of Dewey's aesîhetic brhgs us nght back to the
culturaI ramifications of a phiIosophy of the aesîhetic of culture where change is the
means for the inquiry into and criticism of the everyday experience which implodes on all
of us, given that reality is what it is. Dewey acknowledges the imperfections in human
civilization and agrees that Iife as reflected in the aesthetic (as every other element in
reality) exists in and emerges out of dissension and conflict:
Moreover, resistance and conflict have always been factors
in generating art; and they are, as we have seen, a necessary
part of artistic form. Neither a world wholly obdurate and
sullen in the face of man nor one so congenial to his wishes
that it gratifies al1 desire is a world in which art can arise
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 339).
Here Dewey is chiding those peopte who impose their cnteria of the aesthetic: "Anything
that hardens an expenence in certain Iines as if they were the proper lines in which it
should run becomes a burial to a genuine esthetic (sic) experience" (Dewey, 1988, p.
362). He insists that the reciprocal connectedness between the individuai and her or his
environment s h i h between the ''personal act" and the "objective result" of the dialectic
between life and the aesthetic (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 82).
ifwe entertain this phiIosophy of the aesthetic we enter into an understanding of
ourselves in our immediate surroundïngs as the willfùi participants of an ongoing process,
which demands our input and our active participation in a process not always cornfortable
28
or beneficial to our immediate need for positive confirmation or for gratification. In other
words, the distinction between me and you evaporates into a mutuai reciprocity of how
you and 1 interact.
4.2 Dewey's Aesthetics Define Experience: The Siguificame of Aesthetic Living
The greatest insight that Dewey has about the aesthetic is that it can hold a
significance for the individual beyond itselfas an object ofmaterid value. By this he
challenges our cornplacent assumptions that the aesthetic expenence is only about the
products outside ourselves, in any culturd setting. He suggests that the intrinsic worth of
the aesthetic experience lies within the individual, that its worth is more within the
process than just in the value of art as a materid product. It becomes a necessary
presence in the cultural evolution ofany society. It causes an oblique sort of equalization
to occur within the dynamic of human experience (TorgoMik, 1990). This broadly
implies that some movement cm occtr within our iives. Dewey holds that experience is:
a matter of the interaction of the artistic product with the self. . . It
changes with the same person at dament times as he b ~ g s something
mereut to the work. . . . So far as in each case there is an ordered
movement of the matter of experience to a fiilfiIlment, there is a dominant
esthetic (sic) quality (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 33 1).
He expands the tradition of formai outboks on aesthetics by conuecting it to its cultural
coniext. He argues that the segregation of the arts h m the experience of the popdation
leads to a divisive elitism in society (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 10). He descnies this as
'me story of the severance and the final sharp opposition of the usehl and the he":
The story of the severance and h a 1 sharp opposition of the
useful and the h e is the history of that indusûid
developrnent through which so much of production has
becorne a form of postponed living and so much of
consurnption a superimposed enjoyment of the bits of the
labor of others (Dewey, 1980 [1934j, p. 27).
Dewey beiiwes that this dienation of experience Ieads to the greatest dangers for a
society when its individuals beiieve that nothing W e r can be gained h m the
possibilities for the aesthetic experience, and then proceed to curtail it (Dewey, 1980
[1934], pp. 343-344). As Dewey argues, how we live determines the success or failure
of our society:
Dewey took the daily experience of individuals more seriously than he
took anything else, and he ultimatety evduated everytbing as an
instnrment for the enrichment of such experieuce ( F d e I , 1963 [1957], p.
156).
30
Dewey never ceases to offer the individuai the challenge of change through the aesthetic
experieace. He describes the aesthetic as a useful adjunct within our iives:
It is a matter of commIinication and participation in values
of life by means of the imagination, and works of art are the
most intimate and energetic means of aiding individuals to
share in the arts of living (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 336).
This experience-as-transaction becornes a heuristic device for the process of doing
and undergoing: "a highly developed form of the active dation between an organism
and its environment, a relation whereby change is effected" (Copleston, 1966, p. 358).
Underpinning the experience is the complex whole of the person's quest through Me, a
quest that Dewey acknowledges is circumsmid by the cdture and its values (Dewey,
1980 [1934], pp. 196-197). This symbolic mediation between the person and the
environment is understoud by Dewey to represent the aesthetic moment in the interval of
time and existence. This flow of energy hking the individuai to the enviromnent cm
occur in the experiential interchange that Dewey dehes as the aesthetic. As Dewey
proposes it:
ifwe approach the matter h m our end we get a more flexible approach
and one that is more inclusive, one that is more tolefaflt . - - it tends to
3 1
enlarge us. . . . it frees us and heIps us drop off some of the undue timidity
or awe with which many people feel that works of art ought to be
approached (Dewey, 1988 [1938], p. 357).
Experiencing the aesthetic aIIows the individuai to flower "because] experience is the
fulfillment of an organism in its sûuggles and achievements in a world of things, it is art
in gem" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. t 9). in this way the aesthetic celebrates human
existence and complements it: "art celebrates with pecu1ia.r intensity the moments in
which the past reinforces the present and in which the future is a quickening of what now
is" (Dewey, 1930 [1934], p. 18).
A phenornenon emerges, with the above in view, when we realize that what
Dewey means by the aesthetic impIies an observationai attentiveness to our swroundings
through the cornmon experience of the ordinary. In Dewey' view:
the traits, the characteristics of the human experience that have the quaiity
that for lack of any other name we caU the esthetic (sic) . . . what a human
being undergoes and enjoys when he is in the presence of one of the works
of art, in its presence not merely physicaiiy but with his make-up, with his
full mind and feeling- . - Jt recognizes that we may have this experience in
the presence of aU kinds of things. . . ..Ifwe becorne more on the Iookout
for the moments of this kind of experience we do not tEMk of them as
experiences we have to have by going to certain places, but that we may
have at any tirne of &y . . . with contacts with objects, scenes, persons that
are not in any way labeled to be works of fine art (Dewey, 1988 [1938],
pp. 358-359).
ui this way the aesthetic experience becomes the lived experience in its myriad diversity
and facets. The aesthetic is not seen as an isolated and separated experience but as a
natural and intrinsic element with human culture. There c m hardly be a more attainable
resource that yet has been kept in such scarce availability. Its advantage transcends any
market value that might be ascribed to the aesthetic or to experience. Dewey emphasizes
the civilizing usefulness of art in the following m m e r
instruction in the arts of Iife is sornething other than conveying
information about them. It is a matter of communication and participation
in values of life by means of the imagination and works of art are the most
intirnate and energetic means of aiding individuais to share in the arts of
living (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 336).
Not only does the medium become the message as a tool for communication, but it aIso
carries dong with it various possibilities leading to firrther cornmimication.
4.3 Summary
As 1 have tried to show in this chapter, the cementhg force of the aesthetic for
Dewey is its capacity to blend the discrete into the continuous, because of its universaiïty
as a symbol system (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 335). Art is "a more universai mode of
language," and its evocative nature can transcend the baniers of human communication
and thus serve as a bonding and bridging device in the babel of conventional
misunderstandings. In this chapter 1 have discussed Dewey's concept of the experience
of the aesthetic so as to demonstrate its contemporary relevance. The aspects of his
theory that i have highlighted are, 1 believe, central to Dewey's philosophical approach to
the aesthetic question. With these issues in mind, in the next chapters 1 expand upon the
contemporary cultural and social implications of Dewey's aesthetic.
Chapter Five
Dewey's View of Experience: A Multi-faceted Event
5.1 The Contiguous Self: EIements of Dewey's Aesthetics
in Chapters 3 and 4,1 demonstrated the theoreticai underpinnings to my
contention that the individuai is intrinsic to Dewey's theory of the aesthetic experience.
With this focus in mind, 1 will further examine the self as it is placed within Dewey's
paradigrn of the aesthetic experience.
To the fractured and alienated individuai we are in life, Dewey offes an
aiternative, a more rneaningful existence. As Dewey outlines in his text (1980 [1934]),
experience and identity are inevitably quaiified by our integration of the cognitive,
intellectual, social and aesthetic elements in culture:
We are interconnected with our surroundings whether or not we
acknowledge this ... As nature presents us with challenges at each new cycle
of our development we take up the challenge and make our adaptations to
our best advantage (Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 147-148).
A vision of possibilities for the individuai drives Dewey's aesthetics as he
advances the argument that the individual is an active participant in her or his experience
of life. He takes the discussion of knowledge acquisition and literacy through the
aesthetic into the individual realm of self-determination and refinement in an account of
the possibilities of what lies beyond the moving horizon of our cultural encounters
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 193-195). This makes Art as Exoerience highly relevant today
in that it serves as a cultural guide, defining Our interrelationships and activities within
the constellations of our communities (Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 82-83; p. 212).
5.2 Shaping the Self as a Work of Art
Dewey argues that the contiguous self is one that is actively engaged in the
interactive possibilities of life:
if we approach the matter from our end we get a more flexible approach
and one that is more inclusive, one that is more tolerant . . . it tends to
enlarge us . . . it frees us and helps us &op off some of the undue timidity
or awe with wtiich many people feel that works of art ought to be
approached (Dewey, 1988 119381, pp. 359-360).
He maintains by this that we achieve knowledge not because it is dictated to us but
because we locate ourselves through our experiences, "because of the interactions with
the world outside . . . which in some of irs aspects and phases is common with that of
others" (Dewey, 1980 f 19341, p. 305). Dewey's elaboration of the aesthetic gives us a
way of knowing that has the most possibfities for "more empowering ways of knowing"
(Lather, 199 1, p. 85). He offers a rneaningful methodology without a concomitant
trivialization of knowledge acquisition associated with passive learning. As Dewey
argues:
In order to understand the esthetic (sic) in its ultimate and approved forms,
one must begin with it in the raw; in the events and scenes that hoId the
attentive eye and ear of man, arousing his interest and affording him
enjoyment as he looks and Iistens . . . . He does not remain a cold spectator
. . . The reader should be carried forward, not merely or chiefiy by the
mechanical impulse of curiosity, not by a restless desire to anive at the
final solution, but by the pleasurable activity of the journey itself (Dewey,
1980 [1934], pp. 4-5).
53 Experience as a Mula'-Faceîed Event
Dewey implies that the aesthetic experience is a multi-faceted event, It is not
Iimited to "the cultivated with access to these aesthetic expetiences in select places"
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 6). Dewey contends that the aesthetic can be had by anyone if
one but feels, sees, and srneils the present. He States that any philosophy that does not Iay
such a foundation for praxis is deficient:
. . . sterilized unless it makes us aware of the function of art
in relation to other modes of experience, and unless it
indicates why this function is so inadequately realized, and
unless it suggests the conditions under which the office
would be successfulIy performed @ewey, 1980 [1934], p.
12).
The aesthetic experience becornes the "situated gaze" that is located in life and not kept
rernote (Featherstone, 1997 [1995], p. 34; Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 7). The experience
becomes rooted in the natural needs, constitution, and activities that constitute the
aesthetic expression as an adjustment and adaptation that is characteristic of Iife in
generd. Dewey describes this in the following:
Through art, meanings of objects that are otherwise dumb, inchoate,
restricted, and resisted are clarified and concentrated, and not by thought
working laboriously upon them, not by escape into a world of mere sense,
but by creation of a new experience . . . matter ordered through fonn
(Dewey, 1980 119341, p. 133).
Expression becomes a personal act of existence in the on-going event caiied time. Dewey
promotes a theory based in the strength of enhanced perception. He emphasizes the
possibilities that emerge when an active awareness or perception is developed:
No longer neuually aimed at faithfully representing the
concepts it examines ... [our active awareness is] engaged in
reshaping them to serve us better . . . the ultimate goal is
not knowledge but improved experience (Shusterman,
1992, p. viii).
It is in fact the capricious nature of the human being that enables Dewey's
rnethodology to penneate acquisition of knowledge through education in the aesthetic
object, without a guaranteed outcome. Maxine Greene describes this as the contingencies
of failible perception:
No form of literacy is taught for its own sake. Like verbaI
and numericai literacy, aesthetic Iiteracy provides
acquaintance with specifiable languages, as it does with
particular ways of perceiving and imagining. Not only rnay
this lead to heightened awareness of actuaI works; it may
bring about an enriched acquaintance with the appearances
of things (and the feel and the sound), even as it enlarges
the symboiic repertoh needed for thinking about the
world and expressing what is thought (Greene, 1981, 120.
The muIti-faceted nature of experience brought about through the "gaze" offers us a
means of active engagement witfi our wor1ds of rneanings:
Humanism posits the subject as an autonomous individual
capable of full consciousness and endowed with a stable
'self constituted by a set of static characteristics such as
sex, class, race, sexual orientation. Such a subject has been
at the heart of the Enlighrenment project of progress via
education. reflexive rationality, and human agency (Lather,
199 1, p. 5).
What is experienced can constitute a possibility for enhanced awareness as a
"rnirrof' {Foucault, 1984, p. 153) of self-reflection through this nebulous rnorphoiogy
that Dewey refers ro as the " r d experience . . . compIete in itself, standing out because
marked out from what went before and what came aftei' (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 36).
The individual is not isolated (Seigfned, 1991, p. 9), and the perceiving subject acquires
the possibility of an interactive exchange within the context of the aesthetic experience on
the "horizon of saciai p d s " (Seigiied, 1991, p. 9). AIert to the constructive
possibilities for human civilization, Dewey emphasizes the cognitive benefits that the
aesthetic experience is likeIy to bring as he establishes the paradigm sh i f i in bis focus on
the importance of the aesthetic fieId in the individuai's ordinary experience.
in this chapter I have emphasized the multiple connotations of Dewey's theory of
the aesthetic experience as an adjunctive element to our pool of referential knowledge. 1
have also presented Dewey's argument that this adjunct serves as a substantive rdective
presence (Sleeper, 1986, p. 193). 1 have established that Dewey integrates a pluraiity of
possibilities out of the experience that merges the aesthetic with the everyday by
demonstrating that Dewey's aesthetic embodies a multiplicity of views that through the
aesthetic experience bring the chdlenge of change to the individual, in the next chapter. I
will examine the culturai implications of John Dewey's aesthetic philosophy, not only as
it affects the individual but also as it offers a rnulti-varied possibility that extends beyond
the icdividual to society.
Chapter Six
Dewey's Concept of the Aesthetic: The Culturai and Social Context
Whereas in the preceding chapters 1 concentrated on Dewey's discussion of his
aesthetic theory in relation to the individual, in this chapter 1 focus on the cultural
implications of his theory.
As 1 argued in Chapter 4, the refinement of the self depends as much on what is
inside us as it does on what experience confronts us (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 251). This
acknowledges the self-rnediating capacity of individuals to become active participants in
the discursive exchange with their environments so as to consûuct meanings for
themselves (Jackson, 1998, p. xiv). This conception of the interactive process assures us
that we are more than passive recipients of the events around us.
For John Dewey the aesthetic as lived experience represents the intelligently lived
life as a possibility for self-realization (Alexander, 1987, p. 60). The aesthetic is
interwoven with the social fabric and facilitates an interconnectedness between ourselves
and our surroundings (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 144). In fact, Dewey argues, we can
maintain a sense of relation between ourselves and our milieus throngh the actuating
spirit of the aesthetic (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 339). It cushions us within the chaos and
unpredictability that comprises this imperfect world.
Dewey seems to support such a view when he points out that the aesthetic work
and by extension the aesthetic expenence emerges out of this excitement:
Moreover, resistance and conflict have always been factors in generating
art; and they are, as we have seen a necessary part of artistic form. Neither
a world wholly obdurate and d e n in the face of man nor one so
congeniai to his wishes that it gratifies al1 desire is a world in which art
can arise (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 339).
This draws attention to the dialectical reciprocity between personai experience and the
aesthetic event, one that surges into the cultural as an aesthetic occurrence (Dewey, 1980
[1934], p. 82).
6.1 The Social Siwcance of Aesthetic Living: Broad Implications
What drives Dewey's thinking is "its future-Iooking attitude and valorization of
change" within the aesthetics of experience (Shusterman, 1997, p. 135). That Dewey
amibes to the aesthetic a universa1 form of communication (Dewey, 1980, [1934], p-
270) gives it a bridging effect that extends the individual's power to communicate beyond
a narrowIy defined sphere. Dewey's aesthetic theory suggests that every living thing is
denved From and related to every other living thing (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p.204) in a
reciprocal event that o r m e s itself into an intensified association. It is based in the
acknowledgment that the aesthetic bas meaning beyond individual cultural ciifferences
and that the personal is an interactive event of politicai dimensions (Hurwitz et al, 2984,
p. 7; Hamblen, 1987, p. 16)-what Van Meter Ames calls Dewey's social emphasis, in
that "art changes society by changing man" (Van Meter Ames, 1953, pp. 160-161). This
moves Dewey's aesthetic into the contemprary world (Shusterman, 1992, p. 10;
Weintraub, 1996, p. 256), a world that is defined by continual transformations and
accommodations.
These metamorphoses occur as sweeping socid changes and technologicaI
transformations influence the adaptations of individuais and cultures (Hickman, 1998, p.
82). The rneans for such adaptations Iie in 'We action and its consequences," the
diaiecticai "relationship" that gives the experience its distinguishing quaiities (Dewey,
1980 (19341, p. 44). Dewey substantiates this position through a view of the aesthetic
experience that unifies and breaks through individual differences while at the sarne time
enriching each individual. Invin Edman expounds this aspect of Dewey's theory in the
following passage:
Ail thinking is art. . . Art is the name for that deliberate process by which
experience, out of its own fertilities and potentiaiities, renders itself more
perspicuous, more ordered, and more certain ... It is that conscious
technique by which, out of some uncertainty and aisis, desired goods, fmt
foreseen as ideai possibiIities, the self-suggesting hopes of an imperfect
present, are achieved and s tab ihd @hm, 1929, p. 124).
This is to Say that we project our values or transfer our feelings into the immediate
experience as a bridge for our differences (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 249). Raymond Firth
(1963 [1951]) describes this process as an innate sense of the aesthetic which swells
within us as the "special kinds of reactions and evaiuations based on feeking tones which
we cal1 aesthetic (Firth, 1963 [1951], p. 156). Dewey describes this need as human
adapration-the adjustment to Me's contingencies once the aesthetic becomes the protean
mechanism out of which this transformation occurs. As Dewey asserts in the following
passage:
Life grows when a temporary failing out is a transition to a more extensive
balance of the energies of the organism with those of the conditions under
which it Iives. These biologicaI cornmonplaces are something more than
that and they reach to the roots of the esthetic (sic) in experience (Dewey,
1980 [1934], p. 14).
By making the aesthetic foundational to human experience, Dewey provides a theoreticai
method for advancing a culture in a competent manner because his aesthetic mots "the
natural need, constitution, and activities of the human organism" (Shusterman, 1992, p.
6). It also organizes cultural differences into a corridor of communication that alIows for
difference (Dewey, 980 [1934], p. 33 1).
In this way the aesthetic becomes for Dewey a way to address the diiernma of
45
human differences. The incompleteness of the world gives our experience, in Dewey's
view of the aesthetic, "a combination of movement and culmination of breaks and
reunions" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 17). As such, it serves to demystiQ an aspect of
culture that converges into a maze of nonproducuve chaos and collapses into the
conundrum which we define as culture. What Dewey proposes is the creative
advancement towards a natural promotion of social control within a society:
We understand it in the degree to which we make it a patt of our own
attitudes ... To some degree we become artists ourselves as we undertake
this integration, and, by bringing it to pass, our own experience is
reoriented (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 334).
The congruence lies in the reciprocal nature of the individual's experience of
environment:
There is no point in the philosophy of progressive education which is
sounder than its emphasis upon the importance of the participation of the
learner in the formation of the purposes which direct his activities in the
leaming process, just as tfiere is no defat in traditional education greater
than its failure to secure the active cooperation of the pupil in the
construction of the putposes involved in his studying (Gray, 1952, p. 113).
By championing a place for the aesthetic through experience, Dewey is suggesting that
the presence or absence of the experience of the aesthetic cesides in the imaginative
interaction between the two: rational as opposed to irrational behaviour (Dewey, 1985, p.
193). As Win Edman argues: "In a rationai society, the free and aitical discrimination
which marks aesthetic appreciation would be applied to al1 human concerns" (Edman,
1929, p. 132). The aesthetic becomes the mediating variable relative to what the
individual can know. Tt serves as a vehicle for personal as weii as social discovery: "the
material of esthetic (sic) experience in king human-human in connection with the nature
of which it is a part-is social" (Dewey, 1980 [2934], p. 325). As Dewey contends in his
text:
Life is no uniform unintempted rnarch or flow. It is a thing of histories,
each with its own plot, its own inception and movement toward its close,
each having its own particular rhythmic movement; each with its own
unrepeated quality pervading it throughout (Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 35-
35).
In this way, Dewey challenges the attitude that would give an a priori credibility to a
master nanative:
We are now habituated to one mode of satisfaction and we take our own
attitude of desire and purpose to be so inherent in aü human nature as to
give the measure of al1 works of art, as constituting the demand which al1
works of art meet and should satisfy (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 332).
As Dewey States at the outset, the aesthetic deals with al1 experiential aspects of culture,
inctuding the economy of life and its nuances (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 44). Shusterman
interprets this as follows:
In freeing philosophy fiom its search for foundations, Dewey hoped to
enIist it for practicai refom, directing its criticai acumen and imaginative
energy to the resolution of concrete social and cultural problems
(Shusterman, 1997, p. 157).
It is here that Dewey argues for the ments of critical thinking and informed judgements
through the aesthetic experience:
Barriers are dissolved, and lirniting prejudices melt away . . . .This
insensible melting is far more efficacious than the change effected by
reasoning because it enters directly into attitude (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p.
334).
6.2 Aesthetics for Our Times
In order to understand the impact that Dewey's aesthetics has on culture, it is
crucial to understand that Our social attitudes are defined by what drives them:
"increasingly demanded and reinforced . . . Dy1 a production oriented, business-centered,
financially driven style of social organization" (Hermann, 1988, p. 21). Consequentiy
we must accept that there exists a battIe between two philosophies: "One of them accepts
life and expenence in al1 its uncertainty" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 34) and the other is
synonymous with and grounded in the pursuit of a reductive and uncontested materialism
that everywhere counters the ubiquitous possibilities of the aesthetic experience.
Dewey Iikens the aesthetic experience to a mystery ride that will "deepen and
intensify its own qualities" (Dewey, 1980 [1934J, p. 355). His theory equates the
aesthetic with the natural evolution of organic wisdom that lies obliquely to ail that
surrounds us. Dewey believes that the aesthetic expenence may enhance the strength of
Our thinking abilities (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. tg) and ennch the quaiities of our
surroundings when life is seen as art and when the aesthetic is conjoined in a life that is
synonymous with the intelligence of the aesthetic. As Edman (1929) claims on behalf of
Dewey:
Experience is the name for Iife in so far as it is meaningful. Art is the
name for that intelligence by which meanings are suggested, realized, and
embodied. Art and intelligence become identical; they are synonyms for
that process by which life becornes articulate and deliberately d i t e d "
(Edman, 1929, p. 122).
Dewey's aesthetic is not an emphasis on the making of the art product so much as
it is a consideration of the social and personal benefits derived fiom engaging in the
aesthetic experience. It is a radical proposai for refining the Ieaming experience in
education through the arts:
Art throws off the covers that hide the expressiveness of experienced
things; it quickens us from the blackness of routine and enables us to
Forget ourselves by finding ourselves in the delight of experiencing the
world about us in its varied qualities and forms. Tt intercepts every shade
of expressiveness found in objects and orders them to a new experience of
Iife (Ikwey, 1980 [1934], p. 1 10).
It is the art of experience that is intnnsicaily bound to nature and not isolated and
removed from the naniral forces within which people live (Zeltner, 1975, p, 2). The
aesthetic experience becomes an inserumental benefit, one tfiat stimulates the senses and
quickens human growth.
in this chapter 1 have argued that, in my view, the greatest insight that Dewey
provided concerning the aesthetic was that it could serve as developmentai and
integrating force for the individual, well beyoad its materiai value as an art object. In so
arguing. Dewey challenges our passive and complacent assumptions about ourselves
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 24). In addition, he admonished society for its foolish blindness
to the possibilities of the aesthetic, in reducing the aesthetic to a marginal position in the
cumculum (Dewey [1934], p. 2; Lankford, 1995, p. 93).
Chapter Seven
Condusion
This research has investigated Art as Exmrience as a multi-faceted text with many
layers of meaning. 1 have show how it offers the reader a myriad of possibilities for
extrapolation. 1 have investigated what Shusterman (1992) refers to as a somatic
naturaiism, an explmation that suggests that there is a contextual element to the unity of
human experience. The aesthetic then becomes a heuristic device, a methodology, a kind
of connective aesthetics that aIlows for individual expansion within the experientiai
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 43). By this Dewey seeks the generating beliefs that underlie
Our culture. This gives his theory contemporary value as we search for cultural
guideposts by which to define ourseIves and by which to relate to our cornmunities
(Dewey, 1980 [1934], pp. 82-83; 2 12).
Dewey weaves a tapestry of knowing (Zeltner, 1975, p. SO), which is how Zeltner
describes Art as Exuerience. Accordiig to Dewey, it is a fact of existence that, out of the
construction of time and through the interactions that occur, people do have contact with
their environments. His main contribution, 1 have shown, is that Iife experiences can
become permeated by the aesthetic experience.
A combination of al1 practical and incidentai events that confront us in our
ordinary lives become promises for enrichrnent and empowerment of our lives, if we
allow them to. Out of this serendipity of change, a sequence of life events is ordered to a
variation of changes (Dewey, 1980 [L934], p. 150) which becomes the "continual
interplay" (Jackson, 1998, p. 170) of our perception to the adaptive process called
aesthetic experience (Dewey, 1980, [1934] p. 282). It is the aesthetic that forms the
connective links chat bind and unify experience.
The aesthetic experience becomes a purposeful interaction (Dewey, 1980 [I934],
p. 276). What is learned is measured and considered as form, function and purpose,
when adaptation as a factor of king is coupled to Dewey's aesthetic theory and becomes
the means to the refining element within human experience (Alexander, 1987, p. 197).
And indeed the experience assumes some purposeful component when what is learned
becomes incorporated into one's ongoing repertoires of responsive adaptations. The
aesthetic becomes the mode through which individual living is made possible and
realizable1-as the self fin& expression by and through the aesthetic object (Dewey, 1980
[1934], pp. 65; 77; 255). Life then becomes a series of transactions when what is known
becomes reflected as a facet of that experience which is dtimately determined by the
rnind that knows it. Thought aad imagination becomes something that transforms
experience and the aesthetic is that vehicle which enhances this transformation. .
'IIewey's theory suggests a meliorism, that espouses popular art as a viable critical approach to discriminating the artistic.(Cwper, 1995 119921, pp. 336-339.)
Or as Kestenbaum argues:
His conception of organic interaction, and his later conception of
transaction, were attempts to capture the reciprocal implication of self and
world in every expenenced situation (Kestenbaum, 1977, p. 1).
Thus transaction, reciprocity, and transformation become fundamentai to the aesthetic
experience-as the aesthetic illuminates the path of life, and experience promotes this
growth and development. As Thomas Alexander says of Dewey:
Art is not some by-product of experience, a refreshing wayside in the
arduous highway of our instrumentaiist affairs. It is the reveIation of what
experience is al1 about (Alexander, 1987, p. 60).
The manner in which we give symbolic expression to Our means of communication
justifies its capacity to enrich us. In addition, Dewey's philosophy of the aesthetic dso
points to the afEinning tendencies of the aesthetic experience, in its capacity t~ promote a
social reconciIiation within a culture (Greene, 1995, p. 125). His text serves as a
discussion of culture, the shared life of humans king given uItimate expression in the
aesthetic as a twl for communication beyond Our social and cultural barriers:
in the end, works of art are the only media of complete and unhindered
communication between man and man that cm occur in a world full of
gdfs and waüs that Iimit comrnunity of experience (Dewey, 1980 [1934],
p. 105).
In this way, the aesthetic expenence suppties a unifying energy that enhances the quality
of our interactions and the substance of our Lives.
7.1 Implications for Education
Clearly, what has been discussed in this thesis has relevance to Iearning and
therefore to education in the broadest sense. It is worth pointing out, however, that it is as
a liberal democrat and as a philosopher that Dewey underscores the relevance of the
individual's encounter of the aesthetic as both meaninghl and productive:
Implicit in this view is a valuing of peopIe as the experts in their own
lives, who have an important stake in how issues are resolved . . .
knowledge is not something that stands done or is produced in a vacuum
by a sort of 'pure' intellectual process. Instead a11 knowledge is value
laden and shaped by historie, socid, political, gender and econornic
conditions (Berman et al., 1998, p. 3).
According to Dewey, completeness and finality are never an element of learning, and thus
the learning experience is always on-going and changing (Greene, 1973, p. 108). This
theme of beliefs and values adds an axiological dimension to Dewey's aesthetic
philosophy, a dimension that extends out into the schools. There the teacher becomes the '
facilitator whose task is to remove barriers to the aesthetic experience (Lather, 199 1, p.
ix). The teacher enables and empowers the student by holding up the possibility of
encountering multiple realities (Greene, 1995, pp. 56.64). This process gives the person
a practical advantage. The old takes on a new colour and meaning in king employed to
grasp and to interpret the new (Dewey, 1958 [1929], p. ix). Just as the form collapses
into a new form as the creative work emerges, if allowed to, so too experience collapses
into new experiences (Mandelbrot, 1999; Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 155). in this way these
facets emerge:
Each kat, in differentiating a part within the whole, adds to the face of
what went before while creating a suspense that is a demand for something
CO come. It is not a variation in single feature but a modulation of the
entire pewasive and univng qualitative substratum (Dewey, 1980 [1934],
p. 155).
As 1 have tried to emphasize throughout this analysis, Dewey identifies this
dynamic as the process of king dive to one's surmundings and to oneseIf, a process in
which our past experiences and expectations establish how or if we will use these
experiences. As Holder argues:
James and Dewey viewed thinking as a process emergent from and
continuousIy controlled by non-cognitive levels of experience, levels that
include experientiai structures such as emotion, habit, and imagination
(Holder, 1995, p. 1 1).
Dewey's claim for the sipificance of the aesthetic to learning underscores his
prernise that, without the aesthetic, understanding and knowledge become disabled and
impoverished. It is his focus on the direction of beliefs and values that allows Dewey to
delineate his aesthetic philosophy from an axiologicai perspective.
7.2 Suggested Areas for Further Research
What are the implications for educational research in Dewey's aesthetic
philosophy? Richard Shusterman argues that the need for the implementation of Dewy's
aesthetic is greater than ever (Shusteman, 1992, p. 45). He argues for the inclusion of
the aesthetic experience in the curriculum because of the dire state of education
(Shusterman, 1992). Given this, 1 wiil concIude with a series of qualitative research
questions that might be used to advance the delivery of worthwhüe education programs in
our schools.
Firstly we might explore whether there is any axiological worth in the inclusion of
aesthetic Iearning in the cu~culum. Can the reflexive nature of the aesthetic experience
influence our decision making either positively or negatively?
Secondly, can the aesthetic experience be used to test our values and assumptions.
If, as Dewey argues, the aesthetic experience serves as a complement to empiricd
experience, then we should be able to test this through stories and iIlustrations within the
classroom, We would rhen be in a better position to establish whether the aesthetic
experience can influence our abilities to manage our affairs in a more effective manner.
FinaIIy, we might be better able to examine the validity of Dewey's aesthetic
assumptions if we could demonstrate that students are cognitively ernpowered by having
aesthetic experiences. This merits further investigation.
In the time that it twk me to achieve my goal of finding a meaning in Dewey's
text, 1 dissdved one relationship, gained another, and set out on a new course in life.
Thus the knowiedge derived from my experiences has becorne reconstructive in my life,
in that as a Iearner 1 have becorne my own work of art-in-progress (Boydston, f 973, p. 80;
Schilpp, 1939, p, 45; Dewey, 2980 [1934], p. 246).
In this sarne way, the reciprocal event cafied my life, my experience, caused a
transformation to occur in me when things previously extema1 to rny world became
contextually relevant and significant. Art as Experience assurned a much greater
dimension than that which 1 had UiitiaiIy intended. My Me became the litmus test of
Dewey's theory of the aesthetic experience.
Simultaneously, the transformations and exchanges in my life made for an even
greater personal evolution as I went about leaming what Dewey's philosophy was al1
about. As Dewey put it: "Experience is rendered conscious by means of this fusion of old
rneanings and new situations that transfigures both [intol'a transformation that defines
imagination" (Dewey, 1980 [1934], p. 275).
As my creative imagination went to work to organize my thoughts2 into this
semblance of coherent new connections, intuition turned into insight and 1 gained some
understanding of what it was that Dewey meant. In the end my efforts also assurned the
possibilities for new expressions as the aesthetic "operates through the medium of
individual temperament and the peculiar, unique, incidents of an individuai life" (Schilpp,
1939, p.44).
' ~ o ~ e r Penrose (1939. p. 437) refen to this p m m s as the following: "by synapses becorning activated or deactivated through the growth or contraction of dendritic spines" a cognitive evolution cded perspicacious or creative thinking cornes into existence-what I prefer to cal1 the acquisition of insight, and which couid daim to be the corollary to the aesthetic experience.
Dewey's paradigrn affiims the individual's continuous evolution, and thus it
serves as a vehicle by which to affirm a multipIicity of possibilities for us. It also
continues to drive researchers in their continuous search for more acute expianations of
Dewey's meaninp, understandings through which the individual could share in the
aesthetic experience if given increased opportunities for doing do so.
Bibliography
Books:
Abbs, P. Ed. (1989). The Svmbolic Order: A Contemuoram Reader on the Arts Debate.
New York: The Falmer Press.
Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1987). Electronic Learning: issues and Teaching I&as for
Educational Comouting, Television and Visual Literacy. Springfield: Charfes C.
Thomas Publisher.
Aiexander, T. (1987). John Dewev's Theorv of art. Exmience, and Nature: The
Horizons of Feeling. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Alexander, T. ( 1992 11 979)). The Pepper-Croce Thesis and Dewey's 'ïdealist'
Aesthetics. In J.E. TiIes (Ed.), John Dewev Critical Assessments (pp. 346-355).
New York: Routledge.
Anderson. R. L. (1990). Callioae's Sisters: A Cornuamive Studv of Philosoohies of Art.
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Appignanesi, R. & Garratt, C. (1995). Postmodernism For Beginners. Cambridge: Icon
Books.
Archambault, R D. (1964). John Dewev on Education: Selected Writings, New York:
The Modem Library.
Amheim, R. (1995). The Sources of Cognition. In T.A. Sebeok & J.U. Sebeok (Eds.),
Advances in Visual Semiotics: The Serniotic Web. 1992-1994 (pp. 48-60). New
York: Mouton de Gmyter.
Aronowitz, S. (1992). The Politics of Identitv: Class, Culture. Social Movements. New
York: Routledge.
Audi, J. (Ed.), (1995). The Cambridge Dictionarv of Philosovhy. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Beardsley, M. C., & Schueller, H. M. (Eds.). (1967). Aesthetic Inauirv. Belmont:
Dickenson Publishing Company.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann,T. (1967 [1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New
York: Doubleday & Company.
Berleant, A. (1970). The Aesthetic Fieid. A Phenomenolom of Aesthetic Exmience.
Springfield, nlinois: Charles C. Thomas Publishing.
Bernstein, R, J. (197 1). Praxis and Action: Contem~orarv Philoso~hies of Human
Activitv. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bettleheim, B. (1979). Surviving and Other Essavs. New York: Knopf Publishing.
Boisvert, R. (1988). Dewev's Metaohvsiscs. New York: Foniham University Press.
Boisvert, R. (1998). John k w e v Rethinkine; Our Time. AIbany: State University of
New York Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). The RuIes of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literarv Field.
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). SchooIing in Ca~italist Arnerica: Educationai Reform
and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books, Inc.,
hblishers.
Brickman, W. W., & Lehrer, S. (Eds.). (1966 [1959]). John Dewev: Master Educator.
New York: Atherton Press.
Brosio, R. A. (1994). A Radical Democratic Critiaue of Capitalist Education. New
York Peter Lang.
Buzan, T. (1974). Use Your Head. London: BBC Publishing.
Cahoone, L, E. (1996). From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishers.
Carneron, D. et al. (1970). L' Education Artistiaue de la Grand Publiaue. Toronto:
Conference Canadienne des Arts.
Cassirer, E. (1953). An Essav on Man. New York: Doubleday.
Cohen, I. (Ed.). (1996). For Love of Countrv: Debating the Limits of Patriotisrn.
Boston: Beacon Press.
Coleman, F, (1968). What is the Aesthetic Point of View? In F. J. CoIeman (Ed.),
Contem~orarv Studies in Aesthetics (pp. 2-23). New York: McGraw Hill,
Collins, R. et ai. (Eds.). (1986). Media. Culture and Society: A Critical Rea&r.
London: Sage.
Cooper, D. E. (Ed.). (1995 [1992]). A Com~anion to Aesthetics. Oxfonk BIackwell
Publishers Ltd..
Cooper, D. E. (1997). Aesthetics: The Classic Readings. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Ltd.
Copleston, F. SJ. (1966). A Historv of Phiioso~hv: Volume VIE New York: The
Newman Press.
Cmnden, R, M. (1990). A Brief Historv of American Culture, Helsinki: SHS.
Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive Disintemation. Boston: Littie, Brown and Company.
De Bono, E. (1976). Teaching Thinking. London: Temple Smith.
Dewey, J. (1991 [1910]). How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books.
Dewey, J. (19 IO). The Influence of Darwin on Philosoahv and Other Essavs in
Contemmrarv Thought. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1944 (19161). Dernocracv and Education: An Introduction to L!e Philoso~hv
of Education, New York: The Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1917). Creative Intelligence: Essavs in the Ptamnatic Attitude. New York:
Henry HoIt and Company.
Dewey, J. (1958 [1929]). ExDerience and Nature. New York: Dover Publications.
Dewey, J. ( 1970 [ 193 11). The Wav Out of Educational Confusion. Westpon:
Greenwood Press, Publisfiers.
Dewey, 1. (1934). Art as Exuerience. New York: Minton, Baich and Company.
Dewey, J. (1980 L1934)). Art as Expenence. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, J. (1938). ExDerience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Dewey, J. (1 939). Inteiligence in the Modem World. New York The Modem Library.
Dewey, J. et al. (1954 [1929). Art and Education: A CokIection of Essavs (3d ed.).
Merion, Pennsylvania: The B m e s Foundation Press.
Dykhuizen, G. (1973). The Life and Mind of John Dewev. Carbondaie: Southem
Illinois University Press.
Dissanayake, E. (1995 [1992]). Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Cornes from and Wh.
Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Eccles, J. C. (1994). How the Self Controls Its Brain. New York: Springer Vedag.
Edman, I. (1929). A Philosophy of Experience as a Philosophy of Art. In Essavs in
Honour of John Dewev on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthdav, October 20,
1929 (pp. ?). New York: Henry Holt and Company. -
Edman, 1. (1976 [1950]). Dewey and Art. in S. Hook (Ed.), John Dewev: Philosoutier of
Science and Freedom: A Svm~osium (pp. 47-65). Westport: Greenwood Press,
Publishers.
Edwards, B. (1979)- Drawing on the right side of the Brain. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher
Efland, A. D. et ai. (1996). Postmodem Art Education: An Ap~toach to Curricuhm.
Reston, Virginia: NAEA.
Ellul, J. (1973 [1965]). Pro~aeanda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes. New York:
Vintage Random House.
Featherstone, M. (1997 [1995]). Undoinn Culture: GIobalization, Postmodemism, and
Identity. London: Sage Publication.
Firth, R. (1963 [195 11). Elements of Social Ormnization. Boston: Beacon Press.
Flax, 1. (1990). Thinking Framents: Psychoanalvsis. Feminism. and Postmodemism in
the Contemuorarv West. Los Angeles: University of CaIifornia Press.
Fowler, C. (1988). Can We Rescue the Arts for America's Children? Cominp to Our
Senses 10 Years Late. New York: American Council for the Arts.
F d e l , C. (1963 [1957]). The Love of Anxietv and Other Essavs. New York: Hatper
& Row.
Freire, P. (1970 (19631). Pedagom of the ûunressed. New York: Continuum
PubIishers.
Frye, R. (1937). Vision and k s i m London: Pelican Books.
Ganison, J. (Ed.). (1995). The New Scholarship on Dewey. iondon: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Gates, H. L. (1992). Loose Canons: Notes on the Culture Wars. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Giddens. A. (1993). Socioloey- (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giroux, H. A. et aI. (Eds.). (198 1). Curriculum and Instruction: Alternatives in
Education. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Glad, P. W. (1975). Promssive Centurv. The American Nation and its Second Hundred
Years. Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company.
Gleeson, D. (Ed.). (1977). Identitv and Structure: Issues in the Sociologv of
Education. Driffield, England: Nafferton Books.
Globus, G. (1995). The Postmodern Brain. Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing
Company.
Goldberg, M. (1997). Arts and Leaminn: An Intemated Amroach to Teachinr! and
Learning in MuIticultural Sett ins New York: Longman.
Gornbrich, E. K. (1991). Topics of Our T i e : Twentieth Centw Issues in Leaminn -
and in Art. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Goodman, N. (1976). Lanmiages of Art: An Au~roach to the Theorv of SvmboIs.
hdiana: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Goodman, R. B. (1995). Pramatism: A Contemuoran Reader. New York: Routledge.
Gordon, W. I. J. (1961). Svnectics: The DeveIopment of Creative Ca~acity. New York:
Harper & Row Publishing Company.
Gotshaik, D. W. (1964). "On Dewey's Aesthetics" in J. E. Tiles. (Ed.), John Dewev
Criticai Assessments (pp. 323-333). New York Routledge.
Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as Strange~ Educationai Philoso~hv for the Modem Aae.
Beirnont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essavs on Education. The Arts. and
Social Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hamblen, K. (1987). Qualifications and Contradictions of Art Museum Education in a
Pluralistic Democracy. in D. Blandy & K. G. Congdon (Eds.), Art in a
Dernocracy. (pp. 13-25). New York: Macmillan.
Hampden-Tumer, C. (1982). M a ~ s of the Mind. New York: Collier Macmillan.
Hannan, B. (1985). Dernomtic CurricuIum: Essavs on SchooIinrz and Societv. London:
George Allen and Unwin.
Haussman, J. J. (Ed.). (1980). Arts and the SchooIs. New York: McGraw-H.1 Book
Company.
Hemann, N. (1988)- The Creative Brain. Lake Lure, North Carolina: Ned Hemnann,
Brain Books.
Hickrnan, L. A. (Ed,). (1998). Readine Dewev: Interpretations for a Postmodem
Generation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Holder, J. J. (1995). An Epistemological Foundation for Thinking: A Deweyan
Approach. in J, Garrison (Ed.), The New Scholarshb on Dewev (pp. 7-24).
London: KIuwer Academic Publishers.
Hook, S. ( 1939). John Dewev: An Intellectual Portrait. New York: John Day Company.
Hook, S. (1976 [1950]). John Dewev: PhiIoso~her of Science and Freedom: A
Svm~osium. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Hutwitz, A. et al. (Eds.). (1984). Art Education. An International Perspective. London:
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hurwiu, A., & Day, M. (1991 [1958]). Children and Their Art: Methods for the
EIementarv School(5' ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
College PubIishers.
Hutcheon, L. (1989). The Politics of Postmodemisrn. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, P. W. (1998). John Dewev and the Lessons of Art. New Haven: Yale
University Press.
Kaelin, E. F. (1989). An Aesthetic For Art Educators. New York: Teachers College,
Press.
Keamey, R. (1988). The Wake of Imagination: Ideas of Creativitv in Western Culture.
London: Hutchinson Education.
Keeney, B. P. (1 983). Aesthetics of Change. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kestenbaum, V. (1977). The Phenomenological - Sense of John Dewev: Habit and
Meaning. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Kincheloe, I. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1995). Thirteen Ouestions: Reframinn Education's
Conversation. New York: Peter Lang.
Klauser, H, A. (1987). Writing on Both Sides of the Brain. San Francisco: Harper &
Row Publishing.
Kohan, S. (1988). The Childhood of Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
KozoI, J. (1991). Savage ineaudities: Children in America's Schools. New York:
Crown Pubtishers.
Langer, S. K. (1957). Problems of Art. New York: Chades Scnbner's Sons.
Latiier, P. ( 199 1). Gettinp; Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogv WiWin the
Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Lawson, D. (1970). The Teachinrc of Values: From Ethical Tdealism to Social
Psvchology. Montreai: McGiH University.
Levi, A. W., & Smith, R A, (1991). Art Education: A Critical Necessity. Urbana:
University of nlinois Press.
Lunn, F. (1992). The Posmodem Doctrine. Montreai: Concordia University.
Lyas, C. ( 1997). Aesthetics. Montreal: McGdl-Queen's University Press.
Madeja, S. S. (1989). Fotward. In E. F. Kaeiin, (pp. ix-xi). An Aesthetic for Art
Educatoa. New York: Teachers College Press.
Maitz, M. (19'70). Psycho-cvbemetics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Manfredi, J, (1982). The Social Limits of Art. Amherst: The University of
Massachusetts Press.
Melvin, G. (1992). The Social Philosophy Underlying Dewey's Theory of Art. In J. E.
Tiles (Ed.), John Dewev: Critical Assessments (pp. 302-3 1 1). New York:
Routledge.
Meyer, L. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicag0:University of Chicago Press.
Mills, C.W. (1967 [1964]). Sociolom and Pramnatism. The Higher Leaming in
Amenca. New York: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emueror's New Mind: Concemine Comuuters. Mincis. and the
Law of Phvsics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Postman. Neil. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of
Show Business. New York: Viking Penguin, inc.
Progoff, I. (1973 [1963]). The Svmbolic and the Red. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Ramer, S ., & Altman, J. (Eds.). (1 964). John Dewev and Arthur F. Bentiey: A
Philosouhical Corresuondence, 1932-195 1. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers
University Press.
Read, H. (1943). Education Throuph Art. London: Faber and Faber.
Read, H. (1949). Education for Peace. New York: Charles Saibner's Sons.
Rich, A. (1994). What is Found There: Notebooks on Poeirv and Poiitics. New York:
W. W. Norton & Company, inc.
Riis, J. A. (1902 [1901]). The Making of an American. New York Macmillan.
Romanell, P. (1958). Towards a Cntical Naturaiism: Refiections on Contemoroarv
American Philosoohy. New York: Macmillan & Company.
Romanell, P. (1992). A Comment on Croce's and Dewey's Aesthetics. In J. E. Tiles
(Ed.), John Dewev Criticai Assessments, (pp. 464-467). New York: Routledge.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theorv of
the Literaw Work. Carbondaie: Southern Iilinois University Press.
Ross, M. (Ed.). (1980). The Arts and Personal Growth. New York: Pergarnon Press.
Roth, R. J. (1962). John Dewev and SeIf-Realization. New Jersey: Prentice Hail.
Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the Hi& Tide of American Liberdism. New York: W.
W. Norton & Company.
Ryder, J. (Ed.). (1994). American Philosoohic Naturalism in the Twentieth Century.
Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Sagan, C. (1977). The Dragons of Eden: Swculations on the Evolution of Human
Intelliaence. New York: Random House.
Schilpp, P.A. (Ed.). (1939). The Philosouhv of John Dewev. Chicago: Northwestern
University.
Shoemaker, F. (1945). Aesthetic Experience and the Humanities: Modem Ideas of Aesthetic
Exwrience in the Reading of World Literature. New York: CoIumbia University
Press.
Shusterman, R. (1992). Pramatic Aesthetics: Living Beaum. Rethinking Art. Oxford:
BlackweiI,
Shusterman, R. (1997). Pracucina Philosoohv: h m a t i s m and the Philosoohv of Life.
New York: Routledge.
Sleeper, R. W. (1986). The Necessitv of Pramnatism. New Haven: Yde University Press.
Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts. Facts, and Fernininim. New York: Routledge.
Smith, P. (1996). The Histow of Amencan Art Education: M n g About Art in Amencan
Schools. London: Greenwood Press.
Smith. R. (1994). General Knowledge and Arts Education: An Intemretation of E.D.
Hirsch's Cultural Literacv. Chicago: University of IIIinois Press.
Stewart. J., & Kent, C. (1992). Learning Bv Heart. New York: Bantam Doubleday.
Stiles, K., & Selz, P. (1996). Theories and Documents of Contemuorarv Art. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Stimpson, C. R. (1988). Where the Meanings Are. New York: Methuen.
Stitskin, L. D. (1976). Jewish Philoso~hv: A Studv in Personalism. New York: Yeshiva
University Press.
Takaki, R. (1993). A Different Mirroc A Historv of Multiculturai Arnerica Toronto: Little,
Brown and Company.
Taylor, B. (1995). Avant-garde and After, Rethinkina Art Now. New York: Harry N.
Abrams, Inc.
TayIor, C. (1989). Sources of the SeIf. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tejera, V. (1996). American Modem. The Path Not Taken. New York: Rowrnan &
LittIefieId Publishers, Inc.
Thompson, PB. (1985). Technological Mediation and Nuclear Weapons. In L. Hickman
(Ed.), Philoso~hv, TecknoIogv and Human Affairs (pp. 374-378). Texas: IBIS Press
of Coiiege Station.
Tiles, J. E. (Ed.). John Dewev Critical Assessments. New York: Routledge.
Torgovnik, M. (1990). Gone Primitive: Sava~e intellects: Modem Lives. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Vivas, E. (1992). A Note on the Emocion in Mr. Dewey's Theory of Art. In J. E. Tiles
(Ed.), John Dewey Critical Assessments (pp. 374-378). New York: Routledge.
Weintraub, L. et al. (1996). Art on the Edae and Over: Searching: for Art's Meanina in
Contemoorarv Societv 1970's-L990's. Litchfield, Connecticut: Art hsights, Inc.
West, C. (1989). The American Evasion of Philoso~hv. A Genealogv of Pramatism.
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
William, L. V. (1983). A Guide to Rie;ht Brain/Left Brain Education: Teaching for the Two-
Sided mind. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Wolff, J. (1993 [1983]). Aesthetics and the Sociolow of Art. (20d ed.). Ann Arbor: The
University of Michigan Press.
Wood, E. J. (1990). Philosophical Percepions of Art and Education with Em~hasis on the
Analvtic Philosouhv of Nelson Goodman. Montreal: McGill University.
Zeltner, P. M. (1975). John Dewev's Aestheric Philoso~hv. Amsterdam: B. R. Gniner, B.V.
Ziff, P- (1968). The Task of Defining a Work of Art. In F. I. CoIeman (Ed), Contemwraw
Studies in Aesthetics (pp. 94-1 1 i). New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Journals:
Ames, V. M. (1953). John Dewey as Aesthetician. The Journai of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 2 (2), 145-168.
Beardsley, M. C. (1967). Aesthetic Experience Regained. The Joumai of Aesthetics and
Art Cnticism, 2 (1). 3-1 1.
Berman, H. et ai. (1998). Cornbining Stories and Numbers: A MethodoiogicaI Approach
for a Cntical Nursing Science. Advances in Nursing Science, 2(1), l- f 5.
Boas, G. (1953). Communication in Dewey's Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Cnticisrn, 2 (2). 177-183.
Croce, B. (1948). On the Aesthetics of Dewey. The Journal of Aesthetics & Art
Criticism, a, (3). 203-207.
Dennis, L. J. (1972). Dewey's Debt to Aibert Coombs Barnes. Educationai Theory, 2 (3),
325-33 1.
Garber, E., & Gaudelius, Y. (1992). Object into Subject: Feminism, Art, Education, and the
Construction of the Self. Canadian Review of Art Education, 19 (11, 12-33,
Gray, J. G. (1952, August). 1s Progressive Education a Failure? Some of the Current
Cnticisrns Exarnined. Commentarv, 107-1 1 1.
Lanier, V. (1974). A Plague on Ail Your Houses: The Tragedy of Art Education. &
Education, 2 (3), 12-15.
Lankford, E.L. (1995). Tirne, Money, and the New Art Education, Studies in Art
Education, 36 (2), 84-95.
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1999, February). A Multifractal Waik Down Wall Street.
Scientific American, 70-73.
Mezirow, S. (1989). Transformation Theory and Social Action: A Response to Collard and
Law. Adult Education Ouarierlv. 2 (3), 169- 175.
Munro, J. (1954). The MorphoIogy of Art as a Branch of Aesthetics. The Journal of
Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2 (4), 438-449.
Pepper, S. C. (1953). The Concept of Fusion in Dewey's Aesthetic Theory. The Journal of
Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Q (21, 169-176,
Seigfried, D. H. (1991). Where are al1 the Pragrnatist Feminists? Hwatia, 6 (2). 1-20.
Tejera, V. ( 1 990). The Centrdity of Art in Classical American Philosophy. Amencan
Studies 33 1 (I), 83-90. -9 -