Download - Tracking session univ of notts2
Tracking the use of OERs
Open Nottingham Seminar, University of Nottingham
7th July 2011
Executive summary:
Why bother tracking: its impossible isn’t it? Yes, short of adding viruses to OERs – but
there are some things we can try now.© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Benefits of tracking OER usage
• funders to measure the value and direction of their activities
• Creators can have something more tangible than “number of downloads”
• potential re-users of an OER can discover similar works, or to see the 'family tree' of the resource.
• Seeing the ‘provenance’ or history of an OER can add value and credibility to it and may generate serendipitous discoveries
…OER projects
We are working with :
• Business, Management, Accountancy & Finance (BMAF) Subject Centre - Open for business accredited courses
• Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism (HLST) Subject Centre & BMAF - 2012: Learning Legacies
• University College Falmouth. Accredited Course 30 credit, postgraduate module that introduces and builds awareness of IPR and copyright within course design and development.
• JISC/HEA Phase 1 OER project released 360 credits of Engineering related OERs (inc. lots of images)
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Early tracking attempts: TinEye web service
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
The plan…
• Create a simple tracking method that could be easily attached to the majority of OERs
• Release some test OERs with tracking codes and monitor online progress (if any)
Tracking Method
• System had to be as quick and simple to use as OERs themselves
• Not draconian but users/re-users had to be motivated to support it
• Not technically complex – text format – easy to add to most things
• no central regulatory agency (e.g; DOI) or bureaucracy – slow and expensive (and so not recession proof?)
• potential re-users of an OER can discover similar works, or to see the 'family tree' of the resource, just by clicking a link.
• Completely new codes must be easy to create by anybody• Don’t expect perfection – OERs are about relaxing control, not
tightening it and this is an unregulated system
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Tracking Method
Each Resource should be allocated a code in the following format:
man:240265:rh4xs
man: An (optional) three letter name, no vocabulary, could be “oer”, “Joe”, “man” (Manchester), oxf (Oxford) etc. If not used remove the colon that comes after it (a-z, 0-9, A-Z)
240265: the date of the creation or release of the OER in the form DD/MM/YY
rh4xs: a unique 5-letter code, allocated by the project. (a-z, 0-9)
This code would be added to the copyright citation, e.g;
© Poppleton University (ppl:240265:rh4xs) or
© ppl:240265:rh4xs or © 240265:rh4xs
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Derivative works
© guy:120311:a0021
© rcp:051010:a0021
How to generate a new unique code for new OERs.
• If an author doesn't wish to link a new work with any existing materials contained a new code can be created. Choose your own 3-letter code, add the anticipated release date and search as below on Google with a plus sign prepended:
+tom:030504
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
© luf:240200:l0002
• if nothing comes back citing this code then create a new 5-letter code of your choice, e.g; “a0000″ and append it to your resource. If the search returns a positive result, either make up a new 5-letter code and check for that appended to the previous search, or start again.
22 Example Engineering releases
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Profile board© luf:131010:L0014
Using a dummy frame© luf:131010:L0012
Yagi antenna system. © rcp:140510:a0001
OER logo© luf:240111:L0047
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
© rcp:051010:a0021
© rcp:251010:a0029
© rcp:051010:a0024
© rcp:051010:a0013
29 general images
83 results
Fig. 1. An example image released via the project including a copyright tracking code. © rcp:140510:a0001
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
© rcp:051010:a0021
12 results
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Squirrel reuse
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
Advantages• (Though not guaranteed), propagation of the code becomes a simple part of
the legal obligation of the user or re-user of the material under all the Creative Commons (CC) licenses, thus linking all works incorporating parts or all of the original work together.
• Due to the penetration and ubiquity of Google’s search tool the need for a custom resolver service is dispensed with. (Particularly as Open Resources should be discoverable by normal means to be properly “open”)
• By adding a Google search URL into the original OER where possible, perhaps on the legal disclaimer page or the introductory text in the case of documents e.g
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=240265:rh4xs
• a click on that link will bring up all visible online linked and derivative works as well as metadata if the resource is cited in a open repository, for instance, Jorum.
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
The future..• Tracking of OER usage and derivative works and the
ability to easily generate a family tree of related resources by just using a tamed Google search
• An indirect way of linking people with similar interests and areas of expertise
• Usage and reusage data• How a code propagates
(or doesn’t), can provide insights into community needs and understanding ofproper copyright citationpractices
© luf:240200:l0001
© Rob Pearce, Loughborough University.
More details
• http://icesculpture.wordpress.com/make-evolved-oer-discoverable/
© luf:060809:l0006